app b rubrics
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 App B Rubrics
1/4
FACULTY OF CHEMICAL & NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING
CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING I (BKF2453)APPENDIX BREPORT EVALUATION FORM
GROUP NUMBER :
PROJECT TITLE :
-
8/12/2019 App B Rubrics
2/4
The following criteria are the bases for evaluating BKF2453 Mini Project report for the module of Conceptual Design on a scale of 0 (very low) to 5 (very high)
according to the rubrics in the table below.
All calculations must be shownon clearly; otherwise they
would not be counted here.
Score Ranking
Unacceptable
(0)
Minimum Acceptable
(1)
Acceptable
(2)
Good
(3)
Very Good(4)
Excellent
(5)Total Score
Input: impurities
management
No impurity
management
Raw materials were selected from the available supplies but only some of the impurities were man aged or the
management is wrong. The marks are based on the percentage of right answer
Raw materials were selected
and the impurities weremanaged adequately and
correctly
Variable determination,degree of freedom analysisand management of the
unknown variables
None or not valid dueto absence ofdecisions for input
and/or output
No variable was clearlydetermined, the degree offreedom was totally
wrong or absent. No
discussion in regard todiscriminating and solving
the unknown variables or
the discussion was doneunder wrong bases.
Variables werepartiallydetermined and
wrongly analyzed
through thedegree of freedom
determination. As
a result, thesolutions for the
unknown variablearecompromising.
Variables were alldetermined but wronglyanalyzed through the degree
of freedom determination.
Hence, some of the solutionsare not valid
Variables were adequatelyspecified and were correctlyanalyzed through the degree
of freedom determination.
However, one solution doesnot make sense.
All variables were completelydetermined and were analyzedthrough the degree of freedom.
The unknown variables were
discriminated to a minimumby derivations of related
solution equations such as
reaction conditions, ratios offeeds, instantaneous yields or
selectivity formulas and purityof raw materials.
Level2Decision
Material balancecalculation: stoichiometryand yield calculations for
various conversions
None or not valid dueto absence ofdecisions for input
and/or output
Material balances werecalculated withoutconsidering the variability
of material: misconception
of stoichiometry andyields or the calculationswere done based on a
typical conversion and/oryield from journal withoutany basis or valid
assumption
Material balances calculated were partially correct. The stoichiometry ofcomponents and yields of products are not all valid
Material balances werecalculated based on the resultof the degree of freedom
analysis. These include the
derivation of the equationsfrom balances of extent ofreaction, atom (element), mass
and/or electron valence.Calculations or equationderivations were done
correctly.
X 2
Optimization of theprocess by using the
economic potential
None or not valid dueto absence of
decisions for inputand/or output
Wrong due to the previouserrors or calculation is
based on wrong variable
The economic potential was used to optimize the process route and reactionvariables. However it contains some misconception and the graph shows the
optimum but containing minor errors of format. The marks depend on thepercentage of right answers
The economic potential wasused to optimize the process
route and reaction variables.The graph format is correctand shows the optimum.
-
8/12/2019 App B Rubrics
3/4
-
8/12/2019 App B Rubrics
4/4