arpa-e, fundamentals of gas separations and advanced carbon capture technologies

Upload: recsco2

Post on 14-Oct-2015

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Ge#ng to Know You

    1

    What is your background?

    Physical sciences or engineering Geology Policy or economics Something else

  • Outline

    2

    ARPA-E Background ARPA-E CCUS Investment Overview Gas SeparaBons Fundamentals CCUS State-of-the-Art Examples of ARPA-E Projects A Word on CO2 UBlizaBon

  • ARPA-E Mission

    3

  • Evolution of ARPA-E

    4

    2007RISING ABOVETHE GATHERING STORM PUBLISHED

    2007AMERICA COMPETES ACT SIGNED

    2009AMERICAN RECOVERY & REINVESTMENTACT$400M Appropriated

    2011FY2011 BUDGET$180M Appropriated

    2012FY2012 BUDGET$275M Appropriated

    2013FY2013 BUDGET$265M Appropriated

  • Creating New Learning Curves

    5

  • What Makes an ARPA-E Project?

    6

    BRIDGE Translates science into breakthrough technology Not researched or funded elsewhere Catalyzes new interest and investment

    IMPACT High impact on ARPA-E mission areas Credible path to market Large commercial application TRANSFORM Challenges what is possible Disrupts existing learning curves Leaps beyond todays technologies

    TEAM Comprised of best-in-class people Cross-disciplinary skill sets Translation oriented

  • Technology Acceleration Model

    7

  • ARPA-E CO2 Separation Programs/Projects

    8

    27%

    19% 13%

    24%

    13% 4%

    Funding by Technology Solvents

    Membranes

    Sorbents

    Phase Change

    Chemical Looping

    Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

    OPEN 2009 5 projects, $13.3 M

    2009 2014

    IMPACCT 15 projects, $39.9 M

    2010 2014

    OPEN 2012 2 projects, $3.0 M

    2013 2016

  • Focused Programs

    9

    Transportation Energy Technologies

    Stationary Energy Technologies

    Solar ADEPT

    REMOTE

    RANGE

    MOVE

    PETRO

    Electrofuels

    BEETIT

    GRIDS

    IMPACCT

    GENI

    ADEPT

    METALS SBIR/STTR REACT AMPED HEATS

    BEEST

    FOCUS

    SWITCHES

  • Development Pipeline: ARPA-Es Role

    10

  • Gas separation fundamentals/theory

    11

    Minimum thermodynamic work for separation of species into streams

    = = + In an isothermal and isobaric environment, minimum work for separation is equal to negative of difference in Gibbs free energy of separated final streams For an ideal gas mixture, partial molar Gibbs free energy for each gas is: /= +(/)

    Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox

  • Gas separation fundamentals (contd)

    12

    Total Gibbs free energy of an ideal gas mixture is therefore:

    = / Minimum work required to go from state 1 to states 2 and 3 is associated with free energy difference between product and reactant states getting to GA, GB, and GC

    Leading to minimum work required:

    /= +(/)

    Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox

  • Minimum Work of Separa9on Required

    13

    Minimum Work for Separation

    Published'in'APS'Report,'Feasibility'of'DAC'with'Chemicals'(2011)''Source: APS Report: Feasibility of DAC with Chemicals (2011)

  • 14

    Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox

    Real systems = more energy than thermodynamic minimum Second law efficiency: n = Wmin / Wreal

    Depending on technology, concentration, purity, etc. work is required to regenerate tech,

    compress CO2, etc.

    ACTUAL work depends on unit operations / extent of

    efficiencies.

  • 15

    Image courtesy RTI International

    State of the Art: Amine Capture

  • How its done today: amine solvents

    16 Image credits: RTI International, NETL

    mass transfer, kinetics lower CAPEX

    .: 2 mole amine / mol CO2

    but, watch dHabs

    CO2 pressure with minimal heat lower compression load lower parasitic steam use

  • Costs of CCUS

    17

    Transport Capture Storage Compression

    80% Capital Cost

    Energy required for CO2 separation, in parasitic load %

    Herzog, et al., Advanced Post-Combustion CO2 Capture, Clean Air Task Force (2009)

  • Ideal CO2 Capture Material

    18

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Rat

    e C

    onst

    ant (

    M-1

    s-1

    )

    Heat of Reaction (kJ/mol)

    OH-

    MEA

    DEA

    Piperazine

    High Reaction Rate

    Moderate Binding Energy

    Ideal Material

    Source: APS Report: Feasibility of DAC with Chemicals (2011)

  • FOA-1 & IMPACCT: Categories and Projects

    19

    Membranes Porifera Carbon nanotube membrane $1.2M

    United Technologies Research Center

    Facilitated transport w/ synthetic catalyst $1.9M

    University of Kentucky Solvent/membrane hybrid process $2M

    Georgia Tech MOF/polymer composite membranes $1M

    University of Colorado Gelled ionic liquid-based membranes $3.9M

    Sorbents Lehigh University Electric field desorption $0.5M

    Texas A&M Stimuli-responsive MOFs $1M

    MIT Electrochemical sorbent regeneration $1M

    LBNL High-throughput MOF discovery $3.9M

    ORNL Ionic liquids on hollow fiber support $0.8M

  • New Types of Membranes

    20

    New chemistries: gelled ionic liquids

    Ultra-thin, defect-free layers

    Flue gas from coal plant CO2

    CO2 N2 N2 N2 CO2 Clean gas out

    CO2 out

    Membrane

  • Towards 10,000 GPU with high selec9vity

    21

  • High-Throughput Adsorbent Discovery!Selectivity!

    Sample Number"

    0.15

    bar

    CO 2

    capa

    city (

    mm

    ol/g)

    "

    50 C"

    Capacity!

    H2NHNH2N

    NH2

    H2NN N

    N

    NH

    HN

    H2NHN

    NH2

    NNH2H2N

    H2N

    NH

    HN

    Rapid adsorbent discovery via high-throughput variation of metal-organic framework components" Alkylamine functionality endows metal-organic frameworks with high capacity, selectivity, and H2O tolerance"

  • Amine-grafted metal-organic frameworks reduce the amount of energy required to separate CO2" Fast kinetics and unusual adsorption process allow for rapid cycling with a 100 C adsorption temperature"

    Frameworks with Appended Alkylamines!

    MEA Baseline!

    mmen-Mg2(dobpdc)!

    Isobaric CO2 Adsorption!

    High-temperature Cycling! Regeneration Energy!

    Isothermal CO2 Adsorption!

    25 C "40 C"50 C"75 C"

  • FOA-1 & IMPACCT: Categories and Projects

    24

    Solvents / Catalysts Nalco pH-swing process $1.7M

    Codexis Direct evolution of enzymes $4.6M

    LLNL Enzyme analogues and encapsulation $3.6M

    Columbia University Catalytic enhancement of silicate weathering $1.3M

    RTI Non-aqueous solvents $2.5M

    Phase Change GE Global Research Liquid to solid phase change materials $3.7M

    Notre Dame University Phase changing ionic liquids $2.6M

    Alliant Tech Systems Supersonic capture duct $2.7M Sustainable Energy Solutions

    Cryogenic process $5.3M

    Chemical Looping Ohio State University Syngas looping process $7.1M

  • Cryogenic / phase change processes

    25

    AlternaBve route: take advantage of CO2s physical properBes (based on temperature and pressure) to separate out as solid SBll requires energy

    Can avoid direct contact chemical processes

    Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox

  • Supersonic Duct for CO2 Separa9on

    26

    Supersonic duct

  • Cryogenic Carbon Capture

  • Electrochemical Separa9on (ASU OPEN 2012)

  • ARPA-E Examples in Carbon Dioxide U9liza9on

    29

  • A Few Words on CO2 U9liza9on

    30

    UBlizaBon for chemicals is a daunBng task Worldwide, emissions from coal = 13 gt/yr, petrol = 11 gt/yr, gas = 6 gt/yr Top 5 chemicals would miBgate 2.5% of worldwide CO2 generated Chemical World (Mt) Market Size Sulfuric Acid 199.9 Nitrogen 139.6 Ethylene 112.6 Oxygen 100 Lime 283

    Geologic formation Worldwide storage capacity (Gt CO2)

    Deep saline aquifers 1,000-10,000 * Depleted oil/gas fields 200-900 Unmineable coal beds 100-300

    Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox

  • 31