application information: type of application: capital
TRANSCRIPT
APPLICATION INFORMATION:
Type of Application: Capital
Location: Pasco County, FL
Urban Areas: Tampa Bay Metropolitan Area
Amount Requested: $20 Million
ES-1
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Executive Summary
Pasco County, Florida is ambitiously
embarking on a journey to become
“Florida’s Premier County”. Through the
principles of creating a thriving community,
enhancing quality of life, stimulating
economic growth, and improving
organization performance, the agency is
determined to take the community to the
next level. In order to accomplish this, Pasco County must offer the region a healthy environment for
mobility and connectivity.
Since 2006, the East Pasco County area has been experiencing a dramatic increase in population and
employment which has congested travel along the CR/SR 54 and SR 52 interchanges of Interstate 75 (I-
75). In order to address these conditions, Pasco County, is pursuing funding for the I-75 at Overpass Road
Interchange – a transportation improvement project that will improve mobility and create new
opportunities for economic development.
Pasco County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) have identified the I-75 and Overpass
Road Interchange Project as the number one priority project in Pasco County. Additionally, this project
has been endorsed by both the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA). An Interchange Justification Report (IJR) has been developed by the County
concurrently with a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study. The IJR has been approved by
FDOT and FHWA and the PD&E is expected to be approved in October 2017. The total project cost is
$62.1 million. The County has identified $42.1 million for the project, which is being committed as local
match. The region hopes to receive the remaining $20 million through the TIGER discretionary grant
program.
A Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) was conducted following TIGER guidelines to systematically compare the
benefits and costs associated with the proposed project. Results indicate that the project will yield 2.7
times benefits compared to costs over a 20-year period. The project is not only a good use of federal
dollars, but also a much needed investment for the mobility, connectivity and economic vitality of the
region.
I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange Benefits
Provide efficient and reliable
mobility.
Enhance sustainability through the quality
of bridges and roadways, reducing future
maintenance requirements.
Improve safety using latest
industry standards and best
practices.
Demonstrate innovative design by
implementation of FHWA’s “Every Day
Counts” principles.
Advance condition of existing
transportation infrastructure
and system.
Support increased economic
competitiveness by enabling easy access to
residential, commercial, industrial, and
employment activity uses.
i
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Table of Contents
SECTION I: Project Description .................................................................................................... 1
The Connected City ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1
Meeting Transportation Challenges ........................................................................................................................................ 2
SECTION II: Project Location ........................................................................................................ 3
SECTION III: Project Parties .......................................................................................................... 7
SECTION IV: Grant Funds, Sources, & Uses of All Project Funds .............................................. 8
Project Costs ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Funding Commitments ................................................................................................................................................................. 8
SECTION V: Selection Criteria .................................................................................................... 10
Primary Merit Criteria ................................................................................................................................................................. 10
Safety ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10
State of Good Repair .................................................................................................................................................................. 14
Economic Competitiveness ...................................................................................................................................................... 14
Environmental Sustainability .................................................................................................................................................... 15
Quality of Life ................................................................................................................................................................................. 15
Secondary Merit Criteria ............................................................................................................................................................ 16
Innovation ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Partnership ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Results of the Benefit-Cost Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 19
SECTION VI: Project Readiness .................................................................................................. 21
Technical Feasibility ..................................................................................................................................................................... 21
NEPA Approval .............................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Engineering ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Permitting ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
Additional Approvals .................................................................................................................................................................. 22
Financial Feasibility ...................................................................................................................................................................... 23
Ability of Pasco County to Fund the Project ..................................................................................................................... 23
Schedule ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 23
Federal Wage Rate Certification ................................................................................................ 24
Appendices................................................................................................................................... 25
ii
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
List of Tables
Table 1: Project Funding Plan ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 2: Project Cost ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 3: Benefit-Cost Analysis Results (in millions of 2016 dollars) ......................................................................... 19
Table 4: BCA Results by Long-Term Outcome (in millions of 2016 dollars, present value terms) ............... 20
Table 5: Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................................................... 23
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Figure 2: Existing Population & Employment Density ...................................................................................................... 5
Figure 3: Future Population & Employment Density ........................................................................................................ 6
Figure 4: Crash Density .............................................................................................................................................................. 11
Figure 5: Crash Type .................................................................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 6: Crash Severity .............................................................................................................................................................. 13
Figure 7: Map of Interchange, Connected Cities, and Industrial Park ..................................................................... 14
Figure 8: Pasco County Mobility 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Projects ......................................................................... 22
1
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
SECTION I: Project Description
The transition from a rural community into an urban activity center always prompts exciting opportunities.
Transportation infrastructure is critical to promoting sustainable development while avoiding congestion,
environmental constraints, and a deteriorated quality of life. Pasco County, Florida is currently presented
with this opportunity to transform from a “bedroom” community into a sustainable, Connected City, and
seamless access to flourishing market areas is critical.
This TIGER grant application seeks to support Pasco County’s progress by the development of an
interchange on I-75 at Overpass Road between SR 52 and CR/SR 54. The project would result in the
reconstruction of the existing Overpass Road overpass at I-75 into a full diamond interchange. This
includes dual westbound to southbound I-75 turn lanes and a single eastbound turn lane to northbound
I-75 left turn lane extending across a new Overpass Road bridge.
The site of this proposal would provide critical access to the thriving Wesley Chapel market, recognized as
one of the nation’s top 40 fastest growing communities. This area offers extensive commercial,
residential, education facilities and industrial development, encompassing approximately 2,000 acres of
prime employment center infrastructure. Additionally, this project will provide access to the City of
Zephyrhills which growing an activity hub near the airport. The area currently experiences extensive traffic
and the existing interchanges are expected to fail in the near future if the current trends continue. This
proposal seeks to address this situation and improve current and future travel and access conditions in
the area.
The Connected City In 2015, the Florida State Legislature established Pasco County as a pilot community for its Connected
City Comprehensive Plan Amendments. This measure allows the County to implement an ultra-fast
communications network to attract new technology industries and sustain modern urban design
infrastructure for the community. The I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange project has been part of an on-
going PD&E study that would improve
access to the area of Pasco County selected
for the pilot Connected City project.
Additionally, the Florida Department of
Economic Opportunity (DEO) has certified
Pasco County for a 10-year pilot program
facilitating high-tech industry growth and
innovation through partnerships supporting
research, marketing, workforce
development, and entrepreneurship.
The site of the I-75 and Overpass Road
project connects to 1.8 million square feet
of development for utilization as an
Industrial and Office Park, employing an estimated 4,000 residents. This is a Job Ready Site and is
intended to support LEED certified technology infrastructure that can meet the needs of an innovative and
eco-friendly market. These elements lay the foundation for a successful economic center for Pasco
County, but also trigger tremendous increase in traffic along the I-75 corridor and the interchanges in the
area.
Pasco County Connected City Benefits
Facilitation of hi-tech industry growth and
communications: Smart Gigabit Community
Innovative partnerships and job creation:
Florida Hospital & Wellness Community
Promotion of Alternative Transportation
Networks: On-Demand Autonomous Cars
2
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Meeting Transportation Challenges
Since 2006, the East Pasco County area has
experienced a dramatic increase in
population and employment. This growth
has influenced the travel demand along I-75,
which is a critically important facility for
FDOT and FHWA. I-75 is part of the National
Highway Network and National Highway
Freight Network. I-75 is also part of Florida’s
Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), a system
of high priority transportation assets critical
for statewide and interregional travel. It is
one of the primary corridors utilized by over
60 million annual visitors to Florida in
addition to statewide and local traffic.
Deteriorating conditions along this section of the roadway have continued to intensify due to growth
impacts, specifically within the Wesley Chapel area.
An Interchange Justification Report (IJR) was completed in 2013 and funded by Pasco County with review
support from FHWA, FDOT Central Office, and the FDOT District Seven Interchange Review Committee.
The IJR was approved in April 2014 and demonstrated that the addition of a new interchange at Overpass
Road reduces traffic volumes at each adjacent interchange by 13,000 vehicles per day. The adjacent
interchanges at SR 52 and CR/SR 54 are also heavily utilized, generating substantial congestion and
unsafe traveling conditions. The new Overpass Road Interchange provides an alternative and reduces the
overall traffic pressure on the existing, over-utilized infrastructure.
The project is also expected to improve traffic operations, enhance connectivity, and improve safety on I-
75 and in the immediate vicinity of I-75. As stated previously, the area is currently experiencing increased
activity and development is projected to continue as more attention is given to this Connected City area.
With this increase in attention comes increased traffic, congestion, travel times, air pollution, and
increased safety challenges. These challenges are coupled with the current conditions already experienced
by the popularity of I-75 use from visitors, freight carriers, and nearly 90,000 residents commuting
through the region.
The project has made significant headway in terms of readying essential project components for
implementation. For example, as part of the PD&E study for this interchange, Pasco County submitted an
Environmental Assessment Finding of the No Significant Impact (EA FONSI) which is currently under
review by the FDOT Office of Environmental Management. The County anticipates receiving approval with
a Location and Design Concept Acceptance (LDCA) by the end of October 2017. Additionally, all required
permits have been identified and the land is set to be publically owned before construction.
The I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange is anticipated to play a significant role in the regional
transportation network by enhancing connectivity, safety, and traffic circulation. This project will divert
traffic from future over-capacity interchanges and also assist with emergency evacuation. The
improvements ensure mobility is maintained on Florida’s Interstate Highway System and accessibility to
existing and proposed developments is enhanced along the connected corridor.
Wesley Chapel Traffic at SR 56
3
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
SECTION II: Project Location
The I-75 at Overpass Road project
is located within Pasco County,
Florida, home to approximately
500,000 residents. The County is
located adjacent to the Gulf of
Mexico and encompasses
approximately 868 square miles,
with land consisting of 86
percent. The County is part of the
Tampa-St. Pete-Clearwater
Metropolitan Statistical Area
(MSA), which is the second
largest MSA in the Southeast and
the 21st largest in the country. Lands within the project area include Connected Cities and a 100 acre
County-owned parcel currently being developed for a Class A Office and Industrial Park. The project area
is also designated as an Urban Service Expansion Area, in accordance with The Comprehensive Plan of
Unincorporated Pasco County. The long-term vision, as reflected in this plan, includes a significant
increase in residential, commercial, industrial, and employment land uses.
The proposed project is located approximately 3.5 miles south of the I-75 at SR 52 interchange. Figure 1
shows the project location. The Overpass Road Interchange is anticipated to play a significant role in the
regional network in terms of enhancing connectivity and traffic circulation, as the I-75 corridor serves as
part of Florida’s designated SIS network and connects major residential and employment centers
throughout the state. I-75 also serves traffic from the Port of Tampa, Port Everglades, the CSX Winter
Haven Intermodal Logistics Center and the Port of Miami. This new interchange will reduce traffic
congestion on the east-west arterials of SR 52 and CR/SR 54 by providing this essential connection with I-
75. Additionally, Overpass Road runs parallel or connects to four primary state evacuation routes (SR 52,
CR/SR 54, I-75, and US 301).
Located south of the project is Wesley Chapel – a census-designated place (CDP) in the County. This area
has become a major catalyst for growth in Pasco County since 2000. Due to the development in the
Wesley Chapel area, traffic volumes and congestion on I-75 with SR 56, CR/SR 54, and SR 52 as well as
Overpass Road increased over time. Figures 2 and 3 display the existing and future (2040) population and
employment densities.
Pasco County Connected City
7
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
SECTION III: Project Parties
Pasco County is governed by five elected
Commissioners and an appointed County
Administrator, who has executive powers to
implement policies and procedures set forth
by the Board of County Commissioners. The
County government oversees a billion dollar
budget, 2,000 employees and more than
60 departments and divisions. The
Planning and Development Department
assists with guiding the County’s current and
future growth and is supported by an award-
wining team to ensure projects are strategically planned and efficiently implemented.
Pasco County Government considers the construction of the I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange a top
priority and is committed to providing all local funding to match the TIGER award. While there are no
other local funding partners for this project, there are strong non-funding partners which will assist with
promotion and advocacy. Letters of support from these entities can be found online in Appendix C. FHWA
and FDOT have participated in the review and approval process for project components including the IJR
and the PD&E.
If selected, Pasco County is prepared to work closely with the USDOT TIGER team to ensure the
administration of the grant funds is conducted with quality and optimum efficiency. The Pasco County
grant team will adhere to all TIGER management parameters and deadlines as well as incorporate the
project administration elements described in the graphic below.
Project Administration Elements
Clearly stated objectives and goals
for a successful project.
Detailed schedule with milestone dates
and the critical path elements defined.
Clear, concise definition of the scope
of services with responsible
individuals identified.
Communication path outlining protocol
for correspondence, e-mails, phone calls,
meetings filing, etc.
Organizational structure with
contact information for key
personnel.
Project specific quality control plan with
clear expectations for staff and consultants.
Pasco County Government
8
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
SECTION IV: Grant Funds, Sources, & Uses of All Project Funds
The County is seeking a TIGER grant so that the design and construction of the I-75 at Overpass Road
Interchange can be accomplished on an expedited schedule as a design/build project. A design/build
approach will also help lower the overall construction cost of the project, increasing the benefit of the
dollars used towards it.
Project Costs The total capital costs are estimated at approximately $61.2 million in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars.
These costs include construction; right-of-way (ROW); Preliminary Engineering (PE); and Construction,
Engineering, and Inspection (CEI). The construction amounts include costs associated with maintenance of
traffic (MOT), mobilization, and contingencies. A detailed breakdown of the estimate can be found in the
IJR online in Appendix E. Table 2 details the cost of the project by phase (also refer to SF 424C in
Appendix A).
The costs for the required ROW were estimated for the proposed interchange configuration. These costs
were estimated using unit costs established based on potential future land uses for the impacted parcels
and were coordinated with the Pasco County Property Appraiser’s Office.
Funding Commitments Pasco County will be leveraging the local dollars from the municipal capacity in order to facilitate project
implementation and has been seeking additional grant funding to commit the entire cost upfront. The I-
75 and Overpass Road Interchange project will be supported by multiple local funding sources of revenue.
These sources include the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax (Penny for Pasco), Villages of Pasadena
Hills (VOPH) Tax Increment Revenue Bond, Interstate/SIS Mobility Fees collected in the East Mobility Fee
Collection/Benefit District, VOPH Tax Increment Revenues, VOPH External Improvement Fees, and other
County funding sources. A summary of this anticipated revenue is listed in Table 1.
32%
68%
Project Funding Sources
Federal (TIGER) Local (Pasco)
9
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Table 1: Project Funding Plan
Funding for the I-75 and Overpass Road Interchange design/permitting, ROW acquisition and
construction has been programmed each fiscal year since FY 13/14 in the Pasco County Transportation
Capital Plan. Historically and continuing today, 100 percent of local resources are being programmed
and committed to this project.
Table 2: Project Cost
STANDARD COST CATEGORY (SCC)
CODE
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
(YOE DOLLARS) PERCENTAGE OF PROJECT COST
Design/
Permitting $4.6M 7%
ROW $12.2M 20%
Construction $45.3M 73%
Total $62.1M 100%
FUNDING SOURCE AMOUNT
2015 Penny for Pasco $15,000,000
VOPH Tax Increment Revenue Bond $12,720,335
East Pasco SIS Mobility Fees $5,080,023
VOPH Tax Increment Revenues $2,665,895
VOPH External Improvement Fees $1,638,830
Other County Funds $4,994,917
TIGER $20,000,000
Total $62,100,000
10
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
SECTION V: Selection Criteria
As mentioned previously, I-75 is a freeway designated on the SIS network, providing regional connectivity
throughout the State of Florida, as well as access to the business districts of Hillsborough County and
Pinellas County via I-275. An estimated 1.7 million trips per weekday have destinations within Pasco
County and I-75 is an integral part of the network that enables these trips. The future growth of the area
will increase the amount of trips along this corridor creating congestion and negative environmental and
quality of life impacts. The proposed project seeks to address this situation and divert trips from the
CR/SR 54 and SR 52 interchanges with I-75 while facilitating connectivity within Pasco County and the
Tampa Bay region.
Primary Merit Criteria
Safety The I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange
will promote improved traffic safety by
reducing congestion related accidents. A
safe transportation infrastructure is
needed for this growing area and this is
exactly the support this project offers.
The IJR analyzed safety impacts to the
proposed interchange. Measures from
the report demonstrate that the
interchange improves the condition of
the facility associated with heavy
westbound to southbound traffic. This is
accomplished by a grade separation for the movement which would otherwise require left turn
movements.
The vehicular delays and queue lengths at the adjacent interchanges of CR/SR 54 and SR 52 are shown to
significantly decrease. In the PM peak hour direction of travel for Design Year (2040), the queue back up
at CR/SR 54 northbound ramp reduces by 48 percent. During the same period, the queue back up at SR
52 northbound reduces by 35 percent. The additional detour route options from these interchanges also
enhance incident management capabilities and offers additional emergency management evacuation
routes.
In general, the I-75 corridor crash statistics are lower than that of the statewide average for the same
facility type, but when it comes to the adjacent interchange connected side roads, the statistics are
much greater. For the SR 54 interchange with I-75, the crash rate was 1.211 per million entering vehicles
(MEV) compared to the state average of 0.576 MEV. Figures 4 through 6 display crash data
summarized throughout the project corridor collected from 2012 to 2016.
The project is estimated to save $63.3 million in accident costs during a 20-year operational period (refer
to the Benefit-Cost Analysis documentation in Appendix B.)
Pasco County I-75 Car Accident
14
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Additionally, the latest FDOT standards and best practices will be integrated into the design and
construction of this interchange. The County will work hand-in-hand with partners at USDOT and FDOT
to ensure the safest possible interchange both during construction and upon completion. Special
attention will also be afforded to two key parties of concern during construction, which will be the
construction team and the drivers passing through the work zone.
State of Good Repair The project is consistent with regional initiatives for management and operations of the transportation
network. The project is appropriately capitalized and would be maintained through sustainable and
ongoing maintenance funds programmed at the County level. The project is identified in the MPO’s
Mobility 2040 LRTP, as well as the County’s list of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) with funding already
supporting the IJR and the PD&E Study for Overpass Road.
Approved and planned developments in the area have been integrated into the travel demand forecasting
for the IJR. The proposed interchange has previously been shown as needed improvement as part of the
Pasadena Hills Area Plan and other Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and Master Planned Unit
Development (MPUD) projects. The interchange is expected to improve access to these land uses and the
Wesley Chapel area of Pasco County. It is also consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan.
Support from these activities and further coordination with other priority projects will also help with future
sustainability of the system.
This project will improve the condition of the existing transportation facilities and systems by relieving
congestion at the adjacent Interchanges by 13,000 vehicles per day. This will lead to improved safety and
enhanced system resiliency. If left unimproved, the adjacent Interchanges would degrade future mobility
in the area, constrain access to a key market and activity center, and reduce the efficiency of the
transportation network.
Economic Competitiveness This project will provide enhanced access for the
region’s visitors as well as workforce to the
growing job centers in the East Pasco County area.
Additionally, following the economic recession,
Pasco County rescinded transportation
concurrency County-wide. The long-term effects of
this decision will result in a significant increase of
residential, commercial, industrial and employment
land uses, which this new interchange will support.
The result of the project completion in a timely,
innovative and cost-efficient manner will enable
economic development to be advanced on at least
two sites in the vicinity of the new interchange.
Development of these two sites will be game
changers in the Tampa Bay region as they focus on
Connected City strategies. If nothing is done, over
the next five years, employment in Pasco County is projected to expand by 8,368 jobs. Aggressive
measures are needed in order to increase this number by at least 50 percent and come closer to the
County’s goals to diversify the economy.
Figure 7: Map of Interchange, Connected Cities, and
Industrial Park
15
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Preliminary IMPLAN Economic Modeling has
estimated that at full build-out of both Connected
Cities and the Pasco Industrial Park, a total of 28,231
new direct and indirect jobs will be created,
contributing $954,000,000 in annual payroll, and
contributing nearly $1.4 billion in annual gross
County domestic product.
Environmental Sustainability Pasco County is very proud of the pristine
environment and will continue to mitigate unnecessary
impacts throughout the life of this project. While this
interchange project is required to meet transportation
needs and serve new and attractive communities, the
County will ensure that the asphalt footprint is
minimized and environmental and wildlife protection
is maximized.
The IJR concluded that a diamond interchange would
produce one of the lowest environmental impacts in
the area. Furthermore, the project is on a designated
hurricane evacuation route and will be designed to be
resilient against natural disasters. The proposed
project would also contribute to environmental
sustainability through reductions in air pollution and
CO2 emissions.
Also, the improved quality of the bridges and roadway
will minimize future maintenance needs.
Quality of Life Quality of life will be improved with the construction of
this project with resulting benefits being improved
connectivity and mobility. The I-75 at Overpass Road
Interchange will provide efficient and reliable mobility
to this fast growing segment of Pasco County. It will
provide the level of service demanded by the new
and cutting edge communities they will serve such as
Connected Cities. A high level of service will include
minimal travel delay and congestion and reduced
commute time.
Without improvements to this corridor, there will be a
severe threat to the continued viability of the economy
and the quality of life. User travel times will continue
to increase, the movement of goods through the urban area will be slower, and the deliveries of goods
within the urban area will be adversely impacted.
Wesley Chapel Photos
16
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Secondary Merit Criteria
Innovation Innovation is infused throughout the
development, administration, and
partnership of the I-75 at Overpass
Road Interchange project. Beginning
with the design/build approach, the
County is seeking to incorporate swift,
quality measures for optimizing
efficiency and resources. The design
team of this project will integrate
techniques such as
precast/prefabricated bridge elements
and systems as an economical way for
enhancing quality, reducing costs, and
advancing the construction timeline.
This rapid construction approach will
minimize the impact to the travelling
public on I-75 and Overpass Road.
Investigating the use of prefabricated
elements versus conventional
construction helps determine the
best balance between direct and
indirect costs while delivering the
project in a timely manner with
minimal public impact.
Innovative processes such as FHWA’s
new initiative, “Every Day Counts”, will
guide the team to accelerate project
delivery. The County is receptive to any innovative options/ideas as we partner with USDOT to deliver a
quality project in a safe and timely fashion.
It should be reiterated as well that the I-75 and Overpass Road Interchange project is an integral part of
the transportation infrastructure needed for the thriving and innovative commercial and residential
community that is known as the Connected City. As highlighted in the beginning of this report, the
Connected City is an anchor to high tech industries and cutting edge communications. The I-75 at
Overpass Road Interchange will be the first impression connecting these innovative communities with the
rest of the region. The expectations are significant for integrating this interchange into these
developments and will require innovative accountability and performance measures. Pasco County is
prepared for this by utilizing SMART goals.
Pasco County Connected City Rendering
17
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
SMART GOALS
In addition to meeting County values of integrity, respect, honesty and innovation, the project team will
endeavor to achieve the following SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and timely)
goals.
I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange SMART Goals
Asphalt Quality - Perform field visits on the project to minimize surface and quality
deficiencies.
Asphalt Documentation - The Resident Asphalt Specialist shall review quality control and
verification technicians asphalt documentation for accuracy and specification compliance,
compile the lot packages and assist Project Administrators with determining Asphalt related
pay quantities and adjustments.
Change Orders - Change orders prepared for assigned contracts will be in compliance with
County requirements.
CEI Accountability - Perform quarterly CEI performance grades with written, meaningful
comments. Perform periodic quality assurance activities to ensure CEI is performing services
in accordance with the contract and adhering to the CEI established QC plan.
Daily Work Reports - Prepare legible, accurate Daily Work Reports that cover all pertinent
field activities and conditions.
Final Acceptance - All required processes and documents will be completed and received prior
to issuance of final acceptance. Final Estimates documentation will be submitted within fifteen
(15) days for streamline contracts and thirty (30) days for non-streamline contracts from final
acceptance.
Final Estimates - Completeness, timeliness, and procedural accuracy of Final Estimates
documentation will be ensured.
QC Reviews - Quality Control Progress Field Reviews will be performed and feedback
provided to project staff to ensure uniformity and best practices are followed.
Time Money - Monitoring of time and cost performance will be required and time and cost
issues will be proactively addressed in order to ensure avoidable cost or time overruns.
Safety - Promote safety practices to ensure employee proficiency with concepts from Job
Hazard Analysis (JHA) Contractors Maintenance of Traffic (MOT), Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE). Comply with reporting, accountability, training, and improvement safety
measures.
18
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Partnership Strong collaboration will be essential during the development of the I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange.
The project is endorsed by both the FDOT and the FHWA and each agency has been intimately involved in
the review and approval of the IJR and the PD&E. The project team will continue to seek guidance from
these collaborators and involve them during the critical design and construction timelines of this project.
Pasco County has a robust plan for providing sustainable, local funding for this project and therefore has
only sought support from additional partners in terms of advocacy and coordination. These non-funding
partners include FDOT, Pasco County MPO, School Board, City of Zephyrhills, elected officials, private
entities and interested parties.
Innovative partnerships outside of the public resource community will also be secured for the
development of this interchange. The project has the potential to benefit the overall activity center, and
therefore, Pasco County will garner support from the private and business communities. One example is
the Wildcat Groves Master Planned Unit Development, which already includes donation of the ROW at I-
75 for this project.
I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange Partners
Florida Department of
Transportation
Pasco County School Board
Pasco County Commissioners
& Metropolitan Planning
Organization
City of Zephyrhills
Senator Bill Nelson
Congressmen
Gus M. Bilirakis &
Daniel Webster
Sonny’s Appliances
Wildcat Groves Master
Planed Unit Development
Metro Development Group
Crown Community
Development
Freemarr Development, Inc. Suntech Investments, Inc. Elizabeth Rodriguez &
Associates
Adrian Phillip Overpass, LLC Massey Partners LTD. Dairy Farm Corporation
19
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Results of the Benefit-Cost Analysis All monetary values are expressed in 2016 dollars and discounted to year 2017. The period of analysis
used to estimate benefits and costs related to the differences between the Build (with the proposed
interchange) and the No-Build (without the interchange) runs from 2018 to 2041, including four year of
construction (2018-2021) and 20 years of operations (2022 through 2041). The analysis also assumes that
the growth rates in the regional travel demand, in terms of vehicle hours traveled (VHT) and vehicle miles
traveled (VMT), projected between the opening year and 2040 (the horizon year used in the regional
travel demand model) would continue through 2041. Table 3 summarizes the results of the benefit-cost
analysis.
Table 3: Benefit-Cost Analysis Results (in millions of 2016 dollars)
BENEFIT AND COST METRICS 2018-2041 TOTALS
DISCOUNTED AT 7% BEFORE DISCOUNTING
PROJECT BENEFITS
Travel Time Savings $89.2 $256.4
Vehicle Operating Cost Savings $23.5 $66.8
Emission Savings (Carbon) $0.6 $1.6
Emission Savings (non-Carbon) $1.0 $2.1
Safety $22.4 $63.6
Residual Value $5.8 $29.3
Total Benefits $142.4 $419.9
PROJECT COSTS
Capital $52.3 $62.1
O&M Costs $0.8 $2.0
Total Project Costs $53.1 $64.1
Total Benefits less Total Costs (NPV) $89.3 NA
Benefit-Cost Ratio 2.71 NA
Internal Rate of Return 17.3% NA
Breakeven Year 2029 NA
* The Benefit-Cost Ratio was calculated as: (Benefits – O&M Costs) / Capital Costs, in compliance with the
latest BCA Guidance for TIGER
As shown in Table 3, with a 7 percent real discount rate, the total monetizable benefits of the proposed
interchange project are projected at $142.4 million (in present discounted value terms) while the total
costs of the project (including capital expenses and incremental operating and maintenance costs) are
forecast at $53.1 million. This would result in a benefit-cost ratio of 2.71, and a net present value (NPV) of
$89.3 million. The corresponding internal rate of return (IRR) of the project is projected at 17.3 percent,
while the breakeven year would be in 2029.
A sensitivity analysis with respect to the discount rate was also conducted. With a 3 percent real discount
rate, the project’s benefit-cost ratio increases to 4.44, the NPV rises to $198.0 million, while the breakeven
year moves to 2028.
20
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Table 4 below presents the breakdown of total benefits by category, using the five long-term outcome
criteria set forth by USDOT: State of Good Repair, Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life,
Environmental Sustainability, and Safety.
Table 4: BCA Results by Long-Term Outcome (in millions of 2016 dollars, present value terms)
LONG-TERM OUTCOMES BENEFIT CATEGORY RESULTS (7% DISCOUNT RATE)
State of Good Repair Residual value of capital investment $5.8
Economic Competitiveness
Travel time savings to roadway users $89.2
Vehicle operating cost savings to
roadways users $23.5
Jobs creation Qualitative
Improved land access Qualitative
Quality of Life Improved jobs access Qualitative
Environmental Sustainability Emission cost savings $1.6
Safety Accident cost savings $22.4
Total Project Benefits $142.4
User benefits for travelers in the region (travel time savings and vehicle operating cost savings) account
for a large majority of the total monetizable benefits of the project, and are included in the economic
competitiveness category. Safety benefits can be expected to be second largest broad category of
benefits generated by this project, followed by residual value (state of good repair), and environmental
sustainability. Although not quantified in this application, the project is also expected to result in job
creation and improved access to developable land, as well as job opportunities, leading to improved
quality of life.
Details pertaining to the methodology, assumptions, and additional results pertaining to the BCA of this
project are presented in Appendix B.
21
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
SECTION VI: Project Readiness
The I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange will enable USDOT to obligate TIGER funds as required. The
following subsections discuss the project’s readiness to move forward with implementation. Pasco County
is committed to implementing this important regional project in order to proactively address current and
future traffic conditions along I-75. This project is an opportunity to utilize innovative transportation
planning methods to avoid reactionary responses and band aid measures for future congested conditions.
Technical Feasibility Several major technical milestones have already been completed to ensure project readiness.
NEPA Approval During the PD&E study for the proposed I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange, Pasco County submitted an
EA FONSI which is currently under review by FDOT Office of Environmental Management (OEM). The
County anticipates approval/LDCA by the end of October 2017.
Engineering An IJR is required if a roadway project proposes a new interchange on a limited access facility, or highway,
such as I-75. The processes to be utilized for an IJR are defined by FDOT and the purpose of the review is
to demonstrate the need for the project as well as its viability based on traffic, engineering, financial, and
other criteria. Additionally, FHWA regulates the addition of access points, or interchanges, along the
Interstate System. To be compliant, a project must meet the following requirements:
The existing system, even with reasonable improvements, cannot satisfactorily accommodate the
projected design year traffic demands;
All reasonable alternatives to a new interchange must be considered, including ramp metering,
mass transit, and HOV facilities;
The proposed interchange does not have a significant adverse impact on the operations and
safety of the interstate or on the local street network based on both the current and future traffic
projections;
The proposed project provides a full interchange with all traffic movements connecting to a
public road;
The proposed project considered and is consistent with local and regional land use and
transportation plans;
The proposed project is consistent with long-range systems or network plans;
The proposed project is coordinated with the area's development; and
The proposed interchange will be included as an alternative in the required environmental
evaluation, review and processing.
The IJR was approved by FHWA and FDOT, which indicates that the project is acceptable for engineering
and operations.
Permitting To implement this project the following permits have been identified:
US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Dredge and Fill Permit
Southwest Florida Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit
22
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Pasco County ROW Use Permit
Florida Department of Transportation ROW Use Permit
All required permits will be secured during the design phase of the project. The timeline for securing all of
the permits is incorporated into the design phase of the project. Any local permits required will be
prioritized and expedited.
Additional Approvals
Previous planning leading up to the development of this project began in 2003 when Pasco County
initiated the Overpass Road Route Study to evaluate capacity and safety improvement alternatives for
Overpass Road and connecting roads. The recommendations were to support a locally preferred
alternative and this was approved by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners on April 26, 2005.
Following this, Pasco County completed an Interchange Feasibility Study in 2006 and influencing these
efforts, FDOT and FHWA approved the interchange as an acceptable opportunity for I-75 and Overpass
Road with the completion of an Interchange Justification Report.
The project has already received approval from regional transportation planning agencies. Pasco County
and the MPO have also identified the I-75 and Overpass Road Interchange project as the number one
priority project in Pasco County in the 2017 List of Priority Projects, approved on July 13, 2017. The project
is also included in the MPO Mobility 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan (refer to Figure 8).
Figure 8: Pasco County Mobility 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Projects
Figure 8: Pasco County Mobility
2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Projects
23
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Financial Feasibility The total capital costs are estimated to be $62.1 million for the construction of the project which will take
approximately 48 months. The financial plan calls for 32 percent TIGER funding support, with the
remaining portion being funded locally by Pasco County.
Ability of Pasco County to Fund the Project Pasco County’s fiscal, managerial, environmental, real estate, and engineering personnel have the
experience and expertise to provide strong project management and implementation of TIGER funded
projects. Despite significant reductions in capital projects over the past several years of economic
downturns, Pasco County manages a healthy budget annually devoted to transportation capital projects
and has several capital projects in progress during Fiscal Year 2017-2018.
If approved, the I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange will be implemented through a design/build contract
to assure accountability and serve as a single point of contact on the project performance. In addition,
USDOT’s guidance in the project ensures an additional level of project expertise and oversight.
Schedule Should a TIGER grant be awarded to this project, the I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange will follow a
schedule comprised of four major tasks with construction beginning in Spring 2019 and 100 percent
completion by Fall 2021. Following the award notification, the four major tasks include initiating the
administration plan, dispersing the TIGER grant funds, procuring design/build consultants, and
constructing the project. Table 5 shows the schedule activities for the program.
Table 5: Project Schedule
Project Activity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Completion of NEPA
Design/Build Procurement
Design Starts
TIGER Grant Funds Obligated
Construction Starts
Project Open
Assessment of Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
The following project risks and mitigation strategies were identified for this program:
Pre-Construction Delays (ROW acquisition, project design, necessary environmental reviews and
other approvals): The Pasco County has taken necessary steps to ensure there will be no risk for
failing to obligate TIGER funds. All project tasks including PD&E, design and ROW acquisition will
24
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
be completed prior to construction. Once construction funds become available, design/build
method will be used for this program to expedite project delivery.
Construction Delays: The design/build construction method is optimal in order to mitigate
construction delays before they occur.
Grant Administration/Project Management: Implementing the Grant Administration plan will
clearly outline Pasco County’s project management approach, and non-funding partner roles in
outreach and coordination. Establishing these roles and responsibilities upfront avoids any
potential issues, ensuring that the funds can be committed and the project can be delivered as
anticipated.
Federal Wage Rate Certification
Please refer to the online Appendix A for a copy of the Federal Wage Rate Certificate.
Pasco County In Action
25
I-75 @ Overpass Road Interchange
Appendices
The following appendices are available online at: http://fl-pascocounty.civicplus.com/index.aspx?NID=2850
Appendix A
SF 424
SF 424C
Federal Wage Rate Certificate
Appendix B
Benefit-Cost Analysis Technical Appendix
Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet Model
Appendix C
Project Support Letters
Appendix D
List of Regional Priority Projects
Appendix E
Approved IJR
IJR Appendices
PD&E
Air Quality Technical Memorandum
Conceptual State Relocation Plan
Contamination Screening Evaluation Report
Cultural Resource Awareness Survey Report
Environmental Assessment
Location Hydraulic Report
Noise Study Report
Pond Siting Report
Preliminary Engineering Report
Wetland Evaluation and Biological Assessment Report
Traffic Noise Model Files
Deborah Bolduc, AICP
Program Administrator Engineering Services Administration 8731 Citizens Dr., Suite 320 New Port Richey, FL 34654 [email protected] Ph: (727) 847-8140, ext. 8756
Kevin Sumner
Sr. Project Manager Project Management Sunset Building 5418 Sunset Road New Port Richey, FL 34654 [email protected] Ph: (727) 834-3604, ext. 1621