arc pool v bartels mo

Upload: mario-kenny

Post on 05-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    1/57

    1

    INTHECIRCUITCOURTOFTHETENTHJUDICIALCIRCUITOFTHESTATEOFFLORIDAINANDFORPOLKCOUNTY

    ARCPOOLI,LLC,AMARYLANDLIMITEDLIABILITYCOMPANY,

    Plaintiff,

    vs.CASENO.532009CA0124518

    GARYBARTELS;YVONNEBARTELS,ETAL,

    Defendants._____________________________________/

    HEARINGHELDONFEBRUARY17,2012

    BEFORETHEHONORABLESTEVENL.SELPH

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    2/57

    2

    DATE:February17,2012

    TIME:9:14a.m.-10:14a.m.

    PLACE:Pol

    CountyCourthouse255NorthBroadwayAvenueHearingRoom7D1Bartow,Florida

    APPEARANCES:MARKC.ELIA,ESQUIREVanNessLawFirm,P.A.1239EastNewportCenterDriveSuite110DeerfieldBeach,Florida33442ForthePlaintiff(Appearingtelephonically)

    MICHAELF.SINGER,ESQUIREKorte&Wortman,P.A.3001ExecutiveDriveSuite300

    Clearwater,Florida33762FortheDefendants

    ALSOPRESENT:GARYBARTELS

    REPORTER:MELODYOTHIENO========================================================I-N-D-E-X

    February17,2012

    HEARING........................................3

    REPORTER'SCERTIFICATE........................56

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    3/57

    3

    1Thereupon,thefollowingproceedingswerehadand

    2ta

    en:

    3THECOURT:Thisisyourmotionforsummary

    4judgment,Ibelieve;isthatright?

    5MR.ELIA:Yes,sir,itis.

    6THECOURT:O

    ay.Letmestartoutbyas

    ing

    7Mr.Singer,onbehalfofthedefendant,if--if

    8youallareopposingamotionforsummaryjudgment?

    9MR.SINGER:Weare,YourHonor.

    10Andbeforeplaintiffbegins,I'mnotsure

    11whetherthecourthasjurisdictiontohearthe

    12matterbecausethere'sbeenaFinalDisposition

    13FormenteredonApril7th,statingthatthe

    14matter'sbeendisposedofbythejudge.

    15THECOURT:Really?

    16MR.SINGER:Yes,YourHonor.

    17THECOURT:O

    ay.Well--well,didit

    18indicatewhatthedispositionwas?

    19MR.SINGER:Itjust--itdoesnot.

    20THECOURT:Well,theyhavesubmitteda--a

    21proposedonetogoinwiththisjudgmenthere.It

    22saysdisposedbyjudge.Butyou'resayingitgot

    23filedpreviously?Theypreviouslyfileda

    24dispositionform?

    25MR.SINGER:Yes,sir,YourHonor.There'sa

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    4/57

    4

    1form,1.998,FinalDispositionForm,withinthe

    2courtrecordinthisfiledatedApril7th,2011,

    3statingthatthe--therehasbeenameansoffinal

    4disposition.Andtheboxmar

    eddisposedbyjudge

    5hasanXthroughit.

    6THECOURT:Isthereajudgmenttogowithit

    7orsome

    indof--somethingelse--someorderof

    8judgmentthatgoesalong--theywerefiledatthe

    9sametime?

    10MR.SINGER:Thereisnot,YourHonor.There

    11wasasettlementagreementwhichwasreached--

    12THECOURT:Oh.

    13MR.SINGER:--bac then.Ibelievethatwas

    14the--why--thatmighthavebeentheground

    15supportingthedisposition.

    16THECOURT:Huh.Soundsli

    ea--soundsli

    e

    17amista

    etome,unlesstherewasanorderof

    18dismissal--ornoticeofvoluntarilydismissal

    19thatwentalongwithit.Idon't

    nowwhythere

    20wouldbeafinaldispositiononasettlementuntil

    21there'ssomethingindicatingthatthecasewas

    22dismissed.

    23Mister--

    24MR.ELIA:Elia.Yes,sir.It'smy

    25understanding--

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    5/57

    5

    1THECOURT:--Elia,canyou--canyou

    2commentonthat?

    3MR.ELIA:--there'sbeenany--there'sbeen

    4novoluntarilydismissalandthere'sbeennofinal

    5judgmententeredinthiscase.That'swhywe're

    6tryingtogetthefinaljudgmententeredtoday,

    7YourHonor.

    8THECOURT:Idon't

    nowifsomebodysentina

    9FinalDispositionFormwithsomeotherdocumentsby

    10mista

    eorwhateverand--ofcourse,thecler

    's

    11goingtofileitifitcomesin.

    12Iwasgoingtoloo

    ituponmycomputer.I

    13don'thaveit--havethiscasenumberloggedup--

    14loggedonthereyet.Letmejustdothat.Ican

    15loo andseeifIcanfindanythinginthecourt

    16filethatwouldindicateanactualfinal

    17dispositionotherthana--somethingrepresenting

    18thatthere'sbeenafinaldisposition.Ithin

    the

    19FinalDispositionFormmightthrowoff--maycause

    20astatisticalerror,butI'mnotsurereally--I

    21don'tthin

    Iwouldta

    ethattomeanthatthecase

    22isactuallyfinallydisposedof.That'sreally

    23justadeviceforrecording--

    24MR.ELIA:YourHonor--

    25THECOURT:--caseloadsandallthat.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    6/57

    6

    1MR.ELIA:I'msorrytointerrupt,sir.

    2OpposingcounselwasreferencingaFinal

    3DispositionFormshowingdoc

    etedonApril7thof

    42011.Isthatthedate?

    5THECOURT:Isthattheoneyou'rereferring

    6to,Mr.Singer?

    7MR.SINGER:ThatistheoneI'mreferringto.

    8THECOURT:Yes.

    9MR.SINGER:Doc eted--

    10MR.ELIA:There'sa--acalendarentry

    11deletedforthatsamedateat9:00a.m.,Your

    12Honor.Soit'smyunderstanding--actually,there

    13wasa--amotionforsummaryjudgmentsetforthat

    14day.SothatwasaFinalDispositionFormprovided

    15tothecourtortothecler inadvanceofamotion

    16forsummaryjudgmentsetforthatday.Soit'smy

    17understandingitwasdoc

    etedinerror.

    18THECOURT:Ithin

    that'swhathappened.In

    19fact,youhaveaFinalDispositionFormwiththis

    20pac

    etIhaveherenowforthesamereason.

    21MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    22THECOURT:And--and,Iguess,somebody--

    23itgotfiledorgotdoc

    etedwiththecler

    by

    24mista

    e.Andthecler

    --you'resayingthatthe

    25cler

    deletedit.Showsit'sbeingdeletedafter

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    7/57

    7

    1that.Andtherewasnosummaryjudgmententeredor

    2noother--nootheractualdisposition.SoI

    3don'tthin

    thatdeprivesthecourtof

    4jurisdiction.Ithin

    wecangoforwardwiththis

    5motionforsummaryjudgmenthearing.

    6Mr.Elia,doyouwanttoaddressyourmotion

    7atthispoint?

    8MR.ELIA:Yes.Than

    you,sir.Mayit

    9pleasethecourt.

    10Thisisaloanwhichispastdueforquite

    11sometime.Wehavefiledtheoriginalnoteand

    12mortgagewiththecourt.I'mloo

    ingforthe

    13filingdate.

    14THECOURT:I'mgoingtoloo

    ituptoojust

    15so--unfortunately,this--whenwedothisgroup

    16doc

    etwherewegroupabunchofcasestogether

    17li

    ethis,thecler

    'sofficedoesn'tlistthe

    18casesautomaticallyonmycomputerversionofthe

    19courtcalendar.Ihavetojustloo

    themupby

    20casenumber,andI'mgoingtogoaheadanddothat

    21nowwhileyou'retal

    ingandwhileyou'reloo

    ing

    22foryour--

    23MR.ELIA:Allright,sir.

    24THECOURT:--information.

    25MR.ELIA:Theoriginalnoteandmortgagewere

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    8/57

    8

    1filedbac

    onApril19thof2010.Andthefiling

    2ofthosedocumentsshowsthatplaintiffisthe

    3properpartywithauthoritytosueonthisloan.

    4Wefiledtheappropriatesupportingaffidavits

    5showingtheamountdueonthisloan.Wehaven't

    6receivedanyaffidavitsinoppositiontoourmotion

    7sayingthatanythingis--orcreatinganyissueof

    8factwhichwouldprevententryofsummaryjudgment

    9today.

    10So--and,Ibelieve,thatweprovidedthe

    11courtwiththeproposedfinaljudgmentformwhich

    12showsthe--thetotalamountdueof$383,324.14.

    13Andthatincludestheattorney--attorneyfee

    14amountof$1,300,whichIthin

    isreasonablefor

    15thiscase.

    16Than

    you,Judge.

    17THECOURT:O

    ay.I--Inotethatyouall

    18filedanamendedaffidavitofindebtedness,I

    19guess,toupdatethosenumbersfollowingthe

    20previouslyfiledmotionforsummaryjudgmentto

    21updatefor--

    22MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.That'sstandard

    23practice.

    24THECOURT:O

    ay.Allright.What's

    25defendants'positionthen?

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    9/57

    9

    1MR.SINGER:BeforeIbeginmyargument,canI

    2inquireastothatamendedaffidavitof

    3indebtednessthatyoujustreferredtobecauseI

    4wasn'tseeingthatonthecourt'sdoc

    et?

    5THECOURT:O

    ay.Ijust--Ijusthappened

    6toseeitwhenIwasscrollingthrough--

    7MR.SINGER:Iwasn'tawarethatithadbeen

    8filed20daysbeforetoday.

    9THECOURT:Letmesee.Itshowsafiling

    10dateofDecember1,2011.Andthecler

    stamp

    11showsDecember1,2011.It'sentitledAmended

    12AffidavitofIndebtedness.SignedbyJohnC.

    13Murphy.Let'ssee.It'sthreepageslong.Four,

    14actually.It'sgotsomeattachmentswithit.So

    15it'sfairlylengthywithalltheexhibitsthatare

    16attachedtoit.

    17Icanprintyouoffacopy.Justthe--

    18withouttheexhibitsorsomethingifyouwantthat.

    19MR.SINGER:Iwouldappreciatethat,Your

    20Honor.

    21THECOURT:O

    ay.IsayIcan.Letmeseeif

    22Icandothat.Itta

    estheprinteraminuteto--

    23todothat.It's--butitwill--itshouldstart

    24printinghereinamoment.

    25MR.SINGER:Inthemeantime,Icanaddress

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    10/57

    10

    1otherarguments--

    2THECOURT:O

    ay.

    3MR.SINGER:--notrelatedtothataffidavit.

    4THECOURT:Allright.

    5MR.SINGER:Allright.Than

    you,Your

    6Honor.

    7Thefirstargumentthatwehaveisthat

    8plaintiffdoesnothavetheauthority,underthe

    9statutes,tomaintainthisaction.Specifically,

    10Statute607.1502,aspertainingtotheconsequences

    11oftransactingbusinesswithoutauthority.

    12Plaintiff,inthisaction,isaforeign

    13corporation.They'reestablishedinMaryland,as

    14theircase--asthe--asthecasewouldindicate

    15thattheyareaMarylandLimitedLiabilityCompany.

    16Andthey'vealsofileda--theircostbondfurther

    17affirmthattheyarenotaresidentofthestate.

    18TheFloridaDivisionofCorporationsdoesnot

    19indicatethatthisorganization,ARCPoolI,has

    20anysortofcertificateofauthoritytotransact

    21businessinthestate,suchasacquiringinterest

    22inpropertiesandnegotiatingwithhomeowners.As

    23such,thestatuteprovidesthataforeign

    24corporationtransactingbusinessinthestate

    25withoutacertificateofauthoritymaynotmaintain

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    11/57

    11

    1aproceedinginany--inthestateuntilit

    2obtainssuchcertificateofauthority.Ifthe

    3courtfeelsthatadeterminationisneededasto

    4whetheraforeigncorporationoritssuccessoror

    5assigneeis--ifthecourtneedstodetermine

    6whethersuchcorporationrequiresacertificateof

    7authority,thecourtmaystaytheactionuntilit

    8sodetermines.Andifitsodetermines,thecourt

    9mayfurtherstaytheproceedinguntiltheforeign

    10corporationoritssuccessorobtainstheir

    11certificate.

    12Ihavea--acopyof--

    13THECOURT:Didyouraisethatasadefensein

    14thiscase?

    15MR.ELIA:YourHonor,thisisthefirstI've

    16heardof--ofthis.Hastherebeenanything

    17filed,some

    indofamemorandumoranything,

    18outlininganyofthis?BecauseI'mbeingambushed.

    19THECOURT:That'swhyIas

    edifthishas

    20beenraisedasadefenseatsomepoint.

    21MR.SINGER:Itwasnot,YourHonor.

    22Plaintiff'spre--Imean,defendants'previous

    23counseldidnotsoraiseit.We'vejustrecently

    24comeintothecaseonbehalfofthedefendant.But

    25webelievethatitisavalidargumentthatthe

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    12/57

    12

    1statute--

    2THECOURT:O

    ay.Doyouhaveother--or

    3here'sthecopyoftheamendedaffidavit.It--

    4it--theprinter,forsomereason,printedafew

    5pagesoftheexhibit.I--Ias

    editjustto

    6printtheaffidavititself,butitdidprintafew

    7otheradditionalpages.

    8MR.SINGER:ButI'llalsoaddressourother

    9argumentswhichIraisedbytheaffirmative

    10answers.Thefirstisthatplaintiffdoesnothave

    11standing.They'veindicatedthatthenote--

    12possessionofthenote,whichhasbeenfiled,

    13whetherornotthat'soriginal,Ibelieve,is--is

    14aquestionoffact.

    15THECOURT:Wasthe--hasthe--letmeas

    16thattoclarify.Hastheoriginalnoteand

    17mortgagefilebeenfiledinthecourtfile?

    18MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.Theywerefiledbac

    on

    19April19thof2010.

    20THECOURT:Well,Iwould--thatwouldseem

    21toindicatetheyhadpossessionofitiftheywere

    22abletofileit.

    23MR.SINGER:Theirpossession,Iwassaying,

    24wasn'tthequestion.Thequestioniswhetherit's

    25anoriginal.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    13/57

    13

    1But,furthermore,the--thenotehasnot

    2mentionedtheplaintiffthatisnotendorsedin

    3blan

    orspecificallyendorsedtotheplaintiff.

    4Therewasanendorsementonthenotemadebythe

    5originalpayee,Ban

    UnitedFSB.However,they

    6voided--theyhad--supposedlyhadachangeof

    7mindbecausethatendorsementandblan

    isvoided,

    8andthuspossessionofthenotealonetowhich

    9plaintiffisn'tapartynorhasablan endorsement

    10oraspecificendorsementperthe--thecaseof

    11Riggs.Holdonaminute.Letmegetthat.

    12THECOURT:I'm--I'mloo

    --tryingtoloo

    13forthenoteherejustasecondwhileyou'redoing

    14that.

    15MR.SINGER:Allright.The--thecaseof--

    16MR.ELIA:That'strue,YourHonor.There--

    17on--onthelastpageofthenote,therewasan

    18endorsementstampwhichwasstruc

    through.It

    19saidpaytotheorderofblan

    withoutrecourse

    20Ban

    UnitedFSB.SignedbyMireyaFoster,Assistant

    21VicePresident.Andshesignedit.It'sstruc

    22throughwiththewordvoidinboldlettersontop.

    23Myunderstandingisthatmayhaveta

    en

    24place--thisisjustaguess--becauseBan

    United

    25FSBceasedtoexistwhenitwasta

    enoverbythe

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    14/57

    14

    1FDIC.

    2Myofficefiledtheassignmentofmortgage

    3signedbyBillWilliams,allegedpresidentof

    4Ban

    UnitedassigneeofFDICasreceiverfor

    5Ban

    UnitedFSB.That'sattachedtoourplaintiff's

    6replytoaffirmativedefensesfiledbydefendants

    7GaryBartelsandYvonneBartels.Wefiledthat

    8bac

    inlateSeptemberorearlyOctoberof2010.

    9Well,thisargumentwhich--whichnewdefense

    10counselisraisingwasaddressedroughlyayearand

    11ahalfago,andit'sinthecourtrecordthere.

    12I'mloo

    ingforthe--thefilingdateasIreplied

    13toaffirmativedefenses.

    14THECOURT:Iseeit.

    15MR.SINGER:Butasplaintiffisreferencing,

    16thisassignmentwasnotdonebythe--theoriginal

    17lenders.Notdonebythepayee,Ban

    UnitedFSB.

    18ItwasdonebyanassigneeofBan

    UnitedFSB.The

    19entity

    nownasBan

    United,aseparateentity.

    20MR.ELIA:That'strue,YourHonor.That's

    21because,asamatterofpublicrecord,Ban

    United

    22FSBfailed.Weattached--ifyouloo

    atthepage

    23justbelowtheassignmentunderneathourreply

    24there,you'llseetheFDIC'spublicwebsite

    25informationandthe--theNationalInformation

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    15/57

    15

    1Center'shistoryonBan

    UnitedFSBshowingthatit

    2failed.Andthatwasin2009.Theassetswere

    3transferredbytheFDICintothenewentity

    4Ban

    United.Andthat'swhythe--thesigneron

    5thatassignmentisBillWilliams,thevice

    6presidentofBan

    United,assigneeoftheFDICas

    7receiverforBan

    UnitedF--FSB.

    8Mr.Williamstransferredownershipofthis

    9loanintoARCPoolI,LLC,whichisthecurrent

    10plaintiffinthiscase.That'swhymyclienthad

    11theoriginalnoteandmortgageandthat'swhywe

    12fileditinthecase.

    13THECOURT:O ay.Well,let'sseeif

    14Mr.Singerhasanyotherissueshewantstoraise.

    15MR.SINGER:Ido,YourHonor.Justthecase

    16ofGeeversusUnitedStatesBan

    National

    17Associationastrustee.It'sa2011case.Idon't

    18havetheciteforit,unfortunately,buthere'sa

    19copy.LetmehandyouacopyIdidn't--letme

    20figureoutwhichcopyIdidn'tnotate.

    21Istillthin

    thatthere's--thereare

    22questionsoflaw.Infact,the--thearguments

    23thatplaintiff'sstating,Idon'tbelievethat

    24you--there'sbeenanyjudicialnoticeestablished

    25astoban

    --whetherthis--thiswasorwasnot

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    16/57

    16

    1transferredtoBan

    United.Andunderthecaselaw

    2thatIjustcited,the--asasummaryjudgment

    3hearingwheretheplaintifffailedtoofferany

    4proofoftheassignee'sauthoritytoassignthe

    5mortgagethatthe--thecourtconcludedthatit

    6failedtoestablishitsstandingtobringthe

    7foreclosureactionasamatteroflaw.I--I

    8don't--Idon'tbelievethatthe--the--the

    9lin betweenBan UnitedFSBandBan Unitedhasbeen

    10sufficientlyestablished.

    11AndI'dalsoli etocallthecourt's

    12attentiontothetechnicaladmissionsinthis

    13action.Therewasarequestforadmissionsserved

    14onJanuary27,2011,towhichplaintifffailedto

    15respondandthusthe--theadmissionsaredeemed

    16admittedpursuanttoRule1.370.Anddefendanthas

    17beenrelyingonthoseadmissionsupandtothis

    18point.Andthoseadmissionsincludethatthe

    19plaintiffdidnotownorholdtheirnote--the

    20plaintiffdidnotownorholdthenoteand/or

    21mortgageonNovember13th,2009,thedaythe

    22complaintwasfiled.Theplaintiffdidnotgive

    23thepre-accelerationnotice,asrequiredbythe

    24mortgage,whichisdefendants'secondaffirmative

    25defenseandtoprerequisiteconditiontoany

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    17/57

    17

    1entitlementtoenforcetheforeclosure.Number

    2fourisadmitthat--plaintiffadmitsthatthey

    3werenotauthorizedtoenforcethenoteontheday

    4thecomplaintwasfiled.Thatasettlementwas

    5reachedinmediation.Thatthemediationagreement

    6wasthefullandcompletesettlementagreement,and

    7thatplaintiffhasrefusedtocomplywiththe

    8settlementagreementreachedinmediation.

    9THECOURT:O ay.Well--

    10MR.ELIA:Idon'tsee--I'mloo

    ingherefor

    11any--anyadmissions,YourHonor.Idon'tseeany

    12onthedoc

    et.

    13THECOURT:Iwasjustloo ingfortherequest

    14foradmissionstoseeifithadbeenfiled,and

    15it--andithadnotbeenrespondedto.Itcould

    16bedeemedasadmitted.

    17MR.SINGER:ThecopyIobtainedisfromthe

    18courtfile.It'sdatedJanuary27th,2011.It's

    19beeninthecourtfileforoverayear.

    20Certificateofservice--

    21MR.ELIA:Januaryof--let'ssee--2011.

    22MR.SINGER:Certificateofserviceindicates

    23itwasserveduponVanNessLawFirmandReal

    24Management,LLC,anotherparty.

    25THECOURT:Well,Isee,onJanuary27,an

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    18/57

    18

    1entryforaletterfromattorney'sofficeregarding

    2amotionforsummaryjudgment.OnJanuary28th,I

    3seeanoticeoffilingdefendants'consentto

    4substitutionofcounsel.

    5MR.SINGER:Itmaybeinpartofthat

    6January31stfilings,theletterfromattorney's

    7office.

    8THECOURT:Allright.Let'sseewhatthat

    9shows.

    10MR.SINGER:But,asIsaid,Iobtainedthis

    11fromthecourtfile,thecopythatIhaveinfront

    12ofme.

    13THECOURT:O ay.I'm indofinterestedto

    14discussthatsettlementagreement.Hasthere--

    15hastherebeenanagreementto--thatwouldserve

    16asanovationorasettlementofthisnoteand

    17mortgage--

    18MR.ELIA:Let'ssee.

    19THECOURT:--orwouldhavereplacedit

    20with--inthenewagreement?

    21MR.ELIA:I'mloo

    ingataforbearance

    22agreement.Let'ssee.

    23THECOURT:Igatherit'snotfiledinthe

    24recordinthiscase,butit--butit--

    25MR.ELIA:Wasitfiled,sir?I'msorry.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    19/57

    19

    1THECOURT:IsaidIgatheritwasnotfiled

    2unless--inthe--inthecourtfileaspartof

    3therecord,but,obviously,thepartiesdidreach

    4anagreementthatraisesanissueherethatImight

    5needtoconsider.

    6MR.SINGER:Idon'tbelievethatthere's

    7evidenceofthesettlementagreementwithinthe

    8courtrecord.There'sjustplaintiff'sadmission

    9thatasettlementagreementwasreachedat

    10mediation.Thatthemediationagreementwasthe

    11fullandcompletesettlementagreement.And

    12admissionnumbersixstatesthatthetermsprovided

    13intheforbearanceagreementaredifferentthanthe

    14termsagreedtointhemediationsettlement

    15agreement.And--

    16MR.ELIA:I'mloo

    ingatasignedforbearance

    17agreement,YourHonor--

    18THECOURT:Well,o

    ay.

    19MR.ELIA:--signedApril7thof2011.

    20THECOURT:Whichisaroundthesametimethat

    21FinalDispositionFormthatweweretal

    ingabout

    22earlierwasfiled.

    23MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.I'mloo

    ingbac

    intomy

    24notestoseewhat--whatthestoryis,sir.

    25THECOURT:O

    ay.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    20/57

    20

    1MR.ELIA:Yes,YourHonor,thatagreementwas

    2signed,andthatcausedthatcancellationofthat

    3April7thhearing.

    4THECOURT:O

    ay.So--

    5MR.ELIA:I'mloo

    ing--

    6THECOURT:--isthat--isthatafinal

    7resolutionand--Idon't

    nowwhatthetermsof

    8theagreementwere.Wasit--

    9MR.ELIA:No,sir.Yeah,it's--ithasn't

    10beenfiledsothetermsofitareconfidentialis

    11myunderstanding.

    12THECOURT:O

    ay.Bytheway,Ididfindthis

    13requestforadmissions.Itwasdoc eted.It

    14doesn'tshowuponthe--onthelistofdoc

    eted

    15itemsonthecourt--onthemenuofthecourtfile

    16here,butit's--Iloo

    edatthefirstsetof

    17interrogatories--

    18MR.SINGER:Uh-huh.

    19THECOURT:--defendants'firstsetof

    20interrogatories,wherethosewerefiled,justthe

    21questionswithouttheanswers,anditwasplaced

    22behindthat.It'sinwiththatrequestfor

    23admissions.Soitdoesn'tjumpoutatyouifyou

    24werescrollingthroughthecourtfilethatthere's

    25arequestforadmissionsthere--intherebut

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    21/57

    21

    1thereis.

    2MR.SINGER:It--it--you

    now,thatmaybe

    3anotherdoc

    etingerroraswith--

    4THECOURT:Yeah.

    5MR.SINGER:--thefirstFinalDisposition

    6Form.

    7THECOURT:It'sunfortunatewhenwestart

    8gettingrelieduponcomputerizedfiles.That's

    9whathappenssometimesbut--

    10MR.SINGER:Yeah.Butthatdoesn'tchange

    11thefact--

    12THECOURT:There--thereisarequestfor

    13admissionshere.Letmeseewhat--itshows

    14instructions.Andthenithastheactual--and

    15definitions.Andthenitliststoadmitordeny.

    16Itrequiresthenoteandmortgagethroughan

    17assignmentthat--thatoccurredafterthefiling

    18ofthecomplaint.Thesehavenoanswerstothem.

    19MR.ELIA:Well,YourHonor,when--whenthis

    20casewasfirstfiled,itwasfiledinthenameof

    21Ban

    UnitedassigneeoftheFDICasreceiverfor

    22Ban

    UnitedFSB.

    23THECOURT:Well,anewplaintiffcanbe

    24substitutedforapreviousplaintiffina

    25foreclosureactionsimplybasedonamergerora

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    22/57

    22

    1transferof,you

    now,an--aban

    orlending

    2institutiontoanotherinstitution.

    3MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.It'smyunderstanding

    4that'swhatoccurredinthiscase.

    5THECOURT:And--andthere'sastatutein

    6Florida--Idon'thavethestatutenumberoffthe

    7topofmyheadhere.Butundertheban

    ing

    8statutes,itprovidesforsuccessorban

    resulting

    9of--fromamergeroracquisitionofanother

    10ban

    --amergerwithoracquisitionofanother

    11ban tobedeemed--presumethattheyholdthe

    12same,you

    now,instrumentsandhadalltheright

    13titleinterestofthoseinstrumentsthatwereheld

    14bytheban

    theymergedwithoracquired.SoI

    15don'tthin thefactthatoneban wasthe

    16plaintiffatthetimethe--andheldthenoteand

    17mortgageatthetimeofthefilingofthe

    18foreclosureactionandthentheywereta

    enoverby

    19anotherban

    duringdependencyoftheactionwould

    20preventthesuccessorban

    or--orsuccessor

    21plaintifffrombeingabletoproceedwiththe

    22foreclosure.

    23Letmejustloo

    atthese--letmeloo

    at

    24theserequestforadmissionsagainjustamoment.

    25MR.SINGER:Ibelievenumberthreeisalso

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    23/57

    23

    1quitesignificantasitdoesgotowardsdefendants'

    2secondaffirmativedefense.Thesecondaffirmative

    3defensestates:Failuretoexhaustnotice

    4requirements,conditionsprecedenttofiling,

    5plaintifffailedtocomplywiththenotice

    6requirementsunderparagraph22ofthemortgage.

    7Andtheiradmissionundernumberthree,theyadmit

    8thatplaintiffdidnotgivethepre-acceleration

    9noticeasrequiredbythemortgage.Thus

    10establishingdefendants'--thusestablishingat

    11leastageneral--anissueof--offactasto

    12whethersaidnoticewasprovidedin--in--in--

    13incompliancewithparagraph22ofthemortgage.

    14MR.ELIA:Well,YourHonor,there'sacopyof

    15thenoticeofdefaultletterattachedtoourreply

    16totheaffirmativedefenses.That'sintherecord.

    17It'sattachedtoourreplywhichisfiled.Wesent

    18itoutSeptember28thof2010.Ibelievethat

    19predatesthe--therequestforadmissions.

    20ThenoticewassentbyBan

    United.Ban

    United

    21letterhaddatedJuly6of2009.Anditwentto

    22Mr.BartelsandMrs.Bartelsattheir--their

    23Liverpooladdress.

    24THECOURT:Letmegetaclarificationhereon

    25theearlierpointbeforeI--beforeIlosetrac

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    24/57

    24

    1ofwhatI'mthin

    ingabouthere.

    2MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    3THECOURT:Ontheissueabout,you

    now,ifa

    4plaintiffta

    esamortgageandnotebyassignment

    5asopposedtojust,you

    now,weretheyjust--

    6wereassignedthatoneinstrumentasopposedto

    7actuallyta

    ingovertheassetsof--ofthe

    8previousban

    ,wemighthave--thatstatuteIwas

    9referringtobeforemaynotapply.Itmaybethat

    10thecomplaintneed--wouldneedtobeamended

    11and--atthatpointorsomethingratherthanjust

    12simplytreatingitasanongoingcomplaintwitha

    13substitutedplaintiff.

    14What--whatwasthesituationhere?Andit

    15maybeaddressedinyouraffidavits.Ihaven't

    16loo

    ed--readthroughallthoseyet.Howisit

    17thatARCPoolI,LLC,becamethe--becamethe

    18ownerandholderofthisnoteandmortgage?Wasit

    19justthroughassignmentofthe--ofthe--ofjust

    20afewnotesandmortgages,orwasitta

    ingover

    21Ban

    Unitedorwhat?

    22MR.ELIA:No.Thiswas--yeah,ARCPooldid

    23notta

    eoverBan

    United,YourHonor.Thiswasan

    24assignmentofoneloan.Theremayhavebeenafew

    25loans,butthiswasnot--ARCPooldidnotta

    e

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    25/57

    25

    1overBan

    United.

    2THECOURT:O

    ay.Sothat--theremaybea

    3validissuebeingraisedhereaboutwhetheratthe

    4time--you

    now,thatthisplaintiffdidnotown

    5andholdthenoteandmortgagetogetitstanding

    6tosueat--atthetimebecause--becauseitwas

    7adifferent--

    8MR.ELIA:Well,whenourcasewasfiled--

    9I'mloo ingbac atthelispendensintheoriginal

    10complaint--

    11THECOURT:Uh-huh.

    12MR.ELIA:--whichwefiledbac

    inNovember

    13of2009.Theoriginalplaintifflistedthereis

    14Ban

    UnitedassigneeoftheFDICasreceiverof

    15Ban UnitedFSB.

    16THECOURT:Right.

    17MR.ELIA:Andthatwastheowneroftheloan

    18atthattime.

    19THECOURT:How--howdidARCPoolbecomethe

    20plaintiff?Wasitthroughamotionfor

    21substitutionofplaintiff,orwasitthrough

    22amendedcomplaint?

    23MR.ELIA:I'mloo

    ing--I'mloo

    inghere,

    24sir.Sorry.

    25MR.SINGER:Toansweryourquestion,itwasa

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    26/57

    26

    1substitutionofplaintiff.However,thatmotion

    2wasdoneandexecutedexpartewithout--

    3THECOURT:Yeah.

    4MR.SINGER:--defendants'--

    5THECOURT:Thisis--

    6MR.SINGER:--presence.

    7THECOURT:--oneofthosesituationswhere

    8sometimeswegrantthoseand--when--whenit

    9loo sli eaprettystraightforwardsituation.

    10Thismaynotbe,though.Maybeitwouldhavebeen

    11betterifithadanamended--complaintamendedat

    12thatpoint.

    13MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.The--

    14MR.SINGER:Iagree.

    15MR.ELIA:IhopeI'mnotinterrupting.

    16THECOURT:No.You'reallright.Goahead.

    17MR.ELIA:ThecomplaintwasfiledinNovember

    18of2009inthenameofBan

    United.AndinMarchof

    192010--soaboutahundred--lessthan120days

    20later,therewasa--actually,itwassubmittedin

    21Februaryof2010.Soabout90dayslater,there

    22wasamotionforasubstitutionofpartyplaintiff

    23and,thereafter,anorderwhichgrantedthat--

    24thatmotion.Andattachedtothemotion--I'm

    25loo

    ingatthe--themotionforasubstitutionof

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    27/57

    27

    1partyplaintiff.

    2Subsequenttothecomplaintbeingfiled,

    3Ban

    UnitedsoldthenoteandmortgagetoARC

    4PoolI.Thereisacopyoftheassignmentof

    5warrantyattachedasanexhibit.Andthat--that

    6assignment,whichwasattached,wastheassignment

    7thatIreferencedearlierwhichisalsoattachedto

    8ourreplytoaffirmativedefenses.It'sthe

    9assignmentofmortgagesignedbyBillWilliams,

    10VicePresidentofBan

    United,assigneeoftheFDIC

    11andthereceiverforBan UnitedFSB.Anditshows

    12assignmentcalledBan

    UnitedtoARCPoolI,LLC.

    13Thatwasabasisforthegrantingofthe

    14substitutingplaintiff.

    15THECOURT:Andmypredecessorjudgeinthis

    16case,JudgeWright,signedtheordergrantingthat.

    17Let'ssee.Well,itreallyjustboilsdowntoa

    18questionofwhether--amotionforsummary

    19judgment--whetherthere'sanygenuineissueof

    20materialfactaboutwhetherthiscurrentplaintiff

    21becametheownerandholderofthenoteand

    22mortgagebyvirtueofanassignmentor--or

    23otherwise.Inthiscase,they'resayingit'sby

    24virtueofthisassignmentand,therefore,would

    25havetherightto--toforeclosethe--the

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    28/57

    28

    1mortgage.

    2Ithin

    abetterpracticeprobablywould--in

    3retrospectwouldhavebeentohavethemfilean

    4amendedcomplaintallegingandexplaininghowthey

    5becametheholderofthenoteandmortgagesothe

    6defendantcouldraiseanydefensesorresponseto

    7that--thatwouldbeneeded.Butthosecanstill

    8bedealtwithnowas--as--ifthere--ifthere

    9aredefensestothat.ButIdon't--Idon't now

    10thatthat'sreallyanissuewhenyougetrightdown

    11toitbecausetheydo--thereis,apparently,an

    12assignmentofthatandsuithasbeenfiledwith

    13an--withinthereplytotheaffirmativedefense

    14asapleading.It'sbeenfiledasexhibittothat

    15pleading.AndalsoIthin it--wasitpartofan

    16affidavittoo?Wasitreferredtoinanaffidavit

    17aswell?Let'ssee.

    18MR.ELIA:Theaffidavitsof--of

    19indebtedness,whichmyclienthassubmitted,

    20they've--they'veallallegedthattheallegation

    21andcomplaintaretrueandthatARCPoolIowns

    22the--theloan.

    23THECOURT:O

    ay.Well,that--sothat--

    24thatestablishesasevidence,you

    now,as

    25testimonyin--inthecourtfileandtherecord.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    29/57

    29

    1SoIdon't

    nowiftherereallyisanissuehereat

    2thispointaboutthefactthattheplaintiffowns

    3andholdsthenoteandmortgageandisentitledto

    4see

    foreclosureofit.

    5ThentheonlyotherquestionIstillgotis

    6aboutthisagreement.You

    now,iftheparties

    7reachedsome

    indofanagreementto--toresolve

    8thisthatwould--perhapsthenwe'retal

    ingabout

    9awholedifferentcauseofactionfor--ifthere's

    10beenabreachofthe--ofthesettlementagreement

    11versus,you now,acauseofactiononthenoteand

    12mortgageitself.Inotherwords,themortgagemay

    13havebeenreplacedbythisagreement.

    14MR.SINGER:Ithin

    the--

    15MR.ELIA:YourHonor,the--withoutgoing

    16intotoomuchdetail,thiswasaforbearance

    17agreementso--

    18THECOURT:Sothatjustmeansyouwouldhold

    19offonpursuingtheforeclosure.

    20MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.Itwasnota--itwas

    21notamodificationoranovationofthetermsof

    22theloan.

    23THECOURT:O

    ay.

    24MR.ELIA:Andit'smy--it'smyclient's

    25positionthatwe'reproceedingwiththeforeclosure

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    30/57

    30

    1atthistime.

    2THECOURT:Soyourclientta

    espositionthat

    3whatevertermsof--whatevertermsofthat

    4agreementthatwouldcallforforbearanceareno

    5longerapplicableandthatyoudon't--nolonger

    6havetoforbear.

    7MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.The--thedefaulton

    8theloanhasnotbeencured.

    9THECOURT:O ay.Isthataddressedinthe--

    10thatamended--intheaffidavitoramended

    11affidavitofindebtednesssomewhere?

    12MR.ELIA:Idon'tthin

    itisspecifically

    13mentioned,YourHonor,butitwillsayinthere

    14thatthe--itwillspecificallysaythattheloan

    15isindefault,sir.

    16THECOURT:O

    ay.

    17MR.SINGER:YourHonor,nowthatI've--

    18THECOURT:There'sbeennofilingofan

    19agreementor--oraffidavitreferringtosome

    20otheragreementbythedefense,hasthere?

    21MR.SINGER:There'stheadmissionswhich

    22statethattheagreementreachedatmediationis

    23differentthantheset--differentthanthe

    24forbearanceagreement.So,technically,Iguess,

    25therewas--there'sbeentwoagreementsreached.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    31/57

    31

    1Oneinmediation,whichthere'snoevidencefor

    2otherthanplaintiff'sadmissions,andthenthe

    3forbearanceagreementaswell.

    4THECOURT:Sobecauseofalac

    ofaresponse

    5totherequestforadmission,you'resayingit's

    6deemedadmittedthattherewassomeotheragreement

    7otherthanaforbearanceagreement?

    8MR.SINGER:I'msayingthat--yeah,thatthe

    9plaintiffhasadmitted--numberfive,theyadmit

    10thatasettlementwasreachedinmediation.And,

    11numbersix,theyadmitthatthesettlements--the

    12termsprovidedintheforbearanceagreementare

    13differentthanthetermsagreedtointhemediation

    14settlementagreement.Numberseven,theyadmit

    15thatthemediationagreementwasthefulland

    16completesettlementagreement.And,numbereight,

    17theyadmitthattheyrefusetocomplywiththe

    18settlementagreement.

    19THECOURT:Buthowisthecourtto

    nowwhat

    20thatsettlementagreementsays?Whetheritsays

    21thatthey--theycannolonger--ifit'san

    22agreementthatsaysthis--thissatisfiestheloan

    23orsatisfiesthenoteandmortgageandbecomesa

    24newagreementli

    eanovation,howamIto

    now

    25that?Idon'thave--nothing'sbeenfiled,you

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    32/57

    32

    1

    now,showingwhat--indicatingwhat--whatthe

    2termsofthatagreementare.Nobody'sexplainedit

    3indetailinanaffidavitorfiledacopyofit.

    4SoallIhaveisjustsome--sometechnical

    5admissionbytheplaintiffthatthereisa

    6settlementagreementthat'sdifferentfroma

    7forbearanceagreement.Butthatsettlement

    8agreementmayjustsayyou'regoingtoma

    e

    9paymentsofXamount,andifyoudon't,we'regoing

    10toproceedwiththeforeclosure.Imean,Idon't

    11 nowwhatitsaid.

    12MR.SINGER:I--you

    now,there--I--I

    13don't nowwhatitsayseither.There'sno

    14evidenceinthecourtfile.ButIthin

    thatdoes

    15raiseanotherissueoffact.

    16THECOURT:Doesyourclienthaveacopyof

    17thisagreement?

    18MR.BARTELS:Idon'thaveacopyofitwith

    19me,no.

    20THECOURT:Doesanybodyhaveacopyofit,I

    21wonder?

    22Mr.Elia,areyou--doyouhave--areyou

    23familiarwithaseparateagreementbesidesthis

    24forbearanceagreementyou'vealreadyreferredto?

    25MR.ELIA:No,sir.TheonlyagreementthatI

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    33/57

    33

    1seeistheforbearanceagreement.

    2THECOURT:Andwasthereamediationinthis

    3case?

    4MR.ELIA:I'llta

    ealoo

    bac

    ,sir.

    5MR.BARTELS:Yes,therewasamediation.

    6THECOURT:Mr.Bartels--Bartelsissaying

    7therewasamediation.Andyou'resayingthat's

    8whentheagreementoccurredduringthis--

    9MR.BARTELS:Therewasanagreementin

    10mediation.Thatagreementchangedaftermediation

    11againbyARC.

    12THECOURT:Wasthisanagreementwherethe

    13mediatorjustwrite--wroteoutsome indof

    14handwrittenagreement?

    15MR.BARTELS:Theyputittogetherandthenit

    16wasn't--ARCPooldidn'tacceptthemediationat

    17thatpoint--afterapointofitbeingagreedin

    18themediation.Andthenthegoalpostarrived

    19after--afterthatdate.

    20THECOURT:Soyou'resayingtheychangedthe

    21agreement--

    22MR.BARTELS:Yeah.

    23THECOURT:--basically,afterwards?

    24MR.BARTELS:Afterthemediationappointment,

    25yeah.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    34/57

    34

    1THECOURT:Haditbeenputinwritingand

    2signedatsomepoint?

    3MR.BARTELS:Somethingwassignedduringthe

    4mediation,butthenitwaschangedagainafter.

    5THECOURT:Youdidn'tgetacopyofthe--

    6MR.BARTELS:Wegotsomecopies.Butthere

    7wasafewdifferentcopiesthatwereflyingabout.

    8THECOURT:Well,I

    nowthemediationsused

    9tobe--havebeenchronicallyaproblemwhere

    10somebodyrepresentingtheban

    willbeatthe

    11mediationandmaybetheir--ortheattorneythat's

    12theredoesn't--isnottunedintowhatother

    13personsattheban areagreeingtoontheside

    14withthe--withthe--withthe--withthe

    15defendant.Butitwouldbeniceifsomebodyhadan

    16actualdocumenttopresent.

    17MR.ELIA:There--there'samediationreport

    18whichwasfiledonDecember1stof2010.

    19THECOURT:Allright.

    20MR.ELIA:So,yes,therewasamediation.

    21Themediationreportindicatesthattherewasan

    22agreement.

    23THECOURT:O

    ay.Iseethatnow.AnnKiser

    24wasrepresentingtheplaintiff.Plaintiff's

    25attorneywasJohnStu

    ey.Mr.Bartelsand

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    35/57

    35

    1Mrs.Bartelswerethere.Defendants'attorney

    2DennisChen.

    3MR.ELIA:Yes.

    4THECOURT:Itsayssignedsettlement

    5agreementwasreachedduringthismediationanda

    6copywillnotbefiledwiththecourt.Andthe

    7mediatorsignedthatreport.

    8O

    ay.Well,Mr.Elia,isit--isityour

    9positionthatthat'sthe--Elia.I'msorry.AmI

    10mispronouncingyourname?Isthatthe--areyou

    11sayingthat'stheforbearanceagreementyou'vebeen

    12referringto,oristheresomething--

    13MR.ELIA:Yes,itis,sir.

    14THECOURT:Mr.Bartelsissayingthatthat

    15forbearanceagreementisnotthesameagreement

    16thatwasreachedatthemediation.

    17MR.SINGER:That'swhatdefendantis--

    18MR.ELIA:Well,there--therearespecific

    19terms--

    20THECOURT:Andmister--justincaseyou

    21didn'thearthat,Mr.Elia,Mr.Singerissaying

    22thatthat'swhat'sreferredtointherequestfor

    23admissionsthatwasnotdenied.Butthat'sa

    24separateagreement.But,hereagain,wedon't

    now

    25whatitis.It'sjustreferred--it'sreferredto

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    36/57

    36

    1assomeseparateagreement.Wedon't

    nowwhatthe

    2termsofthatseparateagreementare,whichIta

    e

    3itwouldbesomethingthatwaswrittendownatthe

    4timeofthemediationconference.

    5MR.ELIA:Yes,therearesome--thereare

    6somenotesandtermswrittendownhere.

    7THECOURT:O

    ay.

    8MR.ELIA:Idon'tbelievethattheseare

    9filed.

    10THECOURT:It's,apparently,not.AndI

    11gatherthey'renotsignedby--executedbyanybody

    12butIdon't

    now.

    13Well--

    14MR.ELIA:Whatseemstobeindicatedherewas

    15thatthe--sortofanagreementortheyhopedto

    16getintotheforbearanceagreement,YourHonor.

    17THECOURT:That'swhatyou'resayingthe

    18notesinthemediationseemtoindicate?

    19MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    20THECOURT:Well,ofcourse,noneofthat'sof

    21record,so.

    22Well,letmejustsay--

    23MR.ELIA:Therehasn'tbeenany--

    24THECOURT:--atthispoint--

    25MR.ELIA:Therehasn'tbeenanysettlementor

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    37/57

    37

    1forbearancewhichhassecuredthisloan.That's

    2whymyofficeisproceedingwiththeforeclosure.

    3THECOURT:Well,Ithin

    --letmejust

    4say--

    5MR.ELIA:Sometimes,though,therehasbeen

    6moreeffortsasshownbythe--well,it'snotof

    7record,buttherewasa--therewasthesubsequent

    8agreement,forbearanceagreement,signedsome

    9monthsafter.

    10THECOURT:O

    ay.Well,letmejustsaywhat

    11Ithin atthispoint.Ithin that--Ithin --

    12Idon'tthin

    thereisagenuineissueofmaterial

    13factaboutwhetherARCPool,theplaintiffhere,

    14can--hasauthorityandstandingtoforeclosethis

    15noteandmortgage.Ithin itdoes.Atleastas

    16faraswhetheritcanbe--whetherit'saproper

    17plaintiff,inotherwords,atthisjunctureofthe

    18case.Ithin

    that'sbeenestablishedbythe

    19affidavitsinthefile.

    20Now,astowhether--notwithstandingthe--

    21thefailuretoanswerthe--inresponsetorequest

    22foradmissions.ButIthin

    thehangupforme

    23thatI--that'sgoingtopreventmefromentering

    24asummaryjudgmenttodayisthepossiblesettlement

    25thatisnotofrecord.Andthecourthasnowayof

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    38/57

    38

    1

    nowing--it'sbeenac

    nowledgedbyalac

    of--

    2ofadenialtotherequestforadmissionsthat

    3thereissometypeofsettlementagreementout

    4there,whichIthin

    createsanissue--agenuine

    5issueofmaterialfactrightnowthat--thatmight

    6ultimatelyprevent--you

    now,that--that

    7prevents--Ishouldnotsayultimately,butat

    8thispointpreventsmefromenteringasummary

    9judgment.

    10Now,thatmaybeallcleareduplateron

    11throughfilingsofsubsequentaffidavitsorother

    12filingsintherecord.Maybeasummaryjudgment

    13maybeappropriatelateron.Ifnot,wecanalways

    14haveatrialandtrytohavetheplaintiffproveup

    15thiscaseatthat--atthatjuncture.

    16MR.ELIA:JudgeSelph--

    17THECOURT:Yes,sir.Whatdoyouwantto

    18say?

    19MR.ELIA:I'mloo

    ingatthelaterdoc

    et

    20entries.

    21THECOURT:O

    ay.

    22MR.ELIA:Itappearsthatmyoffice--

    23appearsthatmyofficefiled,inOctoberof2011,a

    24motiontoenforce--it'slistedasforeclosure

    25agreement.AndalsoonOctober12,plaintiff's

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    39/57

    39

    1affidavitinsupportofmotiontoenforcethe

    2forbearanceagreement.

    3THECOURT:Soyou'resayingthatputsitin

    4therecordthere?

    5MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.I'mpullingthoseup

    6now.

    7MR.SINGER:Iwouldli

    etopointoutthat

    8saidmotionthatplaintiff'scounselisreferring

    9tohas--hasnotbeennoticedbytheplaintifffor

    10todayorforanyothertime.Andaccording--I

    11don'tbelieve--

    12THECOURT:Sothecourthasn'truledonit

    13yet.

    14MR.SINGER:Thecourthasnotruledonthe--

    15theforbearance--

    16MR.ELIA:YourHonor,there'sactuallyacopy

    17oftheforbearanceagreementattachedasanexhibit

    18tothatmotion.

    19THECOURT:O

    ay.

    20MR.ELIA:Ijustnoticed--

    21THECOURT:O

    ay.Iappreciateyoubringing

    22thatupbecauseIhadnotnoticedthatyeteither.

    23Let'ssee.

    24Whenwasthatfiled?

    25MR.ELIA:Thedateoffilingofthemotion

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    40/57

    40

    1andtheaffidavitareOctober12thof2011.

    2THECOURT:O

    ay.

    3MR.ELIA:AndIagreethat--withopposing

    4counsel--thatthemotiontoenforceitisnotset

    5forhearingtoday.Butifitcanclarifytheother

    6endsthecourtbroughtupwhichthecourtfelt

    7mightpreventsummaryjudgment,Ihopeitdoes.

    8THECOURT:O

    ay.Well,letmeloo

    .Letme

    9loo atthat.Itisa--itisa--thereisan

    10affidavitherethataccompaniedthatmotion.

    11Plaintiff'saffidavitinsupportofmotionto

    12enforceforbearanceagreement.AnnKiser,whohad

    13beenthe,Iguess,thecorporaterepresentativeof

    14theplaintiffatthemediation,isthepersonthat

    15signedthisaffidavit.Let'sseewhatitsays.

    16Ofcourse,shestatesshehasactualand

    17personal

    nowledgeofthefactsthatshe's

    18referringtohere.Thatdefendantexecuteda

    19forbearanceagreementonoraboutApril7,2011,

    20whereindefendantsagreedtoma

    eincreasedmonthly

    21paymentstoplaintiffintheamountof$4,000until

    22May1,2012.Acopyofsaidagreementisattached

    23asExhibitAtothis--totheaffidavit.

    24Itgoesontorefertothefactthat

    25defendantshavefailedtoma

    ethepaymentsduefor

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    41/57

    41

    1themonthsofJuly,August,andSeptemberof2011.

    2Anditgoesontosaypursuanttothetermination

    3conditionsoftheagreement,theagreementis

    4automaticallyterminatedifthedefendantsbecome

    530dayslateonanypayment.Whichifthat'strue,

    6thenitdoesn'treallyrequireacourtactionto

    7terminatethatagreement.Itterminatesonits--

    8underitsownterms.

    9MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    10THECOURT:Itgoesoninthe--thelast

    11paragraphheretosaytheagreementalsoentitles

    12plaintifftoadeedinlieuforthesubject

    13propertyandrequiresthedeedinlieutobe

    14executedanddeliveredtoplaintiffwithin30days

    15ofanybreachoftheagreement.

    16So,Iguess,ifyouweresee

    ingtoenforce

    17thatagreement,asyourmotionsuggestedthere,you

    18wouldbeas

    ingthecourttoorderthemtoenter--

    19toexecuteadeedinlieu.

    20MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    21MR.SINGER:But,again,thatmotionisnot

    22before--

    23THECOURT:Andthat--

    24MR.SINGER:--thecourttoday.

    25THECOURT:Thatmotion'snotbeforethe

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    42/57

    42

    1court.I'mnotgoingtograntthat.I'mgoingto

    2denythatmotiontoday.But--butwe're--

    3instead,theplaintiffhasnot--hasnotsetthat

    4forhearingtopursuethat.They--plaintiffis

    5simplynowjustwantingtogoaheadandgeta

    6foreclosurejudgment.

    7MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    8THECOURT:Andsotheplaintiffs,bythis

    9affidavit,issayingthat--thatagreementthat

    10wasreachedatthemediationthatwas--hasbeen

    11breachedbythedefendantsand,therefore,is

    12terminatedunderitsownterms.

    13MR.SINGER:Myclienthasadditionallyfiled

    14anaffidavitin--to--tocounterplaintiff's

    15affidavit,statingthattheagreementwasnever

    16breachedbutratherterminatedpursuanttothe

    17conditionentitledTerminationConditions,

    18paragraphfive--

    19THECOURT:Whenwasthat--I'msorryto

    20interrupt.ButwhenwasthataffidavitfiledsoI

    21canfindithere?

    22MR.SINGER:Itwasratherrecently.

    23THECOURT:Hererecently.

    24MR.SINGER:Wewerejustrecentlyretainedby

    25the--thedefendant.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    43/57

    43

    1THECOURT:ButIdon'tseeitinhere.

    2MR.SINGER:Itwasfiledanditwas--acopy

    3wasfaxedandservedupontheplaintiff.

    4THECOURT:Doyouhaveacopyofitwithyou?

    5MR.SINGER:Ido.

    6THECOURT:There'salittlebit--there'sa

    7lagtimeinthecler

    's--onthe--onthecler

    's

    8loggingthesethingsintothecourtfile.SoI--

    9thelastentryIseeonthecourtfilelisthereis

    10January24.Andthat's,obviously--

    11MR.SINGER:There'sthe--

    12THECOURT:--beenseveralwee

    ssincethen.

    13MR.SINGER:--two-pageaffidavitof

    14defendantGaryBartels.

    15THECOURT:O ay.Thisaffidavit--

    16MR.ELIA:Idon'thaveit,YourHonor.

    17THECOURT:O

    ay.

    18MR.SINGER:Ihave--

    19THECOURT:Itappearstohavebeensignedon

    20February14th.

    21MR.SINGER:Ihave--

    22THECOURT:Justover--wasit--twodays

    23ago.Andwasitfiledinthecourtfileatleast

    24twoday--you

    now,requisitetimepriortothe

    25motionbeingheardtoday?

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    44/57

    44

    1MR.SINGER:I--I--Idon't

    now,Your

    2Honor.

    3THECOURT:Thisisacopy?

    4MR.SINGER:Thatisacopy.

    5THECOURT:Doyou

    nowwhenyoufiledit?

    6MR.SINGER:Ibelieveitwasservedonthe

    7dateindicated.Idon't

    now.

    8THECOURT:Hasitbeenfiledinthecourt

    9fileismyquestion?

    10MR.SINGER:I'dhavetochec

    withthecler

    .

    11THECOURT:Youdon'thaveacopyofyour

    12noticeoffiling,anythingli

    ethat?

    13MR.SINGER:No,YourHonor.Ijusthavethe

    14copy--actually,Ithin

    Imight.

    15THECOURT:I'mjustgoingtoloo atthis

    16affidavithere.

    17O

    ay.He'ssayingthatuponreadingand

    18signingtheforbearanceagreement,heagreedto

    19thesetermsprovidedhisfinancialcondition

    20continuestosupportamonthlypaymentof$4,000.

    21Idon'tthin

    theagreementsaysyouget--

    22youpaythe$4,000aslongasyoucanaffordit,

    23didit?Itjustsaidyoupay$4,000.

    24MR.SINGER:Theagreementstates,under

    25terminationconditions,paragraphtwo,the--well,

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    45/57

    45

    1it--theterminationconditionsstarts,this

    2forbearanceagreementisautomaticallyterminated

    3underanyofthefollowingcircumstances:

    4Circumstancenumbertwostatesthefactsor

    5circumstancesrelatingtoborrowers--

    6MR.ELIA:Whichsectionisthis?I'msorry.

    7I'm--I'mloo

    ingatit.

    8MR.SINGER:Terminationconditions.There's

    9nonumberedparagraphsoftheforbearance

    10agreement.Itjuststates--

    11MR.ELIA:There'spagenumbers.Whatpage

    12number?

    13MR.SINGER:Pagefourofseven.Sorry.On

    14pagefourofseven,terminationconditions,the

    15forbearanceagreementisautomaticallyterminated

    16when,undersubparagraphtwo,wherethefactsor

    17circumstancesrelatingtoborrowersfinancial

    18conditionwhichcausedARCPoolI,comma,LLC,to

    19enterintothisagreementaresubstantially

    20changed.

    21Mrs--Mr.Bartels'employer--unfortunately,

    22lastyear,Mr.Bartels'employerwentinto

    23liquidation.And,asdetailedintheaffidavit,

    24thiscausedMr.Bartelstolosehis--hisposition

    25withthatemployerandtohaveasubstantialdrop

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    46/57

    46

    1inincomeasdetailedintheaffidavitthus

    2supportingthepropositionthat,you

    now,there

    3wasasubstantialchangein--inMr.Bartels'

    4financialconditionwhichoperatedtoterminatethe

    5forbearanceagreementandsaid--saidevents

    6occurredpriortoany--anybreach.

    7THECOURT:Well,thatterminatesthe

    8forbearanceagreementthen.Doesthatmeanhe's--

    9he'sbac tosquareonewherehe's--wherehe's

    10facingthisforeclosurethen?

    11MR.SINGER:There'sstilltheac nowledgment

    12thatthere'saseparatesettlementagreement

    13reachedatmediation.

    14MR.ELIA:Itsaysrightin--inthe

    15paragraphfollowingthat,uponanyofthe

    16circumstancessetforthaboveorborrowersbreach

    17ofentitytermoftheoriginalnoteandmortgage

    18ARCPool(indiscernible)resumeforeclosurewithout

    19furthernotice.Andthat'swhatwe're--we'dli

    e

    20todo,YourHonor.

    21MR.SINGER:But,again,plaintiffhas--the

    22motiontoenforcetheagreementandenforcethose

    23provisionsisnotbeforethecourt.

    24THECOURT:Well,Idon't

    nowthattheyhave

    25togetenforcementofthe--oftheagreementif

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    47/57

    47

    1theagreementterminatesunderitsowntermsandit

    2saystheycangoforwardwith--withforeclosure.

    3That's,infact,whatthey'redoingheretoday.

    4And--andtheymoveforsummaryjudgment

    5foreclosure.Sothenthey'resaying--inessence,

    6that'sreallywhattheyare--hadnoticedfor

    7todayis--isthe--istocarryonwhat--to

    8enforcethatagreementis--inotherwords,

    9enforcingtheagreementandsee ingaforeclosure

    10judgmentareoneinthesame.

    11Let'ssee.Andsincethatisofrecord--and

    12I--I--Imisspo

    eearlierwhenIwasthin

    ing

    13thatwasnot--thatthetermsoftheagreement

    14werenotintherecord.And--andIhavetoalso,

    15Ithin ,retreatfromwhatIsaidbeforetoothat

    16thatwouldhavepleadedgenuineissueofmaterial

    17factbecauseIthin

    that'sbeeneliminatedby

    18the--theactual--theaffidavitofthe--of

    19Ms.Kiserandthe--herreferencetotheagreement

    20andtheagreementbeingfiledinthecourtfileat

    21thesametimethat--whenitwas--accompanied

    22thatmotionandheraffidavitas--whatis

    23referencedinheraffidavit.Ididn'tactuallysee

    24itattachedtotheaffidavitshereferstoasan

    25exhibit.Itisfiledatthesametimewiththat

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    48/57

    48

    1motion.AndIdon'tthin

    thereisagenuineissue

    2ofmaterialfactatthispointastothe

    3plaintiff'sstandingtosee

    foreclosure.And

    4there'snogenuineissueofmaterialfactbeing

    5raisedastotheamountsowed.

    6MR.SINGER:Actually,YourHonor,Iwould

    7li

    etoraise--weneveraddressedtheamended

    8affidavitofindebtednesswhichyouprovidedme,

    9andI--asthecourt's--Iwouldli etoaddress

    10thatatthistime.

    11THECOURT:O ay.Yeah,youjustgotacopy

    12ofthathandedtoyouamomentago.Sowhatdoyou

    13wanttosayaboutthat?

    14MR.SINGER:Theaffidavitis--isquite

    15erroneousonitsface.Itstatesthatthe

    16plaintiffintheabove-styledactionis

    nownas

    17AssetsResolutionCorporationPensionPlan.That

    18isclearlynotthecase.There'sbeen,atnopoint

    19inthisentirecourtproceedingwithinthepast

    20two-plusyears,anyindicationthatthereisan

    21AssetsResolutionCorporatePensionPlan.The

    22affidavit--theaffiantsthemself--

    23THECOURT:Iassumethat'swhatARCstands

    24for,butthat'snot--

    25MR.SINGER:Butthat's--

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    49/57

    49

    1THECOURT:--thesamename,yeah.

    2MR.SINGER:Yeah.That'snotevidencebefore

    3thecourttoday.

    4Theaffiantsignsasamanagingmemberof

    5AssetsResolutionCorporationPensionPlanisnoin

    6way--there'snoevidencethathe'saffiliated

    7withtheplaintifforthatAssetsResolution

    8CorporationPensionPlanisinanywayaffiliated

    9withtheplaintiffinthiscase.Ithin that--

    10thatraisessignificantissuesastothisaffidavit

    11andtowhetheritcanbeusedinsupportofthe

    12judgmentsoughtbytheplaintiffwhenthis

    13affidavitisinnowaycompletedbytheplaintiff

    14oranyentitywithanysortof

    nownorestablished

    15relationshiptotheplaintiff.

    16THECOURT:O

    ay.We're--it'sli

    eagame

    17ofping-pong.We

    eepgoingbac

    andforthhere.

    18Sowhat--that's--that'ssomethingIhadn'teven

    19paidattentionto.Imean,Ipulledupacopyof

    20theaffidavit.Ihaven'treadityet.

    21Mr.Singer'snowhadachancetodothat.

    22What--whatdoyousaytothat,Mr.Elia?

    23MR.ELIA:I'mnotsurewhythatnameis

    24listedintheaffidavit,YourHonor.

    25THECOURT:Well,theaffiantneedstobeable

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    50/57

    50

    1toexplainhow--you

    now,howhehas

    nowledgeof

    2thefactshe's--he'sstatinginhisaffidavit.

    3Andhe'ssayinghe's--he'ssaying--he'ssaying

    4itonbehalfofAssetsResolutionCorporation

    5PensionPlan.

    6MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.Idon't

    nowwhythat

    7nameisthere.

    8MR.SINGER:ARCPoolI,LLC,theplaintiff,

    9isonlymentionedinthecasestyleatthetopof

    10the--thepage.It'snotmentionedanywhere

    11withintheaffidavit.AndIdon't nowthatthe

    12recordsattachedtotheaffidavitortheaffidavit

    13itselfcan--canstand.Andsothereare--there

    14issignificant--anythingwhichthisaffidavit

    15wouldsupportastoplaintiff's,Ibelieve,is

    16invalid.Butsignificantlyisthisaffidavitis

    17theonlyevidenceof--ofindebtedness.

    18MR.ELIA:I'm--

    19MR.SINGER:Ibelieveitdefinitelyfailsas

    20tothatandwouldraisegeneralissuesoffactand

    21lawastotheissuesofindebtednessanddamagesto

    22beissued.

    23THECOURT:O

    ay.Well--

    24MR.ELIA:Idon't--

    25THECOURT:--astothatamendedaffidavit,

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    51/57

    51

    1thatmaybethecase.Ithin

    Mr.Eliawantedto

    2refer--wastryingtorefertotheearlier

    3affidavit,butheprobablydidn'thearthatyou

    4werestilltal

    ing.

    5MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.Idon'tthin

    Mr.Singer

    6isactuallycontestingtheamountdue.Ithin

    7thathe'ssayingthatpossiblytheremaybean

    8errorinmyclientsaysitisowedto.

    9THECOURT:Well,but--

    10MR.ELIA:I'm--I'mloo

    ing--Idon'tthin

    11thathisclienthasofferedanythingshowingthat

    12paymentsweremadeorthattheamountslisteddue

    13aresomehowincorrect.Iwasjustloo ingbac at

    14prioraffidavitsfiledinthiscase.

    15THECOURT:Well,he's,basically,playing

    16defense,whichishisjob.You

    now,ifa--ifa

    17movingpartyonamotionforsummaryjudgmentwants

    18to--hastoestablish,you

    now,anundisputed

    19facttosupportthemotionthenithasbasediton

    20anaffidavit.Iftheaffidavitis--doesn'thave

    21the--theprerequisitesinittoestablishthe--

    22orthepredicatesestablishedto--forthat

    23affianttobeabletosweartothosefacts--

    24MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    25THECOURT:--then--then--evenifhe's

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    52/57

    52

    1not--hasn'traisedanyissuesaboutthenumbers,

    2it'sstillincumbentupontheplaintiff,asa

    3movingparty,toestablishthe--thetruthof

    4thosenumbers.Now--

    5MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    6THECOURT:--Iassume--Iassumetheywere

    7mentionedinthepreviousaffidavitaswell.I'm

    8curiouswhat--howthatone'swor

    ingtoonowthat

    9we're--

    10MR.SINGER:Theissue--

    11MR.ELIA:Weactuallyhavethe--the

    12plaintiffname,ARCPoolI,LLC,MarylandLimited

    13LiabilityCompany.Soit's--it'smythoughtthat

    14thisisprobablyjustanerror--

    15THECOURT:Probablyis.

    16MR.ELIA:--thatanotherentityislisted.

    17MR.SINGER:It'sun

    nownwhetherit'serror.

    18MR.ELIA:Andsoatthispoint,ratherthan

    19havingasummaryjudgmentdenied,I'dli

    eto

    20requestacontinuancetogetanamendedaffidavit

    21tostatethecorrectentitytowhomthatamountis

    22due.

    23MR.SINGER:It'snotjustthe--theissueof

    24theentity.Weareindeeddisputingtheamounts

    25owed.ThepreviousaffidavitwasfiledinJanuary,

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    53/57

    53

    12011.Sincethen,severalthousandsofdollars

    2havebeenpaidonthisloanas--asestablishedin

    3defendants'affidavitandasconcededin--in

    4severalofplaintiff'sfilingsthatfundswerepaid

    5pursuanttotheforbearanceagreement.AndIdon't

    6

    nowthatthere'sany,you

    now,established

    7recordsasto--you

    now,Idon't

    nowwhatthese

    8recordsarebecausethey'renot--Imean,they--

    9you now,obviously,arecordhasbeensubmitted,

    10butit'sneverbeenestablishedwhatthisrecord

    11is,whoserecorditis,whetherit'stherecordof

    12AssetsResolutionCorporatePensionPlanas

    13indicatedintheaffidavit.Andso--

    14THECOURT:Well,here'sthedeal.I--I

    15thin we'verun--runthegamutonthisatthis--

    16MR.SINGER:Allright.

    17THECOURT:--point.SowhatI'mgoingtodo

    18isI'mgoingtodenythemotionforsummary

    19judgment.ThereasonsIwasstatingearlier,I

    20thin

    Ihavetoretreatfrom,asImentioned

    21before.I'mgoingtostillsaythatARCPool

    22appearstobethecorrectplaintiffandisentitled

    23tosee

    foreclosure,asImentionedbefore.

    24Ithin

    thefilingoftheaffidavitof--of

    25Ms.Kiserinsupportofthemotiontoenforcethe

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    54/57

    54

    1forbearanceagreementeliminatesanissueoffact

    2aboutwhetherthatagreementpreventsa

    3foreclosure.Infact,itseemsto--itdoesjust

    4theopposite.Itsupportsplaintiff'sposition

    5that--thatthe--theagreement'sbeenterminated

    6byitsownterm--underitsownterms.Eventhe

    7defendants'affidavitac

    nowledgeshedidn'tma

    e

    8thepaymentspursuanttothatagreement.And,

    9therefore,Ithin underthatagreementthere's

    10no--theagreementinno--innowaypreventsthe

    11plaintifffromsee ingforeclosure.Infact,it--

    12itauthorizesthemtogoforwardwithforeclosure,

    13whichthey'reattemptingtodo.Theonlyissuenow

    14seemstobethe--the--theindebtednessandthe

    15problemswiththeamendedaffidavitofindebtedness

    16thatwe'vealreadytal

    edabout.

    17MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    18THECOURT:Andthepreviousaffidavit,

    19althoughitwouldestablishsomeamounts,

    20there's--thereare--thereseemstobeanissue

    21offactatthispointraisedbythedefendantin

    22hisaffidavitconcerningpaymentshe'smadeand

    23whatthatindebtednessactuallywouldbeatthis

    24point.

    25SoI'mgoingtodenythemotionforsummary

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    55/57

    55

    1judgmentwithoutprejudicesothateitherpartycan

    2pursueasummaryjudgmentlaterby--byfilinga

    3newmotion--

    4MR.ELIA:Yes,sir.

    5THECOURT:--if--if--ifthefactsand--

    6andtherecordsupportthat.So,ofcourse,the

    7newaffidavitsmay--mayfollowwhateveris

    8necessarytodothat;orthepartiescansetitfor

    9trialiftheypreferthatitgothatroute.

    10So,Mr.Singer,ifyou'llpreparetheorder

    11denyingthemotionforsummaryjudgment.It

    12doesn'tneedtogointoalotofdetailbecausewe

    13havearecordhereofeverythingwe'vetal ed

    14about.Butjustsimplysayingit'sdeniedwithout

    15prejudice.AndI'llenteritwhenyousenditto

    16me.

    17MR.SINGER:O

    ay.YourHonor,Iwillprepare

    18anorderstatingthatthemotionisdeniedwithout

    19prejudice.

    20THECOURT:Maybey'allcanwor

    outsome

    21otherresolutioninthemeantime.Ifyoucan,

    22fine.Ifnot,we'llprobablybeseeingy'allagain

    23atanotherhearinglater.

    24MR.SINGER:Than

    you,YourHonor.

    25(Thehearingconcludedat10:14a.m.)

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    56/57

    56

    REPORTER'SCERTIFICATE

    STATEOFFLORIDA

    COUNTYOFPOLK

    I,MELODYOTHIENO,CourtReporter,certifythatI

    wasauthorizedtoanddidstenographicallyreportthe

    hearingintheabove-styledcause,Pages1through55,

    inclusive,andthatthetranscriptisatrueand

    completerecordofmystenographicnotes.

    IfurthercertifythatIamnotarelative,

    employee,attorney,orcounselofanyoftheparties,

    noramIarelativeoremployeeofanyoftheparties'

    attorneyorcounselconnectedwiththisaction,noramI

    financiallyinterestedintheaction.

    Datedthis2nddayofMarch,2012.

    ______________________________MELODYOTHIENO,COURTREPORTER

    Theoriginalofthistranscriptwasorderedbyand

    furnishedtoMichaelF.Singer.

  • 8/2/2019 ARC Pool v Bartels Mo

    57/57