archaeological monitoring impact assessment …€¦ · an archaeological resource management...

58
mmbgy Deparhent The ki,:nihba Museum ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT COMPONENT OF THE FORKS HERITAGE PLAZA PROJECT Submitted to THE FORKS RENEWAL CORPORATION QUATERNARY CONSULTANTS LIMITED November, 1993

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jul-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

mmbgy Deparhent The ki,:nihba Museum

ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND IMPACT

ASSESSMENT COMPONENT OF THE FORKS HERITAGE PLAZA

PROJECT

Submitted to

THE FORKS RENEWAL CORPORATION

QUATERNARY CONSULTANTS LIMITED

November, 1993

Page 2: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program consisted of three monitoring components and an impact assessment. The monitoring components were:

a. monitoring of soil test augering, with archaeological investigation of the drilling tailings; b. monitoring the augering of a manhole and lamp standard bore holes in the northern portion

of the plaza; and c. continual monitoring of the installation of a land drainage sewer line from the B&B Building

to the manhole near the centre of the proposed orrery.

No cultural material was encountered during the soil test augering or the augering in the northern portion of the plaza. A deposit of faunal material, identified as bison, was recovered during the monitoring of the land drainage line.

The impact assessment, in the southern portion of the plaza, consisted of mechanized excavation of two trenches, each thirty meters long. The trenches were oriented perpendicular to each other and crossed at the centre of the proposed orrery.

The impact assessment encountered recent disturbance in portions of the impact zone, relating to railroad installations of water and sewer lines. In undisturbed areas, the soil strata were intact and represented three distinct historic periods: the Railroad Period (1888 - 1988); the Railroad Development Period (1885 -1889); and the Hudson's Bay Company Experimental Farm Period (1836 -1848). No evidence of Pre-Contact occupations was encountered in the assessment trenches, indicating that extensive occupation sites (such as the Archaic horizon) do not extend into this area. The absence of archaeological material within the relatively narrow assessment trenches does not preclude the presence of small occupation sites or activity areas associated with the archaeological horizons that occur on the periphery of the proposed orrery.

Archaeological monitoring of all excavation which extends below the railroad cinder deposits (approximately one meter) is strongly recommended.

Page 3: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVESUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

. . TABLEOFCONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

. . LIST OF APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

... LISTOFFIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ill

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LISTOFTABLES iii

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Study Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2.0 MONITORING OF SOIL TEST DRILLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 Observations 3

3.0 ASSESSMENT EXCAVATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1 Excavation Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2 Laboratory Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.3 Artifact Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

3.3.1 Railroad Horizon (Zone 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.2 Clay Fill Horizon (Zone 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3.3 Experimental Farm Plow Zone (Zone 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.3.4 Recent Watermain Fill Deposits (Zone 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

3.4 Stratigraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.6 Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

4.0 MONITORING OF THE COBBLESTONE COURT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

5.0 MONITORING OF THE ORRERY LAND DRAINAGE LINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 27

LIST OF APPENDICES

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX A: Heritage Permits 30 APPENDIX B: Catalogue of Artifacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

Page 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

LIST OF TABLES

1: Mammal Remains From the Clay Fill Horizon (Zone 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 . 2: Mammal Remains From the Plow Zone Horizon (Zone 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I

LIST OF FIGURES

1: Map of The Forks Heritage Plaza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2: Location of Soil Test Auger Bore Holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3: Location of Impact Assessment Trenches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4: Stratigraphic Profile of NorthlSouth Trench . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5: Stratigraphic Profile of EasWWest Trench . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6: Location of Assessment Trenches and Prior Disturbances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 7: Location of Plaza Manhole and Lamp Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 8: Field Sketch of Bone Bed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Page 5: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

1.0 Introduction Development of The Forks Heritage Plaza is a phased project with two components - a cobblestone-

I paved courtyard and traffic area in the northern portion and a shallow, bowl-shaped orrery in the southern portion (Figure 1). As the proposed plans include sub-surface components, it is possible that archaeological resources may be impacted. Archaeological investigations have occurred on the

I I northern, southern, and western peripheries of the plaza area. During the Stage I construction

project, several cultural strata were recorded along Forks Market Road (Kroker and Goundry 1990). At the North Point Node in The Forks National Historic Site, several Pre-Contact occupation

i horizons were recorded (Adams et al. 1990). During the North Assiniboine Node Assessment to the west, evidence of the Hudson's Bay Company flour mill, a Woodland ceramic occupation

I horizon, and the extensive Archaic (3000 year old) occupation were recorded (Kroker 1989). Extensions of the Archaic horizon were investigated in conjunction with the Assiniboine Riverfront Quay Project (Kroker and Goundry 1993a), and the 1992 Public Archaeology Project (Kroker and

I Goundry 1993b). No testing or investigation has occurred to date within the defined plaza area.

In order to redress this dearth of knowledge, an archaeological resource management program was initiated. The first investigation was archaeological monitoring of the soil test drill holes undertaken by HBT AGRA Limited. The second operation consisted of archaeological impact assessment trenching in the southern portion of the plaza where impact below the rail cinder horizon could be anticipated. A third archaeological operation consisted of monitoring the excavation of a manhole and five lamp standard sites in the northwest portion of the plaza. The final operations related to the plaza consisted of monitoring land drainage (storm sewer) line excavations from the proposed orrery to the land drainage lines installed for the Children's Museum.

All four operations were approved by, and conducted under, Heritage Permits (Appendix A) issued

I by Historic Resources Branch, Department of Culture, Heritage and Citizenship. The relevant permits are A23-93 [soil test monitoring], A28-93 [impact assessment], A33-93 [manhole and lamp standard monitoring], and A34-93 [land drainage sewer line monitoring]. All projects were

1 undertaken by Quaternary Consultants Ltd. and directed by Sid Kroker.

1 .I Study Team I

The initial operation, soil test monitoring, was conducted by Sid Kroker. The impact assessment

i excavations were directed by Sid Kroker and employed Barry Greco, Paul Speidel, Geoff Marr, Eric Simonds, and Lee-Anna Smith. The backhoe was operated by Raymond Demarcke. The lamp standard monitoring was undertaken by Sid Kroker. The construction monitoring of the land

i drainage sewer line was conducted by Steve Lundin and Pat Carroll.

Laboratory operations, resulting from artifact recovery, were supervised by Pam Goundry. Barry

1 Greco, Paul Speidel, Geoff Marr, and Pat Carroll processed the material. Computer cataloguing was completed by Pam Goundry. Documentation and analysis has been undertaken by Sid Kroker and Pam Goundry.

Page 6: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program
Page 7: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

2.0 Monitoring of Soil Test Drilling The soil test operations were conducted by HBT AGRA Ltd., utilizing the services of Paddock Drilling. A total of nine test holes were drilled within the projected impact area (Figure 2). Six holes were drilled to a depth of three meters, two holes to nine meters, and the final hole was drilled to auger refusal at 15.2 meters (HBT AGRA 1993: 1).

Archaeological investigations consisted of visual inspection of the disturbed soil column observed from the auger cuttings and visual inspection of the undisturbed soil column samples retrieved from split-spoon samplers. These are tubular coring devices which are pushed into the undisturbed sediments at the base of the hole and the soil column is retrieved intact and can be examined when the tube is separated into the two vertical halves. Inasmuch as the soil strata at The Forks consist of riverine sediments, there is a considerable variation in thickness andlor presence across short distances. A similar situation can occur with regard to archaeological deposits - occupational evidence may be localized or fairly widespread.

Given the plasticity of the soil and the resultant deformation of the soil column by the 4" auger, only thick (more than 2 cm) cultural layers are readily observable. Thin horizons tend to become 'smeared' and, if observable, cannot be accurately placed in vertical context. The exceptions to this general rule are those which are noted within the split-spoon samples.

2.1 Observations Test Hole 1 extended to a depth of three meters. Slight 'smears' were noted within the upper clay horizon (0.8-1.8 m). The discolourations would indicate relict soil horizons, but no cultural evidence was present. Another 'smear' was observed at 2.6 meters, again with no cultural evidence.

Test Hole 2 consisted of fill to 1.5 meters with clay to base at 2.4 meters. No relict horizons were recorded.

Test Hole 3 extended to a depth of 3 meters. Railroad fill and a thick sand horizon extended to 1.1 meters. The clay below had a minor 'smear' between 2.5 and 2.7 meters.

Test Hole 4 extended to a depth of 3 meters. The upper 1.3 meters was cinderlgravel fill with discoloured clay below. No relict horizons were observed.

Test Hole 5 consisted of fill, primarily sand and disturbed clay, to a depth of 2.2 meters. The remaining natural deposits to termination at 3.0 meters were clay with traces of charcoal at 2.5 meters.

Test Hole 6 extended to a depth of 3.0 meters. The upper 1.2 meters were railroad cinder fill with underlying silty clay and sandy silt strata. No evidence of relict soils was noted.

Page 8: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program
Page 9: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I Test Hole 7 extended to a depth of 15.2 meters. Cinder fill comprised the upper 1.3 meters with natural deposits below that. A fragment of charred timber was recovered from the auger cuttings at an estimated depth of 1.3-1.35 meters. A thin organic horizon was noted at 1.6 meters. No

i cultural material was associated with this horizon. Archaeological monitoring ceased when Lake Agassiz clays were encountered at a depth of 11.8 meters.

I Test Hole 8 extended to a depth of 9.2 meters. Natural sediments were encountered at a depth of I 1.2 meters. Slight evidence of relict soil horizons were observed at 1.4 meters, 2.5 meters, and 3.2

meters. No cultural material was evident.

i Test Hole 9 was drilled to a depth of 9.2 meters. Alternating clay and sand horizons underlay the upper 1.5 meters of cinder fill. No definitive evidence, in the form of cultural material or horizon

! 'smears' were observed in the auger cuttings.

Page 10: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

3.0 Assessment Excavation To obtain information across this large area, two perpendicular linear trenches (Figure 3), which crossed at the centre of the proposed plaza location, were excavated. These trenches were each 30 meters long. The excavations were to a minimum depth of two meters. At selected locations, the excavations extended beyond three meters.

The centre of the trenches is located at 1065N/982W, based upon The Forks Archaeological Survey Grid which uses the City of Winnipeg survey marker (87R548), at the north end of the Low Line Bridge, as the Site Datum. This marker has been assigned the arbitrary provenience of 1000N/1000W. The 1000EIW Baseline extends from the marker to the second concrete pier (to the south of the embankment) of the CNR Main Line Bridge.

The primary focus of the impact assessment was the determination of the number of cultural horizons as well as the extent of each of these horizons. Artifacts were retrieved and analyzed to provide temporal and cultural data.

3.1 Excavation Methodology Due to the large area and the considerable depths to be investigated, the primary excavation tool was a rubbermount backhoe with an 18" bucket. To prevent disturbance of the soils below the level of the excavation, a smooth steel plate was welded to the teeth of the bucket.

The trenches were sub-divided into 5.0 meter units for horizontal provenience control. Occasionally, due to topography or other factors, the units were smaller. Vertical provenience was maintained by ensuring that the backhoe bucket took horizontal cuts, within the 5-meter unit. Each cut was generally 5 cm thick. Thicker cuts were made in archaeologically sterile strata. The recorded stratigraphy was based upon natural strata. These strata are designated within the generalized Forks horizons (Kroker 1989).

Level 1: Railroad fill strata (ca. A.D. 1885 to present) Level 2: Historic strata (A.D. 1738 to 1885) Level 3: Native Ceramic strata (ca. A.D. 1 to 1738) Level 4: Pre-Ceramic Archaic strata (ca. 3000 B.C. - A.D.l)

Stratigraphic profiles were recorded at relevant locations along each trench. The procedure involved examination of the trench wall and recording the thicknesses of each stratum (cultural horizon, fluvial deposit, relict soil zone, etc.).

The excavated soil was brought to the surface by the backhoe and spread across the ground adjacent to the trench. The field crew, using garden rakes, spread and sorted through the excavated soil. Recovery techniques also included the use of trowels and hand-retrieval. All artifacts were bagged

Page 11: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

Figure 3: Location of Impact Assessment Trenches

Page 12: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I according to horizontal provenience and excavation level. The recovery of small items such as fish scales and vertebrae validates this investigation technique.

I 3.2 Laboratory Procedures The recovered artifacts were brought to the laboratory facilities, where they were washed and sorted by material class. After the specimens had dried, all artifacts were identified by the lab personnel. Material of the same type (i.e., white porcelain saucer sherd with a green geometric pattern) within the same excavation unit and level were combined under a single catalogue number. Identification was carried to the limit obtainable by available reference works and staff expertise. Faunal remains were, where possible, identified to element and species.

1 Each sequential catalogue number consists of the Borden designation for The Forks (DlLg-33), followed by the project designator (93B - indicating the second project of 1993 on the site) and the

I specimen number (e.g., DlLg-33:93Bll). All pertinent data associated with the artifact was entered into the computer cataloguing system. The cataloguing system is based upon the Canadian Heritage Inventory Network (CHIN) system (Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature 1986; FRC 1988: 110,

I 171; Kroker and Goundry 1993a:Appendix B). The computer cataloguing program was developed I by Brian Lenius, based upon DBASE3, for use on personal computers. The project used an IBM

AT clone computer with a 40 megabyte hard drive and a dot matrix printer for the generation of

i individual artifact catalogue cards on fanfold 3" x 5" cards.

Processed artifacts were prepared for storage by inserting the specimens and the catalogue card into standard plastic storage bags, then stapling the bags closed. At the end of the project, all recovered artifacts will be delivered to the designated repository (FRC 1988).

3.3 Artifact Description

I Artifacts were recovered from three distinct horizontal strata and one intrusive recent activity. All strata are the result of human activity but incorporate artifacts representing secondary deposition. The intrusive deposits are redeposited secondary deposits. While the horizons appeared to be largely

! intact, frost cracks and rodent disturbance (tunnels, burrowing, etc.) can result in the presence of later period artifacts in earlier sedimentary strata, e.g., recent extruded nails being recovered from Fur Trade horizons. Intrusive specimens were catalogued according to the stratum from which they

I were recovered.

The artifacts consist of glass, metal, and ceramic objects with some faunal remains. The cataloguing system is based upon a functional hierarchy and specimens will be discussed within broad groupings. Unless the artifact is diagnostic andlor discussed in detail, catalogue numbers are not included in the text. The entire catalogue of recovered artifacts is attached as Appendix B.

I

Page 13: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I 3.3.1 Railroad Horizon (Zone I )

The railroad stratum consisted of layers and lenses of black coal cinders, sands, and gravels

I containing historic artifacts. Based upon its stratigraphic location, it would appear to represent relatively recent deposition and elevation raising activities undertaken by the various railroad companies after the beginning of the 20th century.

1 A total of 313 specimens were recovered from this horizon. These included artifacts representing the broad categories of Transportation, Architectural Object, Communication, Lighting, Clothing,

I Recreation, Food Processing, Detritus, Container, and Faunal Remains.

Transportation-related artifacts consist of two railroad spikes, one O-ring, five aqua glass water

i gauge tube fragments, and four sherds of red glass deriving from signalman's lanterns. The O-ring (DlLg-33:93B/296), composed of hard rubber, functioned as a seal for the steam line couplers between railroad cars (Kroker 1989:48). The degree of opacity of the red glass sherds indicate at least two sources: three sherds (DlLg-33:93B142, 168, 250) are translucent medium red and the

I fourth (DlLg-33:93B/78) is almost opaque dark red.

i The Architectural Objects consist of fourteen nails, 101 windowpane sherds, two porcelain sherds from bathroom fixtures, a fragment of a glass brick, and a fragment of a glass knob from a cupboard door. The nails are a mixture of extruded round nails (5) and sheet-cut specimens (9).

1 Three of the sheet-cut nails have T-heads, one has an L-head, and the remainder are not identifiable. Lengths of complete specimens range from 54 to 129 mm (2" - 5"). The windowpane sherds are predominately aqua, except for one thin sherd @1Lg-33:93B/10) which is translucent

I emerald green and four sherds which are clear. Thicknesses range from 2.5 to 7.9 mm. One aqua windowpane sherd (DlLg-33:93B1207) has traces of an etched geometric design. The bathroom fixture sherds (DlLg-33:93B/199, 273) are slightly curved, glazed, white coarse paste specimens.

I I The pale purple glass brick is 29.5 mm thick and square in cross-section @1Lg-33:93B185). The

face is recessed and remnants of a border lip exist. The cupboard knob sherd (DlLg-33:93B/79) is

I half of a domed, circular deep purple specimen, 29 mm in diameter and 9.9 mm high.

Telecommunication artifacts consist of six fragments of aqua telegraph insulators representing a minimum of three specimens. Only one, DlLg-33:93B/307, has any identifying marks - the embossed word "STANDARD".

I Two specimens belong in the Lighting category. These include a porcelain and copper socket fragment with some attached wiring (DlLg-33:93B/80). The information "250V" and part of a serial number "...47065" are embossed on this artifact. The second specimen, DlLg-33:93B181, is the

I copper base of a light bulb.

Two artifacts belong to the Clothing category. The first is a plain, white, four-hole plastic button

I (DlLg-33:93B182) and the second is a portion of a leather shoe (DlLg-33:93B/129). An unmarked, black bakelite pipestem (DlLg-33:93B/4) was assigned to the Recreation category.

Page 14: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

Two other artifacts represent Food Processing. These include a corroded, incomplete knife blade (DlLg-33:93B/211) which is 23.7 mm wide and 2.3 mm thick. A more recent fork, DlLg-33:93B15, was also recovered. This specimen is embossed with the trade name "MINUET STAINLESS" and the country of manufacture "HONG KONG". A scroll-like impressed design occurs on the perimeter of the handle.

While most unidentifiable fragments were not curated, some specimens of Detritus were retained. These consist of one copper fragment, one flat iron fragment, one angle iron fragment, three bakelite fragments, one tin sheet fragment, and one lead sheet fragment.

Glass sherds from storage Containers, i.e., bottles and jars, were one of the more prevalent recoveries. Specimens occurred in several colours and will be discussed within colour groups.

Nine sherds are olive. One specimen (DlLg-33:93B13) has the vertically striated flat side of a case gin bottle. Another sherd (DlLg-33:93B/319) is the lip,wllar,neck portion of a liquor bottle, which has an applied stopper finish with a V-shaped string rim surmounting a bulged neck (Jones and Sullivan 198599-97). The remaining specimens are round body or neck sherds.

The three amethyst sherds consist of one basal fragment (DlLg-33:93B135) and two ground lip sherds (DlLg-33:93B/204,253). The lip sherds represent a wide-mouthed, short-necked bottle. The two green specimens are a pale green basal sherd (DlLg-33:93B1212) from a rectangular bottle and a dark, almost opaque body,base sherd (DlLg-33:93B1318) from a circular liquor bottle.

One multi-coloured sherd (DlLg-33:93B1257), consisting of a red and white painted pattern on clear glass, derives from a Pepsi-Cola bottle. The text "...I COLA" is also embossed on the sherd.

One sherd of translucent, milky white glass, DlLg-33:93B/20, appears to represent a bottle. The glass of the twelve other white sherds have the density and appearance of cosmetic jars. No specimens are diagnostic, although one sherd (DlLg-33:93B121) is a lip,body fragment which indicates that it would be closed with an outer ring lid.

Brown glass consisted of one complete bottle (DlLg-33:93B1317) and nine sherds. The bottle was produced by McDonagh & Shea (Type MWIN BC6 Chopping 1978:137). One sherd (DlLg- 33:93B1148) is the lip,neck,shoulder sherd from a small flask-type bottle and three other sherds (DlLg-33:93B/315) are the oval edge of a larger flask-type bottle. The remaining sherds are undiagnostic body or base sherds.

A total of 22 aqua glass sherds were recovered. Thirteen are undiagnostic body or neck sherds. Three specimens have an intact lip and finish. One, DlLg-33:93B1275, is the bulbous rounded finish of a Hutchinson stopper type, although the remnant of the neck appears more elongate than usual. A second has a flat patent lip (DlLg-33:93B/202). The third @1Lg-33:93B1256) has a flat, two-part stopper finish applied to a short neck, surmounting a flask-shaped body. Four sherds have embossing. The numbers "6-9", in a very small font, are located just above the base junction of one sherd @1Lg-33:93B1314). The text, "E.L.DREWR ..." is embossed on a shoulder sherd (DlLg-

Page 15: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

33:93B/94), identifying the bottle as a product of Drewry Brewery, albeit not identifiable to a 1 Chopping Type. A body ,base sherd (DlLg-33:93B/93) has " . . .UR PROPERTY/. . .EREFOR"

embossed on the side and ". . . WR.. ." embossed on the base, again identifying a Drewry product.

I A small base sherd (DlLg-33:93B/41) has the embossed letters "DR ..." and represents another Drewry bottle.

A total of 35 clear glass sherds were curated. Twenty-four are plain body sherds, two of which are partially melted. Only a few specimens had markings andlor characteristic features which would permit determination of function. Three specimens appear to be portions of milk bottles as indicated by vertical panels (DlLg-33:93B/293), a recessed lip of a large milk bottle (DlLg-33:93B/290), and embossing on wide vertical panels (DlLg-33:93B/77). The latter sherd has a lower case script ". . .NT" embossed on a wide-panelled surface, indicating that it represents a different milk bottle than the earlier noted sherds (DlLg-33:93B1293 and 290), which have narrow panels. The other functionally ascribable artifacts are DlLg-33:93B/75, a crown lip from a carbonated beverage bottle, and DlLg-33:93B/322, a partially melted, thick-walled body sherd which has "INKS" embossed horizontally on it in large print, indicating the contents.

Some clear specimens could be identified to type, including a vertical ground lip from a wide- I mouth jar (DlLg-33:93B/95), a flat, two-part stopper finish (DlLg-33:93B/320) identical to a similar I aqua specimen, and a rounded applied single ring lip (DlLg-33:93B/321). Manufacturing technology

could be discerned from a basal sherd (DlLg-33:93B/294) from a large bottle which shows evidence

i of two-piece post mold. In addition to the aforementioned milk bottle sherds, a decorative molding pattern of horizontal ribs was evident on DlLg-33:93B1323. Locations of manufacture could be

I determined from two specimens: the embossed milk bottle sherd (DlLg-33:93B/77) which derives from the Crescent Diary in Winnipeg and a neck,shoulder sherd (DlLg-33:93B/17) which has "...E IN U.. ." , possibly a reference to the United States.

I

1 Two distinct sherds were assigned to the ornamental Container category. One sherd, DlLg-33:93BI- 206, is from a blue fluted bowl and the other sherd (DlLg-33:93B/98) derives from a bowl

i decorated with pale blue raised ribs on a yellowish-green background. I

Stoneware storage containers are represented by nine sherds. A brown body,base sherd (DlLg-

1 33:93B/194) is part of a stoneware bottle. One yellow sherd (DlLg-33:93B/156) and three grey 1 sherds (DlLg-33:93B/8, 312) represent at least three different crocks, while four sherds (DlLg-

33:93B/247, 311) come from two-tone brown and grey wloured jugs. I

A total of 37 porcelain dinnerware sherds were recovered. The preponderance (23) are plain, undecorated white sherds deriving from bowls, cups, plates, and saucers. One lip,body sherd from a plate (DlLg-33:93B/159) has a trace of an embossed pattern and four lip,body sherds from a cup (DlLg-33:93B/221) have a 'wheat' pattern embossed below the lip above a wide-ribbed body. This pattern most closely resembles an illustration of the wheat pattern produced by Robert Cochran (1863-1896) (Sussman 1985:20-21). One sherd, DlLg-33:93B/157, has a thin painted gold line on the lip and derives from a cup. Two sherds from a bowl? have portions of a red floral design on the body (DlLg-33:93B/84, 158) with a red line below the lip on one of the sherds. A body sherd,

Page 16: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

ealsad!d ugoq e jo uog~od 1pes e Lq w u a s a ~ d a ~ slam sag!Ag:,e @uogea13ax ' ( P z z / ~ E ~ : E E - % I ~ ) uollnq ywqs raddo:, aIqeuj pue papouoa Lla~a~as auo Lq paluasardas sem hro%alm %u!qlol3 aqL

~ w e ~ n : , aJam (181/g~6:~£-%11Q) alp lahas e)lme*Iq jo luae%e~j e pue 'de~:,s uor! papoll03 JO IU~W%€%J aU0 '%u!ddeJls UOJ! pa1101 'papollo3 30 SUOg3aS SlyJ, ' (~~z /~E~:EE-%' I I ( I ) sse12 n e ~ d aq 01 q%noua yqql s! q3ym jo auo L~uo 'sassaq3!yl % y h n z ~ jo auedmopu!~ enbe jo suae!mds ual am a1aqL . s p u lqkolm-pueq ssalpeaq om1 pue 'perq lq%norm-pueq e ' p u ln:, -1aaqs peaq-asor e se pagguap! are s ~ p u Jnoj aqL 'alg ramas pue '%u!dd~s uor! ' ~ W ~ M O ~ U ! M ' s p u apnpu! sl3arqg @mn13;31!q:,rv uaalau!u aqL 'supwax punea pue ' iauyuo3 'uogwr3a~ '%u!qo13 'l3arqg @lnl3aqq31v jo sauo8qe3 peo~q aql 8uguasardar sl3ejg.x~ 621 paplaj uozuoq s!q&

.s11os aql q ? ~ %uop pa:,elds!p uaaq aAeq pInom s13q9.1~ 'earn p r e ~ ~ s e g ayl jo Joualu! aw olu! ~~uam!~as aaAa1 aql palpodapa~ aAeq pinom eare yueqlaau aql%u!na~cq .uogda~xa ue IOU L~qeqord SEM au!oq!u!ssv aql pue syueq qayl jo a%pa aql le aaAa1 pnleu paleaaIa ue aaeq slaau ISOM

meld yo01 '%uglg ~aaer% pue %u!pe.x% '.a+! 'uoge:,g!poe puel aIqerap!suo:, ieql salou (0~1:0861) u u p ~ . u ? ~ pue J ~ E M jo uog:,un[ aqi IE lodap aql 01 se 11am se %u!pl!nq s!ql q p x szm y a u ~ 'asnoqpunox pue ( % ~ p ~ n g 8 ~ 8 aql se umoq mou) Xl!lped .rpdax au!%ua aql pal3axa p e o q ~ ~ ayl 'Lwdeo3 Lea s,uospnH aql eo1j pue1 jo aseq3md am 1313~ '6881 pue 8881 %uI.'~P P ~ O ~ I T ~ X eqo l rue~ pue 3 g ~ e d waqvoN ayl Lq uawapun sag!~g:,e uoge3g!poe pue~ pg!u! luasardar 01 m d d e pinom I! ' u o g o ~ q q d e ~ % g e ~ ~ s SI! uodn pasea .sl:,ej!m 3uo1s!q %u!uyuo3 111s LaLep umorq-h% e 30 L ~ p e u d pals!suo:, mnleJls 11g LEI:, aqL

(Z auo~) uoz!JoH 12!d b13 Z'E'E

.pnp!A!pu! alnleee! ue e o ~ j ( ~ 6 / 8 ~ 6 : ~ ~ - % - d ) l~aLU%~lj UIN3ES aU0 SE IIaM SE ' ~ 0 3 lInpE UE UJOlJ ( ~ ~ z / ~ E ~ : E E - % ~ I ( I ) ssa:,old @lqaPaA Pyme-ln3 e Pue '(9£1/8~6:££-~?1a[) 1nWaJ 30 UOg3as UMB e ' (IoI/BE~:EE-%?I~) s n h 3 auln auo ' ( 1 6 / 8 ~ 6 : ~ ~ - % [ a ) sluae%e~j ~ l q s OMI apnpu! suam!ds ~L~:,epogn aqL ~elD3epog~v woij %u!auap suae!mds x!s pue ' p e e e e azre1 eo13 (LEI ' O ~ / ~ £ ~ : E E - % - I I ~ ) s~uae%eg auoq zuol Pue (68/8£6:£~-zTIQ) ssam~d @IqaUaA auo '(88 ' ~ 8 '1 I / B E ~ : E E - ~ T ~ ) IIaYs (aep!uo!un) we13 lalemqsarj jo sluaw%elj aa~q l jo ls!suo:, uozuoq s ! ~ e o l j sauaAom1 punej aqL

.uam!ds q!qm dl@u!%uo ue 01 uo!le~qp peraql l o @3!waq:, jo lInsar aql aq Lee q q m jo p 'par y l ! ~ umo~q-La~% S! (zz /~Q~:EE-%I~) 1moq e e o l j praqs Lpoq yqql v ir~no~o:,s!p 01 plaqs aql pasne:, seq arg o$ a~nsodxa lnq parno~o:,glne uaaq Llpu!%uo aAeq lCeu waled s!q~ .u%!sap aql i?u!qno ~ 1 0 % anbgdde seq (EIE/~E~:EE-%I& lanes e e o r j plaqs aqqm-uo-an~q qewo u v ' (~6:e~661 hrpunof) pue layoq) amhuaump peor.[px uIawoN w!peue3 se I! Ljguap! q q m saug anIq aql seq pue aleld e e o y saauap ' E I / ~ E ~ : E E - % T ~ ~ 'psays al!qm-uo-an~q puo3as aqL .u%!sap m u a m ue jo uog~od e seq ( P L Z / ~ E ~ : E E - % T I ~ ) slams e eo1j praqs Lpoq qqm-uo-an~q auo 'aseq pue roualu! q!qm e pue Jouqxa uax% e seq ~moq mo~pqs e eol3 (£8/8£6:££-%1a) P l W aseq1L~q"h V ' ( ~ 9 1 :e£661 hr~unof) Pue lay or>^) L ~ M I ? ~ UJaqUoN ue!peue3 ayl %quasasdal se pagguap! Llsno!aa~d s a q uaar% w u p d a q seq ' z I / ~ E ~ : E E - % ~ I ( I

Page 17: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I Containers were strongly represented with 96 sherds representing storage and dinnerware sub- I categories. Most of the specimens ascribed to the storage sub-category were made of glass,

although one sherd of glazed terracotta deriving from a flowerpot (DlLg-33:93B/226) falls within this grouping. The glass sherds are various colours: white (3), dark olive (Z), light olive (I) , green (I), amethyst (I), brown (I), aqua (12), and clear (11). Minimal diagnostic evidence was present to ascertain type of bottle or temporal period of manufacture. Two of the clear basal sherds (DlLg-

I 33:93B/172, 173) appear to represent square or rectangular medicine bottles. A clear lip sherd, DlLg-33:93B/259, has a ground lip and multiple string collar with a constricting neck. The amethyst sherd, DlLg-33:93B1327, has a ground lip and a mold seam extending to the top of the

I short vertical neck.

The 63 dinnerware specimens were all made of porcelain except for a single, pale brown, stoneware sherd from a bowl (DlLg-33:93B/177). There are 40 undecorated white sherds, representing plates (3), saucers (3), plate?/saucer? (12), cup (I), bowl? (13), bowl?lcup? (Z), and unidentified (6). All sherds were undiagnostic except for two small basal specimens (DlLg-

I 33:93B/263) which have portions of a post-1837 British Royal Crest imprinted in black. The fragments are too incomplete to ascertain the manufacturer. According to Kovel (1986:267), in addition to many English companies using variations of the Royal Crest, many potteries in other

1 countries also utilized the crest. Therefore, these sherds cannot be definitely ascribed to an English firm. Five other white sherds have traces of embossed designs, one has a floral pattern (DlLg- 33:93B/232) while four others have a leaf and hops pattern @1Lg-33:93B/184). Two sherds have

I portions of different red-on-white designs: one is a thin pale red line @1Lg-33:93B/174) while the other is a leaf (DlLg-33:93B/105). A single sherd, DlLg-33:93B/175, has a portion of a green-on- white line drawing of an uninterpretable pattern. Two sherds have portions of purple-on-white

1 designs. One is a plate?/saucer? lip sherd with a line overlying interlocking horizontal "S's" (DlLg- 33:93B/176). The other is a basal sherd with a vague impression of a stylized butterfly (DlLg- 33:93B/231). Two yellow and white body sherds appear to derive from the same bowl (DlLg-

I 33393B1107, 284). Ten blue-on-white sherds represent three different patterns: a white honeycomb on a purplish blue band on the interior of a saucer lip (DlLg-33:93B/229), a pale blue floral pattern on the interior base of a plate?lsaucer? @lLg-33:93B/230), and an indistinct blue pattern on both

1 sides of the body of a plate?lsaucer? (DlLg-33:93B/300).

I The faunal assemblage was dominated by large mammalian bone. These were identified where I possible and are listed in Table 1. Most of the 35 specimens were too fragmented to permit

identification beyond family. The Leporidae specimen could derive from Lepur (jackrabbit) or

i Sylvilagus (snowshoe hare). Pig was the only species that could be positively identified, although most of the Artiodactyla (cow/moose/eIk family) specimens probably derive from domestic cow. Based upon the recoveries, at least four individuals are represented - one adult and one immature ~ pig and one adult and one immature Artiodactyla. Given the relocation of the specimens, it is impossible to ascertain whether they represent a single occupation or several. The inclusion of a heavily weathered specimen with others that show minimal evidence of weathering suggests different sources for the material, both temporal and locational. The sawing and the species identification suggests that most of the specimens derive from food processing activities which

Page 18: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

occurred after Contact and may relate to the occupation of Fort Gibraltar I1 (Fort Garry I) after I I 1817.

i In addition to the mammal specimens shell and fish remains were also recovered. Two small valve fragments from freshwater clam (Unionidae) were identified @1Lg-33:93B1227). The fish remains consist of a fused dentarylangular @lLg-33:93B/331) and a dorsal spine (DlLg-33:93B1332) from a catfish (Ictalurus sp.), an operculum unidentified to species @1Lg-33:93B1269), and two unidentifiable fragments @1Lg-33:93B1270).

1 Table 1: Mammal Remains From the Clay Fill Horizon (Zone 2)

r

TAXON

Mammal (Undiff.) Medium Mammal Artiodactyla

Juvenile

Adult

Pig (Sus scrofa) Immature Adult

Rabbit (kporidae)

CAT.NO.

28 188

287 267 334 302 186 333

286,266 103 187 102 301 185 189 29

335 336 228

268 26 27

ELEMENT

Unidentified Rib

Humerus Sacrum Long Bone Long Bone Vertebra Carpus Innominate Scapula Rib Rib Rib 3rd Phalanx Long Bone Long Bone Unidentified Unidentified Unidentified

Fibula Innominate Femur

QTY

1 1

1 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 2 1

1 1 1

-

COMMENTS

Calcined Sawn

Cut Fragmented

Sawn

Sawn Sawn Sawn

Weathered

Calcined Charred

Cut Marks

Page 19: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I 3.3.3 Experimental Farm Plow Zone (Zone 3)

The plow zone was continuous across the investigation area except where it had been disrupted by 1 the installation of watermain and sewer lines @re-1962). The 89 artifacts consist of metal, glass, I and ceramic material with the preponderance of recoveries being faunal.

I The Architectural Objects consist of three hand-wrought nails and one fragment of chinking. A partially decomposed fragment of a possible post (DlLg-33:93B1161) was recovered at 25.00N. The wood has been identified as ash (Frarinus sp.). The top of the post was truncated at the clay

I horizon immediately overlaying the plow zone. Current interpretation is that the post is part of a fence line which was eradicated during the 1852 or subsequent floods.

I Two artifacts catalogued as Recreation items are kaolin pipe stem fragments (DlLg-33:93B/120, I 236). D1Lg-33:93B/120 has a portion of the maker's mark, "...Nu, which may denote Bannerman

of Montreal (Kroker et al. 1991:113-114). Ceramic containers were represented by two white I porcelain sherds (DlLg-33:93B1141) with no identifying marks on them, two blue-on-white I fragments of an exfoliated plate with an oriental (Blue Willow?) pattern (D1Lg-33:93B1306), and

one blue-on-whitecup sherd with an unidentifiableembossed blue pattern (DlLg-33:93B/142). Glass

1 containers were represented by one aqua and one white sherd. Both are more than likely intrusive 1 into this horizon.

I

I The majority of the artifacts (75) recovered in the plow zone were faunal with mammalian remains being most strongly represented (Table 2). These consist of fragmented material, some of which

! show cut marks, saw marks, charring, andlor calcining. Identifications indicated the presence of large Artiodactyla (domestic cattle, bison, or moose), small Artiodactyla (sheep or pig), and undifferentiated large mammal. One specimen (DlLg-33:93B/58), the upper front jaw and incisors,

I could be identified to sheep. The horn core, DlLg-33:93B1113, is representative of Bovidae, either

1 bison or domestic cow. Other specimens which could be identified to Artiodactyla include elements of adult large Artiodactyla, juvenile large Artiodactyla, and adult small Artiodactyla (sheep or pig).

1 Adult large artiodactyl elements consist of one fragmented scapula, one molar, one phalanx, one 1 rib, two vertebrae, and eleven carpus?ltarsus?. Juvenile large artiodactyl specimens include one

femur, one humerus, one tibia, and one vertebra. Adult small artiodactyl is represented by one

I ulna. The undifferentiated specimens of large mammal were identified as three skull fragments, one costal cartilage, nineteen rib fragments, eight long bone fragments, and sixteen unidentifiable fragments.

I 1 Other classes of recovered fauna include freshwater clam (one specimen of Unionidae - DlLg-

33:93B/237), bird (one scapula from a medium sized individual - DlLg-33:93B/117), and fish (one I preoperculum from an unidentified species - DlLg-33:93B/246, and one scute from a sturgeon - 1 DlLg-33:93B/140).

Page 20: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I Table 2: Mammal Remains From the Plow Zone Horizon (Zone 3)

TAXON ELEMENT CAT.NO. QTy COMMENTS

3.3.4 Recent Watermain Fill Deposits (Zone 4)

i The 67 artifacts within the watermain fill deposits represent material which was initially removed for laying the water pipe and then redeposited into the excavation trench. This operation appears

I to have taken place after the 1930s and would have resulted in mixing of earlier and later cultural I deposits. The artifacts from this zone, therefore, have minimal archaeological value inasmuch as

they are removed from even their original secondary context. I

Calcined, Fragmented

Axe Cut Axe Cut

Cut, Axe Cut Cut Cut marks

Mammal - large

Artiodactyla Juvenile - large

Adult - large

Adult - small Cow Family (Bovidae) Sheep (Ovis)

1 Architectural objects consist of thirteen aqua windowpane sherds, one hand-wrought nail, five sheet- cut nails, and an iron rope cleat, DLg-33:93B/70 (cf. Ashdown 1909:371). The nails would have been manufactured in the latter part of the 19th century. No age determinations are available for the other specimens.

I Two other metal artifacts were recovered. An unidentified iron handle, DlLg-33:93B/33, consisting of a round curved rod with a terminal hook and a proximal grip shaped like a boot last, was recovered from a depth of 198 cm. This specimen probably derives from machinery related to

I railroad activities or the adjacent Hudson's Bay Company flour mill. The remaining metal object is an iron strap with an attached chain @1Lg-33:93B/57) which appears to be the base portion of

Costal Cartilage Skull Rib

Long Bone

Unidentified

Femur Humerus Tibia Vertebra Scapula Molar Phalanx Carpus?/Tarsus? Vertebra Rib Ulna Horn Core Maxilla

215 114, 163, 243 115, 166, 218, 240, 241, 272 165, 190, 217, 242, 245, 303 116, 138, 139, 244, 304

164 112 239 238 192 162 27 1 191 111, 216 214 213 113 58

- 1 3

19

8

16

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

11 2 1 1 1 1

Page 21: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

a small game trap (cf. Ashdown 1909:555-556). This specimen may date to the Fur Trade period, although it may have been used for rodent control at any time during the Railroad period.

Fragments of ceramic and glass containers were recovered. The eleven ceramic sherds, representing bowls? or saucers?, provided minimal data concerning time period or manufacturer. Seven sherds are white, three consist of blue-on-white patterns (DlLg-33:93B/51, 66, 67), and one has a green and red floral pattern on a white background @Lg-33:93B152). No maker's marks were evident and the sherds were too small to allow pattern identification.

The glass sherds represent varying sizes of bottles of different colours (four clear, one green, one olive, and six aqua). With a few exceptions, the specimens were not ascribable to a manufacturer or type of container. DlLg-33:93B165 is the body,base portion of an E.L. Drewry bottle (Chopping type not determinable). DLg-33:93B1121, a body sherd, has "...RE..." embossed on it. This may also be a Drewry bottle. DlLg-33:93B/122 has "TH.. ." and "WI. .." embossed on a body sherd. In all likelihood, this sherd was produced by a Winnipeg firm but the company cannot be identified.

Faunal recoveries consist of only a few specimens. Fish are represented by four unidentified bone fragments plus two samples of scales which had been collected from two small isolated pockets of scale deposits. Large mammal remains consist of two rib fragments and one unidentifiable specimen. A phalanx (DlLg-33:93B154) could be identified as large Artiodactyla and a horn core fragment (DlLg-33:93B/72) is from a bovid (cow or bison). A medium to large carnivore is represented by a maxilla fragment with an embedded third molar. The artiodactyl and bovid specimens may represent domestic cattle and the carnivore specimen probably derives from dog.

3.4 Stratigraphy Vertical profiles were recorded at numerous locations along each trench. In general, these were taken at 2.5 meter separations. The composite profiles are illustrated in Figure 4 (northlsouth trench) and Figure 5 (easffwest trench).

The upper strata, relating to the railroad period, are generally similar. A sod stratum overlies black cinder fill which in turn overlies an intermediate layer of gravel and sand. A second layer of black railroad cinder deposit, containing historic artifacts extends to a depth of nearly 100 centimeters. Below the second cinder horizon, a layer of light brown sand was present in the easffwest trench while an equivalent layer of fine gravel occurred in the northlsouth trench.

Two extensive pre-rail horizons were evident in both trenches. A relatively thin mixed clay layer occurred at the base of the railroad period deposits. This 'Clay Fill' stratum thickens to the north. It contained a series of artifacts which appear to represent the late 19th century. Given the stratigraphic position of this horizon, it probably relates to the grading and levelling activities of the Northern Pacific and Manitoba Railroad when it began preparing the site in 1888 (Guinn 1980:140). The artifacts may derive from the Fort Gibraltar IIlFort Gany site which is hypothesized to have been situated on the north bank of the Assiniboine River, immediately south of the assessment trenches. This stratum is probably the same as the layer which was encountered

Page 22: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program
Page 23: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program
Page 24: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

lay3nq aql jo uo!sualxa IInj a q 01 pa)eAeDxa sem q3uaa Isampsea a q JO pua walsam a q 'uozuoq 3~q31v a q ale301 01 ldwalle ue u~ 'saq3uaa luawssasse aql JO u o g m ~ a q le uaplnqxaAo 30 qldap lalea13 e lapun paunq s! uozuoq q ~ q 3 ~ v a q l eq maw dew qqqm '$sea aql pm quou a q 01 %u!do~s IaAaI pun018 e luasa~da~ Lew LI!A!IXI~ s!ql ' d~a~gewaqv '(.p.u h p u n o ~ pm l ayoq) (MPEOIINIPOI) uogeAe3xa d%o1oaeq31v q q n d ~ 6 6 1 a q JO Jaww ~ s e a q ~ ~ o u a q le paruasqo sew '~auwq:, m a s molpqs e se q3ns 'a1nleaj aJuo!soIa ue aq dew yqqm LI!AIJXI~ h q s v '(81 arn%!d :6861 1aqorX) (MLIOIINSPOI) luawssassv a P N au!oq!u!ssv WON a q 30 8 q3ua1~ 1e papIom1 uaaq seq uozuoq 3 ~ q 3 r v aql jo uo!suqxa walsea lsom aqL '(€661 h w a l e n b !q€661 k p u n o ~ ) pue layom kc661 h p u n o ~ pue l a y o q to661 h p u n o ~ pue l a q o q f6861 1aqorX) al!sdurm pue a n u s ape4 3 ~ 1 1 3 1 ~ PIO ml( OOOE a q 10 '(9~661 Lpunog pue ~axor>T) I a u w p a (SZI -LI I :e£661 fipuno9 Pue 1aqorX) V dmQI le uogednm PI0 m.4 OOZZ aql '(1~1-OSI :6861 1a~orX) luaurssassv apON au!oq!u!ssv WON a q jo 8 q 3 u a ~ . lo (0661 '10 n s m p v ) aapN lqod WON le pap103a1 suogedn330 3!m~a:, 13quo3-a~d agl q!m pqelauo3 aq m suozuoq 110s PIIaJ a q Jo auou 'uo!l!PPe UI '(~91-991:e£661 hpun00 Pue laToz>I !€VI :066T fipun00 P a 1a~oJX) PooId BA OSL am pue (8~130661 A P U ~ O D pue ~ a y o q :LI aln%!d:6861 1axorX) u o z u o ~ v alqnoa aq) :luasqe $ram mws umoq r(~sno!~ard 'pugs!p o w -s)s[o~d Iaqo % v n p pap1ow1 suozuoq 110s pqa1 ram0 01 pqug Lnuapyuw aq m suozyoq a q JO auou p w suozuoq ~ o s pun[s!p asaql jo 1(ue $ 1 ~ uon=!msse q ~ u a s a ~ d S ~ M pualeur m l n 3 ON 'us3 soz 01 uo 081 moIj %u!%ue1 qdap e le (S a i n ~ ! ~ ) qmaa isampma aql u! paruasqo sem uozyoq ~ o s laga1 ar\!suqxa lsom aqA 'pun[s!p pw (w3 1 m q ssa~) u!yl a n elens asaq 30 1~ .q3uaq qnoslylrou a q jo suoyod paqlnlsipun aq) U! pue q3uaa vampsea aql jo uoyod w a l m a q u! paruasqo aram suozpoq 110s PgaI 30 sa3eIL

' , a u g ~ 0 1 6 , a q o ly pa~erodrwu! uaaq seq L~qeqo~d 11 'qyl L1a~ge1a1 s! ~!sodap a q IaAalam '(6~1:0661 h p u n o ~ pue layo* m 1 8 o ~ d 8 u u o l ~ o t y I a % a s aw %uwp pue (0661 'ID la s m p v ) aapN ~ y o d WON it! papma1 uaaq seq 11 .au!oq~!ssv a q JO qmq quou a q m u lo le lunl:UIIaIu! s! uozuoq p m 9281 aqL '(2661 'lo la Jaqoq 11661 'ID la Jayoq 10661 la layom f9861 -10 la ss!a~d) al!s I m p z q ! ~ a q le pap10~1.1 uaaq seq l a h 1 p m s g ~ ' p m 30 wnlws 73% e Lq paluasardar ualjo s! pue m n g puamuadxg a q jo ~uaurqs~~qe]sa a q ol loud p a 3 3 0 (9281) poop paplorn1 lsaJea18 aqA 'pquasardar saposyda poop aa.~ql I@ a n 'uoge~ol ou u! 'pue snonuguw IOU a n suozuoq a q uaawaq mvx~s yq aqA 'ZS81 pue '1981 $2881 :qeas OM] a q dq w u a s a ~ d a ~ samg a q uaawaq paprom a n spoop ~o[em a a q ~ " a u g mo~d, pue ' I I ! ~ de13, aql uaamlaq paruasqo aJam 'uoguno1w 3!ue%~o 1481~s ~I!M '111s JO sndel u y ~

'(~91/9~6:€£-%Tld F SE PLJPuaP? P m P338IIO3 SEM ]sod qaldmw alom a q JO uoyod v x ~ n l w p a q JO do] a q le ~ m u w aIam inq , a u g mold, a q q % n o q papualxa slsod a m w a q uaawaq uogmdas IWJ ar\Iaw e q ~ m '(p am%!& q3ua.11 qlnoslqtrou a q ~ j o pua ~ o u a q u! paIalunwua aIam slsod o w JO s)ueuuraI pa1101 aqA '(1~81-9~81) m a @)uamuadxg duedwo3 Lea s,uospnH a q JO sagpg3e @mqnau%e a q 01 8uge1a1 , a u g mold, a q luasa~da~ 01 pamaap s! uozyoq s w 's13ejg.m & u s q61 pue i sup ma^ punej 'po~nq:, jo a~nlx!urpe ue q ~ m rCep h ~ s U M O I ~ ynp jo pap!sum 'y3!q w3 oz 01 01 'uozuoy ~adaap v

Page 25: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

arm of the backhoe (330 cm). No relict soils or cultural horizons were observed. It would seem that the Archaic horizon is not present at this location or, if so, is more deeply buried.

I Extensive recent disturbance was observed at the north end of the northlsouth trench, the centre of

I the northlsouth trench, and the centre of the eastlwest trench. These disturbed zones were capped by a portion of the railroad deposits (Figure 4; Figure 5). The extent of the disturbance, within the

I assessment trenches, is due to the assessment trench crossing the original disturbance at an oblique 1 angle (Figure 6). The recent disturbance at the centre of the northlsouth trench was due to the

placement of a currently abandoned water line. This iron pipe was encountered at a depth of 285

i cm dbs at 14.0 north.

Investigation of earlier maps of the East Yard indicate that a water hydrant was located to the south I of the centre of the assessment trenches (Figure 6). This hydrant would have been linked to the I internal water system and most likely to the hydrant located between the Stables and the Johnston

Terminal. In addition, two outflow pipes are marked on early maps - a 6" pipe from the Johnston Terminal to the Assiniboine River, lying to the west of the Low Line Bridge track, and a 6" pipe from former buildings along the west bank of the Red River, extending into the Red River. Neither sub-surface pipe would be located within the area of the assessment trenches. It is probable that the

1 recent disturbance was a result of the trenching for the placement of the fire hydrants, which are marked on a 1962 map but not on a 1947 map. However, the 1947 map is a generalized site map providing locational context for the construction of the Steam Plant. The absence of the hydrants

I on this map does not mean that they could not have been in place at that time.

I 3.5 Discussion I

A sub-surface feature is proposed for the southern portion of The Forks Heritage Plaza. Several I archaeological horizons are known to occur outside the periphery of this circular area. Within the

assessment trenches, three cultural horizons were observed: the railroad strata, the 'Clay Fill' stratum, and the Hudson's Bay Company 'Plow Zone'. Artifacts within these three layers are not

1 representative of in situ activities, but rather secondary or even tertiary deposition. I

The re-deposition aspect is most notable in the lower two strata, wherein ground disturbance 1 activities - ploughing and grading - result in artifacts being moved from one location to another, 1 often more than once. This relocation of artifacts eliminates their connection with the original

activities. Thus, the artifacts become less significant in an archaeological sense, as the direct link I I between the artifacts and the activities of the people who used them has been broken. Interpretation i of cultural behaviour based upon this relocated material becomes more tenuous.

I i

The presence of pre-1988 disturbance was noted when the assessment trenches encountered locations of recent fill below the cinder and gravel layers (Figure 4, Figure 5). Using maps, dating between 1947 and 1988, the probable location of sub-surface water pipelines has been plotted

I (Figure 6). In addition, the hydrant from the 1962 map is plotted and linked to the main waterline by a dashed line indicating the most probable route. Using the same scale and grid orientation, the locations of the impact assessment trenches have been superimposed upon the map.

Page 26: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program
Page 27: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

Finally, the locations of the 'Recent Disturbance' strata are marked on the trenches. There is minimal congruence between the waterline locations as derived from early maps and the observed areas of disruption during the assessment. This leads to the hypothesis that the early maps are 'planning maps' or 'long-after-the-fact best-guess maps' rather than 'as-built maps'. It could also

I mean surveying errors, either then or now. If the location of the waterline route is displaced eastward on the map by approximately eight meters, the route coincides fairly closely with the

I locations of 'Recent Disturbance' sediments. There may have been a bend or angle in the waterline, 1 to enable linkage with the hydrant.

In addition to the hydrant, the 1962 map shows the presence of oil tanks, one quarter of the distance between the hydrant and the southeastern corner of the B&B Annex. When placed on the composite map (Figure 6), they seem to be located at the eastern edge of the orrery. Sub-surface impact occurred at this location in 1988 when the tanks, and their concrete supporting structures, were removed by CN. It is worth noting that two Pre-Contact cultural strata were recorded within the severely diesel fuel-stained soil - at 254 cm and 286 cm dbs (Kroker 1988). Considerable fish bone and scale were in these strata and they may be temporally similar to the two Archaic strata identified in the FRC Archaeological Preserve.

I Given the results of the impact assessment, it can be stated that the major Archaic cultural horizon does not extend into the potential zone of sub-surface impact. Inasmuch as the depth of impact is to be two meters or less below surface, the assessment trenches investigated the sediments for a

I considerable distance below probable impact. This was done for two reasons: to determine if the Archaic horizon was present and to ensure that the assessment investigation exceeded the probable

I depths of potential impact by a considerable margin.

1 The absence of cultural resources in strata below the HBC Experimental Farm Plow Zone does not indicate that the area was not utilized during the Pre-Contact period. Small localized activity areas

I I or campsites could occur within the impact zone and were sited such that they were not encountered

by the assessment trenches. However, the absence of cultural resources in the relict soil horizons does indicate that extensive campsites and occupation areas, such as the Archaic horizon or the

I ceramic horizons at North Point Node, do not extend throughout the impact zone.

3.6 Recommendations As noted above, extensive Pre-Contact occupations do not occur within the impact zone. However, as the absence of cultural resources within the assessment trenches only precludes extensive horizons, the presence of small campsites or activity areas associated with any or all of the archaeological occupations known on the periphery of the area must still be considered as a distinct possibility. Accordingly, Quaternary Consultants Limited recommends that:

1. any excavation below the railroad strata (gravels, sands, and cinders) be monitored by archaeologists;

2. the archaeological monitoring team be empowered to relocate or stop construction activities if archaeological resources are encountered; and

3. adequate funding be available for mitigative action, if required.

Page 28: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

4.0 Monitoring of the Cobblestone Court Sub-surface impact in the cobblestone court portion of the plaza consisted of relocation of an existing manhole and drilling holes for the footings of five lamp standards. Considerable impact has already taken place within this area during the Stage I services installation (Kroker and Goundry 1990) and the extension of services to the B&B Building for the Childrens Museum development (Quaternary n.d.).

Archaeological monitoring of the auger drilling of the hard court plaza manhole was anticipated. The initial location of the manhole was adjacent to or within an undisturbed area. The Senior Archaeologist was to be advised by the contractor prior to the drilling of this bore hole. As plans were modified, the siting of the manhole coincided with a previously disturbed area (Figure 7). The contractor contacted the Senior Archaeologist, after the operation had taken place, that the entire bore hole was within recent infill material (sands and gravels).

Figure 7: Location of Plaza Manhole and Lamp Standards

Page 29: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

.qsodap asnjal sty] 01 lua3erpe K~ae!pamm! IOU jnq Kqmu uaaq K~qeqold arlaq pInoM eale %U!A!I aqL .~!scdap uapp!m e K~q!ssod s e ~ s!yl l-eql ssla%%ns splays 3!urlzla3 so 'snlulap qqlg 's~ool jo y3e1 aqL 'luarla l3muoD-aid qe1 e sluasaidai pue 9 ~ 8 1 01 loud rllqa~ap!suo3 palin33o aAeq pInom ~ ~ s o d a p auoq aql leyl w e 3 : p ~ u o g m l c~!qdlzl%gws aqL 'auoz M O I ~

mred @luauruadxg ayl MoIaq in3m s[!os P![al a a q IIV '~!sodap auoq aql molaq laKe1 laqlow pw aAoqe 1aKe1 auo q l ! ~ uogeml s y l ?I! paNasqo aIam sauoz nos lq1aljo sauas v '(8 ain%!A) l!sodap aql jo a%pa waquou ayl uo 13edur! u! paqnsai peq uog~nrlsum loud '(8 ain%!d uozuoq I!OS 13ga.r e u!qqm pue uo %qKl 'uogenuauo3 p a z m ~ e moij p a ~ a r l m i slam suam!mds iyL

.uogrsodap @mleu JO lInsar a q IOU s! auaun330 s!ql leq isa%%ns Kpoq a q JO s u o ~ o d luasajj!p molj &uamaIa jo a3uasa1d aql p w suprual palays aqi jo ssaua1a1duro3u! aql 'sarlakoH VpaNasqo alaM 8uuaq3lnq JO suoge3!pu! i~ugs!p iaqlo 10 syleu11n3 ON .luasaid alaM sguqm ararlas jo suogexpu~ .luap!rla aiaM syeaiq p a p y ' p ~ o ieql u! 'p!%o~oqed aq 01 panaide auoq a u .uos!q uoqg K~qeqoid 'e[K~'~epog.~~ a%=[ se pagguap! aiaM asaqL '(SS - z P / ~ E ~ : E E - % T ~ ~ ) quawala vpp~ jo pa1s!suo3 (g x~puaddv) s a u a ~ m i aqL '@!mew punej aql q l ! ~ pale!3osse araM sl3ejg.m 3!ma3 io qylq ON '(9 am%!& uog~un[ 8188 aql jo qnos sIalaur 61 JO

a ~ s ! p e le m3 061 jo yldap e le palalunmua s e ~ Supural punej jo ~!sodap wurs e '6 lsn%nv uo

'suoplaprsum Klaps loj %u!dolq3eq alenbpe ainsua 01 pu!%uo aql ueql sap!M r(pq%!~s a1aM suogerlmxa a i l q%noqp 'a3wqlnls!p jo wre 8ugs!xa a q u!q]!m a q d yo01 uogerle3xa a q 'saS~3 lS0W UI '€667 '6 PIP2 9 i s n b v UO a q d YO01 %uuo~~uom ~ ! % O I O X ~ ~ X V 'S@U3lEKU MaU q l ! ~ I! %u!3eldai p w aloqueu! aql pue %u!pl!ng 8788 aql uaamlaq auy p ~ o aql %u!rlotuai JO pqs!suo3 uo!l3nllsuo3 aql p w auy %ugs!xa aql ioj luawmeldar I s n p a seM aug a%euprp p a 1 Mau aqL

.%u!p~!ng 8 ~ 8 aqlol la~pred %U!UUN aiojaq 'pu!uria~ uasuqo~ a q pue %u!pl!ng 8788 a q uaa~laq a ~ % w y e jo xade aql le aIoqmur e u! paIeupral uo!suqxa prem]slra aqL 'auoz luamdo1arlap aql U!~I!M paleu!mga SVM aug s!yl 'Keno luoipar\g au!oqN!ssv a q jo luawdoprlap %uuna '(81 asn%!j 'PI ain%!j '~91:6861 1ayoIx) luaurssassv apoN au!oq!u!ssv quo^ a q %uunp paraluno3ua uaaq peq aug pasnun aqJ '(9 ain%!& salqtqs a q jo ap!s qlnos a q 01 'pu!mraL uolsuqo~ a q jo qlnos '%pp~!na g ~ 8 aqi w o ~ j papualxa Klpu!%uo peq leq aug iaMas pau!quro3 pauopwqe ua sasqda~ auy mau s ! q ~ .L.xauo pasodold aql 01 uo!sualxa ue qsgqqsa 01 aIq!seaj K ~ ~ ~ ! U I O U O ~ ~ SEM I! leql pappap 13a1!q3re admspuel a q 'urnasn~ sualpI!qa a q roj saqluas alp aql jo m d se '%u!p1!n8 8788 a v 01 saw1 (~aMas w~ols) a 2 e u ~ r p pue~ jo uogel@lsu! a q q l ! ~ uog3un[u03 UI

.suozuoq l!os p!~ai jo suogm!pu! ou papy~o~d aIoq la%ne lsaMqlnos aqL 'ru s.1 jo yldap alem!xosdde ue le uozuoq pos paunq wugs!pu! m jo men iou!ur e p w sKep iaddn a q jo % m s Iasa!p palamnmua aloq ia%ne pwqnos aqL .sKe13 p w SICS

auuarlu aql u!q!m suozyoq l!os l q a r ro 3p%10 alqp.rms!p ou peq ap!s qpou aql uo saloq ra%ne a a q aqL 'pa~a~uno3ua asaM sluamrpas auuarlu pu!%uo 'm 2.1 jo qldap aglzlarle ue lv 'saq3uan luaurssasse ayl u! p a ~ g s q o q w s lapu!:, pue ~ ~ A E I % a q we3!1dar saIoq 1p uryl!~ suozuoq ~addn aql ley) u! re~!m!s SEM Kqdu%gaas aqL '(ma S'SZ) .OI seM rqam!p aloq aqL '(ur p'z) 1x3 8 30 qldap e 01 %uuoq la%ne par!nb~ (L a~n%!$) suogeml prepms d w e ~ arlg aql jo luaura3qd aqL

Page 30: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program
Page 31: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

6.0 Bibliography Adams, G. , K. Lunn, M. A. Tisdale and P. J. Priess

1990 Archaeological Investigations at the Forks National Historic Site, Winnipeg: Mitigation of the North Point Development. Environment Canada, Parks Service, Research Bulletin No. 283.

Ashdown Hardware Company

1909 Ashdown Catalogue. Ashdown Hardware Co., Winnipeg.

Chopping, Gwrge C.

1978 Bottles of the Canadian Prairies. Self-published: Gwrge C. Chopping, Spy Hill, Saskatchewan.

Forks Renewal Corporation, The

1988 m e Forks Archaeological Impact Assessment and Development Plan (The Forks Archaeological Plan). The Forks Renewal Corporation, Winnipeg.

Guinn, Rodger

1980 The Red-Assiniboine Junction: A Land Use and Structural History. Manuscript Report Series No. 355. Parks Canada. Ottawa.

HBT AGRA Limited

1993 Geotechnical Investigation Forks Market Road, Earth Sculpture and Orrery. Report on File with Hilderman Witty Crosby Hanna & Associates and The Forks Renewal Corporation.

Jones, Olive R. and Catherine Sullivan, et al.

1985 The Parks Canada Glass Glossary. Environment Canada, Parks Canada, National Historic Parks and Sites Branch.

Kovel, Ralph M. & Terry H. Kovel

1986 Kovels' New Dictionary of Marks. Crown Publishers, New York.

Page 32: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I 28

I Kroker, Sid

1988 Field Notes for the North Assiniboine Node Archaeological (NANA) Impact Assessment. I 1 1989 North Assiniboine Node Archaeological Impact Assessment. The Forks Renewal

Corporation, Winnipeg. 5

1 Kroker, Sid and Pamela Goundry

I 1990 Archaeological Monitoring of the Stage I Construction Program. The Forks Renewal Corporation, Winnipeg.

I I

1993a Archaeological Monitoring and Mitigan'on of the Assiniboine Rive@ont Quay. The Forks Renewal Corporation, Winnipeg.

1 1993b A 3000 Year Old Native Campsite and Trade Centre At Tke Forks. Compiled by Sid Kroker and Pam Goundry. The Forks Public Archaeological Association, Inc., Winnipeg.

I n.d. The 1993 Public Archaeology Project at The Forks. Compiled by Sid Kroker and Pam Goundry. The Forks Public Archaeological Association, Inc., Winnipeg. [In Preparation]

1 Kroker, Sid, Barry B. Greco, Arda Melikian and David K. Riddle

1990 The Forks (1989) Pilot Public Archaeology Project: Research Report Excavations at 21K (Fort Gibraltar I). Canadian Parks Services, Historic Resources Branch and The Forks Renewal Corporation, Winnipeg.

I

1 Kroker, Sid, Barry B. Greco and A. Kate Peach

I 1992 1991 Investigations at Fort Gibraltar I: The Forks Public Archaeology Project. The Forks Public Archaeology Association Inc., Winnipeg.

1 Kroker, Sid, Barry B. Greco and Sharon Thomson

1991 1990 Investigations at Fort Gibraltar I : The Forks Public Archaeology Project. Canadian

1 Parks Services, Historic Resources Branch and The Forks Renewal Corporation, Winnipeg.

Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature I I 1986 Guides and Manuals for Processing Archaeological Materials. E.L. Syms (Ed.). Winnipeg,

Manitoba. I

Page 33: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

29

Priess, Peter J., P. W. Nieuwhof, & S. B. Ebell

1986 Archaeological Investigations of the Junction of the Red and Assiniboine River, 1984. Parks Canada, Research Bulletin No. 241.

Quatemary Consultants Ltd.

1993 Archaeological Mitigation of the Johnston Terminal Refurbishment Project. Report on File with Marwest Management Canada Ltd. Historic Resources Branch and The Forks Renewal Corporation, winnihg.

n.d. Archaeological Monitoring of Site Services Installations for the Childrens Museum at The Forks. Dn Preparation]

Sussman, Lynne

1985 The Wheat Pattern; An Illustrated Survey. Environment Canada, Parks Canada, National History Parks and Sites Branch, Architecture and History, Studies in Archaeology.

Page 34: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

APPENDIX A

HERITAGE PERMITS

Page 35: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

The Heritage Resources Act (Subsection 14(2) and Sections 52 and 53)

Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Cilizenship

I

I Aeritage Permit No. A23-93 FORM 11

$&\ PURSUANT to SectionISthweM 53 of The Herltage Resources Act:

1 Name: Quaternary Consultants Ltd. 130 For t S t r e e t

Address:

I Winnipeg MB R3C 1C7

1 ATTENTION Mr Sid Kroker

I

I (hereinafter referred to as "the Permittee"), ' is hereby granted permission to:

ca r ry out the monitoring of s o i l t e s t augering a t n ine loca t ions between t h e Johnston ) Terminal, the B and B Building, and t h e Low-Line bridge a t t h e Forks (DlLg-33) i n Downtown Winnipeg;

during the period:

1 June 14, 1993

I This permit is issued subject to the following conditions:

( (1) That the information provided in the application for this permit dated the 9 th day of d 1923, is true in substance and in fact;

(2) That the Permittee shall compl with ail the provisions of The Heritage Resources Act and any regulations or orders

I thereunder; *LEXSE NOTE ~TTACHMENT RE CUSTODY AND OWNERSHIP OF HERITAGE OBJECTS I

(3) That the Permittee shall provide to the Minister a written report or reports with respect to the Permittee's activities pursuant to this permit, the form and content of which shall be satisfactory to the Minister and which shall be provid- ed on the following dates:

J u l y 30, 1993

1 (4) That this permit is not transferable; I

(5) This permit may be revoked by the Minister where, in the opinion of the ~ in is ter , there has been a breach of any of the terms or conditions herein or of any provision of The Heritage Resources Act or any regulations thereunder;

I

Page 36: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

Special Conditions:

All surface collections, excavations, etc. are to be carried out using the provenience system established for use at The Forks and this project will be designated 93A; All heritage objects (artifacts) recovered from The Forks are to be catalogued according to the CHIN system and the relevant Borden designation will be DlLg-33/93A; All heritage objects from The Forks are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature by March 31, 1994, for permanent curation and storage, unless appropriate loan requirements are arranged with the Curator of Archaeology prior to that date; A complete set of archaeological field records, catalogue sheets, laboratory analysis records, photographs, reports, etc. are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature upon completion of the archaeological research, or sooner if required; and any subsequent revisions or additions to these records are to be filed as soon as possible thereafter; All computer systems and programs employed in archaeological research should be compatible with the computer system established for The Forks; Appropriate arrangements and funds should be made available for the conservation of perishable heritage objects collected from The Forks; In the event that any human remeins are encountered during the excavations, all activity in that particular locus will cease immediately, and the Historic Resurces Branch notified immediately so that appropriate action can be determined and taken; The Permittee will be on-site supervising all aspects of the field work, including the removal of the railroad overburden during site preparation, at least 75% of the time, but when the Permittee must be absent, a qualified designate acceptable to Historic Resources Branch (copy of vita to be filed prior to commencement of field work) shall be present; The Permittee shall be responsible for the conduct of the laboratory analysis of recovered heritage objects and information to be included in the permit report; The report identified in 1\3 above shall conform at a minimum to "The Contents and Format of a Heritage Resource Impact Assessment" (copy attached) Neither the Government of Manitoba nor the party issuing this permit be liable for any damages resulting from any activities carried out pursuant to this permit, and the Permittee specifically agrees, in consideration for receiving this permit, to indemnify and hold harmless the Minister and the Government of Manitoba, the Minister and any employees and officials of the Government, against any and all action, liens, demands, loss, liability, cost, damage and expense including, without limitation, reasonable legal fees, which the Government, Minister or any employee or official of the Government may suffer or incur by reason of any of the activities pursuant to or related to this permit.

80h

I , Dated at the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba , this 9th day of June 1993.

I

I

Page 37: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I The Heritage Resources Act (Subsection 14(2) and Sections 52 and 53)

Manitoba Cullure. Heritage and Cllizenship

Aeritage Permit No. ~28-9.3

to Section/- 53 of The Herltage Resources Act:

FORM 11

1 Name: Quaternary Consultants Ltd. Address: 130 For t S t

1 Winnipeg MB R3C 1C7

ATTENTION Mr Sid Kroker

(hereinafter referred to as "the Permittee"),

is hereby granted permission to: ca r ry out an impact assessment of the proposed Plaza Area, between the Johnston Terminal, the B and B Building, and the Low-Line bridge a t The Forks (DlLg-33) i n Downtown Winnipeg t o determine the presence o r absence of he r i t age resources and t h e i r na tu re and extent if present ;

during the period:

July 6 t o 23, 1993

This permit is issued subject to the following conditions:

(1) That the information provided in the application for this permit dated the 18 t h June

day of 19 9 3 , is true in substance and in fact;

(2) That the Permittee shall comply with all the provisions of The Herltage Resources Act and any regulations or orders thereunder; PLEASE NOTE ATTACHMENT RE CUSTODY AND OWNERSHIP OF HERITAGE OBJECTS

(3) That the Permittee shall provide to the Minist,er a written report or reports with respect to the Permittee's activities pursuant to this permit, the form and content of which shall be satisfactory to the Minister and which shall be provid- ed on the following dates:

December 31, 1993

(4) That this permit is not transferable;

(5) This permit may be revoked by the Minister where, in the opinion of the Minister, there has been a breach of any of the terms or conditions herein or of any provision of The Herltage Resources Act or any regulations thereunder;

Page 38: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

Special Conditions:

All surface collections, excavations, etc. are to be carried out using the provenience system established for use at The Forks and this project will be designated 93B; All heritage objects (artifacts) recovered from The Forks are to be catalogued according to the CHIN system and the relevant Borden designation will be DlLg-33/93B; All heritage objects from The Forks are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature by March 31, 1994, for permanent curation and storage, unless appropriate loan requirements are arranged with the Curator of Archaeology prior to that date; A complete set of archaeological field records, catalogue sheets, laboratory analysis records, photographs, reports, etc. are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature upon completion of the archaeological research, or sooner if required; and any subsequent revisions or additions to these records are to be filed as soon as possible thereafter; All computer systems and programs employed in archaeological research should be compatible with the computer system established for The Forks; Appropriate arrangements and funds should be made available for the conservation of perishable heritage objects collected from The Forks; In the event that any human remains are encountered during the excavations, all activity in that particular locus will cease immediately, and the Historic Resurces Branch notified immediately so that appropriate action can be determined and taken; The Permittee will be on-site supervising all aspects of the field work, including the removal of the railroad overburden during site preparation, at least 75% of the time, but when the Permittee must be absent, a qualified designate acceptable to Historic Resources Branch (copy of vita to be filed prior to commencement of field work) shall be present; The Permittee shall be responsible for the conduct of the laboratory analysis of recovered heritage objects and information to be included in the permit report; The report identified in #3 above shall conform at a minimum to "The Contents and Format of a Heritage Resource Impact Assessment" (copy attached) Neither the Government of Manitoba nor the party issuing this permit be liable for any damages resulting from any activities carried out pursuant to this permit, and the Permittee specifically agrees, in consideration for receiving this permit, to indemnify and hold harmless the Minister and the Government of Manitoba, the Minister and any employees and officials of the Government, against any and all action, liens, demands, loss, liability, cost, damage and expense including, without limitation, reasonable legal fees, which the Government, Minister or any employee or official of the Government may suffer or incur by reason of any of the activities pursuant to or related to this permit.

Dated at the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba , this 23rd day of June 19-. 9 3 I

Page 39: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

1 The Heritage Resources Act (Subsection 14(2) and Sections 52 and 53)

Manlloba Culture. Heritage and Cltlzenshlp

, Heritage Permit No. ~ 3 3 - 9 3 I

PURSUANT to Section/&beseh 53 of The Heritage Resources Act:

I

1 Name: Quaternary Consultants Ltd ~ d d ~ ~ ~ ~ : 130 For t S t r e e t

1 Winnipeg MB R3C 1C7

I ATTENTION Mr Sid Kroker

I

--

FORM 11

(hereinafter referred to as "the Permittee"),

is hereby granted permission to:

ca r ry o u t t h e archaeological monitoring of components of The Forks Plaza (North T r a f f i c Loop) which a r e g r e a t e r than 0.9 m i n depth, s p e c i f i c a l l y one manhole a'djacent t o the Johnston Terminal a t the Forks (DlLg-33) i n Downtown Winnipeg i n order t o record s t r a t eg raph ic sequences and recover a rchaeologica l da t a from any pre-1888 horizons which may be encountered;

during the period:

August 4 t o September 15 , 1993

1 This permit is issued subject to the following conditions:

' (1) That the information provided in the application for this permit dated the i 26th day

of J u l v 19 93 , is true in substance and in fact;

(2) That the Permittee shall comply with all the provisions of The Heritage Resources Act and any regulations or orders

i thereunder;

(3) That the Permittee shall provide to the Minister a written report or reports with respect to the Permittee's activities

I pursuant to this permit, the form and content of which shall be satisfactory to the Minister and which shall be provid- i ed on the following dates:

March 31, 1994

, (4) That this permit is not transferable;

(5) This permit may be revoked by the Minister where, in the opinion of the Minister, there has been a breach of any of the terms or conditlons herein or of any provision of The Heritage Resources Act or any regulations thereunder;

Page 40: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

i (6) Special Conditions:

All surface collections, excavations, etc. are to be carried out using the provenience system established for use at The Forks and this project will be designated 93D; All heritage objects (artifacts) recovered from The Forks are to be catalogued according to the CHIN system and the relevant Borden designation will be DlLg-33/93D; All heritage objects from The Forks are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature by March 31, 1994, for permanent curation and storage, unless appropriate loan requirements are arranged with the Curator of Archaeology prior to that date; A complete set of archaeological field records, catalogue sheets, laboratory analysis records, photographs, reports, etc. are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature upon completion of the archaeological research, or sooner if required; and any subsequent revisions or additions to these records are to be filed as soon as possible thereafter; All computer systems and programs employed in archaeological research should be compatible with the computer system established for The Forks; Appropriate arrangements and funds should be made available for the conservation of perishable heritage objects collected from The Forks; In the event that any human remains are encountered during the excavations, all activity in that particular locus will cease immediately, and the Historic Resurces Branch notified immediately so that appropriate action can be determined and taken; The Permittee will be on-site supervising all aspects of the field work, including the removal of the railroad overburden during site preparation, at least 75% of the time, but when the Permittee must be absent, a qualified designate acceptable to Historic Resources Branch (copy of vita to be filed prior to commencement of field work) shall be present; The Permittee shall be responsible for the conduct of the laboratory analysis of recovered heritage objects and information to be included in the permit report; The report identified in U3 above shall conform at a minimum to "The Contents and Format of a Heritage Resource Impact Assessment" (copy attached) Neither the Government of Manitoba nor the party issuing this permit be liable for any damages resulting from any activities carried out pursuant to this permit, and the Permittee specifically agrees, in consideration for receiving this permit, to indemnify and hold harmless the Minister and the Government of Manitoba, the Minister and any employees and officials of the Government, against any and all action, liens, demands, loss, liability, cost, damage and expense including, without limitation, reasonable legal fees, which the Government, Minister or any employee or official of the Government may suffer or incur by reason of any of the activities pursuant to or related to this permit.

Dated at the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba , this 27th day of July 1933.

PTnkh b. ~inister of Culture, Heritage and Citizenship

Page 41: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I The Heritage Resources Act (Subsection 14(2) and Sections 52 and 53) I

Manitoba Culture. Heritage and Citlzenshlp

i Heritage Permit No. ~34-93 FORM 11

PURSUANT to SectionB&e&en 53 of The Heritage Resources Act:

1 Name: Quaternary Consultants Ltd 130 Fort St

I Address: Winnipeg MB R3C 1C7

ATTENTION Mr Sid Kroker

I (hereinafter referred to as "the Permittee"), I is hereby granted permission to:

I carry out an archaeological impact assessment and monitoring of the proposed land drainage, I

; water main, sanitary sewer and hydro connections as identified in the plan attached to the permit application for the Manitoba Children's Museum in the B and B Building at The Forks (DlLg-33) in Downtown Winnipeg to determine the presence or absence of heritage resources

( and their nature and extent if present;

I during the period:

I

August 3 to September 30, 1993

1 This permit is issued subject to the following conditions:

(1) That the information provided in the application for this permit dated the 27th day of Julv 1 9 Q , is true in substance and in fact;

(2) That the Permittee shall comply with all the provisions of The Heritage Resources Act and any regulations or orders I I thereunder; PLEASE NOTE ATTACHMENT RE CUSTODY AND OWNERSHIP OF HERITAGE OBJECTS

(3) That the Permittee shall provide to the Minister a written report or reports with respect to the Permittee's activities

I pursuant to this permit, the form and content of which shall be satisfactoly to the Minister and which shall be provid-

l ed on the following dates: March 31, 1994

1 (4) That this permit is not transferable;

(5) This permit may be revoked by the Minister where, in the opinion of the Minister, there has been a breach of any of the terms or conditions herein or of any provision of The Heritage Resources Act or any regulations thereunder;

Page 42: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

1 (6) Special Conditions:

All surface collections, excavations, etc. are to be carried out using the provenience system established for use at The Forks and this project will be designated 93E; All heritage objects (artifacts) recovered from The Forks are to be catalogued according to the CHIN system and the relevant Borden designation will be DlLg-33/93E; All heritage objects from The Forks are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature by March 31, 1994, for permanent curation and storage, unless appropriate loan requirements are arranged with the Curator of Archaeology prior to that date; A complete set of archaeological field records, catalogue sheets, laboratory analysis records, photographs, reports, etc. are to be deposited with the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature upon completion of the archaeological research, or sooner if required; and any subsequent revisions or additions to these records are to be filed as soon as possible thereafter; All computer systems and programs employed in archaeological research should be compatible with the computer system established for The Forks; Appropriate arrangements and funds should be made available for the conservation of perishable heritage objects collected from The Forks; In the event that any human remains are encountered during the excavations, all activity in that particular locus will cease immediately, and the Historic Resurces Branch notified immediately so that appropriate action can be determined and taken; The Permittee will be on-site supervising all aspects of the field work, including the removal of the railroad overburden during site preparation, at least 75% of the time, but when the Permittee must be absent, a qualified designate acceptable to Historic Resources Branch (copy of vita to be filed prior to commencement of field work) shall be present; The Permittee shall be responsible for the conduct of the laboratory analysis of recovered heritage objects and information to be included in the permit report; The report identified in (13 above shall conform at a minimum to "The Contents and Format of a Heritage Resource Impact Assessment" (copy attached) Neither the Government of Manitoba nor the party issuing this permit be liable for any damages resulting from any activities carried out pursuant to this permit, and the Permittee specifically agrees, in consideratior. for receiving this permit, to indemnify and hold harmless the Minister and the Government of Manitoba, the Minister and any employees and officials of the Government, against any and all action, liens, demands, loss, liability, cost, damage and expense including, without limitation, reasonable legal fees, which the Government, Minister or any employee or official of the Government may suffer or incur by reason of any of the activities pursuant to or related to this permit.

, Dated at the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba , this 27th day of July 19%.

& #'-.?L

~in is ter of Culture. Heritage and Citizenship

Page 43: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

APPENDIX B

CATALOGUE OF ARTIFACTS

Page 44: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

SPECIMEN CATALOGUE RECORD

Si te : DLLG-33:93B I h E FORKS Area: F?ED RIVER - C l i e n t : THE FDRKS RENEWAL CORP. Act. No-: -----.-.p.-.

Cat . P

I

2

3

4

5

6

7

Qtv O b j e c t Name I O b j e c t Type

1 SPIKE

1 SHERD BOiTLE

1 NRlL ROUND

3 SHERD BOWL?

1 SHERD CROCK

I SCRAP

1 VALVE UNIONIDHE

1 SHERD PLATE?ISAUCEK!

1 SHEKD PLATE

2 SHERD CUP

1 SHEKD PLATE

1 SHERD BUULUI iuv

I SHERD BOTTLE

1 SHERD fiOTTLE

! SHEKD BOTTLE

1 SHERD BOTTLE

2 SHERD JAR

1 SHERO BOUL

1 SCRAP

N a t e r l a i ~ I C u l t u r g ~. . roaxe--

I kUN INDUSTRIAL

IKON INOUSTKIAL

GLRSS INUUSIKIAL

B R K t L i i t iHULi5 ln ikL

S T t t L I ~ U U S I K ~ ~ L

IRON INUUSIK~HL

POKCELRIN IEIuUSI~IHL

STUNEWAKt INDUSTRIRL

T I N INDUSTRIAL

GLRSS INDUSIKiHL

SHELL INDUSIK IA i

PUKCLiAlN INUUbl l t iAL

POkCELAIN IND I IS IK~HL

PUKCELHIN INUUSTKlHL

POHLELHIN I hUVa lK lAL

YURC~LAIN I N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l A L

kLASS l N 0 U S i i : l H ~

6LHS5 INU&IK!~L

SLRSS lNu!$lXiRL

6LASS lNUbSiK iHL

GLASS INDUSTKIHL

PORCELAIN lNDUSTRlkL

T I N 1 N d u S l K i A ~

IkUN I N U U S ~ % ~ H L

IRON INUUSTHIHL

L o c a t ~ o n I U n i t C o l l . Ddte- . -- . - - - --

PLAlR 19930707 NOZTH IRENCH PLHZA !Y?30707 NOKIH TRtNCH

P i h l h 19930707 N U K ~ H M N C H

r ~ H l r i iY?307(11 N M i n I < k k C H

I'LRZA 19930707 ElORTH 1StNCH

PLAZA 19930707 N u d i n TKcNLH

PLRlR 19930707 NORTH i8thC.H

PLAZA 19530707 H O Y i l l TKEkCH

r L R l H 19Y30707 NOI IH TRENCH

FLRZA 19930707 NOnih IfttNCH

PLAZA 1943(1707 h 0 8 i ~ TRENCH

Page 45: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

H3N381 H18ON WlUlA

H3bl3H1 HlHON UZUld

H3N3HI HIWON V l V l d

H3N3WJ Hldf lN H1Hl.l

H3N311 UlHflN n1-l.+

~ 3 ~ 3 ~ 1 ' UlWnN VlV1.l

U 3 N W UlWnW H 7 H l . j

H3N3Y! U!IOLJ t'lY1.l

HON3HI H I ION H l V l d

83N3YI H l lOR H l t n d

H3N38!. H l l O N H l W l d

H3N311 HlWON H l W l i

U3N381 HlWOIl U l m d

1 Y I I l S n I l N i SSV19

1VIHISf lONI ssms

1VIWISflONI SSU19

1UlHlSnONl SSH19

l U I 8 I S i l f l N I s sn19

1WIWISIIIINI NOXI

?HI4 lSf l f lN I ssms

1 n r n l s n f l N i SSVl9

3NVdMOONIM 8 PC

3NIH3UW 310NUH I EE

311109 OU3HS I ZE

311108 083HS 1 I E

31110R 0W3HS I OE

YIlVMUWU 3N08 9NOl I 6Z

UI1VWWUW 031~11N301Nf l I BZ

3VO 180d31 3N08 9N01 I l Z

~ ~ 8 3 s sns 31UNIUONNI 1 9Z

Page 46: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

'8IWISflflNI ssmo

lH'Y!SflOu! C$H1?

lHI8lS~lflNI H I O n l !!ma

lHlillS(lIJNT 3N08

lHIY1SflflMI 3'408

1HIHISflIJHI NDa 1

1tllHISflONI NOHI

1WIaISnaNI NIH133HOd

lHI8ISflflNI Y lm??nOd

lvT%ISnaNI Nlfl33HOd

1HINISnONI ssms

1HIYISflONI ssms

1YIHISflONI SSHlCl

1tlirlSnflNI SSHl9

1HlWLSllflNI $SHlQ

lHl)I!SflflNI q s m ?

1Wl~lSflPNI !NOR

1wIWlSflaNI HI001 k3r108

ltll8lSflONI NO81

IWIllSflONI NOW I

ltllWlSflfl41 NO81

311108 fl83HS I SL

8OlUlflSNI I b l

WXOAIN8W3 c1001 ! H ~ ~ I Y B W 1 FL

HlArnnno r lnv 3803 NHOH 1 Zl

HSI4 fl31jIlN301Nfl b 11

IH373 3d08 I O L

ONll08 I N Z 69

i l H O f l 0 8 3 ~ s 9 89

idfl3 /ilflO8 083HS I 19 i i n o ~ O83H.S 1 99

311108 083HS 1 59

311108 aH3HS I b9

311108 flH3HS 1 C9

311108 083115 1 19

31Wld 3NHdnOONIM S 19

3NHdfiOONIM C 09

HSI j 3ldWWS I 6s

SIA0 HI001 ! t l l l IXt l~ I 8 s

d m 1 I LS (131jIlN301N1l

1 I 9s

1IWN 1 SS

mA13WOOIl8W INVlWHd I bS

tlntlwwtlu 818 I CS

i l l lo8 083HS I I S

ilMO8 n83HS I IS

a d 4 l l 2 T i V p ~ w q o h l o r . v 3

Page 47: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

-- -- -r, -r, -r, - m -m -r, -- -rr -= -= -yl -v l -- -9 -7. --c -TI -r. -n -r;. -r -r -e. I =a ZXI ZT ZT Z T =,-- Z 7 Z r ZD Z O 2 C Z C Z I ZX. ST iLu Z O z r Z O Z O i C r 511 2 r T 7 iz ri -0 00 oD e r g ED -3, CID o n C Z C Z s z r?z OW, D r r D O u= EX DZ -I. CIT O X or o l == o n I- C Z C Z Crn cu, c r o C m crr, cu; cni =" C ~ r n =", c r c r c z cv, C C CC, Cu, C-0 CC, C V : C c r ? cu; c w

D u;w r n row u ; u; v. wr cxr mrr rorr rnm -,- mm mu. m v w m u,w I I i - 4 4 . . . , 4 . - , - 4 - -. - -4 r r 4- - r 1 1 - d 3 3

-4 x - E T Z T 'D T 'D T n E X T X T X " E T E R C Z $ -2 1 1 1 C I D D L - D D D Y E . ~ ~ L D D ~ D . D Z P Z + ~ ~ D Z ~ ~ D D !. 1 , : 1 C! r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 11 r - - 7 r 7 r -

Page 48: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

H3N381 HIWOU V l H l d

H3N3W1 HIWON H l H l i

H3N381 HlHON WZHld

H?N3WI HlHON 8 1 H l d

H333H1 HlHON H l U d

H3N?N! HIHON n x i d

H3R381 HIWON n7mA

H3N341 HIWON WlH ld

h : ]N3 ' H130*I V!8ld

H3N?W! HIdON U l n l ?

H?ri381 H I #ON U l U d

lUlH!.SflUNI VIlUUUWU 3N08 818 I SZ 1

1WIWlSnaNI 311108 SSP19 083HS 1 P Z I

~ ~ I H I S ~ O N I 311108 SSHln 083HS I EZ1

IWlHlSf lONI 311108 S S H 9 083HS F 221

i v ~ n l s n a ~ ~ 311108 SSUlq 0W3HS I I Z I

av3IS3WOH NIl l lHW 3 d l d 1 0 1 1

flH31S!UOH 311108 SSHlQ n83HS 1 611

flH31S3UflH (lH3H-1 NOYI 1lWN I 8 1 1

I l H ~ I S i W f l H 53AV =NO8 n l f l d ~ 3 ~ I 1 1 1

I1W!$S!OOH WIlQWWQU ?NO8 031311N3aINQ F 91 1

OH31S3WOH WI~UUUUU 3HO8 818 I ST1

aW31S3UOH QIlVUYWY 3 ~ 0 8 i inns I ~ I I

UW31S3UOH H ~ A I ~ W O O ~ ~ W Q 3NO8 3800 NHOH 1 E l I

flt'31S3UOH UA13H i lO l lHV 3NO8 Sll83UflH I Z I I

aV31S3YOH VlAI3t'!IOIlWV 3Nna 'd8831H3A I 111

1VIHlSf lONI 311108 SS1(19 OMHS 1 011

1UIWISf laNI YVT S S H ~ S 083HS 1 6 0 1

1WIHlSlIr lNl i l N 0 8 NlH173HOd 0H3HS I 8 0 1

'HIHISflaNI 1MOR NIVl33HO.I 083HS I LO1

lVlHlSl !ONI i H 3 3 f l H S l i 3 1 V l d llIt113?NO.I OH3HS I 9 0 I

lWIWIS(ION1 i d l l 3 lilfiO8 Nlt l l33WOd OH3HS I SO1

1WIHISCONI NOH1 d V 8 l S Z b 0 1

lV I81Sf lONI ~ 1 1 1 3 ~ a 0 1 1 1 ~ 3NOR UlfldU3S I F01

~WIWIS~ONI W~AIOV!IOIIWV ?NO8 818 I ' 201

lW I8 lS f lON I QlA13WOOIIWV 3NOR Snd8113 1 I 0 1

-- aseqd 1e ln l 1n3 I [ e ~ ~ a ~ e y a d n l l ) a y q a I a l e ~ I I ~ F ~ O A T ~ I ' l e g

Page 49: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

H3N3?! hI3ON WZVld

H3N311!. HIWON VlWi;

H3N3F1 UlUnN H7UlA

H 3 N Y I H I WON k!Hl,j

H?N!WI UIXON h!Vlrl

P3N3W! HlWCN U7H ld

H3N381 HIYON e 7 u i d

H3N3W1 HlaON H7tcld

H3N3Y1 HIYON VZIJld

H3N3WI HIWON 81Y1d

H3N381 HlYflW HIH?d

H3N3nl HIYON V l V l d

H3N311 H l lON tll?ld

H3N3Xl HlWON V l U l d

H3N3dl HIWON V l W l d

H3N311 Hl8ON V l U l d

H:?N%l HlWflN n 7 n w

H3N3al HIYON H7V ld

H3N3HI HlWON H I H l d

1YIUJSnaNI s s v s

1VlWISflONI SGWll

111181SflQNI ssw19

1HI)IISflONI Y3HIU31

~ H I Y l S f l Q N I NOW 1

l V I 8 I S f l f l N I ssw19

l V I 8 I S f l O N I 3NO8

311108 I

O83HS P 051

311108 Q83HS 1 6 b l

3111118 OY3HS I B P I

I 3YVfl65

1 lVN 1 L b l

?NIWNIH3 1 b k l

LIwr OY3HS 1 E b l

df l3 OW3HS I Z b l 1

Q 3 1 j I l N 3 Q l N f l O83HS Z I b l

SN3353h l f l j 83SN3d13V 311135 I Ot I

U I I Y U U U Q 3 1 ~ I I N 3 O I N f l Z 6 E I

VllWWUtlW O31 j I lN301N f l b BE1 I

WIlUWWUU ?NO8 9NOl 1 L E I I

WlA10UO011WU I

Yf lU3 j I 9 E I

3WUflBS l l W N I SCI I

i l n o q fl83HS b b E l

3 1 U l d 3NVdtlOONlti 1 E E I !

Page 50: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

1VlHlSf lONI SSHlR

ltJIWIS(ION1 S S t n l

1tJIWISflONI SSHls

1YIHISI l I IN I SSWl l

1WI l lS f lON I SSWl9

1Wl l lS i lON I ssms

OW31 S3UOH 3NR8

UV31S3WOH 3N08

flu31 S3UOH 3N08

flW31S3UOH ?NO4

flV?IS3WOH ?NO8

0V31S3UOH

lV lU1S f l l lN I ssms

i d n 3 l i l t 4 0 8 083HS 1 S L I

df l3 583HS I PL I

311108 583HS 1 E L I

311108 483HS I 1 1 1

311100 083HS I 111

311108 O83HS 1 O L I

.. ~ ~.. . . : - 0 1 \ 1 ' 3 3 - 'd803 lWM3N38 S N w A 3Hl :quay 1 3

~ ~

N ~ A . I g'qw : ea lye S:WCI.-I 3~ I BEE. :E&-Wla :a%rs

Page 51: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

t r lN3F I 15% H l U d

H3N381 I S M U l b l d

H O N W 153f l U7U1d

H3N381 IS3 f l bZWld

~ 3 ~ 3 x 1 I s q n t l lV1d

HON381 1S3fl YZV ld

H3N381 153I i U l U l d

KIN381 HI8ON UZUld

H3N3WI H l l O N b l t l l d

H3N3W! H I ION VZUld

H3N38I. HlHnN W l ' J l A

H3N3WI H J M N V!Hld

H3N3A1 HI8ON UTUld

H3N381 HIWON HZUld

H3N3I1 H I ION VZUld

H3N381 H I ION U l t n d

H3N3d1 HI80N WlU ld

H3N3al H I lON U l U l d

H3N3WI Hl8ON U l U l d

H3N381 H I ION U l U l d

H3N381 HlHON H l u l d

H3N311 H I ION b l U l d

H3Y311 HlXON U l U l d

HON381 H I ION b7HlA

H3N3dl U l N l N U l U l d

dU83S 1 OOZ

3 X f l l X I 3 Y008HIWU I 6 6 1 8UC

083HS C 8 6 1

031 j11N30INf l 0 I3HS E 1 6 1

l H 0 8 a m I 961

l33flWS 0H3HS I 5 6 1

311108 0H3HS I P61

O 3 I j I I N 3 O I N f l 1 1 E6 1

V l d 1 3 U ~ 0 1 1 8 U UlfldU3S I Z h l

U lA13UOOI l lU i S f l S l U l l i S f l d 8 U 3 1 1 161

WIlUWUWU ?NO8 9N01 Z 061

WIlU~WWY 3NOU 9NOl I 6 8 1

UIlUUUUU 818 I 881

WlA13UOOIl8U 8 1 8 I 1 8 1

U lA l3U I IO l lYU U883183h I 9 8 1

UlA13U0OIlHW XNWlUHd I SO1

I N 0 8 083HS P POI

W33flUS 083HS C C81

i d f l 3 f i l M 0 U U83HS Z ZBT

3111 8313s I I 8 1

031 j I lN301N f l 1lWN I 0 8 1

3 d I d I 6 1 1

dU83S I E L I 1noa

0M3HS I LL1

i 8 3 3 i l U S l i 3 1 W l d 083HS I 9 L I

Page 52: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

1 SPECIMEN CATALOGUE RECORD

1 I S i t e : DLLG-33:93B THE FORKS A r e a : RED^^^

C l i e n t : THE FORKS RENEWAL COUP. A== - No.:

I Cat. t Qtv Object Name 1 Object Type H a t e r i a l I C u l t u r a L Q ~ e ~ - . _ . - - L o c a t i o n 1 U n i t C o l l . Date

I 20 1 2 GAUGE GLASS PLAlA 19930708 i INDUSTRIAL WEST TRENCH

202 1 SHERD GLASS PLAlA BOTTLE

19930706

I INDUSTRIAL NEST TRENCH

203 1 SHERD GLASS PLAlA 19930708 BOTTLE INDUSTRIAL WEST TRENCH

204 I SHERD GLASS PLAlA 19930708 BOTTLE ! INDUSTRIAL WEST TRENCH

205 12 HINDOUPAHE GLASS PLA~A 1Y93u708 INDUSTRIAL dES1 TRENCH

206 I SHERD GLASS PLAIA BOWL

19930708 INDUSTRIAL WEST TRENCH I 207 I WINDOUPANE GLASS PLAlA IY93070tl INDUSTRIAL WEST TRENCH

208 I SCRAP COPPER / PLAlA 19930708 i INDUSTRIAL ' HEST TRENCH

209 4 NAIL IRON PLAlA 19930708 SQUARE INDUSTRIAL WEST TKtHCH

1 210 1 VERTEBRA BONE PLAZA ARTIODACTYLA

19930708 INDUSTRIAL UEST TRENCH

211 1 KNIFE IRON PLAlA

I 19930708

INDUSTRIAL NEST IRENCH 212 1 SHERD GLASS PLAZA

BOTTLE 1'3930708

INDUSTRIAL WEST TRENCH 213 I ULNA BONE PLAlA

ARTIODACTYLA 19930708

i i

HOtlESIEAD WEST TRENCH '

214 1 RIB BONE PLAZA ARTIODACTYLA

19930708 HOUESTEAD MEST TRENCH

I

i 215 I COSTAL CARTILAGE BONE PLAIA HAHMALIA

19430706 HOIESTEAD UEST TRENCH

216 1 VERTEBRA BONE r i ~ l a 19930708

1 ARTIOOACTYLA HDHESTEAD WtST TRENCH

217 I LONG BONE DUNE ~ L A Z A RAHHRLIA

13930708 HOttESTEAh WtST TRENCH

218 ' 11 RIB 1 BDht PLRlH NAHMALIA

19930708 HOMESTEAD UtST TREhCH

219 I SHERO GLASS PLAIA BOTTLE

19930708 INDUSlKlAL WLST TKENCH

I 220 2 SHERD GLASS PLAZA JAR

19930108 INDUSTRIAL UEST TRENCH

I 221 4 SHERD PORCELAIN

CUP INDUSTRIAL

I 222 2 SHERD PORCELAIN PLATE?ISAUCEK? INDUSTRIAL

223 1 NAIL UNlDENTlF IED

224 I BUTTON SHANK

225 3 WINDOWPANE

COPPER INDUSTRIAL

GLASS IhUIISTRIAL

PLRIA 19930708 UEST TKENCH

PLAZH 1YY30708 UgST TRENCH

PLAIA 19930708 WEST TRENCH PLAlA 1Y930708 HEST TRENCH

PLAZH 19930708 WEST TRENCH

Page 53: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I .

: Y I ; --a

H: j i s i I I I I I I I I I T I I I I = I I I I I I I I 1 l ., U U U U U U U ~ . ~ U U U Y U U U U U U U ~ _ l U _ l _ l _ l U U

x Z L Z Z Z I T L Z Z Z Z Z Z z = L Z Z = * * Z r z W ~ ~ W W W W W W ~ . " W 4 u W W W W W W W u W W W W W W . = = LT LT x - rn c - + - . - . , - - - c

Z Z E E E E E L T = = = = = m U : U : - U I - c C e C . . - r r C C C C

nl .. " I+ z- zc zc zt zt 5- 5- 5- 3- zc 5- zc 3- 3- 2- zt z- ZC 2- z- z- ::* zt 3- a m c m . i ~ m u m u~n a m a m =in ain n:ul a r n u r n a r n ain ain a m a m a r n a m a m a m e r n a m ~ r n

yi 6 31 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% $2 2% ,?% 2% dg 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2 s 2% 2% 2% ?s 2% <g .. z i

JJ ; x j ! zl -

W i 31 3 m

i ' 0 1 i ? I a 2 a a 2 2 5 z C 1 : 2 =a 2 =a 2 =a 2 ZcI. 2 =a 3 za 2 P u a El cI , u u wn: - , A 2 2

i

- -- - a a a a a r a a a a - z a: a: OU: UI = .(r= a= - 8 2 a= a ~ : .ax aU: w w w w w w w w w w ,Y cxm U: m = Uc t C 2 t 2 2 2 2 2 C t C e c c c c t c + C c ,-- c a m d m m turn w m w m w m wio w m w m - m d m m m in ol rn in in ~1 m w i n iom mrn iom s= 42 y$s g= g = g = g s g = g s 2s &g =g gg gg g g g s g g gg g g g s gg 32 2 s g;i:

0 3 d, 1 W Z *= O Z O Z O Z 02 O Z O Z o= OZ a 0 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o= 00 c r 2= 2Z 2I ,--- rn- m- CL- L- L- CL- CL- CL- CL- X X m * -1 m r m= m z -= -1 m= m r m 1 rn- .m- ,m- w-

z W E

m 8 Y (A

C) W a

Page 54: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

.. I I t . (U u !

I L U

W x

- 4 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 A A A a a L 2 A - - 2 2 5 g Z + r & E g 2 2 g 2 2 z z z = z 2

2 2 = a = a = a = - 4- 2- A+ = " w - r a - CC + C r C A C A C C

22 52 $2 gg gz $2 gs g2 g2 gs gs zg %% e2 Z% -2 ",s ,% ,% ,z " Z ::y Zg, g2 nr AS 2Z d_IZ _IT 2I 2Z

un iyr iyn =r r 9 T- Z = ZP ~r rr WP ro u r u- u- ,co- m- m- m- u- u- u- u- o- SZ Ef EZ F2 g-Z S'L gZ Z2 Z1. ZB Z? z3 E5 ,$Z

z W

r U W a m

m I D -I

W

m m : 2 412

w r L

C1

; E * 42 'A

; 4-

ul

3 ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ^ m o - . 3 - " " " - - O % % $ % z x z z f E

; : nr

r

:

N E ~ E E E ~ E E % % % , N N N N N , N N N N N N

0. r.. r = % Y w r a

+- 0 Y w A

x = = 1 w a - * - a u r L L r L +- C

Y) ul aa Y

. . z ::3 z 5 s C. -2 Ed aY 3 = To A O 2 ~2 z,. gz s; 2; E2 ss & zz s -u PE P W =a =c 2'" Y w a- u ow -2

d . . z g g g g g g g g g g 2% 3 ES g:

y N " , - N m N - - - - Z N N m " , - - - - N - C . , - - -

0

ul VI- VI- -9 in- m- VI- vlm V I ~ cnm vlm vl- VI- -a. VIE ma. -r: VIE LVI OLL ZLL aa -E $ 2% S=

Page 55: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

1 SPECIMEN ChTALOGUL HECORU

I S i t e : DLLG-33: '33B-_TL1_E F O R K S ._ .. Area: KED P IVE&.__~ C l i e n t : THE FORKS RENEWAL COHP. P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P .. A c c . No.: ~~ ~~ ~

1 Cat. II Q t v Object N a ~ e I Object lype

276 i SHERO 1 BOTTLE

277 5 SHERD BOTTLE

I 278 3 YINOO!4F'ANE

279 I WINDOWPANE

I PLATE

I 280 1 MINDOMPANE PLATE

281 3 WINDOWPANE

I 282 I NAIL SOU ARE

I 283 3 SHERD

BOTTLE

284 I SHERD BDUL

1 285 I SHERD UNIDENTIFIED

286 1 INNOMINATE

I flAfiflALIA

I 287 I FEMUR HAHMALIA

288 2 YINDDWPANE

i 289 1 $HERD BDTTLE

I 290 1 SHEKD

I BDTTLE 291 2 WINDOWPANE

I 292 3 SHERD BOTTLE

293 1 SHERD

I BOTTLE

I 294 1 SHERD BOTTLE

I 295 1 GAUGE

296 I O-RING

I 297 I NAIL UNIDENTIFIED

298 I SHERD BOTTLE

i 299 I SHERU PLATE

300 2 SHERD

1 PLATE?ISAUCER.!

4 1

R a t e r l a 1 I C u l t u r a l Phase - . - .- . . .. . . - . - .. -. - - . -.

bLASS INUUSTKIAL

GLR'JJ IR~USTKIRL GL ASS INUU5TKIAL

GLASS IfiDUSTRIAL

GLASS INDUSTRIAL

GLASS IhlDUSTKlAL

IRON INDUSTRIAL

GLHSS INDUSTRlPL

PORCELAIN INDUSTKIRL

PORCELAIN INDUSTKlrlL

BONE INDUSTRIAL UONE INDUSTRIAL

GLASS INUUSIRI AL GLRSS INUUSlKl AL bLRSS I~JIUSTIIIHL

GLRSS INDUSTKIAL

GLASS INDUSTRIAL

6LASS IliDUSTKlAL

GLASS INDUSTRIAL

GLASS INDUSTRIAL

PLASTIC INDUSTKI AL IRON INDUSTKIAL

GLASS INDUSTRIAL

PORCELAIN INDUSTRIAL POeCELAIN INDUSTI(1HL

~ o c a t l a n ~.~ I u n i i --.-

rLRlH dE5 i TRENCH F'LAZk WtST IRElvCIf

PLHZR WEST TRENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

rLAZA MEST TRENCH

YLAZA LlEST TRENCH

YLAZA UEST TRENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

PLAZA UEST TRENCH

PLAZA NEST TRENCH

PLAZR 'dEST IRENCH

PLAiA WtST TKENCH

'?LAiR HEST TRENCh

F'LRZA UtST TKENCH

PLAZR WEST TKtNCH

PLAZA UEST TRENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

PLAZA UEST TRENCH

PLAZA MEST TRENCH

PLAZR WEST TKENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

PLAZA UEST TRENCH

PLAZA WESl TkENCH

PLAZA UEST TRtNCH

C o i l . Uate -- - - - - - . -

IYY30709

l:j.330;09

13uju7i19

1~jy:i~:17ay

1930709

1Yj30709

19930709

19930709

191130709

199307011

19930709

I9930709

lYY30709

IY'33410Y

I Y j j o 7 0 9

1993,)1(1',

19930709

IY93070Y

1Y93070Y

19930709

1993U709

19930709

19930709

19330709

1993070'3

Page 56: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

I SPEC1 MEN CATALUOUE KECOHD

I S i t e : DLLG-33: 9313 'THE FORKS ~ ~ Area : K-~UAIJE!! . ..

C l i e n t : THE FORKS RENEWAL COUP. f i c c - No- :

I C a t . % Q t v O b j e c t Name 1 O b j e c t T v v e N a t e r i a l 1 C u l t u r a l P h a s e L o c a t i o n I U n i t C o l l . D a t e

I 3 0 1 I R I B HAHHALIA

3 0 2 1 LONE BONE MAnnPLlA

i 3 0 3 1 LONG BONE HAHUALIA

3 0 4 2 UNIDENTlF lED

I n a n n e L l A

3 0 5 I N A I L UNIDENTIFIED

I 3 0 6 2 SHERD

PLATE

3 0 7 4 INSULATOR

I 3 0 8 2 WINDOYPANE PLATE

1 3 1 0 3 SHERD JAR

3 1 1 I SHERD i JU6 1 3 1 2 2 SHERD

CROCK

3 1 3 I SHERO SRUCER I 3 1 1 3 SHERD BOTTLE

I 3 1 5 3 SHERD BDTTLk

3 1 6 I SHERD

i BOTTLE

3 1 7 I BOTTLE BOTTLE

3 1 8 1 SHERD

I BOTTLE

3 1 9 2 SHERD BOTTLE

3 2 0 I SHERD BOTTLE I 3 2 1 I SHERD BOTTLE

3 2 2 1 SHERD BOTTLE

3 2 3 1 SHERD i BOTTLE

I 3 2 4 4 SHERD BDTTLE

3 2 5 2 SHERD

I BOTTLE

BONE INDUSTRlRL

BONE INUUSTRIRL

BONE HOnESTERD

BONE HOMESTEAD

IRON HOhESTEAU

POKCtLA lN HONESTEAD

GLASS INDUSTRIAL

GLASS I N D U S ~ R I A L

GLASS INDUSTRIAL

GLASS INUUSTKIAL

STUNENARE INDUSTRIAL

STONEUARE INDUSTRIRL

PORCELAIN INDUSTKIRL GLASS INDUSTRlAL

GLASb INOUSIKIHL

GLASS INUUSTn lnL

GLRSS I N D b S i r l H L

GLASS INOusTKlk!L

G L R ~ S INOUSIKIR,.

6LH55 1NUUSTKl AL

ELASS INDUSIRIAL

E L ASS I N D U S I K l A L GLhSS INDUSTRIAL GLASS INDUSTKI AL GLASS INDUSTRIAL

PLAZA MEST TREhCH

PLAZA NEST IKLNCH

P L h i A UEST TKENCH

PLAZA NEST TRENCH

YLAZA NrST TREllCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

P t A i A dEST TRENCH

Y i A i A UEST 'IKENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH P L A I A HEST IRENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

PLAZA NEST TREIiCH

PLAZA UEST TRENCH PLRZA MEST TREhCH

PLAZA Wk5T FRENCH

PLAZA w ts i IYLNCH

rL i l l f i WEST IR tNCH

rLm kEST Ti?EkCH

P L A i H U E b i i R t N C H

PLALH UEST TRtNCH

PLAZA kEST IRENCH

PLAZA WEST TRENCH

F L A i A HEST TRLNCH PLALA YEST IKENCH PLAZA WEST TRENCH

Page 57: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program

1 V l E l S f l O N ~ 3NO4

1 Y I Y !SflONI 3P?Q

1VIHISflONI 3#0R

lV!WlSflONI NlVl33WOd

lVII11SflONI S S U S

lV!BISflONI SSVl9

l V I 8 I S f l f l N I ssv1s

1VlHISflONI NOH!

311108 O83HS Z LEC

VllVUUWU 031411N301Nfl 8 SCE

SfldillV131 3NIdS lVSU0U I ZEC

S g H V d 1 3 1 8Vlil9NV -A8VlN30 I ICE

031111N30IN1I 0U3HS I OCE

311108 OW3HS Z 6ZE

311108 083HS 1 8ZE

311108 0H3HS I LZC

Page 58: ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING IMPACT ASSESSMENT …€¦ · An archaeological resource management program was undertaken as part of the development of The Forks Heritage Plaza. The program