anxiety and pain control 2007
DESCRIPTION
Anxiety and Pain Control 2007. John A. Yagiela, DDS, PhD Utah Dental Association Salt Lake City February 9, 2007. Oral Sedation Topics. Review of oral sedation The continuing debate over multiple dosing techniques with triazolam ADA guidelines review Reversal of triazolam with flumazenil - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Anxiety and Pain Control 2007
John A. Yagiela, DDS, PhD
Utah Dental Association
Salt Lake City
February 9, 2007
Oral Sedation Topics
Review of oral sedation The continuing debate over multiple dosing
techniques with triazolam ADA guidelines review Reversal of triazolam with flumazenil Special topics in patient evaluation for oral
sedation
Preference for Sedation/GA
Chanpong et al., Anesth Prog 2005; 52:3-11
• Canadian telephone survey
• n=1100• 5.5% felt very nervous
or terrified
Standard approaches to oral sedation (single dose)
Adults Diazepam 2-15 mg Lorazepam 1-4 mg Triazolam 0.125-0.5 mg Alprazolam 0.25-1 mg
Children Chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg up to 1 gm Hydroxyzine 25-100 mg (up to 1 mg/lb) Midazolam 0.25-1 mg/kg (up to 20 mg) Diazepam 0.25-0.6 mg/kg (up to 15 mg) Combinations with or without opioids
Oral Premedicants/Anxiolyticsof Choice
Criteria High safety margin Reversible Fast onset, mixed durations
Specific agents Benzodiazepines Specific 1 agonists: zolpidem
Mechanism of action
Binding to specific benzodiazepine receptors: Increased binding of GABA to GABAA
receptors Increased responsiveness of chloride
channels to GABA binding
BenzodiazepinesBenzodiazepines
GABAA receptordrug binding sites
Pharmacologic effects
Anxiety relief CNS depression with high doses Relatively shallow dose response Anticonvulsant activity Anterograde amnesia Centrally mediated muscle relaxation
BenzodiazepinesBenzodiazepines
Adverse effects
Loss of airway and respiratory depression Paradoxical reactions (excitement,
disinhibition) Sexual fantasies Modest dependence liability Narrow-angle glaucoma risk Teratogenesis potential
BenzodiazepinesBenzodiazepines
Pharmacokinetics of benzodiazepines
Diazepam (2-15 mg) Onset: 1 hr Duration: 3 hr Terminal half-life 25-50 hr (with long-acting
metabolite) Lorazepam (1-4 mg)
Onset: 1.5-2 hr Duration: 6 hr Terminal half-life 10-16 hr
Triazolam (0.125-0.5 mg) Onset: 45 min Duration: 2 hr Terminal half-life 2-5 hr
Chlordiazepoxide
Desmethylchlor-
diazepoxide
Demoxepam
Nordazepam Oxazepam
Clorazepate
Diazepam
Halazepam
Prazepam
Flurazepam
Lorazepam
Alprazolam
Midazolam
Triazolam
α - Hydroxy
derivatives
Glucuronide
conjugates
13-3.Table Metabolism of benzodiazepines
Quazepam
Estazolam
- -N Hydroxyethyl
flurazepam
2- -Oxo quazepam
Temazepam
- Long acting
metabolites
3- Hydroxy
compounds
- Hydroxy
metabolites
α
- -N desalkyl
flurazepam
3-Hydroxy
derivatives
. Drugs available for clinical use are listed in bold type With the exception of the prodrugs clorazepate
, .and prazepam only the glucuronide conjugates are inactive
Triazolam (Halcion)
Primary therapeutic use: insomnia Adverse effects: CNS depression, amnesia Precautions: myasthenia gravis, pulmonary disease,
narrow-angle glaucoma, C-IV controlled substance, pregnancy category X
Dosage forms: tablets: 0.125 and 0.25 mg Directions: 0.25 (0.125-0.5) mg 30 min before bedtime or
45 min before treatment Clinical duration: 2 hr
N
Cl N
OCH3
N
Cl N
H3C
Cl
N
Diazepam Triazolam
Benzodiazepine structures
N
Triazolam Hydroxy metabolites
Triazolam metabolism
Cl
N
Cl N
H3CNN
N
Cl N
H3CNN
Cl
α- or 1´-hydroxylation
4-hydrox-ylation
Pharmacokinetic drug interactions
With CYP3A4 metabolic enzyme inhibitors Erythromycin (EES) and clarithromycin (Biaxin) Ketoconazole (Nizoral) and related antifungal drugs Fluvoxamine (Luvox) and related antidepressants Ritonavir (Norvir) and related anti-AIDS drugs Verapamil (Isoptin), diltiazem (Cardizem) and related Ca+-channel
blockers Amiodarone (Cordarone), cimetadine (Tagamet), nefazodone (Serzone),
zafirlukast (Accolate), ergotamine Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid), rifabutin (Mycobutin), isoniazid
(Nydrazid), Aprepitant (Emend), imatinib (Gleevec), cyclosporine (Sandimmune) Grapefruit juice
TriazolamTriazolam
Pharmacokinetic drug interactions (cont.)
With 3A4 metabolic enzyme inducers Rifampin (Rifadin) Phenytoin (Dilantin) Glucocorticoids Carbamazepine (Tegretol) Phenobarbital (and other barbiturates) Modafinil (Provigil) St. John’s wort (hypericum) Cigarette smoke (aryl hydrocarbons)
TriazolamTriazolam
Enhanced efficacy of sublingual triazolam
SL triazolam (0.25 mg) more effective than oral triazolam in reducing anxiety and pain during oral surgery
SL triazolam resulted in higher peak plasma concentrations but no difference in recovery rate or side effects
Berthold et al: Oral Surg 84:119-24, 19997
Enhanced bioavailability of sublingual triazolam (0.5 mg)
Peak plasma concentrations, times SL: 4.7 ng/mL, 1.22 hr Oral: 3.9 ng/mL, 1.25 hr
Metabolic half-lives SL: 4.1 hr Oral: 3.7 hr
SL has 28% greater bioavailability
Scavone et al: J Clin Pharmacol 26:208-10, 1986
DOCS: Dental Organization for Conscious Sedation
Brainchild of Dr. Mark Silverman Aim was to provide the benefits of conscious
sedation without impediments of state regulations, advanced training requirements
Early courses to the profession touted “Sleep Dentistry” using multiple doses of triazolam (Halcion)
Introduction
Main Concerns of Dental Organizations and Regulatory Agencies
“Sleep dentistry” was either misleading advertising or promoted unlawful drug administration
Weekend courses largely devoted to marketing have resulted in inadequately educated clinicians
Giving additional doses before the full effects of the first dose have occurred may result in oversedation
“Titration of oral medication for the purposes of sedation is unpredictable. Repeated dosing of orally administered sedative agents may result in an alteration of the state of consciousness beyond the intent of the practitioner.” (ADA Guidelines)
Time (hr)
Stacked oral dosing (0.25 mg)every 30 min
Triazolam (ng/mL)
Comparative Kinetics and Response to Triazolam (0.25 mg)
Data from Greenblatt et al:J Pharmacol ExpTher 293:435-43, 2000.
Acute tolerance to triazolam
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
SDS TriazolamSDS PlaceboTriazolam (ng/mL)
Data from Kroboth et al: J Pharmacol Exp Ther 264:1047-55, 1993
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0Symbol Digit Substitution Latency
(sec)
Triazolam (ng/mL)
Enhanced bioavailability of sublingual triazolam (0.5 mg)
Peak plasma concentrations, times SL: 4.7 ng/mL, 1.22 hr Oral: 3.9 ng/mL, 1.25 hr
Metabolic half-lives SL: 4.1 hr Oral: 3.7 hr
SL has 28% greater bioavailability
Scavone et al: J Clin Pharmacol 26:208-10, 1986
Fatalities with oral benzodiazepines
Adult cases Most involve suicide attempts Several involve triazolam alone Very rare in a therapeutic setting
Fatalities with oral benzo-diazepines (2)
Overweight teenage football player received multiple doses of alprazolam (Xanax) for oral sedation Leaves the office awake, ambulatory with
assistance Cardiac arrest at home
Fatalities with oral benzo-diazepines (3)
Man receives multiple doses of triazolam (Halcion) for oral sedation Leaves the office awake, ambulatory Argues with wife and drives home Fatal car crash
Nonfatal reaction to oral triazolam
30 y.o. woman in good health receives 2 mg of triazolam (Halcion) (eight 0.25 mg tablets) for oral sedation over 6 hr period Prescribed Vicodin (500 mg acetaminophen/ 5
mg hydrocodone) for postoperative pain to take 1 tab every 4-6 hr
Husband notices patient taking four tablets in 15 min
Patient has no memory of entire evening
Prescription for Fatality
Large doses of multiple medications Lack of appropriate monitoring Lack of effective emergency response Premature discharge home Discharge shortly after reversal of sedation Operation of dangerous machinery Failure to remember postoperative
instructions, drug use Elderly, frail patients
Potency ratio 4
Age-related differences in midazolam responsiveness
Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Effects of Multidose Sublingual Triazolam
in Healthy Volunteers
Jackson DL, Milgrom P, Heacox GA, Kharasch ED
J Clin Psychopharmacol 2006;26(1):4-8
0.2 mg
0.25 mg
0.5 mg
0.25 mg
Study Design and Measures
timetriazolam
admin.flumazenil
admin.
bloodsample(5 ml)
vital signs(BP, HR,
RR, SaO2)
sedationrating
(observer)
bispectralanalysis
sedationself-report
(participant)
cognitive/psychomotor
(DSST)
T0 • • • • • • T30 • • • • T60 • • • • • • T90 • • • • T120 • • • • • • T150 • • • • T180 • • • • T185 • • • T190 • • • • • T200 • • • T240 • • •
Jackson et al: J Clin Psychopharmacol 26:4-8, 2006
Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OA/AS) Scale
Responsiveness SpeechFacial
ExpressionEyes Score
Readily/
Normal toneNormal Normal No ptosis 5
LethargicMild
slurring
Mild
relaxationGlazed 4
Responds after
loud callingSlurring
Marked
relaxation
Marked
ptosis 3
Responds after
mild prodding
Few words
recognizable
Marked
relaxation
Marked
ptosis 2
No response to
prodding/shakingNo words
Marked
relaxation
Marked
ptosis 1
Jackson et al: J Clin Psychopharmacol 26:4-8, 2006
Objectives
To evaluate the CNS depression evoked by the repeated dosing of sublingual triazolam, to a total dose of 1.0 mg, in healthy adults,
To determine the time-dependent plasma concentrations of triazolam in a repeated dosing paradigm,
To compare the efficacy of a single intraoral submucosal (SL, tongue), intramuscular (IM), and intravenous (IV) injection of flumazenil (0.2 mg) at reversing the sedative effects of triazolam.
Clinical Interpretation of Bispectral Analysis BIS Score Clinical State
100
0
60
40
awake
sedated
moderate hypnotic level
deep hypnotic level
isoelectric EEG, total suppression
Rosow C - Anesthesiol Clin North America - 01-DEC-2001; 19(4): 947-66, xi
1801501209060300
0
1
2
3
4
5
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
AVERAGE
Time (minutes post-1st SL triazolam dose)
OAA/S Score
0.25 mg 0.25 mg0.5 mg
Observer Rating of Sedation During Incremental Triazolam Dosing by Subject
Jackson et al: J Clin Psychopharmacol26:4-8, 2006
1801501209060300
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
AVERAGE
Time (minutes post-1st SL triazolam dose)
BIS Score
0.25 mg 0.25 mg0.5 mg
Bispectral Analysis During Incremental Triazolam Dosing by Subject
Jackson et al: J Clin Psychopharmacol26:4-8, 2006
1206000
20
40
60
80
100
#569#570#571#572#573#574#575#576#577#578
Psychomotor Function Assessment (Digit Symbol Substitution Test)
Time (minutes)
DSST Raw Score
subject #
0.25 mgtriazolam
0.25 mgtriazolam
0.5 mgtriazolam
Jackson et al: J Clin Psychopharmacol26:4-8, 2006
1801501209060300
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
AVERAGE
Time (minutes post-1st SL triazolam dose)
Plasma Concentration of Triazolam (ng/ml)
0.25 mg 0.25 mg0.5 mg
Time-Dependent Changes in Plasma Concentrations of Triazolam by Subject
Jackson et al: J Clin Psychopharmacol26:4-8, 2006
Risk-benefit considerations
There is a strong need and demand for sedation services not currently met by available resources for general dentistry
Safety is of paramount concern Safety of enteral sedation should be at least
as good as alternative methods of anesthesia care
USP Workshop