anomalous behavior of solid helium under inhomogeneous conditions b. verkin institute for low...
Post on 18-Dec-2015
222 views
TRANSCRIPT
Anomalous Behavior of Solid Anomalous Behavior of Solid Helium Under Inhomogeneous Helium Under Inhomogeneous
Conditions Conditions
B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physicsand Engineering of the National Academy of
Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkov
E.Rudavskii
OutlineOutline Observation of a disordered (glassy) Observation of a disordered (glassy)
phase in solid phase in solid 44He in the supersolidity He in the supersolidity regionregion
Anomalous fast mass transfer in solid Anomalous fast mass transfer in solid 33He-He-44He mixturesHe mixtures
Formation of liquid droplets during Formation of liquid droplets during the BCC-HCP transition in solid heliumthe BCC-HCP transition in solid helium
Thermodynamic measurements in solid Thermodynamic measurements in solid 44HeHe
Two effects are expected: - Two effects are expected: - Anomaly associated with the transition (“Lambda”?)Anomaly associated with the transition (“Lambda”?) - Change in the temperature dependencies C(T), P(T)- Change in the temperature dependencies C(T), P(T)
Specific Heat MeasurementsSpecific Heat Measurements
- 1952- F.J.Webb et al, T=0.6-1.4 K, V=18.3-20.6 cm1952- F.J.Webb et al, T=0.6-1.4 K, V=18.3-20.6 cm33/mole/mole;;- 1962- E.C.Heltems,C.A.Swenson,T=0.3-2 K, V=12,8-19.6 - 1962- E.C.Heltems,C.A.Swenson,T=0.3-2 K, V=12,8-19.6 cmcm33/mole;/mole;- 1964- J.P.Frank, - 1964- J.P.Frank, T=1.3-4 K, V=10,8-16.3cmT=1.3-4 K, V=10,8-16.3cm33/mole;/mole; - 1965- D.O.Edwards, R.C.Pandorf, - 1965- D.O.Edwards, R.C.Pandorf, T=0.1- 4 K, T=0.1- 4 K, V=16.9-20.9cmV=16.9-20.9cm33/mole/mole;;..- 1966- G.Alhers, - 1966- G.Alhers, T=1.38-2.7 K, V=13.73-15.1cmT=1.38-2.7 K, V=13.73-15.1cm33/mole;/mole;- 1970- W.R.Gardner et al, - 1970- W.R.Gardner et al, T=0.35-1.8 K, V=20.45-20.96cmT=0.35-1.8 K, V=20.45-20.96cm33/mole/mole;;- 1975- S.Castles, E.D.Adams, - 1975- S.Castles, E.D.Adams, T=0.025-TT=0.025-Tmeltmelt, V=19.4-20.5cm, V=19.4-20.5cm33/mole;/mole;- 2005- A.C.Clark, M.Chan, 2005- A.C.Clark, M.Chan, T=0.08-0.3 K, P=39-50 bar; T=0.08-0.3 K, P=39-50 bar; (This data was analyzed by A.Balatsky et al (2006)(This data was analyzed by A.Balatsky et al (2006) .Recent works (2007) – X.Lin, A.Clark, and M.H.W.Chan, T=0.04-0.5 K. - H.Maris and S.Balibar, (analysis of phonon contribution).
ResultsResults
- A broad specific heat peak was observed near 75 mK- A broad specific heat peak was observed near 75 mK- No reliable indication of linear contribution to heat capacity- No reliable indication of linear contribution to heat capacity
Pressure measurementsPressure measurements
1990 - E.Adams, M.Meisel (Univ.Florida) T1990 - E.Adams, M.Meisel (Univ.Florida) Tminmin=1mK, P=26 bar.=1mK, P=26 bar.
1991 - P.van de Haar, C.van Woerkeus, M.Meisel, R.Jochemsen, G.Frossati (Univ.Leiden) T=1.5 – 1991 - P.van de Haar, C.van Woerkeus, M.Meisel, R.Jochemsen, G.Frossati (Univ.Leiden) T=1.5 – 120 mK, P=26 bar, melting curve120 mK, P=26 bar, melting curve
2006-2007 - I.Todoshchenko, H.Alles, J.Bueno, H.Junes, A.Parshin, V.Tsepelin (Helsinki Univ.) T= 2006-2007 - I.Todoshchenko, H.Alles, J.Bueno, H.Junes, A.Parshin, V.Tsepelin (Helsinki Univ.) T= 80-400 mK, melting curve80-400 mK, melting curve
No indication of anomalous behaviorNo indication of anomalous behavior
;
i
ii
V V
C
T
P
2007 - New experiment2007 - New experiment::
V.Grigor’ev, V.Maidanov, V.Rubanskii, S.Rubets, V.Grigor’ev, V.Maidanov, V.Rubanskii, S.Rubets, E.Rudavskii. A.Rybalko, Ye.Syrnikov, V.TikhiiE.Rudavskii. A.Rybalko, Ye.Syrnikov, V.Tikhii, , Verkin Verkin Institute Low Temp.Phys., KharkovInstitute Low Temp.Phys., Kharkov
The main objective:The main objective:
Searching for glassy phase of Searching for glassy phase of 44He in the supersolidity He in the supersolidity regionregion through precise barometry in the crystals of through precise barometry in the crystals of various qualityvarious quality
);()()()( TPTPTPPTP otherphvaco
Mei-Gruneisen equationMei-Gruneisen equation::
Advantages:Advantages:-There is no contribution equivalent to that -There is no contribution equivalent to that of an empty calorimeterof an empty calorimeterHigh-precision pressure measurements in High-precision pressure measurements in solid 4He (~10solid 4He (~10-5-5 bar) bar)
The relation between pressure and specific heat:The relation between pressure and specific heat:
Experimental cellExperimental cell
Cell: Ø9mm, h=1.5mm. Thermal relaxation time 30 s at T=100mK .Accuracy of pressure measurements ~10-5 bar.
23 crystals; T= 40 mK- Tmelt; P=26-43 bar.
Experimental conditionsExperimental conditions
0,01 K
0,7 K
1 K
He4
He4
Pumping
N2
4,2 K
He4
ProcedureProcedure
- - Crystallization of the sample (capillary blocking technique)Crystallization of the sample (capillary blocking technique)- - Fast cooling at a maximum possible rate down to ~1 K- Fast cooling at a maximum possible rate down to ~1 K- - Step-like cooling to temperatures below 100 mK- Step-like cooling to temperatures below 100 mK- - Isothermal ageing for several hours at a minimum temperature- Isothermal ageing for several hours at a minimum temperature- - Heating the sample in a step-like manner- Heating the sample in a step-like manner- - Annealing the sample near the melting point- Annealing the sample near the melting point- - Repeating the above procedure- Repeating the above procedure
Typical temperature dependence of Typical temperature dependence of pressurepressure
(High temperatures)(High temperatures)
0 2 4 6 8 10
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
Pvac
Pph
P-P
0,ba
r
T4,K4
1,190 1,41 1,57 1,68 T,K
Pexp
((Ye.Vekhov, V.Grigor’ev et al, 2007Ye.Vekhov, V.Grigor’ev et al, 2007))
P(T) – PP(T) – Po o = P= Pvacvac(T) + P(T) + Pphph(T)(T)PP00 is pressure at T=0 is pressure at T=0
Phonon contributionPhonon contribution::
;5
3)(
3
44
Dph
TR
VTP
);exp()31()()( 3
T
QR
VQ
T
Q
TTP VQ
VVvac
Vacancy contribution Vacancy contribution (J.Hetherington,1978(J.Hetherington,1978):):
The molar volume dependence of The molar volume dependence of vacancy activation energy and Debye vacancy activation energy and Debye
temperaturetemperature
14 16 18 20 22 24
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
20
30
b)
D,K
V, cm3/mol
a)
QV,K
Universal molar Universal molar volume dependence of volume dependence of QQvv and and
for for 44He, He, 33He-He-44He He mixtures and BCC mixtures and BCC 33He He at the constant values at the constant values of the Gruneisen of the Gruneisen parameters.parameters.
For For 33He-He-44He mixtures the He mixtures the valuesvalues
of Debye temperature wereof Debye temperature were
obtained for the first timeobtained for the first time
D
Typical temperature dependence of Typical temperature dependence of pressurepressure
(Low temperatures )(Low temperatures )
0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5
0,0000
0,0005
0,0010
0,0015
0,0020
0,0025
P-P
0,b
ar
T, K
Pexp
Pglass
Pph
At T<0.5 K:At T<0.5 K:
PPexpexp(T) – P(T) – P00= P= Pphph + + PPgg
PPphph = a = aphph T T44
PPgg = a = agg T T22
Finding the parameters Finding the parameters a agg and and aaphph
(P(Pexpexp – P – P00) / T) / T22 = =
= a= agg + a + aphphTT22;;
До отжига
For 23 samples studied: aFor 23 samples studied: ag g = (1.5 – 4)10= (1.5 – 4)10-3-3 bar/Kbar/K22
Annealing and RelaxationAnnealing and Relaxation
55 typical regimestypical regimes:: 1- an initial state;1- an initial state; 2- a large increase in T2- a large increase in T
and a small increase in P;and a small increase in P; 3 – a dramatic drop in 3 – a dramatic drop in
pressure;pressure; 4 – a slow relaxation of 4 – a slow relaxation of
pressure;pressure; 5 – a new equilibrium state: 5 – a new equilibrium state:
T returns to its initial value T returns to its initial value andand aa huge difference in huge difference in pressure (~2 bar).pressure (~2 bar).
0,01 0,1 1 100
500
1000
1500
2000
T, m
K
t, hour
1 2 3 4
a
b
5
41
42
43
44
P,
bar
Metastable liquid/glass drops,Metastable liquid/glass drops,traped in ‘pockets’ during fast traped in ‘pockets’ during fast crystallization.crystallization.Amount of liquid necessary to Amount of liquid necessary to explain the effect is ~5%explain the effect is ~5%
Annealing influenceAnnealing influence
0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 0,20 0,25 0,30 0,35
0,000
0,002
0,004
0,006
0,008
0,010
0,012
(P-P
0)/T
2 , bar
/K2
T2, К2
before
after annealing
Before annealingBefore annealing
aagg= 2.7 mbar/K= 2.7 mbar/K22
After annealingAfter annealing
aagg < 0.1 mbar/K < 0.1 mbar/K22
The glassy contribution to the pressure can be The glassy contribution to the pressure can be eliminated in well-annealed crystalseliminated in well-annealed crystals
Conclusion 1Conclusion 1
The TThe T2 2 contribution to the pressure is contribution to the pressure is observed in the supersolid region. It observed in the supersolid region. It can be attributed to formation of the can be attributed to formation of the glassy phase.glassy phase.
In well-annealed crystals the glassy In well-annealed crystals the glassy contribution can be eliminated.contribution can be eliminated.
A dramatic pressure decrease (~ 2 A dramatic pressure decrease (~ 2 bar) is observed under annealingbar) is observed under annealing
Solid Solid 33He-He-44He mixtures: observation of He mixtures: observation of anomalously fast mass transportanomalously fast mass transport
Systems under investigationSystems under investigation
Dilute Mixtures of Dilute Mixtures of 33He inHe in
44HeHe
Coherent band Coherent band
motion of impurities motion of impurities (quantum diffusion),(quantum diffusion),
Andreev-Lifshits model.Andreev-Lifshits model.
After separation: After separation:
Matrix – Matrix – 44He (HCP),He (HCP),
Inclusions – Inclusions – 33He (BCC).He (BCC).
Concentrated Concentrated MixturesMixtures
Localization of the Localization of the impurities impurities (Yu.Kagan, (Yu.Kagan, L.Maksimov,1983):L.Maksimov,1983):
δε > Δ; (δε ~ xδε > Δ; (δε ~ x4/34/3).).
At x>xAt x>xc c ~10% ~10% 33He: He: should be no mass should be no mass transfertransfer
Dilute Mixtures of Dilute Mixtures of 44He in He in 33HeHe
Incoherent tunnel motionIncoherent tunnel motion
(random distribution of 3He (random distribution of 3He nuclear spins).nuclear spins).
After separation:After separation:
Matrix – Matrix – 33He (BCC),He (BCC),
Inclusions – Inclusions – 44He (HCP).He (HCP).
Adjacent Problem: What can cause the Adjacent Problem: What can cause the 33He He impurities?impurities?
Measurements of the pressure variation Measurements of the pressure variation during phase transitionduring phase transition
1 – Phase separation:1 – Phase separation:
P(t)= (PP(t)= (Pf f –P–Pii) exp (-t/) exp (-t/))
2 – homogenization:2 – homogenization:- very fast process;very fast process;- P(t) depends on TP(t) depends on Tff-T-Tii..
)1(4.0 xxVE (W.Mullin,1968). At V=const: ;MVEV
EP PaxP ,106
xx00 =2,05 % =2,05 %33He; VHe; Vmm= 20,27cm= 20,27cm33/mole./mole.
Giant asymmetry of separation and homogenizationGiant asymmetry of separation and homogenization
Time variation of pressure for different Time variation of pressure for different TTff-T-Tii
a)a) TTii=103 mK; T=103 mK; Tff=110mK.=110mK.
effeff= 1200s.= 1200s.
b)b) TTii=103 mk; T=103 mk; Tff=150mK.=150mK.
effeff= 850s.= 850s.
c)c) TTii=103mK; T=103mK; Tff=570mK.=570mK.
effeff= 150s.= 150s.
Suggestion:Suggestion:Such fast mass transport Such fast mass transport might be provided by might be provided by nondiffusive ballistic processnondiffusive ballistic process
The rate of homogenization does not depend on initial The rate of homogenization does not depend on initial concentration xconcentration x00
XX00=2.6% =2.6% 33HeHe
XX00=34.2% =34.2% 33HeHe
XX00=87.1% =87.1% 33HeHe
V.Grigorev, V.Maidanov, V.Grigorev, V.Maidanov, A.Penzev,A.Penzev,S.Rubets, E.Rudavskii, S.Rubets, E.Rudavskii, A.Rybalko, LTP, 2005.A.Rybalko, LTP, 2005.
-The character of all The character of all curves is the samecurves is the same sep sep / / homhom > 300 > 300
-The fast homogenization The fast homogenization can not be explained by can not be explained by ballistic processballistic process
--Very fast mass transport is observed Very fast mass transport is observed under transition from phase separated to under transition from phase separated to homogeneous state of solid 3He-4He homogeneous state of solid 3He-4He mixtures.mixtures.- - Probably we a dealing with a new Probably we a dealing with a new unknown mechanism of mass transfer.unknown mechanism of mass transfer.What is the nature of the mechanism?What is the nature of the mechanism?
- - In concentrated In concentrated 33He-He-44He mixtures, theory He mixtures, theory predicts that diffusion is depressed due to predicts that diffusion is depressed due to localization of impuritieslocalization of impurities but experiments but experiments showshow intense mass transfer.intense mass transfer.
Conclusion Conclusion 22
What happens in solid helium at the interface What happens in solid helium at the interface region?region?
1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
26
28
30
32
Liquid He
BCC
Pre
ss
ure
, b
ar
Temperature, K
HCP
NMR experiment
- Two strongly different crystalline structures;
- The ease of formation of defects in the interface region;
A.Polev, N.Mikhin, E.Rudavskii, JLTP, 2002.
The aim: identification of diffusion processes in each of the coexisting phases.
Method: pulsed NMR technique (spin echo) f=3.6MHz; probe pulses 90o- -180o.
Experimental conditions: x= 1.05 %3He; T= 1.3 – 1.9 K;
BCC-HCP transition in solid BCC-HCP transition in solid heliumhelium
Spin-echo decaySpin-echo decay
)3
2exp( 322
ii
i DG
An additional diffusion process is clearly defined at small . The corresponding D'xdepends on (bounded diffusion).
=10ms
0.3ms
25ms
52ms
1966,....
13
2
2
4'
CottsMRandWayneCR
D
aB
AD
aD
xxx
The bounded diffusion
The fitting parameters: a=(2±0.5)10-3 cm;
Dx=(4±2)10-
4cm2/s.
The diffusion echo decay was identified for coexisting phases – BCC and HCP.
The Carr-Pursell method: the echo amplitude The Carr-Pursell method: the echo amplitude h h at the distance 2at the distance 2::
h/hh/h00 = =
The diffusion coefficients for each of the The diffusion coefficients for each of the coexisting phasescoexisting phases
Along the BCC-HCP phase equilibrium line
Along the melting curve
HCP
BCC
New phase
BCC
HCP
New Phase
Pressure measurements during the HCP-BCC Pressure measurements during the HCP-BCC transitiontransition
(N.Mikhin, E.Rudavskii, Ye.Vekhov, JLTP, 2007)(N.Mikhin, E.Rudavskii, Ye.Vekhov, JLTP, 2007)
1.59 1.62 1.65 1.6828.0
28.2
28.4
28.6
1.4 1.5 1.6 1.726
27
28
29
30 5
43
2
P,b
ar
T,K
1
Liquid He
BCC
HCP
1,56 1,60 1,64 1,68
27,8
28,0
28,2
28,4
1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,826
27
28
29
30
5
4
3
2
1
P,b
ar
T,K
Liquid He
BCC
HCP
0 100 200 300 400 500 60028.0
28.1
28.2
28.3
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
P,b
ar
time,s
b)
a)
54
32
T,K
1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 35028.0
28.2
28.4
28.6
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
P,b
ar
time,s
54
3
2
b)
T,K
a)
1
Well-annealed crystal Non-annealed crystal
Monotonic exponential time dependence of pressure at each heating step
The pressure drops by 0.2at (p.23)( Crystallization of liquid droplets formed during the HCP-BCC transition)
Conclusion 3Conclusion 3
An additional diffusion process with An additional diffusion process with very high diffusion coefficient Dvery high diffusion coefficient Dxx is is observed during the BCC-HCP observed during the BCC-HCP transition. The diffusion is spatially transition. The diffusion is spatially restricted. restricted.
In non-annealed crystals a sharp In non-annealed crystals a sharp pressure drop is observed during the pressure drop is observed during the HCP-BCC transition.HCP-BCC transition.
We suggest that liquid droplets We suggest that liquid droplets appear on the HCP-BCC interfaceappear on the HCP-BCC interface
SummarySummary
New effects have been observed in solid helium New effects have been observed in solid helium which may be of relevance to the supersolid which may be of relevance to the supersolid problem:problem:
TT22 contribution to the pressure in non- contribution to the pressure in non-annealed helium crystals.annealed helium crystals.
Very fast mass transfer during transition of Very fast mass transfer during transition of phase-separated phase-separated 33He-He-44He mixtures into He mixtures into homogeneous state.homogeneous state.
Anomaly in kinetics of the BCC-HCP transition Anomaly in kinetics of the BCC-HCP transition attested that liquid droplets are formed attested that liquid droplets are formed