annual report fix - international land coalition · strong small-scale farming ... cooperatively on...
TRANSCRIPT
OUR GOAL : PEOPLE CENTERED LAND GOVERNANCEILC’s membership has defired 10 commitments to jointly realise this goal :
1. Secure Tenure Rights
2. Strong Small-scale Farming System
3. Diverse Tenure Systems
4. Equal Land Rights For Women
5. Secure Territorial Rights For Indigenous People
6. Locally-managed Ecosystems
7. Inclusive Decision Making
8. Transparent And Accessible Information
9. Effective Actions Againts Land Grabbing
10. Protected Land Rights Defenders
CON
TEN
T
01. Background and overview by the Regional Coordinator
02. Connect-Mobilize-Influence (CMI) in NES countries
2.1 Nes Countries
2.1.1 India
2.1.2 Bangladesh
2.1.3 Nes Cambodia
2.1.4 Nes Indonesia
2.1.5 Nes Phillippines
2.1.6 Nes Nepal
2.1.7 New Nes In Asia
0.3 Connect-Mobilize-Influence across countries in the region
3.1. Diverse tenure systems : Rangelands Initiative Asia
3.2. Advancing Indigenous Peoples’ land rights recognition
3.3. Ensuring gender justice in the land rights movement
3.4. 2016 Asia Land Forum and Asia Regional Assembly
3.5 Mainstreaming Land Rights as Human Rights in the ASEAN and SAARC
3.6 Establishment of a Regional Spatial Data Platform
04. Participation into global initiatives: a view from the region 4.1. The Global Call to Action on Indigenous and Community Land Rights (GCA), 4.2 The Land Matrix Initiative (LMI) 4.3 Women land rights: alternative reporting 4.4 Land and environmental defenders 4.5 ILC Global work on Indigenous Peoples
05. Communication, learning and monitoring in Asia
5.1 Communications
06. Regional Governance 6.1. Regional governance 6.2. Resource mobilization
07. Implemented budget (as of November 2016)
ASIA
INDEX01
05
05
05
07
09
11
13
15
17
18
18
19
21
22
27
28
30
30313334
36
37
37
393943
43
ASIA
Amidst these challenges, the implementation of ILC Asia work focused on a single country through NES are promising. Partners in development and government officials in six NES countries in Asia since the launching of this initiative in 2012, are beginning to recognize the role of ILC members in each country to support pro-poor land policies. Through tireless efforts and combination of connect-mobilise-influence of the members, the land agendas are back on the tables of the governments, although resistance from the landed elites are persistence.
02
BACKGROUND/overview from RC
The 2016 ILC Asia Workplan and Budget as the integral part of the 2016 ILC Global Workplan and
Budget has been approved by the Coalition Council in December 2015 and by ILC Asia Steering Committee
(ASC) in February 2016. ILC Asia Steering Committee finally requested the Regional Coordination Unit (RCU)
and the ILC Global Secretariat (Secretariat) to work together to amend both the narrative and the financial
Regional Workplan so as to reflect the completeness of ILC work in Asia in 2016.
As the new element of ILC work, working across countries around 10 commitments are very challenging.
Although members are aware of the added value of working together as the member of ILC that shared the
same commitment, to translate this into action is not easy. Some members even requested to regroup during
2016 Asia Regional Assembly to refine their related CBI proposal. Therefore, more technical support is needed
to finalise the CBI proposals, as we are approaching the end of the year.
The new component of ILC work starting 2016 under the new ILC Strategy 2016-2021 is Commitment-Based Initiatives (CBIs), where members across countries are expected to work together around 10 commitments of People-Centred Land Governance (PCLG). Under the ILC Strategy 2016-2021, CBIs and National Engagement Strategies (NES –focused on a single country) are the two principle ways in which member collaboration is supported.
01
01
To highlight some achievements from the
works of the members in relation to NES, are the
following: in India, members were able to influence
the Gujarat Government to withdrew its decision on
fencing common lands; in Bangladesh, members
were able to collect alternative proposals to the
Government’s Forest Amendment Act; in Cambodia,
community members, especially women and youth,
played an important role in mobilizing their villages
to share and discuss issues and to bring them to the
attention of local authorities at commune and
district levels; in Indonesia, wider civil society
platform called KNPA worked together to develop
their position consultatively in the White Paper, and
NES members have now been identified as key CSO
spokespeople, intervening in important government
processes for developing policy going forward.
Members in the Philippines already possessed a
strong platform, owing to years of working
cooperatively on land reform and related issues in
the country. Therefore, much of the connecting
work undertaken by members has been in
connecting with non-NES members of civil society
and government, including ‘champions’ in the
Philippine Legislature to lobby the government and
achieve specific outcomes regarding policy. Such
engagement also extended to the National Land
Use Act campaign, as well as the Land
Administration Reform Act process where
members came together to develop a common
position; in Nepal, 521 families have received
Joint Land Ownership covering an area of
192.33 ha of land. This has also enabled women to
own land. This greatly changes household and
social power dynamics and reduces the level of
gender injustices suffered by women.
03
Asia members are also very active involving in the ILC Global Initiatives such as Global Call to Action on
Indigenous and Community Land Rights (GCA), the Land Matrix Initiative (LMI), Alternative reports to CEDAW,
Land and Environment Defenders (LED), and Global works of ILC on Indigenous Peoples. Through
communication, learning and M&E, members are communicating each other and sharing perspectives and
experiences both through direct interaction such as Regional Assembly and Asia Land Forum and online media
like ILC Asia Newsletter and MemberNet, ILC Asia Twitter and Facebook.
Participation of Asia members in the Regional events such as Asia Land Forum and Regional Assembly are also
encouraging. In 2015, 100 percent attended the Regional Assembly, while in 2016, almost 100 percent
attended (43 out of 45 members). Membership fees payment in Asia is the highest in all regions.
On the Commitment Based Initiatives (CBI), Asia members are implementing Rangelands
Initiative Asia (Commitment # 3 Diverse Tenure Systems), Advancing Indigenous Peoples’ land rights
recognition (Commitment # 5 Secure territorial rights for Indigenous Peoples), Ensuring gender justice
in the land rights movement (Commitment # 4 Equal land rights for women), mainstreaming land rights
as human rights (Commitment # 10 Protected land rights defenders and Commitment # 9 Effective
actions against land grabbing), and Establishment of a Regional Spatial Data Platform (Commitment #
8 Transparent and accessible information).
04
ConnectThe NES platform in India has grown last year, and as of today can count on more than 30 implementing
partners and a much higher number of organisations, researchers and movements collaborating and
consulting on issues prioritised by ILC members. Connections with local government and magistrates,
particularly for the commons component, are also established and regularly taking place. Several meetings and
conferences have taken place at regional and national levels, allowing to build new alliances and join forces for
common objectives. Those on Commercial Pressures on Land, that brought together an average of 100 actors
per event in Kerala, Gujarat and Delhi, and the one launching the process for a policy on the commons, also
held in Delhi in March, are significant examples.
MobiliseSeveral campaigns, meetings and trainings have been organised this year, overall involving, particularly for
what concerns the mobilisations, thousands of people and organisations. These again focused on promoting
the drafting of a National Level Policy on the Commons, on campaigning for cancelling the resolution on
Grazing Lands in Gujarat or restoring pro-poor provisions in the LARR, or on raising awareness on existing land
related laws such as the LARR and other legal texts, on the Forest Rights Act and related procedures for
application, both to inform communities and to train staff of NGOs and various movements. Communities have
also been trained on the FAITH gardens to improve household food security and in the frame of the work on
the FRA, a facilitation centre has been established in the Kaimur District to assist villagers in filing claims under
FRA. Finally, around the CPL priority, more than 300 participants from various institutions have been mobilised
and a compendium on land acquisitions in India has been published and is now available for activists to
support advocacy against land grabbing.
InfluenceThrough mobilisation and national campaigns, members were able to influence a decision by the Gujarat
Government who withdrew its decision of fencing common lands, and to reassert the LARR as it originally was
in 2013.
In India NES contributed to Commitments: 1, 3, 5, 9
06
CONNECT-MOBILIZE-INFLUENCE (CMI) in NES Countries There are 6 NES processes ongoing in the region following countries: Bangladesh; Cambodia; India;
Indonesia; Nepal and the Philippines. More recently in Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia, members have met to discuss
how to engage into a NES process.
2.1.1. INDIA
2.1. NES Countries
Highlights
The NES India focuses its efforts in different thematic areas, including securing the commons, forests,
Livelihoods and land acquisitions.
Particularly worth mentioning this year the
successful restoring of the original provisions
of 2013 LARR after the 2015 cancellation of
pro-villagers provision thanks to mass
mobilization; the blockage of Gujarat
government resolution on Grazing Land of
2015, resulting in more than 557 family and
3675 pastoralist and marginalized
community members not losing their more
than 1200 acres of land; the beginning of a
large consultative process to advocate for a
National Policy on Commons and the
publication of a compendium on land
acquisition cases in India.
05
02
Highlights
2.1.2. BANGLADESH
Joining a regional discussion on forest laws, NES Bangladesh co-leading member ALRD organized a roundtable to discuss, share and collect alternative proposals to the Government’s Forest Amendment Act, 2015. The 148 participant including environmentalists, indigenous leaders, land rights defenders and policy makers agreed on the need to make an Indigenous People and forest dwellers friendly reform similarly to the India’s Forest Rights Act, 2006.
07
Connect NES Bangladesh members – ALRD, CDA, ARBAN and Kapaeeng Foundation - created opportunities for dialogue,
mutual learning and joint action by organizing a number of seminars, roundtables and conferences involving
institutional stakeholders and other organizations beyond the NES Platform. For instance, as part and host of the
secretariat of the Water Rights Forum (which includes Nijera Kori, BNPS, Nagorik Uddyog, BELA, Incidin Bangladesh,
and CCDB), ALRD organized the National Water Rights Conference on 20-21 March 2016. Among other keynote
speakers, there was the Ministry of Water Resources Anisul Islam Mahmud and other special guests such as AKM
Fazlul Haque, member of the parliamentary standing committee on Water Resources Ministry; and Md Yasin Ali,
member of the parliamentary standing committee on the Environment and Forests Ministry.
Mobilise The NES platform meeting on 22 December 2015, was the occasion for the 21 partners and other concerned
organization to discuss coordinated initiatives on marginalized communities’ land rights to prevent land
grabbing. The participants agreed on joint mobilisations through direct dialogue with institutions and other
stakeholders, connection with the National Human Rights Commission and creation of pressure groups at the
district level.
Influence Within the NES Bangladesh work plan, a three-days training on “Land Use Policy and Protection of Agricultural
Land” was organizing in Dhaka from 26-28 April 2016. The participation of government representatives from
the Ministry of Land, NGO Affairs Bureau of Bangladesh and local authorities granted the opportunity to
strengthen their relationship with civil society actors and to recognize grassroots organizations as key
interlocutors and partners in achieving land governance for and with people.
In Bangladesh, NES contributed to Commitments: 1, 5, 9
08
Highlights
Connect Building on the experience gained in the partnerships with MLMUPC and MOE during its first year of
implementation, NES Cambodia further engaged with the MAFF and the MOI.
Supported by ILC, Steering committee members of NES Cambodia – GVO, RAO, NGO Forum, WVC and ADIC –
extended their outreach by involving other local key organizations such as CHRAC, CMDP, UPDWD, CVS and
KKKHRDA. This extended network of cooperating organizations engaged with key ministries like the MAFF and
the MLMUPC, building and improving relationship and trust between government institutions and civil society
organizations.
At the regional level, NES Cambodia co-leading organization STAR Kampuchea joined the Land Watch Asia
campaign by providing data on land monitoring collected at the national level.
2.1.3. NES CAMBODIA
The attitude of the national and
local government institutions towards
the NES Platform improved resulting in
a more active and responsive
collaboration. The engagement went
beyond the activities planned under the
NES Cambodia: the parties also
cooperated on the occasion of the Joint
Forum on Youth, Land and Housing
Rights and of the National Consultation
Workshop on Land Conflict Resolution
Mechanism and they jointly hold
consultations on the “Land Use and
Analysis for zoning and mapping on land
use technical guidelines”. Community
members, especially women and youth,
played an important role in mobilizing
their villages to share and discuss issues
and to bring them to the attention of
local authorities at commune and
district levels.
09
Influence
Mobilise NES Cambodia have been supporting land affected communities through evidence based advocacy and
legal assistance in Banteay Meanchey and Svay Rieng provinces. As a result, seven victims were released
from detention centre and local and national authorities committed to resolve the land conflicts in the
provinces.
concerns and provide inputs to government officers who recognized them as necessary interlocutors and
partners in achieving land governance for and with people.
The long awaited issue of the draft Law on
Agricultural Land Use and Management
was delayed by the MAFF to carry on more
consultations with the involved
stakeholders. NES Cambodia took this
opportunity to include civil society actors
such as its cooperating organizations and
farmers representatives in this process.
As a result, community members and
target populations could raise their
10
communities’ experiences, members came together in workshops and effectively developed a research report.
Members seek to understand how the MP2EI relates to the Widodo governments’ mid-term national
development planning. Finally, mobilisations also took the form of mass mobilisations to influence the Land Bill
draft being prosed and discussed by the Indonesian government. Concerned civil society organisations
connected around the KNRA alliance developed out of the KNRA conference, and rejected the Land Bill draft,
as it was not in line with the Basic Agrarian Law (BAL) 1960 and the principles developed by this alliance.
Influence
NES members as the KNRA alliance mobilised around a number of public hearings which successfully
influenced the government, by ensuring that in its contemporary form, the Land Bill Draft would not be passed.
Beyond Parliament, NES members continue to connect around the development of a Ministry of Agrarian
Affairs and Spatial Planning/BPN proposal for a President’s Regulation on Agrarian Reform Implementation
(Perpres RA). Lead organisation, KPA connected with AMAN in order to intervene on the drafting of the Perpres
RA, and have now been given a key seat at the negotiating table, with ample room to influence
decisions-makers with a CSO version of the Perpres RA that has been developed.
Members have come together for the promotion of a National Commission for Agrarian Reform and Agrarian
Conflicts Resolution, mobilising to prepare a policy brief, organizing public discussions about the need for a
new institution, and undertaking mass-mobilisations in order to influence policy-makers through the KNPA
alliance which has developed from the aforementioned KNRA conference. Advocacy has been mainly aimed at
the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning. Advocacy on this matter continues, as preliminary
recommendations by CSO groups has been rejected and the Ministry has asked groups to utilise the existing
means of conflict mediation which has been deemed by members to be inadequate.
In Indonesia, NES activities contributed to Commitments: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10
12
Connect
Indonesian members worked collaboratively in a number of ways,
through the year to September 2016. In a spirit of broad
collaboration across civil society, they worked within the KNPA
alliance in order to consolidate a CSO position on agrarian reform
in the country with a coherent vision for change in government
policy and implementation. This wider civil society platform
worked together to develop their position consultatively in the
White Paper, and NES members have now been identified as key
CSO spokespeople, intervening in important government
processes for developing policy going forward.
2.1.4. NES INDONESIA
Mobilise Members mobilised their expertise, to consolidate a platform to clarify a CSO position on the controversial
MP3EI development plan. Using a consultatory evidence-based approach which was informed by local
This mobilisation of expertise also took the form of trainings undertaken by members, to improve
advocacy skills, increase women’s ability to participate in agrarian reform, and for affected communities
to undertake participatory mapping. Members therefore effectively connected with local people who
could benefit from training on these matter, in order to strengthen capacities including those for
advocacy, to improve awareness and facilitate the implementation of people-centred land governance
from the bottom up.
11
Connect Members in the Philippines already possessed a strong platform, owing to years of working cooperatively on
land reform and related issues in the country. Therefore, much of the connecting work undertaken by
members has been in connecting with non-NES members of civil society and government, including
‘champions’ in the Philippine Legislature to lobby the government and achieve specific outcomes regarding
policy. For example, members developed a post-CARPer scenario, calling for a Draft Bill law on Agrarian Reform
and Rural Development, for which a position paper was developed. Philippine members also came together to
call for the issuing of a new administrative order to speed up delineation of municipal waters for the 864 costal
delineation pending in the Philippines. Such engagement also extended to the National Land Use Act
campaign, as well as the Land Administration Reform Act process where members came together to develop a
common position.
Mobilise Members have mobilised to advocate for the extension of CARPer, mobilising support widely, including through
the national mobilisation Lakbayan ng Magsasaka. This was successful to some extent in influencing
policy-makers in the Philippines legislature, but members’ efforts were unfortunately hampered by the
Philippine electoral cycle, which effectively put a brake on enactment.
Mobilisation has also entailed a mobilisation of member resources, with members for example organising paralegal trainings, or organising learning experiences for its fisherfolk member organisations. This has also entailed the enhancement of the basic sector’s
capacities to demand and defend their rights and resources, with members building a curriculum together,
pilot testing the curriculum, and using this learning programme to inform the national land use database.
Also, members came together to enhance skills and competencies on conflict management and resolution to enable members to better defend their own territories. Such trainings were
also carried out on negotiation, the latter systematising expertise within the NES platform and establishing
campaign clinics.
In this second sense, members have mobilised their expertise to develop a comprehensive and coherent land
data system which in the first instance strengthens the land monitoring work being carried out, but is also
intended to influence policy and advocacy work by providing a sound evidential basis for claims. Specifically, the
work that has been carried out attempts to complement previous work which was undertaken that was for IP
territories with spatial data regarding agrarian reform.
Members have also mobilised to contribute cases related to human rights violation to farmers, fisherfolks, and
indigenous people in preparing the 2014 CSO land reform monitoring report. Providing a landscape view of
resource conflicts affecting agrarian, ancestral and coastal areas, the report delivered an evidence-based
approach in pursuing advocacies for the three sectors.
2.1.5. NES Philippines
13
NES Philippines members were also supported to participate in lobbying and advocacy activities including in
CLUP Now Campaign activities such as network meetings, strategy sessions, technical working group, and
committee hearings in senate to influence decisions-makers to pass the NLUA.
Influence Through these various activities, it was members’ intention to influence a number of the policy frameworks
mentioned above, but policy breakthroughs were hampered by factors beyond members’ control, and efforts
to influence the Philippine government’s land agenda have been renewed in the NES 2016 proposal.
On another note, the NES has engaged the Commission on Human Rights for the proposed follow-up work on
addressing human rights violation brought by resource conflicts.
In the Philippines, NES activities contributed to all Commitments: 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8
14
Connect Throughout the period, NES members have increased their advocacy in civil society, with collaborative work
which has enhanced civil society voice within Nepal. This has led to the aforementioned policy process wins,
particularly in being welcomed to the land-related policy drafting committee, enabling members to have a
greater say in the content of policies which affect land rights in the country. Furthermore, NES members have
reported the following as successful outcomes of engagement with policy-makers and relevant actors,
providing a sense of the vibrancy with which members have been acting in NES Nepal.
Facilitation and coordination of the National VGGT Workshop.
Involvement in the revision of the land use policy, amendment of land reform act, guthi
act, birta act, and National Land Policy.
Debating and including land issues in relation to the constitution.
Tenancy, Birta, Guthi policy is under revision.
Intervention on the debate around the land use policy at the academic level, as well as
at the policy level.
The publication and wide dissemination of the Joint Land Ownership report.
Engagement with more than 2000 policymakers involved in the policy debate
Mobilise Mobilisations have taken a number of forms. Firstly, NES members have come together to mobilise their
expertise on land in a number of ways. NES members have undertaken research and developed a Joint Land
Ownership and Women’s Land Entitlement study, which has now been widely published and circulated.
Members have mobilised their joint resources to develop a final document on Common Property Resources
and the Poor with Policy Analysis of the gaps in forest tenure rights and case studies on violation of inter and
intra group forest tenure rights of community forest user groups. Finally, research was undertaken on
Innovative Pro-poor land governance was disseminated among 115 participants in two districts. This has been
written up as a report, and been the focal point of national level workshops
16
2.1.6. NES NEPAL
Highlights While local government institutions remain weak, NES
members in Nepal have nevertheless made great
headway in facilitating people-centred land
governance in the country. At the level of legal
frameworks, NES members successfully advocated
the inclusion of land issues in the draft constitution.
Importantly, they have been included in the
land-related policy drafting committee giving civil
society a larger voice at the policy-negotiating table. At
the level of individual land rights, members have been
actively reaching out to raise awareness about land
rights. With the facilitation of CSRC and NLRF, a total
of 315 families received 36.5 ha land. This has meant
that shelter has been secured and has provided a
basis for access to public services like bank loans,
electricity and the undertaking of livelihood initiatives
for families. Additionally, a total of 762 land-poor
families have utilized 57.78 ha of public land for the
long-term purpose to improve their livelihoods.
After receiving access to the land, the families have begun to undertake agricultural production like vegetable
farming, fishery. Furthermore, 521 families have received Joint Land Ownership covering an area of
192.33 ha of land. This has also enabled women to own land. This greatly changes household and
social power dynamics and reduces the level of gender injustices suffered by women.
15
Secondly, the land rights movement facilitated by NES members has emerged as an active and influential civic
group representing people's voices and concerns. The group mobilized 35,000 land-poor people from 44
districts demanding a new constitution especially embedding provisions for land rights. They also held dialogue
with senior political leaders, reminding them of their long-standing commitment for land reform and
comprehensive peace accord. The very group held a dialogue with the parliamentary committee on agriculture
and water resources and urged there to be land and agrarian reform in Nepal. The chair of the committee has
provided a positive response and extended assurances in this regard.
Influence NES members have been encouraged by the greater responsiveness of the government to civil society actors.
This has included continued and expanded opportunities to consult with the Government of Nepal (GoN). For
example, the GoN has nominated six land rights leaders in the Landless Problem Solving Committee and NES
member, NLRF has continued on the Steering Committee on formulating national land policy. Furthermore,
NES members have been approached by the GoN and international agencies like the UNDP, International
Organization for Migration (IoM), Niti Foundation among others, for their knowledge and information about
good practices on land and agrarian reforms at the national and international levels.
NES members have provided inputs on several policy documents including the amendment of Land Reform Act
6th amendment and formulation of new Land Acquisition Act and ToR for Landless Problems Solving
Commission. On top of this, NES member CSRC has provided inputs on the agriculture development policy
during this period.
With the lobbying of NES member CSRC, the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights
(ICESCR) Committee recommended that the GoN implement the land reform on behalf of landless, tenant and
women farmers. Similarly, the committee also directed to the government of Nepal to implement the policy on
women's access to land, land rights of Dalits and indigenous people, and housing rights of the people with no
forced evictions.
In Nepal, NES activities contributed to Commitments: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8
ILC members in Kyrgyzstan met in Bishek City and organised initial meeting to start connecting each other and
mapping relevant stakeholders and processes that would allow a NES Strategy make a difference in the
country. Members in Mongolia also shared their interest to initiate NES process in their country.
2.1.7. NEW NES IN ASIA
17
3.1.Diverse tenure systems : Rangelands Initiative Asia
The following summarize the anticipated short-term outcomes of the Rangelands Initiative for 2016-2017:
1. Strengthened cooperation between ILC members and other partners such as:
• Governments, engaged through NES platforms where in place;
• Regional organisations, like SASEC (South Asia sub-Regional Economic Organization) and CAREC
(Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Organization);
• Other existing platforms, such as Maldhari Vikas Sangthan (Pastoralist Alliance), and SAPA (South
Asia Pastoral Alliance);
• Corporate sector;
2. Mapping and scoping study prepared and consolidated
3. Regional Strategy developed with clear and strengthened engagement of Asia Rangelands platform.
4. Sharing of experiences and lessons learned. As part of the communications strategy, activities in the
next 6 months shall cover:
• Creation of a dedicated website which will be established and managed by MARAG
• An Asia section of a bi-monthly ILC Rangelands e-bulletin and contributions to an annual
hard-copy bulletin on Making Rangeland Secure (available also in SPA and FR)
• Use social media including Twitter to share information on rangelands land issues.
• Contributions to Making Rangelands Secure publication sets including Issue Papers, Manuals
Reports and Briefs.
• Presentation of papers at international conferences (e.g. World Bank Poverty and Land
Conference (annual).
With the goal of building a network of organisations
to protect the diverse tenure and production
systems upon which pastoral and other rural
peoples’ livelihood depends, the Rangelands
Initiative has gathered 11 ILC members from Central
Asia (lead by JASIL) and South Asia (lead by MARAG).
18
CONNECT-MOBILIZE-INFLUENCEacross countries in the region03
• Establishing and maintaining linkages with other information sharing rangelands-focused
networks, including Pastoralist Knowledge Hub (FAO) and Land Portal and Land Matrix.
There is clear evidence to suggest that rangelands will increasingly get attention in the coming years –e.g
the campaign to declare a UN International Year of Pastoralists and Rangelands–. The Rangelands Initiative
Asia is already involved through lobbying with the Mongolian government to support the initiative. The
initiative will look for complimentary funds for activities that committed members have been
implementing, as well as cost-sharing. A fundraising strategy will be further developed in 2016-17. The
mapping of ILC members and their current donor relations that will be carried out with scoping study over
the next six months will feed into this.
3.2. Advancing Indigenous Peoples’ land rights recognition
This initiative lead by AIPP (Asia
Indigenous Peoples Pact) brings together
ILC member and partner organizations to
collaborate and work hand in hand to
advancing the recognition of indigenous
peoples’ land rights in Asia region through
evidenced based advocacy. It's also an
effort to support the Global Call to Action
on Indigenous and Community Land
Rights).
This project aims to contribute to existing
initiatives where ILC members are heavily involved
such as the Geospatial Data Initiative in Asia led by
PAFID as well as the Land Mark Initiative. In
addition, data on land grabbing produced through
the intervention of this project will be shared
widely to ILC members and network, more
importantly in supporting the Land Matrix
initiative facilitated by the AFA. This initiative in
particular is contributing significantly to NES
agendas through supporting multi-stakeholder
platform for policy dialogue and knowledge
sharing among others.
19
The strategic objectives of this initiative are the following, accompanied by the activities planned for the first
year of implementation:
1. CONNECT: Raise awareness of and enhance support to indigenous peoples’ organizations and
communities by the wider civil society organizations and networks, media and academic
institutions on issues relating to the land rights of indigenous peoples.
• Establish a civil society platform for advocacy on land rights of indigenous peoples at
regional level;
2. MOBILISE: Increase the capacity of indigenous peoples and civil society and social movements in
Asia for advocacy of IPs land rights.
• Produce and disseminate information materials including documentation of the status of
indigenous peoples’ land rights in Philippines, Nepal, India and Cambodia
• Provide technical and financial support to indigenous communities for community
mapping trainings in Philippines and India
• Produce community maps through standardized methodology in Philippines and India;
• Conduct regional learning exchange workshops
3. INFLUENCE: Strengthen and sustain the advocacy and campaign of indigenous peoples on their
land rights in partnership with wider civil society organizations and networks to engage with
governments and private sector at different levels using evidence based materials, especially for
the recognition of their customary lands in law and practice.
• Provide support to community mobilization and campaign activities, including specific
campaigns against project violating indigenous peoples’ land rights and their right to Free,
Prior and Informed Consent in Philippines, Nepal, India and Cambodia
20
Equal access to land and other resources in the Asia region. The objectives of this initiative are the
following:
• To enhance leadership capacities of women leaders promoting land rights for women at the
micro and macro level through usage of sensitization and awareness-building tools, exchange of
ideas, sharing of best practices, exposure facilities.
• To effectively use documentation with regard to gender segregated data on land rights to build
advocacy at local, national and regional level.
• To influence advocacy actions on Women’s Land Rights through knowledge sharing and exchange
among ILC members and others interested in the issue.
Member organizations of ILC belonging to countries in the Asian region take positive initiatives to ensure equal
land rights advocacy, awareness, implementation, monitoring which aims to initiate positive actions on behalf
of the government and other stakeholders. Also to install capacities in the local social systems so that they take
initiatives in their respective situations to ensure a gradual situation of gender justice with regard to ownership,
control, monitoring, management and decision-making on land and land-based issues faced by women.
Women’s Land Rights is such a crucial issue that it is an inherent cross cutting issue for all the 9 other
commitments – both at the local, national, global and regional level. The contribution of women being
maximum towards land based initiatives, it becomes obvious that whether strong small scale farming
systems or inclusive decision making or any other commitment, the participation of women is crucial.
Unless women are a part and process of securing the rights, the purpose of securing land rights for all would
be incomplete. On the other hand, as a part of this commitment 4, thrust would be on improving awareness,
advocacy and capacity building on the broad aspects of all the other commitments. In order to promote a
holistic approach towards women’s land rights it is important to generate information and awareness on all of
the issues covered in the commitments.
3.3. Ensuring gender justice in the land rights movement
Despite all these progress in Asia in terms of women’s
land rights, there has been no efforts done so far in
finding complementarities of each in order make the
impact bigger and significant at a regional scale. The
existence of these national programs could be
utilized and maximized starting with constant and
effective knowledge management mechanisms
which include learning exchanges, among others.
21
Other ILC members involved in the initiative are SAINS, RMI (Indonesia); ABHIYAN, CSRC (Nepal), PWESCR, BJSA,
SDF, SDDPA, AIPP (India); FNN, Star Kampuchea (Cambodia); and ARBAN (Bangladesh). The Highlander
Association of Cambodia and the Cambodian Indigenous Youth Association are also involved.
Hosted by ANGOC (Philippines) in September 2016 this initiative aims to contribute to ILC’s strategic
objective of Connecting (members to each other and change-makers beyond the Coalition, creating
opportunities for dialogue, mutual learning, and joint action) as well as enhance the governance and
institutional processes of the Asia regional platform. 2016 is an important year for the International Land
Coalition as it marks the start of the implementation of its 5-year institutional strategy. Building on the 2015
Asia Regional Assembly, this year will be convened to update the implementation of the work plan and the new
ILC strategic framework. The overall objective for the Asia Land Forum will be to provide an opportunity
for the members to share tools, approaches and strategies in protecting land rights.
3.4 2016 Asia Land Forum and Asia Regional Assembly
22
As for the Asia Regional Assembly, the meeting shall review the implementation of the strategic framework and
discuss institutional concerns.
At the end of the two events, it is expected that:
Members and partners have enhanced their capacities in land rights advocacy through sharing of
experiences;
Reviewed and reframed (if needed) the three-year work plan of ILC Asia; and
Increased solidarity among ILC Asia members and partners.
Asia Land Forum on 5 September 2016 in the morning session aimed at engaging the Philippine government
on its land agenda. These including the policy settings on: Notice of Coverage (NOC) extension bill, Indigenous
Community Conservation Areas (ICCA) bill, and National Land Use Act (NLUA). Therefore, the theme of the
morning of Asia Land Forum (ALF) is “Shaping the Land Agenda in the Philippines”.
While in the afternoon session, members from Asia region and network beyond Asia shared the experiences
and perspectives in achieving food security through advancing land rights. Experiences and perspectives from
global members of ILC and other network such as FAO, ADB, IFAD Philippines, and the World Bank and also the
speech of the Vice President of the Philippines among others also enlightened the Asia Land Forum. Official
Representatives from Cambodia and Nepal shared the views of their governments on the issues of food
security in their respective land policies.
As the collective efforts, the Asia Land Forum produced “The Ortigas Declaration” which has the following
principles:
The CSO participants to the Asian Land Forum 2016, representing farmers, fisherfolk, indigenous peoples, civil
society organizations, and land rights advocates from Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines and Thailand, strongly call upon concerned States,
institutions and corporations to respect and adhere to the following principles:
23
Respect, protect and strengthen the land rights of women and men living in poverty, ensuring that no one is deprived of the use and control of the land on which their well-being and human dignity depend on;
Ensure equitable land distribution and public investment that supports small-scale farming systems;
Recognize and protect the diverse tenure and production systems upon which people’s livelihoods depend, including the communal and customary tenure systems of smallholders and indigenous peoples;
Ensure gender justice in relation to land, taking all necessary measures to enhance the ability of women to defend their land rights and take equal part in decision-making;
Respect and protect the inherent land and territorial rights of the indigenous peoples, as set out in ILO Convention 169 and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;
Enable the role of the local land users in territorial and ecosystem management, recognizing that ustainable development and the stewardship of ecosystems are best achieved through participatory decision-making; and management at the territorial level;
Ensure that processes of decision-making over land are inclusive, so that policies, laws, procedures, and decisions concerning land adequately reflect the rights, needs, and aspirations of individuals and communities who will be affected by them;
Ensure transparency and accountability, through unhindered and timely public access to all information that may contribute to informed public debate and decision-making on land issues at all stages;
Prevent and remedy land grabbing, respecting traditional land use rights and local livelihoods, and ensuring that all large-scale initiatives that involve the use of land, water, and other natural resources comply with human rights and environmental obligations; and
Respect and protect the civil and political rights of human rights defenders working on land issues.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
24
On the issues of the amendments of ILC
Charter, during the Asia Regional Assembly
members contributed to the following six
areas:
(1) Regional Platform-article 49 and 50;
(2) Regional Assemblies-new;
(3) Regional Steering Committees-new;
(4) Regional Coordination Units-new;
(5) National Platforms-new; and
(6) Secretariat-article 54 and 55).
Meanwhile, on the issues of membership
strategy, ILC Asia members presented the
results of their discussions as stated below:
GROWTH, SIZE, & SUSTAINABILITY
TYPE & EFFECTIVENESSDISTANCE FROM STATE & PRIVATE SECTOR
Private sector and government must not
be considered members of ILC but may
be considered as part of the National
Engagement Strategies
INGOs and donors must be tapped at the
national level
ILC needs like-minded, action-oriented
organizations, policy research organizations
and social movements, CSOs, CBOs, NGOs,
IPs, grassroot level organizations, human
rights organizations, livelihood-based
organizations
Alternative media organizations and legal
support organizations are seen very
important
Countries suggested in the priority list: Laos,
Myanmar, Vietnam, Timor Leste, China,
Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan.
However, is important to consider the
political situation in the country. Favorable if
the country has progressive land rights.
Must also look at existing competencies and
objectives of members at the country level
and see what organizations could
compliment growth or will lead to the
achievement of their goals
Need to monitor effectiveness of members
through M&E and set of indicators
Encourage members’ members to apply
Sustainability, vibrancy, engagement and
working together is more important than
size and growth
To increase membership, ILC must
enhance the movement
Diversity of membership is important
Expansion is good in maintaining vibrancy
and engagement of members
ILC Asia may consider 10% growth every 3
years
Number of members may be increased
based on issues the region wants to solve
(e.g. agrarian reform, gender, IPs). No
optimum size.
26
ILC Asia Regional Assembly that conducted on 6-8 September 2016 after the Asia
Land Forum been attended by 43 out of 45 members in Asia region. Among key
achievements of the 2016 Asia Regional Assembly were: the approval of the Minutes of
2015 ILC Asia Regional Assembly, contribution from Asia members to the discussions on
the amendments of ILC Charter and membership strategy, almost 100 percent ILC Asia
members paid the membership fees, initial ideas of the workplan for 2017-2019 shared
among the members, and discussion on Asia regional strategy initiated. Status of regional
workplan implementation also shared among the members as part of the Regional
Assembly agenda, including the achievements and challenges of each program, mainly on
NES and CBI.
Tagaytay City, Philippines6-8 September 2016
25
On the issues of the amendments of ILC Charter, during the Asia Regional Assembly members contributed to the
following six areas:
(1) Regional Platform-article 49 and 50;
(2) Regional Assemblies-new;
(3) Regional Steering Committees-new;
(4) Regional Coordination Units-new;
(5) National Platforms-new; and
(6) Secretariat-article 54 and 55).
Meanwhile, on the issues of membership strategy, ILC Asia members presented the results of their discussions as
stated below: In term of decisions and agreements, several points were generated from the ILC Asia Regional
Assembly as below:
1. Convened a forum of Regional Assembly.
2. Approved the Minutes generated from the previous Regional Assembly (2015).
3. Reviewed and provided specific recommendation for 2015-2016 Asia Annual report.
4. Provided input on changes in the ILC Charter.
5. Online consultation will also be provided to the members by the RCU.
6. Provided input on the draft Membership Strategy.
7. Formulated the Regional Strategy in 2017-2018 Workplan
8. KPA presented the 2018 ILC GLF preparation steps, based on Mr. Iwan Nurdin’s request, we have
sent our input as well, because at the end of the day, the host of the 2018 GLF is not only Indonesia
or KPA, but Asia region will be the host.
In 2013, land monitoring report which focus on land conflicts was initiated. The workshop organized by
ANGOC, Star Kampuchea, and ILC Asia held in Cambodia in 2014 in order present the land monitoring
report. One of the recommendation generated from the report is to develop working paper to link land
with human rights, and to start recognize land as basic human rights internationally. That the purpose
of the proposal. Afterward, based on feedback gained from the ILC Secretariat, post the Regional Assembly
held in Chiang Mai, this initiative must be linked with the land right defender.
3.5 Mainstreaming Land Rights as Human Rights in the ASEAN and SAARC
27
The initiative is to prepare approach paper on how land can be included as human rights. There were two reports
being drafted, where one is designated for the South East Asia region, and the other one is designated for the South
Asia region. This report interest is on CBI #10 and is circulated to the South Asia members as CBI #10. Feedback
from South Asia members are now awaited. A workshop was held in August 2016 in Nepal, organized by CSRC, to
present the report.
Two regional approach papers are being drafted to depict the link of land as human rights. The Southeast paper is
being drafted by Dianto Bachriadi while the South Asia paper is being prepared by Professor Laya Prasad Uprety.
The regional workshop to present the reports (South Asia and South East Asia) will be held in Cambodia on 24-25
November 2016, organized by Star Kampuchea, ANGOC, Land Watch Asia (LWA) and ILC Asia.
3.6 Establishment of a Regional Spatial Data Platform
Lead by PAFID, this initiative shall build and sustain
previous initiatives and the consensus reached by
land rights advocates and support groups in the
Mapping Conference in Manila. While many
participants in the Manila Conference are affiliated
with the ILC-Asia (PAFID, PACOS-AIPP, JKPP,
BRIMAS-AIPP, KASAPI-AIPP), it is proposed that
invitations shall be broadened to include other
groups who have signified their interest and intent
to participate in activities addressing issues
regarding Commitment No. 8 (Transparent and
Accountable Information) of ILC’s People-Centered
Land Governance.
Lead by PAFID, this initiative shall build and sustain
previous initiatives and the consensus reached by
land rights advocates and support groups in the
Mapping Conference in Manila. While many
participants in the Manila Conference are affiliated
with the ILC-Asia (PAFID, PACOS-AIPP, JKPP,
BRIMAS-AIPP, KASAPI-AIPP), it is proposed that
invitations shall be broadened to include other
groups who have signified their interest and intent
to participate in activities addressing issues
regarding Commitment No. 8 (Transparent and
Accountable Information) of ILC’s People-Centered
Land Governance.
Transparent & Accessible Information
28
The long-term goal is to establish a regional platform to provide a venue and a system for communities and
land rights defenders to share information and gain access to relevant and critical spatial information in a
timely and effective manner. This initiative will link with the ILC initiative on Land and Environmental Defenders,
under commitment 10 and the created global reference group (including from Asia AIPP - KPA - RDF -
Kapaeeng Foundation).
The expected outcomes of this initiative are:
1. Formulation of a framework for regional data sharing network
2. Establishment of a Core Group to lead on the creation of the regional data sharing platform
3. Determined the gaps and limitations of current available maps and other land-related data
4. Secure, consolidate, and format appropriate spatial data into shareable media
5. Developed data sharing arrangements, systems, and protocols
6. Linking the database to monitoring the implementation of the Global Call to Action on
Indigenous and Community Land Rights
The Southeast Asia Sub-Regional Meeting on Spatial Data was convened in Manila, Philippines on 08 – 11
March 2016. The event brought together the practitioners of community mapping and advocates of land rights
in the sub-region. The Philippine Association for Intercultural Development (PAFID) hosted the event in
partnership with the International Land Coalition (ILC).
This meeting is part of a series of activities aimed at establishing a regional platform that would provide a
venue and a system for communities and land rights defenders to share and obtain access to relevant and
critical spatial information. PAFID implements these activities with support from the International Land
Coalition under the project “Establishment of a Regional Spatial Data Platform.”
The objectives of the meetings are as follows:
1. Assess the current state of their work on land tenure and community mapping of indigenous
and local communities;
2. Appraise what has been done since the 2005 Manila Community Mapping Conference, and evaluate
the validity and relevance of the agreements reached; and
3. Formulate a framework for the establishment of a sub-regional data sharing network.
A total of 17 representatives (6 females and 11 males) from various organizations and communities in
Southeast Asia participated in the meeting.
During the said meeting, the following agreements had been reached on ensuring the implications of sharing
data for the communities:
AGREEMENT: There should be an FPIC. Only get the data the community is willing to share.
AGREEMENT: Only the data which the community allows may be made public. The data that are useful will be
shared internally among advocates.
29
a collaborative initiative together with Oxfam and the Rights and Resources Initiative. The Steering Group
includes several other ILC members (FPP, AIPP, PIDP, LEMU, Namati, WRI, Huairou etc.), see
www.landrightsnow.org.
ILC Members signed up to the GCA in July 2016: Africa: 24 members; Asia: 44 members; LAC: 16 members;
Europe: 2 members. Highlights from 2016 include:
PARTICIPATION in GLOBAL INITIATIVES : a view from Asia
4.1. The Global Call to Action on Indigenous and Community Land Rights (GCA),
Launch of GCA short films demonstrating the work of ILC members(FES – India; CADPI – Nicaragua; ULA – Uganda, Community Land Scotland – Scotland, JASIL – Mongolia).
Rome Launch of the GCA: Presented the report: "COMMON GROUND ", screened short films, introduced the LANDmark map and colleagues from IFAD, CIFOR, WRI and FAOspoke about how they promote the land rights of Indigenous People and local communities.
Publication of the "Common Ground Report : Securing land rights and safeguarding the earth", flagship report for the Global Call to Action.
30
04
4.2 The Land Matrix Initiative (LMI)
In order to enhance the quality of the database, and to increase its relevance to decision-making processes at
regional and national level, the LMI has launched a process of decentralisation and expansion of its network, which
includes the appointment of 4 Regional Focal Points in Africa, Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe; and the
reinforcement and establishment of regional, national, and thematic Land Observatories.
The launch of an improved platform in September 2016 will allow for a more accurate overview of regional and
national trends and data. Collaboration with NES agendas is set as a priority for the coming years: the presence of
functional multi-stakeholder platforms offers an enabling environment for data collected to inform existing policy
processes and dialogue.
is a global and independent initiative that
monitors competition over land use in the
Global South. Its goal is to facilitate an open
community of citizens, researchers,
policy-makers, and technology specialists to
promote transparency and accountability in
decisions over land and land-based
investment.
The LMI at global level is coordinated by 5 partners: ILC;ILC members CDE and CIRAD;GIGA and GIZ.
Session/Round table discussion at the World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty on 'Global Call to Action'.
2016 August Mobilisation Week (2nd-9th): Video showing JASIL's work in Mongolia and policy brief
"Mobile Guardians: A Case for Securing Pastoralist Land Rights". There were over 40 events, largely grassroots, organised as part of mobilisation week, including by many ILC members (CERDET-Bolivia, RAJY-Mexico, CODECA-Guatemala, FUNDAPAZ-Argentina, Kapaeng Foundation-Bangladesh, JASIL-Mongolia, and many by the AIPP network, including Cordilera People Alliance and Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara/AMAN). During the week 46 new organizations signed up as did 877 individuals.
31
The database is widely used as a reference in global debates and development reports. It has been presented at the
World Bank Land and Poverty conference 2016, at CIRAD with representatives from the French Government, at
UNCCD, at the "Mountain of our future earth" conference, at the "African Faith and Justice Network" in Kenya, at the
International Civil Society Week 2016 in Colombia.
It was listed by The Guardian among the top 10 sources of data for international development research, and by
Food Think Tank as one of 15 organizations defending land rights.
It was also referred to in the article "The debate over big land data" by the Financial Times.
In the frame of the SDGs, the Land Matrix is producing vivid data to complement official statistics, add geographical
information and provide ideas for statistical capacity building. The LMI is already exchanging data with Open Land
Contract and is working with Land Mark on the integration of data layers on indigenous and community lands.
Land Matrix is also exploring concrete collaboration with Resource Contracts, monitoring contracts for mining deals,
and the Joint Research Center (European Commission) for Spatial data and analysis, satellite imagery. Data is also
used to produce country profiles in a growing number of countries to inform national debates.
Regional Focal Points play a key role in data collection, research, advocacy, networking and communications. The
Asia Focal Points are coordinated by AFA and JASIL.
Connect –Mobilise AFA and JASIL have been Regional Focal Points for Asia and Central Asia since 2014. At the end of 2015 the LMI
Steering Committee appointed AFA as Regional Partner, acknowledging the commitment shown in strengthening
the presence and relevance of the LMI at regional level. The LMI was presented during various regional events,
including the Regional Sharing on Popularizing the VGGT (Myanmar) and the "Mekong Region Land Governance
project" (MRLG). JASIL has established partnerships with organizations in Mongolia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, and
presented the Initiative during the Central-Asian co-management on pastureland workshop (Mongolia). ILC recently
signed one year grant with AFA to support activities in Asia and Central Asia in the framework of the global CBI on
Commitments 7-8-9. AFA will further collaborate with ILC members and farmer organizations participating in the
Medium Term Cooperation Program Phase Two (MTCP2) in the region. JASIL will collaborate with the Rangelands
Initiative, which will focus on increased tenure security of local rangeland users through improved implementation
of enabling policy and legislation.
32
Highlights since Chang Mai include:
ConnectCreation of a platform of members in order to elaborate the alternative report at national level.
Reinforcement of collaboration with organisations working with HR treaty bodies at global level.
Mobilise Data collection and data analysis at local and national level, including through workshops and dedicated
consultations.
• Argentina: data collection and analysis focuses on rights to land and natural resources of women living
in the Chaco Argentino region through 4 workshop focusing on indigenous and creole women and the
different issues they face
• Burundi: The analysis focuses on different component of women’s land rights; each component is
conducted by a different organisation; APDH focuses on land law concerning customary norms and
practices from gender perspective, including an analysis of existing administrative and normative
frameworks. CAPAD works on women’s access to assets in the process of improvement of
commercialization of agricultural products and creation of cooperatives. UNIPROBA focuses on issues
faced by Batwa women with regard to their access to and management of land and resources.
• Bangladesh: consultations take place in Rangamati, Dhaka (ARBAN), and Dinajpur (CDA).
Influence
Submission of alternative reports to CEDAW (session 65th, 24 October-18 November 2016)
Participation in CEDAW session in Geneva (1 person per country)
Reports to be used at national level for advocacy and planning
4.3 Women land rights: alternative reporting
33
Since its launch, the Land and environmental rights defenders fund in place in all regions; a global reference group
was activated by early 2016 and a dedicated web page is under construction on ILC website. In some cases, media
coverage and press release have been released. Major updates over the last few months to include:
Connect Reference group
• ILC members with a long experience and a strong expertise in the field of human rights protection are
involved in a reference group that aims at gathering expertise and knowledge concerning the protection
of land and environmental rights defenders.
• Members of the reference group met virtually (skype) on a regional basis.
• Their task is to play an active role in spreading information about opportunities for Land Defenders, assess
applications to the LED Fund and liaise with other human rights defenders organisations.
MobiliseLand Defenders Fund
• The fund aims at providing financial support to ILC members who face threats related to the defense of
land rights. Beneficiaries of the fund are ILC members.
• The LED fund is available in the three regions and it is managed by hosting organisations, in Asia managed
by KPA (Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria), the hosting organization of ILC Asia Regional Platform. under the
decentralization grant, addressed for activists and members of ILC who face criminalization on the ground.
This program presents to help and support ILC members and colleagues who face emergency situation on
criminalization.
4.4 Land and environmental defenders
34
The total fund every year is 10,000 USD, and will be distributed to organizations who submit applications.
RCU regularly announces through email, on how to submit emergency fund. In 2015, seven applications were
received, and four cases approved to receive the fund, therefore each applicant received 2,500 USD. The previous
process was once the RCU received an application, RCU will discuss internally with KPA, then will circulate the
application to the ASC members. After it is approved by the ASC, then the applicant will receive the fund. In 2015,
Asia platform approved Kapaeeng Foundation, ALRD, CSRC, and NLRF. One application approved in 2016, because
the other applications did not considered as emergency situation, such as food aid and legal aid.
In 2016, This year, the approval process changed. This year, LED Reference group must review first the applications.
In Asia, LED group consist of AIPP, KPA, Kapaeeng Foundation and RDF. The process has not yet been running well,
the fund is now less spend. Four applications have been approved, received from SCOPE, Abhiyan Nepal, and AIPP.
InfluenceLED platform
The platform involves ILC global secretariat and Global Witness. ILC global members involved in the reference group
play a relevant role in the activities of the platform. Its goal is to make violations suffered by land and environmental
defenders visible at global, regional and national levels and support advocacy. The platform involves a data base of
violations and threats suffered by LEDs which integrates Global Witness data base on killings of land and
environmental defenders. The platform also implies joint participation in key global human rights related events.
Until now 3 new cases from LAC (Trocaire) and 4 cases (beneficiaries of 2015 fund) from Asia have been
documented. A key lesson from Asia is the importance of a holistic approach with combination of direct support and
media support whereby the latter, as properly used, can help protect the defenders for a longer period.
35
4.5 ILC Global work on Indigenous Peoples
Mobilise: A paper on challenges and possible strategies to up-scale the use Community-based Monitoring and
Information Systems (CBMIS) was presented during the World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty in March
2016. Additionally, in support to the Global Call to Action and Landmark initiatives, the ILC, together with some
members and partners as AIPP, SONIA, CADPI, IFAD, FPP and RRI, organised a side event during the UNPFII with
the theme “The time is now! Global Call and Landmark, two innovative actions to secure Indigenous Peoples'
land rights” with around 70 participants from different regions, indigenous organisations and UN agencies.
Influence: In 2016 the ILC, together with FAO and IFAD, is co-chairing of the Inter-Agency Support Group (IASG) of the
United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). During the 15 session of the Forum, the three
organisations contributed to arrange different meetings, including a closed discussion with the members of the
Permanent Forum, in preparation for the IASG Annual Meeting to be held in Rome from 5 to 10 October 2016.
This would be a good opportunity to position indigenous land rights in the international agenda related to the
implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), ILO 169 and
the Outcome Document of the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples (WCIP), particularly in the definition
of indicators, the development of a UN System Wide Action Plan, and for better coordination and cooperation
within UN and multilateral institutions in some focus countries.
Complementary to ILC work in the region, ILC is also part of the Inter-Agency Support Group (IASG) of the United Nations
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). Some updates below.
36
COMMUNICATION, LEARNING & M&ECommunication activities in the region (publications, trainings, etc).
5.1 Communications
Summary Report: A Regional Forum on Land Administration and Management in Rural and Urban
Areas. The report was jointly published by ANGOC, ILC, KPA and GLTN and highlights the challenges
and opportunities of policy and project implementation of land administration and management in
Asia, with shared experiences from Nepal, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Philippines.
Land Acquisition and Land Alienation in India. Published by SDF, the cases described here discuss
the people affected and/or legislations involved, the story of struggle or litigation,
ecological-environmental issues, free prior informed consent (FPIC).
ILC Asia Regional Brochure- ILC Asia Regional Platform brochure finalised and shared.
Case Study: Group of Women in India Claim Rights and Services from the State- published by
Swadhina- the case study contributes to commitment 2 (strong small scale family farming) and
commitment 4 (equal land rights for women).
Four total case studies from India.
CONNECT
Since Jan2016, ILC AsiaTwitter followers have grown by
30%(now have upwards of 800 followers).
SOCIAL MEDIAILC ASIAon the rise:
Since Jan 2016,the account's potential reach has been
240,8 K(Twitter users that have come into contact with ILC Asia Tweets).
OUTREACHILC ASIAon the rise:
ASIAUsing Membernet: MEMBERS
470 NEW ASIA CONTACTS
have been added into the PUP since the beginning of the year.
newsletter list now hasILC Asia
317 subscribers and is now sent out on a regular(monthly) basis.
newsletters sent out since last year's meeting in Chiang Mai.8
ILC MEMBERSwill visit MemberNet,provide inputs to improve,review data & update where necessary from both."
Trainings provided during Chiang Mai
Regional Assembly. All members
provided with username and password.
Members recommended the inclusion
of stories of failure as well as success
stories, as much can be learnt
MOBILISE
INFLUENCE
• Two communications trainings provided:
- ILC Communications Planning Workshop during Asia Regional
Assembly and Knowledge Exchange 2015- an ILC Asia
Communications Plan was drafted for implementation (outlining
communications system, message, actors, and communications
products needed).
- NES Communications Workshop- During the December 2015
Council, a special side event was held for NES coordinators to
discuss the communications components of their platforms, to
express areas where they felt that they were exceling and areas
where they could use further support in communications facets.
Secretariat is now working with NES platforms to build further
trainings on their specific needs.
01 02
• Launch of four new publications from the region:
NES countries02 now online:
NES Bangladesh platform has now createda Facebook community and its own website.
Initial layout for NES Philippines website is now underway.
37 38
05
Summary of key decisions and agreements
1. Convened a forum of Regional Assembly.
2. Approved the Minutes generated from the previous Regional Assembly (2015).
3. Reviewed and provided specific recommendation for 2015-2016 Asia Annual report.
4. Provided input on changes in the ILC Charter.
5. Online consultation will also be provided to the members by the RCU.
6. Provided input on the draft Membership Strategy.
7. Formulated the Regional Strategy in 2017-2018 Workplan
8. KPA presented the 2018 ILC GLF preparation steps, based on Mr. Iwan Nurdin’s request, we have
sent our input as well, because at the end of the day, the host of the 2018 GLF is not only Indonesia
or KPA, but Asia region will be the host.
2016 Asia Land Forum & ILC Asia Regional Assembly (Manila and Tagaytay City, the Philippines, 5-8 September 2016)
40
Summary of Key decisions 1. There was 100% attendance of the members
For a complete and detailed account please refer to "ILC Asia RA and Knowledge Exchange
2015_Procedings and minutes", available on each member's profile on Membernet
2. New ILC Asia members were formally welcomed (eight new members): FNN (Cambodia), IESD
(Kazakhstan), KAFLU (Kyrgyzstan), Kapaeeng Foundation (Bangladesh), MALM (Mongolia), Prayatna
Samiti (India), PWESCR (India), and UWUA (Kyrgyzstan).
3. All members agreed to endorse the Global Call to Action on Indigenous and Community Land rights
through www.landrightsnow.org.
4. ILC will engage in the following activities: WFAL (World Forum on Access to Land), Jai Jagat 2020 of
BP and the 16 month foot-march from India to Geneva in 2019.
5. ILC engagement with VGGT will continue and be scaled up, including strategy and ways forward.
6. ILC Asia will continue gender mainstreaming including gender focus on all aspects of coalition
activities and strategies, including Membernet.
7. ILC Asia will continue emphasizing on capacity building activities, specifically for women, farmers’
organisations and rural communities in meeting the PCLGs in the next regional workplan.
Summary of Recommendations
• ILC to come up with indicators on land, to measure the implementation of the SDGs.
• ILC Asia should work towards developing a mechanism for pressure groups and consider integrating
a ‘blacklist’ of companies with bad practice.
• On LGBT rights (specifically transgender rights) as ILC’s work on gender in the region, countries where
there are very strong LGBTIQ movements, members should get in touch with the Oxfam office to look
at ways of collaboration.
• To review prohibitive laws, ILC Asia can conduct an evidence-based study to show that shifting
cultivation is tied to our community, customary institutions and self-governance.
• ILC Asia can engage, conduct advocacy and support research on large-scale business and human
rights, and development and extractive industries, to strengthen grassroots organisations.
• ILC Asia should emphasise inter-dialogues with multi-lateral institutions as well as further
engagement with the private sector.
• Use VGGT to monitor and to dialogue with new stakeholders in formulating pro-poor land policies or
implementing programs that contribute to PCLG.
GOVERNANCE6.1. Regional governance
2015 ILC Asia Regional Assembly And Knowledge Exchange(Chiang Mai, Thailand : 6-8 October 2015)
39
06
Asia Steering Committee (ASC) Meeting (27-28 February 2016)
Key decisions:
• KPA updated ASC members on the status of the 2015 Emergency Fund disbursement to four organizations
that have successful applications (ALRD, Kapaeeng Foundation, CSRC, NLRF) for a total of USD 10,000. The
Emergency Fund will take a new form in the Land and Environmental Defenders (LED) fund with an improved
system of application and a newly formed reference group.
• The ILC Director's letter to the ASC highlighted the following needs, which the ASC discussed and endorsed.
• The ASC announced that KPA was selected by the Coalition Council as the host for the 2018 Assembly of Members (AoM) and Global Land Forum (GLF), KPA enumerated their plans as narrated in their proposal. Proposed venue: Bandung, Indonesia
• The ASC agreed on hosting in the 2016 Regional Assembly and Land Forum in the Philippines.
• The ASC provided comments to the 2016 WP and Budget presented by the Regional Facilitator, indicating that it should better reflect the areas of a) strategic direction, b) management, and c) strengthening the platform and the RCU. The RCU was asked to re-submit a WP for 2016 by March 31st.
• The Asia regional strategy document for the year 2016-2021 was discussed. A general outline was suggested and it was agreed to present and discuss the document at the Regional Assembly 2016, to later have its final version approved by the 28th Coalition Council in December.
4 Main Areas ofChange in 2016 Needs
Capacity of RCUs
• Steering Committees to
develop a strategy to build
RCUs capability to deliver
performance indicators
• Regional Coordinators
(RCs) to develop a costed
Human Resource Plan
Accountability
• RCs to deliver annual
regional work plans
• RCs clear control of the
regional budget
• RCs responsible for building
the RCU team
• Asia Regional Strategy
Integrating the dispersed global team
• Operational mutual
accountability between
RCU and Global Secretariat
• Performance evaluation of
RCs: SCs decision, but will
have recommendations on
recruitment and performance
evaluation from the Global Sec
01
02
03
Financial management • Resource mobilization capacity of the region
04
Participants:
CSRC (JAGAT BASNET)– ASC CO-CHAIR;
ANGOC (DON MARQUEZ)– ASC CO-CHAIR;
ROWSHAN JAHAN MONI (ALRD);
MIRGUL AMANALIEVA (RDF)
IWAN NURDIN (KPA); DEWI KARTIKA (KPA);
STEFANO DI GESSA (ILC SECRETARIAT);
ANNA SAKURAI (ILC SECRETARIAT - ASIA DESK)
ERPAN FARYADI (ILC ASIA REGIONAL FACILITATOR);
ANNA BRILLANTE (ILC ASIA PIO)
01
0203040506
07
08
09
41 42
44
ILC ASIA MEMBERS :
OUR DONORS :“ILC is a Coalition, and would be ineffective without all those who contribute to finance our collective
efforts. All ILC members pay membership fees, and members also contribute in cash or in kind to
collaborative initiatives. We would also like to thank our Strategic Partners and Donors who provide
core support, guidance.”
IESDInstitute of Ecology and Sustainable Development
During the ASC meeting, the Regional Facilitator updated the ASC with on-going efforts to connect with INGOs and other donor agencies:
IMPLEMENTED BUDGET
REGION "ASIA" BUDGET Approved by CC & ASC %Budget Implemented
(Jan 2016 – November 2016)
CMI in NES countries
CMI across countries (CBIs)
CMI in Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning
CMI in comms
Strengthen ILC Financial capacity
TOTAL
$470,000 $301,661 64
$691,700 $343,478 50
$13,000 $10,000 77
$20,000 $11,000 55
$17,000 $9,500 56
$1,211,700 $675,639 56
6.2. Resource mobilization
No PARTNERSTHEMATIC AREAS OF
POSSIBLE COLABORATION INITIAL TALKS
Embassy of Sweden in Bangkok - Thailand
1 Environment and Human Rights in the framework of ASEAN integration
ILC Asia was invited to submit the initialconcept for further discussion (mid-2016)
SDC through MekongRegion Land Governance MRLG) - Laos
2 ‘State of Land’ Report in Mekong Region, Farmers land rights, and web portal
Develop joint initiatives with MRLG ascontributing partner
RRI (Rights and Resources Initiatives) Asia
4 Working on the issues of Indigenous peoples and women rights in Nepal and India Supporting the NES project in Indonesia Land and Human rights defenders
ILC Asia to share the approved work plan and vice versa to see the possible collaboration
Oxfam GB Asia, Bangkok, Thailand
3 Implementation of UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights through the National Action Plans (NAP) Supporting commitment-based multi-country initiatives ASEAN Economic Integration VGGT and Food Issue
ILC Asia and Oxfam GB, GRAISEA Programme develop joint proposal on the implementation of UNGP on BHR (focused countries: Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, and Myanmar) ILC Asia to provide commitment-based proposals from members to Oxfam GB Asia for further possible supporting
43
07
ASIA
ILC Asia Regional Co-ordination Unit
c/o Konsorsium Pembaruan
Agraria (KPA)
Jl Pancoran Indah 1 Blok
E3 No.1 Pancoran, Jakarta
Selatan 12760 Indonesia
Phone: +62 21 79 84 540
Fax: +62 21 79 93 834
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: http://www.landcoalition.org/en/regions/asia