application layers

27
1 Application Layer Presentation Layer Session Layer Transport Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Application Layer Presentation Layer Session Layer Transport Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Network Layer Electrical and/or Optical Signals Application A Application B Data Link Layer Physical Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Communication Network Figure 2.6 Review of seven layers

Upload: mahesh-attri

Post on 30-Oct-2014

946 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: application layers

1

ApplicationLayer

PresentationLayer

SessionLayer

TransportLayer

NetworkLayer

Data LinkLayer

PhysicalLayer

ApplicationLayer

PresentationLayer

SessionLayer

TransportLayer

NetworkLayer

Data LinkLayer

PhysicalLayer

NetworkLayer

Electrical and/or Optical Signals

Application A Application B

Data LinkLayer

PhysicalLayer

NetworkLayer

Data LinkLayer

PhysicalLayer

Communication Network

Figure 2.6

Review of seven layers

Page 2: application layers

Data Link Control

• Framing• Line Discipline/MAC• Flow Control• Error Control• Addressing

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Page 3: application layers

Data Link Layer

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Page 4: application layers

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Page 5: application layers

Peer-to-peer protocols

• Two communicating entities are called peer processes.

• Communication between layer n+1 peers is virtual and is carried by layer n service

• Two meanings of peer-to-peer: point-to-point (hop-by-hop): end-to-end (user-to-user):

Physical link

network

Page 6: application layers

6

3 2 11 22 1

3 2 11 22 1

21

Medium

12

Physical layer entity

Data link layer entity

3 Network layer entity

PhysicalLayer

Data linkLayer

PhysicalLayer

Data linkLayer

A B

A B

Packets Packets

Frames

(a)

(b)

Peer-to-peer protocol across a single hop

1. take packets2. form frame3. transfer through

Physical layer

5. deliver tonetwork layer

Several pairs of data link & physical entities

Only one network layer entity, a routermay connect several different networks

4. Pass up

Page 7: application layers

PhysicalLayer

Data linkLayer

PhysicalLayer

Data linkLayer

End system

NetworkLayer

NetworkLayer

PhysicalLayer

Data linkLayer

NetworkLayer

PhysicalLayer

Data linkLayer

NetworkLayer

TransportLayer

TransportLayer

Messages Messages

Segments

End system

Network

Peer-to-peer protocol operating end-to-end across network

Page 8: application layers

3 2 11 22 1

3 2 11 22 1

21

Medium

A B

3 2 11 221

C

2 1

21

2 134 1 2 3 4

End System End System

Network1

2

Physical layer entity

Data link layer entity 3 Network layer entity

3 Network layer entity

Transport layer entity4Figure 5.4Peer-to-peer protocol operating end-to-end across network

1. Layer 4 not in middle 2.Data go up and down in router

3. Different paths4. Out of order, delay, duplicate, lost

Page 9: application layers

9

Service models

• Connection-oriented and connectionless• Confirmed and unconfirmed• A service may transfer in constant bit rate ( CBR)

or variant bit rate (VBR)

Page 10: application layers

1 2 3 4 5

Data Data Data

ACK/NAK

Data

1 2 3 4 5Data Data Data Data

ACK/NAK

ACK/NAK

ACK/NAK

ACK/NAK

End-to-end

Hop-by-hop

Figure 5.7

Adaptation functions may be implemented end-to-end or hop-by-hop

Data are ACK or NAK by the other end

Data are ACK or NAK by each hop

Page 11: application layers

11

End-to-end versus hop-by-hop (cont.)•Hop-by-hop: faster recovery & more reliable but more burden on middle nodes•End-to-end: simpler and only at end-system•QUESTIONS:

–could hop-to-hop waivers end-to-end? NO. it is difficult for all elements in the hop-by-hop chain to operate correctly, furthermore the errors may be introduced in middle nodes--Adaptations are implemented at which layer(s)?

Hop-by-hop: End-by-End:

Data link & network layerTransport & application layer

Page 12: application layers

12

End-to-end versus hop-by-hop (cont.)

• In case of error-detection and recovery:– If frequent errors, use hop-by-hop , otherwise end-to-end

• Flow control and congestion control could be exercised on a hop-by-hop or end-to-end basis or both.

• Security issue: may be hop-by-hop or end-by-end– IPSec (IP security protocol) in Internet layer, hop-by-hop/end-to-end?

– SSL (Secure Socket Layer) in transport layer, end-to-end– SSH (Secure Shell) in application layer, end-to-end

Page 13: application layers

13

ARQ (Automatic Repeat Request) protocols

• A technique used to ensure accurate delivery of a data stream despite errors during transmission

• Form a basis for peer-to-peer protocols• Assume that

– There is a connection between peers– The channel is error-prone– A sequence of information blocks for transfer

Page 14: application layers

14

Typical ARQ protocols• Assume unidirectional transmission, consider

bidirectional transmission later– Stop-and-wait ARQ– Go-back-N ARQ

• Based on ARQs,– Sliding-window flow control– Reliable stream service (TCP preview)

• Data link layer protocols --HDLC (High-level Data Link Control)

--PPP (Point-to-Point protocol)

Page 15: application layers

15

Stop-and-Wait ARQ

• Transmitter sends one frame and waits for acknowledgment

• Receiver acknowledges the receiving of the frame• After receiving acknowledgment, transmitter

sends the next frame• In case the transmitted frame or returned

acknowledgment was lost, the transmitter’s timer will time out, the transmitter resends the frame

Page 16: application layers

16

A

B

One frame

ACK

Another frame

ACK

timeAnotherframe

Figure 5.9

Stop-and-Wait ARQ

•Transmitter A sends one frame and waits for acknowledgment

•Receiver B acknowledges the receiving of the frame

•After receiving acknowledgment, transmitter A sends the next frame

Any Problem with it?Transmitted frame may lost, the acknowledgment may lost.

How to solve?Set up timer, when timer times out, resends the frame

Page 17: application layers

17

(a) Frame 1 lost or badly garbled

A

B

Oneframe

Another frame

ACK

The frame

ACK

timeTime-out

Anotherframe

(b) ACK lostA

B

Oneframe

Anotherframe

ACK

theframe

ACK

timeTime-out

Anotherframe

ACK

Figure 5.9

Using timer to retransmit the frame when a frame or acknowledgement lost

Any problem? Frame was received twice when ACK lost.

How to solve it?Introduce sequence number (SN) into frame and discard duplicate frame

Page 18: application layers

18

Go-back-N ARQ• Sends enough frames to keep channel busy and

then waits for ACK• ACK to one frame validates all frames ahead of

this frame (called accumulated ACK)• If ACK for a frame is not received before time

out, all outstanding frames are retransmitted.

Page 19: application layers

19

A

B

fr0

timefr1

fr2

fr3

fr4

fr5

fr6

fr3

ACK1 error

Out-of-sequence frames

Go-Back-4: 4 frames are outstanding; so go back 4

fr5

fr6

fr4

fr7

fr8

fr9

ACK2

ACK3

ACK4

ACK5

ACK6

ACK7

ACK8

ACK9

Figure 5.13

Basic Go-back-N ARQ

1. A sends 0,1,2,3 frames then waits for ACK2. ACK1 just comes in time and A sends one more frame: 43. ACK2 and 3 come and A sends frame 5 and 64. Frame 3 lost and no ACK for it5. B discards out-of-sequence frame 4,5,6 6. A exhausts its window (4 frames) and does not receive ACK, so resends all outstanding frames 3,4,5,6, called Go-back N

Page 20: application layers

Sliding Window Protocols

• Bidirectional Protocol• Each frame contains a sequence number• Sliding window refers to a imaginary boxes at the

transmitter and receiver.• At any instant of time , the sender maintains a set of

sequence numbers corresponding to the frames permitted to send.

• The receiver also maintains a receiver window corresponding to the set of frames permitted to accept

Page 21: application layers

Sliding Window

Figure 10-11

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Page 22: application layers

Sliding window

• The sequence number within a sender’s window represents the no of frames sent but not yet acknowledged.

• The receiving window corresponds to the frames the receiver may accept.

Page 23: application layers

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Sender Sliding Window

Page 24: application layers

Figure 10-13

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Receiver Sliding Window

Page 25: application layers

Figure 10-14

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Sliding Window Example

Page 26: application layers

Figure 10-14-continued

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Sender

Page 27: application layers

WCB/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998

Receiver