anton jackson, ospi sandy christie, puget sound esd ken marks, tacoma schools
DESCRIPTION
Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success. Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD Ken Marks, Tacoma Schools February 27-28, March 27-28, 2013. Welcome to the SBAC Item Writing Workshop. Please… Get some refreshments - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
S
Connecting to the Common Core State
Standards for Mathematics-
Assessment Tools for Student Success
Anton Jackson, OSPISandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD
Ken Marks, Tacoma SchoolsFebruary 27-28, March 27-28, 2013
Welcome to the SBAC Item Writing Workshop
Please… Get some refreshments Rate yourself on your knowledge of the Common Core State
Standards for Mathematics and the SMARTER/BALANCED assessment writing process using the sticky dots
Find a seat Make a name tent Introduce yourself to your table mates
Workshop Goals
Gain an understanding of the variety of SBAC task types. Apply a process similar to one used by Smarter-Balanced
Consortium to produce classroom-based formative assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards.
Develop knowledge and skills necessary to use formative assessment data to influence instructional change. How would we use these? What is the nature of student conversations around these items?
Participate in an online community sharing assessment items.
Today’s Goals
Identify similarities and differences between familiar item types and test structures and the SBAC assessment structure.
Understand and use the item development process and relevant guiding documents.
Understand CCSSM and Practices shifts Write items for content coming soon in your classes Analyze items for Depth of Knowledge
A pre-assessment
This assessment is designed to get you thinking about similarities and differences between assessments you are familiar with and the structure of the SMARTER/BALANCED Assessment Consortium (SBAC) assessments being developed
Analyzing the pre-assessment
Which item structures would you classify as ‘traditional’? What are the characteristics of these items?
Which items would you classify as ‘new’ or ‘non-traditional’? What characteristics make these items different from the others?
Evidence Centered Design-Assessment Claims in SBAC Assessment
Primary Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.
Primary Claim 2: Problem Solving Students can solve a range of well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem-solving strategies
Primary Claim 3: Communicating Reasoning Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.
Primary Claim 4: Modeling and Data Analysis Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.
Item Types in SBAC Assessment
Selected response-SR Multiple choice Extended multiple choice
Constructed response-CR Extended response-ER (A CR item as part of a performance
task) Technology enhanced-TE Performance task-PT
Item Codes in Intro Assessment
Item 1: MAT.HS.SR.1.00FIF.K.082
Subject.GradeLevel.ItemType.Claim.ContentDomain.Target.ItemNumber
Item Codes in Intro Assessment
Item 1: MAT.HS.SR.1.00FIF.K.082Item 2: TraditionalItem 3: MAT.08.CR.1.0000F.E.135Item 4: MAT.08.TE.1.000EE.C.200_V1Item 5: MAT.08.CR.1.0000F.F.090Item 6: TraditionalItem 7: MAT.08.TE.2.000EE.A.145Item 8: MAT.HS.ER.2.00SID.C.264Item 9: MAT.08.ER.3.000EE.A.139_V1
Anton JacksonAn overview of the SBAC Assessment System
The nature of the MSP/EOC & Smarter-Balanced Assessments
The life of an item Key features of item writing to which classroom
teachers should be attending