[email protected] 1 3-5-3 defense defending the power runs, run fits and option...

26
[email protected] 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

Upload: sean-brady

Post on 26-Mar-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 1

3-5-3 DefenseDefending the power runs, run fits

and option responsibilities.

Thomas Cousins

Page 2: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 2

DEFENDING POWER FORMATIONS AND RUNS

• CANNOT GET OUTFLANKED BY FORMATION.

• ALWAYS CHECK FOR PLAYACTION.

• INSIDE LINEBACKERS BOUNCE EVERYTHING TO THE OUTSIDE

• OUTSIDE LINEBACKERS FORCE EVERYTHING INSIDE.

Page 3: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 3

Power formations

• We consider any type of double tight or double slot formation to be a power formation. Examples include:

• Double tight end

• Double wing

• Double tight L backs

• Unbalanced

• Overload

Page 4: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 4

Defending Double Tight BLAST

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

VS. DOUBLE TIGHT WE WANT OUR STUD AND WHIP TO TIGHTEN UP TO 1x4

Page 5: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 5

Defending Double Tight TOSS SWEEP

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

VS. DOUBLE TIGHT WE WANT OUR STUD AND WHIP TO TIGHTEN UP TO 1x4

Page 6: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 6

Defending Double Tight wing BLAST

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

VS. DOUBLE TIGHT WE WANT OUR STUD AND WHIP TO TIGHTEN UP TO 1x4

Page 7: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 7

Defending Double Tight wing WINGBACK LEAD

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

VS. DOUBLE TIGHT WE WANT OUR STUD AND WHIP TO TIGHTEN UP TO 1x4

STUD MUST GET UPFIELD AND FORCE THE PLAY INSIDE

Page 8: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 8

Defending Double wingWINGBACK COUNTER

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

VS. DOUBLE TIGHT WING WE WANT OUR STUD AND WHIP TO TIGHTEN UP TO 1x4 OUTSIDE OF WINGBACK

STUD MUST GET UPFIELD AND FORCE THE PLAY INSIDE

Page 9: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 9

Defending Double Tight overload

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 10: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 10

Defending Double slot

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

CAN STAY COVER 3 OR CHECK TO COVER

1 (MAN FREE)

Page 11: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 11

Other options vs. power formations

• TUFF

• GOALLINE

Page 12: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 12

TUFF

T N T ST

WP W M S

C FS C

Page 13: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 13

Goal line vs. double tight

WP T N T ST

W M S

C FS C

GOALLINE IS AN AUTOMATIC IN- MIKE GO

WE CAN, AND WILL, GET INTO GOALLINE ANYWHERE ON THE FIELD

Page 14: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 14

Goal line vs. Double Tight Wing

WP T N T ST

W M S C FS C

Page 15: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 15

Defending the option

Page 16: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 16

Because we always slant our front either right or left, our option rules may change depending on the direction of the slant and the type of option being run.

We do have a base set of option responsibilities in place. But as stated earlier they can and will change.

Page 17: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 17

Base option rulesTackles- slant in dive, slant out Qb

Nose- dive

Mike- dive

Sam and Will- opposite of tackle- if the tackle slants out you have dive. If he slants in you have QB

Stud and Whip- straight to pitch.

Free safety- QB to pitch

Corners- Pitch (late)

Page 18: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 18

inside veer vs. slant weak

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 19: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 19

inside veer vs. slant strong

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 20: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 20

midline vs. slant weak

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 21: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 21

Speed option vs. slant weak

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 22: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 22

Blitzes we like to use vs. the option

• In- fire- sam go

• Pinch- dog strong

• Slant weak- mike go

Page 23: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 23

In fire sam go vs. inside veer

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 24: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 24

Pinch dog strong vs. inside veer

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 25: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 25

Slant weak mike go vs. midline

T N T

WP W M S ST

C FS C

Page 26: Aphsfootball@yahoo.com 1 3-5-3 Defense Defending the power runs, run fits and option responsibilities. Thomas Cousins

[email protected] 26

Closing

• All year we kept expecting someone to line up in a power formation and be able to line up and just mash us.

• It never happened. If you can get good penetration with your DL and your linebackers fit correctly, we feel as if we can line up and play with anyone.