approved by - portland, oregon

26

Upload: others

Post on 17-Apr-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 2: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 3: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

Sold To: Shipped To:

Quantity:

Color:

Finish: Date:

Approved By:

Note: Finised Product Dimensions May Vary +/- 1/8” From Drawing

60” x 36” Left Trench Drain Shower Pan

36” +/- 1/8”

60” +/- 1/8”

32”

4”

3 1/4”

3 Integral Flanges

6"

Top View

Side View With Slope

4 1/2”

Drain Cover3 1/4”

4 1/4”

Drain Detail

31 1/2”

17”

Page 4: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

Report Number: 2078-15002-003 Project No.: 24477-004 Report Issued: April 14, 2015 Client: MPL Corporation Contact: Jennifer Heath 203 N. Edgerton Fairland, IN 46126 Source of Samples: The samples were shipped to IAPMO R&T Lab from MPL Corporation and

received in good condition on February 6, 2015, March 9, 2015, March 16, 2015, and March 25, 2015.

Date of Testing: February 6, 2015 through April 2, 2015 Sample Description: Plastic Shower Pans

Models: See page 2

Please refer to the drawings and photo for detail. Scope of Testing: The purpose of the testing was to determine if the samples of the plastic shower

pans met the applicable requirements of CSA B45.5-11/IAPMO Z124-2011 entitled, “Plastic Plumbing Fixtures” with Update No. 1, May 2012.

CONCLUSION: The sample tested of the plastic shower pan models listed on page 2 from

MPL Corporation, COMPLIED with the applicable requirements of CSA B45.5-11/IAPMO Z124-2011 with Update No. 1, May 2012.

By our signatures below we certify that all the testing and sample preparation for this report was performed under continuous, direct supervision of IAPMO R&T Lab, unless otherwise stated. Tested By, Reviewed by,

_______________________________ _____________________________________ Lawrence S. Owens, Test Technician Jeffrey Yu, MSEM, Manager - Fixture Testing

Page 1 of 11

Page 5: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

Models:

Model Description Dimensions

1 TRP-3838 Square base w/center drain and factory attached PVC flange 38” x 38” x 3-1/4”

2 **RISHP-3662 Rectangle base w/center drain and factory attached PVC flange 36” x 62” x 3-1/4”

3 *60" x 36" Left Corner Shower Pan Rectangle base w/right side drain and integral flange 59-3/4" x 35-7/8" x 5"

4 60" x 36" Right Corner Shower Pan Rectangle base w/left side drain and integral flange 59-3/4" x 35-7/8" x 5"

*Tested Model **Evaluated for ADA only. Primary Standard: CSA B45.5-11/IAPMO Z124-2011. Sections Tested / Evaluated:

4.1 General* 4.2 Waste Fitting Openings, Drainage and Overflows 4.4 Bathtubs and Shower Bases 5 Test Requirements 5.3 Warpage Tolerance Test 5.4 Surface Examination Test 5.5 Subsurface Test 5.6 Waste Fitting Connection Test 5.7 Point Impact Test 5.8 Structural Integrity Test 5.9 Radii Load Test for Water Closets, Urinals, Bathtubs, and Showers 5.10 Colourfastness Test 5.11 Stain Resistance Test 5.12 Cleanability and Wear Test 5.13 Ignitability Test 5.14 Cigarette Test 5.15 Chemical Resistance test 5.16 Thermal Shock Resistance Test 5.17 Water Resistance Test for Bathtubs and Showers 6 Markings 6.1 General 6.4 Packaging *Section 4.1.5 of CSA B45.5/IAPMO Z124-2011 refers to the applicable requirements of ICC A117.1-2009.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 2 of 11

Page 6: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

Secondary Standards: ICC A117.1-2009. 608 Shower Compartments ASTM F 462-79 (R2007) 5.6 Characteristics of the Slip-Resistant Surface 8.6 Recording of Test Data

Notes: 1. Sections not specifically listed above were considered not applicable to the subject product. 2. The final compliant to the applicable requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 is dependent upon the final

installation. Test Results: All tests and evaluations were conducted per the written procedures as specified in the standards. CSA B45.5-11/IAPMO Z124-2011

4.1 General

4.1.2 Surface Finish – COMPLIED The fixture surfaces were free from defects to the extent specified in the standard when evaluated

per clause 5.4. Refer to section 5.4 of this report.

4.1.3 Coated Parts – NOT APPLICABLE

Coated parts other than those covered in Clause 4.3.1.2 shall comply with the applicable requirements of ASME A112.18.1/CSA B45.1.

Findings: The shower pan did not contain any coated parts.

4.1.4 Different Materials – NOT APPLICABLE Fixtures made of a combination of plastic and other materials shall comply with the applicable requirements of ASME A112.19.1/CSA B45.2, ASME A112.19.2/CSA B45.1, or ASME A112.19.3/CSA B45.4. Findings: The shower pan was made of plastic only.

4.1.5 Accessible Design Fixtures – COMPLIED

Fixtures designed to be accessible shall comply with the dimensional requirements specified in CAN/CSA-B651 or ICC/ANSI A117.1. Findings: Refer to ICC A117.1 sections of this report.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 3 of 11

Page 7: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

4.2 Waste Fitting Openings, Drainage and Overflows 4.2.1 Openings and Drainage 4.2.1.1 COMPLIED.

The fixture: (a) Had a waste fitting outlet the center of which was located at the lowest point of the fixture. (b) Drained to the waste outlet

4.2.1.2 REFERENCE ONLY

Except when proprietary (i.e. non-standard) waste fittings are provided by the manufacturer, the dimensions of the waste outlet shall be as shown in Figure 1. Findings:

Required Outlet Dimension (in)

Observed Outlet Dimension (in)

Reference Only 3.37 4.2.1.3 NOT APPLICABLE

Factory-supplied waste fittings shall comply with ASME A112.18.2/CSA B125.2. Findings: The shower pan was not provided with a waste fitting.

4.4 Bathtubs and Shower Bases 4.4.1 Flanges – COMPLIED

Shower bases intended for installation against a wall shall incorporate a continuously raised flange at least 1.0 in above the threshold as shown in Figure 8. The flange shall be (a) integral with the bathtub or shower base; (b) added to an island tub or shower base in the factory; or (c) field-installed using a flange kit that complies with Clause 5.18 and includes all necessary parts and fasteners. Bathtubs and shower bases using field-installed flanges shall be marked in accordance with Clause 6.3. In addition, the bottom of any hole in the flange or corner treatment shall be not less than 0.3 in above the rim. Findings: The shower pan had an integral 1” continuously raised flange.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 4 of 11

Page 8: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

4.4.2 Slope to the Waste Outlet – COMPLIED

Bathtubs and shower bases shall have a maximum slope of 4% to the waste outlet. Findings: The shower pan had a maximum slope of 2.44% and a minimum slope of 1.05% to the waste outlet.

4.4.4 Shower Base Thresholds – COMPLIED

Except for accessible designs, when provided, shower base threshold shall be at least 2 in. above the top of the waste outlet, as shown in Figure 8.

Findings: The shower pan provided a threshold that was 4.25 in. above the waste fitting.

5 Test Requirements 5.3 Warpage Tolerance Test – COMPLIED

When tested in accordance with clause 5.3.1, the warpage at the edges of the fixture that set against a wall or floor, or into cabinets, or countertops shall not exceed 0.06 in/ft; warpage at all other edges of the fixture shall not exceed 0.09 in/ft; total warpage of any linear dimension shall not exceed 0.63 in.

Findings: The feeler gauge with a thickness equal to the total warpage allowed in Clause 5.3.2 did not slide under the specimens tested. Warpage at the edges of the fixture that set against a wall or floor, or into cabinets, or countertops did not exceed 0.06 in/ft. Warpage at all other edges of the fixture did not exceed 0.09 in/ft. Total warpage of any linear dimension did not exceed 0.63 in.

5.4 Surface Examination Test – COMPLIED

When evaluated in accordance with Clause 5.4.1, the unit was free from cracks, chipped areas and blisters. There were no other defects that exceeded those allowed by Table 1.

5.5 Subsurface Test – COMPLIED

When evaluated in accordance with Clause 5.5.1, no voids larger than 0.063 in and no more than eight voids less than 0.063 in were found.

5.6 Waste Fitting Connection Test – COMPLIED

The waste fitting connection was tested in accordance with Clause 5.6.1 using a 50 lbf load with a 24 in. lever arm connected as shown in Figure 9. The load was applied at three locations, one minute per location with two locations at approximately180° apart. Findings: When examined in accordance with items (b) to (d) of Clause 5.4.1, there were no visible cracks in the bottom surface of the specimen.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 5 of 11

Page 9: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

5.7 Point Impact Load Test – COMPLIED

When tested in accordance with Clause 5.7.1.2, a 1-1/2 inch diameter, 1/2 pound steel ball was dropped three times from a height of 36 inches to strike at three different points on flat areas on the specimen and at three different locations on the rim or threshold. The 1-1/2 inch diameter 1/2 pound ball was also dropped from 24 inches to strike 3 different points on the radii in the bottom of the specimen with at least one strike in a corner.

Findings: There were no cracks or chips on the surface of the specimen when examined in accordance with items (b) to (d) of clause 5.4.1.

5.8 Structural Integrity Test 5.8.2 Load Test for Bathtub Rims and Bottoms and Shower Thresholds and Bottoms – COMPLIED

When tested to clauses 5.8.2.2.1 and 5.8.2.2.3 with 300 lbf load, there shall be no damage to the fixture. The deflection under load shall be less than 0.150” maximum and the residual deflection shall be less than 0.008”. Findings: There was no cracks in the surface of the specimen when examined in accordance with items (b) to (d) of clause 5.4.1.

Load Area Load Deflection (in) Residual Deflection (in) Required Observed Required Observed

Bottom 0.150 max 0.008 0.008 max 0.000 5.9 Radii Load Test for Water Closets, Urinals, Bathtubs, and Showers – COMPLIED

The outside radii of finished surfaces were tested with a 0.5 in. diameter nylon rod with 10 lbf of applied load at an angle tangent to the radius. Findings: The unit tested showed no signs of cracks when examined in accordance with items (b) to (d) of clause 5.4.1.

5.10 Colourfastness Test – COMPLIED

When tested in accordance with Clause 5.10.1, 5.10.2, and 5.10.3, two pieces taken from manufacturer provided coupons which were prepared with the same materials and in the same manner as the fixture itself were selected as test specimens. One specimen (the test piece) of the material was tested for 200 hours in accordance with ASTM D2565 with a back panel temperature maintained at 145 ± 9 ˚F. The other specimen (the control piece) was stored away from any light source at a temperature of 23 ± 5° C (73 ± 9° F). After the completion of the test, the specimen shall show no significant change in color when compared with the control specimen. The average color difference between the test and control pieces shall be no more than ± 2 Delta E units.

Findings: The average color difference between tested piece and control piece was 0.45 Delta E units.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 6 of 11

Page 10: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

5.11 Stain Resistance Test – COMPLIED When tested in accordance with Clause 5.11.1, a manufacturer provided coupon which was prepared with the same materials and in the same manner as the fixture itself was conditioned by wet-rubbing a scouring compound and cheesecloth for 20 scrub cycles. Two drops of each reagent were applied to the test specimens. One drop of each reagent was covered with a small watch glass and the other left uncovered. The specimens were allowed to remain for sixteen hours at a temperature of 74.3 ± 3.6º F in a room with a relative humidity of 50 ± 5 %. At the end of the test, the excess reagents were removed by blotting with a paper towel. The specimens were then subjected to cleansing tests and rated in accordance with the procedures given in 5.11.2. Requirement: The maximum stain resistance rating shall be the sum of all individual stain ratings, for each of the covered and uncovered stain areas. The maximum stain resistance rating shall be 50 except for sinks, where it shall not exceed 64. The maximum allowable thickness of material removed to eliminate the stain shall be 0.005 inch. Findings: The total rating was 34 points. In addition, no material loss was observed. Reagents Covered

Samples Uncovered Samples

Black Crayon 2 2 Black Liquid Shoe Polish 1 1 Blue Washable Ink 3 3 Lipstick 1 1 Hair Dye 3 3 Iodine Solution (1% alcohol solution) 4 4 Gentain Violet (2% aqueous solution) 3 3 Total 17 17

5.12 Cleanability and Wear Test – COMPLIED

Three specimens cut from manufacturer provided coupons which were prepared with the same materials and in the same manner as the fixture itself were subjected to 7,600 scrubing cycles of abrasive slurry with a flow rate of 3.5 mL per minute and a scrub cycle rate of 60 cycles per minute. Brushes were switched at 25%, 50%, and 75% of the full term accordance with Table 3 to ensure feedholes are not obstructed and excess slurry was washed from the specimen tray. On completion of the total cycles, the three samples were removed, rinsed in tap water, dried and measured for cleanability using the procedures outlined in 5.12.2 and for reduction in surface material. Each specimen shall withstand the number of scrub cycles specified in Table 2 without wear-through of the surface material in the middle third of the specimen surface when tested in accordance with clause 5.12.1. Each specimen shall not lose more than 5% white-light reflectance after being cleaned with liquid cleanser and not more than 2% white-light reflectance after an additional cleaning with abrasive cleaner. Findings: The surface material was not worn-through. The average absolute percentage loss of white-light reflectance was greater than 2%. Thus, the specimens were given an additional rubbing with a clean, dampened chamois and the abrasive slurry specified in Clause 5.12.1.2.2 for approximately 50 cycles, rinsed in warm water, and allowed to dry. The white-light reflectance was determined again and measured to be 0.03%, 0.22%, 0.68% for samples 1, 2 , 3, respectively.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 7 of 11

Page 11: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

5.13 Ignitability Test – NOT APPLICABLE

The ignitability test shall (a) be conducted only on the unexposed service walls of bathtubs and shower stalls (see Figure 17); not apply to fixtures intended for use in RVs; and (c) not apply around shower and bathub waste openings.

Findings: The shower pans were not provide with service walls.

5.14 Cigarette Test – COMPLIED

Specimens were cut from manufacturer provided coupons which were prepared with the same materials and in the same manner as the fixture itself were subjected to three lit cigarettes of popular brands. The cigarettes were placed on the test specimen, 25mm (1 in) from the edge and allowed to burn for a duration of 2 minutes ±2 seconds. Findings: The specimens showed no signs of progressive glow during or after contact with the lit cigarettes. The resulting damage did not impair the serviceability of the unit and was easily repairable by using abrasive and polishing compounds to approximate the original finish.

5.15 Chemical Resistance Test – COMPLIED

When tested per Clause 5.15.1 and 5.15.2, two drops each of Naphtha, Ethyl Alcohol, Amyl Acetate, 1% Ammonium hydroxide, Citric Acid, Urea, Hydrogen Peroxide, Sodium Hypochlorite, Toluene, Ethyl Acetate, Lye, and Acetone were applied to a manufacturer provided coupon which was prepared with the same materials and in the same manner as the fixture itself. One set of the reagents was covered with a small watch glass and one set remained uncovered for a total of 16 hours. At the end of the 16 hours the watch glass and excess reagents were removed and the sample held for 24 hours at a temperature of 74.3 ±3.6 ˚F and a relative humidity of 50 ±5%. Findings: When examined per Clause 5.4.1 (d), the surfaces of the specimens were unaffected by the reagents, except for superficial surface changes which were removeable by sanding with 400 grit sandpaper and water. The resulting damage did not impair the serviceability of the unit and was easily repairable by using abrasive and polishing compounds to approximate the original finish.

5.16 Thermal Shock Resistance Test – COMPLIED

A complete fixture was set up on a test stand. Using a faucet or pipe equipped with an aerator, water was set at 1 ± 0.2 gpm, placed at 1 to 1-1/2 inches from the edge of the drain, hot water at 150 ± 4 ºF for 1.5 minutes, allowed to drain for 30 seconds, and immediately followed by cold water at 50 ± 4 ºF for 1.5 minutes, and allowed to drain for 30 seconds. This shall constitute one cycle. Testing continued for 250 cycles.

Findings: After testing for 250 cycles, there were no signs of cracking, crazing, blistering or spalling or delamination when examined per Clause 5.4.1 (d).

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 8 of 11

Page 12: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

5.17 Water Resistance Test for Bathtubs and Showers ‒ COMPLIED

Three specimens were cut from manufacturer provided coupons which were prepared with the same materials and in the same manner as the fixture itself and subjected to distilled water maintained at 150º F ± 2º F for 100 hours in accordance with Clause 5.17.2. Findings: There were no visible cracking, crazing, blistering or spalling, delamination, or permanent colour change when examined in accordance with Clause 5.4.1 (d).

6 Marking 6.1 General – COMPLIED

Plastic plumbing fixtures shall be marked with the manufacturer’s name or registered trademark or in the case of private labeling, the name of the customer for whom the fixture was manufactured. Additional markings shall be in accordance with Clauses 6.3 and 6.4, as applicable. Markings shall be permanent, legible, and visible after installation.

Findings: The shower pan was marked with the manufacturer’s name, “MPL Corporation” using a UL 969 compliant label per the drawing.

6.4 Packaging – NO TESTING CONDUCTED

Packaging for plastic plumbing fixtures shall be marked with the following:

(a) manufacturer’s name or registered trademark or, in the case of private labeling, the name of the customer for whom the fixture was manufactured,

(b) model number

Findings: The final packaging was not provided for evaluation.

ICC A117.1-2009 608 Shower Compartments 608.2.1 Transfer-Type Shower Compartments 608.2.1.1 Size – COMPLIED

Transfer-type shower compartments shall have a clear inside dimension of 36 inches minimum width and 36 inches minimum in depth, measured at the center point of opposing sides. An entry of 36 inches minimum width shall be provided.

Findings: The shower pan size was 38” x 38”. The entry width was 38" (Model TRP-3838 ONLY).

608.2.1.2 Clearance – NO EVALUATION

A clearance of 48 inches minimum in length measured perpendicular from the control wall, and 36 inches minimum in depth shall be provided adjacent to the open face of the compartment. Findings: Only the shower receptors were provided. The clearance area is dependent upon the final installation.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 9 of 11

Page 13: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

608.2.1.3 Seat – NO EVALUATION

A folding or non-folding seat complying with Section 610 shall be provided on the wall opposite the control wall. Findings: Only the shower receptors were provided. Final compliance to this standard is dependent upon the final installation.

608.2.2 Standard Roll-In Type Shower Compartments 608.2.2.1 Size – COMPLIED

Standard roll-in-type shower compartments shall have a clear inside dimension of 60 inches minimum width and 30 inches minimum in depth, measured at the center point of opposing sides. An entry 60 inches minimum width shall be provided. Findings: The roll-in-type shower pan was 62” x 36”. The entry width was at least 62” (Model RISHP-3662 only).

608.2.2.2 Clearance – NO EVALUATION

A clearance of 60 inches minimum in length adjacent to the 60 inch width of the open face of the shower compartment, and 30 inches minimum in depth shall be provided. Findings: Only the shower pan was provided. The clearance area adjacent to the 60 inch width of the open face is dependent upon the final installation.

608.2.2.3 Seat – NO EVALUATION

A folding seat complying with Section 610 shall be provided on an end wall. Findings: Only the shower receptors were provided. Final compliance to this standard is dependent upon the final installation.

608.6 Thresholds – COMPLIED

Thresholds in roll-in-type shower compartments shall be 1/2 inch maximum in height in accordance with Section 303. In transfer-type shower compartments, thresholds 1/2 inch maximum in height shall be beveled, rounded, or vertical.

Finding: The shower pan model TRP-3838 was a transfer-type unit with no threshold. The shower pan model RISHP-3662 was a roll-in type unit with no threshold.

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 10 of 11

Page 14: Approved By - Portland, Oregon

ASTM F 462-79 (R2007) 5.6 Characteristics of the Slip-Resistant Surface – COMPLIED

The slip-resistant surfaces of the shower base covered the entire the bathing surface area to the extent of 1 inch to the radii.

8.6 Recording of Test Data – COMPLIED Findings: The slip resistance rating was more than the minimum requirement of 0.04.

Location 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Slip Resistance Measured

(Static Coefficient of Friction) 0.150 0.214 0.319 0.220 0.219 0.319 0.141 0.194 0.260

Photographs of the Sample Tested:

Model 60" x 36" Left Corner Shower Pan

Model RISHP-3662

Report No. 2078-15002-003 Page 11 of 11

Page 15: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 16: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 17: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 18: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 19: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 20: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 21: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 22: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 23: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 24: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 25: Approved By - Portland, Oregon
Page 26: Approved By - Portland, Oregon