arpa-e, fundamentals of gas separations and advanced carbon capture technologies
TRANSCRIPT
-
Ge#ng to Know You
1
What is your background?
Physical sciences or engineering Geology Policy or economics Something else
-
Outline
2
ARPA-E Background ARPA-E CCUS Investment Overview Gas SeparaBons Fundamentals CCUS State-of-the-Art Examples of ARPA-E Projects A Word on CO2 UBlizaBon
-
ARPA-E Mission
3
-
Evolution of ARPA-E
4
2007RISING ABOVETHE GATHERING STORM PUBLISHED
2007AMERICA COMPETES ACT SIGNED
2009AMERICAN RECOVERY & REINVESTMENTACT$400M Appropriated
2011FY2011 BUDGET$180M Appropriated
2012FY2012 BUDGET$275M Appropriated
2013FY2013 BUDGET$265M Appropriated
-
Creating New Learning Curves
5
-
What Makes an ARPA-E Project?
6
BRIDGE Translates science into breakthrough technology Not researched or funded elsewhere Catalyzes new interest and investment
IMPACT High impact on ARPA-E mission areas Credible path to market Large commercial application TRANSFORM Challenges what is possible Disrupts existing learning curves Leaps beyond todays technologies
TEAM Comprised of best-in-class people Cross-disciplinary skill sets Translation oriented
-
Technology Acceleration Model
7
-
ARPA-E CO2 Separation Programs/Projects
8
27%
19% 13%
24%
13% 4%
Funding by Technology Solvents
Membranes
Sorbents
Phase Change
Chemical Looping
Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
OPEN 2009 5 projects, $13.3 M
2009 2014
IMPACCT 15 projects, $39.9 M
2010 2014
OPEN 2012 2 projects, $3.0 M
2013 2016
-
Focused Programs
9
Transportation Energy Technologies
Stationary Energy Technologies
Solar ADEPT
REMOTE
RANGE
MOVE
PETRO
Electrofuels
BEETIT
GRIDS
IMPACCT
GENI
ADEPT
METALS SBIR/STTR REACT AMPED HEATS
BEEST
FOCUS
SWITCHES
-
Development Pipeline: ARPA-Es Role
10
-
Gas separation fundamentals/theory
11
Minimum thermodynamic work for separation of species into streams
= = + In an isothermal and isobaric environment, minimum work for separation is equal to negative of difference in Gibbs free energy of separated final streams For an ideal gas mixture, partial molar Gibbs free energy for each gas is: /= +(/)
Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox
-
Gas separation fundamentals (contd)
12
Total Gibbs free energy of an ideal gas mixture is therefore:
= / Minimum work required to go from state 1 to states 2 and 3 is associated with free energy difference between product and reactant states getting to GA, GB, and GC
Leading to minimum work required:
/= +(/)
Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox
-
Minimum Work of Separa9on Required
13
Minimum Work for Separation
Published'in'APS'Report,'Feasibility'of'DAC'with'Chemicals'(2011)''Source: APS Report: Feasibility of DAC with Chemicals (2011)
-
14
Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox
Real systems = more energy than thermodynamic minimum Second law efficiency: n = Wmin / Wreal
Depending on technology, concentration, purity, etc. work is required to regenerate tech,
compress CO2, etc.
ACTUAL work depends on unit operations / extent of
efficiencies.
-
15
Image courtesy RTI International
State of the Art: Amine Capture
-
How its done today: amine solvents
16 Image credits: RTI International, NETL
mass transfer, kinetics lower CAPEX
.: 2 mole amine / mol CO2
but, watch dHabs
CO2 pressure with minimal heat lower compression load lower parasitic steam use
-
Costs of CCUS
17
Transport Capture Storage Compression
80% Capital Cost
Energy required for CO2 separation, in parasitic load %
Herzog, et al., Advanced Post-Combustion CO2 Capture, Clean Air Task Force (2009)
-
Ideal CO2 Capture Material
18
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rat
e C
onst
ant (
M-1
s-1
)
Heat of Reaction (kJ/mol)
OH-
MEA
DEA
Piperazine
High Reaction Rate
Moderate Binding Energy
Ideal Material
Source: APS Report: Feasibility of DAC with Chemicals (2011)
-
FOA-1 & IMPACCT: Categories and Projects
19
Membranes Porifera Carbon nanotube membrane $1.2M
United Technologies Research Center
Facilitated transport w/ synthetic catalyst $1.9M
University of Kentucky Solvent/membrane hybrid process $2M
Georgia Tech MOF/polymer composite membranes $1M
University of Colorado Gelled ionic liquid-based membranes $3.9M
Sorbents Lehigh University Electric field desorption $0.5M
Texas A&M Stimuli-responsive MOFs $1M
MIT Electrochemical sorbent regeneration $1M
LBNL High-throughput MOF discovery $3.9M
ORNL Ionic liquids on hollow fiber support $0.8M
-
New Types of Membranes
20
New chemistries: gelled ionic liquids
Ultra-thin, defect-free layers
Flue gas from coal plant CO2
CO2 N2 N2 N2 CO2 Clean gas out
CO2 out
Membrane
-
Towards 10,000 GPU with high selec9vity
21
-
High-Throughput Adsorbent Discovery!Selectivity!
Sample Number"
0.15
bar
CO 2
capa
city (
mm
ol/g)
"
50 C"
Capacity!
H2NHNH2N
NH2
H2NN N
N
NH
HN
H2NHN
NH2
NNH2H2N
H2N
NH
HN
Rapid adsorbent discovery via high-throughput variation of metal-organic framework components" Alkylamine functionality endows metal-organic frameworks with high capacity, selectivity, and H2O tolerance"
-
Amine-grafted metal-organic frameworks reduce the amount of energy required to separate CO2" Fast kinetics and unusual adsorption process allow for rapid cycling with a 100 C adsorption temperature"
Frameworks with Appended Alkylamines!
MEA Baseline!
mmen-Mg2(dobpdc)!
Isobaric CO2 Adsorption!
High-temperature Cycling! Regeneration Energy!
Isothermal CO2 Adsorption!
25 C "40 C"50 C"75 C"
-
FOA-1 & IMPACCT: Categories and Projects
24
Solvents / Catalysts Nalco pH-swing process $1.7M
Codexis Direct evolution of enzymes $4.6M
LLNL Enzyme analogues and encapsulation $3.6M
Columbia University Catalytic enhancement of silicate weathering $1.3M
RTI Non-aqueous solvents $2.5M
Phase Change GE Global Research Liquid to solid phase change materials $3.7M
Notre Dame University Phase changing ionic liquids $2.6M
Alliant Tech Systems Supersonic capture duct $2.7M Sustainable Energy Solutions
Cryogenic process $5.3M
Chemical Looping Ohio State University Syngas looping process $7.1M
-
Cryogenic / phase change processes
25
AlternaBve route: take advantage of CO2s physical properBes (based on temperature and pressure) to separate out as solid SBll requires energy
Can avoid direct contact chemical processes
Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox
-
Supersonic Duct for CO2 Separa9on
26
Supersonic duct
-
Cryogenic Carbon Capture
-
Electrochemical Separa9on (ASU OPEN 2012)
-
ARPA-E Examples in Carbon Dioxide U9liza9on
29
-
A Few Words on CO2 U9liza9on
30
UBlizaBon for chemicals is a daunBng task Worldwide, emissions from coal = 13 gt/yr, petrol = 11 gt/yr, gas = 6 gt/yr Top 5 chemicals would miBgate 2.5% of worldwide CO2 generated Chemical World (Mt) Market Size Sulfuric Acid 199.9 Nitrogen 139.6 Ethylene 112.6 Oxygen 100 Lime 283
Geologic formation Worldwide storage capacity (Gt CO2)
Deep saline aquifers 1,000-10,000 * Depleted oil/gas fields 200-900 Unmineable coal beds 100-300
Source: Carbon Capture, Jennifer Wilcox
-
31