asbestos and lead-based paint assessment report€¦ · advanced solutions group (asg) was retained...

ASBESTOS ANDLEAD-BASED PAINTASSESSMENT REPORT

US Army Corps of EngineersSouth Pacific Division Laboratory25 Liberty Ship WaySausalito, California 94965

December 1, 2004

Project No.: U04-2732 / Client No. ASGI001

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY REPORT

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERSSOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION LABORATORY

25 LIBERTY SHIP WAYSAUSALITO, CALIFORNIA 94965

PROJECT NO.: U04-2732

DECEMBER 1, 2004

Prepared for:

Veterans Administration HospitalSan Francisco, California

Prepared by:

Advanced Solutions Group, LLC1205 West Flint Meadow Drive, #3

P.O. Box 125Kaysville, Utah 84037

(801) 444-0029

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................1

2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................3

3.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL .................................................................4

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT ................................................................................................7

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................10

6.0 OPINIONS OF COST.................................................................................................12

7.0 STANDARD OF CARE.............................................................................................14

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Sample Location DrawingsAppendix B: Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody FormsAppendix C: Photographs

USACOE – S. Pacific Division Laboratory – Sausalito, California Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey – Project No. U04-2732Page 1 December 1, 2004

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Advanced Solutions Group (ASG) was retained to conduct an inspection for asbestos-containingmaterials (ACM) and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) at the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE)South Pacific Division Laboratory Building located at 25 Liberty Ship Way, Sausalito, MarinCounty, California 94965

The purpose of this study was to identify suspect ACM and suspect LBP surfaces at the subjectbuilding. The results of our inspection identified the following:

ACM (asbestos above 1% or PACM):• Exterior transite siding (approximately 30,000 square feet (2 layers) – damaged and non-

friable)• Transite pipe – PACM (approximately 50 linear feet – damaged and non-friable)• 9”x9” brown and green floor tile and mastic (approximately 500 square feet – damaged

and non-friable)• Transite sheeting - PACM (five (5) 8’x10’ sheets – undamaged and non-friable)• Black wall tar (approximately 2,000 square feet – undamaged and non-friable)• Transite ceiling panels – PACM (approximately 100 square feet –undamaged and non-

friable)

LBP (lead above 5,000 parts per million - ppm):• Gray interior walls (peeling)• White interior walls and ceilings (peeling)• Yellow exterior trim (peeling)• White exterior window sills (peeling)

Recommendations

• A California licensed asbestos abatement contractor should abate ACM which may becomefriable during renovation or demolition. The owner should submit completed Notificationsfor Asbestos Abatement or Demolition to the appropriate regulatory agencies. The ownershould maintain an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program for ACM remaining in thefacility. A California licensed asbestos consultant should conduct abatement specifications,on-site management, and air sampling.


• The damaged (peeling) LBP surfaces and associated debris, should be abated by aqualified LBP abatement contractor, including associated debris. In addition, a qualifiedLBP consultant should prepare abatement specifications and conduct air and wipesampling. Also, these LBP surfaces should be implemented into a Lead Paint O&MProgram. Compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)regulations, which affect the disposal of LBP, should be followed when LBP surfaces areabated. In addition, compliance with Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) leadregulations, as outlined in 29 CFR 1926.62 and 29 CFR 1910.1025, are applicable whendisturbing surfaces containing detectable levels of lead.

Opinions of Cost

Based upon the ACMs, PACMs, and LBP identified at the site, we are providing these opinionsof cost:

ACM Estimate $118,650 – 190,250 LBP Estimate $111,000 – 206,000 Total Estimate $184,650 – 321,250


2.0 INTRODUCTION

On October 26, 2004, Mr. Kevin Orr, California Asbestos Inspector and EPA Accredited leadPaint Inspector/Risk Assessor, conducted the asbestos and lead paint assessment of the subjectsite. Mr. Terry Bleckner, CIH, and AHERA Asbestos Inspector assisted Mr. Orr in thisinvestigation. As the building is unoccupied, Mr. Orr conducted the inspection without anescort.

The purpose of our investigation was to identify suspect ACM and LBP present at the subjectsite. The project building is for renovation or demolition and is in the process of a financialtransaction.

The project was conducted in accordance with the Scope of Work defined by the Department ofVeteran Affairs Medical Center, Project No. 662-04-118, September 2004.

The following scope of work was conducted for this project:• A California/AHERA Accredited Asbestos Inspector collected bulk samples for suspect

asbestos-containing material (ACM).• A Lead Paint Inspector tested interior and exterior painted surfaces.• Analysis of the bulk asbestos samples via polarized light microscopy (PLM) was

conducted by a NVLAP accredited laboratory.• Analysis of the bulk LBP samples via atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) by an

Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP) accredited laboratory.• Issuance of this report, containing the following:

drawings of the building showing ACM and LBP sampling locations findings and recommendations opinions of cost for abatement report to be reviewed by our Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH).

The subject building is a two-story unoccupied building, which was constructed in the late-1940s. The building was originally occupied by the US Army Corps of Engineers SouthPacific Division Laboratory. The building has been vacant since 1997 and contains a total ofapproximately 37,800 square feet.


3.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

The asbestos survey was conducted on October 26, 2004 by California licensed asbestosinspector Mr. Kevin Orr and AHERA Inspector Mr. Terry Bleckner. A total of 42 bulk samplesof friable and non-friable suspect ACM were collected in a random and unbiased manner.

The samples were analyzed by NCG Laboratories in Muncie, Indiana. NCG is a NationalVoluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) lab which uses polarized lightmicrocopy (PLM) to analyze the bulk samples.

3.1 ACM Findings

The following materials were determined to contain asbestos over 1%:

Table 1Positive ACM

SampleNo.

Material Location Condition Friability Approx.Quantity

324-1-A,B,C

Exterior transitesiding

Throughout buildingexterior

Damaged Non-Friable 30,000 SF(2 layers)

311-10-A,B,C

9”x9” brown or greenfloor tile/mastic

Level 1 – southwestoffices

Damaged Non-Friable 500 SF

403-16-A,B,C

Black tar on wall Level 1 coolers Undamaged Non-Friable 2,000 SF

SF = square feet

The following materials were not sampled; however, they are presumed ACM (PACM) andshould be treated as ACMs unless sampling proves otherwise:

Table 2Presumed ACM (PACM)

SampleNo.


324-3 Transite pipe (12”diameter)

Boiler room Damaged Non-Friable 50 LF

324-15 Transite sheeting Level 1 – east side Undamaged Non-friable 5 8’x10’sheets

324-17 Transite ceiling panels Level 2 – storage Undamaged Non-friable 100 SF


roomLF = linear feet

The following materials did not contain asbestos over 1%:

Table 3Negative ACM

SampleNo.


310-2-A,B,C-

12”x12” white floortile/mastic

Level 2 hallway andlaboratory

Damaged Non-Friable 3,500 SF

237-4-A,B,C

Boiler insulation Level 1 – boilerroom

Undamaged Non-Friable 200 SF

0-5-A,B,C

Boiler brick Level 1 – boilerroom

Undamaged Non-Friable 50 SF

313-6-A,B,C

Gray sheet flooring Level 2 – southeastoffices

Undamaged Non-Friable 1,200 SF

305-7-A,B,C

Sheet rock / tapingcompound

Throughout building Damaged Non-Friable 50,000 SF

302-8-A,B,C

2’x’2 ceiling tiles Level 2 – southwestoffices & laboratory

Damaged Friable 3,000 SF

313-9-A,B,C

Beige sheet flooring Level 2 – westoffices

Undamaged Non-Friable 1,500 SF

399-11-A,B,C

Roofing felt, flashing,and mastic

Roof surface Undamaged Non-Friable 20,000 SF

234-12-A,B,C

White duct tape Mezzanine ducts Undamaged Non-Friable 100 LF

303-13-A,B,C

2’x4’ ceiling tiles Level 2 – westoffices

Damaged Friable 1,000 SF

399-14-A,B,C

Ducting coveringmastic / mud

Mezzanine ducts Undamaged Non-Friable 500 LF

SF = square feet

3.2 ACM Discussion

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Emission Standard for Hazardous AirPollutants (NESHAP) requires removal of regulated friable ACM prior to demolition. EPA alsorequires the removal of regulated non-friable ACM that may become friable during renovation.This also may include ACMs that may become friable or produce visible dust duringrenovation/demolition.


EPA and OSHA define any building material which contains greater than one percentasbestos to be asbestos-containing material.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) construction and generalindustry standards also regulate ACM during removal and maintenance activities. In 1995,OSHA adopted new asbestos regulations that, for the first time, may extend to manypreviously unregulated commercial and industrial buildings. The regulations lower thepermissible asbestos exposure level in the workplace. They also make a number of technicalchanges both in the way various regulated activities are classified and in the practices requiredwhen asbestos is used, removed, managed, or disturbed. The biggest change, however, is toafford regulatory protection to more workers in more workplaces.

Also, compliance with the State of California asbestos rules, as discussed in California Code ofRegulations (CCR) 8 and CCR 17 are required, including using a California licensed asbestosabatement contractor.


4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT

The LBP survey was conducted on October 26, 2004 by USEPA Accredited Lead Paintinspector Mr. Kevin Orr. We conducted bulk sampling of the suspect interior and exterior LBPsurfaces. Homogeneous surfaces were tested at the facility. The condition of the paintedsurfaces was also noted.

The samples were analyzed by EMC Laboratories, in Phoenix, Arizona using AtomicAbsorption Spectrometry (AAS). EMC is a National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program(NLLAP) accredited laboratory.

The following tables outline the painted components that were screened during this investigation.Lead over the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) abatement “action level” of 5,000 partsper million (ppm).

4.1 LBP Findings

The following surfaces were found to contain lead above 0.5 percent by weight (5,000 partsper million - ppm):

Table 4 Lead Painted Surfaces over 5,000 ppm

Sample No. Color/Substrate/Component Condition Lead

Concentration

VA-L-1 Gray wood interior walls (wood, CMU,sheet rock)

Peeling 13,940 ppm

VA-L-2 White wood ceiling, walls, columns Peeling 6,260 ppm

VA-L-3 Yellow exterior trim (windows sills, wood,transite panels)

Peeling 196,100 ppm

VA-L-4 White exterior wood window sills Peeling 135,400 ppm


The following surfaces were not found to contain lead above 0.5 percent by weight or 5,000ppm:

Table 5 Lead Painted Surfaces less than 5,000 ppm

Sample No. Color/Substrate/Component Condition Lead

Concentration

VA-L-5 Dark green interior walls and window sills(sheet rock and wood)

Peeling 3,620 ppm

VA-L-6 Light green interior walls (sheet rock andwood)

Peeling 1,340 ppm

VA-L-7 Beige interior walls (wood and sheet rock) Peeling 2,700 ppm

VA-L-8 White debris – west side on floor Debris 4,490 ppm

VA-L-9 Yellow concrete floor Peeling 4,480 ppm

VA-L-10 Silver metal and concrete walls Undamaged 260 ppm

VA-L-11 Brown wood floor Peeling 3,330 ppm

4.2 LBP Discussion

The U.S. Department of housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for theEvaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in housing (HUD Guidelines), Chapter7: Lead-Based Paint Inspection, 1997 Revision, were generally followed for this limitedsurvey, with modifications appropriate for only sampling visually deteriorated surfaces.

HUD defines “lead-based paint” as any coating that has a lead concentration of 1.0 milligram oflead per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2 ) or greater, or if the lead concentration is greater than0.5% by weight (5,000 ppm). The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) currentlyconsiders paint to be lead-containing if the concentration of lead exceeds 600 ppm (0.06% byweight). In 1978, the CPSC banned the sale of lead-based paint to consumers, and banned itsapplication in areas where consumers have direct access to painted surfaces. Both the CPSC andHUD definitions of lead-containing paint are aimed at protecting the general population fromexposure to lead in the residential setting. By contrast, the mission of the Occupational Safetyand Health Administration (OSHA) with respect to lead-containing paint, is to protect workers


during construction activities that may generate elevated airborne lead concentrations. OSHAstates that construction work (including renovation, maintenance, and demolition) carried-out onstructures coated with paint have lead concentrations lower than the HUD or CPSC can stillresult in airborne lead concentrations in excess of regulatory limits. For this reason, OSHA hasnot defined lead-containing paint, but states that paint having any measurable level of lead maypose a substantial exposure hazard during construction work, depending upon the workperformed.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has regulations pertaining to lead,as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1025 (Construction Industry) and 29 CFR 1926.62 (GeneralIndustry).


5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of our inspection identified the following:

ACM (asbestos above 1% or PACM):• Exterior transite siding (approximately 30,000 square feet (2 layers)– damaged and non-

friable)• Transite pipe – PACM (approximately 50 linear feet – damaged and non-friable)• 9”x9” brown and green floor tile and mastic (approximately 500 square feet – damaged

and non-friable)• Transite sheeting - PACM (five (5) 8’x10’ sheets – undamaged and non-friable)• Black wall tar (approximately 2,000 square feet – undamaged and non-friable)• Transite ceiling panels – PACM (approximately 100 square feet –undamaged and non-

friable)

LBP (lead above 5,000 parts per million - ppm):• Gray interior walls (peeling)• White interior walls and ceilings (peeling)• Yellow exterior trim (peeling)• White exterior window sills (peeling)

Recommendations

• A California licensed asbestos abatement contractor should abate ACM which may becomefriable during renovation or demolition. The owner should submit completed Notificationsfor Asbestos Abatement or Demolition to the appropriate regulatory agencies. The ownershould maintain an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program for ACM remaining in thefacility. A California licensed asbestos consultant should conduct abatement specifications,on-site management, and air sampling.

• The damaged (peeling) identified LBP surfaces should be abated by a qualified LBPabatement contractor, including associated debris. In addition, a qualified LBP consultantshould prepare abatement specifications and conduct air and wipe sampling. Also, theseLBP surfaces should be implemented into a Lead Paint O&M Program. Compliance withthe Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations, which affect thedisposal of LBP, should be followed when LBP surfaces are abated. In addition,compliance with Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) lead regulations, as outlined in


29 CFR 1926.62 and 29 CFR 1910.1025, are applicable when disturbing surfacescontaining detectable levels of lead.


6.0 OPINIONS OF COST

Based upon the following ACMs and PACMs identified at the site, we are providing theseopinions of cost:

Table 6ACM Opinions of Cost

ASBESTOS ABATEMENTMaterial Approx. Quantity Unit Price For

RemovalCost for Removal

Exterior transite siding (2 layers) 30,000 SF $3.00 - 5.00 / SF $90,000 – 150,0009”x9” brown or green floortile/mastic

500 SF $2.00 - 3.00 / SF $1,000 – 1,500

Black tar on wall 2,000 SF $5.00 - 10.00 / SF $10,000 – 20,000Transite pipe (12” diameter) 50 LF $3.00 – 5.00 / LF $150 – 250Transite sheeting 5 8’x10’ sheets $3.00 – 5.00 / SF $1,200 – 2,000Transite ceiling panels 100 SF $3.00 – 5.00 / SF $300 - 500SUBTOTAL $102,650 – 174,250

ASBESTOS CONSULTINGOn-Site Management 30 Days $ 500.00 $ 13,500

Abatement Specifications andBidding Documents

LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500

SUB-TOTAL $ 16,000ACM TOTAL (Est.) $118,650 – 190,250


Based upon the following LBP identified over 5,000 ppm at the site, we are providing theseopinions of cost:

Table 7LBP Opinions of CostLBP ABATEMENT

Material Approx. Quantity Unit Price ForRemoval

Cost for Removal

Gray wood interior walls (wood,CMU, sheet rock)

20,000 SF $1.00 – 2.00 / SF $20,000 - $40,000

White wood ceiling, walls,columns

30,000 SF $1.00 – 2.00 / SF $30,000 - $60,000

Yellow exterior trim (windowssills, wood, transite panels)

30,000 SF $1.00 – 2.00 / SF $30,000 - $60,000

White exterior wood windowsills

150 windows $100 – 200 / EA $15,000 - $30,000

SUBTOTAL $95,000 – 190,000LBP CONSULTING

On-Site Management 30 Days $ 500.00 $ 13,500Abatement Specifications and

Bidding DocumentsLS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500

SUB-TOTAL $16,000LBP TOTAL (Est.) $111,000 – 206,000

Based upon the identified ACM and LBP, an overall estimate, including monitoring, is:

GRAND TOTAL (Est.) $184,650 – 321,250

These opinions of costs are estimates only, based upon our experience of having contractorsperform similar projects in scope and size. They do not, however, include the fees forcontractors bonding or insurance or replacement costs, such as re-flooring or re-painting. Also, alower estimate may be provided if the LBP removal methods include building demolition andremoval versus paint removal. The most accurate way to determine an estimated cost ofabatement is to have several licensed asbestos abatement contractors provide actual bids toperform the removal.


7.0 STANDARD OF CARE

This report is for the exclusive use of the Department of Veteran Affairs, Medical Center in SanFrancisco, California, its affiliates, designates and assignees, rating agencies, prospective bondholders and bond holders, and no other party shall have any right to rely on any service providedby us without prior written consent.

The services performed by ASG on this project have been conducted with the level of careand skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession practicing in the samelocality under similar budget and time constraints. No other warranty is expressed or implied.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at (801) 261-4616.

Prepared By:

Kevin C.Orr Terry Bleckner, CIHCalifornia Asbestos Inspector 02-3240, Lead Inspector Branch Manager

C:report/U04-2732-acmlbp

APPENDIX A

SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWINGS

NOVEMBER 2004

FIGURE 1A

ASBESTOS SURVEY – LEVEL 1USACOE – SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION LABORATORY25 LIBERTY SHIP WAYSAUSALITO, CA 94965 PROJECT NO. U04-2732

N

Engineer’s Offices

Boilerroom

SoilsClassification

CompressorRoom

LargeTriaxial

Freeze-ThawRoom

Men

St.

Compaction

CuringRoom

ColdRoom

Office

ConcreteHot Rm.

ConcreteCuring

Drying

Consolidation

Soil MoistRoom

DurabilityTesting

Repo &Drafting

SmallTriaxial

Cyclic Triaxial

office

Machine shop

Concrete laboratory

Permroom

SoilsStorage

AndSampling

HPU Rm

Concrete laboratory

TestingArea

office office

LEGENDACM wall mastic

324-1-A,B,C

403-16-C

403-16-A

324-15 (PACM)

305-7-B

305-7-A311-10-A,B,C

324-3 (PACM)237-4-A,B,C

0-5-A,B,C

403-16-B

ACM transiteACM flooring

NOVEMBER 2004

FIGURE 2A

ASBESTOS SURVEY – LEVEL 2USACOE – SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION LABORATORY25 LIBERTY SHIP WAYSAUSALITO, CA 94965 PROJECT NO. U04-2732

N

Comp.Gas

Storage(Rm. 203)

ChemicalAnalysis

RMO Office219

Women

Storage Platform

ConcreteMezz.

Comp.Room

BalanceRoom

Chem.St.

Office220

SpecialStudies #2

LunchRoom

FileSawSpecial

Studies #1(Rm. 202)

Men

Copy Rm.207

Chem Office206

Conf. Room

ConcreteLaboratoryUpper portion

of sample and storage

area

FacultyOffice

Director

SampleReceiving

(Room 218)

Mezzanine

Upper portion ofConcrete

Laboratory

hallw

ay


Laboratory

LEGENDACM transite

324-17 (PACM)

303-13-A,B,C

234-12-A,B,C399-14-A,B,C

399-11-A,B,C(ROOF) 313-9-A,B,C

305-7-C302-8-A,B,C

313-6-A,B,C

310-2-A,B,C

NOVEMBER 2004

FIGURE 1B

LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY – LEVEL 1USACOE – SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION LABORATORY25 LIBERTY SHIP WAYSAUSALITO, CA 94965 PROJECT NO. U04-2732

N

Engineer’s Offices

Boilerroom

SoilsClassification

CompressorRoom

LargeTriaxial

Freeze-ThawRoom

Men

St.

Compaction

CuringRoom

ColdRoom

Office

ConcreteHot Rm.

ConcreteCuring

Drying

Consolidation

Soil MoistRoom

DurabilityTesting

Repo &Drafting

SmallTriaxial

Cyclic Triaxial

office

Machine shop

Concrete laboratory

Permroom

SoilsStorage

AndSampling

HPU Rm

Concrete laboratory

TestingArea

office office

NOTES1 - lead paint located on gray surfaces and white surface throughout level 12 – lead paint located on white exterior window sills3 – lead paint located on yellow exterior trim

VA-L-01

305-7-B

VA-L-09

VA-L-04

VA-L-02

NOVEMBER 2004

FIGURE 2B

LEAD-BASED PAINT – LEVEL 2USACOE – SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION LABORATORY25 LIBERTY SHIP WAYSAUSALITO, CA 94965 PROJECT NO. U04-2732

N

Comp.Gas

Storage(Rm. 203)

ChemicalAnalysis

RMO Office219

Women

Storage Platform

ConcreteMezz.

Comp.Room

BalanceRoom

Chem.St.

Office220

SpecialStudies #2

LunchRoom

FileSawSpecial

Studies #1(Rm. 202)

Men

Copy Rm.207

Chem Office206

Conf. Room

ConcreteLaboratoryUpper portion

of sample and storage

area

FacultyOffice

Director

SampleReceiving

(Room 218)

Mezzanine


Laboratory

hallw

ay


Laboratory

NOTES

VA-L-03(EXTERIOR)

1 - lead paint located on gray surfaces and white surface throughout level 22 – lead paint located on white exterior window sills3 – lead paint located on yellow exterior trim

VA-L-05VA-L-06

VA-L-08

VA-L-07

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY RESULTS & CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS

Table 1: Material Identification InventoryNova Consulting Group, Inc.1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite #400Chaska, MN 55318

Client Number: ADVAN009 Building Name:Building Address:Login Number: 28678

Project Number: U04-2732 Client Name: Advanced Soltuions Group

Building Number:Survey Date: 10/26/04

NOTE: This report is sorted by Area, Location

LocationMat'lCode

Material Identification AsbestosContent Qty UnitSubcategory Description

Material Id#Subcat

AreaRoom Number

YES 15000Transite

1 Yellow Exterior Siding

Exterior 324 M SF

boiler exterior

ND 200Boiler Insulation

4 White - Grey Insulation

Level 1 - Boiler room 237 T SF

inside boiler

ND 50boiler brick

5 White - Grey Boiler Brick

Level 1 - Boiler room 0 T SF

NT 5Transite

15 Pacm Transite Sheets (4'x8')

Level 1 - east side 324 M EA

YES 5009x9 Floor Tile & Mastic

10 Brown/Tan/Green Tile And Mastic

Level 1 - SW engineers office 311 M SF

exterior - south wall

NT 50Transite

3 Pacm Pipe

level 1 boiler room 324 M LF

on walls

YES 2000Tar Paper

16 Tar Wrap And Sealer - Black

Level 1 coolers 403 M SF

level 2 offices and throughout

ND 50000Sheetrock & Taping Compound

7 White Sheetrock And Taping Compound

level 1 offices and throughout 305 M SF

level 2 - hallway

ND 1200Sheet Floor & Mastic

6 Grey Sheet Flooring

Level 2 - southeast offices 313 M SF

Computer Room

NT 100Transite

17 Pacm - Transite Ceiling

Level 2 - storage room 324 M SF

Level 2 - lab

ND 30002x2 Ceiling Tile

8 2x2 Ceiling Tiles

Level 2 - SW offices 302 M SF

ND 10002x4 Ceiling Tile

13 2x4 Ceiling Tiles

Level 2 - west offices 303 M SF

ND 1500Sheet Floor & Mastic

9 Beige Sheet Flooring

Level 2 - West offices 313 M SF

Level 1 men's room vestibule

ND 350012x12 Floor Tile & Mastic

2 Off-White Tile With Brown Mastic

Level 2 hallway and lab 310 M SF

on ducts

ND 500duct wrap

14 Covering Mud On Fiberglass Ducts

Mezzanine - west side 399 M LF

throughout roof surface

ND 20000roof mastic

11 Black Mastic And Asphalt Tiles

roof 399 M SF

ND 100Duct Insulation

12 White Duct Tape

West side - mezzanine 234 M LF

Page 1 of 1ND = None Detected NSMP = No Suspect Materials PresentNT = Not Tested NS = Not Suspect PRE = Presumed TR = Trace (<1%)© Nova Consulting Group, Inc.

C:\Documents and Settings\terrybleckner\My D

Table 2: Bulk Sample Analysis / Chain of CustodyNova Consulting Group, Inc.1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite #400Chaska, MN 55318




Sampled By: Date/Time:

Received By: Date/Time:Relinquished By: Date/Time:Turnaround Time: Due:

Received/Lab By: Date/Time:

Logged in By: Date/Time:Analyzed By: Date/Time:Client Notified By: Date/Time:

Kevin Orr / Terry Bleckner

10/26/2004

Std. 11/4/2004

Michael McWhorter 10/28/2004

Michael McWhorter 10/29/2004Andrew Koeling 11/4/2004Andrew Koeling 11/4/2004

Project Manager: Terry Bleckner Container Type: whirl-paksTotal # Samples: 45

10/26/04Survey Date(s):Analytical Method: Polarized Light Microscopy with Dispersion Staining (EPA/600/R-93/116, July 1993)

Note

Reporting Limit:Quality Control Blank: Glass Fiber from SRM 1866 1% AsbestosRoom Temp(C): 23

Page 1 of 8ND = None Detected NT = Not Tested TRACE = <1%Detection Limit = 1%

C:\Documents and Settings\terrybleckner\My Documents\LabResults\© NCG Laboratories





Location / Room#Mtl#-Sub-Ltr

Material Description Subcategory DescriptionAsbestos

FibersNon-Asbestos

FibersComments/

Nonfibrous MaterialArea

Sample Pos.Sample

Prep Friability

boiler brick White - Grey Boiler Brick ND 100% OtherLevel 1 - Boiler roominside boiler

0-5-A Crushed Non-Friable


0-5-B Crushed Non-Friable


0-5-C Crushed Non-Friable

Duct Insulation White Duct Tape ND 40% Cellulose 60% OtherWest side - mezzanine234-12-A Teased Friable

Duct Insulation White Duct Tape ND 40% Cellulose 60% OtherWest side - mezzanine234-12-B Teased Friable

Duct Insulation White Duct Tape ND 40% Cellulose 60% OtherWest side - mezzanine234-12-C Teased Friable

Boiler Insulation White - Grey Insulation ND 25% Cellulose 75% OtherLevel 1 - Boiler roomboiler exterior

237-4-A Friable


237-4-B Friable


237-4-C Friable

2x2 Ceiling Tile 2x2 Ceiling Tiles ND 65% Cellulose 25% Fibrous Glass

10% OtherTile Layer

Level 2 - SW officesLevel 2 - lab

302-8-A Teased Friable

2x2 Ceiling Tile 2x2 Ceiling Tiles ND 100% OtherPaint Layer





302-8-B Teased Friable


10% OtherTile Layer




10% OtherTile Layer


302-8-C Teased Friable









FibersNon-Asbestos

FibersComments/


Sample Pos.Sample

Prep Friability





Level 2 - west offices303-13-A Teased Friable


10% OtherTile Layer

Level 2 - west offices303-13-A Teased Friable


Level 2 - west offices303-13-B Teased Friable


10% OtherTile Layer

Level 2 - west offices303-13-B Teased Friable


Level 2 - west offices303-13-C Teased Friable


10% OtherTile Layer

Level 2 - west offices303-13-C Teased Friable

Sheetrock & Taping Compound White Sheetrock And Taping Compound

ND 10% Cellulose 90% OtherSheetrock Layer

level 1 offices and throughoutlevel 2 offices and throughout

305-7-A Crushed Friable


ND 100% OtherTaping Compound Layer


305-7-A Crushed Friable




305-7-B Crushed Friable




305-7-B Crushed Friable




305-7-C Crushed Friable




305-7-C Crushed Friable









FibersNon-Asbestos

FibersComments/


Sample Pos.Sample

Prep Friability

12x12 Floor Tile & Mastic Off-White Tile With Brown Mastic ND 100% OtherTile Layer

Level 2 hallway and labLevel 1 men's room vestibule

310-2-A Friable

12x12 Floor Tile & Mastic Off-White Tile With Brown Mastic NDMastic

5% Cellulose 95% OtherMastic Layer


310-2-A Friable



310-2-B Friable

12x12 Floor Tile & Mastic Off-White Tile With Brown Mastic NDMastic



310-2-B Friable


No Mastic Present


310-2-C Friable

9x9 Floor Tile & Mastic Brown/Tan/Green Tile And Mastic 3% Chrysotile 97% OtherTile Layer

Level 1 - SW engineers office311-10-A Friable

9x9 Floor Tile & Mastic Brown/Tan/Green Tile And Mastic 3% Chrysotile Mastic

97% OtherMastic Layer

Level 1 - SW engineers office311-10-A Friable


Level 1 - SW engineers office311-10-B Friable



Level 1 - SW engineers office311-10-B Friable


Level 1 - SW engineers office311-10-C Friable



Level 1 - SW engineers office311-10-C Friable

Sheet Floor & Mastic Grey Sheet Flooring NDMastic


Level 2 - southeast officeslevel 2 - hallway

313-6-A Friable

Sheet Floor & Mastic Grey Sheet Flooring ND 100% OtherVinyl Layer


313-6-A Friable









FibersNon-Asbestos

FibersComments/


Sample Pos.Sample

Prep Friability

Sheet Floor & Mastic Grey Sheet Flooring ND 35% Cellulose 65% OtherBacking Layer


313-6-A Friable



313-6-B Friable




313-6-B Friable



313-6-B Friable



313-6-C Friable



313-6-C Friable




313-6-C Friable

Sheet Floor & Mastic Beige Sheet Flooring ND 100% OtherVinyl Layer

Level 2 - West offices313-9-A Non-Friable

Sheet Floor & Mastic Beige Sheet Flooring ND 3% Cellulose 97% OtherBacking Layer


Sheet Floor & Mastic Beige Sheet Flooring NDMastic




Level 2 - West offices313-9-B Non-Friable














FibersNon-Asbestos

FibersComments/


Sample Pos.Sample

Prep Friability


Level 2 - West offices313-9-C Non-Friable






Transite Yellow Exterior Siding 15% Chrysotile 85% OtherExterior324-1-A Friable

Transite Yellow Exterior Siding 15% Chrysotile 85% OtherExterior324-1-B Friable

Transite Yellow Exterior Siding 15% Chrysotile 85% OtherExterior324-1-C

Transite Pacm Transite Sheets (4'x8') Not Tested Did Not ReceiveLevel 1 - east side324-15-A

Transite Pacm Transite Sheets (4'x8') Not Tested Did Not ReceiveLevel 1 - east side324-15-B

Transite Pacm Transite Sheets (4'x8') Not Tested Did Not ReceiveLevel 1 - east side324-15-C

Transite Pacm - Transite Ceiling Not Tested Did Not ReceiveLevel 2 - storage roomComputer Room

324-17-A


324-17-B


324-17-C

Transite Pacm Pipe Not Tested Did Not Receivelevel 1 boiler roomexterior - south wall

324-3-A


324-3-B


324-3-C









FibersNon-Asbestos

FibersComments/


Sample Pos.Sample

Prep Friability

roof mastic Black Mastic And Asphalt Tiles ND 5% Fibrous Glass 95% Otherroofthroughout roof surface

399-11-A Friable


399-11-B Friable


399-11-C Friable

duct wrap Covering Mud On Fiberglass Ducts ND 97% Fibrous Glass 3% OtherYellow Layer

Mezzanine - west sideon ducts


duct wrap Covering Mud On Fiberglass Ducts ND 90% Cellulose 10% OtherBacking Layer















Tar Paper Tar Wrap And Sealer - Black 20% Chrysotile 80% OtherPaint/Tar Layer

Level 1 coolerson walls

403-16-A Friable

Tar Paper Tar Wrap And Sealer - Black ND 95% Fibrous Glass 5% OtherBacking Layer


403-16-A Friable



403-16-B Friable



403-16-B Friable









FibersNon-Asbestos

FibersComments/


Sample Pos.Sample

Prep Friability



403-16-C Friable



403-16-C Friable



EMC LABS, INC.

9830 South 51st Street, Suite B-109 / PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85044 / 480-940-5294 or 800-362-3373 / FAX 480-893-1726 [email protected]

ANALYST: QA COORDINATOR: Jason Thompson Kurt Kettler

Page 1 of 1

LEAD (Pb) IN PAINT CHIP SAMPLES EMC SOP METHOD #L01/1 EPA SW-846 METHOD 7420

EMC LAB #: L27426 DATE RECEIVED: 10/28/04

REPORT DATE: 11/04/04 CLIENT: Nova Consulting

DATE OF ANALYSIS: 11/01/04

CLIENT ADDRESS: 5600 South 141 East #211 Murray, UT 84107

P.O. NO.: U04-2732

PROJECT NAME: VA-Savsolito, CA PROJECT NO.: U04-2732

EMC # L27426-

SAMPLE DATE /04

CLIENT SAMPLE #

DESCRIPTION

REPORTING LIMIT

(%Pb by weight)

%Pb BY WEIGHT

1 10/26 VA-L-1 Grey Wood Wall 0.010 1.394

2 10/26 VA-L-2 White Wood Ceiling 0.010 0.626

3 10/26 VA-L-3 Yellow Ext. Trim 0.100 19.61 ^

4 10/26 VA-L-4 White Wood Sills 0.100 13.54 ^

5 10/26 VA-L-5 Dk. Green Int. Walls 0.010 0.362

6 10/26 VA-L-6 Lt. Green Int. Walls 0.010 0.134

7 10/26 VA-L-7 Beige SR Wall 0.010 0.270

8 10/26 VA-L-8 White Debris 0.010 0.449

9 10/26 VA-L-9 Yellow Conc. Floor 0.010 0.448

10 10/26 VA-L-10 Silver Metal Wall 0.010 0.026

11 10/26 VA-L-11 Brown Wood Floor 0.010 0.333 ^ = Dilution Factor Changed * = Excessive Substrate May Bias Sample Results BRL = Below Reportable Limits This report applies to the standards or procedures identified and to the samples tested only. The test results are not necessarily indicative or representative of the qualities of the lot from which the sample was taken or of apparently identical or similar products, nor do they represent an ongoing quality assurance program unless so noted. Unless otherwise noted, all quality control analyses for the samples noted above were within acceptable limits. Blank correction is performed if the result for the blank is higher than the reporting limit. Where it is noted that a sample with excessive substrate was submitted for laboratory analysis, such analysis may be biased. The lead content of such sample may, in actuality, be greater than reported. EMC makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the analysis of samples noted to have been submitted with excessive substrate. Resampling is recommended in such situations to verify original laboratory results. These reports are for the exclusive use of the addressed client and are rendered upon the condition that they will not be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes over our signature or in connection with our name without special written permission. Samples not destroyed in testing are retained a maximum of sixty (60) days.

APPENDIX C

PHOTOGRAPHS

USACOE – South Pacific Division LaboratoryProject No. U04-2732 ACM & LBP Survey - Sausalito, CA

Photographed by TB October 26, 2004. - 1 -

Photo 1 – Subject Site Photo 2 – ACM transite siding (Sample 324-1)

Photo 3 – PACM transite pipes (Sample 324-3) Photo 4 – ACM 9”x9” floor tile/mastic (Sample 311-10)

Photo 5 – PACM transite sheets (Sample 324-15) Photo 6 – ACM tar/wall material (Sample 403-16)

USACOE – South Pacific Division LaboratoryProject No. U04-2732 ACM & LBP Survey - Sausalito, CA

Photographed by TB October 26, 2004. - 2 -

Photo 7 – PACM transite ceiling (Sample 324-17) Photo 8 – LBP gray wood wall (Sample VA-L-1)

Photo 9 – LBP white wood ceiling (Sample VA-L-2) Photo 10 – LBP yellow exterior trim (Sample VA-L-3)

Photo 11 – LBP white exterior window sills (SampleVA-L-4)