anticipating new physics @ the lhc
DESCRIPTION
Anticipating New Physics @ the LHC. Why the Terascale? Scenarios for Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and the Gauge Hierarchy LHC Signatures Connection to Dark Matter Summary: Discoveries are only months away!. APS April Meeting, 2007. J. Hewett, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Anticipating New Physics @ the LHC
• Why the Terascale?• Scenarios for Electroweak Symmetry
Breaking and the Gauge Hierarchy– LHC Signatures– Connection to Dark Matter
• Summary: Discoveries are only months away!
APS April Meeting, 2007 J. Hewett, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Why the Terascale?
• Electroweak Symmetry breaks at energies ~ 1 TeV (Higgs or ???)
• Gauge Hierarchy: Nature is fine-tuned or Higgs mass must be stabilized by
New Physics ~ 1 TeV
• Dark Matter: Weakly Interacting Massive Particle must have mass ~ 1 TeV to reproduce observed DM density
A Cellar of New Ideas
’67 The Standard Model
’77 Vin de Technicolor
’70’s Supersymmetry: MSSM
’90’s-now SUSY Beyond MSSM
’90’s CP Violating Higgs
’98 Extra Dimensions
’02 Little Higgs
’03 Fat Higgs
’03 Higgsless’04 Split Supersymmetry’05 Twin Higgs
a classic!aged to perfection
better drink now
mature, balanced, welldeveloped - the Wino’s choice
complex structure
sleeper of the vintagewhat a surprise!
svinters blend
all upfront, no finishlacks symmetry
young, still tannicneeds to develop
bold, peppery, spicyuncertain terrior
J. Hewett
finely-tuned
double the taste
The Standard Model of Particle Physics
Symmetry:
SU(3)C x SU(2)L x U(1)Y
Building Blocks of Matter:
QCD Electroweak
Spontaneously Broken to QED
This structure is experimentally confirmed!
The Standard Model Higgs Boson
Economy: 1 scalar doublet
Higgs Potential:V() = 22/2 + 4/4
Spontaneous Symmetry BreakingChooses a vacuum v = 0||0and shifts the field = - v
V() = m22/2 + v3 + 4/4
gives 1 physical Higgs scalar with m = 2 v
Masses of electroweak gauge bosons proportional to v
We need to discover the Higgs and experimentally test this potential and the Higgs properties!
Higgs Mass Upper Bound: Gauge Boson Scattering
Higgs
Higgs
Bad violation of unitarity ~ E2
Restores unitarity
Expand cross section into partial wavesUnitarity bound (Optical theorem!) |Re a0| < ½Gives mH < 1 TeV
LHC is designed to explore this entire region!
Present Limits:
Direct Searches at LEP: mH > 114.4 GeV
Indirect Searches at LEP/SLC:mH < 150-200 GeV @ 95% CL
Z ZHiggs
Z
The Hierarchy ProblemEnergy (GeV)
1019
1016
103
10-18Solar SystemGravity
Weak
GUT
Planckd
ese
rt
Future Collider Energies
All of known physics
mH2 ~ ~
MPl2
Quantum Corrections:
Virtual Effects dragWeak Scale to MPl
The Hierarchy Problem: Supersymmetry
Energy (GeV)
1019
1016
103
10-18Solar SystemGravity
Weak
GUT
Planckd
ese
rt
Future Collider Energies
All of known physics
mH2 ~ ~
MPl2
Quantum Corrections:
Virtual Effects dragWeak Scale to MPl
mH2
~
~ - MPl2
boson
fermion
Large virtual effects cancel order by order in perturbation theory
Supersymmetry:
•Symmetry between fermions and bosons•Predicts that every particle has a superpartner of equal mass ( SUSY is broken: many competing models!)•Suppresses quantum effects•Can make quantum mechanics consistent with gravity (with other ingredients)
LHC Supersymmetry Discovery Reach
Model where gravity mediates SUSY breaking – 5 free parameters at high energies
Squark and Gluino mass reach is2.5-3.0 TeV @ 300 fb-1
MSSM: tension with fine-tuning
Competing factors:– Mass of lightest higgs mh < MZ at tree-level
large quantum corrections from top sector
If stop mass ~ 1 TeV
– Stability of Higgs mass stops cut-off top contribution to quadratic
divergence stops can’t be too heavy
– Z mass relationship
< (130 GeV)2
Resolve Fine-Tuning: Extend the MSSM
• NMSSM (Next-to Minimal SSM)– Add a Higgs Singlet- Evade LEP bounds – minimize fine-tuning!- Regions where Higgs discovery is difficult @ LHC
• MNMSSM (Minimally Non-minimal MSSM)– Lightest higgs < 145 GeV– Observable @ LHC
• Gauge Extensions of MSSM– Mh < 250 (350) GeV
• Split Supersymmetry
Dermisek, Gunion, …
Batra, Delgado, Kaplan, Tait
Panagiotakopoulos, Pilaftis
•A component of Dark Matter could be the Lightest Neutralino of Supersymmetry - stable and neutral with mass ~ 0.1 – 1 TeV•In this case, electroweak strength annihilation gives relic density of
m2
ΩCDM h2 ~ (1 TeV)2
Dark Matter in Supersymmetry
Mass of Dark Matter Particle from Supersymmetry (TeV)
Fra
cti
on
of
tota
l D
ark
Matt
er
den
sit
y
Determination of Dark Matter Density @ LHC
• Measure SUSY properties @ LHC
• Benchmark point SPS1a
• Dependence on Stau mass determination
Baltz, Battaglia, Peskin, Wizansky hep-ph/0602187
The Hierarchy Problem: Extra Dimensions
Energy (GeV)
1019
1016
103
10-18Solar SystemGravity
Weak – Quantum Gravity
GUT
Planckd
ese
rt
Future Collider Energies
All of known physics
Simplest Model: Large Extra Dimensions
= Fundamental scale in 4 + dimensions
MPl2 = (Volume) MD
2+
Gravity propagates in D = 3+1 + dimensions
Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulis, Dvali
Kaluza-Klein Modes in a Detector
Mee [GeV]
Eve
nts
/ 50
GeV
/ 1
00 f
b-1
102
10
1
10-1
10-2
LHC
Indirect Signature
Missing Energy Signature
pp g + Gn
JLH Vacavant, Hinchliffe
Graviton Exchange Modified with Running Gravitational Coupling
Insert Form Factor in coupling to
parameterize running
M*D-2 [1+q2/t2M*
2 ]-1
Could reduce signal!D=3+4M* = 4 TeV
SM
t=
1
0.5
JLH, Rizzo, to appear
Black Hole Production @ LHC:
Black Holes produced when s > M*
Classical Approximation: [space curvature << E]
E/2
E/2b
b < Rs(E) BH forms
Geometric Considerations:
Naïve = Rs2(E), details show this holds up to a
factor of a few
Dimopoulos, LandsbergGiddings, Thomas
Production rate is enormous!
1 per sec at LHC!
JLH, Lillie, Rizzohep-ph/0503178
Determination of Number of Large Extra Dimensions
The Hierarchy Problem: Extra Dimensions
Energy (GeV)
1019
1016
103
10-18Solar SystemGravity
Weak
GUT
Planckd
ese
rt
Future Collider Energies
All of known physics
Model II: Warped Extra Dimensions
wk = MPl e-kr
strong curvature
Randall, Sundrum
Number of Events in Drell-Yan
For this same model embedded in a string theory: AdS5 x S
Kaluza-Klein Modes in a Detector: SM on the brane
Davoudiasl, JLH, Rizzo
Kaluza-Klein Modes in a Detector: SM off the brane
Fermion wavefunctions in the bulk: decreased couplings to light fermions for gauge & graviton KK states
gg Gn ZZ
gg gn tt
Agashe, Davoudiasl, Perez, Soni hep-ph/0701186
-
Lillie, Randall, Wang, hep-ph/0701164
The Hierarchy Problem: Little Higgs
Energy (GeV)
1019
1016
103
10-18Solar SystemGravity
Weak
GUT
Planckd
ese
rt
Future Collider Energies
All of known physics
Little Hierarchies!
104 New Physics!
Simplest Model: The Littlest Higgs with ~ 10 TeV
No UV completion
Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Katz, Nelson
The Hierarchy Problem: Little Higgs
Energy (GeV)
1019
1016
103
10-18Solar SystemGravity
Weak
GUT
Planck
Future Collider Energies
All of known physics
Stacks of Little Hierarchies
104 New Physics!
Simplest Model: The Littlest Higgs with 1 ~ 10 TeV 2 ~ 100 TeV 3 ~ 1000 TeV …..
105
106
.
.
.
New Physics!
New Physics!
Little Higgs: The Basics
• The Higgs becomes a component of a larger multiplet of scalars,
transforms non-linearly under a new global symmetry
• New global symmetry undergoes SSB leaves Higgs as goldstone• Part of global symmetry is gauged Higgs is pseudo-goldstone
• Careful gauging removes Higgs 1-loop divergences
2
mh2 ~ , > 10 TeV, @ 2-loops!
(162)2
3-Scale Model
> 10 TeV: New Strong Dynamics
Global Symmetry
f ~ /4 ~ TeV: Symmetires Broken
Pseudo-Goldstone Scalars New Gauge Fields New Fermions
v ~ f/4 ~ 100 GeV: Light Higgs
SM vector bosons & fermions
Sample Spectrum
Little Higgs Gauge Production
Azuelos etal, hep-ph/0402037
Birkedal, Matchev, Perelstein, hep-ph/0412278
WZ WH WZ 2j + 3l +
The Hierarchy Problem: HiggslessEnergy (GeV)
1019
1016
103
10-18Solar SystemGravity
Weak
GUT
Planckd
ese
rt
Future Collider Energies
All of known physics
Warped Extra Dimensions
wk = MPl e-kr
With NO Higgs boson!
strong curvature
Csaki, Grojean,Murayama, Pilo, Terning
Framework: EW Symmetry Broken by Boundary Conditions
SU(2)L x SU(2)R x U(1)B-L in 5-d Warped bulk
Planckbrane TeV-brane
SU(2)R x U(1)B-L
U(1)Y
SU(2)L x SU(2)R
SU(2)D
SU(2) Custodial Symmetryis preserved!
WR, ZR get
Planckscale masses
W, Z get TeV scale masses left massless!
BC’s restricted by variation of the action at boundary
Exchange gauge KK towers:
Conditions on KK masses & couplings:
(g1111)2 = k (g11k)2
4(g1111)2 M12 = k (g11k)2 Mk
2
Necessary, but not sufficient, to guarantee perturbative unitarity!
Csaki etal, hep-ph/0305237
Unitarity in Gauge Boson Scattering: What do we do without a Higgs?
Production of Gauge KK States @ LHC
gg, qq g1 dijets-
Davoudiasl, JLH, Lilllie, Rizzo Balyaev, Christensen
Gauge Hierarchy Problem
Cosmological Constant Problem
Planck Scale
Weak Scale
CosmologicalScale
The Hierarchy Problem: Who Cares!!
We have much bigger Problems!
Split Supersymmetry:
Energy (GeV) MGUT ~ 1016 GeV
MS : SUSY broken at high scale ~ 109-13 GeV
Mweak
1 light Higgs + Fermionsprotected by chiral symmetry
Scalars receive mass @ high scale
Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulis hep-ph/0405159Giudice, Romanino hep-ph/0406088
Collider Phenomenology: Gluinos
• Pair produced via strong interactions as usual• Gluinos are long-lived• No MET signature• Form R-hadrons
g~q~
q
q
10
Rate ~ 0, due to heavy squark masses!
Gluino pair + jet cross section
JLH, Lillie, Masip, Rizzo hep-ph/0408248
100 fb-1
Density of Stopped Gluinos in ATLAS
See also ATLAS study, Kraan etal hep-ph/0511014
Arvanitaki, etal hep-ph/0506242
This is a Special Time in Particle Physics
• Urgent QuestionsProvocative discoveries lead to urgent questions
• ConnectionsQuestions seem to be related in fundamental, yet
mysterious, ways
• ToolsWe have the experimental tools, technologies,
and strategies to tackle these questions
We are witnessing a Scientific Revolution in the Making!