annual report - hantam municipalityhantam.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/annual-rep… · web...
TRANSCRIPT
[Type here]
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 – MAYOR’S FOREWORD AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................6COMPONENT A: MAYOR’S FOREWORD.....................................................................6COMPONENT B: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................7
1.1. MUNICIPAL MANAGER’S OVERVIEW.........................................................................................7
1.2. MUNICIPAL FUNCTIONS, POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW............................9
1.3. SERVICE DELIVERY OVERVIEW.................................................................................................21
1.4. FINANCIAL HEALTH OVERVIEW...............................................................................................23
1.5. ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW...........................Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.6. AUDITOR GENERAL REPORT........................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.7. STATUTORY ANNUAL REPORT PROCESS.....................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
CHAPTER 2 – GOVERNANCE.........................................................................................................................33
COMPONENT A: POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE.........................................................33
2.1 POLITICAL GOVERNANCE.......................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
2.2 ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE.............................................................................................38
COMPONENT B: INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS...............................................................................39
2.3 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS............................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
COMPONENT C: PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY AND PARTICIPATION............................................................40
2.4 PUBLIC MEETINGS.......................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
2.5 IDP PARTICIPATION AND ALIGNMENT....................................................................................43
COMPONENT D: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...........................................................................................43
2.6 RISK MANAGEMENT................................................................................................................44
2.7 ANTI-CORRUPTION AND FRAUD.............................................................................................45
2.8 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT...............................................................................................45
2.9 BY-LAWS..................................................................................................................................46
2.10 WEBSITES................................................................................................................................47
2.11 PUBLIC SATISFACTION ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES.......................Error! Bookmark not defined.
CHAPTER 3 – SERVICE DELIVERY PERFORMANCE (PERFORMANCE REPORT PART I)...................................51
COMPONENT A: BASIC SERVICES.............................................................................................................52
3.1. WATER PROVISION..................................................................................................................53
3.2 WASTE WATER (SANITATION) PROVISION..............................................................................57
3.3 ELECTRICITY.............................................................................................................................64
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 2
[Type here]
3.4 WASTE MANAGEMENT (THIS SECTION TO INCLUDE: REFUSE COLLECTIONS, WASTE DISPOSAL, STREET CLEANING AND RECYCLING)..................................................................................................................................70
3.5 HOUSING.................................................................................................................................77
3.6 FREE BASIC SERVICES AND INDIGENT SUPPORT.....................................................................81
COMPONENT B: ROAD TRANSPORT.........................................................................................................84
3.7 ROADS.....................................................................................................................................84
3.8 TRANSPORT (INCLUDING VEHICLE LICENSING & PUBLIC BUS OPERATION)............................89
3.9 WASTE WATER (STORMWATER DRAINAGE)...........................................................................93
COMPONENT C: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT....................................................................................98
3.10 PLANNING...............................................................................................................................99
3.11 LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING TOURISM AND MARKET PLACES)..............103
COMPONENT D: COMMUNITY & SOCIAL SERVICES...............................................................................108
3.52 LIBRARIES; ARCHIEVES; MUSEUMS; GALLERIES; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; OTHER (THEATRES, ZOOS, ETC) 109
3.55 CEMETORIES AND CREMATORIUMS.....................................................................................112
3.56 CHILD CARE; AGED CARE; SOCIAL PROGRAMMES................................................................116
COMPONENT E: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION..................................................................................120
3.59 POLLUTION CONTROL...........................................................................................................120
3.60 BIO-DIVERSITY; LANDSCAPE (INCL. OPEN SPACES); AND OTHER (EG. COASTAL PROTECTION)124
COMPONENT F: HEALTH........................................................................................................................128
3.62 CLINICS..................................................................................................................................129
3.63 AMBULANCE SERVICES..........................................................................................................133
3.64 HEALTH INSPECTION; FOOD AND ABBATOIR LICENSING AND INSPECTION; ETC.................137
COMPONENT G: SECURITY AND SAFETY................................................................................................141
3.65 POLICE...................................................................................................................................141
3.66 FIRE........................................................................................................................................145
3.67 OTHER (DISASTER MANAGEMENT, ANIMAL LICENCING AND CONTROL, CONTROL OF PUBLIC NUISANCES AND OTHER) 149
COMPONENT H: SPORT AND RECREATION............................................................................................154
3.68 SPORT AND RECREATION......................................................................................................154
COMPONENT I: CORPORATE POLICY OFFICES AND OTHER SERVICES....................................................157
3.69 EXECUTIVE AND COUNCIL.....................................................................................................157
3.70 FINANCIAL SERVICES.............................................................................................................161
3.71 HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES...............................................................................................165
3.72 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) SERVICES................................169
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 3
[Type here]
3.73 PROPERTY; LEGAL; RISK MANAGEMENT AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES.............................173
COMPONENT J: MISCELLANEOUS..........................................................................................................177
CHAPTER 4 – ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE.............................................................179
(PERFORMANCE REPORT PART II)..............................................................................................................179
COMPONENT A: INTRODUCTION TO THE MUNICIPAL PERSONNEL.......................................................179
4.1 EMPLOYEE TOTALS, TURNOVER AND VACANCIES................................................................179
COMPONENT B: MANAGING THE MUNICIPAL WORKFORCE.................................................................181
4.2 POLICIES................................................................................................................................182
4.3 INJURIES, SICKNESS AND SUSPENSIONS................................................................................182
4.4 PERFORMANCE REWARDS....................................................................................................187
COMPONENT C: CAPACITATING THE MUNICIPAL WORKFORCE............................................................188
4.5 SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING..................................................................................189
COMPONENT D: MANAGING THE WORKFORCE EXPENDITURE.............................................................191
4.6 EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE......................................................................................................192
CHAPTER 5 – FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE..................................................................................................196
COMPONENT A: STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE..............................................................196
5.1 STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE........................................................................197
5.2 GRANTS.................................................................................................................................200
5.3 ASSET MANAGEMENT...........................................................................................................202
5.4 FINANCIAL RATIOS BASED ON KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.........................................205
COMPONENT B: SPENDING AGAINST CAPITAL BUDGET........................................................................210
5.5 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE..........................................................................................................210
5.6 SOURCES OF FINANCE...........................................................................................................211
5.7 CAPITAL SPENDING ON 5 LARGEST PROJECTS......................................................................213
5.8 BASIC SERVICE AND INFRASTRUCTURE BACKLOGS – OVERVIEW.........................................214
COMPONENT C: CASH FLOW MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENTS........................................................216
5.9 CASH FLOW...........................................................................................................................218
5.10 BORROWING AND INVESTMENTS.........................................................................................219
5.11 PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS...........................................................................................223
COMPONENT D: OTHER FINANCIAL MATTERS.......................................................................................224
5.12 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT.............................................................................................224
5.13 GRAP COMPLIANCE...............................................................................................................225
CHAPTER 6 – AUDITOR GENERAL AUDIT FINDINGS...................................................................................226
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 4
[Type here]
COMPONENT A: AUDITOR-GENERAL OPINION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2007/08..........................227
6.1 AUDITOR GENERAL REPORTS 2007/08.........................................................................................227
COMPONENT B: AUDITOR-GENERAL OPINION 2008/09........................................................................227
6.2 AUDITOR GENERAL REPORT 2008/09...........................................................................................227
GLOSSARY..................................................................................................................................................230
APPENDICES...............................................................................................................................................235
APPENDIX A – COUNCILLORS; COMMITTE ALLOCATION AND COUNCIL ATTENDANCE.........................235
APPENDIX B – COMMITTEES AND COMMITTEE PURPOSES...................................................................236
APPENDIX C –THIRD TIER ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE......................................................................237
APPENDIX D – FUNCTIONS OF MUNICIPALITY / ENTITY.........................................................................238
APPENDIX E – WARD REPORTING..........................................................................................................239
APPENDIX F – WARD INFORMATION.....................................................................................................241
APPENDIX G – RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL AUDIT COMMITTEE 2008/09......................242
APPENDIX H – LONG TERM CONTRACTS AND PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS....................................242
APPENDIX I – MUNICIPAL ENTITY/ SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE..............................244
APPENDIX J – DISCLOSURES OF FINANCIAL INTERESTS..........................................................................245
APPENDIX K: REVENUE COLLECTION PERFORMANCE BY VOTE AND BY SOURCE.................................245
APPENDIX K(i): REVENUE COLLECTION PERFORMANCE BY VOTE..........................................................246
APPENDIX K(ii): REVENUE COLLECTION PERFORMANCE BY SOURCE.....................................................246
APPENDIX L: CONDITIONAL GRANTS RECEIVED: EXCLUDING MIG........................................................247
APPENDIX M: CAPITAL EXPENDITURE – NEW & UPGRADE/RENEWAL PROGRAMMES........................249
APPENDIX M(i): CAPITAL EXPENDITURE - NEW ASSETS PROGRAMME..................................................249
APPENDIX M(ii): CAPITAL EXPENDITURE – UPGRADE/RENEWAL PROGRAMME...................................250
APPENDIX N – CAPITAL PROGRAMME BY PROJECT 2008/09.................................................................253
APPENDIX O – CAPITAL PROGRAMME BY PROJECT BY WARD 2008/09................................................254
APPENDIX P – SERVICE CONNECTION BACKLOGS AT SCHOOLS AND CLINICS........................................254
APPENDIX Q – SERVICE BACKLOGS EXPERIENCED BY THE COMMUNITY WHERE ANOTHER SPHERE OF GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SERVICE PROVISION.................................................................................................256
APPENDIX R – DECLARATION OF LOANS AND GRANTS MADE BY THE MUNICIPALITY..........................257
APPENDIX S – DECLARATION OF RETURNS NOT MADE IN DUE TIME UNDER MFMA S71.....................258
VOLUME II: ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS......................................................................................260
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 5
CHAPTER 1 – MAYOR’S FOREWORD AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMPONENT A: MAYOR’S FOREWORD41
MAYOR’S FOREWORD
STILL TO BE COMPLETED
a. Vision(A succinct narrative on the direction of travel, key strategic objectives and the major changes that are being addressed). This is the most important single statement in the Annual Report.b. Key Policy Developments
(This is based on Strategic alignment to the Provincial Growth and Development Strategy, and the IDP strategies included in the IDP especially with focus on impact and outcome achieved – bearing in mind that foreword provides details that should be included in the chapters to follow.c.Key Service Delivery Improvements(Comment on the major successes of the year included and provide an indication of challenges overcome.)d. Public Participation
(Methods and/or processes used to increase public awareness on service availability engage public in decision making and improve accountability to communities.)e.Future Actions
(Initiatives committed whereby service delivery will be improved over the next few years.)f. Agreements / Partnerships (announcements on special partnerships
initiated)g. Conclusion
Final thoughts on the year.
CHAPTER 1
(Signed by :) ___________________________Mayor/Executive MayorDelete Directive note once comment is complete – The Mayor may wish to make brief mention of initiatives attempted that were not entirely successful in the interests of accountability and forming a closer, trusting relationship with the community T 1.0.1
COMPONENT B: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL MANAGER’S OVERVIEW
MUNICIPAL MANAGER’S OVERVIEW
STILL TO BE COMPLETED
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Municipal Manager to provide brief comments on improvements made to service delivery and ‘mechanisms’ or initiatives’ initiated during the year to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness of municipal activities. Provide specific references with regard to: (i) the alignment of services to IDP indicators and Council priorities; (ii) service delivery performance; (iii) financial sustainability as represented by the financial health ratios; (iv) the efforts the municipality is making to conserve power and water in its offices and other facilities to compliment the conservation measures its residents are being requested to adopt in their own housekeeping; and (v) provide details of administrative policies made during the year reflecting the pressures from the world recession that impact on everyone (e.g. restrictions on conferences and other events outside your municipality and the use of meeting accommodation other than your municipality’s own venues). See also Compiler’s Guide.
Please describe any shared service arrangements (e.g. sharing ICT; payroll, billing, revenue collection; or internal audit) your municipality has entered into with other municipalities (or other organisations). Give the
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 7
CHAPTER 1reasons and the effects. T 1.1.1
MUNICIPAL FUNCTIONS, POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEWINTRODUCTION TO BACKGROUND DATA
The Hantam Municipality covers approximately 30 000 square kilometres and includes Calvinia, the centre, as well as Brandvlei, Loeriesfontein, Middelpos and Nieuwoudtville. The Hantam local municipality is one of six local municipality’s that forms part of the Namakwa District Municipality.
Calvinia is approximately 400 km from Cape Town, Springbok, Upington and Beaufort West. A 1 250 meter tarred runway, very close to Calvinia, is used by many visitors to this beautiful part of the Northern Cape.
Seventy percent of the population of approximately 20 000 people live and work in the towns.
Farming is the main contributor to the economy, namely sheep, wool, lucerne as well as rooibos tea. Numerous government departments are also situated in Calvinia.
The Hantam is well known for its wide open spaces, stunning mountain ranges and nature reserves filled with an incredible array of plants and bulbs that cannot be found anywhere else in the world.
The growth rate is at 0.59%.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 8
CHAPTER 1The municipality delivers basic services to the communities of Calvinia, Brandvlei, Loeriesfontein, Nieuwoudtville, Middelpos and Swartkop.
CalviniaCalvinia is named after the French religious reformer Jean Calvin. The town is just south of the Hantam mountains on the banks of the Oorlogskloof (meaning "War Ravine") River.Calvinia enjoys 80% starlight and is renowned for its kaleidoscope of spring wildflowers coinciding with the Namaqualand wildflower spectacle.The name Hantam is derived from the Khoisan word !Han=ami, which refers to a plant with edible roots (Pelargonium bifolium, in Afrikaans "uintjies"). !Han=ami means "where the red bulbs grow".The first reverend, N.J. Hofmeyr, proposed that the church be named after John Calvin. On 30 Oktober 1851 the town was officially named Calvinia. It became a municipality in 1904.
The Calvinia Museum is housed in the former art deco styled Jewish synagogue built in 1920. The museum portrays the lives of the early European settlers. It displays a cedarwood horsemill and mounted Cape fat-tailed, Merino and Dorper sheep. Unusual specimens such as a 4-legged ostriche and genetically strange sheep can also be viewed.The Akkerendam Nature Reserve is located three kilometers north of Calvinia. The reserve offers unique flowers and two hiking trails cross the Hantam mountains. The indigenous and rare sterboom (literally translated "star tree") (Cliffortia arboreais) can be seen here.The Hantam Meat Festival, an agricultural show and great barbecue (Afrikaans "braai"), take place every year in late August.The Boekhuis (translated "Book House") was built in 1860 by Jacobus Nel van der Merwe in Cape Dutch style with a concave-convex gable. It is a historical T-shaped house in Water Street and is made available for the exclusive use of writers.
BrandvleiBrandvlei is a small town in the Karoo region of the Northern Cape. This is where a 19th-century trekboer called Ou Brand settled. Brand camped at this spot at the Sakrivier, a dry river bed, which only occasionally had water after good rains – and which typically result in flash floods.The settlement was cut in two by such a flood in 1961. After it was recovered, a municipality was formed in 1962.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 9
CHAPTER 1 Brandvlei is located in the Bushmanland, also known as the Thirst Land, Dorsland in Afrikaans. This area was once sub-tropical, such as during the Miocene period. Many fossils have that been found in the area back this fact for us. From 1910 the farmers used an irrigation method comparable to one used for thousands of years by the Egyptians. The surface is very flat, and water does not run away easily. This way the rainwater is spread over a larger area and are allowed to sink into the soil. The moisture in the area is enough to farm with crops on a very small scale. Farmers live on these crops once the rains have gone. On the long run this method is not feasible, as evaporating water leaves behind salt and other minerals. Today this method is no longer used.This region contains very little vegetation, primarily very low shrubs and yellow grass among a rocky desert kind of landscape.
Tourist Attractions Birdlife – The salt pans are renovated into bird sanctuaries after the
summer rains. Dutch Reformed Church – visit to the old Dutch Reformed Church in
Neo-Gothic style Lekkerlê en Kans – Two farms exhibiting splendid displays of San
rock engravings. Paragliding – In 1993 the record set for greatest gain in height was
set in Brandvlei (4526m). The Karoo area is very thermic and has claimed multiple paragliding world records over the years.
LoeriesfonteinThe town of Loeriesfontein is within a basin surrounded by mountains, and it is accessed from the N7 highway (north out of Cape Town), turning off on the R27 at Van Rhynsdorp to Nieuwoudtville, then following the R357 to Loeriesfontein (a further 65 km north).Loeriesfontein became a municipality in 1958, but it has since lost that status in a re-organization of municipal responsibilities that incorporated it into Hantam Municipality.The town grew around a general store established in 1894 by a travelling bible salesman, named Fredrick Turner, the son of the sister of Charles Spurgeon. He came from Norwich, England. The store still exists. It is currently owned by Victor Haupt, the grandson of Fredrick Turner. The shop is currently called Turner & Haupt SPAR, and is 113 years in the family.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 10
CHAPTER 1Southwestern Loeriesfontein forms part of the wider region known as Namaqualand, an area well known for its spring flowers (August and September) and its great variety of different plants - some 4,000 varieties are said to be evident in this region. The flowers attract visitors to the region, but at other times activities centre around agriculture (sheep) and mining (salt).
Tourist Attractions
Windmill museum – windpumps on display at the Fred Turner Museum.
Fred Turner folk and culture museum – Cultural and historical way of life of the “Trek Farmers” of Namaqualand.
Salt Pans – 100km from Loeriesfontein in the spacious plains of Bushmanland are salt pans (dwaggas) still in production.
Quiver trees – Large quiver trees reffered to as “Aloes” on the road from Nieuwoudtville to Loeriesfontein.
NieuwoudtvilleNieuwoudtville lies on the Bokkeveld Escarpment and was established in 1897. It is a unique International Biodiversity Hotspot and lies on the Bokkeveld Plateau, where the Cape fynbos meets the Hantam Karoo, Bushmanland and the Knersvlakte. It is a place where the experience of silence, space and stars contribute to a tranquil way of life.
Tourist Attractions Neo-Gothic Sandstone Church (National
Monument); Local Historical Sandstone Ruins; Quiver Tree Forest (Aloe Dichotoma); Glacial Pavement; abundant Rock Art; the local Bulb Nursery; Nieuwoudtville Wild Flower Reserve; Hantam National Botanical Garden; Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve and the Nieuwoudtville Waterfall
Reserve.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 11
CHAPTER 1 Outdoor activities can be enjoyed – including: caravanning; bird
watching; hiking; cycling; hang and paragliding; 4 x 4 routes and stargazing.
MiddelposThe small village of Middelpos lies in the southern parts of the Roggeveld. This privately owned village is a place where the experience of silence, space and stars contribute to a tranquil way of life.
You will find Middelpos half way between Sutherland and Calvinia on the R354. There is also a direct access road from Ceres.Apart from the school and police station, the town also has a hotel, shop, garage and post office, as well as more than 50 residences with a population of ±300 people.Outdoor activities that can be enjoyed, includes: bird watching; hiking; cycling; hang and para-gliding; 4x4 routes; star gazing, mountain climbing, donkey cart rides....
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 12
CHAPTER 1
Tourist AttractionsAkkerendam Nature ReserveThe reserve has three hiking trails across the Hantam Mountain, affording you the opportunity to take in magnificent scenery, study the sterboom as well as up to 65 species of birds.Dutch Reformed Church Designed by Potchefstroom architect, Gaysford, the church is in neo-gothic style and cost £1 200 to build.
Demographic information
According to Census 2011, Hantam Municipality has a total population of 21 578, of which 82,2% are coloured, 12,1% are white, 4,4% are black African and 0,7% consists of Indian/Asian. The remainder of the population (0,6%) is made up by other groups.Population
MunicipalityPopulation2001
Population2009
Population2011
Hantam 19 942 20 351 21 578
The population of Hantam Municipality is remaining stable with little or no growth. There is also a high percentage (%) of backyard housing dwellings and illegal land occupants within the municipal area due to the non-availability of formal housing or serviced sights.
Of those aged 20 years and older, 18,8% completed Grade 12, 19,7% have some primary education, 8,4% completed primary education, 30,6% completed some secondary education, 8,1% have some higher education and only 14,4% had no schooling.
Unemployment and poverty affects a large number of people within the municipal area. The unemployment rate for the youth is 15,3% according to the 2011 census. Of the 7085 economically active people in the municipality, 11,8 are unemployed.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 13
CHAPTER 1The economy of Hantam Municipality is dependent on the sheep farming agricultural sector, government services and the tourism industry. The sector showing significant growth is the tourism sector.
Sex and Age Distribution
AGE GROUPS % MALES % FEMALES0-4 4.8 4.25-9 4.7 4.310-14 4.8 4.515-19 4.6 4.220-24 3.9 3.725-29 3.7 3.530-34 2.9 2.835-39 3.2 3.340-44 3.4 3.545-49 3.3 3.350-54 2.9 3.155-59 2.4 2.560-64 1.9 265-69 1.4 1.670-74 1 1.275-79 0.6 0.880-84 0.3 0.685+ 0.2 0.5
Total Female = 49.9%Male = 50.1%
Level of EducationOf those aged 20 years and older, 18.8% completed Grade 12, 19.7% have some primary education, 8.4% completed primary education, 30.6 completed some secondary education, 8.1% have some higher education and only 14.4 had no schooling.Settlement type
AREA %Urban 79.9%Farm 20.1%
Socio-Economic StatusThe socio-economic problems experienced in Hantam Municipality are related to the lack of adequate housing and the high unemployment rate
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 14
CHAPTER 1in the municipal area. The Municipality has been working closely with the Social Development Department to deal with problems emanating from poverty and the lack of housing.
Households
The total number of households are set out in the table below – 2013/14AREA HOUSEHOLDS INDIGENTS
Calvinia 3 515 330Brandvlei 1 378 179Loeriesfontein 1 665 438Nieuwoudtville 1 284 118Middelpos 54 15Swartkop 200 35Farms 2 200 0Total 10 296 1 115
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 15
CHAPTER 1
Service Delivery OverviewBasic ServicesThe Hantam Local Municipality delivers the following basic services to its community:-
Water Sanitation Electricity Refuse removal
BASIC SERVICES ACTUAL PERFORMANCEWaterSanitationElectricityRefuse RemovalRoads
100%100%
100% for all towns except Middelpos100% once per week1000m2 road paved
The Municipality experienced an extreme water crisis in Loeriesfontein where water in boreholes dried up. Water had to be transported daily by truck to the town. This had a tremendous financial impact on the municipality.
Housing backlog as proportion of current demand
Unemployment Rate
Proportion of households with no income
Proportion of population in low-skilled employment
HIV/AIDSprevalence
Illiterate people older than 14 years
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 16
CHAPTER 1
COMMENT ON BACKGROUND DATA: Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 17
Settlement Type Households PopulationTowns
Sub-TotalTownships
Sub-TotalRural settlements
Sub-TotalInformal settlements
Sub-TotalTotal
Overview of Neighbourhoods within 'Name of Municipality'
T1.2.6
Major Natural Resource Relevance to Community
T1.2.7
Natural Resources
CHAPTER 1
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Set out Key challenges and opportunities for the municipality arising from the data provided in this demographic section. Discuss the relevance of the 5 Major resources and the ways in which your municipality is trying to improve the positive impact they have on the local community
T1.2.8
1.1. SERVICE DELIVERY OVERVIEW
SERVICE DELIVERY INTRODUCTION
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Provide a brief introduction to basic service delivery achievements and challenges including a brief specific comment on service delivery to indigents.
T 1.3.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 18
CHAPTER 1
T1.3.2
COMMENT ON ACCESS TO BASIC SERVICES:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Explain the shortfalls in service contained in the diagram above
T1.3.3
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 19
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Proportion of households with access to basic services
Electricity service connections
Water - available within 200 m from dwelling
Sanitation - Households with at leats VIP service
Waste collection - kerbside collection once a week
R' 000Details Original budget Adjustment Budget Actual
IncomeGrants 23692 24048 49160Taxes, Levies and tariffs 37663 37771 41083Other 1068 745 8690Sub Total 62423 62564 98933
Less Expenditure 67051 67024 90045Net Total* -4628 -4460 8888* Note: surplus/(deficit)
Financial Overview - 2013/14
CHAPTER 1
1.2. FINANCIAL HEALTH OVERVIEW
During the 2013/2014 financial year, Hantam Local Municipality incurred some challenges. An ongoing theme is Debt Collection in the Municipality. The outstanding debtor days are an indication that the municipality is not recouping their service fees quickly enough. This puts strain on the financial resources of the municipality. Another unfortunate position the municipality finds itself in, is the fact that Loeriesfontein has a water crisis. To ensure continuous service delivery of water by the municipality, a huge monthly operational cost is incurred. This was not budgeted for. Another material effect is the fact that the National Equitable Share formulae has changed. This means that the municipality will receive almost the same amount for 3 years from the National Government. This has a material negative effect on the municipality.
The norm for Employee Cost is 30% to total operating cost, currently the municipality stands on 28%. This is a positive indication in the sense that
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 20
Detail %Employee Cost 28%Repairs & Maintenance 4%Finance Charges & Depreciation 9%
T1.4.3
Operating Ratios
R'000Detail Year -1 Year 0 Year 1
Original Budget 15000 23544Adjustment Budget 33000 28138Actual 13000 25188
Total Capital Expenditure: Year -2013/14
T1.4.4
CHAPTER 1
there is no overspending on staff cost and that the municipality has a efficient work force. The norm for Repairs and maintenance is 20%. The municipality stands on 4%. Unfortunately this is a negative indication as the municipality needs assets that are up to standard to have effective and efficient service delivery. The norm for Finance Charges and Depreciation is 10%. The municipality has a percentage of 9%. This is lower than normal which is a positive indication.
T1.4.3.
T1.4.5
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 21
CHAPTER 1
1.3. AUDITOR GENERAL REPORT
AUDITOR GENERAL REPORT 2012/2013The municipality received a qualified opinion. In the previous year a qualified opinion was also received. The qualification was on one material misstatement found by the auditors. There has been an improvement from the previous year when the qualification was made on more than one material misstatement:
The following emphasis of matters were highlighted in the report:
The corresponding figures for 30 June 2012 have been restated as a result of errors discovered during 30 June 2013 in the financial statements of the Hantam Local Municipality at, and for the year ended, 30 June 2012.
A significant provision for the impairment of receivables from exchange transactions and non-exchange transactions was created which constitutes 50% and 44% of the total receivables from exchange transactions and non-exchange transactions balance respectively.
Material losses to the amount of R1 491 706 and R3 675 300 were incurred as a result of the distribution of water and electricity respectively.
Irregular expenditure of R7 768 634 as disclosed in the financial statements.
During the 2012/2013 121 Audit Findings were noted on the Management Report. An Audit Action Plan was put in place during the 2013/2014 financial year. Most findings were addressed during the year.
1.4. STATUTORY ANNUAL REPORT PROCESS
No.
Activity Timeframe
1 Assess the 2013/14 IDP & Budget process to
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 22
CHAPTER 1June 2014 address deficiencies, improvements and ensure
integration and alignment of processes for2014/15 - 2016/17
2
July 2014
Attend District IDP Managers Forum Meeting discuss outcomes of IDP and Budget Assessments, challenges and District Interventions i.t.o. IDPand budget planning for the review process
3 Signing of 2014/15 performance contracts for section 56 Managers
4 Prepare and finalise Departmental Plans
5 Final Section 56 Managers 2013/14 performance assessments.
6
August 2014
Draft 2015/16 IDP and Budget process time schedule outlining the steps and timeframes for compilation of the 2015/16 IDP, Budget and two outer year's Budget and SDBIP.
7Consult Sector Departments to establish programme/projects for 5 years - Inter- Governmental engagements on IDP and Budget
8Tabling of and briefing Council in Draft 2015/16 IDP/Budget Process Plan for approval, including time schedule for IDP/Budget Public participation meetings
9
September 2014
Advertise the budget process and dates of IDP/Budget Public meetings on municipal website, local newspaper.
10
Attend District IDP Managers Forum Meeting.Develop uniform guidelines for IDP/Budget review
11 Ward Committee meetings - Quarter One
12
October 2014
Submit Quarterly (July - September) on implementation of budget and financial state of affairs to Council
13
Submit MFMA Implementation plan to National and Provincial Treasury
14
Submit bulk resource documentation, electricity to NERSA for consultation on municipal tariffs for 2015/16 and two outer years (D-forms)
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 23
CHAPTER 1
15
November 2014
Based on financial statements of 2014/15 determine municipality's financial position & assess its financial capacity & available funding for the next three years
16
Review Municipal Strategies, objectives, KPA's, KPI's and targets - Indentification of priority IDP KPI's incorporate in IDP and link to budget.
17
Management articulates outcomes, objectives, priorities and outputs desired for next three years and submit capital budget project proposal for draft IDP Review document to Budget Office
18
December 2014
Finalise preliminary projections on operating and expenditure budget for 2014/15
19
Conclusion of Sector Plans and integration into the IDP Document
20 Ward Committee meetings - Quarter Two
21
January 2015
Management finalise draft IDP & Capital Budget for referral to IDP & Budget Steering Committees.
22 Tabling of 2014/2015 Mid-Year Assessment
23
Submit Quarterly report (Oct 2014 - Dec 2014) on implementation of budget and financial state of affairs to Council. (Combining with Sec.72 Report)
24
Tabling of 2014/2015 Revised Budget and submitting to National and Provincial Treasury
25
Tabling of Draft Annual Report of 2013/14 year to Council and submit to National Treasury and Coghsta
26
Reviewing of municipal strategies, KPA's, KPI's and targets (SDBIP)
27
Publication of Revised Budget on municipal website
28
February 2015
Municipal receive inputs from National and Provincial Government on factors influencing the budget, e.g. Grant Allocations
29
Attend District IDP Managers Forum meeting to discuss the alignment of IDP Strategic
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 24
CHAPTER 1development goals with the District Municipality Draft IDP presentations
30
March 2015
Present Draft IDP and Budget to Steering Committee for quality check
31
Workshop draft IDP and Budget and proposed tariffs and SDBIP with Council
32
Tabling of Draft IDP and Budget and proposed tariffs and SDBIP in Council for approval
33
Ward Committee meetings - Quarter Three. Discuss draft IDP and Budget
34
Council adopt oversight report of the Annual Report of the 2014/2015 Year
35
April 2015
Advertise and inviting public comments on Draft Budget, proposed Tariffs and IDP. Place copies of the Draft Budget and IDP at all municipal offices
36
Forward copies of preliminary approved Budget, IDP, SDBIP and related documents to National and Provincial Treasury within 10 working days after tabling
37 Public consultation meetings with communities
38
Engagement with Provincial Treasury on draft budget benchmark
39
CFO and Corporate Services analyse public and ward committee comments and inputs on draft IDP and Budget and prepare recommendations for Council's perusal.
40
Council considers public and Government Dept comments and inputs and revised IDP, Budget and SDBIP if necessary
41
May 2015
Present final IDP, Budget and SDBIP for quality check (Including allrecommendations made by stakeholders)
42
Table final IDP, Budget and SDBIP and related documents to Council for approval.
43
Inform local community on approved IDP and Budget detail by publishing in the local newspaper
4 Send copies of approved Budget, IDP and related Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 25
CHAPTER 1
4
June 2015
documents to National and Provincial Treasury and other stakeholders. Ensure signing the quality certificate. (within 10 working days)
45
Publication of approved IDP and Budget on the municipality's website
46
Submit draft SDBIP to Mayor within 14 days after approval of budget
47
Mayor approves the municipality's SDBIP within 28 days after the approval of the budget and submit hard and electronic copies to National Treasury
48
Municipal Manager to sign certificate that the approved budget is captured correctly in the financial system of the municipality
T1.7.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 26
CHAPTER 1
COMMENT ON THE ANNUAL REPORT PROCESS:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete –Explain the importance of achieving the above deadlines to prepare the Annual Report nearer the end of the financial year and to provide the next budget process with a wide range of data from the outset. Include a statement to explain the importance of alignment between the IDP, Budget and Performance Management System as dealt with at item 1 or the schedule. Explain any failures to achieve the above timescales.
T1.7.1.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 27
CHAPTER 2 – GOVERNANCE
INTRODUCTION TO GOVERNANCEThe characteristics of Good Governance is participatory, consensus oriented, accountable, transparent, responsive, effective and efficient, equitable and inclusive. It complies with the rule of law. It assures that corruption is minimized, the views of minorities are taken into account and that the voices of the most vulnerable in society are heard in decision-making. Good Governance is also responsive to the present and future needs of the society the municipality is served.
COMPONENT A: POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE
INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCESection 151(3) of the Constitution states that the council of a municipality has the right to govern, on its own initiative, the local government affairs of the local community. Council as political governance, performs both legislative and executive functions. Council focuses on decision-making to formulate policy and to play an oversight and participatory role.The legislative function of the Council is vested within the full council with the Mayor/Speaker as its Chairperson. Council also established Section 80 committees within specific functional areas of the municipality.The Audit/Performance Audit committee is an independent advisory body that advises the municipal council, political office-bearers, Accounting Officer and Management Staff of the municipality on financial control, risk management, accounting policies, performance management and effective governance. The Municipal Public Account Committee (MPAC) fulfils the duty of an Oversight Committee, and comprises non-executive councilors, with the specific purpose of providing council with comments and recommendations on the Annual Report. The Oversight Committee’s report is published separately in accordance with MFMA guidelines. The MPAC Committee also investigate fruitless, wasteful and unauthorized expenditure and make recommendations to council.
POLITICAL STRUCTURES
Hantam Municipal Council is constituted of 9 councilors (ward & PR). The DA/Cope coalition has five (5) councilors and the ANC four (4) councilors. Hantam Municipality has a plenary council.
CHAIRPERSON
The structuring of the council is set out in the table below:WARD COUNCILLOR PARTY WARD/PR MALE/
FEMALEA. Fritz DA PR - MAYOR Male
Ward 1 M. Esau ANC Ward councilor
Female
Ward 2 R. Swartz ANC Ward councilor
Male
Ward 3 F. Sterkse ANC Ward councilor
Male
Ward 4 J. Wilschut ANC Ward councilor
Female
Ward 5 G. Opperman DA Ward councilor
Female
G. Engelbrecht DA PR councilor Male H. Steenkamp DA PR councilor Female J. Swarts COPE PR councilor Male
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 29
MAYOR
COUNCILORS
SECTION
79/80 COM
MITTEES
COUNCIL COMMITTEES
COMMITTEES COUNCILLORS
FINANCIAL COMMITTEEA.F. Fritz (Chairperson)F. J. SterkseG.J. Engelbrecht
INSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEEG.J. Engelbrecht (Chairperson)J.H. WilschutA.F. Fritz
INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEEJ. Swarts (Chairperson)R.N. SwarzH.C. Steenkamp
SOCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEEG. Opperman (Chairperson)M.S. EsauJ. Swarts
LOCAL LABOUR FORUMJ. Swarts (Chairperson)G. OppermanF.J. SterkseG.J. Engelbrecht
POLITICAL DECISION- TAKINGPolitical decisions are taken in formal meetings:-
General Council Meetings; Special Council Meetings; Special Council-in Committee Meetings.
Decisions taken in special council-in committee meetings are being approved/not approved in a general/special council meeting. All participating political parties in council have equal opportunity to deliberate the items as per agenda, where after a resolution is adapted.
The following table below indicates the resolutions taken for the 2013/14 financial period:-
Total Total number of Total number of resolutions Reasons for
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 30
number of resolutions
resolutions implemented
not implemented
resolutions not implemented.
COUNCIL MEETINGS
TYPE OF MEETING NR. OF MEETINGS DATES OF MEETINGS
Council General Meetings
5 meetings
27/07/201329/08/201328/11/201327/03/201430/06/2014
Council Special Meetings
5 meetings
02/10/201330/10/201328/01/201429/05/201424/06/2014
Special Council In- Committee
1 meeting 19/08/2014
Committee Meetings 2 meetings
2.2 ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCEINTRODUCTION TO ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCEThe Administration is headed by the Municipal Manager as the Accounting Officer. The Municipal Manager is responsible and accountable for the formation and development of an economical, effective, efficient and accountable administration as well as the management of the provision of services in a sustainable and equitable manner within the municipality. Administrative Structure 2013/14 d
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 31
OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER
DEPARTMENT: FINANCES. Coetzee
DEPARTMENTS
Total % of Resolutions Implemented
COMPONENT B: INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONSThe Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act (IGRFA) was passed in 2005. The Act provides a framework for the cooperation among the three spheres of government as distinctive, interdependent and interrelated, and it defines the responsibilities and institutional structures to support closer cooperation.The Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) Unit in the Department of Local Government and Housing came about as a result of the introduction of legislation initiated and monitored by the Department of Provincial and Local Government. The aim of the Unit is to encourage and enforce cooperative governance amongst the three spheres of government, National, Provincial and Local Government (Municipalities).For Hantam Municipality to succeed in its developmental role, proactive cooperation between all spheres of government is critical for efficient and effective service delivery. Each sphere of government has a role in the development planning, prioritization and resource allocation.Hantam Municipality has been taking full part in all Intergovernmental Relations meetings at both District and Provincial Level. The municipality interacts and participate in all IGR forums, compromising all government departments. Other engagements also took place through the year, both
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 32
DEPARTMENT:SOCIAL SERVICES
R. van Wyk
DEPARTMENT:TECHNICAL SERVICES
(Vacant)
DEPARTMENT:CORPORATE SERVICES
C. van Niekerk
FUNCTIONS
IncomeExpenditureBudget & TreasurySCMIT Services
ResortsEnvironmental ManagementCleaning ServicesMunicipal Health & SafetyTrafficFire & Disaster ManagementWaste Removal
RoadsWaterSanitationElectrical
Human ResourceCouncil SecretarialAdministrative functionsTown PlanningLand useBuilding ControlHousingRecord ManagementClient Services
on an ad hoc or project based approach by different line departments. The municipality also actively participate in forums set up by SALGA during the period under review.The following councilors represents, interacts and participate in different committees or forums:-
Cape Retirement Fund – G.J. Engelbrecht. IDP Forum – G. Opperman. Skills Development and Employment Equity – G. Opperman. Police Forum – M. Esau. Esta Committee – F. Sterkse. Museum Representative – G. Engelbrecht. Commonage Committee – J. Swartz. IGR Provincial and District - A. Fritz HIV/Aids Council – M. Esau. Health Committee – R. Swartz.
SALGA REPRESENTATION Economic Development – A. Fritz. Municipal Finance and Administration – G. Engelbrecht. Social Development: Health and Safety – H. Steenkamp. Municipal Services – J. Swarts. Management and IGR – A. Fritz-
COMPONENT C: PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY AND PARTICIPATION
OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY AND PARTICIPATION
In terms of Section 15(b) of the Municipal Systems Act, a municipality is required to establish and organise its administration to facilitate a culture of accountability amongst its staff. Section 16(1) states that a municipality must develop a system of municipal governance that complements formal representative governance with a system of participatory governance. Section 18(1)(d) requires a municipality to supply its community with information concerning municipal governance, management and development.Accountability and Community Participation were enhance by engagements through the following media:-
Messages on municipal accounts. Community radio: Radio Kaboesna.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 33
Local Newspaper: Die Noordwester. Pamphlets at houses. Posters on strategic places in towns. Loud Hailing.
Public MeetingsCommunity meeting: IDP/BudgetNature & Purpose
of meeting
Number of
meetings
Towns/Wards Dates of meeting
s
Nr. ofCouncill
orsAttende
d
Nr. ofMunicipal
Administrators
Attended
Nr. ofCommun
ityMember
s
IDP/Budget Meeting
1LoeriesfonteinNieuwoudtvilleCalviniaBrandvlei
15/04/201316/04/201317/04/201318/04/2013
2321
2322
22101415
Ward Committee meetingsWard Town Nr. of
meetings
Dates of meetings
Nr. ofCouncill
orsAttende
d
Nr. ofMunicipal
Administrators
Attended
Nr. ofCommun
ityMember
s
3Brandvlei 6 29/07/13
29/10/1309/12/1318/02/1427/05/1423/06/14
111111
000000
876778
5 Loeriesfontein
2 27/08/1322/10/13
11
10
1211
1;2;4 Calvinia; Nieuwoudtvill
e0
Wards 1,2 and 4 not functional and a new ward committee will be established in September 2014.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 34
2.5 IDP PARTICIPATION AND ALIGNMENTThe Municipal Systems Act (No. 32) of 2000 requires that local government structures prepare Integrated Development Plans (IDP’s). The IDP serves as a tool for the facilitation and management of development within the municipal area. The function for the preparation of the IDP is under the Office of the Municipal Manager and the authority for the preparation of the IDP is delegated to an official. In terms of the alignment of the IDP, there is still challenges that will be addressed in the new financial year.
IDP Participation and Alignment Criteria Yes/No
Does the municipality have impact, outcome, input, output indicators?
Yes
Does the IDP have priorities, objectives, KPIs, development strategies?
Yes
Does the IDP have multi-year targets? NoAre the above aligned and can they calculate into a score? YesDoes the budget align directly to the KPIs in the strategic plan? YesDo the IDP KPIs align to the Section 57 Managers NoDo the IDP KPIs lead to functional area KPIs as per the SDBIP? YesDo the IDP KPIs align with the provincial KPIs on the 12 Outcomes
No
Were the indicators communicated to the public? YesWere the four quarter aligned reports submitted within stipulated time frames?
COMPONENT D: CORPORATE GOVERNANCEOVERVIEW OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance is the system by which municipalities direct and control their functions and relate to the communities.2.6 RISK MANAGEMENT
In terms of Section 62(1)(c) of the MFMA, the accounting officer of the municipality must take reasonable steps to ensure that the municipality has and maintains effective, efficient and transparent systems of financial and risk management and internal control.
The Hantam Municipality does not have a Risk Management Unit or a designated official/Risk Officer. However all risk related functions are being
done by the Finance Department and the Internal Audit Committee. A Risk Management Policy was developed and approved in June 2014. The Risk Register are in place and are being monitored and updated on a regular basis. Risks from findings of the external audit report are being addressed through the OPCAR Action Plan. Management is responsible for the establishment and maintenance of an effective system of internal control, risk management and governance processes.Management’s responsibility is the establishment and maintenance of an effective system of governance to:
Promote appropriate ethics and values within the municipality. Ensure effective organizational performance management and
accountability. Effectively coordinate the activities of and communicate information
among the council, management and external and internal auditors.
2.7 ANTI-CORRUPTION AND FRAUDInternal Audit work is planned with a reasonable expectation of detecting significant control weaknesses in the specific areas reviewed. However, internal audit procedures alone, even when carried out with due professional care, do not guarantee that fraud will be detected. Accordingly, our reviews and investigations as internal auditors should not be relied upon solely to disclose fraud, defalcation or other irregularities that may exist.Key risk areas identified and recommendations made by the Internal Audit, the Audit/Performance Audit Committee, the Auditor General Report and the MPAC Committee are being addressed by follow-up audits and by an Action Plan.
*Refer to attached reports of Internal Audit; Audit/Performance Committee and the Auditor General Report.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 36
2.8 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Section 110-119 of the Supply Chain Management Regulations 2005 and relevant MFMA Circulars, set out the required processes and guidance to help ensure that SCM arrangements provide appropriate goods and services, offer best value for money and minimize opportunities for fraud and corruption.Reports on the implementation of the Supply Chain Management Policy are submitted monthly to the Accounting Officer. These reports are also tabled in special council meetings.The Procurement Processes consists of the following components:-
Contract Management Advertising Specification Evaluation Adjudication
2.9 BY-LAWS
Section 11(3)(m) provides municipal councils with the legislative authority to pass and implement by-laws for the betterment of the community within the terms of the legislation.
The following new by-laws of Hantam Municipality were developed during the 2013/14 financial period:-
By-laws introduced during year 2013/14Newly
developed
Revised PublicParticipat
ionYes/No
Dates of Publicati
on
By-lawGazettedYes/No
Date ofPublicati
on
Risk Management Policy
No Yes Yes
Debt Collection and Credit Control Policy (Tariffs)
No Yes Yes
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 37
The following by-laws were adopted/Revised and are published on the municipal website;-
1. Law Enforcement2. Cemeteries3. Keeping of Dogs Control4. Keeping of Animals, Poultry and Bees Control5. Street Trading Control6. Advertising signs and Disfigurement of the Fronts or Frontages
of Streets Control7. Water Services8. Building Control9. Municipal Taxi Ranks10. Electricity11. Fire Brigade12. Refuse Removal13. Caravan Parks14. Swimming Poll15. Municipal Commonage16. Fireworks17. Standing Orders18. Antennae Systems19. Impoundment of animals
2.10 WEBSITESIn terms of Section 75 of the MFMA the accounting officer of a municipality must place the following documents, set out in the table below, on the municipal website referred to in section 21A of the Municipal Systems Act:-
Documents published on Municipality Website Yes/No
Publishing
DateCurrent annual and adjustments budgets and all budget-related documents.All current budget-related policies yesThe previous Annual Report (2012/13) yes 6/6/2013The annual Report published/to be published (2013/14)
In proces
s
In process
All current performance Agreements required in terms of section 57(1)(b) of the MSA and resulting scorecards. (2013/14)
yes 6/12/2012
15/12/2012
All Service Delivery Agreements (ASLA) noLong Term Borrowing Contracts (DBSA) no
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 38
All SCM contracts above a prescribed value yesAn information statement containing a list of assets over a prescribed value that have been disposed of in terms of section 14(2) or (4)
no
Contracts agreed to which subsection (1) of section 33 apply, subject to subsection 3 of that section
n/a n/a
Public Private Partnership Agreements (section 120) n/a n/aAll quarterly reports tabled in council in terms of section 52(d)
public accountability and participation
A Survey on Public Satisfaction on Municipal Services is done annually. The Annual survey for the 2013/14 period was done in June 2014 in all wards. The surveys was conducted through the ward councilors.
The table below shows the outcome of the survey in terms of customer satisfaction:-
ANNUAL SATISFACTION SURVEY UNDERTAKEN DURING 2013/14Subject matter of survey
SurveyMethod
Survey date Nr. of people included insurvey
Survey results indicating satisfaction (%)
Overall satisfaction with service delivery and needs of the community
Questionnaire
June Councillors in all wards.(500)
45%
Overall Comments on survey conductedThe questions on the questionnaire of the survey focussed on the basic services such as water, electricity, waste removal, sanitation and roads, Communication, other services of the municipality, development needs and improvements and developments in the community.The survey was done through the ward councillors. Challenges experienced that had an impact on the outcomes were:- *not all external stakeholders of the municipality included in the survey.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 39
*ward councillors aligned to specific political party could influenced the outcome. *service providers and businesses to be included in the survey.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 40
CHAPTER 3 – SERVICE DELIVERY PERFORMANCE (PERFORMANCE REPORT PART I)
INTRODUCTION
The Hantam Local Municipality delivers certain services and functions to its residents, taking into the account the financial position and limited resources. The municipality render the following services against its strategic objectives and set performance targets during 2013/14:-Water servicesSanitationElectricityWaste removal & maintenance of landfill sitesHousing servicesRoads and storm waterLimited Traffic services Planning and local economic developmentLibrary servicesMuseumsParks and open spacesCommunity & sport facilitiesCemeteriesSocial programsFire servicesDisaster managementAnimal licencing and controlLaw Enforcement and security
COMPONENT A: BASIC SERVICES
INTRODUCTION TO BASIC SERVICESThe Hantam municipality delivers the following basic services to its residents:-Water provisionSanitation provisionElectricity
Waste managementHousing Free basic services and indigent support
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 42
3.1. WATER PROVISION
INTRODUCTION TO WATER PROVISIONThe residence in the municipal area have 100% access to water services. The municipality experience an extreme water crisis during 2013/14 in Loeriesfontein where all the water in the boreholes (wells), which provide the town with water, dried up. The municipality had to delivered water to the residence by truck on a daily basis. This have a tremendous financial impact on the municipality with a monthly expense of R150 000 rand per month. Alternative short-, medium- and long term plans are putting in place to try to manage the crises. Community meetings took place on this matter.
SOURCES OF WATER (*2011 StatsSA)Local Water SchemeBoreholeSpringRain water tankDam/Pool/Stagnant waterRiver/StreamWater vendorWater tankerOther
72%23%1%
0.7%1.9%
0%0.2%0.9%0.5%
*The dried up of wells/boreholes in Loeriesfontein have an impact on above.
WATER USAGE – HOUSEHOLDSWaterPiped water inside stand pipesPiped water inside yardPiped water on community stand: less 200m.Piped water on community stand: greater than 200m.BoreholeSpringRain-water tankDam/pool/stagnant water
22782620258224
3028666
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 43
River/streamWater vendorOther
-39
HOUSEHOLDS – WATER SERVICE DELIVERY 2013/14
DescriptionActual
Nr.OriginalBudget
Nr.
AdjustedBudget
Nr.
ActualNr
Total householdsHouseholds below minimum service levelProportion of households receiving 6kl free water
11 411
0
1115
11 411
0
1115
11 411
0
1115
11 411
0
1115
*Comments35 households of Swartkop does not billed due to plots not serviced, but have 100% access to water
EMPLOYEESDescription Total nr of posts
filledWater Services 21 posts
Capital Expenditure: Water Services
Capital ProjectTotal
Project Value
Actual Expenditure
Variance(R)%
Calvinia Water Treatment Plant
6 036 681.24
3.2 PROVISION OF SANITATION SERVICES
INTRODUCTION TO SANITATION PROVISIONAll residents in Hantam Municipality have access to toilets. The Bucket System has been eradicated within the municipal area. There are no sanitation backlogs in Hantam Municipality.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 44
Average SEWERAGE REPAIRMENTS 2013/14Sewerlines repaired 49Sewer blokkages 162Sewer inspections 146
T3.2.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 45
–100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
1,000
Hous
ehol
ds
Sanitation/sewerage: 2008/09
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 46
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Outcome Outcome Outcome Actual
No. No. No. No.Sanitation/sewerage: (above minimum level)
Flush toilet (connected to sewerage) 942 600 720 930
Flush toilet (with septic tank) 712 952 502 535
Chemical toilet 535 535 511 601
Pit toilet (ventilated) 124 135 103 100
Other toilet provisions (above min.service level) 13 13 15 11
Minimum Service Level and Above sub-total 2,325 2,236 1,851 2,178
Minimum Service Level and Above Percentage 68.9% 59.9% 55.5% 63.1%
Sanitation/sewerage: (below minimum level)
Bucket toilet 502 952 938 720
Other toilet provisions (below min.service level) 535 535 535 535
No toilet provisions 10 11 12 15
Below Minimum Service Level sub-total 1,047 1,498 1,485 1,271
Below Minimum Service Level Percentage 31.1% 40.1% 44.5% 36.9%
Total households 3,372 3,734 3,336 3,449
T3.2.3*Total number of households including informal settlements
Sanitation Service Delivery Levels
Description2008/09
*Households
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Actual Actual Actual Original Budget
Adjusted Budget Actual
No. No. No. No. No. No.
Formal Settlements
Total households 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Households below minimum service level 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Proportion of households below minimum service level 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Informal Settlements
Total households 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Households ts below minimum service level 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Proportion of households ts below minimum service level 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Households - Sanitation Service Delivery Levels below the minimum
2008/09
Households
T3.2.4
Description
T3.2.5Revise the above table to eliminate repetition of bars.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 47
25
7265
01020304050607080
Proportion of households with
access to sanitation*
Proportion of households with
access to sanitation
Proportion of households receiving
sanitation
Access to Sanitation
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators *Previous
Year*Previous
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Following
Year(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Provision of toilets within standard Additional Households (HHs) provided with minimum sanitation during the year (Number of HHs remaining without minimum sanitation at year end)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs
remaining)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs remaining)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs remaining)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs remaining)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs remaining)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs
remaining)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs remaining)
xxxxx additional HHs (xxx HHs
remaining)
T3.2.6
Waste Water (Sanitation) Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets
Service Objective xxx
2007/08 2008/09 2012/13Target Target
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
COMMENT ON SANITATION SERVICES PERFORMANCE OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Sanitation Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.2.7
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.2.8
Financial Performance 2008/09: Sanitation Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.2.9
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Sanitation ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.2.10
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 50
3.3 ELECTRICITY
INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRICITY
Note: Recent legislation includes the Electricity Amendment Acts 1989; 1994; 1995; and the Electricity Regulation Act 2006.Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments on your strategy for the provision of electricity at household level and the progress being made to redress service backlogs and achieve the National basic standard for Electricity provision by 2014 (include your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year). Set out measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Discuss the major successes achieved and challenges faced in 2008/09. Indicate how your municipality identifies and responds to those communities that are living in poverty and are deficient in this basic service. Give the name and extent of service provision of any municipal entity(ies) responsible for rendering Electricity Services within the municipality.
T3.3.1
Office accomodation and the electrical control room is adequate – the new budget will provide for equipment (specialised) to be procured.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 51
T3.3.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 52
–
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Electricity (at least min.service level)
Electricity - prepaid (min.service level)
Electricity (< min.service level)
Electricity - prepaid (< min. service level)
Electricity
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Actual Actual Actual Actual
No. No. No. No.
Energy: (above minimum level)
Electricity (at least min.service level) 655 547 565 523
Electricity - prepaid (min.service level) 565 587 846 565
Minimum Service Level and Above sub-total 1,220 1,134 1,411 1,088
Minimum Service Level and Above Percentage 52.8% 52.8% 66.3% 62.1%
Energy: (below minimum level)
Electricity (< min.service level) 112 123 124 124
Electricity - prepaid (< min. service level) 955 865 565 487
Other energy sources 24 26 28 54
Below Minimum Service Level sub-total 1,091 1,014 717 664
Below Minimum Service Level Percentage 47.2% 47.2% 33.7% 37.9%
Total number of households 2,310 2,147 2,127 1,753
Electricity Service Delivery Levels
T3.3.3
Households
Description
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 53
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Actual Actual Actual Original Budget
Adjusted Budget Actual
No. No. No. No. No. No.
Formal Settlements
Total households 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Households below minimum service level 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Proportion of households below minimum service level 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Informal Settlements
Total households 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Households ts below minimum service level 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Proportion of households ts below minimum service level 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Households - Electricity Service Delivery Levels below the minimum
2008/09
T3.3.4
Households
Description
Service Objectives
Service Indicators
2008/09 (*Previous
Year)
2008/09 (*Current
Year)
2008/09 (*Mid Year)
2012/13 (**Current
Year)
2012/13 (**Following
Year)
2007/08 2008/09
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix)
Provision of minimum supply of electricity
Propotionate reduction in 2007/08 backlog of households below minimum supply level
T1% reduction in HHs below the
2007/08 baseline levels (a revised
backlog of xxxxxx HHs)
T1% reduction in HHs below the
2007/08 baseline levels (a revised
backlog of xxxxxx HHs)
T1% reduction in HHs below the
2007/08 baseline levels (a revised
backlog of xxxxxx HHs)
T5% reduction in HHs below the
2007/08 baseline levels (a revised
backlog of xxxxxx HHs)
T5% reduction in HHs below the
2007/08 baseline levels (a revised
backlog of xxxxxx HHs)
A0% reduction in HHs below the
2007/08 baseline levels (a revised
backlog of xxxxxx HHs)
A1% reduction in HHs below the
2007/08 baseline levels (a revised
backlog of xxxxxx HHs)
T3.3.5
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the 2008/09 target that was set in the previous Budget round for which 2007/08 was the base year; *'Current Year' refers to the target for 2008/09 set in the budget for which 2008/09 was the base year and 'Mid Year' refers to the position included in the adjustment budget changes made for the 2008/09 base year. **2012/13 'Current Year' indeces were established in 2008/09 budget/IDP cycle; 2012/13 'Following Year' indeces are those to be included in the 2009/10 budget/IDP cycle. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Electricity Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets Actual Performance
Service Objective xxx
Service Targets
COMMENT ON ELECTRICITY SERVICES PERFORMANCE OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Electricity Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.3.6
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.3.7
Financial Performance 2008/09: Electricity Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.3.8
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Electricity ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the performance on agreements reached with ESKOM if not already covered. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.3.9
3.4 WASTE MANAGEMENT (THIS SECTION TO INCLUDE: REFUSE COLLECTIONS, WASTE DISPOSAL, STREET CLEANING AND RECYCLING)
INTRODUCTION TO WASTE MANAGEMENT
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments on the actions being taken to achieve the National standard for weekly Refuse Collection from every household by 2012 and discuss the major successes achieved and challenges faced in 2008/09. Discuss briefly progress made with waste disposal, street cleaning and recycling. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Indicate how your municipality identifies and responds to those communities that are living in poverty and are deficient in this basic service. Give the name and extent of service provision of any municipal entity(ies) responsible for rendering Refuse Services within the municipality.
T3.4.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 56
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 57
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Actual Actual Actual Actual
No. No. No. No.
Solid Waste Removal: (Minimum level)
Removed at least once a week 2,895 2,685 2,846 2,235
Minimum Service Level and Above sub-total 2,895 2,685 2,846 2,235
Minimum Service Level and Above percentage 50.9% 47.1% 51.5% 44.8%
Solid Waste Removal: (Below minimum level)
Removed less frequently than once a week 655 547 565 523
Using communal refuse dump 865 846 487 865
Using own refuse dump 655 547 565 523
Other rubbish disposal 502 952 938 720
No rubbish disposal 112 123 124 124
Below Minimum Service Level sub-total 2,790 3,015 2,678 2,755
Below Minimum Service Level percentage 49.1% 52.9% 48.5% 55.2%
Total number of households 5,685 5,699 5,523 4,991
T3.4.2
Solid Waste Service Delivery Levels
Description
Households
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Actual Actual Actual Original Budget
Adjusted Budget Actual
No. No. No. No. No. No.
Formal Settlements
Total households 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Households below minimum service level 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Proportion of households below minimum service level 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Informal Settlements
Total households 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Households ts below minimum service level 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Proportion of households ts below minimum service level 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Households - Solid Waste Service Delivery Levels below the minimumHouseholds
Description2008/09
T3.4.3
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators *Previous
Year*Previous
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Following
Year(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Provision of weekly collection service per household (HH)
Propotionate reduction in average weekly collection failures year on year (average number of collection failures each week)
xxx weekly collection
failures
% reduction from 2007/08
(xxx weekly collection failures)
% reduction from 2007/08
(xxx weekly collection failures)
% reduction from 2007/08
(xxx weekly collection failures)
% reduction from 2007/08
(xxx weekly collection failures)
% reduction from 2007/08
(xxx weekly collection failures)
% reduction from 2007/08 (xxx
weekly collection failures)
% reduction from 2007/08 (xxx
weekly collection failures)
Future capacity of existing and earmarked (approved use and in council possession) waste disposal sites
The amount of spare capacity available in terms of the number of years capacity available at the current rate of landfill usage
T0 years of unused landfill
capacity available
A0 years of unused landfill
capacity available
T1 years of unused landfill
capacity available
T1 years of unused landfill
capacity available
A1 years of unused landfill
capacity available
T2 years of unused landfill
capacity available
T5 years of unused landfill
capacity available
T5 years of unused landfill
capacity available
Proportion of waste that is recycled Volumes of waste recycled as a percentage of total volume of waste disposed of at landfill sites.
T0% of 2008/09 waste recycled
A0% of 2008/09 waste recycled
T1% of 2008/09 waste recycled
T1% of 2008/09 waste recycled
A1% of 2008/09 waste recycled
T2% of 2008/09 waste recycled
T5% of 2008/09 waste recycled
T5% of 2008/09 waste recycled
Proportion of landfill sites in compliance with the Enviromental Conservation Act 1989.
x% of landfill sites by volume that are being managed in compliance with the Enviromental Conservation Act 1989.
T0% of sites compliant
A0% of sites compliant
T1% of sites compliant
T1% of sites compliant
A1% of sites compliant
T2% of sites compliant
of sites compliant
T5% of sites compliant
T3.4.4
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Waste Management Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Solid Waste Magement Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.4.5
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Waste Disposal and Other Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.4.6
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.4.7
Financial Performance 2008/09: Solid Waste Management Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
COMMENT ON WASTE MANGEMENT SERVICE PERFORMANCE OVERALL:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete –Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.4.10
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 60
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.4.8
Financial Performance 2008/09: Waste Disposal and Other ServicesR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.4.9
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Waste Management ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
3.5 HOUSING
INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments on your strategy for the provision of housing and explain the actions being taken to redress service backlogs and deliver basic housing provision to the national standard. Make particular reference to the successes achieved and challenges faced in 2008/09 (include your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year). Set out measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Indicate how your municipality identifies and responds to those communities that are living in poverty and are deficient in this basic service. Give the name and extent of service provision of any municipal entity(ies) responsible for rendering Housing Services within the municipality.
T3.5.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 61
Year end Total households (including in formal and informal settlements)
Households in formal settlements
Percentage of HHs in formal settlements
2005/06 560000 350000 62.5%2006/07 654000 450000 68.8%2007/08 654000 500000 76.5%2008/09 684000 540000 78.9%
T3.5.2
Percentage of households with access to basic housing
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators *Previous
Year*Previous
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Following
Year(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Provision for housing for all households Additional houses provided during the year (Houses required at year end)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
xxxxxx additional houses
(xxxxxx houses required)
T3.5.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Housing Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE HOUSING SERVICE OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Housing Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.5.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.5.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Housing Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.5.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Housing ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed –Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.5.7
3.6 FREE BASIC SERVICES AND INDIGENT SUPPORT
INTRODUCTION TO FREE BASIC SERVICES AND INDIGENT SUPPORT
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments on the progress being made to achieve Free Basic Services and summarise your municipality’s policies towards indigent support.
T3.6.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 64
–10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
100
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Hous
ehol
ds ('
000)
Free Basic Household ServicesWater (6 kilolitres per household per month)
Sanitation (free minimum level service)
Electricity/other energy (50kwh per household per month)
Refuse (removed at least once a week)
T3.6.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 65
Total Access % Access % Access % Access % 2006/07 100,000 18,000 12,000 67% 10,000 56% 13,000 72% 7,000 39%2007/08 103,000 18,500 13,000 70% 11,000 59% 14,500 78% 8,000 43%2008/09 105,000 19,000 15,000 79% 12,000 63% 16,100 85% 9,000 47%
T3.6.3
Free Basic RefuseHouseholds earning less than R1,100 per month
Number of householdsFree Basic Services To Low Income Households
Total Free Basic Water Free Basic Sanitation Free Basic Electricity
2007/08Actual Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
BudgetWater 200 244 250 248 2%Waste Water (Sanitation) 220 240 250 245 2%Electricity 100 120 130 135 11%Waste Management (Solid Waste) 105 110 120 125 12%Total 625 714 750 753 5%
Financial Performance 2008/09: Cost to Municipality of Free Basic Services Delivered
Services Delivered 2008/09
T3.6.4
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators *Previous
Year*Previous
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Current
Year*Following
Year(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Provision of alternative support to low income households that do not receive all Free Basic Services
Low income households (LIHs) who do not receive all the free basic services but do receive alternative support (Total number of LIHs not in receipt of free basic services)
xxxx LIHs receiving
support (out of xxx LIHs in total)
xxxx LIHs receiving
support (out of xxx LIHs in total)
xxxx LIHs receiving
support (out of xxx LIHs in total)
xxxx LIHs receiving
support (out of xxx LIHs in total)
xxxx LIHs receiving
support (out of xxx LIHs in total)
xxxx LIHs receiving
support (out of xxx LIHs in total)
xxxx LIHs receiving support (out of xxx LIHs in
total)
xxxx LIHs receiving support (out of xxx LIHs in
total)
T3.6.5
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Free Basic Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON FREE BASIC SERVICES AND INDIGENT SUPPORT:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Comment on the support given to low earners and in particular those affected by shortfalls in basic service provision. Provide detail of indigent policy, expenditure and grants received in 0809 and explain how these have been translated into programmes designed to improve levels of self sufficiency.
T3.6.6
COMPONENT B: ROAD TRANSPORT This component includes: roads; transport; and waste water (stormwater drainage).
INTRODUCTION TO ROAD TRANSPORT
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Provide brief introductory comments on the strategy, priorities and provision regarding road development and maintenance and transport including public bus services.
T3.7.0
3.7 ROADS
INTRODUCTION TO ROADSDelete Directive note once comment is complete –Explain in brief your Roads strategy, the steps taken towards the implementation of the strategy and discuss the major successes achieved and challenges faced in 2008/09 (include your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year). Set out measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty. Give the name and extent of service provision of any municipal entity(ies) responsible for rendering Roads Services within the municipality.
T3.7.1
Replace the word “Tarred” with “Asphalt”.
Asphalted Road InfrastructureKilometers
Total asphalt
ed roads
New asphalt roads
Existing asphalt roads
re-asphalt
ed
Existing
asphalt roads
re-sheete
d
Asphalt roads
maintained
2006/072007/082008/09
T3.7.3
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 68
KilometersTotal gravel roads New gravel roads
constructedGravel roads upgraded
to tarGravel roads
graded/maintained2006/07 145 15 10 1002007/08 160 20 12 1202008/09 166 25 14 140
T3.7.2
Gravel Road Infrastructure
New Gravel - Tar Maintained New Re-worked Maintained2006/07 450000 1700000 250000 1950000 1050000 4000002007/08 475000 1800000 260000 2020000 1220000 5000002008/09 490000 1900000 280000 2300000 1300000 550000
T3.7.4
Cost of Construction/Maintenance
Gravel TarR' 000
T3.7.5
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 69
R 0
R 500,000
R 1,000,000
R 1,500,000
R 2,000,000
R 2,500,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Rand
Val
ueRoad Infrastructure costs
Gravel - New
Gravel - Tar
Gravel - Maintained
Tar - New
Tar - Re-worked
Tar - Maintained
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Elimination of gravel roads in townships Kilometers of gravel roads tarred (Kilometers of gravel road remaining)
xxx kms gravel roads tarred (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
xxx kms gravel roads tarred (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
xxx kms gravel roads tarred (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
xxx kms gravel roads tarred (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
xxx kms gravel roads tarred (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
Baseline (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
xxx kms gravel roads tarred (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
xxx kms gravel roads tarred (xxx kms gravel roads remaining)
Development of municipal roads as required xxx kms of municipal roads developed xxx kms xxx kms xxx kms xxx kms xxx kms xxx kms xxx kms xxx kms
T3.7.6
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Road Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ROADS OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Road Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.7.7
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.7.8
Financial Performance 2008/09: Road Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.7.9
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Road ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).Where provincial roads have been delegated to your municipality ensure that this is presented as an additional major issue in this section.
T3.7.10
3.8 TRANSPORT (INCLUDING VEHICLE LICENSING & PUBLIC BUS OPERATION)
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Explain in brief the transport strategy and the steps taken towards the implementation of the strategy and discuss the major successes achieved and challenge faced in 2008/09. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Outine approach to Public Bus Operation. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty. Give the name and extent of service provision of any municipal entity(ies) responsible for rendering Transport Services within the municipality.
T3.8.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 72
Concerning T3.8.2Delete Directive note once table is complete – State name of entity followed by ‘Entity’ where this is applicable. Line 3 is calculated by sampling throughout the year using different routes, days of the week and times of day. Line 6 is calculated by taking the numbers from lines, as follows: 5/4 x 100%. The average number of busses off the road is obtained by sampling the number off the road on different days at different times. Line 9 is calculated by taking numbers from lines as follows: 8/7 x 100%. T3.8.2.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 73
2007/08 2009/10Actual No. Estimate No. Actual No. Estimate No.
1 Passenger journeys2 Seats available for all journeys3 Average Unused Bus Capacity for all journeys %4 Size of bus fleet at year end5 Average number of Buses off the road at any one time %6 Proportion of the fleet off road road at any one time %7 No. of Bus journeys scheduled8 No. of journeys cancelled9 Proportion of journeys cancelled %
Municipal Bus Service Data
Details2008/09
T3.8.2
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.8.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Transport Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE T PERFORMANCE OF TRANSPORT OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Transport Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.8.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.8.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Transport Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.8.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Transport ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.8.7
3.9 WASTE WATER (STORMWATER DRAINAGE)
INTRODUCTION TO STORMWATER DRAINAGE
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments on the progress being made to improve stormwater drainage and discuss the major successes achieved and challenges faced in 2008/09 (include your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year). Set out measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to informal settlement and rural development. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty. Give the name and extent of service provision of any municipal entity(ies) responsible for rendering Stormwater Drainage Services within the municipality.
T3.9.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 76
T3.9.4
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 77
Total Stormwater measures
New stormwater measures
Stormwater measures upgraded
Stormwater measures maintained
2006/07 145 15 10 1002007/08 160 20 12 1202008/09 166 25 14 140
T3.9.2
Stormwater InfrastructureKilometers
New Upgraded Maintained2006/07 1,700,000 600,000 280,0002007/08 1,800,000 700,000 330,0002008/09 1,900,000 900,000 420,000
T3.9.3
Cost of Construction/Maintenance
Stormwater MeasuresR' 000
R 0R 200,000R 400,000R 600,000R 800,000
R 1,000,000R 1,200,000R 1,400,000R 1,600,000R 1,800,000R 2,000,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Stormwater infrastructure costs
New Upgraded Maintained
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Development of fully integrated stormwater management systems including wetlands and natural water courses
Phasing in of systems Strategy approval (Yes/No);
Timescale x yrs
Strategy approval (Yes/No);
Timescale x yrs
Strategy approval (Yes/No);
Timescale x yrs
Strategy approval (Yes/No);
Timescale x yrs
Strategy approval (Yes/No);
Timescale x yrs
Strategy approval
(Yes/No); x yrs remaining
Completion (Yes/No); x yrs
remaining
Completion (Yes/No); x yrs
remaining
T3.9.5
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Stormwater Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF STORMWATER DRAINAGE OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Stormmwater Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.9.6
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.9.7
Financial Performance 2008/09: Stormwater Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.9.8
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Stormwater ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.9.9
COMPONENT C: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
This component includes: planning; and local economic development.
INTRODUCTION TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Provide brief overview of the opportunities and challenges in the fields of economic development and physical planning field for your municipality.
T3.10.0
3.10 PLANNING
INTRODUCTION TO PLANNING
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Set out in brief the main elements of your planning strategies (and make particular reference to achievements and challenges in 2008/09); Town Planning; and building regulation and enforcement). Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 80
Set out measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.10.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 81
2007/08 2008/09 2007/08 2008/09 2007/08 2008/09Planning application receivedDetermination made in year of receiptDetermination made in following yearApplications withdrawnApplications outstanding at year end
T3.10.2
Applications for Land Use DevelopmentFormalisation of Townships Rezoning Built EnviromentDetail
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Approval or rejection of all build enviroment applications within a x weeks
Determination within x weeeks
Determination within x weeeks
Determination within 12 weeeks
Determination within 12 weeeks
Determination within x weeeks
Determination within 11 weeeks
Determination within 8 weeeks
Determination within 8 weeeks
Reduction in planning decisions overturned
X planning decisions
overturned
X planning decisions
overturned
5% planning decisions
overturned
5% planning decisions
overturned
X planning decisions
overturned
4% planning decisions
overturned
No planning decisions
overturned
No planning decisions
overturned
T3.10.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Determine planning application within a reasonable timescale
Planning Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Planning Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.10.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.10.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Planning Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.10.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Planning ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PHYSICAL PLANNING OVERALL:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.10.7
3.11 LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING TOURISM AND MARKET PLACES)
INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMIC DEVLOPMENT
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments on your economic development strategy and the contribution being made to the local economy in facilitating job creation through by Local Economic Development Services in 2008/09 (include your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year). Set out measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty. Give the name and extent of service provision of any municipal entity(ies) responsible for rendering Housing Services within the municipality.
T3.11.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 84
COMMENT ON LOCAL JOB OPPORTUNITIES:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Comment briefly on the short and longer term prospects for economic growth and development referring to the above. Include in this section references to Tourism and Market Places (including street traders)
T3.11.4
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 85
Sector 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09Agric, forestry and fishing 2 1.5 1.5Mining and quarrying 6 5 2Manufacturing 56 58 63Wholesale and retail trade 45 51 52Finance, property, etc. 51 48 52Govt, community and social services 23 25 25Infrastructure services 34 38 41
Total 217 226.5 236.5T3.11.2
Economic Activity by SectorR '000
Jobs2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
No. No. No.Agric, forestry and fishing 20,000 25,000 30,000 Mining and quarrying 400,000 435,000 372,000 Manufacturing 320,000 300,000 270,000 Wholesale and retail trade 190,000 200,000 210,000 Finance, property, etc. 275,000 255,000 235,000 Govt, community and social services 300,000 310,000 320,000 Infrastructure services 400,000 430,000 450,000
Total 1905000 1955000 1887000T3.11.3
Economic Employment by Sector
Sector
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 86
EPWP Projects Jobs created through EPWP projects
No. No.2006/07 40 2,0002007/08 50 2,9002008/09 66 4,500* - Extended Public Works Programme T3.11.6
Job creation through EPWP* projects
Details
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Training of people in essential skills: x, y, z Number of people trained (including retrained upskilled)
x people trained x people trained x people trained x people trained x people trained x people trained x people trained x people trained
T3.11.7
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Local Economic Development Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Local Economic Development Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.11.8
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.11.9
Financial Performance 2008/09: Local Economic Development Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original
budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.11.10
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Economic Development ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.11.11
COMPONENT D: COMMUNITY & SOCIAL SERVICESThis component includes: libraries and archives; museums arts and galleries; community halls; cemeteries and crematoria; child care; aged care; social programmes, theatres.
INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL SERVICESDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.52.0
3.52 LIBRARIES; ARCHIEVES; MUSEUMS; GALLERIES; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; OTHER (THEATRES, ZOOS, ETC)
INTRODUCTION TO LIBRARIES; ARCHIEVES; MUSEUMS; GALLERIES; COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 89
taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.52.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR LIBRARIES; ARCHIVES; MUSEUMS; GALLERIES; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; OTHER (THEATRES, ZOOS, ETC)
T3.52.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 90
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.52.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Libraries; Archives; Museums; Galleries; Community Facilities; Other Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Libraries; Archives; Museums; Galleries; Community Facilities; Other
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.52.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.52.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Libraries; Archives; Museums; Galleries; Community Facilities; OtherR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.52.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Libraries; Archives; Museums; Galleries; Community Facilities; OtherR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LIBRARIES; ARCHIVES; MUSEUMS; GALLERIES; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; OTHER (THEATRES, ZOOS, ETC) OVERALL:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.52.7
3.55 CEMETORIES AND CREMATORIUMS
INTRODUCTION TO CEMETORIES & CREMATORIUMS
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.55.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR CEMETORIES & CREMATORIUMS
T3.55.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 93
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.55.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Cemetories and Crematoriums Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF CEMETORIES & CREMATORIUMS F OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Cemetories and Cremotoriums
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.55.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.55.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Cemetories and Crematoriums R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.55.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Cemetories and Crematoriums R' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.55.7
3.56 CHILD CARE; AGED CARE; SOCIAL PROGRAMMES
INTRODUCTION TO CHILD CARE; AGED CARE; SOCIAL PROGRAMMES
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.56.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR CHILD CARE
T3.56.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 96
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.56.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Child Care; Aged Care; Social Programmes Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF CHILD CARE; AGED CARE; SOCIAL PROGRAMMES OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Child Care; Aged Care; Social Programmes
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.56.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.56.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Child Care; Aged Care; Social ProgrammesR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.56.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Child Care; Aged Care; Social ProgrammesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.56.7
COMPONENT E: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONThis component includes: pollution control; biodiversity and landscape; and costal protection.
INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments.
T3.59.0
3.59 POLLUTION CONTROL
INTRODUCTION TO POLLUTION CONTROL
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.59.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 99
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR POLLUTION CONTROL
T3.59.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 100
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Water: x% of all readings taken throughout the year on at least weekly to be found acceptable (clean) by National Standards
T0% clean A0% clean T1% clean T1% clean A1% clean T2% acceptable T5% acceptable T5% acceptable
Air: x% of all readings taken throughout the year on at least weekly to be found acceptable by National standard
T0% clean A0% clean T1% clean T1% clean A1% clean T2% acceptable T5% acceptable T5% acceptable
T3.59.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Water and air purity
Pollution Control Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROL OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Pollution Control
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.59.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.59.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Pollution ControlR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.59.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Pollution ControlR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.59.7
3.60 BIO-DIVERSITY; LANDSCAPE (INCL. OPEN SPACES); AND OTHER (EG. COASTAL PROTECTION)
INTRODUCTION BIO-DIVERSITY AND LANDSCAPE
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.60.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR BIO-DIVERSITY AND LANDSCAPE
T3.60.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 103
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.60.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Bio-Diversity; Landscape and Other Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF BIO-DIVERSITY; LANDSCAPE AND OTHER OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Bio-Diversity; Landscape and Other
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.60.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.60.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Bio-Diversity; Landscape and OtherR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.60.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Bio-Diversity; Landscape and OtherR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.60.7
COMPONENT F: HEALTHThis component includes: clinics; ambulance services; and health inspections.
INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH
Note: Recent legislation includes the National Health Act 2004.Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty. T.62.0
3.62 CLINICS
INTRODUCTION TO CLINICSDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.62.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 106
Concerning T3.62.2Delete Directive note once table is complete – Average patient waiting time and total medical staff availability on an average day are obtained but sampling staff and patients on different days at different times at regular intervals throughout the day T3.62.2.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 107
2006/07 2008/09Actual No. Estimate No. Actual No. Estimate No.
1 Average number of Patient visits on an average day2 Total Medical Staff available on an average day3 Average Pateint waiting time mins mins mins mins4 Number of HIV/AIDS tests undertaken in the year5 Number of tests in 4 above that proved positive
6Number of children that are immunised at under 1 year of age
7Child immunisation s above compared with the child population under 1 year of age % % % %
Service Data for ClinicsDetails 2007/08
T3.62.2
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Proportion of population visiting public health clinics
% of children under 1 year that are immunised.
T0% immunised A0% immunised T1% immunised T1% immunised A1% immunised T2% immunised T5% immunised T5% immunised
Proportion of population visiting public health clinics
% of those tested for HIV/AIDS that proved positive; (number of those tested)
T0% tested positive; (xxxxxx
tested)
A0% tested positive; (xxxxx
tested)
T1% tested positive; (xxxxx
tested)
T1% tested positive; (xxxxx
tested)
A1% tested positive; (xxxxx
tested)
T2% tested positive; (xxxxx
tested)
T5% tested positive;
(xxxxx tested)
T5% tested positive;
(xxxxx tested)
T3.62.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Clinics Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF CLINICS OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Clinics
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.62.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.62.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: ClinicsR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.62.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: ClinicsR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.62.7
3.63 AMBULANCE SERVICES
INTRODUCTION TO AMBULANCE SERVICESDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.63.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 110
Concerning T3.63.2Delete Directive note once table is complete –Average turnout and turn-round times are determined by logging the times taken from initial call to reaching an emergency incident and from initial call to the incident and then on to the medical facility and analysing the record. T3.63.2.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 111
2006/07 2008/09Actual No. Estimate No. Actual No. Estimate No.
1Number of patients taken to medical facilities during the year
2Average time from emergency call to arrival at the patient - in urban areas
3Average time from emergency call to arrival at the patient - in rural areas
4
Average time from emergency call to the transportation of patient to a medical facility - in urban areas
5
Average time from emergency call to the transportation of patient to a medical facility - in rural areas
6 No. ambulance7 No. paramedics
Ambulance Service DataDetails 2007/08
T3.63.2
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Average turnaround time in rural areas
T0 min on average
A0 min on average
T1 min on average
T1 min on average
A1 min on average
T2 min on average
T5 min on average
T5 min on average
Average turnaround time in urban areas
T0 min on average
A0 min on average
T1 min on average
T1 min on average
A1 min on average
T2 min on average
T5 min on average
T5 min on average
T3.63.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Ambulance turnaround time (Timeout to patients and back to medical facility)
Ambulances Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AMBULANCE SERVICES OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Ambulances
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.63.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.63.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: AmbulancesR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.63.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: AmbulancesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.63.7
3.64 HEALTH INSPECTION; FOOD AND ABBATOIR LICENSING AND INSPECTION; ETC
INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH INSPECTIONS; FOOD AND ABATTOIR LICENCING AND INSPECTIONS, ETC
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.64.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR HEALTH INSPECTION, Etc
T3.64.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 114
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.64.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Health Inspection, Etc Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF HEALTH INSPECTIONs, Etc OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Health Inspection, Etc
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.64.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.64.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Health Inspection, EtcR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.64.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Health Inspection, EtcR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.64.7
COMPONENT G: SECURITY AND SAFETYThis component includes: police; fire; disaster management, licensing and control of animals, and control of public nuisances, etc.
INTRODUCTION TO SECURITY & SAFETYDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments.
T3.65.0
3.65 POLICE
INTRODUCTION TO POLICEDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.65.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 117
Concerning T3.65.2Delete Directive note once table is complete – the number of Officers available is determined by sampling the number of officers in the field and in offices and stations on the same day, sampling different times of day and different days of the week throughout the year. T3.65.2.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 118
2006/07 2008/09Actual No. Estimate No. Actual No. Estimate No.
1Number of road traffic accidents during the year
2Number of bye-law inffringements attended
3Number of police officers in the field on an average day
4Number of police officers on duty on an average day
Metropolitan Police Service DataDetails 2007/08
T3.65.2
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Reduction in road accidents x% reduction in road accidents over the target for the previous
T0% reduction in 2008/09
A0% reduction in 2008/10
T1% reduction in 2008/11
T1% reduction in 2008/11
A1% reduction in 2008/12
T2% reduction in 2008/12
T5% reduction in 2008/13
T5% reduction in 2008/13
T3.65.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Police Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
Job Level 2007/08Police Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)Administrators No. No. No. No. %
Chief Police Officer & DeputyOther Police Officers
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Police Officers2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.65.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Police Officers Other employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.65.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: PoliceR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF POLICE OVERALL:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations). T.3.65.7
3.66 FIRE
INTRODUCTION TO FIRE SERVICESDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.66.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 121
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.65.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: PoliceR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Concerning T3.66.2Delete Directive note once table is complete - Average turnout times are determined by logging the times taken to reach an emergency incident from receipt of call and analysing the record. Average Fire appliances off the road. The average number of busses off the road is obtained by sampling the number off the road on different days at different times. T3.66.2.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 122
2006/07 2008/09Actual No. Estimate No. Actual No. Estimate No.
1 Total fires attended in the year2 Total of other incidents attended in the year3 Average turnout time - urban areas4 Average turnout time - rural areas5 Fire fighters in post at year end6 Total fire appliances at year end7 Average number of appliance off the road during
the year
Metropolitan Fire Service DataDetails 2007/08
T3.66.2
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Turnout time compared to National guidelines
% turn out within guidelines (total number of turn outs)
T0% within guidelines
A0% within guidelines or x if
x is larger
T1% within guidelines or A0% if that is
larger
70% within guidelines or A0% if that is
larger
A1% within guidelines
75% within guidelines or A1
if that is larger; (xxxxx
emergency turn outs in year)
95% within guidelines or A4
if that is larger; (xxxxx
emergency turn outs in year)
95% within guidelines or A4
if that is larger; (xxxxx
emergency turn outs in year)
T3.66.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Fire Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF FIRE SERVICES OVERALL:
Job Level 2007/08Fire Fighters Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)Administrators No. No. No. No. %
Chief Fire Officer & DeputyOther Fire Officers
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Fire Services2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.66.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Fire fighters Other employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.66.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Fire Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.66.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Fire ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.66.7
3.67 OTHER (DISASTER MANAGEMENT, ANIMAL LICENCING AND CONTROL, CONTROL OF PUBLIC NUISANCES AND OTHER)
INTRODUCTION TO DISASTER MANAGEMENT, ANIMAL LICENCING AND CONTROL, CONTROL OF PUBLIC NUISANCES, ETC
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.67.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT, ANIMAL LICENCING AND CONTROL, CONTROL OF PUBLIC NUISANCES, ETC
T3.67.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 125
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.67.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Disater Management, Animal Licencing and Control, Control of Public Nuisances, Etc Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT, ANIMAL LICENCING AND CONTROL CONTROL OF PUBLIC NUISANCES, ETC OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Disater Management, Animal Licencing and Control, Control of Public Nuisances, Etc
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.67.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.67.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Disater Management, Animal Licencing and Control, Control of Public Nuisances, EtcR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.67.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Disater Management, Animal Licencing and Control, Control of Public Nuisances, Etc
R' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.67.7
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 128
COMPONENT H: SPORT AND RECREATIONThis component includes: community parks; sports fields; sports halls; stadiums; swimming pools; and camp sites.
INTRODUCTION TO SPORT AND RECREATIONDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year. Refer to support given to those communities that are living in poverty.
T3.68.0
3.68 SPORT AND RECREATION
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR SPORT AND RECREATION
T3.68.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 129
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.68.2
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Sport and Recreation Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SPORT AND RECREATION OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Sport and Recreation
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.68.3
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.68.4
Financial Performance 2008/09: Sport and RecreationR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.68.5
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Sport and RecreationR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.68.6
COMPONENT I: CORPORATE POLICY OFFICES AND OTHER SERVICESThis component includes: corporate policy offices, financial services, human resource services, ICT services, property services.
INTRODUCTION TO CORPORATE POLICY OFFICES, EtcDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments.
T3.69.0
3.69 EXECUTIVE AND COUNCILThis component includes: Executive office (mayor; councilors; and municipal manager).
INTRODUCTION TO EXECUTIVE AND COUNCILDelete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year.
T3.69.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR THE EXECUTIVE AND COUNCIL
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 132
T3.69.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 133
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.69.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
The Executive and Council Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EXECUTIVE AND COUNCIL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: The Executive and Council
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.69.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.69.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: The Executive and CouncilR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.69.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: The Executive and CouncilR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.69.7
3.70 FINANCIAL SERVICES
INTRODUCTION FINANCIAL SERVICES
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year.
T3.70.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 136
Concerning T3.70.2Delete Directive note once table is complete – The proportion of account value billed is calculated by taking the total value of the year’s revenues collected against the bills raised in the year by the year’s billed revenues. T3.70.2.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 137
Actual for accounts billed in
year
Proportion of accounts value billed that were
collected in the year %
Billed in Year
Actual for accounts billed in
year
Proportion of accounts value billed that were
collected %
Billed in Year
Estmated outturn for
accounts billed in
year
Estimated Proportion of accounts billed that
were collected %
Property RatesElectricity - BElectricity - CWater - BWater - CSanitationRefuseOther
T3.70.2B- Basic; C= Consumption. See chapter 6 for the Auditor General's rating of the quality of the financial Accounts and the systems behind them.
2009/10R' 000
Debt Recovery
Details of the types of account
raised and recovered
2007/08 2008/09
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Increase in speed of payment of tariffs, tax demands, invoices
No more than x% of creditors raised (in Rand value) during the year outstanding (o/s) at year end
No more than T0% of current yr creditors o/s at
yr end
No more than A0% of current yr creditors o/s at
yr end
No more than T1% of current yr creditors o/s at
yr end
No more than T1% of current yr creditors o/s at
yr end
No more than A1% of current yr creditors o/s at
yr end
No more than T2% of current yr creditors o/s at
yr end
No more than T5% of current yr creditors o/s at yr
end
No more than T5% of current yr creditors o/s at yr
endReducing the number of invoices raised by increasing advance payment for services rendered (A project requiring partipation by all departments but let by the central finance department)
x% reduction in number of invoices raised over the previous year's target
T0% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
A0% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
T1% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
T1% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
A1% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
T2% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
T5% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
T5% reduction in invoices raised; target limit of
invoices
Improving speed of legal measures to recover revenues
Commence legal proceedings for recovery of revenues within 4 weeks of the due date
Legal proceeding within 4 weeks
of due date
Legal proceeding within 4 weeks
of due date
Legal proceeding within 4 weeks
of due date
Legal proceeding within 4 weeks
of due date
Legal proceeding within 4 weeks
of due date
% of legal proceeding commenced
within 4 weeks of due date
% of legal proceeding commenced
within 4 weeks of due date
% of legal proceeding commenced
within 4 weeks of due date
T3.70.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Financial Service Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF FINANCIAL SERVICES OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Financial Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.70.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.70.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Financial ServicesR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.70.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Financial ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.70.7
3.71 HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES
INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year.
T3.71.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES
T3.71.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 140
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.71.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Human Resource Services Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Human Resource Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.71.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.71.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Human Resource ServicesR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.71.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Human Resource ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.71.7
3.72 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) SERVICESThis component includes: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) services.
INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) SERVICES
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year.
T3.72.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR ICT SERVICES
T3.72.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 143
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following
Year(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.72.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
ICT Services Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ICT SERVICES OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: ICT Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.72.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.72.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: ICT Services R'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.72.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: ICT ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.72.7
3.73 PROPERTY; LEGAL; RISK MANAGEMENT AND PROCUREMENT SERVICESThis component includes: property; legal; risk management and procurement services.
INTRODUCTION TO PROPERTY; LEGAL; RISK MANAGEMENT AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year.
T3.73.1
SERVICE STATISTICS FOR PROPERTY; LEGAL; RISK MANAGEMENT AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES
T3.73.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 146
Service Objectives 2009/10Target Actual Actual
Service Indicators
*Previous Year *Previous
Year*Current
Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T3.73.3
Service Objective xxx
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority service objectives. The indicators and targets specified above (columns (i) and (ii)) must be incoporated in the indicator set for each municipality to which they apply. These are 'universal municipal indicators'. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets in the IDP must be fundable within approved budget provision. MSA 2000 chapter 5 sets out the purpose and character of Intergrated Development Plans (IDPs) and chapter 6 sets out the requirements for the reduction of performance management arrangement by municipalities in which IDPs play a key role.
Property; Legal; Risk Management; and Procurement Services Policy Objectives Taken From IDPOutline Service Targets 2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
COMMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PROPERTY SERVICES OVERALL:
2007/08Employees Posts Employees Vacancies (fulltime
equivalents)Vacancies (as a % of
total posts)No. No. No. No. %
0 - 3 1 1 1 0 0%4 - 6 3 3 3 0.5 17%7 - 9 6 6 6 1.5 25%
10 - 12 7 7 7 1 14%13 - 15 9 9 9 2.2 24%16 - 18 11 11 11 0.9 8%19 - 20 18 18 18 1 6%Total 55 55 55 7.1 13%
Employees: Property; Legal; Risk Management; and Procurement Services
Job Level
2008/09
Totals should equate to those included in the Chapter 4 total employee schedule. Employees and Posts numbers are as at 30 June. *Posts must be established and funded in the approved budget or adjustments budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated by taking the total number of working days lost (excluding weekends and public holidays) while a post remains vacant and adding together all such days lost by all posts within the same set (e.g. ‘senior management’) then dividing that total by 250 to give the number of posts equivalent to the accumulated days. T3.73.4
2007/08Actual Original Budget Adjustment
BudgetActual Variance to
Budget
Total Operational Revenue (excluding tarrifs) 120 125 100 95 -32%Expenditure: Employees 125 244 250 248 2% Repairs and Maintenance 25 244 250 248 2% Other 45 244 250 248 2%Total Operational Expenditure 195 732 750 744 2%Net Operational (Service) Expenditure 75 607 650 649 6%
T3.73.5
Financial Performance 2008/09: Property; Legal; Risk Management; and Procurement ServicesR'000
Details2008/09
Net expenditure to be consistent with summary table T5.1.2 in Chapter 5. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between the Actual and Original Budget by the Actual.
Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Variance from original budget
Total Project Value
Total All 260 326 378 31%
Project A 100 130 128 22% 280Project B 80 91 90 11% 150Project C 45 50 80 44% 320Project D 35 55 80 56% 90
T3.73.6
Capital Expenditure 2008/09: Property; Legal; Risk Management; and Procurement ServicesR' 000
Capital Projects
2008/09
Total project value represents the estimated cost of the project on approval by council (including past and future expenditure as appropriate.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain the variations from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Confirm your year 5 targets set out in the IDP schedule can be attained within approved budget provision and if not then state how you intend to rectify the matter. Explain the priority of the four largest capital projects and explain variances from budget for net operating and capital expenditure. Also explain any likely variation to the total approved project value (arising from 2008/09 and/or previous year actuals, or expected future variations).
T3.73.7
COMPONENT J: MISCELLANEOUSThis component includes: the provision of Airports, Abattoirs, and Forestry as municipal enterprises.
INTRODUCTION TO MISCELLANEOUS
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide brief introductory comments. Set out your top 3 service delivery priorities and the impact you have had on them during the year. Explain the measures taken to improve performance and the major efficiencies achieved by your service during the year.
T3.75.0
COMPONENT K: ORGANISATIONAL PERFOMANCE SCORECARDThis component includes: Annual Performance Scorecard Report for the current year.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 149
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 150
Strategic Focus
Area (IDP)
No Key Performance
Indicator
Baseline (previous years actual)
Demand Backlog Annual Target (year)
5 Year Target
Means of Verification
Unit of Measure
Quarterly target
Quarterly actual
Status (Achieved
/Not achieved)
Measures taken to improve
performance
Performance Monitoring
Quality Assurance comment
Management Response
Internal Audit
Comment
Portfolio of
Evidence
Plan Number: Plan Name
Note: Set out the ke y pl ans as per perfomance scorecard,e.g Plan 1;susta in our natura l and bui ld environment, Pl an 2- economic development and job creati on, Plan 3-qua l ity l eaving e nvironments, Plan 4- s afe he althy and s ecure envi ronment, Pl an 5-e mpoweri ng our ci tize n, Plan 6- promoti ng cul tura l divers ity,Plan 7- good governance, Plan- 8 fi nancia l vi abi l i ty and s usta inabi l i ty. T3.76
CHAPTER 4 – ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
(PERFORMANCE REPORT PART II)
Hantam Municipality currently employs 163 officials. During the 2013/14 financial year, 8 services were terminated. The turnover rate is 20%. Two senior posts, Head Corporate Services and Head Technical Services were vacant. The Head Corporate Services was filled on 1 March 2014. The Head Technical Services post was advertised but not filled. The challenge has been to find a suitable candidate.The primary objective of Human Resource Management is to render an innovative HR service that addresses filling of vacant posts, interviews, appointments, skills development, job evaluation and disciplinary hearings.
COMPONENT A: INTRODUCTION TO THE MUNICIPAL PERSONNEL4.1 EMPLOYEE TOTALS, TURNOVER AND VACANCIES
EMPLOYEESDescription Total Employees Approved posts Vacancies Vacancy (%)WaterSanitationElectricityWaste ManagementHousingBuilding ControlLocal Economic Development
2113
630
111
10
2113
730
111
10
00100000
00
00000
Community Services (Libraries)TrafficCorporate ServicesInfrastructureSport & RecreationStreetsCemeteries & Nature ReserveFinance (General)Finance (Income)Finance (Expenditure)Supply Chain Management
78
123
1321
610
22
88
153
1328
610
32
1030070010
0
00
00
0
Vacancy RateDesignations Total
Approved Posts
Variances Variance (%)
Municipal Manager 1 0 0CFO 1 0 0Other 56 Managers (Finance posts)
0 0 0
Senior Management (levels 13-15) excluding finance posts.
2 1
Senior Management (levels 13-15) finance posts.
1
Highly skilled supervision: levels 9-12 (excl. finance) 15Highly skilled supervision: levels 9-12 ( finance)
6
Total 26
Turn Over Rate
DetailsTotal Appointments as of beginning of Financial Year (No)
Terminations during the
Financial year
Turn OverRate
2013/14 163 8 20%
COMMENT ON VACANCIES AND TURNOVER:The turnover rate is 20%. The turnover rate increase by 15% from the previous year. The post of the Head Technical Services are not filled. The post was advertised, but applicants did not meet
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 152
requirements as set out in the advertisements. The responsibilities of the post are currently being fulfilled by various competent officials.
COMPONENT B: MANAGING THE MUNICIPAL WORKFORCE
INTRODUCTION TO MUNICIPAL WORKFORCE MANAGEMENTSection 67 of the Municipal Systems Act requires municipalities to develop and adopt appropriate systems and procedures to ensure fair, efficient, effective and transparent personnel administration in accordance with the Employment Equity Act 1998.Managing the municipal workforce refers to analysing and coordinating employee behaviour. The Local Labour Forum serves as a tool to ensure working relations between the workforce, management and council. The workforce is governed by collective agreements.4.2 POLICIES
Policies assist municipalities in decision making and to guide all employees to comply with standards. The following policies were adopted by council and reviewed in June 2014:-
1. Finance Policy2. Personnel Policy3. Administration Policy4. Risk Management Policy5. Credit Control and Debt Collection6. Customer Care
The above policies include:-Student workersSmokingActing Overtime and standbyAidsCommunicationDelegationLeaveTravel allowanceBonusesMotor schemeTemporary workersMedical check up
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 153
Housing schemeRecruitmentSkills retentionAreas have been identified where policies have to being developed.4.3 INJURIES, SICKNESS AND SUSPENSIONS
Number and Cost of Injuries on DutyType of Injury Injury
Leave TakenDays
Employees using
injury leaveNo.
Proportion employees using sick leave (%)
Average Injury Leave
per employe
eDays
Total Estimate
d Cost
Required basic medical attention only
27 0 100 3 8100
Temporary total disablement
0 0 0 0 0
Permanent disablement
0 0 0 0 0
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0Total 27 0 100 3 8100
Number of sick leave days
Descriptions Total sick leavedays
Employee’s using sick leave (nr.)
Total employees in
post
Average sick leave per employee
(days)Lower skilled (L1-2) 0 0 0 0Skilled (L3-5) 310 42 79 7.4Highly skilled production (L6-8)
347 29 47 11.9
Highly skilled supervision(L9-12)
151 11 16 13.7
Senior Management(L13-15)
0 0 0 0
MM and S56 7 2 4 3.5
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 154
Disciplinary cases of financial misconductPOSITION NATURE OF ALLEGED
MISCONDUCTDISCIPLINARY ACTIONTAKEN
DATE FINALIZED
Cashier Not following procedures:Theft;dishonesty;malpractice(No loss – recovered)
Dismissed 26/08/20139/10/2013 (appeal)
Senior Clerk Not following procedures:Theft;dishonesty;malpractice;Selling of municipal erven while moratorium on it.(No loss – recovered)
Dismissed 26/08/201302/04/2014 (arbitration)
CommentSuspensions not for more than four (4) months.
4.4 PERFORMANCE REWARDS
Section 51(d) of the Municipal Systems Act (MSA) requires that performance plans, on which rewards are based should be aligned with the IDP. Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plans should be consistent with the higher level IDP targets and must be incorporated appropriately in Performance Agreements as the basis of performance reports.
PERFORMANCE REWARDS
DesignationsGender Total Nr.
beneficiaries
% Awarded
M F
Municipal Manager & S56 Managers
3 1 4 Between12-14%
COMMENT ON PERFORMANCE REWARDS:
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 155
Performance Evaluations are only being conducted to 1st levels, Section 54A (Municipal Manager) and Section 56 managers. Bonuses were only awarded to these managers. The performance bonuses paid was for the evaluation period 2012/13 Evaluations and scorings were concluded through a Technical SDBIP/Performance Plan Bonuses were awarded between 12%-14% of annual remuneration (salary) and based on outcomes of individual scores. Two of the posts were in acting positions.
COMPONENT C: CAPACITATING THE MUNICIPAL WORKFORCE
INTRODUCTION TO WORKFORCE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Note: MSA 2000 S68 (1) requires municipalities to develop their human resource capacity to a level that enables them to perform their functions and exercise their powers in an economical, effective, efficient and accountable way.Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Discuss the way ahead and the improvements made and the challenges faced for capacity development in your municipality.
T4.5.0
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 156
Skills development Training
Management LevelGender Nr. of
EmployeesTotal
Female
Male
MM and S56 2 2 4Legislators, senior officials and managers
6 8 14
Professionals 3 4 7Technicians and associate professionals
3 4 7
Clerks 17 9 26Service and sales workers 2 6 8Plant and machine operators and assemblers
0 21 21
Elementary Occupations 16 60 76TOTALS 49 114 163
Financial Competency Development
Description
Total Nr. of officials employed
by municipalReg. 14(4)(a) and
(c)
Total nr. of officials whose
performance agreements comply with
regulation 16(Reg. 14(4)(b) and
(d)
Total nr. of officials that meet prescribed
competency levels
Financial OfficialsAccounting OfficerChief Financial OfficerSenior ManagersAny other officialsSupply Chain Management officialsSCM official
112
10
1
0025
1
0 (in process)0 (in process)
24
1Total 15 8 7
COMMENTS ON COMPETENCY LEVELThe Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer are still busy with their MMC training and will be finished with their training by 2014. 5 of the officials stated in “any other officials” above are financial interns of which they are currently busy with their MMC training.
Types of TrainingDate/Month of
TrainingNr. of Officials Department Type of Training
August 2013 17 Finance; Corporate Services; Community Services
MFMP ; MMC ; First Aid
September 2013 2 Finance MFMP; MMC
October 201317 Finance ;
Community ServicesMFMP ; MMCSafety Technologies
November 2013 3 FinanceCorporate Services
MFMP; MMC
December 2013 0 Non NonJanuary 2014 0 Non NonFebruary 2014
6FinanceCorporate ServicesCommunity Services
MFMP ; MMCLegal Electric RequirementsEffective Project Management
March 2014 7 Corporate ServicesFinance
MFMP ; MMC
April 2014 8 FinanceCorporate Services
MFMP ; MMC
May 2014 8 FinanceCorporate Services
MFMP ; MMC
June 2014 8 FinanceCorporate Services
MFMP ; MMCRecord ManagementPay Day
Training ExpenditureOPERATING FMG LGSETA
49 461 555 106 97 340
MANAGING THE WORKFORCE EXPENDITURE
Introduction
EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 158
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WHOSE SALARY WERE INCREASED DUE TO THEIR POSITION BEING UPGRADED
BENEFICIARIES GENDER TOTAL
LOWER SKILLED (L1-2)SKILLED (L3-5)HIGHLY SKILLED PRODUCTION (L6-8)SENIOR MANAGEMENT (L13-16)MM AND S56 MANAGERS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL 0 0
EMPLOYEES WHOSE SALARY LEVELS EXCEED THE GRADE DETERMINED BY JOB EVALUATION
OCCUPATION NR. OF EMPLOYEES
JOB EVALUATION LEVEL
REMUNERATION LEVEL
REASON FOR DEVIATIONS
0 0 0 0 non
*Job evaluations done for the 2013/14 were not finalized due to council approval. Cases still pending.
EMPLOYEES NOT APPOINTED TO POSTS NOT APPROVED
Department Level Date of appointment
No. appointed Reason for appointment
when no. establish post
exist
0 0 0 0 non
*No appointment for non-approved posts.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 159
COMMENT ON SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED EXPENDITURE AND ON THE FINANCIAL COMPETENCY REGULATIONS:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Comment on the adequacy of training plans and the effectiveness of implementation at your municipality. Explain variances between actual and budgeted expenditure. Also comment on the adequacy of funding (e.g. is it intended to increase or decrease this level of spending in future years and how is the value of the training activity assessed?) Refer to MF MA Competency Regulations, the range of officials to which it relates and the deadline of 2013 by which it will become fully effective. Discuss the progress made on implementation at your municipality as reflected in T4.5.4 above.
T4.5.4
COMPONENT D: MANAGING THE WORKFORCE EXPENDITURE
INTRODUCTION TO WORKFORCE EXPENDITURE
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Explain the importance of managing workforce expenditure, the pressures to overspend and how spending is controlled (e.g. within approved
Description A. Total number of officials employed by municipality (Regulation 14(4)(a) and (c))
B. Total number of officials employed by municipal entities (Regulation 14(4)(a) and (c)
Consolidated: Total of A and B
Consolidated: Competency assessments completed for A and B (Regulation 14(4)(b) and (d))
Consolidated: Total number of officials whose performance agreements comply with Regulation 16 (Regulation 14(4)(f))
Consolidated: Total number of officials that meet prescribed competency levels (Regulation 14(4)(e))
Financial OfficialsAccounting officer 0 0 0 0 0 0Chief financial officer 0 0 0 0 0 0Senior managers 0 0 0 0 0 0Any other financial officials 0 0 0 0 0 0
Supply Chain Management Officials
Heads of supply chain management units 0 0 0 0 0 0
Supply chain management senior managers 0 0 0 1 1 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 1 1T4.5.2
Financial Competency Development: Progress Report*
* This is a statutory report under the National Treasury: Local Government: MFMA Competency Regulations (June 2007)
establishment and against budget and anticipated vacancy rates arising from turnover). Also explain how municipality seeks to obtain value for money from work force expenditure.
T4.6.0
4.6 EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE
Source: MBRR SA22T4.6.1
COMMENT ON WORKFORCE EXPENDITURE:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Explain the spending pattern in the context of the actual and two previous years plus the budget year. Refer to implications for workforce ratio in Chapter 5. Comment on factors influencing workforce expenditure during the year
T4.6.1.1Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 161
19,000
20,000
21,000
22,000
23,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Workforce Expenditure Trends (R' 000)
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 162
Beneficiaries Gender TotalFemale #REF!Male #REF!Female #REF!Male #REF!Female #REF!Male #REF!Female #REF!Male #REF!Female #REF!Male #REF!Female #REF!Male #REF!
Total #REF!
T4.6.2Those with disability are shown in brackets '(x)' in the 'Number of beneficiaries' column as well as in the numbers at the right hand side of the column (as illustrated above).
MM and S 57
Number Of Employees Whose Salaries Were Increased Due To Their Positions Being Upgraded
Lower skilled (Levels 1-2)
Skilled (Levels 3-5)
Highly skilled production (Levels 6-8)
Highly skilled supervision (Levels9-12)
Senior management (Levels13-16)
Occupation Number of employees Job evaluation level Remuneration level Reason for deviation
T4.6.3
Employees Whose Salary Levels Exceed The Grade Determined By Job Evaluation
.
COMMENT ON UPGRADED POSTS AND THOSE THAT ARE AT VARIANCE WITH NORMAL PRACTICE:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Comment on T4.6.2 as appropriate and give further explanations as necessary with respect to T4.6.3 and T4.6.4
T4.6.5
DISCLOSURES OF FINANCIAL INTERESTS
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Refer to disclosures made by officials and councillors concerning their financial interests as required by PM Regulations 805 of 2006 are set out in Appendix J. Make other comments as appropriate.
T4.6.6
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 163
Department Level Date of appoinment No. appointed
Reason for appointment
when no established post exist
T4.6.4
Employees not appointed to posts not approved
CHAPTER 5 – FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 5 contains information regarding financial performance and highlights specific accomplishments. The chapter comprises of three components: Component A: Statement of Financial Performance Component B: Spending Against Capital Budget Component C: Other Financial MattersDelete Directive note once comment is complete - Please explain how your municipality sought to contain inflationary pressures during the financial year. Take the 5 most expensive consultancy arrangements in 2008/09 and explain the costs, the reasons for the engagements and the results. Include such other introductory remarks as you wish. T5.0.1
COMPONENT A: STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note: Statements of Revenue Collection Performance by vote and by source are included at Appendix K.Delete Directive note once comment is complete - This component provides an overview of the financial performance of the municipality and focuses on the financial health of the municipality T5.1.0
5.1 STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 165
2007/08Actual Original
BudgetAdjusted Budget
Actual Original Budget
Adjustments Budget
Financial PerformanceProperty rates – – – – % %Service charges – – – – % %Investment revenue – – – – % %Transfers recognised - operational – – – – % %Other own revenue – – – – % %
Total Revenue (excluding capital transfers and contributions)
– – – – % %
Employee costs – – – – % %Remuneration of councillors – – – – % %Depreciation & asset impairment – – – – % %Finance charges – – – – % %Materials and bulk purchases – – – – % %Transfers and grants – – – – % %Other expenditure – – – – % %
Total Expenditure – – – – % %Surplus/(Deficit) – – – – % %
Transfers recognised - capital – – – – % %Contributions recognised - capital & contributed assets – – – – % %
Surplus/(Deficit) after capital transfers & contributions – – – – % %Share of surplus/ (deficit) of associate – – – – % %
Surplus/(Deficit) for the year – – – – % %
Capital expenditure & funds sourcesCapital expenditure – – – – – –
Transfers recognised - capital – – – – – – Public contributions & donations – – – – – – Borrowing – – – – – – Internally generated funds – – – – – –
Total sources of capital funds – – – – – – Financial position
Total current assets – – – – – – Total non current assets – – – – – – Total current liabilities – – – – – – Total non current liabilities – – – – – – Community wealth/Equity – – – – – –
Cash flowsNet cash from (used) operating – – – – – – Net cash from (used) investing – – – – – – Net cash from (used) financing – – – – – –
Cash/cash equivalents at the year end – – – – – –
Cash backing/surplus reconciliationCash and investments available – – – – – – Application of cash and investments – – – – – –
Balance - surplus (shortfall) – – – – – –
Asset managementAsset register summary (WDV) – – – – – – Depreciation & asset impairment – – – – – – Renewal of Existing Assets – – – – – – Repairs and Maintenance – – – – – –
Free servicesCost of Free Basic Services provided – – – – – – Revenue cost of free services provided – – – – – – Households below minimum service level
Water: - - - - - - Sanitation/sewerage: - - - - - - Energy: - - - - - - Refuse: - - - - - -
T5.1.1
Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between actual and original/adjustments budget by the actual. This table is aligned to MBRR table A1
Financial SummaryR' 000
DescriptionCurrent Year 2008/09 2008/09 Variance
COMMENT ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Comment on variances
T5.1.3
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 166
2007/08
Actual Original Budget Adjustments Budget Actual Original Budget Adjustments
Budget
Operating CostWater 26,485 23,572 28,075 23,042 -2.30% -21.84%
Waste Water (Sanitation) 8,541 8,285 9,054 8,456 2.02% -7.07%
Electricity 12,355 10,254 12,478 13,219 22.43% 5.61%
Waste Management 14,232 13,235 13,662 12,097 -9.41% -12.94%
Housing 6,542 5,496 5,954 6,346 13.40% 6.19%
Component A: sub-total 1,865 1,622 1,865 1,510 -7.41% -23.46%
Waste Water (Stormwater Drainage) 5,643 5,530 5,925 5,304 -4.26% -11.70%
Roads 5,643 5,530 5,925 5,304 -4.26% -11.70%
Transport 5,322 4,470 5,747 4,630 3.45% -24.14%
Component B: sub-total 8,455 8,455 8,624 9,554 11.50% 9.73%
Planning 1,254 1,003 1,191 1,354 25.93% 12.04%
Local Economic Development 2,516 2,063 2,264 2,340 11.83% 3.23%
Component B: sub-total 6,846 6,230 7,256 6,640 6.19% -9.28%
Planning (Strategic & Regulatary) 12,546 10,413 11,793 11,542 9.78% -2.17%
Local Economic Development 2,355 2,190 2,425 2,402 8.82% -0.98%
Component C: sub-total 48,542 40,776 48,542 46,115 11.58% -5.26%
Community & Social Services 4,565 3,698 4,337 4,291 13.83% -1.06%
Enviromental Proctection 5,649 4,971 6,157 4,971 0.00% -23.86%
Health 5,649 4,971 6,157 4,971 0.00% -23.86%
Security and Safety 5,649 4,971 6,157 4,971 0.00% -23.86%
Sport and Recreation 5,649 4,971 6,157 4,971 0.00% -23.86%
Corporate Policy Offices and Other 5,649 4,971 6,157 4,971 0.00% -23.86%
Component D: sub-total 32,808 28,552 35,122 29,145 2.04% -20.51%
Total Expenditure 179,353 157,791 181,274 169,118 6.70% -7.19%
T5.1.2
In this table operational income (but not levies or tarrifs) is offset agaist operational expenditure leaving a net operational expenditure total for each service as shown in the individual net service expenditure tables in chapter 3. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between actual and original/adjustments budget by the actual.
2008/09 2008/09 Variance
Financial Performance of Operational ServicesR '000
Description
5.2 GRANTS
COMMENT ON OPERATING TRANSFERS AND GRANTS:
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 167
2007/08Actual Budget Adjustments
BudgetActual Original
Budget (%)
Adjustments Budget
(%)
Operating Transfers and Grants
National Government: 33,977 – – 24,756
Equitable share 21,565 17,303 #REF!
Municipal Systems Improvement 4,524 2,182 #REF!
Department of Water Affairs 6,665 4,283 #REF!
Levy replacement 1,222 988 #REF!
Other transfers/grants [insert description]
Provincial Government: 18,925 – – 5,994
Health subsidy 8,645 3,786 #REF!
Housing 4,865 1,502 #REF!
Ambulance subsidy 846 219 #REF!
Sports and Recreation 4,568 489 #REF!
Other transfers/grants [insert description] #REF!
District Municipality: – – – –
[insert description] #REF!
#REF!
Other grant providers: – – – –
[insert description] #REF!
#REF!
Total Operating Transfers and Grants 52,902 – – 30,751
T5.2.1Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between actual and original/adjustments budget by the actual.
Description
R' 000Grant Performance
2008/09 2008/09 Variance
Note: For Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) see T5.8.3. For other conditional transfers including Neighborhood Development Partnership Grant (NDPG); Public Transport Infrastructure and Systems Grant (PITS) see Appendix L.Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Comment on the variances in the above table and other and indicate high value projects & total the remaining project.
T5.2.2
Insert table note advising municipalities to indicate high value projects & total the remaining projects.COMMENT ON CONDITIONAL GRANTS AND GRANT RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Use this box to provide additional information on grant benefits or conditions and reason for acceptance.
T5.2.4
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 168
Details of Donor Actual Grant'07/08
Actual Grant'08/09
08/09Municipal Contribution
Date Grant terminates
Date Municipal contribution terminates
Nature and benefit from the grantreceived, include description of any contributions in kind
A - "Project 1"A - "Project 2"B - "Project 1"B - "Project 2"
A - "Project 1"A - "Project 2"B - "Project 1"B - "Project 2"
A - "Project 1"A - "Project 2"B - "Project 1"B - "Project 2"
T5.2.3
Grants Received From Sources Other Than Division of Revenue Act (DORA)
Parastatals
Foreign Governments/Development Aid Agencies
Private Sector / Organisations
Provide a comprehensive response to this schedule
5.3 ASSET MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION TO ASSET MANAGEMENT
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Provide a brief overview on Asset Management as practiced within your organisation and outline the key elements of your Asset Management Policy. Explain how asset management is organised, the staff involved and the key delegations. Describe key issues under development. Indicate the approach to capacity development for this activity. Refer to the illustrations of asset management approach in relation to the new assets set out below.
T5.3.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 169
COMMENT ON ASSET MANAGEMENT:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – With reference to the three projects approved in the year, set out above, describe how these projects were evaluated from a cost and revenue perspective, including Municipal tax and tariff implications (See MFMA section 19(2) (a) & (b) and MSA section 74(2)(d),(e)&(i)). Ensure that these projects are maintained on files that are readily accessible for audit inspection. Financial data regarding asset management may be sourced from MBRR Table A9
T5.3.3
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 170
NameDescriptionAsset TypeKey Staff InvolvedStaff Responsibilities
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Capital ImplicationsFuture Purpose of AssetDescribe Key IssuesPolicies in Place to Manage Asset
NameDescriptionAsset TypeKey Staff InvolvedStaff Responsibilities
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Capital ImplicationsFuture Purpose of AssetDescribe Key IssuesPolicies in Place to Manage Asset
NameDescriptionAsset TypeKey Staff InvolvedStaff Responsibilities
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Capital ImplicationsFuture Purpose of AssetDescribe Key IssuesPolicies in Place to Manage Asset
T5.3.2
TREATMENT OF THE THREE LARGEST ASSETS ACQUIRED 2008/09Asset 1
Asset Value
Asset 2
Asset Value
Asset 3
Asset Value
COMMENT ON REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURE:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Comment on adequacy of Repair & Maintenance Expenditure and variances show in T5.3.4 above and on the implications of the proportion of operating budget spend on repairs and maintenance over the past four years set out below. Note that the repairs and maintenance expenditure in T5.3.4 must reconcile with the operational repairs and maintenance expenditure for all services set out in Chapter 3.
T5.3.4.1
5.4 FINANCIAL RATIOS BASED ON KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 171
Original Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Budget variance
Repairs and Maintenance Expenditure 125 129 128 -2.40%T5.3.4
Repair and Maintenance Expenditure 2008/09R' 000
T5.4.1
T5.4.2
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 172
1.1
0.6
1.2
1.0
–
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Liquidity Ratio
Liquidity Ratio – Measures the municipality’s ability to pay its bills and is calculated by dividing the monetary assets by the municipality’s current liabilities. A higher ratio is better.
1.5
1.9
1.4
0.8
–0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Cost Coverage
Cost Coverage– It explains how many months expenditure can be covered by the cash and other liquid assets available to the Municipality excluding utilisation of grants
T5.4.3
T5.4.4
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 173
64.0%
62.0%
68.0%
60.5%
56.0%
58.0%
60.0%
62.0%
64.0%
66.0%
68.0%
70.0%
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Outstanding Service Debtors to Revenue
Outstanding Service Debtors to Revenue – Measures how much money is still owed by the community for water, electricity, waste removal and sanitation compared to how much money has been paid for these services. It is calculated by dividing the total outstanding debtors by the total annual revenue. A lower score is better.
2.1
1.3 1.5
1.2
–
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Debt Coverage
Debt Coverage– The number of times debt payments can be accomodated within Operating revenue (excluding grants) . This in turn represents the ease with which debt payments can be accomodated by the municipality
T5.4.5
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 174
74.0%
98.0%
69.0% 65.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Capital Charges to Operating Expenditure
Capital Charges to Operating Expenditure ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of capital interest and principle by the total operating expenditure.
T5.4.6
T5.4.7
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 175
77.0%69.0%
89.0%
53.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Employee costs
Employee cost – Measures what portion of the revenue was spent on paying employee costs. It is calculated by dividing the total employee cost by the difference between total revenue and capital revenue.
T5.4.8
COMMENT ON FINANCIAL RATIOS:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Comment on the financial health of the municipality / municipal entities revealed by the financial ratios set out above. These ratios are derived from table SA8 of the MBRR.
T5.4.9
COMPONENT B: SPENDING AGAINST CAPITAL BUDGET
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 176
80.0%
68.0%65.0%
91.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Repairs & Maintenance
Repairs & Maintenance
Repairs and Maintenance – This represents the propotion of operating expenditure spent and is calculated by dividing the total repairsand maintenace.
Data used from MBRR SA8
INTRODUCTION TO SPENDING AGAINST CAPITAL BUDGETDelete Directive note once comment’s completed – Capital expenditure relates mainly to construction projects that will have value lasting over many years. Capital expenditure is funded from grants, borrowings and operating expenditures and surpluses. Component B deals with capital spending indicating where the funding comes from and whether Municipalities are able to spend the available funding as planned. In this component it is important to indicate the different sources of funding as well as how these funds are spend. Highlight the 5 largest projects (see T5.7.1) and indicate what portion of the capital budget they use. In the introduction briefly refer to these key aspects of capital expenditure (usually relating to new works and renewal projects) and to Appendices M (relating to the new works and renewal programmes), N (relating to the full programme of full capital projects, and O (relating to the alignment of projects to wards).
T5.5.0
5.5 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
T5.5.1
5.6 SOURCES OF FINANCE
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 177
12.03%
87.97%
–
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
R m
illio
n
Capital Expenditure 2008/09
Capital Expenditure
Operating Expenditure
COMMENT ON SOURCES OF FUNDING:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Explain any variations from the approved budget of more than 10% and discuss the total capital expenditure as a viable proportion of total expenditure.
T5.6.1.1
5.7 CAPITAL SPENDING ON 5 LARGEST PROJECTS
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 178
2007/08Actual Original
Budget (OB)Adjustment
BudgetActual Adjustment
to OB Variance (%)
Actual to OB Variance (%)
Source of financeExternal loans 3542 5500 5520 5511 0.36% 0.20%Public contributions and donations 248 300 390 421 30.00% 40.33%Grants and subsidies 3451 3700 3700 3856 0.00% 4.22%Other 2451 4500 4600 4565 2.22% 1.44%
Total 9692 14000 14210 14353 32.59% 46.19%Percentage of finance
External loans 36.5% 39.3% 38.8% 38.4% 1.1% 0.4%Public contributions and donations 2.6% 2.1% 2.7% 2.9% 92.1% 87.3%Grants and subsidies 35.6% 26.4% 26.0% 26.9% 0.0% 9.1%Other 25.3% 32.1% 32.4% 31.8% 6.8% 3.1%
Capital expenditureWater and sanitation 1845 4300 4250 4256 -1.16% -1.02%Electricity 1562 2400 2480 2453 3.33% 2.21%Housing 1243 2700 2800 2685 3.70% -0.56%Roads and storm water 1352 1500 1400 1486 -6.67% -0.93%Other 3690 3500 3450 3473 -1.43% -0.77%
Total 9692 14400 14380 14353 -2.22% -1.08%Percentage of expenditure
Water and sanitation 19.0% 29.9% 29.6% 29.7% 52.4% 95.2%Electricity 16.1% 16.7% 17.2% 17.1% -150.1% -205.4%Housing 12.8% 18.8% 19.5% 18.7% -166.8% 51.7%Roads and storm water 13.9% 10.4% 9.7% 10.4% 300.2% 86.8%Other 38.1% 24.3% 24.0% 24.2% 64.3% 71.7%
T5.6.1
Capital Expenditure - Funding Sources 2007/08 - 2008/09
2008/09
Details
R' 000
COMMENT ON CAPITAL PROJECTS:
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 179
Original Budget Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
Original Variance
(%)
Adjustment variance (%)
A - 26,000,000 26,500,000 25,700,000 1% -2%B - 19,500,000 19,750,000 19,900,000 -2% -1%C - 15,700,000 15,700,000 15,500,000 1% 0%D - 12,000,000 11,800,000 11,700,000 3% 2%E - 11,500,000 11,000,000 11,250,000 2% 4%
Capital Expenditure of 5 largest projects*
Name of Project
Current Year Variance Current YearR' 000
* Projects with the highest capital expenditure in 2008/09Name of Project - AObjective of ProjectDelaysFuture ChallengesAnticipated citizen benefits
Name of Project - BObjective of ProjectDelaysFuture ChallengesAnticipated citizen benefits
Name of Project - CObjective of ProjectDelaysFuture ChallengesAnticipated citizen benefits
Name of Project - DObjective of ProjectDelaysFuture ChallengesAnticipated citizen benefits
Name of Project - EObjective of ProjectDelaysFuture ChallengesAnticipated citizen benefits
T5.7.1
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Provide information in the template above on the 5 largest projects, ranked according to their approved budget provision 2008/09. Comment on the variance between the original and adjustment budgets and on availability of future Budget provision to operate the projects and lessons learnt in the year about capital project implementation on time to budget.
T5.7.1.1
5.8 BASIC SERVICE AND INFRASTRUCTURE BACKLOGS – OVERVIEW
INTRODUCTION TO BASIC SERVICE AND INFRASTRUCTURE BACKLOGS
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Explain that need and cost of backlogs are the result of migration into an area; migration out of an area; the trend towards disaggregation of families into more than one housing unit; and the cost of renewing and upgrading core infrastructure. Explain how this balance effects net demand in your municipality and how your municipality is responding to the challenges created. T5.8.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 180
No. HHs % HHs No. HHs % HHsWater % %Sanitation % %Electricity % %Waste management % %Housing % %
T5.8.2% HHs are the service above/below minimum starndard as a proportion of total HHs. 'Housing' refrs to * formal and ** informal settlements.
Service Backlogs as at 30 June 2009Households (HHs)
*Service level above minimun standard **Service level below minimun standard
COMMENT ON BACKLOGS:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Comment on how MIG grants have been utilised to redress the backlogs and on the variances in T 5.8.3. If appropriate, comment that Appendix P contains details of schools and clinics that have been established that do not have ready access to one or more basic services and Appendix Q contains details of those services provided by other spheres of government (whether the municipality is involved on an agency basis or not) that carry significant backlogs.
T5.8.4
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 181
Budget Adjust-ments
BudgetInfrastructure - Road transport % %
Roads, Pavements & Bridges % %Storm water % %
Infrastructure - Electricity % %Generation % %Transmission & Reticulation % %Street Lighting % %
Infrastructure - Water % %Dams & Reservoirs % %Water purification % %Reticulation % %
Infrastructure - Sanitation % %Reticulation % %Sewerage purification % %
Infrastructure - Other % %Waste Management % %Transportation % %Gas % %
Other Specify: % %% %% %% %
Total % %
T5.8.3
R' 000Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG)* Expenditure 2008/09 on Service backlogs
Major conditions applied by donor (continue below if necessary)
* MIG is a government grant program designed to fund a reduction in service backlogs, mainly: Water; Sanitation; Roads; Electricity. Expenditure on new, upgraded and renewed infrastructure is set out at Appendix M; note also the calculation of the variation. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between actual and original/adjustments budget by the actual.
Details
Budget Adjust-ments Budget
Actual Variance
COMPONENT C: CASH FLOW MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENTS
INTRODUCTION TO CASH FLOW MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENTS
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Give a brief comment on the importance of cash flow management. Refer to the scope of this activity as indicated in this component and what you regard as the key management features of your municipality’s approach. Refer to any other cash flow issues of current relevance to your municipality that are not adequately provided for in the format of this component.
T5.9.0
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 182
5.9 CASH FLOW
COMMENT ON CASH FLOW OUTCOMES:Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 183
2007/08
Audited Outcome Original Budget Adjusted Budget Actual
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts
Ratepayers and other
Government - operating
Government - capital
Interest
Dividends
Payments
Suppliers and employees
Finance charges
Transfers and Grants
NET CASH FROM/(USED) OPERATING ACTIVITIES – – – –
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Receipts
Proceeds on disposal of PPE
Decrease (Increase) in non-current debtors
Decrease (increase) other non-current receivables
Decrease (increase) in non-current investments
Payments
Capital assets
NET CASH FROM/(USED) INVESTING ACTIVITIES – – – –
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Receipts
Short term loans
Borrowing long term/refinancing
Increase (decrease) in consumer deposits
Payments
Repayment of borrowing
NET CASH FROM/(USED) FINANCING ACTIVITIES – – – –
NET INCREASE/ (DECREASE) IN CASH HELD – – – –
Cash/cash equivalents at the year begin: –
Cash/cash equivalents at the year end: – – –
Source: MBRR SA7 T5.9.1
Current Year 2008/09
Cash Flow OutcomesR'000
Description
Delete Directive note once comment is completed - Supply a brief summary about the cash flow status of the municipality. Explain variances from Original and Adjustment Budget to Actual. Include information on operating activities and what effect they had on cash flow and on cash backing of surpluses. Information regarding cash flow may be sourced from Table A7 of the MBRR.
T5.9.1.1
5.10 BORROWING AND INVESTMENTS
INTRODUCTION TO BORROWING AND INVESTMENTS
Delete Directive note once comment is completed – Explain briefly the relevance of borrowing and investments to you municipality with reference to the tables below and your municipality’s requirements in the year. Information may be sourced from table SA3 AND SA15 in the MBRR.
T5.10.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 184
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 185
Instrument 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09Municipality 1351 1342 1455
Long-Term Loans (annuity/reducing balance) 325 452 486Long-Term Loans (non-annuity)Local registered stockInstalment CreditFinancial LeasesPPP liabilitiesFinance Granted By Cap Equipment SupplierMarketable BondsNon-Marketable BondsBankers AcceptancesFinancial derivativesOther Securities
Municipality Total
Municipal EntitiesLong-Term Loans (annuity/reducing balance)Long-Term Loans (non-annuity)Local registered stockInstalment CreditFinancial LeasesPPP liabilitiesFinance Granted By Cap Equipment SupplierMarketable BondsNon-Marketable BondsBankers AcceptancesFinancial derivativesOther Securities
Entities TotalT5.10.2
Actual Borrowings 2005/06 - 2009/10R' 000
T5.10.3
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 186
R 0
R 50
R 100
R 150
R 200
R 250
R 300
R 350
R 400
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
R m
illio
nActual Borrowings
Municipality
Municipal Entities
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 187
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Actual Actual Actual
MunicipalitySecurities - National GovernmentListed Corporate BondsDeposits - BankDeposits - Public Investment CommissionersDeposits - Corporation for Public DepositsBankers Acceptance CertificatesNegotiable Certificates of Deposit - BanksGuaranteed Endowment Policies (sinking)Repurchase Agreements - BanksMunicipal BondsOther
Municipality sub-total 0 0 0
Municipal EntitiesSecurities - National GovernmentListed Corporate BondsDeposits - BankDeposits - Public Investment CommissionersDeposits - Corporation for Public DepositsBankers Acceptance CertificatesNegotiable Certificates of Deposit - BanksGuaranteed Endowment Policies (sinking)Repurchase Agreements - BanksOther
Entities sub-total 0 0 0
Consolidated total: 0 0 0T5.10.4
Municipal and Entity Investments
Investment* type
R' 000
COMMENT ON BORROWING AND INVESTMENTS:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Make clarifying comments on the above tables as necessary. All investments whether in the form of loans (in cash or kind) made by the municipality but not to one or more of the organisations set out above and all grants (in cash or kind) made to any form of organisation must be set out in full at Appendix R.
T5.10.5
5.11 PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Provide overview of agreements, contracts and projects undertaken during the year through PPP’s – Refer to further details of PPP details Appendix H. Table SA3 (MBRR) may also be used to gain information on PPP’s.
T5.11.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 188
COMPONENT D: OTHER FINANCIAL MATTERS
5.12 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Provide a brief narrative that describes the progress made by your municipality in developing and implementing policies and practices in compliance with the guidelines set down by the SCM Regulations 2005. State whether any councilors are members of any committee handling Supply Chain processes; state the number of Supply Chain officials that have reached the prescribed levels required for their positions (See MFMA Competency Regulation Guidelines) and state the number of prescribed officials that are yet to reach the necessary competency levels; and set out any remarks made in the previous Auditor-General’s report or his report for 2008/09 concerning the quality of Supply Chain Management and detail the remedial action taken, as necessary.
T5.12.1
5.13 GRAP COMPLIANCE
GRAP COMPLIANCEGRAP is the acronym for Generally Recognized Accounting Practice and it provides the rules by which municipalities are required to maintain their financial accounts. Successful GRAP compliance will ensure that municipal accounts are comparable and more informative for the municipality. It will also ensure that the municipality is more accountable to its citizens and other stakeholders. Information on GRAP compliance is needed to enable National Treasury to assess the pace of progress and consider the implications.
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed – Follow the above with information on progress with GRAP compliance at your municipality. Detail any instances where the municipality has deviated from the GRAP standards currently applicable.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 189
T5.13.1
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 190
CHAPTER 6 – AUDITOR GENERAL AUDIT FINDINGS
INTRODUCTION
Note: The Constitution S188 (1) (b) states that the functions of the Auditor-General includes the auditing and reporting on the accounts, financial statements and financial management of all municipalities. MSA S45 states that the results of performance measurement… must be audited annually by the Auditor-GeneralDelete Directive note once comment’s completed - Refer to the Annual Financial Statements set out in Volume II and the timescale for the audit of these accounts and the audit of performance and the production of reports on these matters by the Auditor General as set out in this Chapter. If this is the version of the annual report presented to Council in September then the Auditor-Generals statements on this year’s submissions will not be available for inclusion in this Chapter and this should be explained
T6.0.1
COMPONENT A: AUDITOR-GENERAL OPINION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2007/08
6.1 AUDITOR GENERAL REPORTS 2007/08
COMPONENT B: AUDITOR-GENERAL OPINION 2008/09
6.2 AUDITOR GENERAL REPORT 2008/09
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 192
Audit Report Status*:
Non-Compliance Issues Remedial Action Taken
T6.1.1
Auditor-General Report on Financial Performance 2007/08
Note:*The report's status is supplied by the Auditor General and ranges from unqualified (at best); to unqualified with other matters specified; qualified; adverse; and disclaimed (at worse)
Audit Report Status:
Non-Compliance Issues Remedial Action Taken
T6.1.2
Auditor-General Report on Service Delivery Performance 2007/08
AUDITOR GENERAL REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2008/09
Delete Directive note once comment is complete - Attach reportT6.2.3
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 193
Status of audit report:
Non-Compliance Issues Remedial Action Taken
T6.2.1
Auditor-General Report on Financial Performance 2008/09*
Note:* The report's status is supplied by the Auditor General and ranges from unqualified (at best); to unqualified with other matters specified; qualified; adverse; and disclaimed (at worse). This table will be completed prior to the publication of the Annual report but following the receipt of the Auditor- General Report on Financial Performance 2008/09.
Status of audit report**:
Non-Compliance Issues Remedial Action Taken
T6.2.2
Auditor-General Report on Service Delivery Performance 2008/09*
* This table will be completed prior to the publication of the Annual report but following the receipt of the Auditor- General Report on Service Delivery Performance 2008/09** Inclusion of "Status" depends on nature of AG's remarks on Performance Data.
COMMENTS ON AUDITOR-GENERAL’S OPINION 2008/09:
Delete Directive note once comment’s completed - Provide comments from the Municipal Manager / CFO on the Auditor-General’s opinion. Include comments on 2007/08 if it provides useful context.
T6.2.4
COMMENTS ON MFMA SECTION 71 RESPONSIBILITIES: Section 71 of the MFMA requires municipalities to return a series of financial performance data to the National Treasury at specified intervals throughout the year. The Chief financial officer states that these data sets have been returned according to the reporting requirements/ with the exception of those items and for those reasons given at Appendix S (delete ‘/…’ if not applicable).Signed (Chief financial Officer)………………………………………………………..... Dated T6.2.5
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 194
GLOSSARY
Accessibility indicators
Explore whether the intended beneficiaries are able to access services or outputs.
Accountability documents
Documents used by executive authorities to give “full and regular” reports on the matters under their control to Parliament and provincial legislatures as prescribed by the Constitution. This includes plans, budgets, in-year and Annual Reports.
Activities The processes or actions that use a range of inputs to produce the desired outputs and ultimately outcomes. In essence, activities describe "what we do".
Adequacy indicators
The quantity of input or output relative to the need or demand.
Annual Report A report to be prepared and submitted annually based on the regulations set out in Section 121 of the Municipal Finance Management Act. Such a report must include annual financial statements as submitted to and approved by the Auditor-General.
Approved Budget
The annual financial statements of a municipality as audited by the Auditor General and approved by council or a provincial or national executive.
Baseline Current level of performance that a municipality aims to improve when setting performance targets. The baseline relates to the level of performance recorded in a year prior to the planning period.
Basic municipal service
A municipal service that is necessary to ensure an acceptable and reasonable quality of life to citizens within that particular area. If not provided it may endanger the public health and safety or the environment.
Budget year The financial year for which an annual budget is to be
approved – means a year ending on 30 June.
Cost indicators
The overall cost or expenditure of producing a specified quantity of outputs.
Distribution indicators
The distribution of capacity to deliver services.
Financial Statements
Includes at least a statement of financial position, statement of financial performance, cash-flow statement, notes to these statements and any other statements that may be prescribed.
General Key performance indicators
After consultation with MECs for local government, the Minister may prescribe general key performance indicators that are appropriate and applicable to local government generally.
Impact The results of achieving specific outcomes, such as reducing poverty and creating jobs.
Inputs All the resources that contribute to the production and delivery of outputs. Inputs are "what we use to do the work". They include finances, personnel, equipment and buildings.
Integrated Development Plan (IDP)
Set out municipal goals and development plans.
National Key performance areas
• Service delivery & infrastructure• Economic development• Municipal transformation and institutional
development• Financial viability and management• Good governance and community
participation
Outcomes The medium-term results for specific beneficiaries that are the consequence of achieving specific outputs. Outcomes should relate clearly to an institution's strategic goals and objectives set out in its plans.
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 196
Outcomes are "what we wish to achieve".
Outputs The final products, or goods and services produced for delivery. Outputs may be defined as "what we produce or deliver". An output is a concrete achievement (i.e. a product such as a passport, an action such as a presentation or immunization, or a service such as processing an application) that contributes to the achievement of a Key Result Area.
Performance Indicator
Indicators should be specified to measure performance in relation to input, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts. An indicator is a type of information used to gauge the extent towhich an output has been achieved (policy developed, presentation delivered, service rendered)
Performance Information
Generic term for non-financial information about municipal services and activities. Can also be used interchangeably with performance measure.
Performance Standards:
The minimum acceptable level of performance or the level of performance that is generally accepted. Standards are informed by legislative requirements and service-level agreements. Performance standards are mutually agreed criteria to describe how well work must be done in terms of quantity and/or quality and timeliness, to clarify the outputs and related activities of a job by describing what the required result should be. In this EPMDS performance standards are divided into indicators and the time factor.
Performance Targets: The level of performance that municipalities and its employees strive to achieve. Performance Targets relate to current baselines and express a specific level of performance that a municipality aims to achieve within a given time period.
Service Delivery Budget Implementation Plan
Detailed plan approved by the mayor for implementing the municipality’s delivery of services; including projections of the revenue collected and operational and capital expenditure by vote for each month. Service delivery targets and performance indicators must also be included.
Vote: One of the main segments into which a budget of a municipality is divided for appropriation of money for the different departments or functional areas
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 197
of the municipality. The Vote specifies the total amount that is appropriated for the purpose of a specific department or functional area.Section 1 of the MFMA defines a “vote” as:a) one of the main segments into which a budget of a municipality is divided for the appropriation of money for the different departments or functional areas of the municipality; andb) which specifies the total amount that is appropriated for the purposes of the department or functional area concerned
Hantam Municipality Annual Report 2013/2014 198
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – COUNCILLORS; COMMITTEE ALLOCATION AND COUNCIL ATTENDANCE
CONCERNING TA
A spreadsheet exists to compile attendance data
Delete Directive note before publication
TA.1
Municipality | APPENDICES 199
Full Time / Part Time
FT/PT % %
T A
Councillors, Committees Allocated and Council AttendanceCommittees Allocated *Ward and/ or Party
RepresentedCouncil Members
Note: * Councillors appointed on a proportional basis do not have wards allocated to them
Percentage Council
Meetings Attendance
Percentage Apologies for non-
attendance
APPENDIX B – COMMITTEES AND COMMITTEE PURPOSES
Municipality | APPENDICES 200
Municipal Committees
T B
Committees (other than Mayoral / Executive Committee) and Purposes of CommitteesPurpose of Committee
APPENDIX C –THIRD TIER ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
Municipality | APPENDICES 201
Directorate Director/Manager (State title and name)
Use as a spill-over schedule if top 3 tiers cannot be accomodated in chapter 2 (T2.2.2).
T C
Third Tier Structure
APPENDIX D – FUNCTIONS OF MUNICIPALITY / ENTITY
Municipality | APPENDICES 202
MUNICIPAL FUNCTIONS Function Applicable to Municipality (Yes / No)*
Function Applicable to Entity
(Yes / No)Constitution Schedule 4, Part B functions:
Air pollutionBuilding regulationsChild care facilitiesElectricity and gas reticulationFirefighting servicesLocal tourismMunicipal airportsMunicipal planningMunicipal health servicesMunicipal public transportMunicipal public works only in respect of the needs of municipalities in the discharge of their responsibilities to administer functions specifically assigned to them under this Constitution or any other Pontoons, ferries, jetties, piers and harbours, excluding the regulation of international and national shipping and matters related Stormwater management systems in built-up areasTrading regulationsWater and sanitation services limited to potable water supply systems and domestic waste-water and sewage disposal systems
Municipal / Entity Functions
Continued next page
APPENDIX E – WARD REPORTING
Municipality | APPENDICES 203
MUNICIPAL FUNCTIONS Function Applicable to Municipality (Yes / No)*
Function Applicable to Entity
(Yes / No)Constitution Schedule 5, Part B functions:
Beaches and amusement facilitiesBillboards and the display of advertisements in public places
Cemeteries, funeral parlours and crematoriaCleansingControl of public nuisancesControl of undertakings that sell liquor to the publicFacilities for the accommodation, care and burial of animalsFencing and fencesLicensing of dogsLicensing and control of undertakings that sell food to the public
Local amenitiesLocal sport facilitiesMarketsMunicipal abattoirsMunicipal parks and recreationMunicipal roadsNoise pollutionPoundsPublic placesRefuse removal, refuse dumps and solid waste disposalStreet tradingStreet lightingTraffic and parking
T D
Municipal / Entity Functions
* If municipality: indicate (yes or No); * If entity: Provide name of entity
Continued from previous page
Municipality | APPENDICES 204
Ward Name (Number) Name of Ward Councillor and elected Ward committee
members
Committee established (Yes / No)
Number of monthly
Committee meetings held
during the year
Number of monthly reports
submitted to Speakers Office
on time
Number of quarterly public ward meetings
held during year
T E
Functionality of Ward Committees
APPENDIX F – WARD INFORMATION
Change Annexure X to Annexure N on the table heading.
ELECTED WARD MEMBERS (STATING NUMBER OF MEETING ATTENDED – MAXIMUM 12 MEETINGS)
Names: xxx (8); xxx (7)…
T F.3
Municipality | APPENDICES 205
R' 000No. Project Name and detail Start Date End Date Total Value
Ward Title: Ward Name (Number)
Capital Projects: Seven Largest in 2008/09 (Full List at Appendix N)
T F.1
Detail Water Sanitation Electricity Refuse HousingHouseholds with minimum service deliveryHouseholds without minimum service deliveryTotal Households*Houses completed in yearShortfall in Housing units
T F.2
Basic Service Provision
*Including informal settlements
No. Priority Name and Detail Progress During 2008/09Top Four Service Delivery Priorities for Ward (Highest Priority First)
T F.3
APPENDIX G – RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL AUDIT COMMITTEE 2008/09
APPENDIX H – LONG TERM CONTRACTS AND PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
Municipality | APPENDICES 206
Date of Committee
Committee recommendations during 2008/09
Recommendations adopted (enter Yes); not adopted (provide explanation)
T G
Municipal Audit Committee Recommendations
Municipality | APPENDICES 207
Name of Service Provider (Entity or Municipal
Department)
Description of Services Rendered by the Service Provider
Start Date of Contract
Expiry date of Contract
Project manager Contract Value
T H.1
Long Term Contracts (20 Largest Contracts Entered into 2008/09)R' 000
R' 000Name and Description of
ProjectName of Partner(s) Initiation
Date Expiry date Project manager Value
2008/09
T H.2
Public Private Partnerships Entered into 2008/09
APPENDIX I – MUNICIPAL ENTITY/ SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
Insert table note advising municipalities to include scorecards.
Municipality | APPENDICES
Name of Entity & Purpose (a) Service Indicators 2009/10Target Actual Actual
*Previous Year
*Previous Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Current Year
*Following Year
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
T I
Note: This statement should include no more than the top four priority indicators. * 'Previous Year' refers to the targets that were set in the 2007/08 Budget/IDP round; *'Current Year' refers to the targets set in the 2008/09 Budget/IDP round. *'Following Year' refers to the targets set in the 2009/10 Budget/IDP round. Note that all targets must be fundable within approved budget provision. In column (ii) set out the Service Indicator (In bold italics) then the Service Target underneath (not in bold - standard type face) to denote the difference.
(b) Service Targets
Municipal Entity/Service Provider Performance Schedule2007/08 2008/09 2012/13
Target Target
APPENDIX J – DISCLOSURES OF FINANCIAL INTERESTS
Municipality | APPENDICES
Position Name Description of Financial interests*(Nil / Or details)
(Executive) Mayor
Member of MayCo / Exco
Councillor
Municipal Manager
Chief Financial Officer
Deputy MM and (Executive) Directors
Other S57 Officials
Period 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009Disclosures of Financial Interests
* Financial intersests to be disclosed even if they incurred for only part of the year. See MBRR SA34A T J
APPENDIX K: REVENUE COLLECTION PERFORMANCE BY VOTE AND BY SOURCE
APPENDIX K (I): REVENUE COLLECTION PERFORMANCE BY VOTE
Municipality | APPENDICES 210
R' 0002007/08Actual Original Budget Adjusted
BudgetActual Original Budget Adjustments
BudgetExample 1 - Vote 1Example 2 - Vote 2Example 3 - Vote 3Example 4 - Vote 4Example 5 - Vote 5Example 6 - Vote 6Example 7 - Vote 7Example 8 - Vote 8Example 9 - Vote 9Example 10 - Vote 10Example 11 - Vote 11Example 12 - Vote 12Example 13 - Vote 13Example 14 - Vote 14Example 15 - Vote 15
Total Revenue by Vote – – – – – –
T K.1
Revenue Collection Performance by Vote
Current Year 2008/09 2008/09 VarianceVote Description
Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between actual and original/adjustments budget by the actual. This table is aligned to MBRR table A3
APPENDIX K (II): REVENUE COLLECTION PERFORMANCE BY SOURCE
Municipality | APPENDICES 211
200708Actual Original Budget Adjustments
BudgetActual Original Budget Adjustments
Budget
Property rates 26,485 23,572 28,075 23,042 -2.30% -21.84%
Property rates - penalties & collection charges 8,541 8,285 9,054 8,456 2.02% -7.07%
Service Charges - electricity revenue 12,355 10,254 12,478 13,219 22.43% 5.61%
Service Charges - water revenue 14,232 13,235 13,662 12,097 -9.41% -12.94%
Service Charges - sanitation revenue 6,542 5,496 5,954 6,346 13.40% 6.19%
Service Charges - refuse revenue 1,865 1,622 1,865 1,510 -7.41% -23.46%
Service Charges - other 5,643 5,530 5,925 5,304 -4.26% -11.70%
Rentals of facilities and equipment 5,643 5,530 5,925 5,304 -4.26% -11.70%
Interest earned - external investments 5,322 4,470 5,747 4,630 3.45% -24.14%
Interest earned - outstanding debtors 8,455 8,455 8,624 9,554 11.50% 9.73%
Dividends received 1,254 1,003 1,191 1,354 25.93% 12.04%
Fines 2,516 2,063 2,264 2,340 11.83% 3.23%
Licences and permits 6,846 6,230 7,256 6,640 6.19% -9.28%
Agency services 12,546 10,413 11,793 11,542 9.78% -2.17%
Transfers recognised - operational 2,355 2,190 2,425 2,402 8.82% -0.98%
Other revenue 48,542 40,776 48,542 46,115 11.58% -5.26%
Gains on disposal of PPE 4,565 3,698 4,337 4,291 13.83% -1.06%
Enviromental Proctection 5,649 4,971 6,157 4,971 0.00% -23.86%Total Revenue (excluding capital transfers and contributions)
179,353 157,791 181,274 169,118 6.70% -7.19%
T K.2Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between actual and original/adjustments budget by the actual. This table is aligned to MBRR table A4.
Revenue Collection Performance by SourceR '000
Description2008/09 2008/09 Variance
APPENDIX L: CONDITIONAL GRANTS RECEIVED: EXCLUDING MIG
COMMENT ON CONDITIONAL GRANTS EXCLUDING MIG:
Delete Directive note once comment is complete – Use this box to provide additional information on grant benefits or conditions and reasons for acceptance.
TL.1
Municipality | APPENDICES 212
Budget Adjust-ments
BudgetNeighbourhood Development Partnership Grant % %
% %% %
Public Transport Infrastructure and Systems Grant % %
% %% %% %
Other Specify: % %% %% %% %
Total % %
T L
* This includes Neighbourhood Development Partnership Grant, Public Transport Infrastructure and Systems Grant and any other grant excluding Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) which is dealt with in the main report, see T5.8.3. Variances are calculated by dividing the difference between actual and original/adjustments budget by the actual.
Conditional Grants: excluding MIGR' 000
Details
Budget Adjust-ments Budget
Actual Variance Major conditions applied by donor (continue below if necessary)
APPENDIX M: CAPITAL EXPENDITURE – NEW & UPGRADE/RENEWAL PROGRAMMES
APPENDIX M (I): CAPITAL EXPENDITURE - NEW ASSETS PROGRAMME
Municipality | APPENDICES 213
2007/08
Actual Original Budget
Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
FY + 1 FY + 2 FY + 3
Capital expenditure by Asset ClassInfrastructure - Total – – – – – –
Infrastructure: Road transport - Total – – – – – – Roads, Pavements & BridgesStorm water
Infrastructure: Electricity - Total – – – – – – GenerationTransmission & ReticulationStreet Lighting
Infrastructure: Water - Total – – – – – – Dams & ReservoirsWater purificationReticulation
Infrastructure: Sanitation - Total – – – – – – ReticulationSewerage purification
Infrastructure: Other - Total – – – – – – Waste ManagementTransportationGasOther
Community - Total – – – – – – Parks & gardensSportsfields & stadiaSwimming poolsCommunity hallsLibrariesRecreational facilitiesFire, safety & emergencySecurity and policingBusesClinicsMuseums & Art GalleriesCemeteriesSocial rental housingOther
Table continued next page
2008/09 Planned Capital expenditure
Capital Expenditure - New Assets Programme*
DescriptionR '000
Municipality | APPENDICES 214
Table continued from previous page
2007/08
Actual Original Budget
Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
FY + 1 FY + 2 FY + 3
Capital expenditure by Asset ClassHeritage assets - Total – – – – – –
BuildingsOther
Investment properties - Total – – – – – – Housing developmentOther
Other assets – – – – – – General vehiclesSpecialised vehiclesPlant & equipmentComputers - hardware/equipmentFurniture and other office equipmentAbattoirsMarketsCivic Land and BuildingsOther BuildingsOther LandSurplus Assets - (Investment or Inventory)Other
Agricultural assets – – – – – – List sub-class
Biological assets – – – – – – List sub-class
Intangibles – – – – – – Computers - software & programmingOther (list sub-class)
Total Capital Expenditure on new assets #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
Specialised vehicles – – – – – – RefuseFireConservancyAmbulances
* Note: Information for this table may be sourced from MBRR (2009: Table SA34a) T M.1
Capital Expenditure - New Assets Programme*
2008/09 Planned Capital expenditureDescriptionR '000
APPENDIX M (II): CAPITAL EXPENDITURE – UPGRADE/RENEWAL PROGRAMME
Municipality | APPENDICES 215
2007/08
Actual Original Budget
Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
FY + 1 FY + 2 FY + 3
Capital expenditure by Asset ClassInfrastructure - Total – – – – – –
Infrastructure: Road transport -Total – – – – – – Roads, Pavements & BridgesStorm water
Infrastructure: Electricity - Total – – – – – – GenerationTransmission & ReticulationStreet Lighting
Infrastructure: Water - Total – – – – – – Dams & ReservoirsWater purificationReticulation
Infrastructure: Sanitation - Total – – – – – – ReticulationSewerage purification
Infrastructure: Other - Total – – – – – – Waste ManagementTransportationGasOther
Community – – – – – – Parks & gardensSportsfields & stadiaSwimming poolsCommunity hallsLibrariesRecreational facilitiesFire, safety & emergencySecurity and policingBusesClinicsMuseums & Art GalleriesCemeteriesSocial rental housingOther
Heritage assets – – – – – – BuildingsOther
Table continued next page
Capital Expenditure - Upgrade/Renewal Programme*
2008/09 Planned Capital expenditureDescription
R '000
Municipality | APPENDICES 216
Table continued from previous page
2007/08
Actual Original Budget
Adjustment Budget
Actual Expenditure
FY + 1 FY + 2 FY + 3
Capital expenditure by Asset ClassInvestment properties – – – – – –
Housing developmentOther
Other assets – – – – – – General vehiclesSpecialised vehiclesPlant & equipmentComputers - hardware/equipmentFurniture and other office equipmentAbattoirsMarketsCivic Land and BuildingsOther BuildingsOther LandSurplus Assets - (Investment or Inventory)Other
Agricultural assets – – – – – – List sub-class
Biological assets – – – – – – List sub-class
Intangibles – – – – – – Computers - software & programmingOther (list sub-class)
Total Capital Expenditure on renewal of existing assets – – – – – –
Specialised vehicles – – – – – – RefuseFireConservancyAmbulances
* Note: Information for this table may be sourced from MBRR (2009: Table SA34b) T M.2
Capital Expenditure - Upgrade/Renewal Programme*
2008/09 Planned Capital expenditureDescription
R '000
APPENDIX N – CAPITAL PROGRAMME BY PROJECT 2008/09
Municipality | APPENDICES 217
Capital Project Original Budget
Adjustment Budget
Actual Variance (Act - Adj)
%
Variance (Act - OB)
%
Water"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project C" 85 90 95 5% 11%Sanitation/Sewerage"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Electricity"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Housing"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Refuse removal "Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Stormwater "Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Economic development"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Sports, Arts & Culture"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Environment"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Health"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%Safety and Security"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%ICT and Other"Project A" 82 85 92 8% 11%"Project B" 85 90 95 5% 11%
Capital Programme by Project 2008/09
T N
R' 000
APPENDIX O – CAPITAL PROGRAMME BY PROJECT BY WARD 2008/09
Municipality | APPENDICES 218
Capital Project Ward(s) affected Works completed (Yes/No)
Water"Project A""Project B"
Sanitation/Sewerage
Electricity
Housing
Refuse removal
Stormwater
Economic development
Sports, Arts & Culture
Environment
Health
Safety and Security
ICT and Other
Capital Programme by Project by Ward 2008/09*
T O
R' 000
APPENDIX P – SERVICE CONNECTION BACKLOGS AT SCHOOLS AND CLINICS
Municipality | APPENDICES 219
Establishments lacking basic services Water Sanitation Electricity Solid Waste Collection
Schools (NAMES, LOCATIONS)
Clinics (NAMES, LOCATIONS)
T P
Service Backlogs: Schools and Clinics
Names and locations of schools and clinics lacking one or more services. Use 'x' to mark lack of service at appropriate level for the number of people attending the school/clinic, allowing for the proper functioning of the establishment concerned.
APPENDIX Q – SERVICE BACKLOGS EXPERIENCED BY THE COMMUNITY WHERE ANOTHER SPHERE OF GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SERVICE PROVISION
Municipality | APPENDICES 220
Services and Locations Scale of backlogs Impact of backlogs
Clinics:
Housing:
Licencing and Testing Centre:
Reseviors
Schools (Primary and High):
Sports Fields:
T Q
Service Backlogs Experienced by the Commmunity where another Sphere of Government is the Service Provider (where the municipality whether or not act on agency basis)
APPENDIX R – DECLARATION OF LOANS AND GRANTS MADE BY THE MUNICIPALITY
Municipality | APPENDICES 221
APPENDIX S – DECLARATION OF RETURNS NOT MADE IN DUE TIME UNDER MFMA S71
CONCERNING TS
Delete this Appendix if all returns have been made in accordance with reporting requirements.
Delete Directive note before publicationMunicipality | APPENDICES 222
All Organisation or Person in receipt of Loans */Grants*
provided by the municipality
Nature of project Conditions attached to funding
Value 2008/09
R' 000
Total Amount committed over
previous and future years
T R
Declaration of Loans and Grants made by the municipality 2008/09
* Loans/Grants - whether in cash or in kind
Return Reason Return has not been properly made on due dateMFMA Section 71 Returns Not Made During 2008/09 According to Reporting Requirements
T S
TS.1
APPENDIX T – PRESEDENTIAL OUTCOME FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Municipality | APPENDICES 223
Outcome/Output Progress to date Number or Percentage Achieved
Output: Improving access to basic services
Output: Implementation of the Community Work Programme
Output: Deepen democracy through a refined Ward Committee model
Output: Administrative and financial capability
Presidential Outcome for Local Government
* Note: Some of the outputs deta i led on this table might have been reported for in other chapters , the information thereof should correspond with previous ly reported informa tion.
T T
VOLUME II: ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTSProvide the audited Annual Financial Statements to the Annual report for 2008/09 – This to be developed as a separate volume. Refer to MFMA Circular 36 for further guidance.
T V2
Municipality | APPENDICES