application example: quality control aerospace: 3d

6
Copyright © 2008 GOM mbH All rights reserved! Rev. A (en) 05052008 www.gom.com 1 Application Example: Quality Control Aerospace: 3D Digitizing of the X-38 Space Vehicle Measuring Systems: ATOS, TRITOP CMM Keywords: Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD), CAD Comparison During the development of the X-38 some computer simulations are used to allow an optimization of the design. Therefore it is very important that the form of the actual vehicle matches the form of the CAD construction. For this reason the actual vehicle has to be digitized with high accuracy and high data density. In this application note, we show how the digitizing was done with ATOS and TRITOP CMM and how the data was treated to match the needs of NASA. GOM mbH Mittelweg 7-8 38106 Braunschweig Germany Phone +49 531 390 29 0 Fax +49 531 390 29 15 [email protected] GOM Branch Benelux Interleuvenlaan 15 E 3001 Leuven Belgium Phone +32 16 408 034 Fax +32 16 408 734 [email protected] GOM International AG Bremgarterstrasse 89B 8967 Widen Switzerland Phone +41 5 66 31 04 04 Fax +41 5 66 31 04 07 [email protected] GOM France SAS 10 Quai de la Borde - Bât A2 91130 Ris Orangis France Phone +33 1 60 47 90 50 Fax +33 1 69 06 63 60 [email protected] GOM UK Ltd Business Innovation Centre Coventry, CV3 2TX Great Britain Phone +44 2476 430 230 Fax +44 2476 430 001 [email protected] www.gom.com

Upload: others

Post on 06-Feb-2022

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Copyright © 2008 GOM mbH All rights reserved! Rev. A (en) 05052008 www.gom.com 1

Application Example: Quality Control

Aerospace: 3D Digitizing of the X-38 Space Vehicle

Measuring Systems: ATOS, TRITOPCMM

Keywords: Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD), CAD Comparison During the development of the X-38 some computer simulations are used to allow an optimization of the design. Therefore it is very important that the form of the actual vehicle matches the form of the CAD construction. For this reason the actual vehicle has to be digitized with high accuracy and high data density. In this application note, we show how the digitizing was done with ATOS and TRITOPCMM and how the data was treated to match the needs of NASA.

GOM mbHMittelweg 7-838106 BraunschweigGermanyPhone +49 531 390 29 0Fax +49 531 390 29 [email protected]

GOM Branch BeneluxInterleuvenlaan 15 E3001 LeuvenBelgiumPhone +32 16 408 034Fax +32 16 408 [email protected]

GOM International AGBremgarterstrasse 89B8967 WidenSwitzerlandPhone +41 5 66 31 04 04Fax +41 5 66 31 04 [email protected]

GOM France SAS10 Quai de la Borde - Bât A291130 Ris OrangisFrancePhone +33 1 60 47 90 50Fax +33 1 69 06 63 [email protected]

GOM UK LtdBusiness Innovation CentreCoventry, CV3 2TXGreat BritainPhone +44 2476 430 230Fax +44 2476 430 [email protected]

www.gom.com

Copyright © 2008 GOM mbH All rights reserved! Rev. A (en) 05052008 www.gom.com 2

Quality Control / Aerospace

3D Digitizing of the X-38 Space Vehicle

Fig. 1: Thermograph image taken from each part, directly after taking the part out of the blow molding tool. (front side / back side)

www.gom.com

Fig. 1: X-38 modell

Measuring Systems: ATOS, TRITOPCMM

Keywords: Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD), CAD Comparison

In the 90s, NASA started to develop the Autonom Crew Return Vehicle X-38. This vehicle is designed to bring up to seven astronauts in an emergency case safe back to earth.

For this development, flight and landing test were made from increasing dropping altitudes. From these experiments, the computer simulation can be confirmed and refined to allow an optimization of the design. Very important for this process is that the form of the actual model matches the form of the object used in the simulation (CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics). For this reason, the actual model has to be digitized with high accuracy and high data density during the development. From these actual data, CAD data is generated, which is used in the simulation.In this application note, we show how the digitizing was done and how the data was treated to match the needs of NASA. The project was conducted by Capture 3D as a service work for NASA.Digitizing was needed for the actual X-38 test vehicle, a 80% model, approx. 33 feet long, 12 feet tall and 10 feet wide. Based on these data, multiple evaluation tasks have to be started, e.g. "As Built Vs. As Designed", generate an "As Built" surface model for CFD Analysis and determine the effects of a previously "hard landing".

Copyright © 2008 GOM mbH All rights reserved! Rev. A (en) 05052008 www.gom.com 3

www.gom.com

Fig. 2: Measuring set up

Why did NASA select TRITOPCMM and ATOS over other systems• The vehicle is a working prototype which has to be digitized as it is.• The part is too big for existing CMMs and this process is too time consuming• Previously work was done with a Laser Tracker, giving accurate, but not

dense data. Now NASA wanted to ensure a full vehicle definition with ample data density on the big surfaces as well as in critical areas

• Data is needed which can support rapid surfacing from polygon mesh. ATOS ensures direct polygonal mesh data output in different data densities, for efficient, quick and detailed CAD generation

Special conditions for this measurementThe model has to be scanned in a working vehicle bay, during standard work at the vehicle by the HVAC retro fit crew. No special treatment of the object is allowed and a full surface digitizing with high data accuracy and high data density is needed. Bay doors are opening and closing and ambient lighting changes will happen in addition to the object movements. Furthermore, the underside of the vehicle has only three feet clearance from the floor.

These conditions ask for a scanning system which registers the ambient condi-tions, is insensitive for these influences and keep the user informed if the conditions influence the data integrity. In addition the scanning system has to be able to work with big areas, with the ability to be set up to a smaller measu-ring are with short standoff distance do to the restricted space under the object, to allow an efficient data acquisition.

Copyright © 2008 GOM mbH All rights reserved! Rev. A (en) 05052008 www.gom.com 4

www.gom.com

Fig. 3: Preparation

MeasurementTo start the measurement, coded and non-coded markers and two scale bars are applied onto the model. In addition some adapter targets are placed in reference bores of the model to define the coordinate system. Then the digital images are captured which allow TRITOPCMM to define the exact coordinates of all markers based on the photogrammetric principle. From this TRITOPCMM measurement, the reference file for the detailed digitizing is derived.

Fig. 4: TRITOPCMM measurement Fig. 5: TRITOPCMM marker position

Copyright © 2008 GOM mbH All rights reserved! Rev. A (en) 05052008 www.gom.com 5

www.gom.com

Fig. 6: Scan of the inner side of the wing

Fig. 7: Scan of the outer side

The digitizing of the upper and the side surfaces was made with the ATOS set to a measuring volume of 800 x 640 x 640 mm.

For the scanning on the underside, the scanner had to be adjusted for a smaller measuring volume (360 x 280 x 280 mm) with a shorter stand off distance due to the limited space under the object. The adjustment, including the calibration of the system is finished in ten minutes. The captured ATOS data is automatically combined into one project. After the digitizing, the polygonized data is automatically calculated with the requested data density from the stored information saved during the digitizing. Then, customized data (sections, thinned polygonized data, feature lines) can be derived using the ATOS software and stored in different standard data formats.

The measurement, including the data calculation and the data post treatment in ATOS took four days.

Fig. 8: Polygonized data (detailed area / complete object)

Copyright © 2008 GOM mbH All rights reserved! Rev. A (en) 05052008 www.gom.com 6

www.gom.com

ResultsThe color plot showing the deviations from the actual model versus the CAD data was made in two hours. This plots show a very good fit of the actual form to the CAD data. Only the symmetry of the wings was slightly out of tolerance. In addition it could be shown that the "hard landing" had not caused damaged the form of the model.

Fig. 9: As Built Vs. As Designed, top view Fig. 10: As Built Vs. As Designed, rear view

For the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), a CAD model was derived in eight hours based on the thinned out data from ATOS. For detailed analysis, a fine CAD model was built based on the dense ATOS data in five days.

The project triggered a modification on the model and was regarded from all involved parties as very positive.Based on this service job, the data integrity and density, NASA decided to buy their own ATOS XL system, to be able to integrate digitizing into their process and be able to digitize in future also the complete and real X-38 CRV in house.

Fig. 11: Sections, with 300 mm distance, calculated in ATOS

Fig. 12: CAD model, made from the ATOS data

By courtesy of NASA Dryden Flight Research Centers