application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment: an indian scenario
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [University of California Santa Cruz]On: 09 October 2014, At: 15:27Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
International Journal of RemoteSensingPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tres20
Application of geospatial technologiesfor environmental impact assessment:an Indian ScenarioD. R. Satapathy a , Y. B. Katpatal b & S. R. Wate aa Environmental Impact & Risk Assessment Division , NationalEnvironmental Engineering Research Institute , Nehru Marg,Nagpur 20, Indiab Department of Civil Engineering , Visvesvaraya National Instituteof Technology , Nagpur 11, IndiaPublished online: 10 Apr 2008.
To cite this article: D. R. Satapathy , Y. B. Katpatal & S. R. Wate (2008) Application of geospatialtechnologies for environmental impact assessment: an Indian Scenario, International Journal ofRemote Sensing, 29:2, 355-386, DOI: 10.1080/01431160701269002
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160701269002
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever orhowsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arisingout of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impactassessment: an Indian Scenario
D. R. SATAPATHY*{, Y. B. KATPATAL{ and S. R. WATE{
{Environmental Impact & Risk Assessment Division, National Environmental
Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 20, India
{Department of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology,
Nagpur 11, India
(Received 20 October 2006; in final form 15 Jaunary 2007 )
Geospatial technology is an essential component of the Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) process, as environmental resources are directly affected by
changes in the shape and extent of the proposed disturbance. With the use of
spatial techniques like remote sensing, Geographical Information Systems, and
Global Positioning Systems, EIA has enhanced substantial viewing, movement,
query, and even map-making capabilities. However, one of the main challenges is
to have access to the most up-to-date and accurate geospatial data and
interpretations. With an emphasis on using geospatial data in particular, the
value of the information resource is far higher than is generally available with
text and numeric information. This paper focuses on discussing the application of
geospatial tools in environmental monitoring and the effective analysis of the
natural resources for developmental planning, policy formulation, and decision-
making. Several specific relevant applications of geospatial tools to integrate EIA
are presented in the context of an Indian scenario. Applications have included
monitoring of natural resources (air, water, land, etc.), ground-level ozone, soil
erosion, study of sea-level rise due to global warming, change-detection studies,
delineation of ecologically sensitive areas using digital-image analysis and
Geographic Information Systems. This study focuses on the possibility of using a
proposed spatial-decision-support system to conduct EIA, which should make it
possible to upload, evaluate, maintain, and report field and analytical data that
have been stored in a variety of formats.
1. Introduction
Interdisciplinary work in science has been driven in recent years at least partly by
new technologies that meet the needs of several disciplines simultaneously. India is a
country of great geographical diversity and natural resources. In spite of its wealth
of natural resources, India is still considered a developing country. An increase in
population and conflicting demands for their basic needs have led to a great portion
of the natural resources being used in an unsustainable manner. The Indian rural
environment has suffered an accelerating depletion of vegetation, leading to a
diminishing soil fertility, soil erosion, and increasingly severe drought impact due to
groundwater scarcity and basic amenities required by increasing human and animal
populations. Clearly, sound natural resource management and planning are
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Vol. 29, No. 2, 20 January 2008, 355–386
International Journal of Remote SensingISSN 0143-1161 print/ISSN 1366-5901 online # 2008 Taylor & Francis
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journalsDOI: 10.1080/01431160701269002
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
essential to tackle the aforementioned problems and to bring about sustainable
development. Therefore, environmental and natural-resource information should be
available at all levels of the public and decision-makers to support the decision-
making process and in planning for sound natural-resource management leading to
sustainable development and environmental protection for the country in general.
Many organizations have provided a wide variety of high-quality environmental
data and information in spatial format on India to improve the Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) studies (http://www.eicinformation.org). Since
Geographical Information Systems (GIS) provide flexibility in combining layers
of information according specifically to the user’s requirements, in analysing
environmental damage, they are mostly used for environmental monitoring and
spatial analysis of environmental data for the decision-making process. However,there is a lack of impact prediction using various modelling capabilities of GIS for
specific case studies due to the unavailability of GIS interfaces with many
environmental-modelling software packages. Thus, EIA requires a specifically
designed module which can cover all aspects of the study including anticipated
impacts and suggesting mitigation measures, important facets of EIA. A study
showing the analysis of about 20 years of total ozone content (TOC ) derived from
TOMS Nimbus-7, Meteor-3, and Earth Probe satellite observation has clearly
shown that the TOC trend over Srinagar, India is of the same order of magnitude asthat over Athens and across the Mediterannean region, keeping almost the same
seasonal behaviour (Efstathiou et al. 2003).
The activities carried out for any industrial development have impacts on surface
cover and environment. Renewable natural resources, i.e. land, water, and forests,
as well as other forms of biodiversity, which meet the basic needs for food, water,clothing, and shelter, are now deteriorating. Advanced techniques in remote sensing
and GIS in conjunction with Global Positioning Systems (GPS) can offer
environmentalists, developers, and planners the means they need for ensuring the
safety of the population, sustainable management of available resources, and
decision-making processes. Remote sensing, GIS, and GPS technologies have been
applied in many developmental projects to conduct EIA studies.
A geospatial database has been developed for environmental datasets. Some of
the indicators for environmental monitoring are rainfall, vegetation, ground-level
ozone, carbon dioxide, water-quality parameters, air-quality parameters, baseline
land use and land cover, and soil erosion potential mapping typically for mining
projects. An attempt has been made to utilize remote sensing and GIS and GPS
techniques useful for conducting environmental monitoring and assessment with
respect to:
N land-use/land-cover analysis;
N environmental change-detection studies based on multi-temporal satellite data;
N predicting vegetation-cover loss following project implementation;
N mapping soil-erosion intensity over the project area;
N mapping environmentally/ecologically sensitive areas or hotspots;
N selecting potential sites for environmental restoration measures;
N dispersion of pollutants;
N terrain models used to estimate shadow regions, slope and aspect allocation/
siting: allocation of land for different resources, etc.;
N preparing comprehensive thematic maps for planners, decision-makers, and
environmentalists.
356 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
To bring about development by utilizing natural resources sustainably, environ-
mental and natural resource information should be available to people and policy
decision-makers. Therefore, applications of geospatial technologies play a crucial
and inevitable role for environmental monitoring and natural-resource mapping
(Yilma 2004). Hence, a spatial decision-support system has been proposed which
can add spatial/non-spatial data, display the monitoring status graphically, and
assess impacts using modelling and analytical techniques.
2. EIA using geospatial techniques
EIA is a legislative procedure to combine a development successfully with
environmental conservation and to realize sustainable development. A crucial and
mandatory component for environmental assessment is the prediction of the likely
consequences of implementing developmental projects, designing the appropriate
preventive or mitigating measures for negative impacts, and enhancement measures
for positive impact.
Developmental projects often impact adversely on the environment.
Environmental pollution and degradation are intensified by both human activities
(anthropogenic activities) and natural occurrences (adverse climatic conditions).
Such activities as construction, mineral and natural-resource exploitation, oil and
gas exploration, and unsustainable agricultural practices affect the environment the
most (Arimoro et al. 2002). Man’s environment, which encompasses physical,
chemical, biological, and social entities, is dynamic. All these entities can be grouped
into physical and social systems (Erickson 1994).
EIA encompasses the generation of baseline information on land cover,
vegetation pattern, geomorphology, hydrogeology, drainage pattern, air, water,
and noise quality, socio-economics, etc. to assess the possible impacts and feasibility
of a project activity. The adoption of advanced technologies like remote sensing and
GIS provides accurate and synoptic spatial and temporal databases on vegetation
and land cover, surface hydrology, and aerosols for larger areas in a time- and cost-
effective way. A study of long-range persistence in global Aerosol Index (AI)
dynamics was carried out from satellite observations on different timescales using
Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) (Varotsos et al. 2006). These inputs are
useful in site selection and for assessing baseline status prior to the establishment of
project activities. In addition, it is also useful in drawing up effective Environmental
Management Plans (EMP), which includes catchment-treatment plans, compensa-
tory afforestation activities, resettlement and rehabilitation activities, land reclama-
tion and temporal monitoring of effectiveness of EMPs, etc. Satellite remote-sensing
data have been effectively used in site selection, loss of agriculture/forest lands due
to project activities, route alignment for power grids/pipe lines, ecological
monitoring of thermal power plants, assessment of mining impacts, submergence
area studies, impacts on wetlands, etc.
In the area of EIA, GIS has yielded excellent results by combining the areas of
each individual assessment case and overlapping them with satellite remote-sensing
data. Thereby, one can detect where the changes are in the landscape and vegetation
before and after development, and determine whether the results of the development
match the original proposals. In the future, aerial photography can be employed to
measure changes in landscape to prevent developments that damage the environ-
ment.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 357
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
The first systems evolved in the late 1960s, and by the mid-1970s they were used
for EIA. In 1972, a computerized version of the technique was used for siting power
lines and roads (Munn 1975). It is noteworthy that the so-called ‘first GIS’ (Canada
GIS or CGIS) was used for EIA in the late 1970s for the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a dam on the river Thames (Muthusamy
and Ramalingam 2003). However, the use of GIS in the EIA process for scoping in
particular has been limited, due to the high costs in terms of time and money,
relative to the time and budgets allocated for EIA preparation. There are several
noteworthy complex, though sporadic, reports on the uses of GIS for EIA such as
using GIS in complex modelling representation techniques (Schaller 1990) or its
potential as a repository of data and cumulative impact assessment (Johnston et al.
1988).
2.1 GIS approaches in EIA that may involve screening, scoping, monitoring, andassessment in India
These include the following:
N initial environmental examination (IEE);
N monitoring and interpretation of baseline data;
N assessing impacts (especially cumulative impacts);
N identifying and analysing project alternatives (geographic location/site selec-
tion, overall design and choice of technology);
N mapping of data during monitoring and auditing;
N helping in decision-making or policy formulation;
N environmental impact auditing.
3. Geospatial tools
One of the major challenges in conducting an EIA study is to have access to the
most current and accurate geospatial data and interpretations. The geospatial data
and geographic extents are constantly changing. Further analysis must be done at
both local and regional scales with respect to different timescales. Scale effects
should be measured separately for spatial extent and spatial detail, and both
quantitatively using a GIS and qualitatively using the judgement of EIA experts
(Joao 2002). The study found that changes in scale could affect the results of EIAs.
For example, the impact significance and the number of houses affected by air
pollution from the road varied according to the scale used. The conventional EIA
procedure gives accurate results for all the aspects and contaminants, and the geo-
spatial technique can be employed for detecting only a few major pollutants, which
can be tracked by satellite remote sensing and can be represented in GIS. The geo-
spatial EIA technique also facilitates comparison of the spread of pollution at
different times and also allows for a pictorial representation of the extent of
environmental pollution over a specific period (Patil et al. 2002). Traditionally,
when utilizing GIS, data are classified into graphic data and attribute data. Graphic
data are large in quantity and contain few changes, and usually attribute data are
large in quantity and highly changeable. Therefore, these two types of data are
stored in different databases. Attribute databases are often structured relationally.
Their techniques and implementation are well established. To meet the requirements
358 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
of environmental protection management, the graphic database is divided into three
categories: vector data, satellite data, and GPS data
3.1 Remote sensing
This is the scientific technology that can be used to measure and monitor important
biophysical characteristics and human activities on earth (Jensen 2000). Managing
the earth’s natural resources and planning future developments are important for
acquiring accurate spatial information through GIS to create important layers of
biophysical, land use/land cover and socio-economic conditions in a GIS database
derived from analysis of remotely sensed data (Star et al. 1991). Remote sensing can
be used to identify and isolate regional to sub regional objects/factors of significance
in an EIA in a time- and cost-effective manner
Remotely sensed data are collected using a passive or active remote-sensing
system. However, satellite imageries integrated with other data sets are more
accurate in delineating land use/land cover. Among the most widely used
environmental-monitoring systems will be remote sensing of the earth’s oceans,
land, and atmosphere. Remote-sensing instruments mounted on orbiting satellites
or aircraft produce map-like images and gather other non-pictorial data about the
environment, including land use, vegetation cover, water, temperature, and air
pollution. Remote observations of the biological effective solar ultraviolet
irradiance, made using instrumentation flown on a Falcon aircraft over the entire
area of Greece, from the sea up to the tropopause level obtained in the frame of
radiation field in the troposphere and access to aircraft have shown that an average
increase of about 7.2¡1.2% km21, which is in close agreement with the theoretically
derived value (Varotsos et al. 2001a).
3.2 GIS
The ability to combine maps with associated tabular data distinguishes GIS from
other information systems and makes it valuable for a wide range of uses for public
and private organizations in the assessment of status, explaining events and changes,
predicting outcomes, developing plans, and monitoring activities in the natural
resources and environmental fields. Atmospheric turbidity in conjunction with the
trends of solar radiation components reflects rapid urbanization and industrializa-
tion (Jacovides et al. 1994). Recent Internet techniques have been developed with
exceptional progress, thus showing that GIS opens up special opportunities and
prospects in the area of sustainable development. The above-mentioned information
can be stored on the Internet. The World Bank has strongly endorsed GIS as a tool
for EIA (Hassan and Kjorven 1993, World Bank 1993, Eedy 1995, Hassan 1995).
3.2.1 Advantages of GIS in EIA. These are as follows:
N provides a systematic approach for the collection of environmental informa-
tion;
N makes the data used in EIA preparation accessible to all decision-makers;
N facilitates the analysis of environmental impacts, which otherwise might be
undetected or ignored due to analytical difficulties or high costs;
N increases the compatibility and comparability of diverse data sets;
N reduces the overall costs and institutional overlap in collection and manage-
ment of environmental information;
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 359
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
N it is easy to update the GIS database;
N it is easy to produce illustrative maps, tables, and other analysis results (World
Bank 1993).
Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) or Community-Integrated GIS (CIGIS) aims at
increasing the number and diversity of people who are capable of participating in
spatial decision-making, i.e.:
N not entirely based on ‘expert knowledge’;
N assumes that local knowledge is valuable;
N increases the access base to digital data and spatial information;
N incorporates socially differentiated landscape perceptions;
N can be used to integrate GIS and multimedia;
N enables more democratic spatial decision-making.
3.2.2 Typical uses of GIS in a specific case study of EIA. These are as follows:
N describing the distribution and condition of natural resources and areas of
concern;
N identifying the nature, sources, magnitude, and location of environmental
stresses in an ecosystem;
N describing the current and potential level of exposure to a given stress in an
ecosystem;
N assessing the response of an ecosystem to existing and potential stresses;
N assisting in the evaluation of risks to an ecosystem from exposure to various
stresses;
N Habitat Suitability Index: habitat quality for wildlife population has a spatial
component across large geographic areas (Lai et al. 2000). Habitat Suitability
Index (HSI) models have been widely used to document the quality and quantity
of available habitat for a specific wildlife species. In impact assessment, HSI
represents the best long-term evaluator of the overall project (Eedy 1995).
3.3 GPS
The utility of GPS in the field of environmental monitoring is immensely useful. It
involves receiving GPS satellite data at any time under any climate at location with a
good communication channel and calculating the position coordinates of the
receiver. GPS is a method of rapid measurement. It can be applied to different
spatial positions of important landmarks, such as factories, industrial sites, disaster
areas, water-supply districts, etc. (www.epa.gov.tw/ENGLISH/offices/L/egis.htm).
GPS applications in natural-resource management include inventory and mapping
of soils, vegetation types, threatened endangered species, lake and stream
boundaries, and wildlife habitats. The habitat suitability for these species can serve
as an indicator for the zoning of protection areas and a better integration of species
protection with landscape planning at local and sub-regional levels (Weiers et al.
2004). GPS has been used to aid in damage assessment after natural disasters such as
fires, floods, and earthquakes. GPS has also been used to map ecologically sensitive
sites and for infrastructure (streets, highways, and utilities) mapping, management,
and planning for future growth as a partial fulfillment to the EIA study.
360 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
The data obtained by GIS can be used not only by the environmental authorities
but also by the public and regulatory agencies. The public may well become
accustomed to using the Internet to obtain environmental information from GIS
(www.esri.com). The integration of environmental datasets with geospatial
technologies to assess environmental quality can be achieved through the following
steps, which will be demonstrated with case studies (figure 1).
4. Application of geospatial technologies for different EIA studies
Increasingly, GIS is used as the organizational framework for environmental
management and monitoring programmes through the services providing spatial
analysis and modelling, database development, customized GIS design and
implementation, Internet map services, and map layout and production. Similarly,
remote-sensing data can provide valuable information to complement traditional
ground-based environmental assessment and monitoring sources through the
Figure 1. Flow chart showing the integration of environmental datasets with geospatialtechnologies to assess environmental quality.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 361
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
services providing digital-image processing, spatial analysis, and field validation.
The following case studies have been conducted using an image analysis system
(IAS) and GIS software, viz. ESRI ArcGIS ArcInfo and ArcView 8.3, ArcSDE,
MapInfo, ArcView 3.x and PCI Geomatica 10.0 and Global Positioning System
Garmin e-Trex Legend.
4.1 Base map
Base maps refer to basic topographic maps, which show basic information or
general characteristics of the mapping area without emphasis on any particular
factors. The main considerations for base maps are scale, accuracy, and data
coverage including rivers, roads, and administrative boundaries. Currently, two
widely used topographic maps in India are the 1 : 25 000/1 : 50 000 basic topographic
maps provided by Survey of India. With the GIS functions of spatial analysis, such
as overlay analysis and buffer analysis, and functions of handling attribute data, the
GIS-based map overlay method can assess road environmental impacts in large and
complicated areas, by overlaying various environmental vulnerability grade maps
and distribution maps of impact extent coefficient (Li et al. 1999).
4.1.1 Method used. The base map was prepared by scanning the toposheets of
1 : 50 000 scales at a good resolution published by Survey of India, Government of
India. Then, the scanned maps were geocoded with the help of image-processing
software and then georeferenced to a required projection system with required
ellipsoid. Then, different layers like road, river, railway, etc. were digitized with the
help of GIS software. A Case Study of Generating Base Map for Chandrapur
district Mining Area is presented in (figure 2).
4.2 Environmental monitoring data
Environmental monitoring of water resources, including streams, lakes, estuaries
and near-shore marine habitats through sampling and analysis of data collected
from water, sediment, fish and other biota (animals and plants), air-quality data,
noise data, etc. utilizing a combination of statistical analysis, weight of evidence and
expert knowledge, quantitative analytical data, and trend analysis to assess
environmental impacts and levels of compliance can be integrated with GIS
technologies to complement traditional environmental management. Monitoring
environmental data is one of the major sources of data for EIA, which can be
integrated with GIS. A typical heavy-metal concentration monitoring in water
bodies is presented here. Various sampling locations have been selected with the help
of GPS based on the source of pollution. The heavy-metal concentration of samples
has been added as attribute data with the help of GIS software. A case study of
representing heavy-metal concentrations using GIS is presented (figure 3).
4.3 Thematic maps
Thematic maps are usually based on base maps, on which a thematic phenomenon
has been added. The main purpose of a thematic map is to emphasize the factor of
interest, e.g. data layers created from the distribution of air-quality surveying data.
A study of diurnal variation of surface ozone at Athens using a re-evaluated historic
record of surface ozone mixing ratios, measured at the National Observatory of
362 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
Athens for the period 1901–1940, using De James colometric papers can be
represented as different themes (Cartalis and Varotsos 1994, Varotsos et al. 2001b).
Thematic maps are prepared by adding different layers to the area of interest. A case
study of prediction of ground-level ozone concentration using inverse distance
weight interpolation (IDW) in Chandrapur district is presented in figure 4.
4.4 Other attribute and statistical data
Other attribute data include social, political, and economic information. These
data can be acquired officially through the national administrative
information-management network. The use of other attribute and statistical data
will increase public confidence in environmental information.
Figure 2. Base map for Chandrapur district, Maharashtra.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 363
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
4.5 Land use/land cover mapping
Land management, where anthropogenic pressures are increasing at the expense of
safety and natural resources, requires rapid and accurate mapping of land
Figure 3. Drainage network with heavy-metal concentration monitoring in Chandrapurdistrict, Maharashtra.
364 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
disturbances (Bobrowsky 2002). Monitoring of general land-cover changes or more
specific themes such as land degradation is also an important aspect of ‘change’ of
the land surface. Land management and land-use planning are related to one
another, and land management often follows development under the guidance of
land-use plans. Land-use planning is an important environmental issue, as sound
land-use planning is essential for economic development, for avoiding conflicts
between land uses, and for maintaining a high quality of life in communities (Jensen
2000).
4.5.1 Spatial-data acquisition and assembly. At the core of a landscape approach
to monitoring ecological status and trends is the basic need for quantifiable and
consistent spatial data of biophysical characteristics (e.g. land use and land cover)
on national, regional, and local scales. Multiple-date landscape data permit
calculation of landscape indicators at different time intervals, and changes in these
values can then be interpreted with regards to potential changes in natural-resource
conditions.
Land-use and land-cover data are often derived from some type of overhead,
remotely sensed imagery such as aerial photographs and digital satellite data.
Various classifications of land use and land cover are derived from imagery based on
manual interpretations or a variety of digital-processing techniques, depending on
the application. Remote-sensing data and resources also provide valuable
environmental monitoring services such as change detection, topographic analysis,
and various types of mapping, indicator development, and analytical support to
environmental regulatory programmes.
4.5.2 Supervised statistical classification. There are several types of statistics-based
supervised classification algorithms. Some of the more popular ones are (in
Figure 4. Three-dimensional model of the interpolated surface for the GLO ozone data.Ground-level ozone concentration in Chandrapur district, Maharashtra.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 365
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
increasing complexity); parallelepiped, minimum distance, maximum likelihood,
and mahalanobis distance. With supervised statistical classification algorithms, the
analyst must first locate and define samples in the image of each class that are
required for the final map. These samples are called training areas. Once a sufficient
number of training areas are selected, the supervised classification is then run. The
algorithm then compares each pixel in the image with the different training areas to
determine which training area is most ‘similar’ to the pixel in the image. Once the
most ‘similar’ training area is found, the image pixel is labelled with the respective
land-cover class. The two primary reasons for visiting the area that is being mapped
are to collect data that can be used to train the algorithm or the interpreter and to
collect data that can be used to evaluate the land-cover map and estimate the
accuracy of the individual classes (a process called validation). In the needs of
assessment, some thought should be given to the required accuracy of the final map.
The accuracy can refer to either spatial accuracy or thematic accuracy. Spatial
accuracy is directly related to the base information that is used. If it is using satellite
imagery, the spatial accuracy of the final map will be dictated by the spatial accuracy
of the satellite image that was used to create the map.
4.5.3 Accuracy assessment. Thematic accuracy specifies how well individual
mapped classes match what is on the ground. For example, if the map indicates
that there is forest at a particular location, what is the actual land-cover type? Error
is inherent to the mapping process, and determining an acceptable level of error
requires careful thought. Factors affecting accuracy include: the quality and type of
the base data, the experience of the analyst, the analyst’s familiarity with the area
being classified, and the level of detail of the classification scheme. A case study of
land-use/land-cover analysis is presented in figure 5, and the inventory of land-use/
land-cover status is presented in table 1.
4.6 Analysis of impacts of land-use change on vegetation using spatial techniques
There are several different methods of change detection to assess the change in
biophysical characteristics. In this study, an attempt was made to determine the
change in vegetation cover using change-detection approaches, viz. traditional post-
classification and NDVI analysis (Lunetta and Elvidge 1999). With the land-use and
land-cover change resulting from the afforestation, agricultural improvement,
natural vegetation growth, and shifting cultivation, there is a requirement to develop
a database for rapid and cost-effective mapping and monitoring of extensive areas
of land to determine their conservation value (Griffiths et al. 1980). Interference of
shifting cultivation, intensification of agriculture activities, and changes in cropping
patterns contribute to conversion of fallow land to forest land and barren land to
open forest.
Post-classification analysis is a simple method for change detection which involves
the classification of each of the images independently, followed by a comparison of the
corresponding pixel (thematic) labels to identify areas where change has occurred.
Results can then be displayed in a change matrix or a change map. Change studies can
also be carried out with the analysis of normalized differential vegetation index.
Unfortunately, every error in the individual data classification map will also be
present in the final change-detection map. Therefore, it is very important that the
individual classification maps used in the post-classification change-detection
method be as accurate as possible. The post-classification comparison method
366 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
Figure 5. False-colour composite and land-use/land-cover status in Pamban Island, India.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 367
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
provides complete change information reducing the impact of atmospheric and
environmental differences to a minimum and makes it possible to classify imageries
recorded at different time periods. Post-classification comparison involves the
classification of each of the images shown independently, followed by a comparison
of the corresponding pixels to identify areas where a change has occurred. Post-
classification comparisons of derived thematic maps go beyond simple change
detection and attempt to quantify the different types of change. The degree of success
depends upon the reliability of the maps with the image classification (Shalaby and
Tateishi 2007). Based on the two classification maps, a post-classification comparison
was performed, and a change correlation matrix obtained using the overlay technique
for two classified maps. The results are displayed in a change matrix (table 2). Using
the matrix, the changes in land cover in the study area can be analysed. The diagonal
matrix indicates no change in corresponding land-use\land-cover classes for two
different years. The upper diagonal matrix indicates the changed land covers for the
present year, converted from different land-use\land-cover classes in the previous
year. The lower diagonal matrix indicates the changed land covers for the previous
year, converted from different land-use\land-cover classes in the present year.
4.6.1 Method used. The method adopted is shown in figure 6.
4.6.2 Mapping temporal changes of vegetation using the DNDVI technique. The
vegetation index differencing technique was used to analyse the change in vegetation
(green) versus non-vegetation (non-green) with the two temporal datasets. NDVI is
based on the principle of spectral difference based on strong vegetation absorbance
in the red and strong reflectance in the near-infrared part of the spectrum. The
difference in NDVI is useful in distinguishing between the increase and decrease in
vegetation cover based on the following equation (Ramachandra and Kumar 2004).
The procedure for change detection using DNDVI is shown in figure 7.
DNDVI~ IR{Rð Þ= IRzRð Þt2{ IR{Rð Þ= IRzRð Þt1: ð1Þ
t1 and t2 in the equation denote the two different dates, where t1 denotes 27
February 1997 and t2 15 February 2004. Similarly, DNDVI was also calculated for
different time periods: 3 May 1993–21 May 2004, 27 February 1997–15 February
2004, and 3 May 1993–27 February 1997 (figure 8).
Table 1. Inventory of land-use/land-cover status in Pamban Island, based on satellite datafrom May 2002.
Category
Inventory by IRS 1D LISS III + PAN May 2002
Area (ha) Percentage of total
Vegetation cover 1 717.835 7.438Vegetation cover 2 2758.664 28.585Fringe vegetation 866.136 8.974Turbid water 460.603 4.772Mud flats 97.185 1.012Sand bar 1261.951 13.076Fallow land 776.699 8.048Shrub 804.056 8.331Barren sandy 427.754 4.432Degraded land 1479.719 15.332Total 9650.602 100
368 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
Table 2. Comparison matrix of land-use/land-cover change analysis in and around Karlapat Bauxite Plateau.
Change detectionfor 1993 to 1997
Land use/land cover for February 1997
Denseforest
Openforest
Fallowland
Bare soil/sand Barren land
Cropland
Land with/withoutscrub
Waterbodies
River/streams Settlement
Landuse/landcoverforMay1993
Dense forest 386.304 175.91 94.188 66.699 22.190 7.86355 31.298 0.00922 0.11405 0.0000Open forest 76.4916 50.318 6.9546 9.5322 4.5250 2.44627 7.7961 0.00115 0.02765 0.0000Fallow land 120.586 108.45 151.68 63.755 94.495 13.3810 87.046 0.08986 0.47981 0.0241Bare soil/
sand0.06451 0.9463 1.4993 29.871 41.904 6.14765 39.237 0.01555 0.75954 0.4377
Barren land 3.51763 17.595 38.453 43.720 209.15 50.6931 73.423 0.35597 15.4857 1.9768Crop land 17.4585 72.047 16.570 11.411 12.289 13.6535 28.211 0.00403 0.23328 0.0092Land with/
withoutscrub
15.2968 65.844 38.511 27.425 70.269 32.9137 111.89 0.49306 6.46733 0.1042
Water bodies 0.12557 0.1157 0.3450 0.0616 0.2160 0.08640 0.0812 0.37382 0.61747 0.0000River/
streams0.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0270 0.0000 0.00000 0.0000 0.00000 24.7345 0.0000
Settlement 0.00000 0.0005 0.0115 0.0000 0.0622 0.01786 0.0063 0.00000 0.01152 5.5451
Ap
plica
tion
of
geo
spa
tial
techn
olo
gies
for
enviro
nm
enta
lim
pa
cta
ssessmen
t3
69D
ownl
oade
d by
[U
nive
rsity
of
Cal
ifor
nia
Sant
a C
ruz]
at 1
5:27
09
Oct
ober
201
4
4.7 Aquaculture facility assessment and mangrove mapping
The ecological and commercial problems of shrimp culture are largely related to the
removal of mangroves. Practically in all aquaculture systems, operators cut the
mangrove forest and construct dykes, with sluice gates to retain water. The original
tidal regime, which is essential for the survival of mangrove tree species, is totally
disturbed (Rajitha et al. 2007). Areas of environmental monitoring of aquaculture
facilities and ecological sensitive mangrove were conducted for the Godavari
Estuary, Andhra Pradesh. The mangrove formations of Godavari estuary are
formed due to silting over many centuries. The estuary covers an area of 62 000 ha, of
which dense Coringa mangrove forest spreads over 6600 ha. Satellite sensor data were
used to detect changes in the mangrove cover for a period of 12 years (1992–2004)
Figure 6. Flow chart for the study approach for post-classification comparison.
370 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
(table 3, figure 9). It was found that an area of about 1250 ha of mangroves was
destroyed by anthropogenic interference such as aquaculture, tree felling, etc. The
increase in the mangrove front towards the coast was also delineated using remote-
sensing data. The major advantages of remote-sensing data is in monitoring changes
periodically. The combination of moderate- and high-resolution data provided
detailed coastal land-use maps for implementing coastal regulation measures. It was
found that the mangrove’s spectral response/digital number (DN) values are much
lower than those of non-mangrove vegetation such as plantations and paddy fields in
the SWIR band. By taking this as an advantage, spectral data were utilized for clear
demarcation of mangroves from nearby paddy fields and other vegetation. Since
habitat loss and fragmentation are major threats to biodiversity, EIA and strategic
environmental assessment are essential instruments used in physical planning to
address such problems (Gontier et al. 2006). Simpson’s diversity index (SDI), which is
a measure of biodiversity, was found to be 0.09, thus indicating mangrove dominance.
Ecological parameters such as mud-flats/swamps, mangrove cover alterations, and
biodiversity status have been studied in detail for 12 years. Highly potential
environmentally sensitive areas as categorized in table 4 require immediate conserva-
tion and development. Overall, simple and viable measures are suggested, based on
multi-spectral data to sustain this sensitive coastal ecology useful for public
administration, regulatory agencies, and policymakers.
4.8 Assessment of vegetation cover mapping in and around Nagpur Urban city usingthe NDVI technique
Cities are a magnet for the growth of social, economic, and political development of
the country. They hold the power for the development of large-scale and small-scale
industries, educational institutions, administrative offices, public and commercial
establishments, etc. In turn, they attract more migration from the rural areas to the
Figure 7. Flow chart for change detection using the NDVI technique.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 371
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
urban areas, or shifting from one urban centre to another urban centre. Thus, the
population density is increasing in certain pockets of the cities, and so vegetation
cover mapping in and around a city is important. A typical vegetation cover
mapping around Nagpur city is estimated using the NDVI technique (table 5,
figure 10). Nearly all satellite vegetation indices employ this difference formula to
quantify the density of plant growth on the earth. The NDVI is the difference
Figure 8. Change maps using the NDVI technique for Karlapat Bauxite plateau, Orissa.
372 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
Table 3. Land-use/land-cover change detection based on the satellite data from 1992 and2004 in Godavari Estuary.
Category
Inventory by IRS 1BLISS II March 1992
Inventory by IRS P6LISS III January 2004
Change inarea (ha)Area (ha)
Percentageof total Area (ha)
Percentageof total
Settlement 6084.97 2.63 9801.8 4.23 ( + )3716.832 Mangrove Dense 4428.30 1.91 8169.5 3.53 ( + )3741.23 Mangrove Sparse 12 977.7 4.60 7982.9 3.44 (2)4994.84 Crop land 52 449.6 23.63 44 941 19.39 (2)7508.65 Fallow land 27 125.1 11.70 10 750 4.64 (2)16 375.16 Plantation 11 571.2 4.99 11 362 4.90 (2)209.27 Barren land 5471.71 2.36 14 030 6.05 ( + )8558.298 Land with/without
Scrub8498.52 3.66 17 016 7.34 ( + )8517.48
9 Bare Soil/Sand 3795.59 1.63 4557.7 1.96 ( + )762.1110 Deep water 64 293.7 27.741 75 984 32.78 ( + )11 690.311 Shallow water 24 207.3 10.44 22 609 9.76 (2)1598.312 Aquaculture 827.626 0.35 2970.4 1.28 ( + )2142.7713 Mud flat 475.891 0.20 1586.4 0.685 ( + )1110.51
Total 231 763 100.00 231 763 231 763
Table 4. Priority-based category environmentally sensitive area for conservation.
Potential area for land-resource development Suggested optimal land use Priority for development
Crop land in Kharif/Rabiseason
Intensive agriculture, agro-horticulture
High priority
Mangroves Regeneration, protection andconservation of mangroves asa biosphere and wildlife reserve
High priority
Sandy area Development of shelter belts ofplantations to protect from seaerosion
High priority
Table 5. Inventory of different vegetation covers in and around Nagpur City.
Sr. no.Land-use/land-cover
classes NDVI range Area (ha)Area as a
percentage (%)
1 Non-vegetation 21 to 0.0977 20 659.04 58.792 Vegetation 1 0.0977–0.1445 6115.29 17.403 Vegetation 2 0.1446–0.2073 5222.61 14.864 Vegetation 3 0.2074–0.2382 1325.04 3.774 Vegetation 4 0.2383–1 1825.05 5.19
Total 35 137.03 100
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 373
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
Figure 9. Comparision of the ecologically sensitive mangrove spread in Godavari Esturary,India.
Figure 10. Vegetation cover mapping using the NDVI technique in Nagpur city.
374 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
between near-infrared (NIR, channel 2) and visible (VIS, channel 1) reflectance
values normalized over the sum of channels 1 and 2 ((NIR – VIS)/(NIR + VIS)). The
NDVI equation produces values in the range of –1.0 to 1.0, where increasing
positive values indicate increasing green vegetation, and negative values indicate
non-vegetated surface features such as water, barren land, ice, and snow or clouds.
Written mathematically, the formula is:
NDVI~ NIR{REDð Þ= NIRzREDð Þ: ð2Þ
Calculations of NDVI for a given pixel always result in a number that ranges from
21 to + 1; however, no green leaves give a value close to zero. A zero means no
vegetation, and a value close to + 1 (0.8–0.9) indicates the highest possible density of
green leaves. The methodology adopted is shown in figure 11.
4.9 Environmental studies related to exploration, mine development, and vegetationcover loss assessment subsequent to project implementation
The bauxite deposit is strip-mined and thus will require careful restoration. As per
the proposed set-up/implementation of the project, 972 ha of vegetation cover will
be affected. The estimated loss in vegetation cover includes both mine sites and
proposed alumina refineries, as well as township areas, treatment plants, etc. Also,
vegetation cover includes a small patch of forest (380 ha), crop land, and shrubs
(table 6). The estimation is based on the spatial analysis of the satellite imageries,
viz. IRS P6 LISS III of 15 February 2004 for proposed activities (figure 12).
Figure 11. Methodology adopted for vegetation-cover mapping.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 375
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
4.10 Assessment of the impacts of enhanced sea-level rise on the Indian coast
Research into the environment utilizes GIS and remote-sensing technologies in
several significant ways. Most notable is research into global climatic and
hydrological change. The impact of global warming-induced sea-level rises due to
thermal expansion of near surface ocean water has great significance in India due to
its extensive low-lying and densely populated coastal zones. The USGS DEM for
India was used for the study. The most hazardous areas were identified for 1 m
above sea level by stretching the image between 0 and 1 (figure 13). The eastern coast
of India is largely vulnerable to a rise of 1 m sea level, but the western coast of India
is also vulnerable. States susceptible to this include Orissa, West Bengal, Andhra
Pradesh, Tamilnadu on the east coast, and Gujarat on the west coast of India.
4.11 Assessment of soil-erosion intensity for Chandrapur mining areas
The continents are eroding at an average rate that is in the order of 0.1 mm y21
(1 mm y2151 km Ma21). The present-day rate is approximately double that two
centuries ago. Erosion is largely caused by streams. The use of multi-temporal
remote-sensing images in support of an environmental modelling analysis in a
geographic information system (GIS) environment leading to the identification of a
variety of long-term interactions between land, resources, and the built environment
has been a highly promising approach in recent years (Ning et al. 2006). Estimates of
the sources of modern sediments to the world’s oceans are as follows: rivers 96%
fluvial, eolian erosion 1%, glaciers 1%, and coastal erosion 1% (www.soiler-
osion.html). Generally, the sediment sources are steep foothills, agriculture,
construction, and channel erosions (Trimble 1997). Most of the first three sources
are generated and transported by surface runoff. Channel erosion is related to
channel stability. Failure to control or prevent the loss of soil will result in reduced
crop-based production potential, lower surface water quality, and damaged
drainage networks (Rodda et al 2001). In locating sites that are currently being
eroded at high rates or that have the potential to, ideally soil conservation practices
can be implemented in attempts to lower erosion rates in these areas. Environmental
issues are always spatially orientated. Many computer models have been developed
to predict soil erosion. Erosion-risk analysis can be recommended to determine the
value of natural landscape taking into account the characteristics of the
environment and the nature of the dam construction as a development demand
(Sahin and Kurum 2002). The database of information required by these tools is
Table 6. Proposed estimated vegetation cover loss subsequent to project implementation.
S. no. Proposed plans Total area (ha)Estimated vegetation
cover loss (ha)
1 Ash pond 184.32 29.2032 Bauxite mine area 1811.175 450.8353 Alumina plant 960.077 164.2184 Red mud plant 302.054 54.3755 Railway shed 115.948 28.9156 Township 346.406 168.8837 Water-treatment plant 346.406 16.7628 Conveyor belt (indirectly affect) 116.236 62.035
Total 972
376 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
relatively complex. GIS can handle these spatial data very easily and efficiently. GIS
is a spatial decision-making tool that can assist in the manipulation, organization,
calculation, and integration of multiple soil erosion factors (Jen Bell and Jen
Bryant). In this study, an attempt was made to estimate soil erosion in a mining
area. The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is an erosion model designed to
predict the long-term average soil losses from specific field areas in specific cropping
and management systems. The model takes into account the major factors that
influence soil erosion. These include rainfall patterns, soil types, slope steepness, and
Figure 13. Sea-level rise prediction up to 1-m elevation along the Indian coast.
Figure 12. Estimation of vegetation cover loss subsequent to project implementation.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 377
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
management and conservation practices. Each of these components is included in
the USLE.
A~R|K|LS|C|P, ð3Þ
where A5average annual soil loss; R5rainfall and runoff erosivity index; K5soil
erodibility factor; L5slope length factor; S5slope steepness factor; C5cover
management factor; and P5conservation practice factor.
A typical soil erosion potential area is shown in figure 14.
Figure 14. Map depicting the soil erosion potential in Chandrapr district, Maharashtra.
378 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
4.12 SLOPE stability and digital elevation model for topographical studies
The slope angle (usually called the slope) greatly affects the relative magnitude of
driving forces on slopes. As the angle of a potential slip plane increases, the driving
force also increases, keeping other factors equal. (Keller 1996). The slope map is
derived from the interpolated elevation data. The grid-based DEM has been
generated by the TOPOGRID command for the area (figure 15). Cell-based grid
generation in geo-processing system is integrated with ARC/INFO. TOPOGRID is
a hydrological correct grid of elevation from point, line, and polygon overages. To
create the DEM, contours were first digitized from existing 1 : 50 000 topographic
sheets. These sheets have a 10 m and 20 m contour interval. The contour data were
then input to software that interpolates contours to create a dense matrix of
Figure 15. Map depicting the slope stability in Chandrapur district, Maharashtra.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 379
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
elevation at 24-m resolution and co-register to the landuse data. During
interpolation spot height, waterbodies, and river/stream factors were also
considered. The TOPOGRID command is an interpolation method specifically
designed for the creation of hydrologically correct digital elevation models (DEMs)
from comparatively small but well selected elevation and stream coverages. This is
based on the ANUDEM program developed by Michael Hutchinson (1988, 1989).
4.13 Seismic hazard map
Geospatial tools can be used to facilitate measurement, mapping, monitoring, and
modelling of a variety of data types related to natural phenomena. The specific GIS
application in the field of Risk Assessment is hazard mapping to show earthquake,
landslide, flood, or fire hazards. Seismic zonation mapping is also a vital part of the
natural hazard mapping. A seismic zonation map has been prepared for the
Chandrapur district of Maharashtra (figure 16). This map is prepared based upon adistrict resource map published by Geological Survey of India.
5. Proposed spatial decision-support system to conduct EIA
Planning and management are based on a generic problem-solving process which
begins with problem definition and description, involves various forms of analysis
which might include simulation and modelling, and moves to prediction and then to
prescription or design, which often involves the evaluation of alternative solutions to
the problem. Decision characterizes every stage of this process, while the process ofimplementation of the chosen plan or policy involves this sequence once again. The
proposed structure of SDSS to conduct EIA can be described as follows.
5.1 Data source
Development of database management system (DBMS) from various external data
acquisition systems, provide the input data for the specific application. The data
include both spatial and non-spatial data. Spatial data include remote-sensing data,
toposheets, infrastructure details, environmental zonal maps (air and water quality),natural hazards, soil maps, etc., and non-spatial data mainly include data such as
other monitoring attribute data.
5.2 Analytical modelling
Analytical modelling capabilities are often a part of GIS. The analytical results
should be incorporated as a spatial input to this system with which exchange of
information is required. For example, computer-simulation models may provide
quantitative estimates of air, noise, and water-quality parameters. A numericalevaluation model has been developed to analyse eco-environmental problems in
mountainous regions using remote sensing (RS) and GIS. The spatial principal-
component analysis method is used to determine the variables and their weights (Li
et al. 2006). A review of numerical modelling has been published on the variability
of ozone concentration in the troposphere and can be integrated with GIS to form a
component of a decision-support system (Kondratyev and Varotsos 2001a, 2001b)
5.3 Knowledge base
Expert knowledge plays a vital role in taking decision for which multi-criteria
analysis (MCA) algorithm can be developed using certain programs.
380 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
5.4 DSS models
Different decision schemes can be generated based upon various domain-specific
criteria and knowledgebase.
5.5 Graphical user interface
The graphical user interface will help developers and environmentalists to make
decisions with the help of a graphical display and tabular reporting capabilities with
control and selection options (figure 17).
A spatial decision-support system for environmental planning and EIA should be
feasible for uploading, evaluating, maintaining and reporting field and analytical
Figure 16. Natural-hazard map for Chandrapur district, Maharashtra.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 381
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
data stored in various formats. Once data are uploaded into the system database,
it should be possible to process the data using a variety of query, reporting,
graphical, and statistical tools to determine the most cost-effective methods for
achieving complete regulatory compliance. The system can combine the hands-on
knowledge of environmental-management experts and software-development
professionals with an ease of use that allows the data to be managed quickly and
cost-effectively.
6. Discussion
The amount of environmental data gathered from remote-sensing satellites and
many other sources is overwhelming. Each year, as new systems go into operation,
the data stream increases and becomes more complex. To assist in environmental
monitoring and management decision-making, these data must be available to
researchers in a timely way. Over the past 20 years, sophisticated computer-based
information systems have evolved that have great potential to help in developing
management strategies for sustainable development and environmental protection.
Moreover, GIS allows policymakers to easily visualize problems in relation to
Figure 17. Flow chart for integration of the graphical user interface.
382 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
existing health and social services and the natural environment and so more
effectively target resources. Geospatial tools are very useful in generating new
information and in studying environmental change over time supported by raster
GIS which are used for comparison, statistics, and presentation of findings. Visual
interpretation is normally used for overviews. Supervised digital classification is
only used in smaller areas, and in such cases the field data are sufficient for
calibration and generalization of findings. EIAs are necessary tools for the planning,
evaluation, and monitoring of sustainable development of the environment.
Therefore, EIA needs to be carried out on all proposed projects in India so that
as infrastructure and economic development are enhanced, they will not be to the
detriment of the environment. GIS technology is a very useful method for carrying
out standard EIA. It affords an easy and effective way of assessing impacts of
projects on the environment, and also provides easy-to-read maps, which could be
readily studied by policy formulators. Although developments have been broadly
based across many divergent disciplines, there is still much work required to develop
techniques suited to natural-resource management and environmental monitoring,
refine techniques, improve the accuracy of output, and demonstrate and implement
work in operational systems. The low cost of the imagery is an obvious advantage
for natural resource managers, particularly in developing countries. Urban planners
will find the imagery to be of great interest. Another potential useful application is
the use of this imagery for map making and updating which is slow and expensive,
and a number of agencies have been using satellite imagery for developing basic
information. Perhaps the greatest advantage of rapid delivery of images is for
checking and controlling human activities and impacts. This will allow users to
monitor new developments, as well as design methods to assess whether
environments are degrading as a result of resource utilization.
7. Conclusion
Geospatial tool being an inevitable tool in conducting EIA is a good practice in
making decisions about policies, plans, and implementing projects. Geospatial data
collection, sharing, and access is a problem in India from a cost point of view. From
the previous study, it can inferred that traditional EIA using geospatial tools could
be a successful process in considering certain componenets like baseline information,
anticipated impacts and mitigation measures, and formulating management plans
for subsequent development. GIS and use of a spatial decision-support system to
conduct EIA need to be accelerated to lead decision-makers to make decisions for
environmental clearance in a time- and cost-effective way. Geospatial tools are
immensely useful for spatial data collection, processing, and analysis, and providing
access to spatial information in various development sectors such as mining,
transport, petroleum exploration, tourism, hydroelectric power projects, etc. A
geospatial tool integrated as a decision-making tool in the decision-making process
is of vital importance in India. The proposed spatial decision-support system can
bridge the gap between the traditional way of conducting EIA and the EIA using
geospatial techniques.
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to S. Devotta, The Director, National Environmental
Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, India for his encouragement and support.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 383
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
We sincerely acknowledge our colleagues, who had put efforts in working for
various projects and providing useful suggestions.
ReferencesARIMORO, A.O., FAGBEJA, M.A. and EEDY, W., 2002, The need and use of geographic
information systems for environmental impact assessment in Africa: with example
from ten years experience in Nigeria. JEAM/RAGEE, 4, pp. 16–27.
BOBROWSKY, P.T., 2002, Geo-environmental mapping: methods, theory and practice., 27, pp.
143–153 (The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger Publishing).
CARTALIS, C. and VAROTSOS, C., 1994, Surface ozone in Athens, Greece, at the beginning and
at the end of the 20th-century. Atmospheric Environment, 28, pp. 3–8.
EEDY, W., 1995, The use of GIS in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and
Project Appraisal (IAPA), 13, pp. 199–206.
EFSTATHIOU, M.N., VAROTSOS, C.A., SINGH, R.P., CRACKNELL, A.P. and TZANIS, C., 2003,
On the longitude dependence of total ozone trends over middle-latitudes. International
Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, pp. 1361–1367.
ERICKSON, P.A., 1994, A Practical Guide to Environmental Impact Assessment (New York:
Academic Press).
GONTIER, M., BALFORS, B. and MORTBERG, U., 2006, Biodiversity in environmental
assessment—current practice and tools for prediction. Environmental Impact
Assessment Review, 26, pp. 2006, 268–286.
GRIFFITH, C., 1980, Geographic Information Systems and environmental impact assessment.
Environmental Management, 4, pp. 21–25.
HASSAN, H., 1995, Implementing Geographic Information Systems in Environmental
Assessment. World Bank Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update No. 9.
HASSAN, H. and KJORVN, O., 1993, Geographic Information Systems for Environmental
Assessment and Review. World Bank Environmental Assessment Update No. 3.
HUTCHINSON, M.F., 1989, A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with
automatic removal of spurious pits. Journal of Hydrology, 106, pp. 211–232.
HUTCHINSON, M.F., 1988, Calculation of hydrologically sound digital elevation models. In
Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, International
Geographical Union, Columbus, pp. 117–133.
JACOVIDES, C.P., VAROTSOS, C., KALTSOUNIDES, N.A., PETRAKIS, M. and LALAS, D.P., 1994,
Atmospheric turbidity parameters in the highly polluted site of Athens basin.
Renewable Energy, 4, pp. 465–470.
JENSEN, J.R., 2000, Remote Sensing of the Environment, An Earth Resource Perspective,
Prentice-Hall Series in Geographic Information Science, Chapter 12, pp. 407–466
(Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).
JOAO, l., 2002, How scale affects environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact
Assessment Review, 22, pp. 289–310.
JOHNSTON, C.A., DETENBECK, N.E., BONDE, J.P. and NIEMI, G.J., 1988, Geographic
Information Systems for cumulative impact assessment. Photogrammetric Engineering
and Remote Sensing, 54, pp. 1609–1615 (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice
Hall).
KELLER, E.A., 1996, Landscape evaluation and land use. Environmental Geology, seventh
edition, 18, pp. 506–581.
KONDRATYEV, K.Y. and VAROTSOS, C.A., 2001a, Global tropospheric ozone dynamics, Part
I: Tropospheric ozone precursors—Part II: numerical modelling of tropospheric
ozone variability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 8, pp. 57–62.
KONDRATYEV, K.Y. and VAROTSOS, C.A., 2001b, Global tropospheric ozone dynamics—Part
II: numerical modelling of tropospheric ozone variability-Part I: tropospheric ozone
precursors [ESPR 8 (1) 57–62 (2001)]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,
8, pp. 113–119.
384 D. R. Satapathy et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
LAI, Y., MILLS, L.W. and CHENG, C., 2000, Implementation of a Geographic Information
System (GIS) to Determine Wildlife Habitat Quality Using Habitat Suitability Index
GIS Development Net, The Asian GIS Portal. In Proceedings of Asian Conference on
Remote Sensing, 4 – 8 December 2000, Taipei, Taiwan.
LI, A., WANG, A., LIANG, S. and ZHOU, W., 2006, Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation
in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS—a case study in the upper
reaches of Minjiang River, China. Ecological Modelling, 192, pp. 175–187.
LI, X., WANG, W., LI, F. and DENG, X., 1999, GIS based map overlay method for
comprehensive assessment of road environmental impact. Transportation Research,
D4, pp. 147–158.
LUNETTA, R.S. and ELVIDGE, C.D., 1999, Remote Sensing Change Detection; Environmental
Monitoring Methods and Applications (London: Taylor & Francis).
MUNN, R.E. (Ed.), 1975, Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Procedures,
SCOPE Report 5, (Toronto: John Wiley and Sons).
MUTHUSAMY, N. and RAMALINGAM, M., 2003, Environmental impact assessment for urban
planning and development using GIS. In Proceedings of the Third International
Conference on Environment and Health, 15–17 December 2003, Chennai, India.
NING, S., CHANG, N., JENG, K. and TSENG, Y., 2006, Soil erosion and non-point source
pollution impacts assessment with the aid of multi-temporal remote sensing images.
Journal of Environmental Management, 79, pp. 88–101.
PATIL, A.A., ANNACHHATREA, A.P. and TRIPATHI, N.K., 2002, Comparison of conventional
and geo-spatial EIA: a shrimp farming case study. Environmental Impact Assessment
Review, 22, pp. 361–375.
RAJITHA, K., MUKHERJEE, C.K. and VINU CHANDRAN, R., 2007, Review applications of
remote sensing and GIS for sustainable management of shrimp culture in India.
Aquacultural Engineering, 36, pp. 1–17.
RAMACHANDRA, T.V. and KUMAR, U., 2004, Geographic resources decision support system
for land use, land cover dynamics analysis. In Proceedings of the FOSS/GRASS User’s
Conference, 12–14 September, Bangkok.
RODDA, H.J.E., STROUD, M.J., SHANKAR, U. and THORROLD, B.S., 2001, A GIS based
approach to modelling the effects of land-use change on soil erosion in New Zealand.
Soil Use and Management, 17, pp. 30–40.
SAHIN, S. and KURUM, E., 2002, Erosion risk analysis by GIS in environmental impact
assessments: a case study-Seyhan Kopru Dam construction. Journal of Environmental
Management, 66, pp. 239–247.
SCHALLER, J., 1990, Geographical information system application in environmental impact
assessment. In Geographical Information System for Urban and Regional Planning, pp.
107–117 (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic).
SHALABY, A. and TATEISHI, R., 2007, Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring
land cover and land-use changes in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Applied
Geography, 27, pp. 28–41.
STAR, J.L., ESTES, J.E. and DAVIS, F., 1991, Improved integration of remote sensing and
Geographic Information System: a background to NCGIA initiative. Photogrammtric
Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57, pp. 643–645.
TRIMBLE, S.W., 1997, Contribution of stream channel erosion to sediment yield from an
urbanizing watershed. Science, 278, pp. 1442–1144.
VAROTSOS, C.A., ONDOV, J.M., CRACKNELL, A.P., EFSTATHIOU, M.N. and
ASSIMAKOPOULOS, M.N., 2006, Long-range persistence in global Aerosol Index
dynamics. International Journal Of Remote Sensing, 27, pp. 3593–3603.
VAROTSOS, C., ALEXANDRIS, D., CHRONOPOULOS, G. and TZANIS, C., 2001a, Aircraft
observations of the solar ultraviolet irradiance throughout the troposphere. Journal of
Geophysical Research—Atmospheres, 106, pp. 14843–14854.
VAROTSOS, C., KONDRATYEV, K.Y. and EFSTATHIOU, M., 2001b, On the seasonal variation of
the surface ozone in Athens, Greece. Atmospheric Environment, 35, pp. 315–320.
Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment 385
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
WEIERS, S., BOCK, M., WISSEN, M. and ROSSNER, G., 2004, Mapping and indicator
approaches for the assessment of habitats at different scales using remote sensing and
GIS methods. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67, pp. 43–65.
WORLD BANK, 1993, Geographic information systems for environmental assessment and
review. Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update No. 3.
WORLD BANK, 1993, The World Bank and Environmental Assessment: an Overview.
Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update, No. 1, April.
YILMA, A.D., 2004, Use of Geospatial Technologies for Environmental Protection in Ethiopia,
United Nations/European Space Agency/Sudan Remote Sensing Workshop On the Use
of Space Technology for Natural Resources Management Environmental Monitoring,
and Disaster Management, 4–8 April, 2004, Khartoum, Sudan.
386 Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alif
orni
a Sa
nta
Cru
z] a
t 15:
27 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014