appr teacher evaluation training

73
APPR Teacher Evaluation Training Robert Greenberg Regina Cohn December, 2012

Upload: audra-velez

Post on 31-Dec-2015

43 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

APPR Teacher Evaluation Training. Robert Greenberg Regina Cohn December, 2012. Working Agreement. Be present: minds and hands-on all day Respect time boundaries Recognize the need for quiet while working Use electronics respectfully and appropriately when prompted - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

APPRTeacher Evaluation Training

Robert Greenberg

Regina Cohn

December, 2012

Page 2: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Be present: minds and hands-on all day Respect time boundaries Recognize the need for quiet while

working Use electronics respectfully and

appropriately when prompted Return to large group attention when

signaled

2

Page 3: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Mission › Chapter 103 of the laws of 2010

Implementation › Connecting legal changes to practice and

learning Approach

› Collegial understanding of adapting regulations to good classroom practice

3

Page 4: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

4

Page 5: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

5

Page 6: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

6

Biblical scholar Hillel asked to give the essence of the Old Testament while standing on one foot.

Do not do unto others that which is hateful to you. All the rest is commentary. SED has adopted a deeper, richer curriculum, wants

teachers to use evidence (data) to assure it is learned, and administrators and supervisors to use evidence to assure that teachers are teaching it effectively.

All the rest is our legal obligation to incorporate this complexity into our daily administrative and supervisory practice!!!!!

Page 7: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

The Saber Tooth Curriculum› Table Talk

7

Page 8: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Brief overview of the CCLS in ELA and Mathematics

8

Page 9: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Measuring Text Complexity:Three Factors

Page 10: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Grade Band

Old Lexile Level

Lexile Aligned to the CCR

Expectations

K-1 N/A N/A

2-3 450-725 450-790

4-5 645-845 770-980

6-8 860-1010 955-1155

9-10 960-1115 1080-1305

11-CCR 1070-1220 1215-1355

10

Page 11: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

11

Page 12: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

1&2 Non-fiction TextsAuthentic Texts

3 Higher Level of Text ComplexityPaired Passages

4&5 Focus on command of evidence from text: rubrics and prompts

6 Academic Vocabulary

Common Core AssessmentsCommon Core Implications

12

Page 13: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

TABLE TALKQ – What does “starting” look like in your district?

Q – How can districts “find the time” to develop one CC aligned unit each semester?

Q – What is the best way to disseminate messages about the new teacher evaluation system?

engageNY – Commissioner King

13

Page 14: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Standard 10

Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.

Page 15: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

15

Page 16: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

16

Page 17: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

17

Page 18: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

18

11-12

•By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literature, history/social studies, science/technical texts in grades 11-CCR band proficiently with scaffolding at the high end of range•By the end of grade 12, read and comprehend literature, history/social studies, science/technical texts at the high end of grades 11-CCR band independently and proficiently

Page 19: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Grades

Literature Informational

K-2 50% 50%

3-5 50% 50%

6-12 30%-fiction-poetry-drama-Shakespeare

70%“substantially more literary non-fiction”-essays-speeches-opinion pieces-biographies-journalism-historical-scientific-contemporary events-nature-the arts-Founding Documents

19

Page 20: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Argument – persuasion› Defend with evidence from text› History/social studies – interpretation &

judgments with evidence from multiple sources

› Science – claims and conclusions that answer questions or address problems

› K-5 – opinion = argument

20

Page 21: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Informational/Explanatory› Information to provide data› Explanatory – clarification› Wide array of genres including academic

genres (scientific/historical reports/summaries)

Narrative › Experience – real, imaginary – to inform,

instruct, persuade, or entertain

21

Page 22: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Level Argue Explain/Inform Narrative

Elementary 30% 35% 35%

Middle School 35% 35% 30%

High School 40% 40% 20%

These forms are not independent. Informing and arguing rely on using information or evidence drawn from texts.

22

Page 23: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Changes in the CCLS for Mathematics

23

Page 24: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Shifts in Mathematics

1. Focus2. Coherence3. Fluency4. Deep Understanding5. Application6. Dual Intensity

1 Intense Focus

2 Linking Back

4, 5, 6 Mathematical Modeling

Common Core Assessments

Common Core Implications

24

Page 25: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Grade Required Fluency K Add/subtract fact families within 5 1 Add/subtract fact families within 10 2 Add/subtract within 201 Add/subtract within 100 (pencil and paper)3 Multiply/divide within 1002 Add/subtract within 1000 4 Add/subtract within 1,000,000 5 Multi-digit multiplication 6 Multi-digit division Multi-digit decimal operations 7 Solve px + q = r, p(x + q) = r 8 Solve simple 2.2 systems by inspection

25

Page 26: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Concept / Skill 2005 NYS Core Curriculum 2010 Common Core

Number Systems:Decimals - Comparing & Ordering

5.N.8 - Read, write, and order decimals to thousandths

5.N.10 - Compare decimals using <, >, or =

4.NF.6 - Use decimal notation for fractions with denominators 10 or 100. For example, rewrite 0.62 as 62/100; describe a length as 0.62 meters; locate 0.62 on a number line diagram.3

4.NF.7 - Compare two decimals to hundredths by reasoning about their size. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two decimals refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with the symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual model.3

5.NBT.3 - Read, write, and compare decimals to thousandths.

b. Compare two decimals to thousandths based on meanings of the digits in each place, using >, =, and < symbols to record the results of comparisons.

Number Systems:Percents - Meaning of

5.N.11 - Understand that percent means part of 100, and write percents as fractions and decimals

Not directly addressed

26

Page 27: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

27

Page 28: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:› What would you see?› What would you hear?› What would the students be doing or saying?

Individually, write one idea per post-it note.

28

Page 29: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Standard 7Professional Growth

New York State

TeachingStandards

29

Page 30: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Standard 1: Knowledge of Students & Student Learning• Knowledge of child development• Knowledge of research…• Knowledge of diverse learning needs• Knowledge of individual students• Knowledge of economic, social• Knowledge of technological literacy…

Standard 2: Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning• Knowledge of content…• Connect concepts across disciplines…• Uses a broad range of instructional strategies• Establishes goals & expectations• Designs instruction• Evaluate / utilize resources 30

Page 31: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Standard 3: Instructional Practice• Research-based practices• Communicates clearly…• High expectations…• Variety of instructional… to engage student• Engage students in multi-disciplinary skills• Monitor and assess progress

31

Page 32: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Standard 4: The Learning Environment• Creates a respectful, safe and supportive

environment• Creates an intellectually stimulating environment• Manages the learning environment• Organize and utilize available resources (e.g.

physical space, time, technology…)• Standard 5: Assessment for Student Learning

• Range of assessment tools• Understand, analyze, use data for differentiation*• Communicates assessment system*• Reflect upon assessment system and adjust*• Prepare students for assessments

* - assessed through “multiple measures”32

Page 33: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

• Standard 6: Professional Responsibilities• Upholds standards and policies• Collaborate with colleagues• Communicate & collaborate with families• Perform non-instructional duties• Complies with laws and polices

33

Page 34: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Standard 7: Professional Growth› Reflect on practice› Set goals for professional development› Communicate and collaborate to improve practice› Remain current in knowledge of content and pedagogy

34

Page 35: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

 

Table Talk: Using knowledge of the Teaching Standards, when you observe a lesson, what evidence do you see of learning?

Re-sort your table’s post-it notes as appropriate to the standard, element and indicator

35

Page 36: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

36

Page 37: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Pete the Cat

Page 38: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

1. Danielson's Framework for Teaching - ASCD Model

2. Danielson's Framework for Teaching - Teachscape

3. Marzano's Causal Teacher Evaluation Model4. NYSTCE Framework for the Observation of

Effective Teaching - Pearson5. NYSUT - Teacher Practice RubricApproved rubrics:http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/teachers-leaders/practicerubrics/home.html

38

Page 39: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

39

Page 40: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

The students should be working harder than the teacher.

4040

Page 41: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Level State Assessments

Local Measures 60% Other Measures

Ineffective Results are well-below State average for similar students (or district goals if no State test).

Results are well-below district or BOCES-adopted expectations for growth or achievement of student learning for grade/subject

Overall performance and results are well below standards.

Developing Results are below State average for similar students (or district goals if no State test).

Results are below district or BOCES-adopted expectations for growth or achievement of student learning standards for grade/subject.

Overall performance and results need improvement in order to meet standards.

41

Page 42: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Level State Assessments

Local Measures 60% Other Measures

Effective Results meet State average for similar students (or district goals if no State test).

Results meet district or BOCES-adopted expectations for growth or achievement of student learning for grade/subject

Overall performance and meet standards.

Highly Effective

Results are well-above State average for similar students (or district goals if no State test).

Results are well-above district or BOCES-adopted expectations for growth or achievement of student learning standards for grade/subject.

Overall performance and results exceeds expectations.

42

Page 43: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Ineffective– Teaching shows evidence of not understanding the concepts underlying the component - may represent practice that is harmful - requires intervention

Developing– Teaching shows evidence of knowledge and skills related to teaching - but inconsistent performance

Levels of Performance

43

Page 44: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Effective- Teaching shows evidence of thorough knowledge of all aspects of the profession. Students are engaged in learning. This is successful, accomplished, professional, and effective teaching.

Highly Effective– Classroom functions as a community of learners with student assumption of responsibility for learning.

Levels of Performance

44

Page 45: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Read the descriptors for Element III.4 of the NYSUT rubric or Domain 3C of the Danielson Framework.

Highlight the words / phrases that distinguish the differences among the levels of performance

45

Page 46: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Engagement in ActionVideo observation:• Observe what students are doing

that shows evidence of cognitive engagement, constructing meaning, or critical thinking.

• Collect evidence from the video, be prepared to share your evidence later.

4646

Page 47: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Observing and Evaluating Practice

The dos and don’ts…

4747

Page 48: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

What’s wrong with teacher evaluation? Why hasn’t it traditionally resulted in

professional growth? What conditions support professional

growth?

48

Page 49: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Fairness

Reliability

Validity

49

Page 50: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Six Best Practices 1) Annual Processes, 2) Clear, rigorous

expectations, 3) Multiple measures. 4) Multiple ratings, 5) Regular feedback, 6) Significance› From Teacher Evaluation 2.0

http://www.tntp.org/index.php/publications/issue-analysis/teacher-evaluation-2.0/

5050

Page 51: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Man on Fire – Data informs practice

Table Talk – What made Creasy’s analysis effective?

51

Page 52: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

52

Page 53: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Evidence is a factual reporting of events.

› It may include teacher and student actions and/or behaviors.

› It may also include artifacts prepared by the teacher, students, or others.

› It is not clouded with personal opinion or biases.

› It is selected using professional judgment by the observer and / or the teacher.

53

Page 54: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Verbatim scripting of teacher or student comments:

“Bring your white boards, markers and erasers to the carpet and sit on your square.”

Non-evaluative statements of observed teacher or student behavior:Teacher presented the content from the front of room.

Numeric information about time, student participation, resource use, etc.:

[9:14 – 9:29] Warm-up. 8 of 22 Ss finished at 9:20, sat still until 9:29

An observed aspect of the environment:Desks were arranged in groups of four with room to walk

between each group.

54

Page 55: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

• Actions, by teacher or students

• Statements or questions, by teacher or students

• Observable features of the classroom

• Review the evidence collected previously – is it evidence? Or opinion?

55

Page 56: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

• Today’s activities are an extension of the math unit.

• The pacing of the lesson was slow, allowing for student restlessness, disengagement, and disruptive behavior.

• The new table arrangement encourages concentration and controlled interaction with students.

• The teacher clearly has planned and organized for maximum effect.

• As the activity progressed students started calling out, “What should we do next?”

• The last activity discussed on the key scene was rushed.

• The teacher said the Civil War was a tragedy for the U.S. civilization.

56

Page 57: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Definition:

Attaching positive or negative meaning to elements in our environment based on personal or societal influences that shape our thinking.

A biased judgment is based on outside influences and is not necessarily related to a teacher’s effectiveness.

Example: “Mrs. T does so much for the school, she is an excellent

teacher.”

The actual classroom evidence may not support the rating of the teacher as “excellent.”

57

Page 58: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

• Imagine that you are the parent of a school age child. You are walking down the hall of your child’s school while classes are in session. The doors to several rooms are open and you have the opportunity to look in on teachers.

• What would cause you to think favorably about what you saw and what would cause you to think negatively? Write your response.

58

Page 59: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Assessor bias

Leniency

Central Tendency

“Halo” or “Horns” Effect

59

Page 60: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Reflection:As your reflect upon your individual and group responses to these activities, make your own personal list of biases to be aware of when you assess teaching performance.

Determine if the bias leads you to assign a higher or lower rating when evaluating teacher performance.

60

Page 61: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

61

Page 62: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

COLLECTDATA

(Evidence)

SORT TOALIGN

WITH YOURRUBRIC

Interpret:Clarify

Conclusions

Impact on learning…Support needed…

NO!

62

Page 63: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

• Script the lesson in your style• Hold conclusions• Beware of bias

63

Page 64: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

• Observe the video • Collect evidence of Standard 3

Instruction or use your district’s rubric:• With a partner, sort your evidence so

that it aligns with the appropriate criteria in your rubric for instruction

• Be prepared to share your evidence

64

Page 65: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

65

Page 66: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Use the self-check questions to review your evidence collectionHave I recorded only facts? Is my evidence relevant to the criteria being

examined?Whenever possible, have I quantified words such

as few, some, and most?Have I used quotation marks when quoting a

teacher or student?Does my selection or documentation of evidence

indicate any personal or professional preferences? 

Have I included any opinion (in the guise of fact)?

66

Page 67: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

With your partner, develop questions you have about the lesson you observed that must be answered before you rate the teacher’s performance?

Be prepared to share your questions

67

Page 68: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

“After 30 years of doing such work, I have concluded that classroom teaching … is perhaps the most complex, most challenging, and most demanding, subtle, nuanced, and frightening activity that our species has ever invented. ..The only time a physician could possibly encounter a situation of comparable complexity would be in the emergency room of a hospital during or after a natural disaster.”

Lee Shulman, The Wisdom of Practice

68

Page 69: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Professional learning never ends. It is every teacher’s responsibility to

engage in professional development. Teaching is so complex that it is never

done perfectly. Every educator can always become more

skilled. Making a commitment to do so is part of the essential work of teaching.

Charlotte DanielsonThe Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice

69

Page 70: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Infuse a school’s practices related to professional development;

Be reflected in the school’s practices surrounding mentoring and teacher evaluation; and

Regard mentoring and evaluation as ongoing learning.

Charlotte DanielsonThe Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice

70

Page 71: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

“Teacher evaluation can be an opportunity for genuine professional learning. When organized around clearly established and accepted standards of practice, teacher evaluation offers an opportunity for educators to reflect seriously on their practice, and promote learning.”

Charlotte DanielsonThe Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice

71

Page 72: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

• Discuss the content of the previous four slides with your colleagues.

• How do you create a culture of professional inquiry in the current climate of teacher accountability?

• In what ways does the type of questions observers ask of teachers promote – or inhibit – such a climate?

• Be prepared to share your discussion.

72

Page 73: APPR Teacher Evaluation Training

Thoughts, Comments, Questions

Thank you for your participation!

73