armin petrascheck federal office for water and geology · 2011. 4. 7. · floods august 2005 in...

30
Floods August 2005 in Switzerland Bern 2005 Armin Petrascheck Federal office for water and geology

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Floods August 2005 in Switzerland

    Bern 2005

    Armin PetrascheckFederal office for water and geology

  • Causes of the floods was heavy rainfall in central Switzerland

  • The rainfall caused extreme discharges in rivers of the densely populated regions

  • Damage Areas 2005

  • Vulnerability: Danger for lifeFlood Statistics of Switzerland

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    1972

    1973

    1974

    1975

    1976

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    1986

    1987

    1988

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    Year

    Cas

    ualit

    ies

    Out of 64 causalities 23 inside the house 41 outside26 wrong behavior13 in the car9 camping

    Aug. 2005 6 victimsAverage. 2 Victims/year

  • 0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    1100

    1200

    1300

    1400

    1500

    1600

    1700

    1800

    1972

    1973

    1974

    1975

    1976

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    1986

    1987

    1988

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    Years

    Dam

    age

    of e

    vent

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    Sum

    of d

    amag

    es

    Damage Cor. Inflation Sum Sum with inflation

    Swiss Flood Damage StatisticAug. 20052500 Mio. CHF

  • Sept. 1868 (TI, GR, UR, VS)

    Juni 1910 (Deutschschweiz)

    Aug. 1987 (UR, TI, VS)

    Sept. 1993 (Oberwallis)

    Sept. 1993 (Tessin)

    Aug 1997 (Sachseln)

    Mai 1999 (Deutschschweiz

    Okt. 2000 (Wallis)

    Okt. 2000 (Tessin)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 Schäden der öffentlichen Hand private Schäden

    800480580

    80200650

    1200

    2500August 2005

    Comparison of damages

    Private

    Public

  • Type of ImpactStatic Flooding

    Damage parameter: water depth

    Large areas affected

  • Type of ImpactStatic Flooding

    High damage potential because of numerous cases but low risk for live

  • Type of ImpactStatic Flooding

    Related damages:Furniture, machineryWalls, especially if oil is involved

  • Type of ImpactStatic Flooding

    Defence by emergency barriers

  • Type of ImpactDynamic FloodingDamage parameter:Velocity and depth

    High danger for live

  • Type of ImpactDynamic Flooding

    Wood, sand and stones are transported by the water

  • Type of ImpactDynamic Flooding

    Damages are increased by the dynamic forces. The impact of floating debris or stones or the erosion of fundaments may damage the structure

  • Type of ImpactDynamic Flooding

    Defence byLocating on high ground,Permanent barriers orPrepared solid mobile elements

  • During large flood events the river can start to meander.

    22. August 2005

    Type of ImpactRiver bank erosion

  • Type of ImpactRiver bank erosion

    High damage: Leads to destruction

    Defence: River training measuresDeep foundations

  • Type of ImpactSlides and mudflow

    Damage parameter:Depth of slideVolume of movement

  • Type of ImpactSlides and mudflow

    DamageIn many cases complete destruction of the house

  • Type of ImpactSlides and mudflow

    DefenceFor deep slides stabilization measures for the slide must be applied

    For mudflows a reinforced wall on the backside can give good protection. Sometimes even temporary walls can keep the mud away from the building.

  • Type of ImpactDebris Flow

    Large mass movements with high velocitiesDamage parameter Hight of deposition

  • Type of ImpactDebris Flow

    Damage

    High dynamic impact can cause complete destruction

  • Keep space for the torrent

    No reconstruction of destroyedbuildings

    Type of ImpactDebris Flow

    Defence

    Strong retaining walls

  • Swiss strategy1. Knowledge of hazard

    Hazard maps show degree and extend

    Bsp. Steinibach NW

  • Swiss strategy

    2. Space for the river

    Space enables increase of discharge capacity and ecological improvement

    HQ

    embankmentriverbed-breadth

    embankment margin. stripe

    maintenance / bufferstripe

    riverside

    3m 1:2 3m1:2

  • Swiss strategy

    3. Reducing damages

    3.1 Maintenance of rivers and protection structures to keep present safety level

    3.2 Spatial planning measures to avoid an increase of damage potential

    • keep free high endangered areas (red)• adapted construction and local protection (permanent or mobile) in medium and low endangered areas (blue and yellow areas• restricted land use in areas necessary for retention and emergency measures

    River space

    Free space forextreme floods

    Protection

  • Swiss strategy

    3.3 Protection measures

    Increase safety where required,Include all types of measures in your planning and consider extreme events

    Emergencyplanning

    Improving dikes

  • Swiss strategy

    3.3 Protection measures

    consider extreme events

  • Swiss strategy

    4. Emergency Planning

    Be prepared for the unexpected

    5. InsuranceTo enable reconstruction if the damage occurs

  • FLOODS

    If you do notfind the strongman, who stops the flood, …... You have to livewith floods