app b rubrics

Upload: orange-sky-eyza

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 App B Rubrics

    1/4

    FACULTY OF CHEMICAL & NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING

    CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING I (BKF2453)APPENDIX BREPORT EVALUATION FORM

    GROUP NUMBER :

    PROJECT TITLE :

  • 8/12/2019 App B Rubrics

    2/4

    The following criteria are the bases for evaluating BKF2453 Mini Project report for the module of Conceptual Design on a scale of 0 (very low) to 5 (very high)

    according to the rubrics in the table below.

    All calculations must be shownon clearly; otherwise they

    would not be counted here.

    Score Ranking

    Unacceptable

    (0)

    Minimum Acceptable

    (1)

    Acceptable

    (2)

    Good

    (3)

    Very Good(4)

    Excellent

    (5)Total Score

    Input: impurities

    management

    No impurity

    management

    Raw materials were selected from the available supplies but only some of the impurities were man aged or the

    management is wrong. The marks are based on the percentage of right answer

    Raw materials were selected

    and the impurities weremanaged adequately and

    correctly

    Variable determination,degree of freedom analysisand management of the

    unknown variables

    None or not valid dueto absence ofdecisions for input

    and/or output

    No variable was clearlydetermined, the degree offreedom was totally

    wrong or absent. No

    discussion in regard todiscriminating and solving

    the unknown variables or

    the discussion was doneunder wrong bases.

    Variables werepartiallydetermined and

    wrongly analyzed

    through thedegree of freedom

    determination. As

    a result, thesolutions for the

    unknown variablearecompromising.

    Variables were alldetermined but wronglyanalyzed through the degree

    of freedom determination.

    Hence, some of the solutionsare not valid

    Variables were adequatelyspecified and were correctlyanalyzed through the degree

    of freedom determination.

    However, one solution doesnot make sense.

    All variables were completelydetermined and were analyzedthrough the degree of freedom.

    The unknown variables were

    discriminated to a minimumby derivations of related

    solution equations such as

    reaction conditions, ratios offeeds, instantaneous yields or

    selectivity formulas and purityof raw materials.

    Level2Decision

    Material balancecalculation: stoichiometryand yield calculations for

    various conversions

    None or not valid dueto absence ofdecisions for input

    and/or output

    Material balances werecalculated withoutconsidering the variability

    of material: misconception

    of stoichiometry andyields or the calculationswere done based on a

    typical conversion and/oryield from journal withoutany basis or valid

    assumption

    Material balances calculated were partially correct. The stoichiometry ofcomponents and yields of products are not all valid

    Material balances werecalculated based on the resultof the degree of freedom

    analysis. These include the

    derivation of the equationsfrom balances of extent ofreaction, atom (element), mass

    and/or electron valence.Calculations or equationderivations were done

    correctly.

    X 2

    Optimization of theprocess by using the

    economic potential

    None or not valid dueto absence of

    decisions for inputand/or output

    Wrong due to the previouserrors or calculation is

    based on wrong variable

    The economic potential was used to optimize the process route and reactionvariables. However it contains some misconception and the graph shows the

    optimum but containing minor errors of format. The marks depend on thepercentage of right answers

    The economic potential wasused to optimize the process

    route and reaction variables.The graph format is correctand shows the optimum.

  • 8/12/2019 App B Rubrics

    3/4

  • 8/12/2019 App B Rubrics

    4/4