“controlling risks associated with intellectual assets”...the value of intellectual property...
TRANSCRIPT
““Controlling Risks Associated Controlling Risks Associated With Intellectual AssetsWith Intellectual Assets””
3030thth October 2009October 2009Hyatt Regency, Hong KongHyatt Regency, Hong Kong
Audrey YapManaging Partner
Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
WIPO Regional Symposium On Management of Intellectual Capital, Intellectual Assets And Intellectual
Property
2© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Issues for ConsiderationBackgroundUnderstanding concept of risk in relation to
Intellectual AssetsCategories of risksRisk related with strategic alliances like licensing and distributorshipContract manufacturing – IP issues and risksDealing with risks – clear steps
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
3© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
BackgroundA company’s economic strength and global competitiveness depends even more on successfully harnessing intangible assets within the organisation.
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
4© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
The value of Intellectual Property & Intellectual Assets effectively increased over the last few years. Increase in value means increased competition for Intellectual Property & Intellectual Assets and increased litigation.Effect – increased risk for IP owners and users.
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
5© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Risks can be categorisedInfringement risksEnforcement risksTitle risksInvestment risksStorage or maintenance risk
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
6© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Infringement risksActivities haltedHuge legal expenses if infringing or
just to defendRisk paying substantial damages,
resulting in losses or increased business cost
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
7© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Enforcement risksEffect of 3rd parties infringing your IPSuffer reduction in value of own IPRisk of bearing legal fees as a result of infringement by others
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
8© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Title risksOwnership is key for IPNavigating IP system, multiple countries challengingRisk business cannot maximise value if unable to obtain grant or registration if government officials such as examiners unconvinced of patentability or registrability of IPRisk if licensee or buyers of IP doubt the IP the business claims
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
9© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Investment RisksIP developed at huge cost and investmentRisk if effort and expenditure invested not yield expected results, or results not useful for business
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
10© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Storage, maintenance, dissemination risks
Rapid technology development, software and digital media valuable
variety of harm resulting from dissemination of creative work and advertising particularly on internet
Also risk of damage to digitally stored IP
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
11© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Understanding risks allows for strategic IP management planningClearly need for good IP governance
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
12© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Issues are broad – focus is neededConsider example of strategic alliances like licensing, distribution or manufacturing agreements
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
13© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Key to managing risks in strategic alliances such as licensing, manufacturing, supply arrangements are setting in place processes for good prospects for successImportant documentation unambiguous
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
14© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Variety of alliances; and what the relationship is called is not consistentWhat is consistent is the alliance is based on Intellectual Capital, Intellectual Asset or Intellectual Property.Fundamentally, each party contributes Intellectual Capital, Intellectual Asset or Intellectual Property to gain an advantage that either will find difficult to obtain independently.
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
15© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Types of Intellectual Capital can be market access, customer relationship, people skillsTypes of Intellectual Property include patents, copyright, trade secrets, trademarks
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
16© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Types of Intellectual Property Trademark – Protects identity, reputation,
trade connectionCopyright – Protects creative expressionDesign – Protects appearance/ design of
article/ objectPatents – Protects Inventions, solutions to
problems, innovations
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
17© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Different types of Supplier/license or supplier/distributor arrangementsExample 1Supplier purely to just build product designed by purchaser
Little IP from supplierAlliance result of low cost, labour, tax
structures
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
18© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Example 2Supplier has own IP; Purchaser wants to leverage on Supplier’s competency; sometimes Supplier also has extensive distribution channelsHere Purchaser has IP such as testing procedures, tools, programs.Risk to Purchaser especially if limited competent suppliers Purchaser has to reveal know how.Also, profits may be constrained.
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
19© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Risk varies depending on type of arrangement, who has the IP, strengths of the partnersObjective would be to strike a balanceExample Purchaser must understand value of IP, manage development, quality control, process and tests. Not just hand over results/know how but license Supplier including patent license.Supplier can benefit – develop own bank of know how, cross pollinate ideas/ process/ techniques or obtain license for entire product line from Purchaser or Supplier
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
20© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Contract manufacturer vs Distributor
Risks are different; typically risk infringement action against distributor lower
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
21© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Contract manufacturerRisks to IP ownersRisks to manufacturer
Can manufacturer be sued by third party?Can manufacturer rely on licensors IP?
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
22© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Manufacturer/licensee may require certain indemnities from licensor against third party infringement action to mitigate risk, licensor will usually provide some very limited indemnity – rare to provide open ended indemnities
Licensor however can make certain representations to give assurances to licensee such as patents from other companies from which it has licensed rights or agree to seek additional licenses jointly with licensee.
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
23© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
STRUCTURE OF DEAL OR LICENSE IMPORTANTIn managing the risk
Identify strategic objectives of relationship to best deliver advantage
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
24© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
Key considerations and steps Identify your own IP identify licensee’s complimentary IPSelect party that can be trusted with your
IPAgree on reciprocal obligations on IPHave plan for maximizing value of
shared IP Provide for an exit plan
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
25© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
DisclaimerThis presentation and the materials connected herewith do not constitute legal adviceYou should consult your own lawyer about any specific problem you may have
WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009WIPO Regional Symposium, Hong Kong Oct 2009
26
Thank you Thank you for listeningfor listening
Yu Yu SarnSarn Audrey & PartnersAudrey & [email protected]@yusarn.comTel: + (65) 6358 2865Tel: + (65) 6358 2865Fax: + (65) 6358 2864Fax: + (65) 6358 2864
27© 2009 Yu Sarn Audrey & Partners
SPEAKER’S CV
Audrey YapLL.B.(Hon.s) LL.M
Advocate & Solicitor, Malaysia & SingaporeSolicitor, England & Wales
Registered Patent AgentAdjunct Fellow, IP Academy of Singapore
IAM 250 World’s Leading IP StrategistWho’s Who Legal (Singapore) 2008