april 2015 the economic impact of tourism in wisconsin

40
April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

Upload: delilah-watkins

Post on 16-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

April 2015

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

Page 2: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

State Overview

Page 3: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

3

Headline results

The Wisconsin visitor economy strengthened in 2014 with a 5.3% increase in visitor spending. This follows a 4.5% gain in 2013.

■ Visitor spending tallied $11.4 billion in 2014.

■ Wisconsin visitor volumes reached 102.4 million in 2014.

■ With improvements in the overall economy and moderating gas prices, both day and overnight visitor volumes grew around 2%.

■ Per trip spending increased as personal income and consumer confidence strengthened in 2014.

■ Visitor spending growth was led by spending on recreational activities along with lodging.

Page 4: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

4

Headline results

Visitor spending of $11.4 billion generated $18.5 billion in total business sales in 2014 as traveler dollars flowed through the Wisconsin economy.

Visitor activity sustained 187,650 jobs in 2014, both directly and indirectly.

These jobs represent 7.9% of total employment in Wisconsin; 1 in every 12.7 jobs in the state is sustained by tourism

activity.

Including indirect and induced impacts, tourism in Wisconsin generated $1.4 billion in state and local taxes and $1.05 billion in Federal taxes last year.

In the absence of the state and local taxes generated by tourism, each Wisconsin household would need to pay $620 to maintain the current level of government services.

Page 5: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

5

Industry indicator summary

Visits to Wisconsin destinations grew 2.0% between 2013 and 2014.

Lodging metrics strengthened in 2014, posting their strongest numbers since 2011.

State sales tax revenue on lodging properties grew 6.9% in 2014 (source: State Revenue Office).

Tourism-related employment grew on par with overall state employment growth, increasing 1.1% from the prior year.

Page 6: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

6

Lodging industry

The hotel sector expanded robustly in 2014, with room demand growing 3.5%.

The occupancy rate increased from 55.1% in 2013 to 56.8% in 2014.

Tighter occupancy boosted average room rates 3.7%.

Rising demand and higher prices generated growth in room revenues of 7.4%.

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

2011 2012 2013 2014

Demand

Revenue

ADR

Lodging metrics reflect a strong 2014

Source: Tourism Economics

% change

All lodging metrics posted their best results since the post-recession spike.

Page 7: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

7

Sales taxes

Sales tax collections in tourism-related industries were robust in 2014 with the exception of retail sales.

Strength in 2014 is evident across several visitor spending categories with lodging and F&B at 5-year highs.

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Lodging F&B Recreation Retail

Taxable sales in tourism-related industries

Source: WI Dept. of Revenue

% change

Page 8: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

Visitor Spending

Page 9: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

9

Overview

Wisconsin visitor volumes reached 102.4 million in 2014. Visitors spent a total of $11.4 billion.

Visits grew 2.0% while spending increased 5.3% in 2014. 88

90

92

94

96

98

100

102

104

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Visitor Spending, bls (L) Person-Stays, mls (R)

$

Wisconsin Visits and SpendingUS$ Billions

Sources: Longwoods International, OTTI, Stats Can, Tourism Economics

Millions

Page 10: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

10

Visitor spending

Wisconsin visitor spending reached $11.4 billion in 2014, posting 5.3% growth.

Recreational spending surged, followed by lodging and spending on food & beverages.

$9.2$9.9

$10.4$10.8

$11.4

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$ B

illi

on

s

Spending (L) % Change (R)

$

Tourism Industry Sales & Growth RateUS$ Billions

Sources: Longwoods International, OTTI, Stats Can, Tourism Economics

Sector 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 % ChangeLodging $1,685 $1,840 $1,995 $2,087 $2,182 $2,339 7.2%

Other Transport $834 $958 $1,057 $1,195 $1,244 $1,285 3.3%

Air $384 $388 $405 $408 $407 $421 3.6%

Food & bev. $2,146 $2,252 $2,447 $2,569 $2,729 $2,905 6.4%

Retail $1,850 $2,066 $2,200 $2,222 $2,272 $2,328 2.4%

Recreation $1,162 $1,155 $1,225 $1,311 $1,393 $1,502 7.8%

2nd home rental $462 $540 $569 $584 $613 $638 4.2%

TOTAL $8,522 $9,199 $9,899 $10,376 $10,840 $11,419 5.3%

% Change 7.9% 7.6% 4.8% 4.5% 5.3%

Visitor Spending(US$ Million)

Page 11: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

11

Visitor spending by sector

Traveler spending neared $3.0 billion on food & beverages.

The lodging sector passed the retail sector to become the second largest spending category with $2.3 billion in sales.

In 2014, visitor spending increased 7.8% on recreation & entertainment, 6.4% on food and beverage, and 7.2% on lodging.Note: In this chart Transportation includes local and air

transportation

2,905

2,3392,328

1,7061,502

638

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

Foo

d &

bev

.

Lodg

ing

Ret

ail

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

2nd

Hom

eR

enta

l

2013 2014

$ Million, 2014 values shown

Page 12: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

12

Visitor spending distribution

With strong growth in leisure visits, the share of spending on recreational activities now exceeds 13% of all visitor spending.

The share of the traveler dollar spent on lodging, the largest sector, grew to 26.1% in 2014.

Food & beverage spending ranks second, capturing a quarter of visitor spending, followed by retail at 20%.

Lodging26.1%

Other Transport11.3%

Air3.7%

Food & bev.25.4%

Retail20.4%

Recreation13.2%

Visitor Spending by Sector

Sources: Longwoods International, OTTI, Stats Can, Tourism Economics

Page 13: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

13

Visitor spending trends

$2.4 $2.6 $2.7 $2.8 $3.0

$1.0 $1.1 $1.2 $1.2 $1.3 $0.4 $0.4 $0.4 $0.4 $0.4 $2.3

$2.4 $2.6 $2.7 $2.9

$2.1 $2.2

$2.2 $2.3

$2.3 $1.2$1.2

$1.3$1.4

$1.5

$0

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

$12

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Recreation

Retail

Food & bev.

Air

Other Transport

Lodging

Sources: Longwoods International, OTTI, Stats Can, Tourism Economics

Wisconsin's Visitor Spending by Year, Billions of $

Visitor spending has grown an average of 5.6% annually since 2010.

Lodging sales have increased 25% since 2010.

Page 14: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

14

Visitor spending by market segment

Leisure tourism represents 88% of visitor spending in Wisconsin.

Overnight visitors spend $7.7 billion in Wisconsin, 67% of the total.

Day visitor spending added $3.8 billion in 2014.

Domestic visitors to Wisconsin spent $10.8 billion in 2014, 94% of all visitor spending.

Business $1.4 Day $3.8 Domestic $10.8

Leisure $10.0 Overnight $7.7 Overseas $0.6

Canada $0.1

Total $11.4 Total $11.4 Total $11.4

Business 12.2% Day 32.9% Domestic 94.3%

Leisure 87.8% Overnight 67.1% Overseas 5.0%

Canada 0.7%

Visitor Spending in 2014(US$ Billion)

Purpose Stay Market

SharePurpose Stay Market

Page 15: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

15

Visitor spending by market segment

12.2%

32.9%

94.3%

87.8%

67.1%

5.0%

0.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Purpose Stay Market

Per

cent

age

dist

ribut

ion

Leisure

Day

Overnight

Overseas

Domestic

Business

Canada

Sources: Longwoods International, OTTI, Stats Can, Tourism Economics

Page 16: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

16

Seasonality of lodging

Tourism is a year-round industry in Wisconsin. Its peak is in the third quarter with nearly one-third of all rooms rented. In 2014, room demand in each quarter is at least 20% of all rooms rented.

In 2014, growth was spread throughout the year, with all but Q2 posting room revenue growth of 7% or higher. And Q2 revenue growth only dipped to 5.4%.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Wisconsin Hotel Room Revenue$ millions

Source: Smith Travel Research

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Revenue

Rooms

Wisconsin Hotel Rooms and RevenueQuarterly Share, 2013

Source: Smith Travel Research

Page 17: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

17

Seasonality of visitor spending

Business Day

In 2014, total visitor spending peaked in the 3rd quarter with $3.6 billion in visitor sales.

Spending growth was 3.5% or higher in all four quarters with Q1 posting spending growth of 6.8%.

$2,280

$2,862

$3,645

$2,631

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2013

2014

Wisconsin Quarterly Visitor Spending$ Millions

Source: Tourism Economics

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q42013 $2,135.6 $2,766.2 $3,454.1 $2,484.3

2014 $2,279.9 $2,862.4 $3,645.3 $2,631.5

% Chn 6.76% 3.48% 5.54% 5.93%

Visitor Spending by Quarter Wisconsin

Page 18: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

18

Seasonality of visitor spending

Business Day

Tourism spending has grown in every quarter since 2011.

Growth did hit a slow patch in the second half of 2012 and first part of 2013 before rebounding in the 2nd half of 2013.

The upward trend in quarterly tourism spending growth continued in 2014.

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2011 2012 2013 2014

$

Wisconsin Tourism Spending Growth Y-o-Y Growth Rates by Quarter

Source: Tourism Economics

Page 19: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

State Tourism Impacts

Page 20: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

20

How visitor spending generates impact

• Lastly, the induced impact is generated when employees whose incomes are generated either directly or indirectly by tourism, spend those incomes in the local economy.

• Travelers create direct economic value within a discrete group of sectors (e.g. recreation, transportation). This supports a relative proportion of jobs, wages, and taxes within each sector.

• Each directly affected sector also purchases goods and services as inputs (e.g. food wholesalers, utilities) into production. These impacts are called indirect impacts.

Page 21: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

21

Tourism sales by industry

Direct Indirect Induced TotalAgriculture, Fishing, Mining - 32.3 24.8 57.1 Construction and Utilities - 300.0 112.6 412.6

Manufacturing - 480.1 253.7 733.8

Wholesale Trade - 102.7 154.4 257.1

Air Transport 421.5 4.5 7.5 433.5

Other Transport 447.1 154.8 63.4 665.3

Retail Trade 2,327.9 16.0 293.9 2,637.9

Gasoline Stations 837.9 1.3 19.6 858.8

Communications - 252.0 123.8 375.8

Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 638.5 740.4 1,195.7 2,574.6

Business Services 71.4 775.2 244.4 1,091.0

Education and Health Care - 5.9 727.3 733.2

Recreation and Entertainment 1,236.0 62.2 40.5 1,338.7

Lodging 2,339.3 2.7 2.3 2,344.3

Food & Beverage 2,904.6 128.6 238.2 3,271.3

Personal Services 195.0 124.8 179.1 499.0

Government - 122.2 69.3 191.5

TOTAL 11,419.1 3,305.8 3,750.7 18,475.6

Growth Rate 5.3% 5.7% 5.7% 5.5%* Direct sales include cost of goods sold for retail sectors

Tourism Sales(US$ Million)

Page 22: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

22

All business sectors of the Wisconsin economy benefit from tourism activity directly and/or indirectly.

Sectors that serve the tourism industry, like business services, gain as suppliers to a diverse tourism industry.

Tourism sales by industry

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

F&

B

Ret

ail T

rade

FIR

E

Lodg

ing

Rec

reat

ion

Bus

. Ser

vice

s

Gas

Man

u

Edu

catio

n

Oth

er T

rans

p

Per

sona

l Ser

v.

Air

Tra

nspo

rt

Induced

Indirect

Direct

Tourism Sales by Industry$ million

Page 23: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

23

Total tourism employment

The tourism sector directly and indirectly supported 187,643 jobs, or 7.8% of all employment in Wisconsin last year.

Direct Indirect Induced TotalAgriculture, Fishing, Mining - 382 270 653 Construction and Utilities - 1,014 344 1,357

Manufacturing - 1,303 545 1,848

Wholesale Trade - 624 938 1,562

Air Transport 1,812 16 26 1,854

Other Transport 2,195 1,487 611 4,293

Retail Trade 15,459 231 4,352 20,042

Gasoline Stations 1,672 20 307 1,999

Communications - 1,026 426 1,452

Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 3,495 4,190 4,086 11,770

Business Services 463 8,136 2,658 11,257

Education and Health Care - 84 7,183 7,267

Recreation and Entertainment 24,337 1,274 911 26,522

Lodging 32,755 44 38 32,837

Food & Beverage 48,380 2,499 4,662 55,541

Personal Services 2,353 1,329 2,420 6,103

Government - 922 364 1,285

TOTAL 132,920 24,582 30,142 187,643

Growth Rate 1.1% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2%

Tourism Economy Employment

Page 24: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

24

Total tourism employment

Secondary benefits are realized across the entire economy through the supply chain and incomes as they are spent.

The unemployment rate in Wisconsin was 5.5% in 2014. Without the 187,643 tourism supported jobs, the unemployment rate would nearly double to 10.9%.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

F&

B

Lodg

ing

Re

cre

atio

n

Re

tail

Tra

de

FIR

E

Bus

. S

ervi

ces

Edu

catio

n

Per

son

al S

erv

.

Oth

er T

rans

p

Ga

s

Air

Tra

nspo

rt

Man

u

Thousands

Induced

Indirect

Direct

Tourism Employment by Industry

Significant indirect and induced benefits

Page 25: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

25

Tourism employment intensity

3.7%

4.1%

22.8%

33.8%

92.4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

Retail

Food & bev.

Recreation

Lodging

Tourism Employment Intensity by Industry

Tourism is a significant part of several industries – 92% of lodging, 34% of recreation, and 23% of food & beverage employment is directly supported by tourism spending.

Page 26: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

26

Tourism personal income

Direct Indirect Induced TotalAgriculture, Fishing, Mining - 5.9 5.2 11.1 Construction and Utilities - 80.9 28.9 109.9

Manufacturing - 76.1 32.1 108.1

Wholesale Trade - 44.1 66.3 110.4

Air Transport 99.0 0.9 1.4 101.2

Other Transport 108.0 70.5 27.8 206.3

Retail Trade 346.8 6.7 120.4 473.8

Gasoline Stations 42.6 0.5 7.7 50.8

Communications - 58.2 26.3 84.5

Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 60.9 137.0 138.8 336.7

Business Services 22.5 386.9 125.5 534.9

Education and Health Care - 3.1 384.8 387.9

Recreation and Entertainment 414.3 23.2 14.9 452.4

Lodging 660.1 0.7 0.6 661.4

Food & Beverage 776.9 39.4 82.8 899.0

Personal Services 79.8 57.3 71.2 208.3

Government - 68.6 24.4 93.0

TOTAL 2,610.9 1,060.0 1,159.0 4,829.9

Pch Change 3.9% 3.9% 3.1% 3.7%

Tourism Labor Income (Compensation)(US$ Million)

Page 27: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

27

Tourism personal income

Substantial employment in F&B and recreation supports significant labor income in those industries.

Business services and the FIRE (finance, insurance and real estate) sectors depend on tourism activity as suppliers to tourism companies and their employees.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

F&

B

Lodg

ing

Bus

. Ser

vice

s

Ret

ail T

rade

Rec

reat

ion

Edu

catio

n

FIR

E

Per

sona

l Ser

v.

Oth

er T

rans

p

Who

lesa

le T

r.

Con

stru

ctio

n

Man

u

Induced

Indirect

Direct

Tourism Labor Income by Industry$ million

Significant indirect and induced benefits

Page 28: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

28

Tourism tax generation

Taxes of $2.5 billion were directly and indirectly generated by tourism in 2014.

State and local taxes alone tallied $1.4 billion.

Tax Type 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Federal Taxes Subtotal 917.6 944.5 977.0 1,011.0 1,052.3

Corporate 81.9 87.4 91.5 95.6 100.8

Indirect Business 104.8 112.0 117.2 122.4 129.1

Personal Income 212.6 216.8 223.5 230.7 239.2

Social Security 518.2 528.4 544.8 562.3 583.1

State and Local Taxes Subtotal 1,202.1 1,269.8 1,312.3 1,356.3 1,412.3

Corporate 113.2 120.9 126.6 132.2 139.4

Personal Income 101.9 103.9 107.2 110.6 114.7

Sales 425.3 453.1 473.4 490.4 514.8

Bed 72.7 77.3 80.9 84.6 90.7

Property 370.9 391.7 397.8 408.3 417.5

Excise and Fees 108.5 113.0 116.4 119.9 124.4

State Unemployment 9.6 9.8 10.1 10.4 10.8

TOTAL 2,119.6 2,214.3 2,289.3 2,367.3 2,464.6

Traveler Generated Taxes(US$ Million)

In 2014, each household in Wisconsin would have been taxed an additional $620 to replace the tourism taxes received by state and local governments.

Page 29: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

29

Tourism tax generation – state & local government

Of the $1.4 billion collected by state and local governments from traveler activity, $767 million (54%) accrued to state government.

Local government revenues from visitor activity grew to $647 million.

Property tax revenue, along with local excise and fees and lodging taxes, comprise the major revenue streams for local governments.

Tax Type 2012 2013 2014

State Tax Subtotal 706.0 731.8 767.1

Corporate 126.6 132.2 139.4

Personal Income 107.2 110.6 114.7

Sales 438.0 453.7 476.3

Lodging 0.0 0.0 0.0

Property 0.0 0.0 0.0

Excise and Fees 24.2 25.0 25.9

State Unemployment 10.1 10.4 10.8

Local Tax Subtotal 606.3 625.5 647.3

Corporate 0.0 0.0 0.0

Personal Income 0.0 0.0 0.0

Sales 35.4 36.7 38.5

Lodging 80.9 85.6 92.7

Property 397.8 408.3 417.5

Excise and Fees 92.2 95.0 98.5

State Unemployment 0.0 0.0 0.0

Traveler Generated Taxes - State and

Local Government Revenues

(US$ Million)

Page 30: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

30

Were the Wisconsin tourism industry a single business, it would rank #242 on the Forbes 500 list, similar in size to Visa, Inc. and CarMax and larger than Norfolk Southern or Office Depot.

Visitor spending of $11.4 billion is equal to the total revenue of the Wisconsin Lottery… since 1988.

Total sales in supported by tourism in Wisconsin reached $18.5 billion in 2014.

By comparison, worldwide revenue of Wisconsin’s 4th largest company – Kohl’s – was $19 billion in 2014

How important is tourism?

Page 31: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

31

Were the 133,000 direct tourism jobs located all in one county, it would be enough jobs for EVERY resident in Washington County – the 11th largest county in the state.

The total tourism employment of 187,643 is more than the total employment of the Appleton AND Janesville-Beloit MSA’s.

How important is tourism?

Page 32: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

32

Each household in Wisconsin benefits from tourism, saving $620 in 2014 in taxes as visitor activity supports state and local governmental revenue.

■ That is enough for a annual golfing membership at Christmas Mountain Village or

■ 20-Game Fan's Choice Plan in the outfield for the Milwaukee Brewers or

■ About 20 separate admissions to a waterpark in Wisconsin Dells (assuming average price of $30).

How important is tourism?

Page 33: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

Methodology and Background

Page 34: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

34

By monitoring tourism’s economic impact, policy makers can make informed decisions regarding the funding and prioritization of tourism development.

It can also carefully monitor its successes and future needs.

In order to do this, tourism must be measured in the same categories as other economic sectors – i.e. tax generation, employment, wages, and gross domestic product.

Why quantify the tourism economy?

Page 35: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

35

Why is this a challenge?

Most economic sectors such as financial services, insurance, or construction are easily defined within a country’s national accounts statistics.

Tourism is not so easily measured because it is not a single industry. It is a demand-side activity which affects multiple sectors to various degrees.

Tourism spans nearly a dozen sectors including lodging, recreation, retail, real estate, air passenger transport, food & beverage, car rental, taxi services, travel agents…

Page 36: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

36

• Domestic visitor expenditure estimates are provided by Longwoods International’s representative survey of US travelers. These are broken out by sectors (lodging, transport at destination, food & beverage, retail, and recreation), by purpose (business and leisure), and by length of stay (day and overnight).

• Tourism Economics then adjusts these levels of spending based on a range of known measures of tourism activity:

• Overseas visitor spending (source: OTTI, TE)

• Canada visitor spending (source: Statistics Canada, TE)

• Sales tax receipts

• Spending on air travel which accrues to all airports and locally-based airlines

• Gasoline purchases by visitors (source: TE calculation)

• Smith Travel Research data on hotel revenues

• Industry data on employment, wages, GDP, and sales (source: BEA, BLS, Census)

Methods and data sources

Page 37: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

37

• An IMPLAN model was compiled for the State of Wisconsin. This traces

the flow of visitor-related expenditures through the local economy and

their effects on employment, wages, and taxes. IMPLAN also quantifies

the indirect (supplier) and induced (income) impacts of tourism.

• All results are benchmarked and cross-checked and adjusted based on

the following:

• US Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis

(employment and wages by industry)

• US Census (business sales by industry)

• The source of the employment and wage data is the Regional Economic

Information System (REIS), Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S.

Department of Commerce. All employment rankings are based on Bureau

of Labor Statistics (ES202/QCEW) data.

Methods and data sources

Page 38: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

38

Selected recent economic impact clients

Cities

Baltimore, MD

Columbus, OH

Kansas City, MO

London, United Kingdom

New York City

Omaha, NE

Orlando, FL

Philadelphia, PA

Pittsburgh, PA

Rockford, IL

Countries / Provinces

Bahamas

Bermuda

Cayman Islands

Dubai

Ontario Canada

St. Lucia

United Kingdom

Associations / Companies

Center for Exhibition Industry Research (Economic Impact of Visa Restrictions)

DMAI (Event Impact Calculator for 80 CVBs)

US Travel Association (Impact of travel promotion)

InterContinental Hotels

States

California

Georgia

Maryland

New York

North Carolina

Ohio

Pennsylvania

Wisconsin

Page 39: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

39

About Tourism Economics

Tourism Economics, headquartered in Philadelphia, is an Oxford Economics company dedicated to providing high value, robust, and relevant analyses of the tourism sector that reflects the dynamics of local and global economies. By combining quantitative methods with industry knowledge, Tourism Economics designs custom market strategies, project feasibility analysis, tourism forecasting models, tourism policy analysis, and economic impact studies.

Our staff have worked with over 300 destinations to quantify the economic value of tourism, forecast demand, guide strategy, or evaluate tourism policies.

Oxford Economics is one of the world’s leading providers of economic analysis, forecasts and consulting advice. Founded in 1981 as a joint venture with Oxford University’s business college, Oxford Economics is founded on a reputation for high quality, quantitative analysis and evidence-based advice. For this, it draws on its own staff of 90 highly-experienced professional economists; a dedicated data analysis team; global modeling tools; close links with Oxford University, and a range of partner institutions in Europe, the US and in the United Nations Project Link.

For more information: [email protected].

Page 40: April 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Wisconsin

40

For more information:

Adam Sacks, President

[email protected]

Christopher Pike, Senior Economist

[email protected]