article level metrics
DESCRIPTION
Article Level Metrics. Cameron Neylon – ALM13 – San Francisco. @ cneylon – [email protected] - http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/13/julia-gillard-labor-purpose-future. The purpose of power is to shift the consensus…. Early majority. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Article Level Metrics
Cameron Neylon – ALM13 – San Francisco@cneylon – [email protected] - http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X
1
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/13/julia-gillard-labor-purpose-future
The purpose of power is to shift the
consensus…
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
LaggardsPeak of inflated expectations
Valley of negativity
Plateau of productivity
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards• Excitement• Potential• Risk• Disruption• Change
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards• Functionality• Reliability• Ease of use• Compatibility
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Enthusiasts
Early majority Late majority
Laggards
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
Alt Metrics
Alt Metrics
Level MetricsArticle
MetricsCommunicationResearch
MetricsCommunicationResearch
MetricsCommunicationResearchIndicators
MetricsAlt
CommunicationResearchIndicators
CommunicationMetricsResearch
Indicators Alt
CommunicationMetricsResearch
Indicators AltInfluence
CRII
CRIInfluence
CRIInfluence
What are we measuring?
What does it mean?
Who is being left out?
29
“More research is needed”
30
31
Do we need a theory of change?
CRIndicatorsI
CRIndicatorsI
Qualitative/quantitative?
Narrative?
altmetric.com
What’s the missing audience for these South African
papers?
...here’s one...
Not very high views
Not an obvious outlier...
...but interesting interactions...
...driven by this person...
...who I can talk to.
This. Is Impact.
CommunicationResearchII
CommunicationResearchII
Non-traditional outputs…
“Dark social”
CommunicationRII
CommunicationRII
Collaboration…competition
Community
Infrastructure
53
Consensus
Consensus as a collective action problem
Consensus as a collective action problem
Consensus as a collective action problem
Consensus as a collective action problem
Consensus as a collective action problem
Consensus as a collective action problem
Consensus as a collective action problem
Consensus as a collective action problem
• Policy• Narrative and
messaging• Consistency• Functionality• Interoperability
62
Consensus