architecture planning interior design

34
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN Residence Life & Dining Services Master Plan Bowling Green State University February 24, 2009

Upload: elita

Post on 23-Jan-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Residence Life & Dining Services Master Plan Bowling Green State University February 24, 2009. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN. Dining Issues. State of the Facilities Facility Assessment Summary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

ARCHITECTUREPLANNINGINTERIOR

DESIGN

Residence Life & Dining Services Master Plan Bowling Green State University

February 24, 2009

Page 2: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

State of the Facilities

• Facility Assessment Summary• McDonald Dining Hall (all foodservice

areas) should be completely renovated as soon as possible. Infrastructure is at the point of total failure.

• Kreischer has some physical plant issues; does not need immediate renovation.

• Founders is overall in good shape & does not need immediate renovation.

• Commons has physical plant issues; BGSUbs area should be updated to make it more attractive/does not need immediate renovation.

• BTSU: Poor circulation in servery/some back-of-the-house issues.

• Temptations & Kravings could be improved with more circulation space but neither need immediate attention.

Page 3: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

State of the Facilities

• McDonald Dining Hall• Short Term (0-5 years)

• If possible, tear down non-load bearing walls & redesign servery to facilitate traffic flow & queuing.

• Replace ceiling & light fixtures as necessary and/or to improve ambient lighting/food presentation.

• Long Term (5-10 years)• Gut rehab all dining spaces (kitchen,

dining room, servery, restaurant) to update & to improve efficiencies & ambiance.

• Relocate the receiving dock if possible to minimize interaction with pedestrians.

Page 4: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

State of the Facilities

• Kreischer• Short Term:

• Add back filled coolers in the food court area.

• Provide a better interface with central control to manage the ambient. temperature of the various spaces.

• Long Term:• To be determined as a result of

the direction BGSU elects to proceed with the dining program options presented on February 24 & 25, 2009.

Page 5: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

State of the Facilities

• Founders• Short Term: Minor changes/updates to the

servery.• Long Term:

• To be determined as a result of the direction BGSU elects to proceed with the dining program options presented on February 24 & 25, 2009.

• Commons Marketplace & BGSUbs• Short Term:

• Upgrade interface with central HVAC system for better control of ambient temperature.

• Enlarge BGSUbs & replace stainless steel mobile carts with millwork counters. Upgrade lighting.

• Replace the original counter at Salads By Design with a more attractive millwork counter made with a solid surface material.

• Long Term:• To be determined as a result of the direction

BGSU elects to proceed with the dining program options presented on February 24 & 25, 2009.

Page 6: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Summary of Market Research

• Methods:• Focus Groups & Personal

Interviews• Web-based Survey

• Approximately 1,200 total respondents

• Distributed to 6,899 students & 2,635 faculty/staff

• Note: The following survey results were tabulated before second invitation was issued in order to meet project deadlines. All survey information will be updated in project final report.

Page 7: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Please rate the importance of the following factors when you decide where to eat on campus.

Page 8: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Summary of Market Research

• Meal Plans• Static meal plan participation• Dissatisfaction with elimination of

Rollover• Requests for more Flex Funds for use

in the BTSU.• Leftover meal plan money=runs on c-

stores (low margin venues).• Survey results showed fairly

significant dissatisfaction with current meal plans.

• Survey results showed that student respondents are open to alternative meal plan options.

Page 9: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

The current selection of meal plans offers flexibility & meets my lifestyle needs.

• 65.6% of on-campus freshmen & 44.2% of on-campus sophomore respondents agreed or strongly agreed.

Page 10: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

I feel that the current BGSU meal plans are a good value.

• 37.7% of on-campus freshmen & 57.2% of on-campus sophomore respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed.

Page 11: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

The current dining hours allow me to use my meal plan money when I want to.

• 49.5% of on-campus freshmen & 57.9% of on-campus sophomore respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed.

Page 12: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

I don’t believe the current meal plans are a good value because I have too much leftover money at the end of the

semester.

• 39.3% of on-campus freshmen & 33.8% of on-campus sophomore respondents agreed or strongly agreed.

Page 13: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Summary of Market Research

• Hours of Operation• Hours not aligned with students’

lifestyles/class schedules.• Limited hours on weekends & in

c-stores=dissatisfaction & less opportunity to use meal plan money.

• 67.9% of on-campus freshmen respondents said that the #2 reason they call for delivery (after convenience) is because the on-campus dining venues are closed.

• 71.4% of on-campus freshmen & 72.0% of on-campus sophomore respondents said that the #1 reason they eat off campus is because the on-campus dining venues are closed.

Page 14: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Summary of Market Research

• Price/Value• Dining on campus is perceived as

“expensive.”• Survey respondents rated good value

(price, portion, quality) & menu prices as very important factors when they decide to eat on campus.

• 41.4% of overall survey respondents said the #1 reason they eat off campus is because of menu prices.

• 25.3% of overall survey respondents said that the #1 reason they call for food delivery is because of price.

Page 15: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Summary of Market Research

• Menu Variety & Selection/Food Quality & Freshness• Minimum display cooking/made-to-order

options.• Somewhat limited ethnic variety.• Many customers complained about “the

same variety” or “limited variety.”• Survey respondents rated menu variety &

selection and food quality & freshness as very important factors when they decide to eat on campus.

• 50.9% of overall survey respondents said that the #1 reason they eat off campus is because of menu variety & selection; 34.2% said food quality & freshness.

• 28.4% of overall survey respondents said that the #1 reason they call for food delivery is because of menu variety and selection. 24.5% said food quality & freshness.

Page 16: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Summary of Market Research

• UDS Catering• Perceived as expensive, especially

compared with off-campus options.• Service in Stadium Club & suites is

satisfactory to clients.• Catering food production:

• 2nd floor kitchen is extremely tight• Minimal staging area• Issues with food production forecasting• Storage issues

• Customers want one-stop shopping, online menus & ordering/confirmation.

• Many customers noted UDS’s professionalism.

Page 17: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Future Direction for Dining Services

• Considerations:• A La Carte (Status Quo) vs. Anytime

Dining• What is the Value Proposition? • How does the market research influence

the future direction?

Page 18: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Collaboration

Value Proposition

Consumption DrivenPromotes more food

consumption/waste/ unnecessary spending & less gross profitability

• A La Carte: Declining Balance

• All you care to eat:

Block meals/Meals per week/

Meals per day

• Finite # of meals/dollars

• Voluntary meal plan participation decreases

Access Driven Promotes less food consumption/waste

& higher gross profitability

• Anytime Dining

• Unlimited access

• Students consume less

food: Reduce food waste

• Infinite # of meals/access to food

• Voluntary meal plan participation increases

Page 19: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

I Would Prefer A Meal Plan That Permits Unlimited Access To Anytime Dining In The Sundial, Founders Food Court, McDonald Dining Hall and The Commons

From 7 a.m. Continuous Through Midnight SEVEN Days A Week Plus A Set Number Of Guest Meal Passes & Dining Dollars

• 79.5% of on-campus freshmen & 64.4% of on-campus sophomore respondents agreed or strongly agreed.

Page 20: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

I Would Prefer A Meal Plan With All Declining Balance Dollars That Can Be Spent On An A La Carte Basis In All Dining Locations On Campus

• 51.9% of on-campus freshmen & 55.7% of on-campus sophomore respondents agreed or strongly agreed.

Page 21: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Possible Future Direction for Dining Services: Anytime Dining

• Meal Plan Options• Unlimited Bronze: Unlimited access to four

residential dining venues during operating hours plus 4 guest meal passes & $200 in Dining Dollars per semester

• Estimated price: $1,600/semester (current combined price of Bronze plan)

• Unlimited Silver: Same privileges as Unlimited Silver plus 6 guest meal passes and $300 in Dining Dollars per semester

• Unlimited Gold: Same privileges as Unlimited Silver plus 8 guest meal passes and $400 in Dining Dollars

• All residential students would be required to purchase Unlimited Bronze but could buy up.

Page 22: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Considerations

• Anytime Dining in Founders, Kreischer, McDonald & The Commons• Provides meaningful freshmen experience• Unlimited access during operating hours• Unlimited seconds• Flexible & fits students’ lifestyle needs• No “meal swipes”• No leftover $ /unused meals• Promotes community bonding/building• Appeals to parents/families• China vs. disposables (cost &

sustainability)• Generally lower food/labor costs

• Hours of operation:• Extended hours of operation in residential

dining venues where gross profit is higher• Curtailed hours in some retail venues

Page 23: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Considerations

• Proposed hours of operation in Founders, Commons, Kreisher, McDonald• Founders: 7 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday-Friday• Commons: 7 a.m-8 p.m. Monday-Friday• Kreischer: 7 a.m.-1 a.m. Monday-Sunday• McDonald: 7 a.m.-Midnight, Monday-

Sunday

Page 24: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Discussion: Residential Dining

• All venues will eventually need to be renovated to various extents to accommodate Anytime Dining.

• Changes include:• Re-evaluate/relocate dedicated entrances &

egresses.• Re-evaluate & relocate control points into the

dining area from outside.• Install dish drop area since china will most likely

be used. A conveyor or tray accumulator is preferred over bussing carts.

• Reduce/eliminate prepackage & bottled carbonated & non-carbonated products.

• Emphasize display cooking/made-to-order options.• Emphasize self service & made to order options.• Install new checker stations.

• Install biometric hand readers at each checker station in each location.

• In short-term make shift set ups, consider using induction cook tops for display cooking in dining areas.

• Spruce up dining areas.• Offer products like Starbuck;s coffee & espresso

bars in each residential dining location.

Page 25: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Discussion: Residential Dining

• Expand menu variety to enhance value.• Include value-added concepts such as BGSUbs,

Salads By Design, Mama Margie’s Pizza, Starbuck’s coffee and/or operator’s self-branded concepts in each anytime dining locations.

• Serve a wide variety of popular menu items (pizza, subs, pasta sushi, vegetarian, quesadillas, etc.) well into the evening to reinforce the value of anytime dining.

• Make a big fresh salad bar with generous amounts of wide variety of popular & unique items a center piece in each anytime dining venue.

• Provide trayless service• Reduce food cost, energy cost, water usage, save

money• Environmentally friendly (big trend on college

campuses)• 78.9% of overall survey respondents support

trayless dining.• 80.2% & 80.3% of on-campus freshmen &

sophomore survey respondents support trayless dining

Page 26: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Discussion: Residential Dining

• Takeout• Survey respondents would like takeout

available from the residential dining venues.

• 36.6% & 30.5% of on-campus freshmen respondents said that based on the proposed changes to the residential dining venues, they would expect to take food out of the current residential dining venues occasionally & often, respectively.

• 43.8% & 31.5% of on-campus sophomore respondents said that they would expect to take food out occasionally & often, respectively.

• Takeout service could be available as part of an anytime dining program assuming residential dining venues offered trayless service.

• Access system/customer takeout usage would need to be monitored to ensure customers were not abusing the privilege.

Page 27: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Discussion: Retail Dining

• Maintain current campus c-stores• Future product mix

• Items rated as very important included:– Bottled beverages– Dairy products– Fresh produce– Bread– Bagels & breakfast sandwiches– Spreads– Chips/salty snacks– BGSUbs– Fountain beverages– Self-serve coffee & tea– Frozen entrees– Cereal

• Proposed hours of operation• Temptations: 2 p.m.-11 p.m. Monday-Sunday• Kravings: 11 a.m.-7 p.m. Monday-Friday, 8 a.m.-

11 p.m. Saturday & Sunday• Commons Marketplace:7:30 a.m.-Midnight,

Monday-Friday, 11 a.m.-Midnight Saturday & Sunday

Page 28: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Discussion: Retail Dining

• BTSU• Significantly increase participation

among commuters in BTSU.• Continue to allow a limited amount

of Dining Dollars to be used in these venues.

• Maintain current policies (i.e. meal plan money before 10 a.m. only).

• Maintain current hours of operation for the Nest (7:30 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday-Friday).

• Maintain current options & hours in other dining venues in the BTSU.

Page 29: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Discussion: Possible Outcomes

• Increased in perceived value among meal plan holders.

• Decrease in complaints about pricing.

• Increased participation among non-required meal plan holders.

• Increased capacity for non-meal plan holders in the BTSU.

• Dining perceived as an amenity to living on campus.

• Dining could become an important recruiting/retention tool with cutting edge programming.

• BGSU’s residential & dining program more competitive with peer institutions & other colleges.

Page 30: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

• Base year calculated from document “UDS Financial Ops Pro Forma 10 as submitted to Consultants 2008 09 11—5800/5400

Five Year DRAFT Financial Projections: Status Quo vs. Anytime Dining

Status Quo: A La Carte Anytime DiningProjected Board Revenue: $86,179,700 (including forfeitures)

Projected Total Revenue: $107,056,900

Projected Total Expenses: $107, 449,100

Net Deficit: -392,200

Projected Board Revenue: $84,769,829

Projected Total Revenue: $121,537,266

Projected Total Expenses: $102,194,692

Net Surplus: $20,118,237

Assumptions:

• Extended hours at all residential venues.

• Unlimited access to residential dining/more self service=reduced labor

• Lower food costs in residential dining venues (37% vs. 31%)

• Eliminated pizza delivery service/curtailed some retail hours

• Significantly increased revenue potential in retail venues, particularly in BTSU

• PKC factored in projected changes in enrollment (require confirmation from BG)

• Assumed more juniors would start buying Anytime Dining meal plans in Year 3

• Model assumes self operation and does not include commissions paid to a foodservice contractor.

Page 31: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

• All calculations per BGSU document “UDS Financial Ops Pro Forma 10 as submitted to Consultants 2008 09 11”

FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

19,585,800$ 20,585,800$ 21,585,800$ 22,585,800$ 23,585,800$

Commission Potential FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 201420% 3,917,160$ 4,117,160$ 4,317,160$ 4,517,160$ 4,717,160$ 25% 4,896,450$ 5,146,450$ 5,396,450$ 5,646,450$ 5,896,450$ 30% 5,875,740$ 6,175,740$ 6,475,740$ 6,775,740$ 7,075,740$

Cost Recovery FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014Maint/Repairs Expense/Union Rent 641,500 654,300 667,400 680,700 694,300Utilities 821,700 871,000 905,800 942,000 979,700Miscellaneous Expense 571,500 582,900 594,600 606,500 618,600Total 2,034,700 2,108,200 2,167,800 2,229,200 2,292,600

Cost Recovery & Commissions FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 201420% 5,951,860 6,225,360 6,484,960 6,746,360 7,009,76025% 5,718,150 6,017,450 6,302,250 6,588,450 6,876,15030% 7,910,440 8,283,940 8,643,540 9,004,940 9,368,340

Dining Services Projected Revenue:

Discussion: Financial Horizon

Page 32: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Collaboration

Colleges with Successful Anytime Dining Programs

• Catholic University of America• Gettysburg College• Hiram College• Michigan State University• SUNY Cortland• University of Connecticut• University of Georgia• University of New Hampshire• Wellesley College• Wheaton College

Page 33: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Dining Issues

Discussion: Catering

• Offer one-stop “shopping” if possible.

• Offer three tiers of service• Presidential: High-profile events• Standard: Banquets &

luncheons• Budget: No delivery/pick up

• Expanded menu options• Online menus• Online ordering & confirmation• Consider more upscale

offerings Stadium Club & Suites• Carving stations• Display cooking• Upscale dessert (dessert cart?)

Page 34: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN

Next Steps

Discussion:

• All draft financial projections need to be reviewed & approved by UDS/BGSU

• Questions & Answers