arabidopsis aintegumenta (ant) mediates salt …...2015/06/08 · sos3-like calcium binding...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.
Arabidopsis AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) Mediates Salt Tolerance
by Trans-repressing SCABP8
Lai-Sheng Meng*1,3, 4 , Yi-Bo Wang2, Shun-Qiao Yao1 and Aizhong Liu
*1
1. Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of
Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, PR
China.
2. School of Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Tianshui Normal University, 741001,
PR China.
3. Division of Molecular Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and
Technology, Hyoja-dong, Pohang, Kyungbuk, 790-784, Republic of Korea.
4. School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,
Anhui Province, 230027, PR China.
*Corresponding authors: [email protected]; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The Arabidopsis AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) gene, which encodes an APETALA2
(AP2)-like transcription factor, controls plant organ cell number and organ size
throughout shoot development. ANT is thus a key factor in plant shoot development.
Here, we found that ANT plays an essential role in conferring salt tolerance in
Arabidopsis. ant--Knock Out (KO) mutants presented a salt-tolerant phenotype,
whereas 35S:ANT transgenic plants exhibited more sensitive phenotypes under high
salt stress. Further analysis indicated ANT functioned mainly in the shoot response to
salt toxicity. Target gene analysis revealed that ANT bound to the promoter of
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
JCS Advance Online Article. Posted on 8 June 2015
SOS3-LIKE CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN8 (SCABP8), which encodes a putative
calcium sensor, thereby inhibiting SCABP8 expression. It has been reported that the
salt sensitivity of scabp8 is more prominent in shoot tissues. Genetic experiments
indicated that the mutation of SCABP8 suppresses the ant-KO salt-tolerant phenotype,
implying that ANT functions as a negative transcriptional regulator of SCABP8 upon
salt stress. Together, the above results reveal that ANT is a novel regulator of salt
stress, and that ANT binds to the SCABP8 promoter, mediating salt tolerance.
Key-words: AINTEGUMENTA (ANT), SOS3-LIKE CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN8
(SCABP8)/CALCINEURIN B-LIKE10, salt stress, trans-repression, shoot, Arabidopsis
.
INTRODUCTION
Soil salinity is a major abiotic stress that decreases plant growth, ranking among the
leading factors limiting agricultural productivity. High concentrations of NaCl can
arrest plant development and result in plant death. Salt stress triggers several
interacting events in plants, including the inhibition of enzymatic activity in metabolic
pathways, decreased uptake of nutrients in roots, decreased carbon use efficiency, and
the denaturation of protein and membrane structures.
The SOS (for Salt Overly Sensitive) pathway is thought to play essential roles in
conferring salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. SOS3, the first gene derived from
this family to be cloned, was obtained via genetic screening of salt-sensitive
mutants and map-based cloning (Liu and Zhu, 1998). SOS3 shows physical
interaction with and activation of SOS2, a protein kinase (Halfter et al., 2000), thus
forming a SOS2-SOS3 complex that in turn activates SOS1, a plasma membrane
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Na+/H+ antiporter (Shi et al., 2000; Qiu et al., 2002). Although calcium is not
required for SOS2 and SOS3 to interact in this process, calcium is thought to increase
the phosphorylation of the synthesized substrate p3 via the SOS2-SOS3 complex
(Halfter et al., 2000). SCABP8/CBL10 as a putative calcium sensor interacts with the
protein kinase SOS2 to protect Arabidopsis shoots from salt stress by modulating ion
homeostasis (Quan et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007). While similar functions in
biochemical and cellular tests are fulfilled, SCABP8 and SOS3 must perform distinct
regulatory functions in the salt stress response since, for example, they could not
replace each other in genetic complementation experiments (Quan et al., 2007).
The mutations in SOS1, SOS2, and SOS3 all decrease the Na+/H+ exchange
activity and a constitutively active SOS2 enhances Na+/H+ exchange activity in an
SOS1-dependent and SOS3-independent manner (Qiu et al., 2002). The root and
shoot growth of sos1 and sos2 mutants is more significantly inhibited than that of
sos3 under mild salt stress (Zhu et al., 1998). However, SCABP8/CBL10 mainly
protects Arabidopsis shoots from salt stress (Quan et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007).
Consistent with their function, the expression of SOS1 and SOS2 is detected in both
root and shoot tissues, whereas the expression of SCABP8 is mainly detected in shoot
tissues (Liu et al., 2000; Shi et al., 2002; Quan et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007).
AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) which encodes a transcription factor of the
AP2-domain family has been found only in plant systems (Mizukami and Fischer,
2000). Like AP2, ANT contains two AP2 domains homologous with the DNA
binding domain of ethylene response element binding proteins (Mizukami and
Fischer, 2000). ANT as a transcription factor is strongly expressed in many dividing
tissues in the plant, in which it plays central roles in developmental processes such
as shoot and flower meristem maintenance, organ size and polarity, flower
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
initiation, ovule development, floral organ identity as well as cell proliferation
(Horstman et al., 2014).
Here, we report that ANT mainly protects Arabidopsis shoots from salt stress
and show that SCABP8 is a downstream target of ANT in the regulation of salt stress
since the mutation of SCABP8 suppresses the ant-KO salt-tolerant phenotype,
implying that SCABP8 plays a predominant role in inhibiting ANT-induced salt
tolerance. Thus, ANT is a novel regulator of salt stress, binding to the SCABP8
promoter in order to mediate salt tolerance.
RESULTS
ANT expression patterns
The Arabidopsis ANT gene encoding an AP2-like transcription factor controls plant
organ cell number and organ size throughout shoot development (Mizukami and
Fischer, 2000). ANT is mainly detected in the tissues of activizing division (including
young leaf blades, leaf veins, stem veins, stamens, pistils, meristem tissue and
vascular cylinder) but not in mature tissue or root tissue (including the mature zone of
roots and mature leaves) (Figures 1A-H; also see Mizukami and Fischer., 2000; Elliot
et al., 1996; Klucher et al., 1996). In the roots, ANT was only expressed in the root
tips and vascular cylinder (Figures 1G and H). Thus, it appears that ANT mainly
functions in shoot tissue; this result is consistent with ANT’s role in controlling plant
organ cell number and organ size throughout shoot development (Mizukami and
Fischer, 2000). In this work, we found that the ant-KO mutant, but not 35S:ANT,
exhibited a tolerant phenotype under high salt stress (Figure 2). To examine whether
the expression of ANT is induced by NaCl treatment, total RNA was extracted from
wild-type plants that had been treated with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM NaCl for 3 and 6
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
h. The transcription of ANT was significantly lower at 3 and 6 h after treatment in
comparison with the control plants (Supplemental Figure 1A).
ant-KO and 35S:ANT show different responses to high sodium salt stress
To further determine whether ANT is involved in the regulation of salt stress
response, ant-KO (SALK-022770) and 35S:ANT were analyzed. RT-PCR indicated
that the 35S:ANT lines over-accumulated ANT transcripts compared with the wild
type, whereas ANT was eliminated in the ant-KO (SALK-022770) lines (see
Supplemental Figure 1B).
We sowed seeds of the ant-KO mutant, 35S:ANT and wild-type (Col-0) lines on
solid MS medium with 100 mM NaCl for 30 days. The salt tolerance of the ant-KO
plants was maintained throughout their development from seedlings to mature plants,
whereas a number of 35S:ANT transgenic plants were dry and dead compared with the
wild type (Col-0) (Supplemental Figure 2A). The ant-KO exhibited longer primary
roots, whereas the 35S:ANT showed shorter primary roots than wild type did
(Supplemental Figures 2A and B). The number of ant-KO lateral roots was enhanced,
whereas the number of 35S:ANT lateral roots was not different relative to that of the
wild type (Supplemental Figures 2A and C). Consequently, whereas the overall root
fresh weight of the ant-KO mutant was only ~1.6 times greater than that of the wild
type (Supplemental Figure 2E), shoot fresh weight in the ant-KO mutant was
enhanced by ~2.9 times over the wild type (Col-0), and its leaves were also larger
(Supplemental Figures 2A and D). However, seedling weight of ant-KO, 35S:ANT
and WT was not different on medium without salt (Supplemental Figure 3)
To further characterize the salt insensitivity of the 35S:ANT and ant-KO mutant,
5-day-old seedlings were transferred to solid MS medium with NaCl (75 mM NaCl
and 100 mM NaCl) for 15 days. On solid MS medium with both 75 mM NaCl and
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
100 mM NaCl, the length of the ant-KO primary roots was increased, whereas the
length of the 35S:ANT primary roots was not different relative to that of the wild type
(Figures 2A and B). On MS medium with 75 mM NaCl, the number of ant-KO lateral
roots was enhanced, whereas the number of 35S:ANT lateral roots was not
significantly different relative to that of the wild type (Figures 2A and C). However,
on MS medium with 100 mM NaCl, the number of ant-KO lateral roots was
enhanced, while the number of 35S:ANT lateral roots was reduced relative to that of
the wild type (Figures 2A and C). Consequently, whereas the overall root fresh weight
in the ant-KO mutant was increased over that of the wild type (Col-0) by only ~1.16
and ~1.22 times on MS medium with 75 mM NaCl and 100 mM NaCl, respectively
(Figures 2A and E), shoot fresh weight in the ant-KO mutant was ~1.44 and ~ 1.53
times greater on MS medium with 75 mM NaCl and 100 mM NaCl, respectively
(Figures 2A and D). Moreover, shoot fresh weight in the 35S:ANT plants was
decreased on MS medium with 100 mM NaCl ( Figures 2A and D). However,
seedling weight of ant-KO, 35S:ANT and wild type was not different on medium
without salt (Supplemental Figure 3).
To confirm that ANT is involved in regulation of salt stress, we assay whether
ant-KO +35SANT lines (transforming the mutant with a genomic DNA of ANT) can
restore ant-KO less sensitive to similar to wild-type. Five-day-old ant-KO, ant-KO+
35S:ANT, 35S:ANT and Col-0 seedlings were transferred to solid MS medium with
100 mM NaCl for 10 days. On solid MS medium without NaCl, the weight of the
15-day-old shoots was not different (Supplemental Figures 3A and B). However, on
MS medium with 100 mM NaCl, the weight of 15-day-old ant-KO shoots was
enhanced, whereas that of corresponding 35S:ANT was declined (Supplemental
Figures 3A and B). And the weight of shoots between ant-KO+ 35S:ANT and Col-0
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
seedlings was not different (Supplemental Figures 3A and B), indicating the ant-KO
mutant phenotype can be rescued.
Together, our findings indicates that ANT functions mainly in the shoot response
to salt toxicity.
ant-KO mutant and 35S:ANT seedlings are not specific to the sodium response
To determine whether the growth defects of the ant-KO mutant and 35S:ANT
seedlings are specific to the sodium response; these seedlings were treated with a few
kinds of salts. With treatment with 100 mM KCl, ant-KO mutant and 35S:ANT
seedlings presented less sensitive and more sensitive relative to wild-type,
respectively (Figures 3A-D). Similarly, with treatment with 10 mM LiCl, ant-KO
mutant and 35S:ANT seedlings also presented less sensitive and more sensitive
relative to wild-type, respectively (Figures 3A-D). Furthermore, with treatment with
combination of both 100 mM KCl and 10 mM LiCl, ant-KO mutant and 35S:ANT
seedlings presented less sensitive and more sensitive relative to single 100 mM KCl
or 10 mM LiCl, respectively (Supplenental Figure 4). However, seedling weight of
ant-KO, 35S:ANT and WT was not different on medium without salt (Supplemental
Figure 4).
ANT negatively modulates SCABP8 at the transcriptional level
To detect the downstream target genes of ANT, the expression levels of the genes
involved in salt stress response were analyzed through quantitative RT-PCR. The
SOS pathway plays an essential role in the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Thus, SOS1, SOS2, SOS3 and SCABP8 were the first genes examined. Transcripts of
SCABP8 were much more abundant in ant-KO, whereas transcripts of SCABP8 were
lower in 35S:ANT compared with the wild type (Figure 4A). We also observed that
the expression levels of SOS1, SOS2 and SOS3 were not significantly different
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
between ant-KO, 35S:ANT and wild-type plants (Figure 4A). Moreover, ANT
transcript abundance was similar between wild-type, sos1, sos2, sos3 and scabp8
plants (Figure 4B). Therefore, ANT negatively modulates SCABP8 expression at the
transcript level. Plant NHX1, NHX4, NHX5 and NHX6 transporters are involved in
salt tolerance (Hernandez et al., 2009; Bassil et al., 2011). These findings
demonstrated that the expression level of these genes was not altered in 35S:ANT
seedlings relative to wild-type (Figure 4G), indicating ANT looks at SCABP8
regulating specifically.
ANT associates with the SCABP8 promoter both In vitro and In vivo
To investigate binding of ANT to SCABP8 promoter, we performed nucleotide
sequence analysis and found that the two AP2 domains in ANT were selectively
associated with the consensus sequence gCAC(A/G)N(A/T)TcCC(a/g)ANG(c/t)
(Nole-Wilson and Krizek, 2000; Krizek, 2003). Our nucleotide sequence analysis also
found that the promoters of the SCABP8 gene contained conserved sequence motifs
(Figure 5 and Figure 4C). This portion of ANT corresponds to the two AP2 repeats
and the linker region between them and will be referred to as ANT-AP2R1R2
(Nole-Wilson and Krizek, 2000). The GST fused with the DNA-binding domain in
the ANT-AP2R1R2 was expressed in Escherichia coli, and then these fused proteins
were purified with the help of the GST tag. A gel mobility shift assay was performed
to assay whether the recombinant ANT-AP2R1R2 protein could associate to the
SCABP8 promoter. When the ANT-AP2R1R2 protein and the probes of the
ANT-binding consensus sequences were added, a shifted DNA-binding was
detectable; no band was detected when only the probes of the ANT-binding consensus
sequences were added (Figures 5A and B). When unlabeled probes of the
ANT-binding consensus sequences were added to the reaction mixture, the
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
DNA-binding was abolished (Figure 5B). However, the GST-ANT protein was
unable to bind the mutated DNA probes (Figures 5C and D). These data indicate that
the ANT-AP2R1R2 DNA-binding site binds to the SCABP8 promoter In vitro.
To further confirm the binding possibility in vivo, we used transgenic shoots
expressing the 35S:ANT:HA construct for a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
analysis. The use of the S1 region (-1456 to -1152 bp) of the primer resulted in greater
amounts of PCR product than the use of the S2 (-1152 to -852 bp) or S3 (-348 to -48
bp) regions (Figures 4D and E). These data clearly indicated that ANT bound to the
SCABP8 promoter in vivo, as was required to suppress SCABP8 expression.
ANT acts genetically upstream of SCABP8
To assay whether ANT acted genetically upstream of SCABP8 in regulating the salt
stress response, we performed a double mutant analysis by combining ant-KO with
scabp8 lines that were insensitive and supersensitive under high salt stress,
respectively. We selected the genotypes from the segregating F3 population by PCR
genotyping. The SCABP8 mutation significantly suppressed the insensitive
phenotypes of the ant-KO line under high salt stress (Figure 6). The length of the
ant-KO primary roots was obviously increased, whereas the lengths of the
ant-KOscabp8 and scabp8 primary roots were significantly reduced relative to that of
the wild type on solid MS medium with NaCl (75 mM NaCl and 100 mM NaCl)
(Figures 6A and B). The overall shoot and root fresh weights in the ant-KO mutants
were increased, whereas those in the ant-KOscabp8 and scabp8 mutants were
decreased relative to those of the wild type on MS medium with 75 mM NaCl and
100 mM NaCl, respectively (Figures 6A, C and D). Together, the above results
indicate that ANT acts genetically upstream of SCABP8 in regulating the salt stress
response (Figure 7).
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
DISCUSSION
ANT encoding a transcription factor of the APETALA2 family is involved in cell
proliferation and growth control (Elliott et al., 1996; Klucher et al., 1996; Eshed et al.,
1999; Krizek, 1999; Mizukami and Fischer, 2000; Nole-Wilson and Krizek, 2000;
Mizukami, 2001). Here, we showed that ant-KO mutants presented a salt-tolerant
phenotype, whereas transgenic plants harboring the 35S:ANT construct exhibited
more sensitive phenotype under high salt stress. Under normal growth conditions in
the glasshouse, 35S:ANT exhibited more cell number and larger organ size (seeds,
leaves, flowers, large root systems and higher weight) (Mizukami and Fischer, 2000),
at the same time, 35S:ANT plants were hypersensitivity to salt stress. Thus, the
regulator of plant development might be involved in modulating environmental stress.
Arabidopsis AN3, a transcription co-activator, is an important regulator of leaf and
light-induced root development (Kim and Kende, 2004; Horiguchi et al., 2005; Meng,
2015). Very recently, we found that AN3 controls water-use efficiency (WUE) and
drought tolerance through regulating stomatal density and improving root architecture
via the transrepression of YODA (YDA) (Meng and Yao, 2015). The Arabidopsis E3
SUMO ligase SIZ1 regulates both plant growth and drought tolerance, that is, the null
mutant siz1-3 shows smaller organ size due to reduced expression of genes involved
in brassinosteroid biosynthesis and signaling, at the same time, mutant seedlings of
siz1-3 exhibit significantly lower tolerance to drought stress (Catala et al., 2007).
Loss-of-function of PROTEIN S-ACYL TRANSFERASE10 (PAT10) leads to
pleiotropic growth defects, including smaller leaves, dwarfism, and sterility, while
pat10 mutants exhibits hypersensitive to salt stresses (Zhou et al., 2013). NHX1
(K+/H+) and NHX2 are vacuolar proteins, and they control vacuolar pH and K+
homeostasis and salt tolerance (Bassil et al., 2011). Thus, the role of NHX1 and
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
NHX2 is regulating K+/H+ exchange, and this exchange modulates cell expansion in
rapidly elongating tissues, for example, filaments and hypocotyls, and plays unique
and specific roles in flower development (Bassil et al., 2011). We speculate that
similar to the role of NHX1 and NHX2, ANT might be involved in regulating either
plant growth or development by SOS system regulation, which SCABP8/CBL10 as a
putative calcium sensor interacts with the protein kinase SOS2 to protect Arabidopsis
shoots from salt stress by modulating ion homeostasis (Quan et al., 2007; Kim et al.,
2007). The connection between plant development and environmental stress could
open up future research to provide further insights into the relative mechanism that
occurs between the development and stress.
On MS medium supplemented with 100 mM NaCl, sos3, 35S:ANT and scabp8
mutants exhibited severe growth suppression in both shoot and root tissues, however
nearly complete growth arrest occurred only in the root of sos3 and the shoot of
35S:ANT and scabp8 plants (Zhu et al., 1998; Quan et al., 2007; Figure 2). At a lower
NaCl concentration (75 mM), the influence of sos3 mutation on salt tolerance was
significantly suppressed to root growth (Zhu et al., 1998), whereas the influence of the
35S:ANT and scabp8 mutation was more inhibited in shoot growth (Quan et al., 2007;
Figure 2). These findings tell us that salt tolerance in planta under extreme situations
are necessary for the functional integration of all tissues but also that SOS3, ANT and
SCABP8 are needed for salt tolerance in a tissue-specific manner. Consistent with
these findings, their respective expression patterns as assayed via promoter-GUS
fusions (Figure 1; also see Quan et al., 2007). SOS3 was only expressed in root
tissues, particularly in root tips, whereas ANT and SCABP8 was preferentially
expressed in shoot tissues. Thus, SCABP8 and ANT mainly protects shoot tissues,
whereas SOS3 protects root tissues from salt stress, suggesting tissue-specific manner
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
may be important for plant doing with environmental stress.
While the expression of SCABP8 was up-regulated by salt stress, the expression
of ANT was down-regulated by salt stress, indicating that ANT and SCABP8 differ in
their transcriptional regulation in response to salinity. Functional analyses, as well as
the specific sodium sensitivity of the sos1, sos2, sos3, and scabp8 mutants, imply that
SOS3 and SCABP8 have overlapping functions in the activation of SOS2 and its
downstream target, SOS1 (Figure 7; also see Quan et al., 2007). Thus, we conclude
that ANT directly binds to SCABP8 promoter for regulating the SOS signaling
cascade in the salt stress response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials and growth conditions
sos1, sos2, sos3 and scabp8 (Quan et al., 2007) mutants in the Col-0 background have
been described previously. ant-KO (SALK-022770), ant-KO+35S:ANT and 35S:ANT
seeds (Ph2GW7; Col-0 background; homozygote; hygromycin) were kindly provided
by Prof. H.G. Nam (DGSIT, Korea). ant-KO (SALK-022770) is a T-DNA mutant, the
single pass sequence of which was recovered from the left border of the T-DNA; and
this sequence lies within 300 bases of the 3' end of At4g37750, as has been described
by ABRC. Transgenic plants were generated using the Agrobacterium
tumefaciens–mediated floral dip method (Zhang et al., 2006). For ant-KO and
35S:ANT identification, the primers F-5'-ATG AAG TCT TTT TGT GAT AAT
GA-3' and R-5'-TTC AAT CTC TTT CTG ATA ATT CTC-3' were used. ant-8
(CS3944) was obtained from ABRC.
Double ant-KOscabp8 mutants were generated through genetic crosses, and
homozygous lines were identified through comparison with the parental phenotype
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
and PCR-based genotyping. The ANT gene-specific primers were F-5'-GAG AAG
GAA GAG CAG TGG TTT CT-3' and R-5'-CAG ATG TTC GGA TCC AAT ATG G
-3'; the SCABP8 gene-specific primers have been described previously (Quan et al.,
2007).
Plants exhibiting the 35S:ANT phenotype [large rosette leaves and large seeds
grown in white light (Mizukami and Fischer., 2000)] in the F2 populations were
screened for Dr5:GUS expression in roots. F3 seed was collected from those
exhibiting expression, and lines expressing GUS in all F3 plants were used for
subsequent analysis.
The seeds were subjected to 4°C for 3 days and then sown onto solid Murashige
and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1% sucrose. The roots, seeds, leaves and
embryos were photographed, and then they were determined using Image J software.
The seedlings grown on agar were maintained in a growth room under 16/8 h
light/dark cycles with cool white fluorescent light at 21°C ± 2°C. Plants grown in
soilless media were maintained in a controlled environment growth room under 16/8
h light/dark cycles with cool white fluorescent light at 21°C ± 2°C.
Salt sensitivity
Seeds of the mutant and wild-type (Col-0) plants were sterilized in a solution
containing 30% sodium hypochlorite and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, washed five
times with sterilized water, and sown on MS medium with 0.8% Phytagel
(Sigma-Aldrich). The plates were placed at 4°C for 3 days, and the seeds were then
germinated vertically at 21°C ± 2°C under continual illumination. Five-day-old
seedlings with a root length of ~1.5 cm were transferred onto MS medium with salt
added as previously described (Quan et al., 2007).
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the tissues indicated in the figures using TRIZOL
reagent (Invitrogen), as has been previously described by Yu et al. (2008). SYBR
green was used to monitor the kinetics of the PCR products in the real-time RT-PCR,
as has been previously described by Yu et al. (2008). To analyze the expression levels
of SOS1, SOS2, SOS3 and SCABP8 in Col-0, ant-KO and 35S:ANT seedlings, the
following primers were used: F-5'-ATG ACG ACT GTA ATC GAC GCG AC-3' and
R-5'-CGA ATT CCA TGG CCG ATC TTT C -3' for SOS1; F-5'-ATG ACA AAG
AAA ATG AGA AGA GT -3' and R-5'-CAC AAA CTC CAA AAC TAT ATA T-3'
for SOS2; F-5'- TGC AAT GCG ACC ACC GGG AT-3' and R-5'- TTT CAT GGA
CCG GCG CGC TT-3' for SOS3; F-5'-ATT GCC GCA GCA CAT CGC CT -3' and
R-5'- TGG AGC TTG GAA CAG CGC CAG-3' for SCABP8. To analyze the
expression levels of NHX1, NHX4, NHX5 and NHX6 in Col-0 and 35S:ANT seedlings,
the following primers were used: F-5'-ATG TTG GAT TCT CTA GTG TCG A-3' and
R-5'- ACG AAA TTG CGG AAA AAC TGC TT-3' for NHX1; F-5'-ATG GTG ATC
GGA TTA AGC ACA AT-3' and R-5'-TGG AAG AAG ATA AAT AAA GAA GAG
-3' for NHX2; F-5'-ATG GAG GAA GTG ATG ATT TCT C-3' and R-5'- TTT
AGG TTG AAG ACT GAA ACC TG-3' for NHX5; F-5'-ATG TCG TCG GAG CTG
CAG AT-3' and R-5'-GAA AGA AGA ACT CAT CGT GGA AA -3' for NHX6.
To analyze ANT expression in Col-0, sos1, sos2, sos3 and scabp8 seedlings, the
primers F-5'- AGG TGG CAA GCA CGG ATT GGT -3' and R-5'- AGG CAA CGC
GAA AAT CGC CG-3' were used. To analyze the expression levels of ANT in Col-0,
ant-KO and 35S:ANT seedlings, the following primers were used: F-TCT TCT TCT
GTT CCA CCT CAA C; R-TCT GCA GCT TCT TCT TGG GTT. R-5-AAT ACG
TCG GCG ATT CTC CG-3; F-5-CTT AGG AGA AGG AAA CAC TG-3 were used
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
for TUB4.
Plasmid constructs
For the ANT promoter analysis, the promoter-GUS construct At4g37750 was created
by inserting approximately 2.0 Kb promoter fragments into pCB308R, as previously
described by Lei et al. (2007). The primers used for ANT were P1-ggg gac aag ttt gta
caa aaa agc agg ct GTT CAA TAA ATA TGT TTC CAC GTA and P2- ggg gac cac
tttg tac aag aaa gct ggg t CGC TTT TAG CCC TAC AAA TTC C. To obtain the
ANT:HA plasmid (CB2004), we used the primers F-ggg gac aag ttt gta caa aaa agc
agg ct TTC AAT CTC TTT CTG ATA ATT CTC and R--ggg gac cac tttg tac aag aaa
gct ggg t TCA AGA ATC AGC CCA AGC AGC.
GUS staining
Using a buffer mix (1 mM X-gluc, 60 mM NaPO4 buffer, 0.4 mM of
K3Fe(CN)6/K4Fe(CN)6 and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100), the samples (transgenic plants
harboring and expressing Pro ANT:GUS ) were stained and then incubated at 37°C for
8 h. After GUS staining, chlorophyll was removed using washes of 30%, 50%, 70%,
90% and 100% ethanol for approximately 30 min each. GUS staining was performed
as previously described by Lei et al. (2007).
ChIP assay
Transgenic lines overexpressing 35S:ANT:HA were used in this assay. ChIP was
performed as previously described (Yoo et al., 2010). HA and GFP tag-specific
monoclonal antibody was used for ChIP analysis. The ChIP DNA products were
analyzed through Q-PCR using primers that were synthesized to amplify ~ 300 bp
DNA fragments in the promoter region of SCABP8. The following primer sequences
were used: S1 'P1-ataaacaattttaatctcgata; P2-attttgcggtatattttgttatt'; S2
'P3-aaaatagacaacaaattctttt; P4-aatcataatatatgacctttga'; S3 'P5-gttgagattccaactagtatat;
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
P6- tgtcttatcaaa ctctatagttg'.
Protein expression and purification
The plasmid pGEX-5X-1 for ANT was used in this experiment. The coding sequence
of ANT was amplified using the primer pair (5ʹ-GGA TCC ATG AAG TCT TTT TGT
GA-3ʹ and 5ʹ- GAA TTC AGA ATC AGC CCA AGC-3ʹ ) and cloned into the BamHI
and EcoRI restriction sites of the pET28a plasmid to generate the final plasmid.
Recombinant glutathione S-transferase binding protein (GST)-tagged ANT was
extracted from transformed E. coli (Rosetta2) after 10 h of incubation at 16°C
following induction with 10 µM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside. These
recombinant proteins were purified using GST-agarose affinity.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
The electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed using the LightShift
Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (Pierce, 20148) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. The biotin-labeled DNA fragments (5'-
gaaccgaccagttaaccgataattatacatccggtttgacttacccataatttatccaaaactaatccgattttga-3') and
mutated DNA fragments (5'-gaagggaccagttaagggataattatacatccggttt
gacttacccataatttatccaaaactaatgggattttga-3') were synthesized, annealed and used as
probes, and unlabeled versions of the same DNA fragments were used as competitors
in this assay. The probes were incubated with the ANT-fused protein at room
temperature for 15 min in a binding buffer concentration: 50 mM HEPES-KOH [pH
7.5], 375 mM KCl, 6.25 mM MgCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mg/mL BSA, Glycerol 25%).
Each 20 ml to bind reaction contained 25 fmol biotin-labeled probes and 5 mg
protein, and 1 mg Poly(dIdC) was supplemented to the reaction for minimizing
nonspecific interactions. And then, we analyzed the reaction products via using 8.0 %
native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was performed at 100 V
for approximately 1-2 h in TGE buffer (containing 12.5 mM Tris, 95 mM glycin, and
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
0.5 mM EDTA at pH 8.3, precooled at -12°C). The DNA fragments on the gel were
transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane with 0.5XTBE at 100 V (~400 mA) for 50
min at 4°C. With cross-linking the transferred DNA to the membrane, the membrane
was incubated in the blocking buffer for 20-30 min under gently shaking, then
transferred to a conjugate/blocking buffer by mixing 33.3 ml stabilized
Streptavidin-Horseradish Peroxidase Conjugate with 10 ml blocking buffer according
to the manufacturer’s protocol. The membrane was washed 4-6 times for 5 min each
with a washing buffer. Biotin-labeled DNA was detected using the chemiluminescent
method in terms of the manufacturer’s protocol.
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof Hong Gil Nam (DGSIT, Korea) and Cheng-Bin Xiang (University of
Science and Technology of China, China) for their support during the initial stage of
this work. ant-KO (SALK-022770) and 35S:ANT [ant-KO (SALK-022770) and
35S:ANT seeds were kindly provided by Prof. H.G. Nam (DGSIT, Korea)]. sos1,
sos2, sos3 and scabp8 seeds were kindly provided by Prof. Y. Guo (Agricultural
University of China, China).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests
Author contributions
L.S. Meng designed experiments. L.S. Meng performed the experiments. L.S. Meng,
S.Q Yao and Y.B Wang completed statistical analysis of data. L.S. Meng and A.Z
Liu wrote, edited and revised this manuscript.
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Funding
We are grateful for National Key Basic Research Program of China (Grant No.
2014CB954100) and National Key Technology R & D Program (2015BAD15B02).
This research was also supported by ‘QingLan’ Talent Engineering Funds by Tianshui
Normal University”.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material available online.
References
Bassil, E., Tajima, H., Liang, Y.C., Ohto, M., Ushijima,K., Nakano,R., Esumi, T., Coku,A.,
Belmonte, M., and Blumwald E. (2011). The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2
control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction.
Plant Cell, 23: 3482–3497.
Benkova E., Michniewicz M., Sauer M., Teichmann T., Seifertova D., Jurgens G. & Friml J.
2003. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell
115, 591–602.
Chen J-G., Shimomura S., Sitbon F., Sandberg G. & Jones A.M. 2001. The role of auxin-binding
protein 1 in the expansion of tobacco leaf cells. Plant J. 28: 607–617.
Catala, R., Ouyang, J., Abreu, I.A., Hu, Y., Seo, H., Zhang, X., and Chua., N.H.
(2007).The Arabidopsis E3 SUMO Ligase SIZ1 Regulates Plant Growth and Drought Responses.
Plant Cell, 19: 2952–2966.
Elliott RC., Betzner AS., Huttner E., Oakes MP., Tucker WQ., Gerentes D., Perez P. & Smyth
DR. 1996. AINTEGUMENTA, an APETALA2-like gene of Arabidopsis with pleiotropic roles in
ovule development and floral organ growth. Plant Cell 8, 155–168.
Eshed Y., Baum SF & Bowman JL. 1999. Distinct mechanisms promote polarity establishment in
carpels of Arabidopsis. Cell 99, 199–209.
Halfter U., Ishitani M. & Zhu J-K. 2000. The Arabidopsis SOS2 protein kinase physically interacts
with and is activated by the calcium-binding protein SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,
3735–3740.
Hernandez, A., Jiang, X.Y., Cubero, B., Nieto, P.M., Bressan, R.A., Hasegawa, P.M., and Pardo,
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
J.M. (2009). Mutants of the Arabidopsis thaliana cation/H+ antiporter AtNHX1 conferring
increased salt tolerance in yeast. The endosome/prevacuolar compartment is a target for salt toxicity.
J. Biol. Chem. 284: 14276–14285.
Horiguchi, G., Kim, G.T. and Tsukaya, H. (2005) The transcription factor AtGRF5 and the
transcription coactivator AN3 regulate cell proliferation in leaf primordia of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant Journal 43, 68–78.
Horstman A., Willemsen V., Boutilier K. & Heidstra R. 2014. AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE proteins:
hubs in a plethora of networks. Trends in Plant Science 19(3): 146-157.
Kim BG., Waadt R., Cheong YH., Pandey GK., Dominguez-Solis JR., Schu¨ ltke S., Lee SC.,
Kudla J. & Luan S. 2007. The calcium sensor CBL10 mediates salt tolerance by regulating ion
homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 52 (3), 473–484.
Kim, J.H. and Kende, H. (2004) A transcriptional coactivator, AtGIF1, is involved in regulating leaf
growth and morphology in Arabidopsis. Pro Nat Aca Sci 101, 13374-13379.
Klucher KM., Chow H., Reiser L., & Fischer RL. 1996. The AINTEGUMENTA gene of Arabidopsis
required for ovule and female gametophyte development is related to the floral homeotic gene
APETALA2. Plant Cell 8, 137–153.
Krizek BA. 1999. Ectopic expression of AINTEGUMENTA gene results in increased growth of floral
organs. Dev Genet 25, 224–236.
Krizek BA. 2003. AINTEGUMENTA utilizes a mode of DNA recognition distinct from that used by
proteins containing a single AP2 domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1859–1868.
Krizek BA. 2009. AINTEGUMENTA and AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE6 Act Redundantly to Regulate
Arabidopsis Floral Growth and Patterning. Plant Physiology. 150: 1916–1929.
Lei ZY., Zhao P., Cao MJ., Cui R., Chen X. & et al. 2007. High-throughput binary vectors for plant
gene function analysis. J Integr Plant Biol 49, 556–567.
Liu J & Zhu J-K. 1998. A calcium sensor homolog required for plant salt tolerance. Science 280,
1943–1945.
Meng, L.S. (2015) Transcription Coactivator Arabidopsis ANGUSTIFOLIA3 Modulates Anthocyanin
Accumulation and Light-Induced Root Elongation through Transrepression of Constitutive
Photomorphogenic1.Plant, Cell&Envir. 38: 838-851.
Meng, L.S and Yao, S.Q. (2015). Transcription co-activator Arabidopsis ANGUSTIFOLIA3 (AN3)
regulates water-use efficiency and drought tolerance by modulating stomatal density and improving
root architecture by the transrepression of YODA (YDA). Plant Biotechnol. J.,
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12324. [Epub ahead of print].
Mizukami Y. & Fischer RL. 2000. Plant organ size control: AINTEGUMENTA regulates growth and
cell numbers during organogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 942–947.
Nole-Wilson S. & Krizek BA. 2000. DNA binding properties of the Arabidopsis floral development
protein AINTEGUMENTA. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 4076–4082.
Qiu QS., Guo Y., Dietrich MA., Schumaker KS. & Zhu J-K. 2002. Regulation of SOS1, a plasma
membrane Na þ/H exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 99, 8436–8441.
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Quan R., Lin H., Mendoza I., Zhang Y., Cao W., Yang Y., Shang M., Chen S., Pardo JM & Guo
Y. 2007. SCABP8/CBL10, a putative calcium sensor, interacts with the protein kinase SOS2 to
protect Arabidopsis shoots from salt stress. Plant Cell 19, 1415–1431.
Quintero FJ., Ohta M., Shi H., Zhu J-K & Pardo JM. 2002. Reconstitution in yeast of the
Arabidopsis SOS signaling pathway for Naþ homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,
9061–9066.
Shi H., Ishitani M., Kim C-S & Zhu J-K. 2000. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1
encodes a putative Na þ/H antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6896–6901.
Stockinger EJ., Gilmour SJ. & Thomashow MF. 1997. Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2
domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA
regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1035–1040.
Ulmasov T., Murfett J., Hagen G. & Guilfoyle, T.J. 1997. Aux/ IAA proteins repress expression of
reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell 9,
1963–1971.
Wang L., Hua D., He J., Duan Y., Chen Z & et al. 2011. Auxin Response Factor2 (ARF2) and its
regulated homeodomain gene HB33 mediate abscisic acid response in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 7,
e1002172.
Yoo CY., Pence HE., Jin JB., Miura K., Gosney MJ., Hasegawa PM. & Mickelbart MV. 2010.
The Arabidopsis GTL1 transcription factor regulates water use efficiency and drought tolerance by
modulating stomatal density via transrepression of SDD1. Plant Cell 22, 4128–4141.
Yu H., Chen X., Hong YY., Wang Y., Xu P. & et al. 2008. Activated expression of an Arabidopsis
HD-START protein confers drought tolerance with improved root system and reduced stomatal
density. Plant Cell 20, 1134–1151.
Zhang XR., Henriques R., Lin SS., Niu QW. & Chua NH. 2006. Agrobacterium-mediated
transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat Protoc 1, 641–646.
Zhou, L.Z., Li, S., Feng, Q.N., Zhang, Y.L., Zhao, X.Y., Zeng, Y.L., Wang, Jiang, L.W., Zhang Y.
(2013). PROTEIN S-ACYL TRANSFERASE10 Is Critical for Development and Salt Tolerance in
Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 25: 1093–1107.
Zhu J-K., Liu J. & Xiong L. 1998. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis: Evidence for a
critical role of potassium nutrition. Plant Cell 10, 1181–1192.
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Figures
Figure 1. ANT Expression Analysis.
Expression of ANT pro:GUS in 4-day-old young leaf blades (A), veins (B), pollen and stamens (C),
stem veins (D), siliques (E), pistils (F), root mature zone (G) and root tips (H).
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Figure 2. ant-KO (KO-knock out)seedlings showed resistance to salt stress.
Seedlings were grown on solid MS medium without NaCl for 5 days and were then transferred to solid
MS medium with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM NaCl for 15 days.
(A). Representative 20-day-old ant-KO, wild-type (Col-0) and 35S:ANT seedlings grown on solid MS
medium with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM NaCl for 15 days. Magnification is the same for each image.
(B), (C), (D) and (E). Bar graph exhibiting the differences in primary root length (B), lateral root
number (C), shoot fresh weight (D) and root fresh weight (E) between the 20-day-old ant-KO,
wild-type (Col-0) and 35S:ANT seedlings grown on solid MS medium with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM
NaCl for 15 days. Error bars represent SD (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05; n=15).
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Figure 3. ant-KO and 35S:ANT seedlings showed different response from the wild type (Col-0) to KCl
or LiCl.
Seedlings were grown on solid MS medium without NaCl for 5 days and were then transferred to solid
MS medium with 10 mM LiCl or 100 mM KCl for 15 days.
(A). Representative 20-day-old ant-KO (a), wild-type (Col-0) (b) and 35S:ANT (c) seedlings grown on
solid MS medium with 100 mM KCl for 15 days. Representative 20-day-old ant-KO (d), wild-type
(Col-0) (e) and 35S:ANT (f) seedlings grown on solid MS medium with 10 mM LiCl for 15 days.
Magnification is the same for each image. Bars= 2.0cm for (a) to (f).
(B), (C) and (D). Bar graph exhibiting the differences in primary root length (B), lateral root number
(C) and shoot fresh weight (D) between the 20-day-old ant-KO, wild-type (Col-0) and 35S:ANT
seedlings grown on solid MS medium with 100 mM KCl or 10 mM LiCl. Error bars represent SD (*P
< 0.05; n=15).
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Figure 4. ANT negatively regulates SCABP8 at the transcript level.
(A). Bar graph exhibiting the differences of the expression levels of SOS1, SOS2, SOS3 and SCABP8 in
15-day-old ant-KO, wild-type (Col-0) and 35S:ANT seedlings grown under white light conditions.
Error bars represent SD (***P < 0.001,*P < 0.05; n=3). At least five independently propagated lines
were used for each seedling type, and the wild type was set as 1.0. Quantifications were normalized to
the expression of UBQ5. Error bars represent SD (n=3).
(B).Bar graph exhibiting the differences of expression of ANT between wild-type (Col-0), sos1, sos2,
sos3 and scabp8 seedlings grown under white light conditions.
(C). Schematic of the SCABP8 promoter loci and their amplicons for ChIP analysis.
Several amplicons in the SCABP8 promoter were used for ChIP analyses. Additionally, S1 contains
the ANT associating consensus sequences (gCAC(A/G)N(A/T)TcCC(a/g)ANG(c/t)). S1, S2 and S3
indicate different three regaions in SCABP8 promoter.
(D) and (E). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis. Enrichment of particular SCABP8
chromatin regions with anti-HA antibodies (as a control) or anti-GFP antibodies in 35S:ANT:HA
transgenic shoots (E) and roots (F) as detected by real-time PCR analysis. Quantifications were
normalized to the expression of UBQ5. Error bars represent SD (n=3). Input was set as 100%.
(G). Expression of NHX1, NHX4, NHX5 and NHX6 in Col-0 and 35S:ANT seedlings.
(A). Bar graph exhibiting the differences of the expression levels of NHX1, NHX4, NHX5 and NHX6 in
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
15-day-old wild-type (Col-0) and 35S:ANT seedlings grown under white light conditions. Error bars
represent SD (n=3). At least five independently propagated lines were used for each seedling type, and
the wild type was set as 1.0. Quantifications were normalized to the expression of UBQ5. Error bars
represent SD (n=3).
Figure 5. Gel shift analysis
(A) and (C). Gel shift analysis of ANT protein associating to cis-elements in the promoter of SCABP8.
The oligonucleotide sequences of the probe and the mutated form of the probe (mProbe) within the
SCABP8 promoter used in the EMSA. Underlined letters in blue indicate the sequences of the
ANT-recognition motifs. mProbe: ANT-recognition motifs in the probe were mutated as indicated by
big letters.
(B). Unlabeled SCABP8 promoter (2 µg) was used as a competitor to determine the specificity of
DNA-binding activity for ANT.
(D). The mutant version of the SCABP8 promoter (CC/GG) was labeled with biotin and used for
EMSA with ANT polypeptides.
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Figure 6. SCABP8 Mutation Suppresses the ant-KO Mutant Phenotype.
(A). Seedlings were grown on solid MS medium without NaCl for 5 days and were then transferred to
solid MS medium with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM NaCl for 15 days.
(B). Bar graph exhibiting the differences in primary root length between the indicated 20-day-old
seedlings grown on solid MS medium with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM NaCl. Error bars represent SD
(**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05; n=12).
(C). Bar graph exhibiting the differences in shoot fresh weight between the indicated 20-day-old
seedlings grown on solid MS medium with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM NaCl.Error bars represent SD
(**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05; n=12).
(D). Bar graph exhibiting the differences in root fresh weight between the indicated 20-day-old
seedlings grown on solid MS medium with 75 mM NaCl or 100 mM NaCl. Error bars represent SD
(**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05; n=12).
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t
Figure 7. Salt stress induces downregulation of ANT. ANT associates directly to the SCABP8
promoter and causes the upregulation of SCABP8, thereby inducing salt stress tolerance in the plant. In
vitro, SOS3 physically interacts with and activates an Ser/Thr protein kinase, SOS2. Among the
downstream targets of the SOS3-SOS2 complex is SOS1, a plasma membrane–localized sodium/proton
antiporter (Shi et al., 2000; Qiu et al., 2002; Quintero et al., 2002). SCABP8/CBL10, a putative
calcium sensor, interacts with the protein kinase SOS2 to protect Arabidopsis shoots from salt stress
(Quan et al., 2007).
Jour
nal o
f Cel
l Sci
ence
Acc
epte
d m
anus
crip
t