ap english language and composition overview and wrap-up
TRANSCRIPT
AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION
Overview and Wrap-up
Critical Thinking: The Starting Point Rhetoric as the art of effective speaking
and writing. The importance of assessing opportunity,
audience, and decorum. Reasonableness as the goal for those
who would develop effective mental habits. Standards of Intellectual Inquiry as
essential to the development of the reasonable persona.
Current Issues: Enduring Questions Topics of immediate
and lasting importance to people. Modes of informed
discourse Exposition Narration Description Argumentation
Persuasive Appeals
Methods of Becoming Convinced To character (ethos), or
reputation “I am no orator, but…” (Socrates,
in Apology) To reason (logos), or coherence
“I think, therefore I am” (Descartes, Meditations)
To emotion (pathos), or passion “This was the most unkindest cut
of all!” (JC, 3.2.183)
Critical Reading: Procedures
Important Practices Annotate the text Summarize the main
idea Grasp the gist of the
argument Identify hidden
assumptions
Visual Rhetoric: Images as Arguments “The medium is the
message” (McLuhan)
Moving pictures Still Photography Charts and graphs Cartoons Painting Drawing Sculpture
Critical Writing: Analyzing Arguments Examining a Thesis
Author’s purpose Persuade or report
Author’s methods Present evidence
and proofs Author’s persona
Strategy and distance
Checklist for Analyzing Arguments State author’s claim & grounds. State your position. Identify strong & weak points. Comment on ethos
Author’s character Comment on logos
Argument’s logic Comment on pathos
Appropriateness of emotional appeal Use brief quotations. Evaluate the argument. Establish an appropriate tone.
Developing Your Own Arguments Getting Ideas
Freewriting Think on “paper.” Feel free to write
badly. Listing
Jotting Gisting
Diagramming Clustering Branching Columns
Your First Obligations
Ask questions. State your thesis early. Imagine your audience.
What do we have in common? Have in entertained and informed them?
Imply your thesis in your title. Have I informed them? Have I turned them off?
The Business of Paragraphing Attract the reader’s interest.
State the problem. Prepare the reader’s mind.
State what is to follow; define terms. Show the reader how the essay is
organized. Present the supporting evidence. Anticipate objections. Lead the reader toward a sense of closure.
The Conclusion
Good writers provide a sense of closure by Returning to something in the introduction Glancing at the wider implications of the
issue Illustrating the thesis with a closing
anecdote Summarizing without tediously repeating
the introduction.
A Logician’s View:
Deduction Premises force necessary
conclusion. Socrates’s mortality.
Induction Premises imply a
probable conclusion. The sun rising analogy.
Fallacies Methods of argument that
persuade by deceptive methods (dirty tricks) Distractions from the point.
A Philosopher’s View: Steven Toulmin
Toulmin Procedure
State the problem. State your claim and its
warrants. Support your claim with backup
data. Qualify your claim.
Consider counter-claims. Rebut the counter-claims.
Show how your claim has greater weight than the counter-claim.
A Psychologist’s View: Carl Rogers Argument implies threat and
miscommunication. Become partners, not adversaries. Communication should point toward solving the
problem—not attacking the person or group. Show sympathetic understanding of the
opponent. Recognize what is valid in the opposition’s
argument. Recognize that the most persons in the
opposition are persons of good will.
Rogerian Procedure
State the problem Give the opponent’s
position Grant whatever validity the
writer finds in that position Attempt to show how the
opposing position would be improved if the writer’s own position were accepted.
Moralist’s View: Ethical Analysis
QUESTIONS IN ETHICS
QUESTIONS OF FACT: 'IS'
QUESTIONS OF VALUE: 'OUGHT'
WORTH, GOOD, DESIRABILITY
DUTIES OR OBLIGATIONS
TRUTH AND FALSEHOOD
ONE FIRST HURDLE IN OVERCOMING ETHICAL DILEMMAS IS TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN FACT AND VALUE.
'I AM ALIVE' IS A FACT. 'I OUGHT TO LIVE' IS A VALUE.
A Moral Reasoning Checklist
Is the conduct in question limited by a rule? How does self-interest affect the issue? Is the defense of the conduct reasonable? Is the rule for the individual or the group? How the conduct consider the rights of
others? Would the conduct in question imply a
universal rule?
A Lawyer’s View: Civic Literacy Cases fall into two categories
Civil: individual vs. individual A claim of wrongful action is
made against another. Some redress of the grievance is
sought. Relevant evidence is brought to
the case. Criminal: state vs. individual
Felonies: seriously harmful actions
Misdemeanors: lesser harmful actions
Reporting Cases
Holding: the court’s decision It is usually one sentence.
Opinion: the support for the decision It is usually complex and lengthy exposition.
Majority: reasoning of the larger group. Concurring: qualified agreement with majority. Dissenting: disagreement with the majority.
Relevant facts and relevant law are considered.
Balancing and conflicting interests are considered.
A Literary Critic’s View: Literature What is author’s intent?
What we can infer about the author, based upon the work.
What did the author mean? What we can infer from the conscious or
unconscious motives of the author. What does the text say?
Textual, cultural, and historical contexts: the facts.
Interpreting
What does it mean? What evidence
supports your claim? Text Society Biography Psychology History Culture
Judging
What is a good work of art? Complex or unified?
Does it make sense? Wholesome or shocking?
What emotions does it evoke in me?
Original or derivative? Is it new or revisited?
Important or trivial? Is it instructive or
entertaining?
Abortion
What is the right to life? What is a human life? When does life become
human? What is the moral
standing of various life forms?
Affirmative Action
Is it fair? Is it racist? Is it reverse discrimination? Is it intended to last
forever? Are there special victim
classes that deserve certain dispensations?
Do the victimized deserve reparation at the expense of the innocent?
Gun Control
Who should have guns? What kind of guns should
be made, if any? What restrictions should
be placed on gun owners? Does a private citizen
have a right to carry? Should convicted
criminals have a right to own guns?
College Education
What is its purpose? Should everyone go to
college? How should college be
funded? Does everyone have a
right to college education?
Is it a superior education to vocational training?
The Death Penalty
Is it justified? If so, in what cases? If not, how do we treat the
convicted felon? Does cost/benefit analysis
apply? Does it prevent capital
crime? Is revenge just? Does “closure” justify
capital punishment?
Sex Education
Is it the school’s business? What grade level should
teach it? What are the limits of the
education? What is the role of parents? Does it solve the problems
related to it? Does it exacerbate them? Should schools distribute b/c
devices and products?
Drug Legalizaton
Should all drugs be legal?
Should some drugs be legal?
Should the state be in charge of growth and sale of drugs?
Do the punishments fit the crimes?
Illegal Immigration
Should all illegal immigrants be granted citizenship?
Should their children, born in the USA, be granted citizenship?
Should we build a wall and defend it with force?
Should we have open borders?
How do we control illegal immigration?
Intelligent Design
Is it science or religion?
Should it be taught in science class?
Are its claims valid?
Are its supporting arguments sufficient?
Marriage
Is marriage a moral obligation?
Is marriage irrelevant? Is marriage necessary? Is marriage between
same-sex couples right?
Is marriage a divine covenant?
Is divorce too easy?
Sexual Harassment
What is it? Does it apply in the
same way to all people?
Is it warranted in the workplace?
Is it harassment if all parties consent?
Is it indefinable?
Torture
Is it ever justifiable? If it saves lives, is it
permitted? If it causes no
permanent harm, is it justifiable?
If it causes death, is it wrong?
Does the welfare of the many outweigh the pain of a few?
Idealism
What is the ideal society? Which is more important,
the individual or the group?
Is a Constitution necessary?
What controls are needed to maintain society?
Is there such a thing as too much or too little government?
What is Happiness?
Is it equated with pleasure?
Is it equated with morality?
Is it equated with peace of mind?
Is it equated with knowledge?
Is it equated with mindlessness?
Is it equated with compassion?