artificial lift utilizing ct as a hollow sucker · pdf fileartificial lift utilizing ct as a...

Download Artificial Lift Utilizing CT as a Hollow Sucker  · PDF fileArtificial Lift Utilizing CT as a Hollow Sucker Rod ... Sucker Rod Pumps Anchor ... 0.04 0.03 0.02 Acceptable

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: trankhanh

Post on 06-Feb-2018

240 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • TT99-84 1

    Artificial Lift Utilizing CT as a Hollow Sucker Rod

    Humberto F. Leniek

    COIL TUBING AMERICAS

    Dr. William C. Maurer

    MAURER ENGINEERING INC.

    Engineering Inc.

  • TT99-84 2

    Stekoll Slimhole Pumping System (1960)

    Flow Line

    Rubber Hose

    1 Tee

    Clamp

    Polished Rod Liner

    2 7/8 Casing

    1 EUE Pumping String

    Traveling Barrel Insert Pump

    Slip-Type Hold-Down with Rubber Removed Screen

    Blind Cage

    Gas Vent

    Conventional Stuffing Box

  • TT99-84 3

    Stekoll Field Well (1960)

  • TT99-84 4

    STEKOLL Field Experience (1960)

    Over 1,000 Wells

    3,000 to 5,000 Foot Wells

    1 EUE Tubing (Hollow Sucker Rod)

    2-1/2 & 2-7/8 Inch Casing

    70 BOPD

    40 to 50% Reduction in Tubular Costs

    17% Overall Cost Savings

  • TT99-84 5

    STEKOLL Slimhole Wells (1960)

    Bolton Field, Kansas (1,000 ft) - 1,000 Wells

    Corsicana, Texas (1,200 ft) - 300 Wells

    Panhandle, Texas (3,000 ft) - 20 Wells

    Canada (5,000 ft) - 15 Wells

  • TT99-84 6

    STEKOLL Slimhole Operations (2-7/8)

    Drilling & Logging

    Perforating & Squeeze Cementing

    Acidizing & Fracturing

    Fishing & Washovers

    Sand Bailing

    Dual Completions

  • TT99-84 7

    Hollow Sucker Rod Advantage

    The hollow sucker rod combines the function of the sucker rod and the tubing, so it is no longer necessary to pull both sucker rods and tubing when working over wells.

    STEKOLL, 1960

  • TT99-84 8

    STEKOLL System Limitations (1960)

    Limited Slimhole Logging Tools

    Workover Concerns

    Tubing Failures

    Resistance to Slimholes

    Resistance to New Technology

  • TT99-84 9

    Leniek Pumping System (1999)

    Production Line

    1-1/2 Hydraulic Hose

    Clamp

    Hollow Polish Rod

    2-7/8 or 3-1/2 Casing (CT or Tubing)

    1-1/2 Coiled Tubing

    Hollow Rod Pump

    Anchor Screen

    Gas Vent

    Stuffing Box

  • TT99-84 10

    Leniek CT Pumping System

    Conventional Surface Equipment

    1,000 to 5,000 Feet

    2-7/8 or 3-1/2 Casing (CT or Tubing)

    1-1/2 CT (Hollow Sucker Rod)

    Hollow Polish Rod

    Hollow Rod Pump

  • TT99-84 11

    Leniek Surface Equipment

    (1999)

    Lubricated Stuffing Box

    Hollow Polish Rod

    Dynamometer Holder

    Bridel

    Polish Rod Clamp

    1-1/2 Hydraulic Hose

    Production Line

    U Tube

    Hydraulic Connector

  • TT99-84 12

    Hollow Rod Pump

    Screen

    Anchor Perforations

    1-1/2 Coiled Tubing

    2-7/8 or 3-1/2 Casing (CT or Tubing)

    Gas Gas

    Oil

    Oil

    Leniek Bottomhole Assembly

  • TT99-84 13

    Coiled Tubing

    Hollow Pull Rod

    Pump Plunger

    Traveling Valve

    Standing Valve

    Hollow Rod Conventional

    Pump Barrel

    Pump Barrel

    Pull Rod

    Tubing

    Pump Plunger

    Traveling Valve

    Conventional Seating Nipple

    Standing Valve

    Pump Barrel

    Sucker Rod Pumps

    Anchor

    Tubing

  • TT99-84 14

    Leniek System Advantages

    Reduce Well Construction Cost 50 Percent

    Eliminates Tubing Thread Failures

    Eliminates Tubing Anchors

    Reduce Lifting Costs

    Reduce Paraffin Problems

    Reduce Casing Wear

    Treat Wells Through CT

    Eliminate Rod Failures

    Allows Ultraslim Holes

  • TT99-84 15

    Initial Concerns

    CT Fatigue Failures

    CT Buckling

    CT Wear

    Casing Wear

  • TT99-84 16

    Argentina YPF Test (1998-1999)

    San Jorge Basin

    2,600 Foot Well

    60 BPD

    2-7/8 Casing (Tubing)

    1-1/2 CT

    13 Months (No Failures)

  • TT99-84 17

    YPF Test

  • TT99-84 18

    YPF Test

  • TT99-84 19

    YPF Test

  • TT99-84 20

  • TT99-84 21

    Project Name: Well Name: CT OD (in): CT Wall Thickness (in): Casing Pipe OD (in): Casing Pipe Weight (lb/ft): CT Yield Strength (psi): CT Weld Reduction Factor: Stress Concentration Factor: Fatigue Strength Coefficient: Pumping Fluid Density (ppg): CT Job Corrosion Factor: Stroke Rate (stk/min): Pumping Stroke Length (in): CT Length (ft):

    CTPS XYZ

    1.500 0.1340 3.500 9.380

    100000 1 1

    125000 8.33

    1 6 74

    6000

    Coiled Tubing Pumping Fatigue Model CT Length (ft)

    1000 1207 1414 1621 1828 2034 2241 2448 2655 2862 3069 3276 3483 3690 3897 4103 4310 4517 4724 4931 5138 5345 5552 5759 5966 6172 6379 6586 6793 7000

    Years to Failure

    >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >20 >10 7.61 4.64 2.87

    Acceptable

  • TT99-84 22

    CT Fatigue Life vs Stroke Rate

  • TT99-84 23

    Leniek Potential Applications

    Marginal Oilfields

    Shallow Wells

    Low Production Wells (

  • TT99-84 24

    Leniek Marketing Options

    Start Service Company

    Form Alliances with Service Companies

    License Patent Rights to Service Company

    Sell Territorial Rights to Operators

    Form Partnership With Major Independent

    Drill Slimholes Free For Oil Participation

    Purchase Shallow Fields and Become Operator

  • TT99-84 25

  • TT99-84 26

    Installation & Workover Requirements

    CT Rig

    New CT

    Good Supervision

  • TT99-84 27

    Future Requirements

    CT Centralizers

    Low Cost CT Pulling Units

    Trained Personnel

    Industry Acceptance

    Service Company Supplier

  • TT99-84 28

    Project Name: Well Name: CT OD (in): CT Wall Thickness (in): Casing Pipe OD (in): Casing Pipe Weight (lb/ft): CT Yield Strength (psi): CT Weld Reduction Factor: Stress Concentration Factor: Fatigue Strength Coefficient: Pumping Fluid Density (ppg): CT Job Corrosion Factor: Stroke Rate (stk/min): Pumping Stroke Length (in): CT Length (ft):

    CTPS XYZ

    1.500 0.1340 2.875 5.059 80000

    1 1

    105000 8.33

    1 6 74

    4000

    Coiled Tubing Pumping Fatigue Model CT Length (ft)

    1000 1207 1414 1621 1828 2034 2241 2448 2655 2862 3069 3276 3483 3690 3897 4103 4310 4517 4724 4931 5138 5345 5552 5759 5966 6172 6379 6586 6793 7000

    Years to Failure

    >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >20 >10 6.66 3.82 2.25 1.35 0.83 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.14 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02

    Acceptable

  • TT99-84 29

    Project Name: Well Name: CT OD (in): CT Wall Thickness (in): Casing Pipe OD (in): Casing Pipe Weight (lb/ft): CT Yield Strength (psi): CT Weld Reduction Factor: Stress Concentration Factor: Fatigue Strength Coefficient: Pumping Fluid Density (ppg): CT Job Corrosion Factor: Stroke Rate (stk/min): Pumping Stroke Length (in): CT Length (ft):

    CTPS XYZ

    1.500 0.1340 3.500 9.380 80000

    1 1

    105000 8.33

    1 6 74

    4000

    Coiled Tubing Pumping Fatigue Model CT Length (ft)

    1000 1207 1414 1621 1828 2034 2241 2448 2655 2862 3069 3276 3483 3690 3897 4103 4310 4517 4724 4931 5138 5345 5552 5759 5966 6172 6379 6586 6793 7000

    Years to Failure

    >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >10 8.55 4.48 2.43 1.35 0.78 0.46 0.27 0.17 0.11 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00

    Unacceptable

  • TT99-84 30

    Project Name: Well Name: CT OD (in): CT Wall Thickness (in): Casing Pipe OD (in): Casing Pipe Weight (lb/ft): CT Yield Strength (psi): CT Weld Reduction Factor: Stress Concentration Factor: Fatigue Strength Coefficient: Pumping Fluid Density (ppg): CT Job Corrosion Factor: Stroke Rate (stk/min): Pumping Stroke Length (in): CT Length (ft):

    CTPS XYZ

    1.500 0.1340 3.500 9.380 90000

    1 1

    115000 8.33

    1 6 74

    4000

    Coiled Tubing Pumping Fatigue Model CT Length (ft)

    1000 1207 1414 1621 1828 2034 2241 2448 2655 2862 3069 3276 3483 3690 3897 4103 4310 4517 4724 4931 5138 5345 5552 5759 5966 6172 6379 6586 6793 7000

    Years to Failure

    >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >20 >10 8.53 4.88 2.85 1.70 1.03 0.64 0.40 0.26 0.17 0.11 0.07

    Acceptable

  • TT99-84 31

    Project Name: Well Name: CT OD (in): CT Wall Thickness (in): Casing Pipe OD (in): Casing Pipe Weight (lb/ft): CT Yield Strength (psi): CT Weld Reduction Factor: Stress Concentration Factor: Fatigue Strength Coefficient: Pumping Fluid Density (ppg): CT Job Corrosion Factor: Stroke Rate (stk/min): Pumping Stroke Length (in): CT Length (ft):

    CTPS XYZ

    1.750 0.1560 5.500 14.500 100000

    1 1

    125000 8.33

    1 4 74

    6000

    Coiled Tubing Pumping Fatigue Model CT Length (ft)

    1000 1207 1414 1621 1828 2034 2241 2448 2655 2862 3069 3276 3483 3690 3897 4103 4310 4517 4724 4931 5138 5345 5552 5759 5966 6172 6379 6586 6793 7000

    Years to Failure

    >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >10 7.70 3.88 2.01 1.07 0.58 0.33 0.19 0.11 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.01

    Unacceptable

  • TT99-84 32

    Project Name: Well Name: CT OD (in): CT Wall Thicknes