armillaria root rot - fabi · 2017-03-06 · armillaria root rot a new disease of cut- flower...
TRANSCRIPT
10E -
Armillaria root rotA new disease of cut- flower
proteas in South Africa
INTRODUCTION
Armillaria spp. are voracious pathogens of tree s andshrubs throughout the world. They survive either aspathogens, saprobes or perthobes (an organism ableto utilis e de ad ti s sues in living hosts) of woodymaterial(Gregory et al. ,1991). As facu lt at ivenecrotrophs (pathogens) these fun gi kill living tissuesof woody hosts and then utilise the tissues as a nutrientsour ce (Kilc et a l., 1991). In th e sap rob ic mode,Armillaria spp. 3fC wood decomposers aiding therecycling of nutri ents in ecosystems. Pathogeni cA rmi ll aria spp. ca us e major los s e s to for e str y(espec ially nati ve fores ts but also to co mme rcialplantations) world-wide, and also occur on fruit treesand ornamental plants. They have cause d losses toProteaceae in Africa (Kenya, Tanzania, South Mrica),Australia, Madeira, New Zeal and, United State s ofAmerica (California, Hawaii ) and Zimbabwe. In someof these countrie s where A rmillaria root rot occursin commercial cut-flower plantations , losses arc ofgreat econom ic s ignificanc e to producers. Thi sdisease has nev er been recorded on indigenousProteaceae in South Africa, although it was noted onAustralian Proteaceae growing in this country(Doidge, 1950) . Thus, in South Afri ca Armillaria hasnot po sed a threat to either the natural flora or tocommercial production of Proteaceae.In a recent investigatio n into the cause of decline anddeath of Protea scolymocephala (L.) Reichard, atKirstenbosch, we were surprised to discover typic alsigns of Armillaria root rot. The significance of thisfinding for conser vation and Proteaceae farmers needsto be assessed. General information about the genu sArmillaria, and the diseases that it causes, is providedhere. Other than reporting this dis ease for the firsttime, we also discuss the significance of this recordto the Protea industry in South Afr ica.
s. Denman ', M .P.A . Ccetaee",
B.D. Wingfield', M.J. Wingfield'
and P. W. Crous '.
I Deportment of Plant Pathology, University of
Stellenbosch. Privote Bog XI, Motieland 7602.
2Departme nt of Genetics, Tree Patholo gy Cooperative Programm e (TPCP) , Fore str y and
Agriculturol Biot echnology Institute (FABI),
University of Pret orio, Pretoria 0002.
JDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology,
Tree Pathology Co-operotive Progromme (TPCP) ,
Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute
(FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002 .
Taxonomy and IdentificationThe ta xonomy of Armilloria has been
problematic mainly because it was assumed
that Armillaria mel/eo (Vah l:Fr.) Kummer
sensu lato (in the widest sense) wa s 0
pleo morphic (multiple formed) species that
occurred in Asia, Europe and North America
(Singer 19 5 6 ). This res ulted in d ifferent
species being lumped together under the
name A. mel/ea . Thus Armillaria root- and
butt-rot was frequently incorrectly attributed
to A. mel/ea . Although this might seem to
be a rather academic matter, it is important
to know the correct species identification of
the pathogen that affects spe cific crops .
This ensures that appropriate disease
control and management practices can be
se lected and imp lemented.
With the d iscove ry of mating co m pa t ibility t e sts
(H intikko, 19 7 3 ) and the a dvent of molecu lar
techniques as an aid to species identification, the
taxono mic uncerta inties within Armillaria are bei ng
re so lved . Cu rre nt ly, Volk a nd Bur d sh oll ( 1995)
recog nise A. melleo as th e type (or representative)
of the ge nus and accept 38 spec ies . Acco rding to
Volk a nd Burdsall (20 00) t he genus Armillaria, is
reserved for facu ltat ively paras it ic (non-ob ligate)
root- an d butt-rot fungi t hat produce rhizomorphs .
IdentificationArmillaria is an Agaric (0 so-ce lled mushroo m or
toadstoo l [Ken d rick 19 9 2] ) and th e fruitbodies
(basid iome s or, more sim ply, m ushrooms) when
produced, are one of the ways this fungus can be
identified (Fig . 10) . The main compon ent po rts of
m ushrooms are t he cop (pi leus) a nd the sta lk
(stipe) . and both of these m a y have other
characteristic features. Th e pileus of Armillaria is
fleshy and ra nges in colou r from yellow, honey-beige
to tawny or cigar brown (Wat ling et 01., 19 9 1).
Fig. la . Basidiomes (fruitbodies I mushrooms) of Armillaria mellea
fou nd on decaying oak trees in the Company Gardens in Cape Town
T he stipe is cent ra lly situ a ted in the cop, fibrous
to fle shy, often becoming ho llow with maturity. An
a nnulus (0 me mbranous ring/ve il of tissue) preva ils
on t he stipe (Fig . 1b) and fruitbod ie s may arise
from white fan- like mycelium (Fig . 2) or from black
rh izomorphs (Fig . 3). The rh izomorphs ore un usua l
macroscopic features that are comprised of hard,
block, me lon ised cells which form long string-like
structu res under the gro und, from which the
common term "shoe -string" rhizomorphs, takes its
nome . Rh izomorphs enab le the pathogen to
spread f ro m pla nt to p lant th rough the soi l.
Armillaria can be cultured in a Petri dish containing
cultu re medium where the rhizomorphs are often seen
(Fig. 4).
Insid e the cop of Armillaria f ruiti ng bo d ies, th e
la me llae or gi lls th a t ca rry th e spores of t he fungus
are ivory co loured init ially but become dark with age
(Wat ling et 01., 1991) . The spore print (mode by
p lac ing t h e cop of the m ushroom, gi lls fac ing
downwards, on a piece of coloured paper overn ight)
is white . T he basidiomes usually arise at the base
of infected trees an d shrubs and occur as solitary
individuals or in clusters.
Fig. lb . A basidiome (fruitbody I mushroom) of Armillaria mellea
note the annulus (or ve il of tissue ) on the st ipc
However, basidiomes are produced seasonally, and
therefore a re often not present for identificat ion
pu rposes . The web of tough, white mycelium that is
found below the bark of infected plants (Fig. 2) is
characteristic of Armillaria.
Recognition of the taxonomic significance of mating
com patib ility between sing le spore c u ltu res of
Armillar ia, and t h e deve lopment of mol e cula r
techniques have recently aided species differentiation
in this g e n us ( Ha rrington and Wingfie ld, 1995,
Coetzee et 01 ., 2 0000) . The lock of fo rmation of
rhizomorphs and scarcity of basidiomes in Afri can
species ma kes identification difficult in these regions
(Swift, 1968). Therefore, the morphologica l features
that are present must be studied, and mating tests
between single spore isolates and sequencing of
various parts of the pathogen's genome must be carried
out to relia bly identify the fungus to species leve l. The
latter of these techn iques is expensive and specialised
expertise is required to carry out tests.
Fig. 2. Whi te, fan-like mycelium of Armillaria bel ow the bark of
an infected Protea scolymocephala plant found in Kirs tenbosch
G arde ns , Cape Town .-
Fig . 3 . Black sh oe-s tr ing I boot-lace r hizo mor phs ofA rmillaria be low tbe bark of an inf ected Spruce tree in
Scotland
Fig. 4. Armillaria from infected Prutea scolym ocephala , cultured in a
Pe tr i di sh . The long sp idery ou tgrowths are the rh izomorph s
Epidem iology
Armillaria thr ives in mo ist conditions (Porter et ot ,
19 9 6 ) b ut is re s t rict ed by excess ively wet,
waterlogged, co ld, or dry condit ions (Kile et 01. ,
199 1). Infect ion can ta ke plac e throug h the soil by
rhizomorph contact with roots, or by mycelium from
infe cted roo ts colo nising healthy roo ts that are in
close proxi.mity to t he infected ones (via root to root
contact) (Garraway et 01. , 1991 ; Morrison et 01.,
19 91 ) . Th is fa ct holds serious impl ica t io ns for
fa rme rs pla nting young pla nts in o ld stands where
p lants ha ve d ied as a re sult of infe ct io n by thi s
pa t hogen, a nd the infected roots rema in in the so il.
Althou gh rhizom o rp hs do na t require wounds or
weakened poin ts in root tissues to initia te infection,
roots with t hese afflictions can all serve as infect ion
co urts (Morr iso n et a/., 199 1). Stu mps of fe lled trees
can be infected by bas idiaspores (Rishbeth, 19 70)
but thi s is considered a fa irly uncommon event and
there is n o ev idence to support t he id e a tha t
basidiospores infect roots directly (Redfern and Filip,
19 9 1).
Armillaria on Proteaceae throughout theworldThere are not many records of Arm illaria spp . on
Proteaceae throughout the world . Howeve r, th is
pathogen has be en reco rded f rom a number of
co untries. These include Australia (von Broemb se n,
1989; Forsbe rg, 1993; Porter et 0/., 1996), Califo rnia
(Forr et 0/., 1989), Hawaii (Loemmlen and Bego 1974),
Kenya (Anonymous , 1960) Madeira (Rodriguez, 2000),
New Zea la nd (Pen nycook, 1989), South Africa (Doidge ,
195 0), Tonzonio (Anono mous, 196 0) a nd Zimbabwe
(Musuko et 0/., 199 8).
In Australia Arm illaria JuteobuboJino Wat ling & Kile is
the main species that causes root rot of Proteaceae
(Kile et of., 1983, Pearce et ol., 1986 , Shives, 1989,
von Broembsen et ol., 1989 ). The dist ribution of this
disease on Proteaceae in Aust ralia is very wide, ranging
from Dwellingu p, Monjimup, Pem berton and Perth in
the west, to th e south and east regions . In Sydney,
South African Proteaceae ore especia lly susceptible to
A. futeabubolina (Pw. Crous pers. obs. ). The first above
ground symptoms often shown by infect ed plants are
undersized leaves that drop prematurely (Porter et 0/.,
1996). Sig ns of the pa thogen includ e th e creom
coloured web of mycelium below the bark, block "shoe
string" rhizomorphs that a lso form below the bark a nd
run a long the roots and in the soil. Hon ey colou red
mushrooms may occu r at the base of infected plants
(Porter et 0 /., 1996). Proteoceous hosts known to be
infe cted with A. luteobubalina in Australia include
Banksia gran dis Willd an d B. seminuda (A.s . George )
Rye, (Pea rce et of., 1986, Shives. 19 89), Grevillea
robusta R. Br., (Kile et 0/., 1983, Shives , 1989) an d
Hakea prostrata R. Br. (Kile et of., 1983, Shives, 1989),
and severa l members of the genus Protea (P.W. Crous
pe rs. obs. ). An un ide ntified Armilla ria sp. has a lso
been recorded on Dryandra palycepha la Benth (Shives,1989).
According to Laemmlen a nd Bego ( 1974), Bega (1962)
made the first report of A mel/eo in Hawa ii, when he
fou nd this pathogen on G_ robusta . However, no
bas idiomes (mushrooms) of Armillaria ha ve eve r been
found on the island (Loemm len a nd Bego, 1974). In
view of the recent ad vances in the ta xonom y and species
ide ntification of this genus, th e identifica t ion of th is
pathogen on Proteaceae in Ha wa ii, probably needs
to be re assess e d. O n an oth er is la nd whe re
Proteaceae ar e cu ltivate d, namely Modeiro, Armillaria
ha s been isolated from Protea ceou s hosts, but the
pa thog en has not yet been identified to species level
(Moura and Rodrigues, 2000).
--~.- ----.- ..-...-.._-.-.-.---=.---_._-.---:...=-
Interestingly, a num ber of differen t species of Armillaria
have been reported on Proteac eae from New Zea land .
Both Armillaria /imonea (Stevenso n) Boesew inke l a nd
Armillaria no vae -ze/andiae (Ste venson) Herink. were
found on Knightia exce/sa R.Br. a nd the latter was also
reported on G. robusta (Pen nycook, 1989).
Africa n reco rds of Armillaria on Protea ceae a re very sca nt
but th e fungus ha s been record ed on G. robusto in
Kenya and Ta nza nia (Anonomyous, 1960) as well os in
So uth Afric a ( Doidge, 1950) . In Zim babwe on
unidentified Armilforia sp . has been reporte d from Q
Protea sp (Musuko et 0/., 1998) .
Armillaria in Sout h Afric aUntil now the only record of Armillaria on Proteaceae in
So ut h Africa, was o n G. rabusta (Doidg e , 1950, ).
According to Coetzee et 0/ ., (Coetzee et 0 /., 20000)
only two species of Armillaria a re thu s far known occ ur
in South Africa, Armillaria fuscipes Petch a nd A . me/leo.
In view of the recent ad vances in the taxonomy of
Armillaria , previous records (pre-1996) of this fun gu s
should be referred to mere ly as Armilforia sp. because
the spe cies identity is no long er ce rta in. A rmilla ria
fU5cipes is an importa nt pat hogen of pines (Coetzee et
0/ ., 20000), especially in the northern ports of the
country. The on ly relia ble record of A. mel/eo in South
Africa is on oak trees in the Comp a ny Ga rdens in the
centre of Cape Town where it was ap parently introdu ced
by eoriy settlers (Coetzee et 0/., 2000b). Arm illa ria sp.
(originally as Armiflaria mellea) has been recorded as 0
pathogen on Aroucoria brazi/iana A. Rich. (mo nke y
puzzle trees) (Doidge 1950 ), on Cedrefa odorata Linn.
(West Indian ced a rs) (Doidge 1950), Cupressus /usitanica
(cypress) (Doidge 1950), De/onix reg ia Rof. (fla mboyant
trees) (Doidge 1950), Eriobatrya japonica (Thunb.) Lind!.
(Ioquats) ) (Doidge 1950), Euco /yptus panicufota Sm .
(Doidge 1950), Grevillea robusta (Doidge 1950), Parinari
cu ra t ell ifo /ia (Mo bo lo plum) (Doid ge 195 0 ), Musa
cavendishii Lomb. (ban anas) (Brodrick, 1971 ), Pinus spp.
(Doidg e 1950), Q ue rcus spp. (oa ks) (Doidge 1950 ),
s yzygium ge rrardii (Ho rv. Ex Hook. f . ) Burtt. Da vy
(forest wote rwoo d) (Doidge 1950), a nd Toano cil iata
M.J. Roe m. (toon trees) (Doidge 1950 ). Armillaria
sp . (o riginolly a s A. m ell ea) wos also re po rte d by
Doid ge ( 1950) on severa l ot her hosts, but as th e se
re po rts we re unconfi rmed they we re not listed by
Doidg e et 0/., 195 3, Gorter, 197 7 or Crous et 0/.,
200 0
In 1996 A. mellea, a deva stating pathogen of ma ny
woody species wo rld -wid e wa s ide ntifie d in t he
"Compa ny Gardens" in the centre of Ca pe Town on
oa k t rees (Coetzee e t a/ ., 2000b). An int rig uing
sto ry of ho w t h is fu ngu s must ha ve be e n
int rod uced into Cape Town du ring the ea rly Ca pe
Dutch settlement (1652) on one of the potted plants
(suc h as citrus or gra pevine) is presented by Coetzee
et 0/. (2000b). Ifthe hypot hes is proposed by Caetzee
et 0/. (2000b) is correct, and this fung us has not
been reported else where in the Western Cape until
now, the spread of th is pat hogen ha s obviously been
con ta ined up to the presen t.
Armillaria on Proteaceae in SouthAfrica - A ne w recordDeclining P. sco/ymocepha/a plants were encounte red
in th e plan ted beds a t Kirst en bos ch Na ti o nal
Botanical Gardens, Ki rstenbosch, Cape Town in May
2000. The leaves of affecte d plants were chlorotic
and the plants did not look healthy (Figs. 5 a nd 6) .
When the infected plants were removed fro m the
soi l t he roots we re blackened (not unlike typical
Phytophthora root rot symptoms) a nd there was a
la ck of feeder roots. Upon cutt ing into the crown
t issue, wh ite myceli um typ ica l of the Armillaria
myce lial fans was present in the cambial region (Fig.
7). Isola t io ns were ma de and the pathog e n was
obtained in culture (Fig. 4). Cultures are ma inta ined
in the Depa rt ment of Plant Pa t ho log y cu lture
co llection, Univers ity of Ste llenbosch Private Ba g
X l , Matieland 7600 - Culture numbers STE-U 3773
an d STE-U 3774. No fruiting structures (basidia mes)
Fig . 5 . A Protea scolymocephala pl ant infected with Armillaria in
Kirst enbosch Ga rd ens. Note the chlorotic lowe r leaves and dead
branches
were present nor were rh izomorphs obse rve d, thus
identification to species level will have to be derived from
molecular studies . This work is unde rway a nd the results
prom ise to be most intriguing. One possibility is th at the
exot ic A. mel/eo ha s esca ped from the Company Ga rdens
an d ente red Kirstenbosch . Alternat ively, t his cou ld be
another species of Armillaria an d possib ly even something
new for South Africa.
Fi g. 6 . A Prot ea scolym ocephala p lant in fec t ed wi t h Armillaria in
Kir ste nbosch Gar dens . Not e the chlorotic lowe r leaves, de ad br anc hesand unhe althy ap pea rance of th e plan t . The wh ite mycelial fans can be
seen below th e bark on the main root of the plant
Fig. 7. Wh ite mycelial fans typical of Armillaria present below the bark in
the crown reg io n of P. scolymocephala plants infect ed with Armillaria in
Kir stenbosch Gardens
-------------- -- -----------_ .~-----
DiscussionArm illaria is a seriou s root rot pathogen of man y woody
hosts a nd in South Africa, th e most serious rootpathogen on Proteaceae that we have had to contendwith th us far is Phyt ophthora cinnamomi Ra nds,although in the past two years Fusarium wilt ca usedby Fusa rium oxysporum Schlecht . ha s become aproblem. Does thi s new record mean that we now
hove a third serious root pathogen that we need to
keep in check? In order to answer this que stion Q
few facts need to be esta blished . Firstly the speciesidentifica tio n of the Arm illaria able to infect P.scolymocepho/la must be resolved. The host rangeof this pat hogen must be established and then thebig challenge will be to answer the question of howth is pat hoge n a ppeared in Kirsten bosch Ga rde ns.Once these facts are establis hed it will be easi er toestimate the potentia l impact of this pathogen to
the South Africa n Proteaceae indust ry. However, if thefu ngu s is Armillaria m e l/eo, th ere may be se rio usimplications for indigenous vegetation on Ta ble Mountaina nd it will be essential to era dicate this pat hogen beforeit beco mes a thre a t to bot h nat u ral a nd c ultiva tedProteaceae in the Western Cape.The flowerbeds at Kirstenbosch a re co vered with barkchips that help retain soil moisture and whe n th eydecompose th ey return nutrients to th e soil, they a lso he lpprevent soil erosion and made rate the tem perature of th esoil. Armillaria spp . are common wood rotting fungi thusit is quite possible that this pathoge n wos introduced intoKi rstenbosch Ga rdens on the bar k chips that have beenst rewn over the flower beds. Growers need to be warnedof the potentia l risk involved with the practice of coveringbeds with bark chips espec ia lly lf they were de rived fromdiseased, rotted or dead trees or shrubs .
AcknowledgementsWe th an k Dr J Taylor for her co n tri b ut ion o f lite ra tur e res ources and fo r reviewing the ma n uscr ip t. We also thank Ioland e Roux and Ja mesTown send who b rou ght thi s d ise ase to O UT at te ntio n and ass is ted with field co llect ions.
ReferencesAnonymou s. 1961. Fore ign Diseases of Forest Tree s of the World . 361 pp .Bega, R.y. 1962. Report to the Director , Pacific Southwest Fore st and Range Expe rim ent Sta tion, Berkeley, Californ ia. 7pp .Ccc tzc e, M.PA. ; Wingfield, B.D. ; Cout inho, TA . and Wingfield , J\iI.j. 2000a. Ide ntificat ion of the causal agent ofArmillan a roo t rot of Pi/JUS species inSouth Africa. Mycologia n: 777-78 5.Coct zee, M.P.A., Wingfield, B.D., Harri ngton, 'I:C ., Steimel, L , Couu nho, T.A. and Wingfield, 1\1.]. 2000b.Armillaria mellea sensu stricto int rod uced inSouth Africa. (Molecular Ecology, subm itte d) .Crous, Po\\-:, Phillips,Aj .L. and Baxter, A.P. ZOOO. Phytopath ogenic fungi from South Africa. Dep art ment of Plant Pathology; University of Ste llenbosch,Sou th Africa . 358 pp.Doidge, E.M. 1950. The Sou th African Fungi and Lichens to the end of 1945. Bothalia 5: 1094 pp .Doidge, E.M., Bot tomley, A.~I. , van der Plank, j .E. and Pauer, G.D . 1953. A revised list of Plant Diseases in South Africa. Science Bulle tin 346: 122 pp.Dept. of Agriculture, Government Printe r, Pretoria.Farr, D.E , Bills, G.F., Ch amuris, G. P.and Rossman, A. 1989. Fungi on Plan ts an d Plan t Produ cts in th e United Sta tes . •-\PS Press, Minnesota. 1252 pp.Forsb erg, L. (1993). Protea Diseases and th eir Cont rol. Queen sland Govern ment , Dept . of Pr imary Ind ust ries. Brisbane.Garraway, ;\1.0. , l Iu tterm ann , A. and Wargo, 1~~1. 1991. Ontogeny and Physiology In: Armillar ia root disease - (Eds ) C.G. Shaw and G.A. Ri le. UnitedSta te s Dep artm ent of Agriculture Fores t Service - Agricult ur e Hand book no. 691, Washing ton D.C. 233 PI"Corter, G.J,M.t\. 1977. Index of Plant Pathogen s and the Diseases they cause in Cult ivated Plants in South Africa. Scientific Pamphlet 392. Departm entof Agricultur al Tec hn ical Services, Govc rnm an t Prin ter, Pretoria.Gregory. S.C., Rishbeth, j . and Shaw, C.G. 1991. Path ogeni city and Vir ulence. Tn: Armi llari a root disease - (Eds) e .G. Shaw and GA Kilt . UnitedStates Dep ar tm ent of Agricult ure Fore st Service - Agriculture Hand book no. 691, washington D.C. 233 pp .Harrington, T.C. and Wingfield, B.D. 1995. A PCR-based identificat ion method for species of Anni/laria. Mycologia 87: 280-288.Hi ntikka, Y. 1973. A note on the polarity ofAr milfan'a mellea. Karst cnia 13: 32-39.Kend rick, B. 1992. T he Fift h Kingdo m, 2r>d edition, Mycologue pub lications, Newb uryport, e SA.. 406 p p.Kile, G.A. . Watling , R., Malajczu k, N. and Shcarer, B. L. 1983. Occu rrence ofAnnillana lnteobubalina Watling & Kile in Western Australia. AustralasianPlant Pathology 122: 18-ZO.Rile, GA., Mcljonald, G. l. and Byler, ]. \\ : 1991. Ecology and disease in na tural forests. In : Armilla r ia root di sease - (Eds) - e.G. Shaw an d G.A. Ri le.United Sta tes Departm ent of Agriculture Forest Service - Agric ulture Handbook no. 69 1,Washingto n D.C. 233 pp.Laemmlen, F. and Beg a, R.Y. 1974. Hosts ciArmillaria mettea in Hawaii. Plant Disease Repor te r 58: 102- 103.Morrison, D.j., Williams, R.E. and Whitney, R.D. 1991. Infect ion, Disease Dev elopmen t, Diagnosis and De tection. In: Armillar ia roo t dise ase - (Eds) e .G. Sha w and G~\.. Kile. United States Department ofAgr iculture Forest Service - Agricultu re Handbook no. 691,Washi ng ton D.C. 233 pp.Musuka, j ., Cole , D.L. and Ylguni, C. 1998. Li st of Plant Diseases in Zi mbabwe. Dep artment of Research Specialist Services, Ministry of Lan ds andAgriculture, ITarare, Zim babwe.Pearce, M. H., Malajczuk , N. and Rile, G. A. 1986. T he occurrence an d effects ofArmillaria luteobubalina in the kan-i (Euca lyptus divenicolor F.Mucll.)forests of Weste rn Aust ralia. Aust ralian Forest Research 16: 243-259.Pennycook, S. R. 1989. Plant di seases recorded in New Zealand vol. I . Plant Diseases Division, D.S.I.R.: Auckland.Port er , L, Pascoe , L, de Boer, D. and Ziehrl, A. 1996. Major diseases of wild flowers: In: Growing wildflowers for profit (Ed s) - Cass , A ., Slate r, T. andTregea, W. Insti tu te for Hort icultural Developmen t , Proceedings of a workshop he ld in 1995. Victo ria, Australia. Pp 23-3 9.Redfern , D.B. an d Filip, G.M. 1991. Inoculum and Infcction. In: Arm illaria root disease - (Eds) C.G . Shaw and G~\.. Rile . United Stat es De partmentof Agric ulture For est Service - Agric ulture Handbook no. 691, Washington D .e. 233 pp .Rishbeth , j . 1970. The role of besidioepores in stump infection hy Armillaria mel/ea. In: Root diseases and soilborne pathogen s Proceedings of theSym posium held in 1968. [Ed s] - Toussoun, TA.• Rega,RY and Nelson, P..E. Univer sity of Californ ia Press , Berkeley.Mou ra, M.F. and Rodrigues, P..F. 2000. Fungal Diseases on Proteas in Madeira . Proceed ings of the 10'" In tern ational Protea Assoc iation Co nference ,Puerto de la Cruz , Ten erife, Spa in.Shivas, R. G. 1989. Fu ngal and bacterial disea se!' of plants in West ern Australia. Journ al of the Royal Society of\Ves tern Aus tra lia 72: 1-62.Singer, R. 1956. TheArmillan"ella mellea group. Lloydia 19: 176- 187.Swift , l\LJ. 1968. Inh ibition of rh izomorph development ovArmdkxria mellea in Rhod esian forest soils. Transac tion s of th e Brit ish Mycological Soci ety55: 241-247,V1ok, T.j . and Burdsall, H.II. 1995. A nom enclatural study o fA rmillana and Armi llariella species. Synop sis Fun gorum 8. Oslo: Fung iflora. 121 pp .Vlok, ' I: j . and Burd sall, l l.H . 2000. T he state of taxonomy of th e gcnus A,.millana. (htt p://v,'Ww.wise.edulhotany/fungi/a r lll.htm l -6 j un e 2000).Wat ling, R., Kile, G _-\.. and Burdsall, H.H.jr. 1991. Nomenclature, Taxonomy and Idcnti fication . ln: Armillaria root disease - (Eds) C.G. Shaw and G.A.Kile. Un ited States Dep ar tm ent of Agricult ure Forest Service - Agric ulture Hand book no. 691, Washington D.C. 233 pp.Von Broem bsen , S.L. (1989) . Han dbook of Diseases of cut- flower proteas. Int ern ational Prctea Association, Victori a, Austra lia . 43 pp.
© University of Stellenbos ch Printi ng sponsored by SAPPEX