appendix a - illinois environmental protection agency · appendix a table description page ... udh...

51
Appendix A Table Description Page 1 Volunteer Participation 2 2 Comparing Median Transparency Ranking of Representative Site to Whole-lake 5 3 Lake Statistics 8 4 Trophic State Indexes Based on the Representative Site 13 5a Median Analytical Data from Tier III and III Lakes (S1 only) 16 5b Median Analytical Data for Tier III (Both S1 and WL) 19 6a Data Derived from Median Analytical Results for Tier II and III Lakes (S1 only) 21 6b Data Derived from Median Analytical Results for Tier III (Both S1 and WL) 23 7a Tier III Aquatic Life Assessments (Comparing S1 to WL data) 24 7b Tier II Aquatic Life Assessments 26 7c Tier I Aquatic Life Assessments 28 8a Tier III Aesthetic Quality Assessments (Comparing S1 to WL data) 30 8b Tier II Aesthetic Quality Assessments 32 8c Tier I Aesthetic Quality Assessments 34 9a Total Nitrogen Benchmarks 36 9b Total Phosphorus Benchmarks 36 10 Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution 37 11 Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution, 2007-2013 42 12 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Department of Laboratories Data Qualifiers 48 13 Identifying Potential Sources of Use Impairment in Illinois Freshwater Lakes 49

Upload: hakhuong

Post on 01-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Appendix A

Table Description Page

1 Volunteer Participation 22 Comparing Median Transparency Ranking of Representative Site to Whole-lake 53 Lake Statistics 84 Trophic State Indexes Based on the Representative Site 13

5a Median Analytical Data from Tier III and III Lakes (S1 only) 165b Median Analytical Data for Tier III (Both S1 and WL) 196a Data Derived from Median Analytical Results for Tier II and III Lakes (S1 only) 216b Data Derived from Median Analytical Results for Tier III (Both S1 and WL) 237a Tier III Aquatic Life Assessments (Comparing S1 to WL data) 247b Tier II Aquatic Life Assessments 267c Tier I Aquatic Life Assessments 288a Tier III Aesthetic Quality Assessments (Comparing S1 to WL data) 308b Tier II Aesthetic Quality Assessments 328c Tier I Aesthetic Quality Assessments 349a Total Nitrogen Benchmarks 369b Total Phosphorus Benchmarks 3610 Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution 3711 Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution, 2007-2013 4212 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Department of Laboratories Data Qualifiers 4813 Identifying Potential Sources of Use Impairment in Illinois Freshwater Lakes 49

Appendix A: Table 1Page 2

Volunteer Participation 2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

Oversite

Region

Sample

Events

Volunteer

Hours

RCJ Altamont New/Effingham IEPA 12 44

RTT Antioch/Lake LCHD 11 16.5

RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess IEPA 10 64

RTG Bangs/Lake LCHD 9 17

RTZT Barrington/Lake LCHD 12 23

RPJ Bass/Lee IEPA 11 14.5

RDW Beaver/Grundy IEPA 9 18

REZG Bertinetti/Christian IEPA 12 42

SEB Bird's Pond/Sangamon IEPA 10 23.5

RPK Black Oak/Lee IEPA 11 8

RDO Bloomgington/McLean IEPA 12 43

RCB Borah/Richland IEPA 2 2

SGC Buffalo Creek/Lake LCHD 10 62

STJ Campton/Kane CMAP 2 4

RNZH Campus/Jackson GERPDC 11 24

RPV Candlewick/Boone IEPA 9 48.5

RDD Canton/Fulton IEPA 3 28

RNI Carbondale/Jackson GERPDC 11 24

RTD Catherine/Lake LCHD 2 4

RNE Cedar/Jackson GERPDC 12 95

RTI Channel/Lake LCHD 2 6

RGR Charles/DuPage CMAP 10 42.25

RBC Charleston SCR/Coles IEPA 11 73

VTZ Charlotte/Kane CMAP 8 18

SNA Chautauqua/Jackson GERPDC 10 10

WDK Civic/Grundy IEPA 10 57

RGQ Countryside/Lake LCHD 9 27.5

RGZA Crooked/Lake LCHD 2 2

VTZH Crystal/McHenry CMAP 4 13

REE Dawson/McLean IEPA 11 25.5

REA Decatur/Macon IEPA 5 18

WGZK Deep Quarry/DuPage CMAP 11 32

VTD Deep/Lake LCHD 10 36

RNJ Devil's Kitchen/Williamson GERPDC 9 36

RGB Diamond/Lake LCHD 6 13

RGV Druce/Lake LCHD 10 25.5

RTZG Duck/Lake LCHD 7 27

RTM East Loon/Lake LCHD 4 15

SDS Eureka/Woodford IEPA 2 2

SDA Evergreen/McLean IEPA 11 40

VTT Fischer/Lake LCHD 12 62

RMF Fish Trap/Jo Daviess IEPA 3 12

RGZG Forest/Lake LCHD 11 24

RGZC Fourth/Lake LCHD 11 35

RLH Fyre/Mercer IEPA 7 7

RGI Gages/Lake LCHD 10 21

Appendix A: Table 1Page 3

Volunteer Participation 2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

Oversite

Region

Sample

Events

Volunteer

Hours

RMM Galena/Jo Daviess IEPA 12 69.5

RJZK Gamlin/St. Clair IEPA 5 5

RTZS Goose/McHenry CMAP 8 30

ROP Governor Bond/Bond IEPA 4 11

RTQ Grass/Lake LCHD 4 8

RGK Grays/Lake LCHD 6 9

RAI Harrisburg/Williamson GERPDC 1 1

RNZC Herrin New/Williamson GERPDC 7 16

RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson GERPDC 5 33

ROZA Highland Silver/Madison IEPA 5 16.5

RBO Homer/Champaign IEPA 10 21.5

RTZU Honey/Lake LCHD 8 26

WGZY Indian/Cook CMAP 11 28

RTZI Island/Lake LCHD 1 5

RDI Jacksonville/Morgan IEPA 11 25.5

RNU Jaycee/Jefferson GERPDC 7 7.5

RTZV Joliet Jr College/Will CMAP 3 4.5

RTZV Killarney/McHenry CMAP 11 52

RNC Kincaid/Jackson GERPDC 12 24

STM La Fox Pond/Kane CMAP 12 36

RAL Lake of Egypt/Williamson GERPDC 12 86

UTZ Lake of the Hollows/ CMAP 1 1.5

REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign IEPA 11 25

STG Leisure/Lake LCHD 4 6

VGI Leopold/Lake LCHD 11 14.5

UDC Lincoln/Grundy IEPA 9 17

RGC Linden/Lake LCHD 5 4.75

STC Little Silver/Lake LCHD 12 12

RGU Loch Lomond/Lake LCHD 10 50

RTJ Long/Lake LCHD 10 21

RHZK Longmeadow/Cook CMAP 9 38

VTZJ Louise/Lake LCHD 4 5

WGZZ Loveless/DuPage CMAP 4 4

RCF Mattoon/Shelby IEPA 5 40

SDL Mauvaiseterre/Morgan IEPA 11 20.5

RAZA McLeansboro New/Hamilton GERPDC 2 2

RNZI Miller/Jefferson GERPDC 11 107

RGZD Miltmore/Lake LCHD 11 62

RGP Minear/Lake LCHD 7 21

RND Murphysboro/Jackson GERPDC 12 6

STO Napa Suwe/Lake LCHD 12 45

RNZO New Thompson/Jackson GERPDC 9 9

RTUA Nippersink/Lake LCHD 8 10

RCC Olney East Fork/Richland IEPA 2 2

SDZW Ossami/Tazewell IEPA 9 36.5

RDF Otter/MaCoupin IEPA 10 42

Appendix A: Table 1Page 4

Volunteer Participation 2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

Oversite

Region

Sample

Events

Volunteer

Hours

RCG Paradise/Coles IEPA 5 40

RBL Paris Twin East/Edgar IEPA 7 16

RBX Paris Twin West/Edgar IEPA 8 16

REL Petersburg/Menard IEPA 9 16

RPC Pierce/Winnebago IEPA 6 18

RHN Pinckneyville/Perry GERPDC 4 8

RPZB Pine/Lee IEPA 11 9.5

RPZI Richardson Wildlife/Lee IEPA 12 18

RTH Round/Lake LCHD 8 9

RGM Sand/Lake LCHD 6 4.75

RCE Sara/Effingham IEPA 11 92

RTW Silver/McHenry CMAP 13 59.5

RNZG Spring Arbor/Jackson GERPDC 12 12

UGV Spring Ledge/Lake LCHD 8 8

RDR Spring/McDonough IEPA 12 114

REF Springfield/Sangamon IEPA 12 86

SGW Stephen/Will CMAP 3 8

RPI Summerset/Winnebago IEPA 9 33

REZN Sunset/Champaign IEPA 11 19

RPL Sunset/Lee IEPA 10 6

UDH Sunset/MaCoupin IEPA 1 5

RGZF Sylvan/Lake LCHD 8 28.5

REC Taylorville/Christian IEPA 3 16

RGW Third/Lake LCHD 9 36

WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry CMAP 8 31

WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry CMAP 8 42

RTZQ Timber/Lake LCHD 3 4.5

RTZF Tower/Lake LCHD 4 8

REZL Twin Oaks/Champaign IEPA 11 18.5

RGZM Valley/Lake LCHD 12 25

RBD Vermilion/Vermilion IEPA 6 37

RCA Vernor/Richland IEPA 2 2

SGB Virginia/Cook CMAP 12 16

WGS Waterford/Lake LCHD 16 52.75

RTZB West Loon/Lake LCHD 2 8

RPZK Westlake/Winnebago IEPA 9 8

RTZC Wonder/McHenry CMAP 8 15

RPM Woodhaven/Lee IEPA 16 19.5

RTZZ Woods Creek/McHenry CMAP 9 36.5

RTS Zurich/Lake LCHD 12 25

1,077 3,428.5

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAP 155 511.25

Greater Egypt Regional Planning and Development Commission GERPDC 147 500.5

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency IEPA 436 1491.5

Lake County Health Department LCHD 339 925.25

Appendix A: Table 2Page 5

Comparing Median Transparency Ranking of Representative Site (S1) to Whole-lake (WL)

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

WL SD

(in)

S1 SD

(in)

%

ChangeWL Trophic State S1 Trophic State

RCJ Altamont New/Effingham 35 39.5 11.4 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTT Antioch/Lake 62 62 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 35 35.5 1.4 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTG Bangs/Lake 105 108 2.8 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RTZT Barrington/Lake 48 51 5.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RPJ Bass/Lee 29.5 28 (5.4) Eutrophic Eutrophic

RDW Beaver/Grundy 108 114 5.3 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

REZG Bertinetti/Christian 18.5 20 7.5 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

SEB Bird's Pond/Sangamon 33.5 34 1.5 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RPK Black Oak/Lee 24 25.5 5.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RDO Bloomgington/McLean 24 26 7.7 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RCB Borah/Richland 16.5 22 25.0 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

SGC Buffalo Creek/Lake 22 18 (22.2) Eutrophic Hypereutrophic

STJ Campton/Kane 14 16 12.5 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RNZH Campus/Jackson 30.5 30.5 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RPV Candlewick/Boone 36 40 10.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RDD Canton/Fulton 46 63 27.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RNI Carbondale/Jackson 8 8.5 5.9 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RTD Catherine/Lake 28 30.5 8.2 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RNE Cedar/Jackson 50 50 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTI Channel/Lake 25 25 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGR Charles/DuPage 30.5 31 1.6 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 17 17 0.0 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

VTZ Charlotte/Kane 58 126 54.0 Eutrophic Mesotrophic

SNA Chautauqua/Jackson 20 24 16.7 Eutrophic Eutrophic

WDK Civic/Grundy 446 443.5 (0.6) Oligotrophic Oligotrophic

RGQ Countryside/Lake 35 38 7.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGZA Crooked/Lake 26 26.5 1.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

VTZH Crystal/McHenry 115.5 127.5 9.4 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

REE Dawson/McLean 39 57 31.6 Eutrophic Eutrophic

REA Decatur/Macon 15.5 19 18.4 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

WGZK Deep Quarry/DuPage 269 272 1.1 Oligotrophic Oligotrophic

VTD Deep/Lake 168.5 175 3.7 Oligotrophic Oligotrophic

RNJ Devil's Kitchen/Williamson 120 120 0.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RGB Diamond/Lake 67 69 2.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGV Druce/Lake 154.5 154.5 0.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RTZG Duck/Lake 46 50 8.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTM East Loon/Lake 36.5 32.5 (12.3) Eutrophic Eutrophic

SDS Eureka/Woodford 19 22 13.6 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

SDA Evergreen/McLean 25 36 30.6 Eutrophic Eutrophic

VTT Fischer/Lake 19 22 13.6 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

RMF Fish Trap/Jo Daviess 8 10 20.0 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RGZG Forest/Lake 28 29 3.4 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGZC Fourth/Lake 36 36 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RLH Fyre/Mercer 65 66 1.5 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGI Gages/Lake 64.5 76.5 15.7 Eutrophic Eutrophic

Appendix A: Table 2Page 6

Comparing Median Transparency Ranking of Representative Site (S1) to Whole-lake (WL)

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

WL SD

(in)

S1 SD

(in)

%

ChangeWL Trophic State S1 Trophic State

RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 42.5 43.5 2.3 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RJZK Gamlin/St. Clair 34 32 (6.3) Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTZS Goose/McHenry 36 39 7.7 Eutrophic Eutrophic

ROP Governor Bond/Bond 15 17.5 14.3 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RTQ Grass/Lake 17 15.5 (9.7) Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RGK Grays/Lake 42 42 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RAI Harrisburg/Williamson 18 18 0.0 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RNZC Herrin New/Williamson 34 36 5.6 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 48 48 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

ROZA Highland Silver/Madison 8 18 55.6 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RBO Homer/Champaign 26.5 32.5 18.5 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTZU Honey/Lake 56 55 (1.8) Eutrophic Eutrophic

WGZY Indian/Cook 60 60 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTZI Island/Lake 20.5 20 (2.5) Eutrophic Eutrophic

RDI Jacksonville/Morgan 26 36 27.8 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RNU Jaycee/Jefferson 41 41 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

WGZX Joliet Jr College/Will 40 58 31.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTZV Killarney/McHenry 101 101 0.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RNC Kincaid/Jackson 62.5 69 9.4 Eutrophic Eutrophic

STM La Fox Pond/Kane 36 36 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RAL Lake of Egypt/Williamson 54 53 (1.9) Eutrophic Eutrophic

UTZ Lake of the Hollows/Lake 99 100 1.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 25 26 3.8 Eutrophic Eutrophic

STG Leisure/Lake 24 20 (20.0) Eutrophic Eutrophic

VGI Leopold/Lake 87 108 19.4 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

UDC Lincoln/Grundy 270 342 21.1 Oligotrophic Oligotrophic

RGC Linden/Lake 46 60 23.3 Eutrophic Eutrophic

STC Little Silver/Lake 96 102 5.9 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RGU Loch Lomond/Lake 24 25 4.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTJ Long/Lake 31 31 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RHZK Longmeadow/Cook 33 40 17.5 Eutrophic Eutrophic

VTZJ Louise/Lake 10.5 12.5 16.0 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

WGZZ Loveless/DuPage 17 17.5 2.9 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RCF Mattoon/Shelby 12 14 14.3 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

SDL Mauvaiseterre/Morgan 9 12 25.0 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RAZA McLeansboro New/Hamilton 16 18 11.1 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RNZI Miller/Jefferson 24 28 14.3 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGZD Miltmore/Lake 96 99 3.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RGP Minear/Lake 108 108 0.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RND Murphysboro/Jackson 24.5 24.5 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

STO Napa Suwe/Lake 8.5 8.5 0.0 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RNZO New Thompson/Jackson 42 39 (7.7) Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTUA Nippersink/Lake 16.5 17 2.9 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RCC Olney East Fork/Richland 28 40 30.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

SDZW Ossami/Tazewell 28 36 22.2 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RDF Otter/MaCoupin 17.5 23 23.9 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

Appendix A: Table 2Page 7

Comparing Median Transparency Ranking of Representative Site (S1) to Whole-lake (WL)

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

WL SD

(in)

S1 SD

(in)

%

ChangeWL Trophic State S1 Trophic State

RCG Paradise/Coles 12 13 7.7 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RBL Paris Twin East/Edgar 18 23 21.7 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

RBX Paris Twin West/Edgar 16 16.5 3.0 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

REL Petersburg/Menard 64 64 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RPC Pierce/Winnebago 18 13.5 (33.3) Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RNH Pinckneyville/Perry 32.5 33.5 3.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RPZB Pine/Lee 39.5 39.5 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RPZI Richardson Wildlife/Lee 27 26.5 (1.9) Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTH Round/Lake 60 71 15.5 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGM Sand/Lake 26.5 27 1.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RCE Sara/Effingham 32 36 11.1 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTW Silver/McHenry 66 88 25.0 Eutrophic Mesotrophic

RNZG Spring Arbor/Jackson 63.5 67 5.2 Eutrophic Eutrophic

UGV Spring Ledge/Lake 72 78.5 8.3 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RDR Spring/McDonough 15 20 25.0 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

REF Springfield/Sangamon 13 20.5 36.6 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

SGW Stephen/Will 47 45 (4.4) Eutrophic Eutrophic

RPI Summerset/Winnebago 38 62 38.7 Eutrophic Eutrophic

REZN Sunset/Champaign 76 84 9.5 Eutrophic Mesotrophic

RPL Sunset/Lee 33 34 2.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

UDH Sunset/MaCoupin 25 25 0.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RGZF Sylvan/Lake 33 34.5 4.3 Eutrophic Eutrophic

REC Taylorville/Christian 12 24 50.0 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

RGW Third/Lake 85 87 2.3 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 168 208.5 19.4 Oligotrophic Oligotrophic

WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 260 290.5 10.5 Oligotrophic Oligotrophic

RTZQ Timber/Lake 48.5 50 3.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTZF Tower/Lake 30 29 (3.4) Eutrophic Eutrophic

REZL Twin Oaks/Champaign 10 11 9.1 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RGZM Valley/Lake 35 36.5 4.1 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RBD Vermilion/Vermilion 18 26.5 32.1 Hypereutrophic Eutrophic

RCA Vernor/Richland 46 50 8.0 Eutrophic Eutrophic

SGB Virginia/Cook 225 236 4.7 Oligotrophic Oligotrophic

WGS Waterford/Lake 72 108 33.3 Eutrophic Mesotrophic

RTZB West Loon/Lake 114 114 0.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

RPZK Westlake/Winnebago 32 34 5.9 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTZC Wonder/McHenry 16 17.5 8.6 Hypereutrophic Hypereutrophic

RPM Woodhaven/Lee 43 42 (2.4) Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTZZ Woods Creek/McHenry 35 39 10.3 Eutrophic Eutrophic

RTS Zurich/Lake 90 90 0.0 Mesotrophic Mesotrophic

TSI Oligotrophic - Greater than 158 inches

TSI Mesotrophic - 79 to 158 inches

TSI Eutrophic - 19.7 to 79 inches

TSI Hypereutrophic - less than 19.7 inches

Appendix A: Table 3Page 8

Lake Statistics 2013 VLMP Report

Lake/County Lat Lon BasinWatershed

(HUCS)Watershed Name

Lake

Area

W/shed

Area

Max

Depth

Ave

Depth

Owner-

shipAccess

Lake

Type

Altamont New/Effingham 39.031948 -88.714726 31 05120114 Little and Lower Wabash 57 620 30 17 Public Yes I

Antioch/Lake 42.467781 -88.098059 3 07120006 Upper Fox 85 125 9 5 Multiple No I

Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 42.417100 -90.164100 9 07060005 Mississippi North 450 13,000 60 15 Private No I

Bangs/Lake 42.265281 -88.132227 3 07120006 Upper Fox 306 960 32 14 Public Yes G

Barrington/Lake 42.221700 -88.147100 3 07120006 Upper Fox 95 172 13 7 Private No I

Bass/Lee 41.654400 -89.287300 8 07090007 Green 26 1,895 14 7 Private No I

Beaver/Grundy 41.336800 -88.317300 11 07120005 Upper Illinois 80 19,276 21 3 Private No Q

Bertinetti/Christian 39.533297 -89.251344 20 07130007 Lower Sangamon 55 4,400 18 Private No I

Bird's Pond/Sangamon 39.747067 -89.565557 20 07130007 Lower Sangamon 3 16 Private No P

Black Oak/Lee 41.657500 -89.289500 8 07090007 Green 6 2,240 8 4 Private No P

Bloomington/McLean 40.660567 -88.935553 14 07130004 Mackinaw 635 45,400 35 14 Public Yes I

Borah/Richland 38.774390 -88.069800 31 05120114 Little and Lower Wabash 137 2,154 25 11 Public Yes I

Buffalo Creek/Lake 42.156979 -87.991331 2 07120004 Des Plaines 35 10,304 6 4 Public Yes I

Campton/Kane 41.952936 -88.410869 3 07120007 Upper Fox 32 3,850 9 3 Private No I

Campus/Jackson 37.708892 -89.223059 26 07140106 Big Muddy 40 384 17 8 Public Yes I

Candlewick/Boone 42.348700 -88.865700 5 07090006 Kishwaukee 200 2,100 30 15 Private No I

Canton/Fulton 40.564200 -89.973560 13 07130003 Middle Illinois 250 9,728 33 13 Private No I

Carbondale/Jackson 37.698892 -89.223615 26 07140106 Big Muddy 133 1,920 11 3 Public Yes I

Catherine/Lake 42.485838 -88.128337 3 07120006 Upper Fox 165 766,146 35 17 Multiple Yes G

Cedar/Jackson 37.666115 -89.280560 26 07140106 Big Muddy 1,800 19,330 45 23 Multiple Yes I

Channel/Lake 42.486392 -88.137503 3 07120006 Upper Fox 337 766,146 36 14 Public Yes G

Charles/DuPage 41.815560 -87.958059 2 07120004 Des Plaines 16 450 20 9 Private No I

Charleston SCR/Coles 39.470281 -88.143616 30 05120112 Embarras/Middle Wabash 339 1,132 15 10 Public Yes I

Charlotte/Kane 41.915560 -88.370480 3 07120007 Upper Fox 2 Private No P

Chautauqua/Jackson 37.726300 -89.302200 26 07140106 Big Muddy 88 1,249 40 20 Private No I

Civic/Grundy 41.310278 -88.284441 11 07120005 Upper Illinois 390 73 35 Private No Q

Countryside/Lake 42.253006 -88.044047 2 07120004 Des Plaines 140 900 10 6 Private No I

Crooked/Lake 42.422503 -88.051670 2 07120004 Des Plaines 140 1,260 26.5 11 Multiple Yes G

Crystal/McHenry 42.233436 -88.354408 3 07120006 Upper Fox 230 3,072 46 14 Multiple No G

Dawson/McLean 40.403610 -88.722810 22 07130009 Salt Creek 148 2,830 10 Public Yes I

Appendix A: Table 3Page 9

Lake Statistics 2013 VLMP Report

Lake/County Lat Lon BasinWatershed

(HUCS)Watershed Name

Lake

Area

W/shed

Area

Max

Depth

Ave

Depth

Owner-

shipAccess

Lake

Type

Decatur/Macon 39.824449 -88.952504 21 07130006 Upper Sangamon 3,072 592,000 20 8 Public Yes I

Deep Quarry/DuPage 41.939727 -88.178615 2 07120004 Des Plaines 37 65 45 18 Public Yes Q

Deep/Lake 42.428337 -88.066889 3 07120006 Upper Fox 226 592 48 18 Multiple Yes G

Devils Kitchen/Williamson 37.641948 -89.105560 26 07140106 Big Muddy 810 11,700 100 36 Public Yes I

Diamond/Lake 42.250230 -88.007290 2 07120004 Des Plaines 154 400 25 9 Multiple Yes G

Druce/Lake 42.366900 -88.005000 2 07120004 Des Plaines 88 1,333 32 9 Multiple No G

Duck/Lake 42.376115 -88.121393 3 07120006 Upper Fox 93 4,000 9 4 Multiple Yes G

East Loon/Lake 42.453337 -88.073337 3 07120006 Upper Fox 178 5,259 24 11 Multiple Yes G

Eureka/Woodford 40.705003 -89.277505 14 07130004 Mackinaw 35 1,700 18 10 Public Yes I

Evergreen/McLean 40.648770 -89.054650 14 07130004 Mackinaw 700 25,600 48 17 Public Yes I

Fischer/Lake 42.358059 -88.157503 11 07120005 Upper Illinois 23 2,150 11 3 Multiple Yes I

Fish Trap/Jo Daviess 42.382781 -90.467781 9 07060005 Mississippi North 285 358 8 3 Public Yes R

Forest/Lake 42.213038 -88.054505 2 07120004 Des Plaines 40 430 9 5 Private No I

Fourth/Lake 42.392098 -88.031469 2 07120004 Des Plaines 305 840 6 3 Multiple Yes G

Fyre/Mercer 41.296000 -90.488400 16 07080104 Mississippi North Central 150 1,082 38 20 Private No I

Gages/Lake 42.351380 -87.999440 2 07120004 Des Plaines 143 1,280 52 8 Multiple Yes G

Galena/Jo Daviess 42.400400 -90.349200 9 07060005 Mississippi North 220 10,340 60 20 Multiple No I

Gamlin/St. Clair 38.598500 -90.019600 27 07140101 Mississippi South Central 3 26 8 Private No P

Goose/McHenry 42.179900 -88.311600 3 07120006 Upper Fox 11 6,200 16 7 Public Yes Q

Governor Bond/Bond 38.925940 -89.399040 24 07140203 Middle Kaskaskia 775 22,080 25 13 Public Yes I

Grass/Lake 42.430559 -88.163337 3 07120006 Upper Fox 1,360 766,146 3 Multiple Yes G

Grays/Lake 42.342200 -88.048000 3 07120006 Upper Fox 80 400 18 7 Public Yes G

Harrisburg/Saline 37.835837 -88.590005 32 05140204 Saline 209 3,456 30 10 Multiple Yes I

Herrin New/Williamson 37.635800 -89.014460 26 07140106 Big Muddy 46 2,200 26 8 Public Yes I

Herrin Old/Williamson 37.763059 -89.035559 26 07140106 Big Muddy 51 1,140 14 5 Public Yes I

Highland Silver/Madison 38.766010 -89.698390 25 07140204 Lower Kaskaskia 600 30,144 20 12 Public Yes I

Homer/Champaign 40.060210 -87.984840 29 05120109 Vermilion (Wabash Basin) 102 9,280 21 11 Public Yes I

Honey/Lake 42.200600 -88.130100 3 07120006 Upper Fox 66 590 19 9 Private No G

Indian/Cook 41.832781 -87.840005 2 07120004 Des Plaines 4 15 13 7 Public Yes P

Island/Lake 42.275281 -88.200838 3 07120006 Upper Fox 76 6,972 9 5 Public Yes I

Appendix A: Table 3Page 10

Lake Statistics 2013 VLMP Report

Lake/County Lat Lon BasinWatershed

(HUCS)Watershed Name

Lake

Area

W/shed

Area

Max

Depth

Ave

Depth

Owner-

shipAccess

Lake

Type

Jacksonville/Morgan 39.672503 -90.212226 18 07130011 Lower Illinois/Macoupin 477 6,880 36 13 Public Yes I

Jaycee/Jefferson 38.370281 -88.898617 26 07140106 Big Muddy 115 1,670 20 Public Yes I

Joliet Jr. College/Will 41.500900 -88.185000 2 07120004 Des Plaines 11 300 10 6 Public Yes G

Killarney/McHenry 42.239450 -88.257290 3 07120006 Upper Fox 80 1,500 22 6 Private No G

Kinkaid/Jackson 37.778836 -89.449500 26 07140106 Big Muddy 2,750 42,336 89 29 Multiple Yes I

La Fox Pond/Kane 41.871560 -88.436560 3 07120007 Upper Fox 4 10 7 Private No P

Lake of Egypt/Williamson 37.620837 -88.943338 32 05140204 Saline 3,500 18,540 45 19 Public Yes I

Lake of the Hollow/Lake 42.365562 -88.183950 3 07120006 Upper Fox 75 1,008 15 7.5 Private No G

Lake of the Woods/Champaign 40.200559 -88.381671 21 07130006 Upper Sangamon 23 612 22 10 Public Yes I

Leisure/Lake 42.436200 -88.185900 2 07120004 Des Plaines 12 9 7 Private No I

Leopold/Lake 42.327082 -88.011318 2 07120004 Des Plaines 28 1,439 16 5 Private No I

Lincoln/Grundy 41.317348 -88.315116 11 07120005 Upper Illinois 112 65 25 Private No Q

Linden/Lake 42.420837 -88.028338 2 07120004 Des Plaines 31 80 11 5 Multiple Yes I

Little Silver/Lake 42.473400 -88.074800 3 07120006 Upper Fox 45 639 25 18 Multiple No G

Loch Lomond/Lake 42.280600 -88.005100 2 07120004 Des Plaines 75 1,439 8 5 Private No I

Long/Lake 42.377781 -88.126115 3 07120006 Upper Fox 393 27,008 30 13 Multiple No G

Longmeadow/Cook 42.086309 -87.752877 1 07120003 Chicago/Calumet 2 18 Multiple No P

Louise/Lake 42.160255 -88.114906 3 07120006 Upper Fox 38 17,664 10 5 Private No I

Loveless/DuPage 41.889110 -88.187290 2 07120004 Des Plaines 2 5 Multiple No P

Mattoon/Shelby 39.334730 -88.482480 31 05120114 Little and Lower Wabash 765 25,650 35 10 Public Yes I

Mauvaise Terre/Morgan 39.720003 -90.214448 18 07130011 Lower Illinois/Macoupin 172 20,851 8 5 Public Yes I

McLeansboro New/Hamilton 38.084448 -88.553337 32 05140204 Saline 75 935 20 10 Public Yes I

Miller/Jefferson 38.396656 -88.892390 26 07140106 Big Muddy 131 2,976 22 Private No I

Miltmore/Lake 42.396110 -88.041667 2 07120004 Des Plaines 84 94 21 10 Multiple No G

Minear/Lake 42.290317 -87.941458 2 07120004 Des Plaines 75 85 23 10 Multiple Yes Q

Murphysboro/Jackson 37.773615 -89.380559 26 07140106 Big Muddy 145 1,722 32 14 Public Yes I

Napa Suwe/Lake 42.287042 -88.124777 3 07120006 Upper Fox 61 960 5 3 Multiple No G

New Thompson/Jackson 37.744167 -89.254722 26 07140106 Big Muddy 19 75 25 10 Private No I

Nippersink/Lake 42.413060 -88.180559 3 07120006 Upper Fox 420 766,146 3 Multiple Yes G

Olney East Fork/Richland 38.761670 -88.076710 31 05120114 Little and Lower Wabash 935 9,982 40 15 Public Yes I

Appendix A: Table 3Page 11

Lake Statistics 2013 VLMP Report

Lake/County Lat Lon BasinWatershed

(HUCS)Watershed Name

Lake

Area

W/shed

Area

Max

Depth

Ave

Depth

Owner-

shipAccess

Lake

Type

Ossami/Tazewell 40.635586 -89.468316 11 07130001 Upper Illinois 5 9 Private No P

Otter/Macoupin 39.408900 -89.911990 18 07130012 Lower Illinois/Macoupin 760 12,992 80 21 Public Yes I

Paradise/Coles 39.413120 -88.439630 31 05120114 Little and Lower Wabash 166 11,580 23 9 Public Yes I

Paris Twin East/Edgar 39.630220 -87.677710 30 05120111 Embarras/Middle Wabash 163 12,800 27 10 Public Yes I

Paris Twin West/Edgar 39.635930 -87.694100 30 05120111 Embarras/Middle Wabash 25 11,264 9 3 Public Yes I

Petersburg/Menard 39.988600 -89.850100 20 07130008 Lower Sangamon 191 1,460 65 24 Private No I

Pierce/Winnebago 42.345330 -88.985100 6 07090005 Rock 162 8,150 36 12 Public Yes I

Pinckneyville/Perry 38.096670 -89.396671 26 07140106 Big Muddy 250 3,051 20 12 Public Yes G

Pine/Lee 41.651800 -89.309500 8 07090007 Green 3 352 20 11 Private No P

Richardson Wildlife/Lee 41.715388 -89.188098 8 07090007 Green 12 40 9 6 Public Yes I

Round/Lake 42.361671 -88.076671 3 07120006 Upper Fox 229 1,602 32 8 Multiple Yes G

Sand/Lake 42.412503 -88.043337 2 07120004 Des Plaines 115 229 33 10 Multiple Yes G

Sara/Effingham 39.126200 -88.618670 31 05120114 Little and Lower Wabash 586 7,560 53 20 Public Yes I

Silver/McHenry 42.246650 -88.247460 3 07120006 Upper Fox 42 1,600 18 9 Public Yes I

Spring Arbor/Jackson 37.650281 -89.168893 26 07140106 Big Muddy 100 500 48 12 Private No I

Spring Ledge/Lake 42.423260 -88.020624 2 07120004 Des Plaines 3 9 Multiple Yes P

Spring/McDonough 40.506660 -90.717570 17 07130010 La Moine 5 12,928 20 10 Public Yes I

Springfield/Sangamon 39.756115 -89.593616 20 07130007 Lower Sangamon 4,200 165,366 26 13 Public Yes I

Stephen/Will 41.566400 -88.225981 2 07120004 Des Plaines 1 Private No P

Summerset/Winnebago 42.448600 -89.384900 7 07090004 Pecatonica 285 4,500 40 18 Private No I

Sunset/Champaign 40.181900 -88.423200 21 07130006 Upper Sangamon 89 393 60 Public Yes Q

Sunset/Lee 41.647900 -89.293700 8 07090007 Green 7 300 10 6 Private No P

Sunset/Macoupin 39.436400 -89.855400 18 07130012 Lower Illinois/Macoupin 149 2,800 37 12 Multiple No I

Sylvan/Lake 42.242147 -88.046133 2 07120004 Des Plaines 39 1,039 12 8 Multiple No I

Taylorville/Christian 39.529448 -89.255838 20 07130007 Lower Sangamon 1,148 84,032 30 7 Public Yes I

Third/Lake 42.370837 -88.014448 2 07120004 Des Plaines 157 7,680 70 19 Public Yes G

Three Oaks North/McHenry 42.223601 -88.302678 3 07120006 Upper Fox 33 40 23 Public Yes Q

Three Oaks South/McHenry 42.215852 -88.305410 3 07120006 Upper Fox 282 41 19 Public Yes Q

Timber/Lake 42.240281 -88.127503 3 07120006 Upper Fox 32 450 15 8 Private No G

Tower/Lake 42.228185 -88.152374 3 07120006 Upper Fox 69 1,500 8 5 Private No I

Appendix A: Table 3Page 12

Lake Statistics 2013 VLMP Report

Lake/County Lat Lon BasinWatershed

(HUCS)Watershed Name

Lake

Area

W/shed

Area

Max

Depth

Ave

Depth

Owner-

shipAccess

Lake

Type

Twin Oaks/Champaign 40.213760 -88.375433 21 07130006 Upper Sangamon 9 195 5 3 Private No I

Valley/Lake 42.349920 -87.982673 2 07120004 Des Plaines 12 117 10 5 Multiple Yes I

Vermilion/Vermilion 40.157400 -87.649100 29 05120109 Vermilion (Wabash Basin) 608 200,006 27 8 Multiple Yes I

Vernor/Richland 38.763790 -88.102500 31 05120114 Little and Lower Wabash 36 300 45 15 Public Yes I

Virginia/Cook 42.146100 -87.945000 2 07120004 Des Plaines 6 50 65 35 Private No P

Waterford/Lake 42.427200 -88.026400 2 07120004 Des Plaines 67 100 13 6 Multiple Yes I

West Loon/Lake 42.452781 -88.083338 3 07120006 Upper Fox 168 3,760 40 16 Private No G

Westlake/Winnebago 42.316337 -89.284705 7 07090003 Pecatonica 82 Private No I

Wonder/McHenry 42.375005 -88.354727 3 07120006 Upper Fox 830 62,270 12 5 Private No I

Woodhaven/Lee 41.656600 -89.306100 8 07090007 Green 27 630 30 9 Private No I

Woods Creek/McHenry 42.180490 -88.318880 3 07120006 Upper Fox 56 6,190 26 16 Public Yes I

Zurich/Lake 42.195003 -88.098337 3 07120006 Upper Fox 250 1,240 32 11 Multiple Yes G

38,477

Lake Type Count

Glacial 30

Impoundment 78

Pond 14

Quarry 9

Riverine 1

Total 132

Appendix A: Table 4Page 13

Trophic State Indexes Based on the Representative Site

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County TSI

SDTSI

TPTSI

CHL Trophic State TSITN Lat Lon

RCJ Altamont New/Effingham 60.0 76.6 58.2 Eutrophic 54.3 39.031948 -88.714726

RTT Antioch/Lake 53.5 Eutrophic 42.467781 -88.098059

RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 61.5 59.4 67.4 Eutrophic 55.6 42.417100 -90.164100

RTG Bangs/Lake 45.5 Mesotrophic 42.265281 -88.132227

RTZT Barrington/Lake 56.3 Eutrophic 42.221700 -88.147100

RPJ Bass/Lee 64.9 68.4 68.9 Eutrophic 71.1 41.654400 -89.287300

RDW Beaver/Grundy 44.7 Mesotrophic 41.336800 -88.317300

REZG Bertinetti/Christian 69.8 75.2 69.7 Eutrophic 66.7 39.533297 -89.251344

SEB Bird's Pond/Sangamon 62.1 67.8 58.8 Eutrophic 51.7 39.747067 -89.565557

RPK Black Oak/Lee 66.3 Eutrophic 41.657500 -89.289500

RDO Bloomington/McLean 66.0 68.4 70.6 Eutrophic 82.3 40.660567 -88.935553

RCB Borah/Richland 68.4 69.2 27.9 Eutrophic 60.0 38.774390 -88.069800

SGC Buffalo Creek/Lake 71.3 67.2 59.6 Eutrophic 55.4 42.156979 -87.991331

STJ Campton/Kane 73.0 Hypereutrophic 41.952936 -88.410869

RNZH Campus/Jackson 63.7 Eutrophic 37.708892 -89.223059

RPV Candlewick/Boone 59.8 59.8 63.1 Eutrophic 52.5 42.348700 -88.865700

RDD Canton/Fulton 53.2 58.6 57.0 Eutrophic 78.0 40.564200 -89.973560

RNI Carbondale/Jackson 82.1 67.6 Eutrophic 58.3 37.698892 -89.223615

RTD Catherine/Lake 63.7 Eutrophic 42.485838 -88.128337

RNE Cedar/Jackson 56.6 44.1 51.3 Eutrophic 49.8 37.666115 -89.280560

RTI Channel/Lake 66.5 Eutrophic 42.486392 -88.137503

RGR Charles/DuPage 63.4 82.5 64.5 Eutrophic 58.2 41.815560 -87.958059

RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 72.1 70.4 72.4 Hypereutrophic 61.1 39.470281 -88.143616

VTZ Charlotte/Kane 43.2 Mesotrophic 41.915560 -88.370480

SNA Chautauqua/Jackson 67.1 Eutrophic 37.726300 -89.302200

WDK Civic/Grundy 25.1 27.4 36.3 Oligotrophic 38.8 41.310278 -88.284441

RGQ Countryside/Lake 60.5 Eutrophic 42.253006 -88.044047

RGZA Crooked/Lake 65.7 Eutrophic 42.422503 -88.051670

VTZH Crystal/McHenry 43.1 44.1 57.9 Mesotrophic 51.4 42.233436 -88.354408

REE Dawson/McLean 54.7 50.9 62.5 Eutrophic 72.4 40.403610 -88.722810

REA Decatur/Macon 70.5 71.7 67.0 Hypereutrophic 88.7 39.824449 -88.952504

WGZK Deep Quarry/DuPage 32.2 38.7 40.2 Oligotrophic 38.3 41.939727 -88.178615

VTD Deep/Lake 38.5 46.6 48.5 Mesotrophic 49.3 42.428337 -88.066889

RNJ Devils Kitchen/Williamson 44.0 37.4 Oligotrophic 38.1 37.641948 -89.105560

RGB Diamond/Lake 51.9 54.3 49.6 Eutrophic 50.8 42.250230 -88.007290

RGV Druce/Lake 40.3 37.4 47.5 Mesotrophic 45.7 42.366900 -88.005000

RTZG Duck/Lake 56.6 Eutrophic 42.376115 -88.121393

RTM East Loon/Lake 62.8 Eutrophic 42.453337 -88.073337

SDS Eureka/Woodford 68.4 Eutrophic 40.705003 -89.277505

SDA Evergreen/McLean 61.3 56.4 59.4 Eutrophic 80.3 40.648770 -89.054650

VTT Fischer/Lake 68.4 75.0 68.0 Eutrophic 61.0 42.358059 -88.157503

RMF Fish Trap/Jo Daviess 79.7 Hypereutrophic 42.382781 -90.467781

RGZG Forest/Lake 64.4 63.4 55.1 Eutrophic 53.6 42.213038 -88.054505

RGZC Fourth/Lake 61.3 Eutrophic 42.392098 -88.031469

RLH Fyre/Mercer 52.6 Eutrophic 41.296000 -90.488400

RGI Gages/Lake 50.4 Eutrophic 42.351380 -87.999440

Appendix A: Table 4Page 14

Trophic State Indexes Based on the Representative Site

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County TSI

SDTSI

TPTSI

CHL Trophic State TSITN Lat Lon

RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 58.6 56.6 57.6 Eutrophic 53.7 42.400400 -90.349200

RJZK Gamlin/St. Clair 63.0 Eutrophic 38.598500 -90.019600

RTZS Goose/Grundy 60.1 Eutrophic 42.179900 -88.311600

ROP Governor Bond/Bond 71.7 77.3 70.1 Hypereutrophic 56.0 38.925940 -89.399040

RTQ Grass/Lake 73.4 Hypereutrophic 42.430559 -88.163337

RGK Grays/Lake 59.1 Eutrophic 42.342200 -88.048000

RAI Harrisburg/Saline 71.3 Hypereutrophic 37.835837 -88.590005

RNZC Herrin New/Williamson 61.3 Eutrophic 37.635800 -89.014460

RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 57.1 51.1 57.5 Eutrophic 43.8 37.763059 -89.035559

ROZA Highland Silver/Madison 71.3 81.4 60.9 Hypereutrophic 57.3 38.766010 -89.698390

RBO Homer/Champaign 62.8 59.7 66.6 Eutrophic 76.9 40.060210 -87.984840

RTZU Honey/Lake 55.2 58.6 71.6 Eutrophic 55.0 42.200600 -88.130100

WGZY Indian/Cook 53.9 Eutrophic 41.832781 -87.840005

RTZI Island/Lake 69.8 Eutrophic 42.275281 -88.200838

RDI Jacksonville/Morgan 61.3 Eutrophic 39.672503 -90.212226

RNU Jaycee/Jefferson 59.4 Eutrophic 38.370281 -88.898617

WGZX Joliet Jr. College/Will 54.4 Eutrophic 41.500900 -88.185000

RTZV Killarney/McHenry 46.4 45.8 43.6 Mesotrophic 48.9 42.239450 -88.257290

RNC Kinkaid/Jackson 51.9 Eutrophic 37.778836 -89.449500

STM La Fox Pond/Kane 61.3 Eutrophic 41.871560 -88.436560

RAL Lake of Egypt/Williamson 55.7 Eutrophic 37.620837 -88.943338

UTZ Lake of the Hollow/Lake 46.6 Mesotrophic 42.365562 -88.183950

REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 66.0 57.0 62.5 Eutrophic 51.3 40.200559 -88.381671

STG Leisure/Lake 69.8 Eutrophic 42.436200 -88.185900

VGI Leopold/Lake 45.5 52.7 49.7 Mesotrophic 47.8 42.327082 -88.011318

UDC Lincoln/Grundy 28.9 Oligotrophic 41.317348 -88.315116

RGC Linden/Lake 53.9 Eutrophic 42.420837 -88.028338

STC Little Silver/Lake 46.3 Mesotrophic 42.473400 -88.074800

RGU Loch Lomond/Lake 66.5 75.0 68.9 Eutrophic 62.7 42.280600 -88.005100

RTJ Long/Lake 63.4 68.9 68.4 Eutrophic 57.9 42.377781 -88.126115

RHZK Longmeadow/Cook 59.8 65.9 62.3 Eutrophic 51.0 42.086309 -87.752877

VTZJ Louise/Lake 76.5 Hypereutrophic 42.160255 -88.114906

WGZZ Loveless/DuPage 71.7 Hypereutrophic 41.889110 -88.187290

RCF Mattoon/Shelby 74.9 71.9 68.3 Hypereutrophic 67.6 39.334730 -88.482480

SDL Mauvaise Terre/Morgan 77.1 Hypereutrophic 39.720003 -90.214448

RAZA McLeansboro New/Hamilton 71.3 Hypereutrophic 38.084448 -88.553337

RNZI Miller/Jefferson 64.9 62.5 66.7 Eutrophic 54.6 38.396656 -88.892390

RGZD Miltmore/Lake 46.7 44.6 42.7 Mesotrophic 50.7 42.396110 -88.041667

RGP Minear/Lake 45.5 Mesotrophic 42.290317 -87.941458

RND Murphysboro/Jackson 66.8 Eutrophic 37.773615 -89.380559

STO Napa Suwe/Lake 82.1 Hypereutrophic 42.287042 -88.124777

RNZO New Thompson/Jackson 60.1 Eutrophic 37.744167 -89.254722

RTUA Nippersink/Lake 72.1 Hypereutrophic 42.413060 -88.180559

RCC Olney East Fork/Richland 59.8 56.2 67.8 Eutrophic 51.0 38.761670 -88.076710

SDZW Ossami/Tazewell 61.3 75.1 62.6 Eutrophic 70.2 40.635586 -89.468316

RDF Otter/Macoupin 67.7 58.6 71.6 Eutrophic 75.0 39.408900 -89.911990

Appendix A: Table 4Page 15

Trophic State Indexes Based on the Representative Site

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County TSI

SDTSI

TPTSI

CHL Trophic State TSITN Lat Lon

RCG Paradise/Coles 76.0 73.3 75.1 Hypereutrophic 82.8 39.413120 -88.439630

RBL Paris Twin East/Edgar 67.7 Eutrophic 39.630220 -87.677710

RBX Paris Twin West/Edgar 72.5 Hypereutrophic 39.635930 -87.694100

REL Petersburg/Menard 53.0 Eutrophic 39.988600 -89.850100

RPC Pierce/Winnebago 75.4 Hypereutrophic 42.345330 -88.985100

RNH Pinckneyville/Perry 62.3 73.5 Eutrophic 56.4 38.096670 -89.396671

RPZB Pine/Lee 60.0 Eutrophic 41.651800 -89.309500

RPZI Richardson Wildlife/Lee 65.7 Eutrophic 41.715388 -89.188098

RTH Round/Lake 51.5 Eutrophic 42.361671 -88.076671

RGM Sand/Lake 65.4 Eutrophic 42.412503 -88.043337

RCE Sara/Effingham 61.3 58.7 60.0 Eutrophic 51.5 39.126200 -88.618670

RTW Silver/McHenry 48.4 48.7 51.8 Mesotrophic 45.0 42.246650 -88.247460

RNZG Spring Arbor/Jackson 52.3 52.2 60.7 Eutrophic 53.0 37.650281 -89.168893

UGV Spring Ledge/Lake 50.1 54.6 50.6 Eutrophic 49.9 42.423260 -88.020624

RDR Spring/McDonough 69.8 76.1 71.5 Hypereutrophic 77.2 40.506660 -90.717570

REF Springfield/Sangamon 69.4 85.3 65.5 Eutrophic 78.2 39.756115 -89.593616

SGW Stephen/Will 58.1 76.8 69.5 Eutrophic 57.0 41.566400 -88.225981

RPI Summerset/Winnebago 53.5 53.2 53.5 Eutrophic 60.8 42.448600 -89.384900

REZN Sunset/Champaign 49.1 35.0 44.2 Mesotrophic 35.5 40.181900 -88.423200

RPL Sunset/Lee 62.1 Eutrophic 41.647900 -89.293700

UDH Sunset/Macoupin 66.5 73.5 65.5 Eutrophic 60.7 39.436400 -89.855400

RGZF Sylvan/Lake 61.9 59.4 63.1 Eutrophic 53.3 42.242147 -88.046133

REC Taylorville/Christian 67.1 86.2 63.6 Eutrophic 64.1 39.529448 -89.255838

RGW Third/Lake 48.6 Mesotrophic 42.370837 -88.014448

WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 36.0 20.0 29.7 Oligotrophic 57.2 42.223601 -88.302678

WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 31.2 27.4 38.1 Oligotrophic 37.6 42.215852 -88.305410

RTZQ Timber/Lake 56.6 59.4 56.9 Eutrophic 57.1 42.240281 -88.127503

RTZF Tower/Lake 64.4 71.0 61.5 Eutrophic 58.0 42.228185 -88.152374

REZL Twin Oaks/Champaign 78.4 80.0 72.1 Hypereutrophic 65.3 40.213760 -88.375433

RGZM Valley/Lake 61.1 63.2 59.3 Eutrophic 53.5 42.349920 -87.982673

RBD Vermilion/Vermilion 65.7 70.8 71.3 Hypereutrophic 78.1 40.157400 -87.649100

RCA Vernor/Richland 56.6 74.8 23.8 Hypereutrophic 57.6 38.763790 -88.102500

SGB Virginia/Cook 34.2 Oligotrophic 42.146100 -87.945000

WGS Waterford/Lake 45.5 Mesotrophic 42.427200 -88.026400

RTZB West Loon/Lake 44.7 Mesotrophic 42.452781 -88.083338

RPZK Westlake/Winnebago 63.0 72.8 66.6 Hypereutrophic 69.2 42.316337 -89.284705

RTZC Wonder/McHenry 71.7 81.3 78.7 Hypereutrophic 66.5 42.375005 -88.354727

RPM Woodhaven/Lee 59.1 70.1 64.1 Eutrophic 58.2 41.656600 -89.306100

RTZZ Woods Creek/McHenry 60.1 60.8 62.0 Eutrophic 54.1 42.180490 -88.318880

RTS Zurich/Lake 48.1 Mesotrophic 42.195003 -88.098337

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI)

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI)

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI)

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 amd Greater TSI)

Appendix A: Table 5aPage 16

Median Analytical Data from Tier II and III Lakes (S1 only) 2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

Ammonia

(mg/L)

NO2/NO3

(mg/L)

TKN

(mg/L)

TP

(mg/L)

Alkalinity

(mg/L)

Chloride

(mg/L)

TSS

(mg/L)

VSS

(mg/L)

CHL-a, corr

(ug/L)

RCJ Altamont New/Effingham 0.11 0.082 0.91 0.152 54 10 7 16.6

RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0.02 0.055 0.94 0.046 180 7 8 42.7

RPJ Bass/Lee 0.02 1.830 1.34 0.086 170 16 14 49.7

REZG Bertinetti/Christian 0.03 0.959 1.38 0.138 110 18 11 53.7

SEB Bird's Pond/Sangamon* 0.08 0.057 0.77 0.083 155 7 6 17.8

RDO Bloomington/McLean 0.05 5.955 0.98 0.086 177.5 14 8 58.7

RCB Borah/Richland 0.02 0.055 1.41 0.091 0.8

SGC Buffalo Creek/Lake 0.03 0.055 1.01 0.080 153 182 11 9 19.3

RPV Candlewick/Boone 0.02 0.065 0.81 0.048 120 16 16 27.4

RDD Canton/Fulton 0.05 4.455 0.67 0.044 163 9 6 14.7

RNI Carbondale/Jackson 0.02 0.055 1.25 0.082 81 16 13

RNE Cedar/Jackson 0.02 0.055 0.67 0.016 41 4 4 8.2

RGR Charles/DuPage* 0.21 0.055 1.24 0.230 133 123 11 9 31.8

RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 0.02 0.055 1.53 0.099 140 22 13 70.8

WDK Civic/Grundy 0.04 0.055 0.28 0.005 128 4 4 1.8

VTZH Crystal/McHenry 0.15 0.099 0.71 0.016 185 103 4 4 16.2

REE Dawson/McLean 0.03 2.765 0.71 0.026 130 7 6 25.8

REA Decatur/Macon 0.05 9.760 0.95 0.109 201 19 9 40.7

WGZK Deep Quarry/DuPage 0.04 0.055 0.27 0.011 170 68 4 4 2.7

VTD Deep/Lake 0.04 0.055 0.64 0.019 158 214 5 4 6.2

RNJ Devil's Kitchen/Williamson 0.02 0.055 0.27 0.010 27 4 4

RGB Diamond/Lake 0.02 0.055 0.72 0.033 140 165 7 6 6.9

RGV Druce/Lake 0.02 0.055 0.49 0.010 133 322 5 4 5.6

SDA Evergreen/McLean 0.10 5.085 0.88 0.038 135 11 9 18.9

VTT Fischer/Lake 0.02 0.055 1.52 0.136 160 109 18 15 45.3

RGZG Forest/Lake 0.04 0.055 0.89 0.061 145 220 13 8 12.1

RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0.05 0.055 0.65 0.038 195 7 6 15.6

ROP Governor Bond/Bond 0.02 0.055 1.06 0.160 100 15 13 56.3

RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0.07 0.055 0.42 0.026 34 4 6 15.5

ROZA Highland Silver/Madison 0.10 0.235 0.99 0.212 51 13 8 21.9

RBO Homer/Champaign 0.03 3.925 0.80 0.047 180 11 8 39.4

RTZU Honey/Lake 0.03 0.055 0.98 0.044 150 140 9 8 65.4

Appendix A: Table 5aPage 17

Median Analytical Data from Tier II and III Lakes (S1 only) 2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

Ammonia

(mg/L)

NO2/NO3

(mg/L)

TKN

(mg/L)

TP

(mg/L)

Alkalinity

(mg/L)

Chloride

(mg/L)

TSS

(mg/L)

VSS

(mg/L)

CHL-a, corr

(ug/L)

RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0.07 0.055 0.63 0.018 200 184 4 4 3.8

REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 0.02 0.055 0.75 0.039 175 12 9 25.8

VGI Leopold/Lake 0.07 0.055 0.57 0.029 165 183 4 4 7.0

RGU Loch Lomond/Lake 0.03 0.055 1.72 0.136 148 144 17 15 49.9

RTJ Long/Lake 0.02 0.057 1.22 0.089 173 152 14 9 47.0

RHZK Longmeadow/Cook* 0.43 0.061 0.73 0.073 233 57 7 6 25.3

RCF Mattoon/Shelby 0.02 1.364 1.12 0.110 110 15 11 46.9

RNZI Miller/Jefferson 0.02 0.055 0.96 0.057 50 8 8 39.5

RGZD Miltmore/Lake 0.04 0.055 0.72 0.017 143 230 5 5 3.4

RCC Olney East Fork/Richland 0.04 0.055 0.73 0.037 44.3

SDZW Ossami/Tazewell* 0.06 1.553 1.43 0.137 175 13 10 26.1

RDF Otter/Macoupin 0.02 2.785 1.37 0.044 83 12 12 65.2

RCG Paradise/Coles 0.02 5.805 1.33 0.121 145 15 11 93.7

RNH Pinckneyville/Perry 0.02 0.055 1.09 0.123 100 12 11

RCE Sara/Effingham 0.02 0.055 0.76 0.044 100 7 6 20.0

RTW Silver/McHenry 0.04 0.055 0.47 0.022 195 193 7 6 8.7

RNZG Spring Arbor/Jackson 0.06 0.055 0.85 0.028 70 4 4 21.6

UGV Spring Ledge/Lake* 0.02 0.055 0.68 0.033 153 237 5 5 7.7

RDR Spring/McDonough 0.02 3.480 1.37 0.147 115 16 12 64.7

REF Springfield/Sangamon 0.02 4.600 0.80 0.278 130 11 7 35.1

SGW Stephen/Will* 0.33 0.065 1.13 0.154 248 183 13 10 53.0

RPI Summerset/Winnebago 0.07 0.844 0.71 0.030 185 4 4 10.3

REZN Sunset/Champaign 0.02 0.055 0.21 0.009 133 5 4 4.0

UDH Sunset/Macoupin 0.02 0.739 0.80 0.123 96 13 9 35.1

RGZF Sylvan/Lake 0.04 0.055 0.87 0.046 145 124 14 10 27.5

REC Taylorville/Christian 0.03 0.978 0.98 0.297 148 20 10 28.8

WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0.02 1.020 0.19 0.003 200 335 4 4 0.9

WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0.02 0.055 0.26 0.005 170 349 4 4 2.1

RTZQ Timber/Lake 0.03 0.140 1.07 0.046 163 98 5 5 14.5

RTZF Tower/Lake 0.06 0.055 1.23 0.103 190 104 12 9 23.3

REZL Twin Oaks/Champaign* 0.02 0.055 2.07 0.192 128 31 21 68.4

RGZM Valley/Lake* 0.12 0.055 0.88 0.060 190 232 7 7 18.7

Appendix A: Table 5aPage 18

Median Analytical Data from Tier II and III Lakes (S1 only) 2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County

Ammonia

(mg/L)

NO2/NO3

(mg/L)

TKN

(mg/L)

TP

(mg/L)

Alkalinity

(mg/L)

Chloride

(mg/L)

TSS

(mg/L)

VSS

(mg/L)

CHL-a, corr

(ug/L)

RBD Vermilion/Vermilion 0.02 3.740 1.41 0.102 170 15 11 63.5

RCA Vernor/Richland 0.02 0.055 1.19 0.134 0.5

RPZK Westlake/Winnebago 0.06 1.610 1.18 0.117 180 15 13 39.1

RTZC Wonder/McHenry 0.04 0.202 2.11 0.210 185 80 31 23 135.0

RPM Woodhaven/Lee 0.05 0.055 1.24 0.097 140 13 12 30.4

RTZZ Woods Creek/McHenry 0.02 0.055 0.92 0.051 170 140 11 10 24.7

At least one sample comprising the TP data was over 0.05 mg/L

At or below Method Detection Limit (MDL) or the Reporting Limit (RL)

RED Median value is over WQS.

Over the acute benchmark of for protection of sensitive aquatic animals. Not a WQS.

Over the chronic benchmark for protection of sensitive aquatic animals. Not a WQS.

* Lake with less than 20 acres of surface area.

Appendix A: Table 5bPage 19

Median Analytical Data for Tier III(Both S1 and WL)

2013 VLMP Report

Data

Set

Lake

CodeLake/County

Ammonia

(mg/L)

NO2/NO3

(mg/L)

TKN

(mg/L)

TP

(mg/L)

Alkalinity

(mg/L)

Chloride

(mg/L)

TSS

(mg/L)

VSS

(mg/L)

CHL-a, corr

(ug/L)

S1 RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0.02 0.055 0.94 0.046 180 7 8 42.7

WL RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0.02 0.055 0.99 0.057 180 7 7 42.7

S1 REZG Bertinetti/Christian 0.03 0.959 1.38 0.138 110 18 11 53.7

WL REZG Bertinetti/Christian 0.03 0.959 1.38 0.179 110 20 11 67.6

S1 RDO Bloomington/McLean 0.05 5.955 0.98 0.086 177.5 14 8 58.7

WL RDO Bloomington/McLean 0.05 5.245 1.01 0.0965 177.5 14 9 43.1

S1 RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 0.02 0.055 1.53 0.099 140 22 13 70.8

WL RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 0.02 0.055 1.41 0.098 145 19 14 64.0

S1 SDA Evergreen/McLean 0.10 5.085 0.88 0.038 135 11 9 18.9

WL SDA Evergreen/McLean 0.11 4.350 0.95 0.0485 142.5 12 8 25.6

S1 RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0.05 0.055 0.65 0.038 195 7 6 15.6

WL RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0.05 0.055 0.74 0.04 205 7 6 18.2

S1 RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0.07 0.055 0.42 0.026 34 4 6 15.5

WL RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0.03 0.055 0.53 0.024 34 4 5 14.4

S1 RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0.07 0.055 0.63 0.018 200 184 4 4 3.8

WL RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0.07 0.055 0.62 0.018 200 184 5 4 3.9

S1 REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 0.02 0.055 0.75 0.039 175 12 9 25.8

WL REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 0.02 0.055 0.83 0.053 155 11 9 30.7

S1 RCE Sara/Effingham 0.02 0.055 0.76 0.044 100 7 6 20.0

WL RCE Sara/Effingham 0.02 0.055 0.81 0.051 100 9 8 24.3

S1 RTW Silver/McHenry 0.04 0.055 0.47 0.022 195 193 7 6 8.7

WL RTW Silver/McHenry 0.04 0.055 0.51 0.025 195 193 6 5 6.3

S1 RDR Spring/McDonough 0.02 3.480 1.37 0.147 115 16 12 64.7

WL RDR Spring/McDonough 0.02 2.750 1.45 0.182 120 34 14 68.1

S1 REF Springfield/Sangamon 0.02 4.600 0.80 0.278 130 11 7 35.1

WL REF Springfield/Sangamon 0.02 5.750 1.19 0.278 140 20 10 38.7

S1 WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0.02 1.020 0.19 0.003 200 335 4 4 0.9

WL WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0.02 0.986 0.19 0.003 200 332 4 4 0.9

S1 WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0.02 0.055 0.26 0.005 170 349 4 4 2.1

WL WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0.02 0.055 0.26 0.005 170 348 4 4 1.5

Appendix A: Table 5bPage 20

Median Analytical Data for Tier III(Both S1 and WL)

2013 VLMP Report

At or below Method Detection Limit (MDL) or if MDL is not available, the Reporting Limit (RL).

At least one value over WQS.

RED Median value is over WQS.

S1 Data set using Tier III site 1 data only.

WL Data set using all Tier III surface data.

Appendix A: Table 6aPage 21

Data Derived from Analytical Results for Tier II and III Lakes (S1 only)

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County NVSS

Inorganic

Nitrogen

(mg/L)

TNTN:TP

Ratio

Limiting

NutrientTSI

TPTSI

CHL

RCJ Altamont New/Effingham 2.5 0.192 0.989 6.5 N Limited 76.6 58.2

RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0 0.075 1.085 17.7 Transitional 59.4 67.4

RPJ Bass/Lee 2.0 1.850 3.170 36.9 P Limited 68.4 68.9

REZG Bertinetti/Christian 6 1.059 2.339 23.2 Transitional 75.2 69.7

SEB Bird's Pond/Sangamon 1.0 0.137 0.828 10.0 N Limited 67.8 58.8

RDO Bloomington/McLean 4.5 6.005 6.912 92.5 P Limited 68.4 70.6

RCB Borah/Richland 0 0.075 1.465 16.1 Transitional 69.2 27.9

SGC Buffalo Creek/Lake 2.5 0.085 1.065 13.4 N Limited 67.2 59.6

RPV Candlewick/Boone 0 0.085 0.876 18.4 Transitional 59.8 63.1

RDD Canton/Fulton 3.0 4.500 5.127 117.9 P Limited 58.6 57.0

RNI Carbondale/Jackson 3.0 0.075 1.305 16.0 Transitional 67.6

RNE Cedar/Jackson 0 0.075 0.726 45.4 P Limited 44.1 51.3

RGR Charles/DuPage 2.0 0.260 1.295 5.6 N Limited 82.5 64.5

RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 8 0.075 1.585 14.1 Transitional 70.4 72.4

WDK Civic/Grundy 0 0.095 0.339 67.8 P Limited 27.4 36.3

VTZH Crystal/McHenry 0 0.244 0.809 50.5 P Limited 44.1 57.9

REE Dawson/McLean 1.5 2.795 3.473 136.2 P Limited 50.9 62.5

REA Decatur/Macon 10.0 9.805 10.711 98.7 P Limited 71.7 67.0

WGZK Deep Quarry/DuPage 0 0.095 0.327 29.7 Transitional 38.7 40.2

VTD Deep/Lake 0.5 0.090 0.698 36.7 P Limited 46.6 48.5

RNJ Devil's Kitchen/Williamson 0 0.075 0.323 32.3 P Limited 37.4

RGB Diamond/Lake 1.5 0.075 0.778 23.9 Transitional 54.3 49.6

RGV Druce/Lake 0.5 0.075 0.546 54.6 P Limited 37.4 47.5

SDA Evergreen/McLean 1.5 5.130 6.008 161.2 P Limited 56.4 59.4

VTT Fischer/Lake 3.5 0.075 1.575 11.6 N Limited 75.0 68.0

RGZG Forest/Lake 4.5 0.095 0.942 15.4 Transitional 63.4 55.1

RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0 0.105 0.949 20.5 Transitional 56.6 57.6

ROP Governor Bond/Bond 2.0 0.075 1.115 7.0 N Limited 77.3 70.1

RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0 0.125 0.479 22.5 Transitional 51.1 57.5

ROZA Highland Silver/Madison 5.0 0.335 1.221 5.8 N Limited 81.4 60.9

RBO Homer/Champaign 2.5 3.950 4.729 100.6 P Limited 59.7 66.6

RTZU Honey/Lake 0.5 0.080 1.038 23.9 Transitional 58.6 71.6

RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0 0.125 0.683 34.9 P Limited 45.8 43.6

REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 2 0.075 0.803 17.4 Transitional 57.0 62.5

VGI Leopold/Lake 0 0.120 0.630 21.7 Transitional 52.7 49.7

RGU Loch Lomond/Lake 2.0 0.085 1.775 13.1 N Limited 75.0 68.9

RTJ Long/Lake 4.5 0.077 1.272 14.3 Transitional 68.9 68.4

RHZK Longmeadow/Cook 0.5 0.486 0.789 10.9 N Limited 65.9 62.3

RCF Mattoon/Shelby 4.0 1.384 2.484 22.7 Transitional 71.9 68.3

RNZI Miller/Jefferson 0.5 0.075 1.012 17.7 Transitional 62.5 66.7

RGZD Miltmore/Lake 0 0.090 0.773 46.8 P Limited 44.6 42.7

RCC Olney East Fork/Richland 0 0.095 0.787 21.3 Transitional 56.2 67.8

SDZW Ossami/Tazewell 2.5 1.613 2.980 21.8 Transitional 75.1 62.6

RDF Otter/Macoupin 0 2.805 4.150 95.4 P Limited 58.6 71.6

Appendix A: Table 6aPage 22

Data Derived from Analytical Results for Tier II and III Lakes (S1 only)

2013 VLMP Report

Lake

CodeLake/County NVSS

Inorganic

Nitrogen

(mg/L)

TNTN:TP

Ratio

Limiting

NutrientTSI

TPTSI

CHL

RCG Paradise/Coles 4.0 5.825 7.130 58.9 P Limited 73.3 75.1

RNH Pinckneyville/Perry 0.5 0.075 1.145 9.3 N Limited 73.5

RCE Sara/Effingham 0 0.075 0.817 17.4 Transitional 58.7 60.0

RTW Silver/McHenry 0 0.095 0.520 26.7 Transitional 48.7 51.8

RNZG Spring Arbor/Jackson 0 0.110 0.907 32.4 P Limited 52.2 60.7

UGV Spring Ledge/Lake 0 0.075 0.732 22.2 Transitional 54.6 50.6

RDR Spring/McDonough 2 3.500 4.850 34.1 P Limited 76.1 71.5

REF Springfield/Sangamon 4 4.620 5.203 18.7 Transitional 85.3 65.5

SGW Stephen/Will 3.5 0.395 1.190 7.7 N Limited 76.8 69.5

RPI Summerset/Winnebago 0 0.914 1.550 51.7 P Limited 53.2 53.5

REZN Sunset/Champaign 0.5 0.075 0.269 31.6 P Limited 35.0 44.2

UDH Sunset/Macoupin 4.0 0.759 1.539 12.5 N Limited 73.5 65.5

RGZF Sylvan/Lake 3.5 0.090 0.922 20.0 Transitional 59.4 63.1

REC Taylorville/Christian 10.0 1.003 1.957 6.6 N Limited 86.2 63.6

WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0 1.040 1.210 403.3 P Limited 20.0 29.7

WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0 0.095 0.312 74.8 P Limited 27.4 38.1

RTZQ Timber/Lake 0 0.170 1.205 26.2 Transitional 59.4 56.9

RTZF Tower/Lake 3.0 0.110 1.280 12.4 N Limited 71.0 61.5

REZL Twin Oaks/Champaign 9.5 0.075 2.120 11.0 N Limited 80.0 72.1

RGZM Valley/Lake 0.5 0.175 0.936 15.6 Transitional 63.2 59.3

RBD Vermilion/Vermilion 4.0 3.760 5.150 50.5 P Limited 70.8 71.3

RCA Vernor/Richland 0 0.075 1.245 9.3 N Limited 74.8 23.8

RPZK Westlake/Winnebago 2.0 1.665 2.785 23.9 Transitional 72.8 66.6

RTZC Wonder/McHenry 8.5 0.242 2.312 11.0 N Limited 81.3 78.7

RPM Woodhaven/Lee 1.0 0.105 1.295 13.4 N Limited 70.1 64.1

RTZZ Woods Creek/McHenry 1.0 0.075 0.978 19.2 Transitional 60.8 62.0

Levels considered high enough to proove harmful to aquatic mammals.

Levels considered high enough to readily stimulate algal blooms.

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI)

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI)

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI)

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 amd Greater TSI)

S1 Data set using Tier III site 1 data only.

Appendix A: Table 6bPage 23

Data Derived from Analytical Results for Tier III (Both WL and S1)

2013 VLMP Report

Data

Set

Lake

CodeLake/County NVSS

Inorganic

Nitrogen

(mg/L)

TNTN:TP

Ratio

Limiting

NutrientTSI

TP TSICHL

S1 RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0 0.075 1.085 17.7 Transitional 59.4 67.4

WL RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0 0.165 1.145 19.7 Transitional 62.5 67.4

S1 REZG Bertinetti/Christian 6 1.059 2.339 23.2 Transitional 75.2 69.7

WL REZG Bertinetti/Christian 7 1.053 2.253 21.4 Transitional 79.0 71.9

S1 RDO Bloomington/McLean 4.5 6.005 6.912 92.5 P Limited 68.4 70.6

WL RDO Bloomington/McLean 5 5.295 6.425 76.2 P Limited 70.0 67.5

S1 RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 8 0.075 1.585 14.1 Transitional 70.4 72.4

WL RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 4 0.082 1.466 15.2 Transitional 70.3 71.4

S1 SDA Evergreen/McLean 1.5 5.130 6.008 161.2 P Limited 56.4 59.4

WL SDA Evergreen/McLean 2.5 4.395 5.340 99.7 P Limited 60.1 62.4

S1 RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0 0.105 0.949 20.5 Transitional 56.6 57.6

WL RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 1 0.105 0.874 18.6 Transitional 57.3 59.1

S1 RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0 0.125 0.479 22.5 Transitional 51.1 57.5

WL RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0 0.085 0.586 21.4 Transitional 50.0 56.8

S1 RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0 0.125 0.683 34.9 P Limited 45.8 43.6

WL RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0 0.125 0.678 37.0 P Limited 45.8 43.9

S1 REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 2 0.075 0.803 17.4 Transitional 57.0 62.5

WL REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 2 0.075 0.888 16.3 Transitional 61.4 64.2

S1 RCE Sara/Effingham 0 0.075 0.817 17.4 Transitional 58.7 60.0

WL RCE Sara/Effingham 1 0.075 0.954 17.4 Transitional 60.8 61.9

S1 RTW Silver/McHenry 0 0.095 0.520 26.7 Transitional 48.7 51.8

WL RTW Silver/McHenry 0 0.095 0.568 23.9 Transitional 50.6 48.7

S1 RDR Spring/McDonough 2 3.500 4.850 34.1 P Limited 76.1 71.5

WL RDR Spring/McDonough 19 2.770 4.480 24.6 Transitional 79.2 72.0

S1 REF Springfield/Sangamon 4 4.620 5.203 18.7 Transitional 85.3 65.5

WL REF Springfield/Sangamon 13 5.770 6.404 24.1 Transitional 85.3 66.5

S1 WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0 1.040 1.210 403.3 P Limited 20.0 29.7

WL WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0 1.006 1.176 373.7 P Limited 20.0 29.5

S1 WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0 0.095 0.312 74.8 P Limited 27.4 38.1

WL WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0 0.094 0.318 63.6 P Limited 27.4 34.4

Levels considered high enough to readily stimulate algal blooms.

Levels considered high enough to proove harmful to aquatic mammals.

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI)

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI)

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI)

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 amd Greater TSI)

S1 Data set using Tier III site 1 data only.

WL Data set using all Tier III data.

Appendix A: Table 7aPage 24

Tier III Aquatic Life Assessments (Compares S1 to WL data)

2013 VLMP Report

Aquatic Life Use

Data SetLake

CodeLake/County

NVSS

(mg/L)Plant Cover TSISD TSITP TSICHL NVSS

Plant

CoverTSISD TSITP TSICHL TSISD TSITP TSICHL

S1 RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0 5% to 25% 61.5 59.4 67.4 0 0 50 40 50 50 40 50 Good

WL RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0 5% to 25% 61.7 62.5 67.4 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Good

S1 REZG Bertinetti/Christian 6 Less Than 5% 69.8 75.2 69.7 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

WL REZG Bertinetti/Christian 6 Less Than 5% 70.9 79.0 71.9 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

S1 RDO Bloomington/McLean 4.5 Less Than 5% 66.0 68.4 70.6 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

WL RDO Bloomington/McLean 4.5 Less Than 5% 67.1 70.0 67.5 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

S1 RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 8 Less Than 5% 72.1 70.4 72.4 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

WL RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 8 Less Than 5% 72.1 70.3 71.4 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

S1 SDA Evergreen/McLean 1.5 Less Than 5% 61.3 56.4 59.4 0 15 50 40 40 65 55 55 Good

WL SDA Evergreen/McLean 1.5 Less Than 5% 66.5 60.1 62.4 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

S1 RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0 5% To 15% 58.6 56.6 57.6 0 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 Good

WL RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0 5% To 15% 58.9 57.3 59.1 0 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 Good

S1 RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0 Less Than 5% 57.1 51.1 57.5 0 15 40 40 40 55 55 55 Good

WL RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0 Less Than 5% 57.1 50.0 56.8 0 15 40 40 40 55 55 55 Good

S1 RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0 51% To 70% 46.4 45.8 43.6 0 10 40 40 40 50 50 50 Good

WL RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0 51% To 70% 46.4 45.8 43.9 0 10 40 40 40 50 50 50 Good

S1 REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 2 Less Than 5% 66.0 57.0 62.5 0 15 50 40 50 65 55 65 Good

WL REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 2 Less Than 5% 66.5 61.4 64.2 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

S1 RCE Sara/Effingham 0 Less Than 5% 61.3 58.7 60.0 0 15 50 40 50 65 55 65 Good

WL RCE Sara/Effingham 0 Less Than 5% 63.0 60.8 61.9 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

S1 RTW Silver/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 48.4 48.7 51.8 0 5 40 40 40 45 45 45 Good

WL RTW Silver/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 52.6 50.6 48.7 0 5 40 40 40 45 45 45 Good

S1 RDR Spring/McDonough 2 Less Than 5% 69.8 76.1 71.5 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

WL RDR Spring/McDonough 2 Less Than 5% 73.9 79.2 72.0 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

S1 REF Springfield/Sangamon 4 5% to 25% 69.4 85.3 65.5 0 0 50 60 50 50 60 50 Good

WL REF Springfield/Sangamon 4 5% to 25% 76.0 85.3 66.5 0 0 50 60 50 50 60 50 Good

S1 WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0 5% to 25% 36.0 20.0 29.7 0 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 Good

WL WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0 5% to 25% 39.1 20.0 29.5 0 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 Good

S1 WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 31.2 27.4 38.1 0 5 40 40 40 45 45 45 Good

WL WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 32.8 27.4 34.4 0 5 40 40 40 45 45 45 Good

Rating

Tier 3 Derived Lake Data Points Assigned Score

Appendix A: Table 7aPage 25

Tier III Aquatic Life Assessments (Compares S1 to WL data)

2013 VLMP Report

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI) Good Aquatic Life Rating - Good - Less than 75

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI) Fair Aquatic Life Rating - Fair - 75 to 95

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI) Poor Aquatic Life Rating - Poor - 95 or greater

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 or greater TSI)

S1 Data set using Tier III site 1 data only.

WL Data set using all Tier III data.

Appendix A: Table 7bPage 26

Tier II Aquatic Life Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aquatic Life Use Rating

Lake

CodeLake/County

NVSS

(mg/L)Plant Cover TSISD TSITP TSICHL NVSS

Plant

CoverTSISD TSITP TSICHL TSISD TSITP TSICHL

RCJ Altamont New/Effingham 2.5 Less Than 5% 60.0 76.6 58.2 0 15 50 50 40 65 65 55 Good

RPJ Bass/Lee 2.0 5% to 25% 64.9 68.4 68.9 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Good

SEB Bird's Pond/Sangamon 1.0 5% To 15% 62.1 67.8 58.8 0 0 50 50 40 50 50 40 Good

RCB Borah/Richland 0 Less Than 5% 68.4 69.2 27.9 0 15 50 50 40 65 65 55 Good

SGC Buffalo Creek/Lake 2.5 26% to 50% 71.3 67.2 59.6 0 5 50 50 40 55 55 45 Good

RPV Candlewick/Boone 0 5% to 25% 59.8 59.8 63.1 0 0 40 40 50 40 40 50 Good

RDD Canton/Fulton 3.0 Less Than 5% 53.2 58.6 57.0 0 15 40 40 40 55 55 55 Good

RNI Carbondale/Jackson 3.0 Less Than 5% 82.1 67.6 0 15 50 50 65 65 Good

RNE Cedar/Jackson 0 Less Than 5% 56.6 44.1 51.3 0 15 40 40 40 55 55 55 Good

RGR Charles/DuPage 2.0 5% to 25% 63.4 82.5 64.5 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Good

WDK Civic/Grundy 0 Less Than 5% 25.1 27.4 36.3 0 15 40 40 40 55 55 55 Good

VTZH Crystal/McHenry 0 5% to 25% 43.1 44.1 57.9 0 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 Good

REE Dawson/McLean 1.5 Less Than 5% 54.7 50.9 62.5 0 15 40 40 50 55 55 65 Good

REA Decatur/Macon 10.0 Less Than 5% 70.5 71.7 67.0 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

WGZK Deep Quarry/DuPage 0 26% to 50% 32.2 38.7 40.2 0 5 40 40 40 45 45 45 Good

VTD Deep/Lake 0.5 5% to 25% 38.5 46.6 48.5 0 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 Good

RNJ Devils Kitchen/Williamson 0 26% to 50% 44.0 37.4 0 5 40 40 45 45 Good

RGB Diamond/Lake 1.5 26% to 50% 51.9 54.3 49.6 0 5 40 40 40 45 45 45 Good

RGV Druce/Lake 0.5 26% to 50% 40.3 37.4 47.5 0 5 40 40 40 45 45 45 Good

VTT Fischer/Lake 3.5 26% To 40% 68.4 75.0 68.0 0 5 50 50 50 55 55 55 Good

RGZG Forest/Lake 4.5 Less Than 5% 64.4 63.4 55.1 0 15 50 50 40 65 65 55 Good

ROP Governor Bond/Bond 2.0 Less Than 5% 71.7 77.3 70.1 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

ROZA Highland Silver/Madison 5.0 Less Than 5% 71.3 81.4 60.9 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RBO Homer/Champaign 2.5 Less Than 5% 62.8 59.7 66.6 0 15 50 40 50 65 55 65 Good

RTZU Honey/Lake 0.5 5% to 25% 55.2 58.6 71.6 0 0 40 40 50 40 40 50 Good

VGI Leopold/Lake 0 51% To 70% 45.5 52.7 49.7 0 10 40 40 40 50 50 50 Good

RGU Loch Lomond/Lake 2.0 Less Than 5% 66.5 75.0 68.9 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RTJ Long/Lake 4.5 5% to 25% 63.4 68.9 68.4 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Good

RHZK Longmeadow/Cook 0.5 26% to 50% 59.8 65.9 62.3 0 5 40 50 50 45 55 55 Good

RCF Mattoon/Shelby 4.0 Less Than 5% 74.9 71.9 68.3 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RNZI Miller/Jefferson 0.5 Less Than 5% 64.9 62.5 66.7 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

Representative Site Derived Lake Data Points Assigned Score

Appendix A: Table 7bPage 27

Tier II Aquatic Life Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aquatic Life Use Rating

Lake

CodeLake/County

NVSS

(mg/L)Plant Cover TSISD TSITP TSICHL NVSS

Plant

CoverTSISD TSITP TSICHL TSISD TSITP TSICHL

Representative Site Derived Lake Data Points Assigned Score

RGZD Miltmore/Lake 0 51% To 70% 46.7 44.6 42.7 0 10 40 40 40 50 50 50 Good

RCC Olney East Fork/Richland 0 Less Than 5% 59.8 56.2 67.8 0 15 40 40 50 55 55 65 Good

SDZW Ossami/Tazewell 2.5 51% To 70% 61.3 75.1 62.6 0 10 50 50 50 60 60 60 Good

RDF Otter/Macoupin 0 Less Than 5% 67.7 58.6 71.6 0 15 50 40 50 65 55 65 Good

RCG Paradise/Coles 4.0 Less Than 5% 76.0 73.3 75.1 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RNH Pinckneyville/Perry 0.5 Less Than 5% 62.3 73.5 0 15 50 50 65 65 Good

RNZG Spring Arbor/Jackson 0 Less Than 5% 52.3 52.2 60.7 0 15 40 40 50 55 55 65 Good

UGV Spring Ledge/Lake 0 51% To 70% 50.1 54.6 50.6 0 10 40 40 40 50 50 50 Good

SGW Stephen/Will 3.5 5% to 25% 58.1 76.8 69.5 0 0 40 50 50 40 50 50 Good

RPI Summerset/Winnebago 0 Less Than 5% 53.5 53.2 53.5 0 15 40 40 40 55 55 55 Good

REZN Sunset/Champaign 0.5 Less Than 5% 49.1 35.0 44.2 0 15 40 40 40 55 55 55 Good

UDH Sunset/Macoupin 4.0 Less Than 5% 66.5 73.5 65.5 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RGZF Sylvan/Lake 3.5 Less Than 5% 61.9 59.4 63.1 0 15 50 40 50 65 55 65 Good

REC Taylorville/Christian 10.0 Less Than 5% 67.1 86.2 63.6 0 15 50 60 50 65 75 65 Good

RTZQ Timber/Lake 0 5% to 25% 56.6 59.4 56.9 0 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 Good

RTZF Tower/Lake 3.0 5% to 25% 64.4 71.0 61.5 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Good

REZL Twin Oaks/Champaign 9.5 Less Than 5% 78.4 80.0 72.1 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RGZM Valley/Lake 0.5 5% to 25% 61.1 63.2 59.3 0 0 50 50 40 50 50 40 Good

RBD Vermilion/Vermilion 4.0 5% To 15% 65.7 70.8 71.3 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Good

RCA Vernor/Richland 0 Less Than 5% 56.6 74.8 23.8 0 15 40 50 40 55 65 55 Good

RPZK Westlake/Winnebago 2.0 Less Than 5% 65.7 72.8 66.6 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RTZC Wonder/McHenry 8.5 Less Than 5% 71.7 81.3 78.7 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

RPM Woodhaven/Lee 1.0 5% To 15% 59.1 70.1 64.1 0 0 40 50 50 40 50 50 Good

RTZZ Woods Creek/McHenry 1.0 Less Than 5% 60.1 60.8 62.0 0 15 50 50 50 65 65 65 Good

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI) Good Aquatic Life Rating - Good - Less than 75

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI) Fair Aquatic Life Rating - Fair - 75 to 95

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI) Poor Aquatic Life Rating - Poor - 95 or greater

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 or greater TSI)

Appendix A: Table 7cPage 28

Tier I Aquatic Life Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aquatic Life Use

Lake

CodeLake/County Plant Cover TSI

SD NVSS

Low

NVSS

High

Plant

CoverTSI

SD TSISD

Low

TSISD

High

RTT Antioch/Lake Less Than 5% 53.5 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

RTG Bangs/Lake 26% to 50% 45.5 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

RTZT Barrington/Lake 5% to 25% 56.3 0 15 0 40 40 55 Good

RDW Beaver/Grundy 5% to 25% 44.7 0 15 0 40 40 55 Good

RPK Black Oak/Lee 5% To 15% 66.3 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

STJ Campton/Kane 5% to 25% 73.0 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RNZH Campus/Jackson Less Than 5% 63.7 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RTD Catherine/Lake 26% to 50% 63.7 0 15 5 50 55 70 Good

RTI Channel/Lake 26% to 50% 66.5 0 15 5 50 55 70 Good

VTZ Charlotte/Kane Less Than 5% 43.2 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

SNA Chautauqua/Jackson Less Than 5% 67.1 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RGQ Countryside/Lake Greater Than 70% 60.5 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RGZA Crooked/Lake Less Than 5% 65.7 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RTZG Duck/Lake Greater Than 70% 56.6 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

RTM East Loon/Lake 26% to 50% 62.8 0 15 5 50 55 70 Good

SDS Eureka/Woodford Less Than 5% 68.4 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RMF Fish Trap/Jo Daviess 5% To 15% 79.7 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RGZC Fourth/Lake Greater Than 70% 61.3 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RLH Fyre/Mercer Less Than 5% 52.6 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

RGI Gages/Lake 51% To 70% 50.4 0 15 10 40 50 65 Good

RJZK Gamlin/St. Clair 5% To 15% 63.0 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RTZS Goose/Grundy Less Than 5% 60.1 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RTQ Grass/Lake Less Than 5% 73.4 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RGK Grays/Lake 26% to 50% 59.1 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

RAI Harrisburg/Saline No Selection 71.3 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RNZC Herrin New/Williamson Less Than 5% 61.3 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

WGZY Indian/Cook Less Than 5% 53.9 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

RTZI Island/Lake 5% to 25% 69.8 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RDI Jacksonville/Morgan Less Than 5% 61.3 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RNU Jaycee/Jefferson Less Than 5% 59.4 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

WGZX Joliet Jr. College/Will 26% to 50% 54.4 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

RNC Kinkaid/Jackson 5% to 25% 51.9 0 15 0 40 40 55 Good

STM La Fox Pond/Kane 26% to 50% 61.3 0 15 5 50 55 70 Good

RAL Lake of Egypt/Williamson 26% to 50% 55.7 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

UTZ Lake of the Hollow/Lake 51% To 70% 46.6 0 15 10 40 50 65 Good

STG Leisure/Lake Less Than 5% 69.8 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

UDC Lincoln/Grundy Less Than 5% 28.9 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

RGC Linden/Lake 26% to 50% 53.9 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

STC Little Silver/Lake 26% to 50% 46.3 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

VTZJ Louise/Lake Less Than 5% 76.5 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

WGZZ Loveless/DuPage 51% To 70% 71.7 0 15 10 50 60 75 Good to Fair

SDL Mauvaise Terre/Morgan Less Than 5% 77.1 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RAZA McLeansboro New/Hamilton Less Than 5% 71.3 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RGP Minear/Lake Less Than 5% 45.5 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

ScorePoints AssignedTier 1 Derived Lake DataRating or

Range

Appendix A: Table 7cPage 29

Tier I Aquatic Life Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aquatic Life Use

Lake

CodeLake/County Plant Cover TSI

SD NVSS

Low

NVSS

High

Plant

CoverTSI

SD TSISD

Low

TSISD

High

ScorePoints AssignedTier 1 Derived Lake DataRating or

Range

RND Murphysboro/Jackson 5% to 25% 66.8 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

STO Napa Suwe/Lake Less Than 5% 82.1 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RNZO New Thompson/Jackson 5% to 25% 60.1 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RTUA Nippersink/Lake 5% to 25% 72.1 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RBL Paris Twin East/Edgar Less Than 5% 67.7 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RBX Paris Twin West/Edgar Less Than 5% 72.5 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

REL Petersburg/Menard Less Than 5% 53.0 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

RPC Pierce/Winnebago 5% To 15% 75.4 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RPZB Pine/Lee 5% To 15% 60.0 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RPZI Richardson Wildlife/Lee 51% To 70% 65.7 0 15 10 50 60 75 Good to Fair

RTH Round/Lake 5% to 25% 51.5 0 15 0 40 40 55 Good

RGM Sand/Lake 5% to 25% 65.4 0 15 0 50 50 65 Good

RPL Sunset/Lee Less Than 5% 62.1 0 15 15 50 65 80 Good to Fair

RGW Third/Lake 26% to 50% 48.6 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

SGB Virginia/Cook Less Than 5% 34.2 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

WGS Waterford/Lake Greater Than 70% 45.5 0 15 15 40 55 70 Good

RTZB West Loon/Lake 26% to 50% 44.7 0 15 5 40 45 60 Good

RTS Zurich/Lake 5% to 25% 48.1 0 15 0 40 40 55 Good

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI) Good Aquatic Life Rating - Good - Less than 75

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI) Fair Aquatic Life Rating - Fair - 75 to 95

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI) Poor Aquatic Life Rating - Poor - 95 or greater

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 or greater TSI)

Appendix A: Table 8aPage 30

Tier III Aesthetic Quality Assessments (Comparing S1 to WL data)

2013 VLMP Report

Aesthetic Quality Use Rating

Data

Set

Lake

CodeLake/County

NVSS

(mg/L)Plant Cover TSISD TSITP TSICHL NVSS

Plant

CoverTSISD TSITP TSICHL TSISD TSITP TSICHL

S1 RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0 5% to 25% 61.5 59.4 67.4 0 7.5 61.5 59.4 67.4 69 67 75 Fair

WL RMJ Apple Canyon/Jo Daviess 0 5% to 25% 61.7 62.5 67.4 0 7.5 61.7 62.5 67.4 69 70 75 Fair

S1 REZG Bertinetti/Christian 6 Less Than 5% 69.8 75.2 69.7 5 0 69.8 75.2 69.7 75 80 75 Fair

WL REZG Bertinetti/Christian 6 Less Than 5% 70.9 79.0 71.9 5 0 70.9 79.0 71.9 76 84 77 Fair

S1 RDO Bloomington/McLean 4.5 Less Than 5% 66.0 68.4 70.6 5 0 66.0 68.4 70.6 71 73 76 Fair

WL RDO Bloomington/McLean 4.5 Less Than 5% 67.1 70.0 67.5 5 0 67.1 70.0 67.5 72 75 73 Fair

S1 RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 8 Less Than 5% 72.1 70.4 72.4 10 0 72.1 70.4 72.4 82 80 82 Fair

WL RBC Charleston SCR/Coles 8 Less Than 5% 72.1 70.3 71.4 10 0 72.1 70.3 71.4 82 80 81 Fair

S1 SDA Evergreen/McLean 1.5 Less Than 5% 61.3 56.4 59.4 0 0 61.3 56.4 59.4 61 56 59 Good

WL SDA Evergreen/McLean 1.5 Less Than 5% 66.5 60.1 62.4 0 0 66.5 60.1 62.4 67 60 62 Fair

S1 RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0 5% To 15% 58.6 56.6 57.6 0 7.5 58.6 56.6 57.6 66 64 65 Fair

WL RMM Galena/Jo Daviess 0 5% To 15% 58.9 57.3 59.1 0 7.5 58.9 57.3 59.1 66 65 67 Fair

S1 RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0 Less Than 5% 57.1 51.1 57.5 0 0 57.1 51.1 57.5 57 51 57 Good

WL RNZD Herrin Old/Williamson 0 Less Than 5% 57.1 50.0 56.8 0 0 57.1 50.0 56.8 57 50 57 Good

S1 RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0 51% To 70% 46.4 45.8 43.6 0 15 46.4 45.8 43.6 61 61 59 Fair

WL RTZV Killarney/McHenry 0 51% To 70% 46.4 45.8 43.9 0 15 46.4 45.8 43.9 61 61 59 Fair

S1 REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 2 Less Than 5% 66.0 57.0 62.5 0 0 66.0 57.0 62.5 66 57 62 Fair

WL REG Lake of the Woods/Champaign 2 Less Than 5% 66.5 61.4 64.2 0 0 66.5 61.4 64.2 67 61 64 Fair

S1 RCE Sara/Effingham 0 Less Than 5% 61.3 58.7 60.0 0 0 61.3 58.7 60.0 61 59 60 Fair

WL RCE Sara/Effingham 0 Less Than 5% 63.0 60.8 61.9 0 0 63.0 60.8 61.9 63 61 62 Fair

S1 RTW Silver/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 48.4 48.7 51.8 0 15 48.4 48.7 51.8 63 64 67 Fair

WL RTW Silver/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 52.6 50.6 48.7 0 15 52.6 50.6 48.7 68 66 64 Fair

S1 RDR Spring/McDonough 2 Less Than 5% 69.8 76.1 71.5 0 0 69.8 76.1 71.5 70 76 72 Fair

WL RDR Spring/McDonough 2 Less Than 5% 73.9 79.2 72.0 0 0 73.9 79.2 72.0 74 79 72 Fair

S1 REF Springfield/Sangamon 4 5% to 25% 69.4 85.3 65.5 5 7.5 69.4 85.3 65.5 82 98 78 Fair

WL REF Springfield/Sangamon 4 5% to 25% 76.0 85.3 66.5 5 7.5 76.0 85.3 66.5 88 98 79 Fair

S1 WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0 5% to 25% 36.0 20.0 29.7 0 7.5 36.0 20.0 29.7 43 27 37 Good

WL WTJ Three Oaks North/McHenry 0 5% to 25% 39.1 20.0 29.5 0 7.5 39.1 20.0 29.5 47 27 37 Good

S1 WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 31.2 27.4 38.1 0 15 31.2 27.4 38.1 46 42 53 Good

WL WTG Three Oaks South/McHenry 0 26% to 50% 32.8 27.4 34.4 0 15 32.8 27.4 34.4 48 42 49 Good

Tier 3 Derived Lake Data Points Assigned Score

Appendix A: Table 8aPage 31

Tier III Aesthetic Quality Assessments (Comparing S1 to WL data)

2013 VLMP Report

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI) Good Aesthetic Quality Rating - Good - Less than 60

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI) Fair Aesthetic Quality Rating - Fair - 60 to 90

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI) Poor Aesthetic Quality Rating - Poor - 90 or greater

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 or greater TSI)

S1 Data set using Tier III site 1 data only.

WL Data set using all Tier III data.

Appendix A: Table 8bPage 32

Tier II Aesthetic Quality Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aesthetic Quality Use

Lake

CodeLake/County

NVSS

(mg/L)Plant Cover TSISD TSITP TSICHL NVSS

Plant

CoverTSISD TSITP TSICHL TSISD TSITP TSICHL

RCJ Altamont New/Effingham 2.5 Less Than 5% 60.0 76.6 58.2 0 0 60.0 76.6 58.2 60 77 58 Fair

RPJ Bass/Lee 2.0 5% to 25% 64.9 68.4 68.9 0 7.5 64.9 68.4 68.9 72 76 76 Fair

SEB Bird's Pond/Sangamon 1.0 5% To 15% 62.1 67.8 58.8 0 7.5 62.1 67.8 58.8 70 75 66 Fair

RCB Borah/Richland 0 Less Than 5% 68.4 69.2 27.9 0 0 68.4 69.2 27.9 68 69 28 Fair

SGC Buffalo Creek/Lake 2.5 26% to 50% 71.3 67.2 59.6 0 15 71.3 67.2 59.6 86 82 75 Fair

RPV Candlewick/Boone 0 5% to 25% 59.8 59.8 63.1 0 7.5 59.8 59.8 63.1 67 67 71 Fair

RDD Canton/Fulton 3.0 Less Than 5% 53.2 58.6 57.0 5 0 53.2 58.6 57.0 58 64 62 Fair

RNI Carbondale/Jackson 3.0 Less Than 5% 82.1 67.6 5 0 82.1 67.6 87 73 Fair

RNE Cedar/Jackson 0 Less Than 5% 56.6 44.1 51.3 0 0 56.6 44.1 51.3 57 44 51 Good

RGR Charles/DuPage 2.0 5% to 25% 63.4 82.5 64.5 0 7.5 63.4 82.5 64.5 71 90 72 Fair

WDK Civic/Grundy 0 Less Than 5% 25.1 27.4 36.3 0 0 25.1 27.4 36.3 25 27 36 Good

VTZH Crystal/McHenry 0 5% to 25% 43.1 44.1 57.9 0 7.5 43.1 44.1 57.9 51 52 65 Good

REE Dawson/McLean 1.5 Less Than 5% 54.7 50.9 62.5 0 0 54.7 50.9 62.5 55 51 62 Good

REA Decatur/Macon 10.0 Less Than 5% 70.5 71.7 67.0 10 0 70.5 71.7 67.0 80 82 77 Fair

WGZK Deep Quarry/DuPage 0 26% to 50% 32.2 38.7 40.2 0 15 32.2 38.7 40.2 47 54 55 Good

VTD Deep/Lake 0.5 5% to 25% 38.5 46.6 48.5 0 7.5 38.5 46.6 48.5 46 54 56 Good

RNJ Devils Kitchen/Williamson 0 26% to 50% 44.0 37.4 0 15 44.0 37.4 59 52 Good

RGB Diamond/Lake 1.5 26% to 50% 51.9 54.3 49.6 0 15 51.9 54.3 49.6 67 69 65 Fair

RGV Druce/Lake 0.5 26% to 50% 40.3 37.4 47.5 0 15 40.3 37.4 47.5 55 52 63 Good

VTT Fischer/Lake 3.5 26% To 40% 68.4 75.0 68.0 5 15 68.4 75.0 68.0 88 95 88 Fair

RGZG Forest/Lake 4.5 Less Than 5% 64.4 63.4 55.1 5 0 64.4 63.4 55.1 69 68 60 Fair

ROP Governor Bond/Bond 2.0 Less Than 5% 71.7 77.3 70.1 0 0 71.7 77.3 70.1 72 77 70 Fair

ROZA Highland Silver/Madison 5.0 Less Than 5% 71.3 81.4 60.9 5 0 71.3 81.4 60.9 76 86 66 Fair

RBO Homer/Champaign 2.5 Less Than 5% 62.8 59.7 66.6 0 0 62.8 59.7 66.6 63 60 67 Fair

RTZU Honey/Lake 0.5 5% to 25% 55.2 58.6 71.6 0 7.5 55.2 58.6 71.6 63 66 79 Fair

VGI Leopold/Lake 0 51% To 70% 45.5 52.7 49.7 0 15 45.5 52.7 49.7 60 68 65 Fair

RGU Loch Lomond/Lake 2.0 Less Than 5% 66.5 75.0 68.9 0 0 66.5 75.0 68.9 67 75 69 Fair

RTJ Long/Lake 4.5 5% to 25% 63.4 68.9 68.4 5 7.5 63.4 68.9 68.4 76 81 81 Fair

RHZK Longmeadow/Cook 0.5 26% to 50% 59.8 65.9 62.3 0 15 59.8 65.9 62.3 75 81 77 Fair

RCF Mattoon/Shelby 4.0 Less Than 5% 74.9 71.9 68.3 5 0 74.9 71.9 68.3 80 77 73 Fair

RNZI Miller/Jefferson 0.5 Less Than 5% 64.9 62.5 66.7 0 0 64.9 62.5 66.7 65 62 67 Fair

Representative Site Derived Lake Data Points Assigned Score

Rating

Appendix A: Table 8bPage 33

Tier II Aesthetic Quality Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aesthetic Quality Use

Lake

CodeLake/County

NVSS

(mg/L)Plant Cover TSISD TSITP TSICHL NVSS

Plant

CoverTSISD TSITP TSICHL TSISD TSITP TSICHL

Representative Site Derived Lake Data Points Assigned Score

Rating

RGZD Miltmore/Lake 0 51% To 70% 46.7 44.6 42.7 0 15 46.7 44.6 42.7 62 60 58 Fair

RCC Olney East Fork/Richland 0 Less Than 5% 59.8 56.2 67.8 0 0 59.8 56.2 67.8 60 56 68 Fair

SDZW Ossami/Tazewell 2.5 51% To 70% 61.3 75.1 62.6 0 15 61.3 75.1 62.6 76 90 78 Fair

RDF Otter/Macoupin 0 Less Than 5% 67.7 58.6 71.6 0 0 67.7 58.6 71.6 68 59 72 Fair

RCG Paradise/Coles 4.0 Less Than 5% 76.0 73.3 75.1 5 0 76.0 73.3 75.1 81 78 80 Fair

RNH Pinckneyville/Perry 0.5 Less Than 5% 62.3 73.5 0 0 62.3 73.5 62 74 Fair

RNZG Spring Arbor/Jackson 0 Less Than 5% 52.3 52.2 60.7 0 0 52.3 52.2 60.7 52 52 61 Good

UGV Spring Ledge/Lake 0 51% To 70% 50.1 54.6 50.6 0 15 50.1 54.6 50.6 65 70 66 Fair

SGW Stephen/Will 3.5 5% to 25% 58.1 76.8 69.5 5 7.5 58.1 76.8 69.5 71 89 82 Fair

RPI Summerset/Winnebago 0 Less Than 5% 53.5 53.2 53.5 0 0 53.5 53.2 53.5 53 53 53 Good

REZN Sunset/Champaign 0.5 Less Than 5% 49.1 35.0 44.2 0 0 49.1 35.0 44.2 49 35 44 Good

UDH Sunset/Macoupin 4.0 Less Than 5% 66.5 73.5 65.5 5 0 66.5 73.5 65.5 72 79 70 Fair

RGZF Sylvan/Lake 3.5 Less Than 5% 61.9 59.4 63.1 5 0 61.9 59.4 63.1 67 64 68 Fair

REC Taylorville/Christian 10.0 Less Than 5% 67.1 86.2 63.6 10 0 67.1 86.2 63.6 77 96 74 Fair

RTZQ Timber/Lake 0 5% to 25% 56.6 59.4 56.9 0 7.5 56.6 59.4 56.9 64 67 64 Fair

RTZF Tower/Lake 3.0 5% to 25% 64.4 71.0 61.5 5 7.5 64.4 71.0 61.5 77 83 74 Fair

REZL Twin Oaks/Champaign 9.5 Less Than 5% 78.4 80.0 72.1 10 0 78.4 80.0 72.1 88 90 82 Fair

RGZM Valley/Lake 0.5 5% to 25% 61.1 63.2 59.3 0 7.5 61.1 63.2 59.3 69 71 67 Fair

RBD Vermilion/Vermilion 4.0 5% To 15% 65.7 70.8 71.3 5 7.5 65.7 70.8 71.3 78 83 84 Fair

RCA Vernor/Richland 0 Less Than 5% 56.6 74.8 23.8 0 0 56.6 74.8 23.8 57 75 24 Good

RPZK Westlake/Winnebago 2.0 Less Than 5% 65.7 72.8 66.6 0 0 65.7 72.8 66.6 66 73 67 Fair

RTZC Wonder/McHenry 8.5 Less Than 5% 71.7 81.3 78.7 10 0 71.7 81.3 78.7 82 91 89 Fair

RPM Woodhaven/Lee 1.0 5% To 15% 59.1 70.1 64.1 0 7.5 59.1 70.1 64.1 67 78 72 Fair

RTZZ Woods Creek/McHenry 1.0 Less Than 5% 60.1 60.8 62.0 0 0 60.1 60.8 62.0 60 61 62 Fair

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI) Good Aesthetic Quality Rating - Good - Less than 60

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI) Fair Aesthetic Quality Rating - Fair - 60 to 90

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI) Poor Aesthetic Quality Rating - Poor - 90 or greater

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 or greater TSI)

Appendix A: Table 8cPage 34

Tier I Aesthetic Quality Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aesthetic Quality Use

Lake

CodeLake/County Plant Cover TSI

SD NVSS

Low

NVSS

High

Plant

CoverTSI

SD TSISD

Low

TSISD

High

RTT Antioch/Lake Less Than 5% 53.5 0 15 0 53.5 53 68 Good to Fair

RTG Bangs/Lake 26% to 50% 45.5 0 15 15 45.5 60 75 Fair

RTZT Barrington/Lake 5% to 25% 56.3 0 15 7.5 56.3 64 79 Fair

RDW Beaver/Grundy 5% to 25% 44.7 0 15 7.5 44.7 52 67 Good to Fair

RPK Black Oak/Lee 5% To 15% 66.3 0 15 7.5 66.3 74 89 Fair

STJ Campton/Kane 5% to 25% 73.0 0 15 7.5 73.0 80 95 Fair

RNZH Campus/Jackson Less Than 5% 63.7 0 15 0 63.7 64 79 Fair

RTD Catherine/Lake 26% to 50% 63.7 0 15 15 63.7 79 94 Fair

RTI Channel/Lake 26% to 50% 66.5 0 15 15 66.5 82 97 Fair

VTZ Charlotte/Kane Less Than 5% 43.2 0 15 0 43.2 43 58 Good

SNA Chautauqua/Jackson Less Than 5% 67.1 0 15 0 67.1 67 82 Fair

RGQ Countryside/Lake Greater Than 70% 60.5 0 15 15 60.5 76 91 Fair

RGZA Crooked/Lake Less Than 5% 65.7 0 15 0 65.7 66 81 Fair

RTZG Duck/Lake Greater Than 70% 56.6 0 15 15 56.6 72 87 Fair

RTM East Loon/Lake 26% to 50% 62.8 0 15 15 62.8 78 93 Fair

SDS Eureka/Woodford Less Than 5% 68.4 0 15 0 68.4 68 83 Fair

RMF Fish Trap/Jo Daviess 5% To 15% 79.7 0 15 7.5 79.7 87 102 Fair

RGZC Fourth/Lake Greater Than 70% 61.3 0 15 15 61.3 76 91 Fair

RLH Fyre/Mercer Less Than 5% 52.6 0 15 0 52.6 53 68 Good to Fair

RGI Gages/Lake 51% To 70% 50.4 0 15 15 50.4 65 80 Fair

RJZK Gamlin/St. Clair 5% To 15% 63.0 0 15 7.5 63.0 70 85 Fair

RTZS Goose/Grundy Less Than 5% 60.1 0 15 0 60.1 60 75 Fair

RTQ Grass/Lake Less Than 5% 73.4 0 15 0 73.4 73 88 Fair

RGK Grays/Lake 26% to 50% 59.1 0 15 15 59.1 74 89 Fair

RAI Harrisburg/Saline No Selection 71.3 0 15 71.3 71 86 Fair

RNZC Herrin New/Williamson Less Than 5% 61.3 0 15 0 61.3 61 76 Fair

WGZY Indian/Cook Less Than 5% 53.9 0 15 0 53.9 54 69 Good to Fair

RTZI Island/Lake 5% to 25% 69.8 0 15 7.5 69.8 77 92 Fair

RDI Jacksonville/Morgan Less Than 5% 61.3 0 15 0 61.3 61 76 Fair

RNU Jaycee/Jefferson Less Than 5% 59.4 0 15 0 59.4 59 74 Good to Fair

WGZX Joliet Jr. College/Will 26% to 50% 54.4 0 15 15 54.4 69 84 Fair

RNC Kinkaid/Jackson 5% to 25% 51.9 0 15 7.5 51.9 59 74 Good to Fair

STM La Fox Pond/Kane 26% to 50% 61.3 0 15 15 61.3 76 91 Fair

RAL Lake of Egypt/Williamson 26% to 50% 55.7 0 15 15 55.7 71 86 Fair

UTZ Lake of the Hollow/Lake 51% To 70% 46.6 0 15 15 46.6 62 77 Fair

STG Leisure/Lake Less Than 5% 69.8 0 15 0 69.8 70 85 Fair

UDC Lincoln/Grundy Less Than 5% 28.9 0 15 0 28.9 29 44 Good

RGC Linden/Lake 26% to 50% 53.9 0 15 15 53.9 69 84 Fair

STC Little Silver/Lake 26% to 50% 46.3 0 15 15 46.3 61 76 Fair

VTZJ Louise/Lake Less Than 5% 76.5 0 15 0 76.5 77 92 Fair

WGZZ Loveless/DuPage 51% To 70% 71.7 0 15 15 71.7 87 102 Fair

SDL Mauvaise Terre/Morgan Less Than 5% 77.1 0 15 0 77.1 77 92 Fair

RAZA McLeansboro/Hamilton Less Than 5% 71.3 0 15 0 71.3 71 86 Fair

RGP Minear/Lake Less Than 5% 45.5 0 15 0 45.5 45 60 Good to Fair

Tier 1 Derived Lake Data Points Assigned ScoreRating or

Range

Appendix A: Table 8cPage 35

Tier I Aesthetic Quality Assessments 2013 VLMP Report

Aesthetic Quality Use

Lake

CodeLake/County Plant Cover TSI

SD NVSS

Low

NVSS

High

Plant

CoverTSI

SD TSISD

Low

TSISD

High

Tier 1 Derived Lake Data Points Assigned ScoreRating or

Range

RND Murphysboro/Jackson 5% to 25% 66.8 0 15 7.5 66.8 74 89 Fair

STO Napa Suwe/Lake Less Than 5% 82.1 0 15 0 82.1 82 97 Fair

RNZO New Thompson/Jackson 5% to 25% 60.1 0 15 7.5 60.1 68 83 Fair

RTUA Nippersink/Lake 5% to 25% 72.1 0 15 7.5 72.1 80 95 Fair

RBL Paris Twin East/Edgar Less Than 5% 67.7 0 15 0 67.7 68 83 Fair

RBX Paris Twin West/Edgar Less Than 5% 72.5 0 15 0 72.5 73 88 Fair

REL Petersburg/Menard Less Than 5% 53.0 0 15 0 53.0 53 68 Good to Fair

RPC Pierce/Winnebago 5% To 15% 75.4 0 15 7.5 75.4 83 98 Fair

RPZB Pine/Lee 5% To 15% 60.0 0 15 7.5 60.0 67 82 Fair

RPZI Richardson Wildlife/Lee 51% To 70% 65.7 0 15 15 65.7 81 96 Fair

RTH Round/Lake 5% to 25% 51.5 0 15 7.5 51.5 59 74 Good to Fair

RGM Sand/Lake 5% to 25% 65.4 0 15 7.5 65.4 73 88 Fair

RPL Sunset/Lee Less Than 5% 62.1 0 15 0 62.1 62 77 Fair

RGW Third/Lake 26% to 50% 48.6 0 15 15 48.6 64 79 Fair

SGB Virginia/Cook Less Than 5% 34.2 0 15 0 34.2 34 49 Good

WGS Waterford/Lake Greater Than 70% 45.5 0 15 15 45.5 60 75 Fair

RTZB West Loon/Lake 26% to 50% 44.7 0 15 15 44.7 60 75 Fair

RTS Zurich/Lake 5% to 25% 48.1 0 15 7.5 48.1 56 71 Good to Fair

TSI Oligotrophic (Less than 40 TSI) Good Aesthetic Quality Rating - Good - Less than 60

TSI Mesotrophic (40 to 50 TSI) Fair Aesthetic Quality Rating - Fair - 60 to 90

TSI Eutrophic (50 to 70 TSI) Poor Aesthetic Quality Rating - Poor - 90 or greater

TSI Hypereutrophic (70 or greater TSI)

Appendix A: Tables 9a and 9bPage 36

Potential Benchmark Goals for Nutients

2013 VLMP Report

Table 9a: Total Nitrogen

BenchmarksTN (mg/L) TSI

TN Trophic State

Acute Effects Observed* 10 87.7 Hypereutrophic

Blue Green Algae Blooms 1.47 60.0 Eutrophic

Chronic Effects Observed* 1.00 54.5 Eutrophic

Target Range (upper) 1.00 54.5 Eutrophic

Target Range (lower) 0.50 44.4 Mesotrophic

*Observed in sensitive species.

Table 9b: Total Phosphorus

BenchmarksTP (mg/L) TSI

TP Trophic State

Illinois Water Quality Standard* 0.050 60.6 Eutrophic

Target Range (upper) 0.040 57.3 Eutrophic

Target Range (lower) 0.010 37.4 Oligotrophic

*In lakes greater than 20 acres.

Total Phosphorus (USEPA 2000)

EPA Ecoregion VI

Appendix A: Table 10Page 37

Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution

2013 VLMP Report

CategoriesAgricul-

ture

Construc-

tion

Urban

Runoff

Hydrologic

Modification

Resource

Extraction

Ground-

waterWetlands

Practices Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority

Access Roads Low Low Low Low Low --- ---

Aeration/Destratification Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium --- ---

Aquatic Vegetation Re-

establishmentLow --- Medium Medium Low Low High

Artificial Circulation Low Low Medium Low Medium Low Low

Barley Straw Addition Low Low Medium Low Low --- ---

Barriers to Diver Runoff from

Resource Extraction Work SitesLow Low Low Low High Low Low

Bioengineering Stabilization

PracticesHigh High High High High High High

Biorentention Practices High High High High High High High

Bioswale High High High High High High High

Bottom Feeding Fish Species

EradicationLow --- Low Low --- --- Low

Bottom Sealing Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium --- Medium

Brush Management Low Low Low Low Low --- Medium

Buffer Strips High High High High High High High

Catchment Basins High High High High High High High

Channel Vegetation Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Check Dams High High High High High --- ---

Cistern Medium --- Medium Medium Medium --- Medium

Clearing and Snagging Low Low Low Medium Low --- Low

Compost Facility Low Low Low Low Low --- ---

Concrete Collection Pit High High High High High High High

Confinement Pens High --- --- --- --- --- ---

Conservation Cover High High High High High High High

Conservation Cropping Systems High --- --- --- --- --- High

Conservation Reserve Programs High --- High --- --- --- High

Conservation Tillage High --- --- --- --- --- High

Constructed Wetlands High High High High High High High

Contour Farming High --- --- --- --- --- High

Contour Orchard and Other Fruit

AreaLow --- Low --- --- Low Low

Cover and Green Manure Crop Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium --- Medium

Critical Area Planting High High High High High High High

Dam, Diversion Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Dam, Floodwater Retarding Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Dam, Multiple Use Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Dam, Removal Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Deferred Grazing High --- --- --- --- --- ---

Detention Basins, Dry or Wet High High High High High High High

Dewatering Practices Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium ---

Discharge Flow Regulation High High High High High High High

Diversions Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Dike High High High High High High High

Dike Floodway Channel Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Ditch Stabilization High High High High High High High

Appendix A: Table 10Page 38

Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution

2013 VLMP Report

CategoriesAgricul-

ture

Construc-

tion

Urban

Runoff

Hydrologic

Modification

Resource

Extraction

Ground-

waterWetlands

Practices Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority

Dredging, Retention Site

Development ReclamationLow Low Low Low Low Low Low

Earth Dike Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Earthen Storage Basins Low Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Medium

Downspouts and Gutters Medium --- Medium Medium --- --- Medium

Erosion Control Plantings High High High High High High High

Farmstead and Feedlot Windbreak Medium --- --- --- --- --- ---

Fences High High High --- --- --- ---

Field Borders High High High High High High High

Filter Strips High High High High High High High

Flow Diversion Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Forest Fertilization Low --- Low Low --- --- ---

Forest Management High High High High High High High

Gabions/Wire Mattresses High High High High High High High

Grade Stabilization Structures High High High High High High High

Grass Waterway (W/or w/o Swale

& Outlet GreenHigh High High High High High High

Grass-Lined Channels High High High High High High High

Green Roofs High --- High High --- High High

Groundwater Recharge Area

ProtectionHigh High High High High High High

Heavy Use Area Protection High High High High High High High

Holding Pond/Settling Basin High High High High High High High

Hypolimnetic Aeration Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Hypolimnetic Withdrawal Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Impoundment Structure High High High High High High High

Inlet Protection Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Infiltration Practices High High High High High High High

Irrigation Water Management Medium Medium High Medium Low Low Low

Information/Education High High High High High High High

Irrigation Water Management Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Lagoons High High High High High High High

Land Application Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Land Grading Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Land Reconstruction/Reclamation Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Land Use Change High High High High High High High

Landscaping Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Leachate Collection Systems High High High High High High High

Level Spreader Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Liming Medium --- Medium --- Medium --- ---

Limited Clearing & Snagging Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium --- ---

Lined Waterway or Outlet Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Livestock Exclusion High --- --- --- --- --- ---

Livestock Shade Structure Medium --- --- --- --- --- ---

Macrophyte Harvesting Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Appendix A: Table 10Page 39

Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution

2013 VLMP Report

CategoriesAgricul-

ture

Construc-

tion

Urban

Runoff

Hydrologic

Modification

Resource

Extraction

Ground-

waterWetlands

Practices Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority

Mixing/Loading Pads Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium --- ---

Monitoring Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Mud/Dust Control Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Mulching Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Nutrient Management High High High High High High High

Nutrient Management Plans High High High High High High High

Oil and Grit Separator Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium --- ---

On-Site Treatment System

CorrectionMedium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Open Channel

Construction/ImprovementHigh High High High High High High

Open Gutter Systems Medium --- Medium Medium --- --- Medium

Open Space Land Acquisition Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Outlet Protection High High High High High High High

Outside Concrete Collection

SystemsHigh High High High High High High

Oxidation Ditch Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Pasture/Hayland Management &

PlantingHigh --- --- --- --- High High

Pasture Protection High --- --- --- --- High High

Pasture Rotation High --- --- --- --- High High

Paved Waterways Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Pesticide Application Certification

and TrainingMedium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Pest Management Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Prescribed Burning Medium Medium Medium Medium --- --- Medium

Phosphorus Inactivation Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Planned Grazing Systems High --- --- --- --- High High

Planning/Administration Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Pond Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Pond Sealing or Lining Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Porous Pavement Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Portable Sediment Tank Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Prairie Restoration Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Protect Existing Vegetation Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Rain Barrel Medium --- Medium Medium --- Medium Medium

Rain Garden Medium --- Medium Medium --- Medium Medium

Recessed Street Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Recreation Area Improvement Low Low Low Low Low Low High

Regeneration/Reforestation Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Regulations Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Replace Leaking Storage Tanks Medium Medium Medium --- Medium Medium Medium

Reshape Banks/Sideslopes High High High High High High High

Retention Basin High High High High High High High

Retards & Jetties High High High High High High High

Revegetated Riparian

Zone/CorridorHigh High High High High High High

Appendix A: Table 10Page 40

Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution

2013 VLMP Report

CategoriesAgricul-

ture

Construc-

tion

Urban

Runoff

Hydrologic

Modification

Resource

Extraction

Ground-

waterWetlands

Practices Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority

Rip Rap High High High High High High ---

Rock Barrier High High High High High High High

Rock Outlet Protection High High High High High High High

Rock Outlets High High High High High High High

Roof Runoff Management High High High High High High High

Runoff Control High High High High High High High

Sand Filters Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Sealing Bore Holes High High High --- High High High

Sediment Traps/Basins High High High High High High High

Seeding High High High High High High High

Sediment Oxidation Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Shading and Sediment Covers Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Sinkhole Stabilization Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Silt Fence Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Site Evaluation Requirements Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Spillway Restoration Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Sodding Medium Medium Medium Medium --- Medium ---

Soil Testing/Nutrient Management High High High High High High High

Spray Nozzle Refinements High --- High --- --- --- ---

Stabilized Construction Entrance

Stacking AreaMedium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Storm Drain Inlet Protection Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Stacking Area Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Staging of Clearing, Grubbing,

Scalping, Grading and

Reclamation Activities

Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Stock Trails and Walkways Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Straw Bale Dike Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Stream Channel Restoration High High High High High High High

Stream Channel Stabilization High High High High High High High

Streambank and Shoreline

Protection/StabilizationHigh High High High High High High

Street Sweeping --- Medium Medium --- --- --- ---

Strip Cropping (Contour) High --- High --- High High ---

Subsurface Drainage High High High High High High High

Surface Drainage High High High High High High High

Sustainable Management Practices High High High High High High High

Swale High High High High High High High

Technical Assistance High High High High High High High

Temporary Vegetative Cover High High High High High High High

Terraces High High High High High High High

Topsoiling Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium --- ---

Toxic Salt Reduction High High High High High High High

Tree Planting Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Trenches and Ponds Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Appendix A: Table 10Page 41

Best Management Practices to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution

2013 VLMP Report

CategoriesAgricul-

ture

Construc-

tion

Urban

Runoff

Hydrologic

Modification

Resource

Extraction

Ground-

waterWetlands

Practices Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority

Triple Rinsing Pesticide Containers Medium Medium Medium --- Medium Medium Medium

Trough or Tank Medium Medium Medium --- Medium Medium ---

Underground Outlet Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Urban Filter Strip --- High High High High High High

Urban Stormwater Wetlands --- High High High High High High

Vegetative Bank Stabilization High High High High High High High

Vegetative Buffers High High High High High High High

Vegetative Filter Strips High High High High High High High

Vegetative Deflectors High High High High High High High

Vegetative Management High High High High High High High

Vegetative Removal Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Vegetative Stabilization High High High High High High High

Vegetative Swale High High High High High High High

Vegetative Protection/Soil

StabilizationHigh High High High High High High

Waste Application (Application on

Land)Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Waste Water Recovery High High High High High High High

Waste Management System High High High High High High High

Waste Storage Lagoons/Ponds

(various)Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Waste Storage/Control Structures High High High High High High High

Water Level Drawdown/Refilling Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Water/Sediment Control Basins High High High High High High High

Water Harvesting Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

Well Sealing High High High High High High High

Well Setback Zones High High High High High High High

Well Site Protection High High High High High High High

Wetland Acquisition High High High High High High High

Wetland Creation High High High High High High High

Wetland Protection High High High High High High High

Wetland Restoration High High High High High High High

Wildlife Plantings High High High High High High High

Wildlife Upland Habitat

ManagementHigh High High High High High High

Wildlife Wetland Habitat

ManagementHigh High High High High High High

Willow Spikes High High High High High High Low

Windbreaks (Field, Farmstead,

Feedlots)Medium --- Medium --- Medium --- ---

Winter Feed Station High --- --- --- --- High High

Woodland Improvement High High High High High High High

Woodland and Pruning High High High High High High High

Zoning High High High High High High High

Appendix A: Table 11Page 42

Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution 2007 thru 2013

2013 VLMP Report

Lake/CountyLake

CodeLatitude Longitude

Co

mm

on

Carp

Grass C

arp

Zebra M

ussel

Ru

sty Crayfish

Asian

Carp

Asian

Clam

Eurasian

Ru

ffe

Fishh

oo

k Waterflea

New

Zealand

Mu

dsn

ail

Qu

agga Mu

ssel

Spin

y Waterflea

Cu

rlyleaf Po

nd

weed

Eurasian

Waterm

ilfoil

Pu

rple Lo

osestrife

Hyd

rilla

Water H

yacinth

Flow

ering R

ush

Reed

Man

na G

rass

Altamont New/Effingham RCJ 39.031948 -88.714726 x xAntioch/Lake RTT 42.467781 -88.098059 x x x xApple Canyon/Jo Daviess RMJ 42.417100 -90.164100 x x x x x xAtwood/McHenry VTS 42.228892 -88.258893 x xBangs/Lake RTG 42.265281 -88.132227 x x x x xBarrington/Lake RTZT 42.221700 -88.147100 x xBass/Lee RPJ 41.654400 -89.287300 x x x x xBeaver/Grundy RDW 41.336800 -88.317300 x x x x xBeck/Cook RGE 42.075282 -87.872782 xBertinetti/Christian REZG 39.533297 -89.251344 x xBig Shadow/Will WDC 41.286633 -88.201330 xBird's Pond/Sangamon SEB 39.747067 -89.565557 xBlack Oak/Lee RPK 41.657500 -89.289500 x x x x xBloomington/McLean RDO 40.660567 -88.935553Bluff/Lake VTJ 42.452226 -88.127781 x x xBorah/Richland RCB 38.774390 -88.069800Buffalo Creek/Lake SGC 42.156979 -87.991331 x x xCampton/Kane STJ 41.952936 -88.410869 xCampus/Jackson RNZH 37.708892 -89.223059Candlewick/Boone RPV 42.348700 -88.865700 x x x xCanton/Fulton RDD 40.564200 -89.973560Carbondale/Jackson RNI 37.698892 -89.223615Catherine/Lake RTD 42.485838 -88.128337 x x x x x xCedar/Jackson RNE 37.666115 -89.280560 x xCedar/Lake RTK 42.419726 -88.090281 x x xChannel/Lake RTI 42.486392 -88.137503 x x x x x xCharles/DuPage RGR 41.815560 -87.958059 x xCharleston SCR/Coles RBC 39.470281 -88.143616 x x x xCharlotte/Kane VTZ 41.915560 -88.370480 xChautauqua/Jackson SNA 37.726300 -89.302200 x x xChicago Botanic Garden/Cook RHJA 42.141504 -87.786226 x x x x xChrista/Lake STU 42.351451 -88.151454 x xCivic/Grundy WDK 41.310278 -88.284441 x x

Appendix A: Table 11Page 43

Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution 2007 thru 2013

2013 VLMP Report

Lake/CountyLake

CodeLatitude Longitude

Co

mm

on

Carp

Grass C

arp

Zebra M

ussel

Ru

sty Crayfish

Asian

Carp

Asian

Clam

Eurasian

Ru

ffe

Fishh

oo

k Waterflea

New

Zealand

Mu

dsn

ail

Qu

agga Mu

ssel

Spin

y Waterflea

Cu

rlyleaf Po

nd

weed

Eurasian

Waterm

ilfoil

Pu

rple Lo

osestrife

Hyd

rilla

Water H

yacinth

Flow

ering R

ush

Reed

Man

na G

rass

Country/Menard REQ 39.963400 -89.746800 x x xCountryside/Lake RGQ 42.253006 -88.044047 x x x x xCrab Orchard/Williamson RNA 37.722226 -89.144448 x x xCrooked/Lake RGZA 42.422503 -88.051670 x x xCross/Lake UTV 42.491583 -88.085749 x x xCrystal/McHenry VTZH 42.233436 -88.354408 x x x xDawson/McLean REE 40.403610 -88.722810 xDecatur/Macon REA 39.824449 -88.952504 xDeep Quarry/DuPage WGZK 41.939727 -88.178615 x x x x xDeep/Lake VTD 42.428337 -88.066889 x x xDevils Kitchen/Williamson RNJ 37.641948 -89.105560Diamond/Lake RGB 42.250230 -88.007290 x x x x xDinosaur/Will WDF 41.284591 -88.208087 xDrake/Cass REZR 40.003640 -90.083240 xDruce/Lake RGV 42.366900 -88.005000 x x x x x xDuck/Lake RTZG 42.376115 -88.121393 x x xDunlap/Madison RJD 38.807400 -89.937500 x xDutchman/Johnson RAM 37.491290 -88.913890 xEast Loon/Lake RTM 42.453337 -88.073337 x x x xEureka/Woodford SDS 40.705003 -89.277505 x xEvergreen/McLean SDA 40.648770 -89.054650Fawn Ridge 1/Cook UHI 41.565632 -87.733848 xFawn Ridge 2/Cook UHJ 41.565524 -87.735151 xFawn Ridge 3/Cook UHK 41.564232 -87.735078 xFischer/Lake VTT 42.358059 -88.157503 x x x x x xFish Trap/Jo Daviess RMF 42.382781 -90.467781 x x x x x x xFish/Lake VTK 42.335004 -88.156949 x xForest/Lake RGZG 42.213038 -88.054505 x x x xFourth/Lake RGZC 42.392098 -88.031469 x x x x xFox/Lake RTF 42.405281 -88.166671 x x xFyre/Mercer RLH 41.296000 -90.488400 x x xGages/Lake RGI 42.351380 -87.999440 x x x xGalena/Jo Daviess RMM 42.400400 -90.349200 x x x

Appendix A: Table 11Page 44

Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution 2007 thru 2013

2013 VLMP Report

Lake/CountyLake

CodeLatitude Longitude

Co

mm

on

Carp

Grass C

arp

Zebra M

ussel

Ru

sty Crayfish

Asian

Carp

Asian

Clam

Eurasian

Ru

ffe

Fishh

oo

k Waterflea

New

Zealand

Mu

dsn

ail

Qu

agga Mu

ssel

Spin

y Waterflea

Cu

rlyleaf Po

nd

weed

Eurasian

Waterm

ilfoil

Pu

rple Lo

osestrife

Hyd

rilla

Water H

yacinth

Flow

ering R

ush

Reed

Man

na G

rass

Gamlin/St. Clair RJZK 38.598500 -90.019600 xGeorge/Rock Island RML 41.433420 -90.833030 xGoose/Grundy SDZB 41.341315 -88.310107 x x x x x x xGoose/McHenry RTZS 42.179900 -88.311600 x xGovernor Bond/Bond ROP 38.925940 -89.399040Grass/Lake RTQ 42.430559 -88.163337 x x x x xGrays/Lake RGK 42.342200 -88.048000 xGriswold/McHenry RTY 42.290003 -88.213892 x x x xHarrisburg/Saline RAI 37.835837 -88.590005Harrow Gate/Cook STA 42.115693 -88.122412 x xHawk/Will WDH 41.270567 -88.206529 xHeritage/Tazewell UDZJ 40.547785 -88.340428 x xHerrin New/Williamson RNZC 37.635800 -89.014460Herrin Old/Williamson RNZD 37.763059 -89.035559Highland Silver/Madison ROZA 38.766010 -89.698390 x xHighland/Lake RTZP 42.361115 -88.061671 x x xHighwood/McHenry STB 42.289840 -88.205560 x xHoliday Shores/Madison RJN 38.911164 -89.934564 x xHoliday/La Salle VTX 41.605500 -88.678600 x xHomer/Champaign RBO 40.060210 -87.984840 x xHoney/Lake RTZU 42.200600 -88.130100 x x x x xHuntley/Lake RGY 42.457360 -88.025759 x x xIndependence Grove/Lake SGH 42.312000 -87.952600 x x xIndian/Cook WGZY 41.832781 -87.840005Island/Lake RTZI 42.275281 -88.200838 x x x xJacksonville/Morgan RDI 39.672503 -90.212226Jaycee/Jefferson RNU 38.370281 -88.898617Joliet Jr. College/Will RTZV 41.500900 -88.185000 x xKillarney/McHenry RTZV 42.239450 -88.257290 x x xKinkaid/Jackson RNC 37.778836 -89.449500 x x x xLa Fox Pond/Kane STM 41.871560 -88.436560Lake of Egypt/Williamson RAL 37.620837 -88.943338 x x x xLake of the Hollow/Lake UTZ 42.365562 -88.183950 x x x

Appendix A: Table 11Page 45

Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution 2007 thru 2013

2013 VLMP Report

Lake/CountyLake

CodeLatitude Longitude

Co

mm

on

Carp

Grass C

arp

Zebra M

ussel

Ru

sty Crayfish

Asian

Carp

Asian

Clam

Eurasian

Ru

ffe

Fishh

oo

k Waterflea

New

Zealand

Mu

dsn

ail

Qu

agga Mu

ssel

Spin

y Waterflea

Cu

rlyleaf Po

nd

weed

Eurasian

Waterm

ilfoil

Pu

rple Lo

osestrife

Hyd

rilla

Water H

yacinth

Flow

ering R

ush

Reed

Man

na G

rass

Lake of the Woods/Champaign REG 40.200559 -88.381671 x x xLambert/DuPage SGG 41.857200 -88.078200 x xLe Aqua Na/Stephenson RPA 42.419410 -89.829930 x x xLeisure/Lake STG 42.436200 -88.185900 x xLeopold/Lake VGI 42.327082 -88.011318 x xLincoln/Grundy UDC 41.317348 -88.315116 x x x x xLinden/Lake RGC 42.420837 -88.028338 x xLittle Shadow/Will WDE 41.288308 -88.191078 xLittle Silver/Lake STC 42.473400 -88.074800 x x xLoch Lomond/Lake RGU 42.280600 -88.005100 x x x xLong/Lake RTJ 42.377781 -88.126115 x x x xLongmeadow/Cook RHZK 42.086309 -87.752877Lost Nation/Ogle RPZG 41.918423 -89.368541 x x x x xLouise/Lake VTZJ 42.160255 -88.114906 x x xLoveless/DuPage WGZZ 41.889110 -88.187290 xMaple/Cook RHD 41.714726 -87.887782 x x x x x xMarie/Lake RTR 42.462781 -88.134448 x xMattoon/Shelby RCF 39.334730 -88.482480Mauvaise Terre/Morgan SDL 39.720003 -90.214448McCullom/McHenry RTZD 42.361390 -88.288560 x xMcLeansboro New/Hamilton RAZA 38.084448 -88.553337Miller/Jefferson RNZI 38.396656 -88.892390 xMiltmore/Lake RGZD 42.396110 -88.041667 x x xMinear/Lake RGP 42.290317 -87.941458 x x x xMonee/Will RFH 41.388650 -87.761220 xMurphysboro/Jackson RND 37.773615 -89.380559 x xNapa Suwe/Lake STO 42.287042 -88.124777 x x x x xNew Thompson/Jackson RNZO 37.744167 -89.254722 x xNippersink/Lake RTUA 42.413060 -88.180559 x x x x xOlney East Fork/Richland RCC 38.761670 -88.076710Ossami/Tazewell SDZW 40.635586 -89.468316 xOtter/Macoupin RDF 39.408900 -89.911990 x x xParadise/Coles RCG 39.413120 -88.439630

Appendix A: Table 11Page 46

Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution 2007 thru 2013

2013 VLMP Report

Lake/CountyLake

CodeLatitude Longitude

Co

mm

on

Carp

Grass C

arp

Zebra M

ussel

Ru

sty Crayfish

Asian

Carp

Asian

Clam

Eurasian

Ru

ffe

Fishh

oo

k Waterflea

New

Zealand

Mu

dsn

ail

Qu

agga Mu

ssel

Spin

y Waterflea

Cu

rlyleaf Po

nd

weed

Eurasian

Waterm

ilfoil

Pu

rple Lo

osestrife

Hyd

rilla

Water H

yacinth

Flow

ering R

ush

Reed

Man

na G

rass

Pardum/Knox UDZH 40.740259 -89.987713 x xParis Twin East/Edgar RBL 39.630220 -87.677710Paris Twin West/Edgar RBX 39.635930 -87.694100Petersburg/Menard REL 39.988600 -89.850100 x xPetite/Lake VTW 42.429170 -88.131948 x x x x x x xPierce/Winnebago RPC 42.345330 -88.985100 x x x x xPinckneyville/Perry RHN 38.096670 -89.396671 x xPine/Lee RPZB 41.651800 -89.309500 x x x x x xPistakee/Lake RTU 42.381670 -88.199449 x x xPrairie/Cass REZP 39.995690 -90.058770 xRice/Knox RDC 40.949112 -90.325866 xRichardson Wildlife/Lee RPZI 41.715388 -89.188098Round/Lake RTH 42.361671 -88.076671 x x x x x xSalem/Marion ROR 38.641115 -88.945837 x xSanctuary Pond/DuPage SGX 41.854715 -88.195152 x x x x xSand/Lake RGM 42.412503 -88.043337 x x x xSara/Effingham RCE 39.126200 -88.618670 x xShadow/Henry RPZD 41.545800 -90.172500 x x xSilver/McHenry RTW 42.246650 -88.247460 x xSlocum/Lake RTP 42.260281 -88.188059 x xSpoon/Knox SDZH 40.951386 -90.126328 xSpring Arbor/Jackson RNZG 37.650281 -89.168893 x xSpring Ledge/Lake UGV 42.423260 -88.020624Spring North/Tazewell SDZM 40.492920 -89.830110 x xSpring South/Tazewell RDQ 40.441200 -89.898120 xSpring/Lake RGZT 42.445100 -88.126100 x x xSpring/McDonough RDR 40.506660 -90.717570Springfield/Sangamon REF 39.756115 -89.593616 xStephen/Will SGW 41.566400 -88.225981 x xSummerset/Winnebago RPI 42.448600 -89.384900 x x x x xSunset/Champaign REZN 40.181900 -88.423200 x xSunset/Lee RPL 41.647900 -89.293700 x x x x x xSunset/Macoupin UDH 39.436400 -89.855400 x x

Appendix A: Table 11Page 47

Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution 2007 thru 2013

2013 VLMP Report

Lake/CountyLake

CodeLatitude Longitude

Co

mm

on

Carp

Grass C

arp

Zebra M

ussel

Ru

sty Crayfish

Asian

Carp

Asian

Clam

Eurasian

Ru

ffe

Fishh

oo

k Waterflea

New

Zealand

Mu

dsn

ail

Qu

agga Mu

ssel

Spin

y Waterflea

Cu

rlyleaf Po

nd

weed

Eurasian

Waterm

ilfoil

Pu

rple Lo

osestrife

Hyd

rilla

Water H

yacinth

Flow

ering R

ush

Reed

Man

na G

rass

Sylvan/Lake RGZF 42.242147 -88.046133 x x x x xTaylorville/Christian REC 39.529448 -89.255838 xThird Shadow/Will WDD 41.283651 -88.202204 xThird/Lake RGW 42.370837 -88.014448 x x x x x xThree Oaks North/McHenry WTJ 42.223601 -88.302678 x xThree Oaks South/McHenry WTG 42.215852 -88.305410 x x xTimber/Lake RTZQ 42.240281 -88.127503 x x xTower/Lake RTZF 42.228185 -88.152374 x x xTully Monster/Will WDG 41.288228 -88.205731 x xTurnberry 1/McHenry SPA 42.217983 -88.386503 xTwin Oaks/Champaign REZL 40.213760 -88.375433 x x xValley/Lake RGZM 42.349920 -87.982673 xVermilion/Vermilion RBD 40.157400 -87.649100 xVernor/Richland RCA 38.763790 -88.102500 xVirginia/Cook SGB 42.146100 -87.945000 x xWaterford/Lake WGS 42.427200 -88.026400 x xWaverly/Morgan SDC 39.600837 -90.009170 xWee Ma Tuk/Fulton VDA 40.533220 -90.166110 xWeslake/St. Clair RJJ 38.595600 -90.029200 xWest Loon/Lake RTZB 42.452781 -88.083338 x x x x xWestlake/Winnebago RPZK 42.316337 -89.284705 x xWhite/Lake UGX 42.452028 -88.039653 x xWildwood/Marshall RDK 41.078559 -89.284450 xWillow Creek/Vermilion RBY 40.011475 -87.573732 xWillow/Stephenson RPZH 42.332711 -89.638531 x x xWonder/McHenry RTZC 42.375005 -88.354727 x xWoodhaven/Lee RPM 41.656600 -89.306100 x x x x xWoods Creek/McHenry RTZZ 42.180490 -88.318880 x xWooster/Lake RTZH 42.364448 -88.149449 x x x xZurich/Lake RTS 42.195003 -88.098337 x x x x x

111 59 39 17 12 2 1 1 1 1 1 103 89 21 17 6 3 1

Appendix A: Table 12Page 48

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Department of Laboratory

Data Qualifiers

2013 VLMP Report

Code Description

B1 The sample matrix caused possible effects on measurement. The result may be biased low.

B2 The sample matrix caused possible effects on measurement. The result may be biased high.

CValue calculated. Value reported was not measured directly, but was calculated from other available

data.

I See Case Narrative for more information.

JEstimated number. The laboratory cannot support the validity of this number. The result is between the

method detection limit and the reporting limit.

J1 Surrogate compound recovery limits have not been met.

J2 Internal Standard criteria were not met.

J3The reported value failed to meet the established quality control criteria for either precision or accuracy

possibly due to matrix effects.

J5 Blank Spike failed high, result was less than the reporting limit – impact on data may be minimal.

J6 Blank Spike failed high – possible high bias or false positive result.

J7 Blank Spike failed low – possible low bias or false non-detect result at the reporting limit.

LActual value not known, but known to be greater than value shown. Value shown is the highest

acceptable level for quantification.

M Presence of material verified (i.e., positive detection). Value is estimated

Q Maximum holding time exceeded.

S Test results provided by outside source.

VIndicates the analyte was detected in the associated method blank and was outside method blank

acceptance criteria.

XReported value should not be used. Some or all of the quality control data for the analyte were outside

acceptance criteria, or the presence/absence of the analyte cannot be determined from the data.

Y The laboratory analysis was performed on an unpreserved or improperly preserved sample.

# Results are not compliant with the NELAC standards.

* Non-NELAP accredited.

Revision 10/31/2011

Appendix A: Table 13Page 49

Identifying Potential Sources of Use Impairment

in Illinois Freshwater Lakes

2013 VLMP Report

Potential Source Guidelines

Acid Mine DrainageLow pH and iron deposition due to mine drainage based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.

AgricultureGeneral agricultural related activities based upon satellite land use,

actual observation and/or other existing data.

Animal Feeding Operations (NPS)Open area feedlots or animal holding buildings and impervious areas

based upon satellite land use, actual observation and/or other existing

data.Aquaculture (Not Permitted) or

Aquaculture (Permitted)

Fish production facility based upon actual observation and/or other

existing data.

Atmospheric Deposition – Acidity,

or Atmospheric Deposition –

Nitrogen, or Atmospheric

Deposition – Toxics

Atmospheric deposition of nutrients, minerals, etc based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.

ChannelizationStraightening of stream meanders based upon actual observation

and/or other existing data.

Combined Sewer OverflowsCombined sanitary and storm sewer overflow based upon Facility-

Related Stream Survey, Agency effluent monitoring, Discharge

Monitoring Reports and/or other existing data.

Contaminated SedimentsHigh concentrations of metals and organic compounds in sediment

based upon actual observation and/or other existing data.

Crop Production (Crop Land or

Dry Land)

Nonirrigated crop production based upon satellite land use, actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Dam Construction (Other than

Upstream Flood Control Projects)

Dam construction activities based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Discharges from Biosolids storage,

application or disposal

Storage, application or disposal of sludge based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Drainage/Filling/Loss of WetlandsDraining or filling in of wetland areas based upon actual observation

and/or other existing data.

Dredge MiningUnderwater mining (e.g., sand and gravel) activities based upon

satellite land use, actual observation and/or other existing data.Dredging (e.g., for Navigation

Channels)

Deepening of stream channels based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Golf Courses Golf course runoff directly to water

Habitat Modification - other than

Hydromodification

General alteration of riparian habitat based upon actual observation

and/or other existing dataHighway/Road/Bridge Runoff

(Nonconstruction Related)

Salt and pesticide runoff from highways, roads & bridges based upon

actual observation and/or other existing data.

Highways, Roads, Bridges,

Infrastructure (New Construction)

Highway/road/bridge construction activities based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Impacts from Abandoned Mine

Lands (Inactive)

Abandoned mining operation based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Appendix A: Table 13Page 50

Identifying Potential Sources of Use Impairment

in Illinois Freshwater Lakes

2013 VLMP Report

Potential Source Guidelines

Impacts from Hydrostructure Flow

Regulation/Modification

Alteration of normal flow regimes (e.g., dams, channelization,

impervious surfaces, water withdrawal) based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Inappropriate Waste DisposalIllegal waste disposal sites based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Industrial Land TreatmentLand application of industrial wastes based upon actual observation

and/or other existing data.

Industrial Point Source DischargeIndustrial point source discharge based upon Facility-Related Stream

Survey, Agency effluent, DMR and/or other existing data.

Irrigated Crop ProductionIrrigated crop production based upon satellite land use, actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Lake Fertilization

Artificial fertilization activities (e.g., addition of triple super-phosphate

to create algal blooms for macrophyte control or enhance lake fertility)

based upon actual observation and/or other existing data.

LandfillsLeachate and/or runoff from landfills based upon actual observation

and/or other existing data.Leaking Underground Storage

Tank Leaks

Leaks from storage tanks based upon actual observation and/or other

existing data.Livestock (Grazing or Feeding

Operations

Riparian and/or upland pastureland grazing based upon satellite land

use, actual observation and/or other existing data

Loss of Riparian HabitatRemoval of riparian vegetation based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Marina Boat Construction, or

Marina Boat Maintenance, or

Marina Dredging Operations, or

Marina Fueling Operations, or

Marina-related Shoreline Erosion,

or Marina/Boating Pumpout

releases, or Marina/Boating

Sanitary On-vessel Discharges

In-water and on-land releases based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Mill TailingsMilling operations based upon satellite land use, actual observation

and/or other existing data.

Mine TailingsMine processing activities (e.g., gob piles) based upon satellite land

use, actual observation and/or other existing data.

Municipal Point Source DischargesMunicipal point source discharge based upon Facility-Related Stream

Survey, Agency effluent, DMR and/or other existing data.

Natural Sources See source methodology.

On-site Treatment Systems (Septic

Systems and Similar Decentralized

Systems)

Septic system leachate or surface runoff based upon actual observation

and/or other existing data.

Other Recreational Pollution

Sources

Other recreational impacts based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Other Spill Related ImpactsAccidental spills based upon actual observation and/or other existing

data.

Appendix A: Table 13Page 51

Identifying Potential Sources of Use Impairment

in Illinois Freshwater Lakes

2013 VLMP Report

Potential Source Guidelines

Permitted Silvicultural ActivitiesGeneral forest management related runoff based upon satellite land

use, actual observation and/or other existing data.

Pesticide Application

Herbicide/algicide applications (e.g., eradication of a beneficial

macrophyte community, reduced dissolved oxygen. levels after

application) based upon actual observation and/or other existing data.

Petroleum/Natural Gas ActivitiesOil and gas production activities based upon satellite land use, actual

observation and/or other existing data.

RCRA Hazardous Waste SitesHazardous waste leachate or surface runoff based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Runoff from

Forest/Grassland/Parkland

Watershed related nonpoint source runoff other than from previously

specified sources (e.g., lawn or parkland fertilization, leaf litter/forest

bed runoff) based upon actual observation and/or other existing data.

Salt Storage SitesSalt storage for winter highway maintenance based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.Sanitary Sewer Overflows

(Collection System Failures)

Broken sanitary sewer line or overflow based upon Facility-Related

Stream Survey, Agency effluent and/or other existing data.

Septage DisposalDisposal of septic tank sludge based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data.

Site Clearance (Land Development

or Redevelopment)

New residential/commercial construction activities based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Source Unknown No identifiable source based upon available information.

Specialty Crop ProductionTruck farming, orchards, or horticultural areas based upon satellite

land use, actual observation and/or other existing data.Streambank

Modifications/Destabilization or

Littoral/Shore Area Modifications

(Nonriverine)

Shoreline modification/destabilization activities (e.g., bank erosion, rip

rap, loss of habitat) based upon actual observation and/or other

existing data.

Subsurface (Hardrock) MiningSubsurface coal mining activities based upon satellite land use, actual

observation and/or other existing data.

Surface MiningSurface mining (e.g., coal, limestone) activities based upon satellite

land use, actual observation and/or other existing data.Unpermitted Discharge (Domestic

Wastes)

Wildcat sewer discharge based upon Facility-Related Stream Survey,

Agency effluent and/or other existing data.Upstream Impoundments (e.g., Pl-

566 NRCS Structures)

Upstream impoundment based upon actual observation and/or other

existing data.

Urban Runoff/Storm SewersUrban and storm sewer runoff based upon actual observation and/or

other existing data

WaterfowlNutrient enrichment from waterfowl wastes based upon actual

observation and/or other existing data.