Copyright © Marlyn Bennett, Corbin Shangreaux, 2005 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation desservices d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politiqued’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/

Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit.Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé del’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec àMontréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche.https://www.erudit.org/fr/

Document généré le 5 mai 2022 02:06

First Peoples Child & Family ReviewA Journal on Innovation and Best Practices in Aboriginal Child Welfare Administration,Research, Policy & Practice

Appyling Maslow's Hierarchy TheoryMarlyn Bennett et Corbin Shangreaux

Volume 2, numéro 1, 2005

URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1069540arDOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1069540ar

Aller au sommaire du numéro

Éditeur(s)First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada

ISSN1708-489X (imprimé)2293-6610 (numérique)

Découvrir la revue

Citer cet articleBennett, M. & Shangreaux, C. (2005). Appyling Maslow's Hierarchy Theory.First Peoples Child & Family Review, 2(1), 89–116.https://doi.org/10.7202/1069540ar

Résumé de l'articleThis paper evolved from the outcome of a feedback meeting held between theprinciple researchers of Cycle II of the Canadian Incidence Study of ReportedChild Abuse and Neglect (CIS), the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) anda number of representatives of the First Nations Child and Family ServiceAgencies (FNCFS Agencies) which participated in Cycle II of the CIS (CIS-2003)and numerous Research Assistants tasked with collecting information from theFNCFS Agencies. The authors present a profile of the historical andcontemporary experience of Aboriginal children and families who come intocontact with the child welfare system and include a discussion on some of thefindings from two analyses that have been conducted on the data from the1998 Canadian Incident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-1998).An overview of the challenges as well as the positive aspects of the study fromthe perspectives of the FNCFS Agencies and the Research Assistances isincluded along with an examination as to why research may not figureprominently among the service priorities of FNCFS Agencies. The strengths ofchallenges of participating in CIS-2003 provide rich insight into theperspectives of the Research Assistants and FNCFS Agencies who participatedin this national study. The paper concludes with recommendations by theFNCFS Agencies and the Research Assistants on how to improve the datacollection process with FNCFS Agencies for future Cycles of the CanadianIncident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect.