apr workshop 2010-participatory monitoring & evaluation-susan perez
TRANSCRIPT
Annual Performance Review and South-South Cooperation Event
1-6 November 2010Nanning, China
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Outline
• Review of the PM&E definition• Why the need for PM&E• Participation within the PM&E• PM&E experience in WMCIP & NMCIREMP - why - how - what (concepts, tools & applications, benefits, learning, success factors, challenges) - who• Policy recommendation to IFAD
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
What is PM&E? PM&E is a process where stakeholders at various
levels (i.e., local people, policy makers, development agencies, implementing government ministries) undertake monitoring (measuring, recording, collecting information) and evaluation (analyzing and communicating information) of a particular project, program or policy, distribute control over the content (objectives, indicators), the process (methods, timing, workload, evaluation design) and the results (positive and negative changes, issues) of M and E, and collaborative in pinpointing and acting on corrective actions. (Oakley, 1988; World Bank 2008; Jackson and Kassam, p.3)
Why the need for PM&E…
Recent developments impacting M&E
• Macro level
(a) International initiatives (i.e.,Millennium Development Goals [MDGs], Highly Indebted Poor Country [HIPC] Initiative, World Trade Organization [WTO] membership, the National Poverty Reduction Strategy Approach); and,
(b) internal schemes (i.e., decentralization, deregulation, bureaucratic downsizing) in public sector management
These occurrences have pushed to the forefront a critical developmental question:
Are desired results and outcomes in the sector and national levels being achieved by policies, programs, and projects implemented by governments? Because of these the need for a development paradigm evolved that accentuated results, partnership (government, private sector, and civil society), coordination, accountability, ownership, sustainability).
The need for “M&E of outcomes” at the national and global levels led to the birth of Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation (RBME), which builds on conventional M&E’s assessment of implementation quality of inputs and outputs (the “what, why and how”) by adding a greater focus on outcomes and impacts (the “so what”) for a country.
• Micro level of Projects - RBME included elements that could help address the lack of real local participation in M&E:
i) added emphasis on stakeholder perceptions of change
ii) more qualitative progress information on outcomes
iii) collaboration with strategic partners, and
iv) assessment of partnership success
Who wants to know what has changed?
• Government• Funding institutions/donors• Non-Government Organizations• Community institutions/beneficiaries• Private organizations• Civil society• Others
Governments, FIs,
local people
Project Identification
and Preparation
Completion and
“End-Evaluation”Appraisal and Approval
Becomes part of design and budget:capacity dev’t, intentional activities for local people
ImplementationProject management follow
through: mentoring, counterparting
PM&E Cycle
Decide who participates
Take action
Share results (RQ 2)
Analyze results Gather information
Develop forms and
indicators
Establish goals
Co-decision makerCo-developer
Co-analyst Co-collector
Participation
Participation within the PM&E Cycle
Why “community” PM&E was implemented
• Recommendation of the IFAD Supervision Mission (WMCIP)
• Participatory M&E included in the project design (NMCIREMP)
• M & E manual
How was it implemented
• Engaged NGOs• Conduct capability building training with local partners
(i.e., barangay LGUs, IP leaders)• Pilot test (i.e., WMCIP)
PM&E Cycle at Community Level
Evaluation
Completion
Implementation
Monitoring
Re-planning/Adjustments
Feedback & lessons learned
•Co-developer
•Co-collector
•Co-analyst
•Co-decision maker
NMCIREMP/WMCIP PM&E Concepts and Processes
Beneficiaries and local stakeholders participates in:• selection of indicators to be monitored• conduct monitoring on sub-projects/activities
implemented in their area• collect and analyze data/information gathered• Adjust/redesign implementation scheme• Submit findings/results to regular Project structures to
form part of the regular M & E system at the Project level
Who were involved?
• Self-help group members• Community institutions members• Barangay/LGU officials• Project Implementing Team Members• NGO staff• Local Community Volunteers• Other community members
PM&E tools and its applications
• SIHAGA (Self Help Group Assessment) – evaluation of SHG maturity performance
• OMA (Organizational Maturity Assessment) – evaluation of CI maturity
• FS and DED (Feasibility Studies and Detailed Engineering Designs) – measurement of construction progress and quality control
• Simple Business Plans – monitoring & evaluation of sales and marketing efficiency
• NGOs Performance Evaluation/Assessment – assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the NGOs in terms of providing the expected services/assistance to the beneficiaries
What are the PM&E benefits?
• Enhanced project beneficiaries’ capacity to implement, monitor, & evaluate local development initiatives;
• Enhanced feed backing mechanisms and systems at the community level;
• Learn from experiences and replicate best practices• Enhanced effectiveness and efficiency (ensuring inputs are on
time and at cost) in sub-project implementation at the community level because monitoring, analysis of data, and feed backing are being done in less time needed and undertaken by the beneficiaries and stakeholders themselves.
• Consolidate feedback from the beneficiaries on the quality, quantity of services and interventions provided
• Sustainability monitoring (ensuring O & M compliance) for completed community rural infrastructure projects
Learning…
• PM&E can be developed and used with community participations as long as its design fits with the information needs of the community.
• Increases ownership of the project, a sense of accountability of the project results the communities, and could improve overall project activities and outcomes
• Need for continuous capacity building – requires understanding of the tools but an overall understanding of community dynamics; needs regular capacity building training; fields exposures, on-the-job training
• Community leaders are more effective facilitators • PM&E allows for better results, gives continuity and sustainability
to projects beyond project life because the beneficiaries participated in designing the system based on criteria they have chosen rather than imposed indicators
Contributing success factors
• Operates/mainstreamed within the existing structure of DAR
• Operates within the context of a multi-level MES (project, program, sector (AR/RD) levels)
• Operates in a continuum (from project design to post-project completion
• Support funds from IFAD and ENRAP-IDRC
Challenges…
• not all those who were trained became facilitators (e.g., lack the skill)
• attendance in PM&E related activities• needs time• some tools are not applicable for those who cannot read
and write
Policy recommendations to IFAD
• The participatory M&E system should form part of the design of regular M&E systems of development projects funded by IFAD and other donors/funding institutions
• Sufficient funds should be allocated to PM&E to allow flexibility to attain the desired result. The project funds estimated for M& E were insufficient. Funds for other M&E activities were sourced from grants (IFAD, ENRAP-IDRC)
Maraming salamat po!