asep summit 2012 - balili apd presentation - design of bridges

49
6/8/2012 1 Design of Reinforced Concrete Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol Vol 2 By Alden Paul D. Balili, MSCE DLSU-M Outline Outline Overview Highlight of Changes per Chapter Does not include geotechnical provisions Who is this for? Who is this for? Aspiring Bridge Engineers Bridge Engineers Aspiring Bridge Engineer Bridge Engineers INTRODUCTION TO INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE DESIGN: BRIDGE DESIGN: SUPERSTRUCTURE PARTS SUPERSTRUCTURE PARTS Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

Upload: paul-marion-demapelis

Post on 06-Nov-2015

15 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Bridge Design

TRANSCRIPT

  • 6/8/2012

    1

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Bridges as per NSCP 2010 VolVol 22By Alden Paul D. Balili, MSCEDLSU-M

    OutlineOutline

    y Overviewy Highlight of Changes per Chaptery Does not include geotechnical provisions

    Who is this for?Who is this for?

    y Aspiring Bridge Engineersy Bridge Engineers

    Aspiring Bridge Engineer Bridge Engineers

    INTRODUCTION TO INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE DESIGN: BRIDGE DESIGN: SUPERSTRUCTURE PARTSSUPERSTRUCTURE PARTS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

  • 6/8/2012

    2

    Please Note:Please Note:

    y Longitudinal direction means in the direction parallel to traffic.y Transverse direction means in the direction

    perpendicular to traffic

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    Longitudinal

    Transverse

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y Superstructure Section

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    yWEARING SURFACE

    WearingSurface

  • 6/8/2012

    3

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    yWEARING SURFACE is the portion of the deck which resists traffic

    wear. Could be a separate layer of bituminous material,

    or Is integral with the deck, (additional thickness

    added to the deck)

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y DECK

    Deck

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y DECK Its main function is to distribute loads transversely

    along the bridge cross section. Usually integrated with the primary members The wearing surface and barriers are placed on top

    of this

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y PRIMARY MEMBERS

    PrimaryMembers

  • 6/8/2012

    4

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y PRIMARY MEMBERS Distributes loads longitudinally and are designed to

    resist flexure and shear from traffic loads. Otherwise known as stringers or girders.

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y SECONDARY MEMBERS

    SecondaryMembers

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y SECONDARY MEMBERS Bracing between primary members in the

    transverse direction. Helps distribute the loads between primary

    members. For prestressed concrete bridges, they are often

    called diaphragms. Diaphragms between the ends are called internal

    diaphragms. While Diaphragms at the ends are called external diaphragm.

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y TRAFFIC BARRIERS

    TrafficBarriers

  • 6/8/2012

    5

    SUPERSTRUCTURESUPERSTRUCTURE

    y TRAFFIC BARRIERSis a device which protects wayward vehicles

    from running over the bridge. when a pedestrian walkway is present

    protects pedestrians from wayward vehicles.

    INTRODUCTION TO INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE DESIGN: BRIDGE DESIGN: SUBSTRUCTURE PARTSSUBSTRUCTURE PARTS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

  • 6/8/2012

    6

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y PIER

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y PIER ..are structures which support the superstructure

    at intermediate points between the end supports. A pier which has multiple columns with a beam

    joining them on top is usually called a column bent.

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y CAP BEAM (note: column bent shown)

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y CAP BEAM ..the top beam in a bent which ties together the

    supporting columns or piles.

  • 6/8/2012

    7

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y Abutment

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y Abutment ..are earth-retaining structures which support the

    superstructure at the beginning and end of the bridge. Comes in a variety of forms

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y SHEAR KEY

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y SHEAR KEY ..a short element attached to the abutment or pier

    cap beam which prevents the superstructure from sliding transversely against lateral loads

  • 6/8/2012

    8

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y BEARINGS

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y BEARINGS .. are mechanical systems which transmit the

    vertical and horizontal loads of the superstructure to the substructure. This is usually composed of flexible material to

    accommodate movements of the superstructure and substructure.

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y PEDESTAL

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y PEDESTAL .. Is a short column under the bearings. Usual function is to provide a level surface and

    achieve the desired elevation for the bearing .

  • 6/8/2012

    9

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y STEM

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y STEM .. A cantilever wall providing protection from the

    earth especially if there is a roadway underneath the bridge (an underpass).

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y BACKWALL

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y BACKWALL .. An extension of the stem which serves as

    protection from the earth for the ends of the superstructure.

  • 6/8/2012

    10

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    yWINGWALL

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    yWINGWALL .. Is attached to the backwall. is designed to assist in confining the soil behind

    the abutment.

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y APPROACH SLAB

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y Note: Approach is the section of roadway before and after the structurey Approach Slab .. Is a slab located on the approaches and

    supported by the abutment used to prevent settlement of the approach pavement.

  • 6/8/2012

    11

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y FOOTING

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y Footing .. A component which transmits the loads from the

    substructure and superstructure to the soil or the piles underneath. A footing supported without piles and resting on

    soil is called a spread footing..A footing supported with piles is called a pile

    cap

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y PILES

    SUBSTRUCTURESUBSTRUCTURE

    y PILES .. Are used when the bearing capacity under a

    footing is incapable of carrying the gravity loads. .. Extend below to a stronger soil layer or the

    underlying rock layer to provide adequate support and to prevent settlement.There are different types of piles ranging from

    concrete to steel

  • 6/8/2012

    12

    INTRODUCTION TO INTRODUCTION TO NEW NEW NSCPNSCP 2010 2010 VOLVOL 2 2 CODECODE

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    IntroductionIntroduction

    y The new NSCP 2010 code adopts the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2007.y It should be noted that the latest

    AASHTO code is 2010. However, revisions from 2007 to 2010 are minimal.

    IntroductionIntroduction

    y The new NSCP 2010 code adopts the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2007.y It should be noted that the latest

    AASHTO code is 2010. However, revisions from 2007 to 2010 are minimal.

    Chapters adapted from Chapters adapted from AASHTO LRFD 2007AASHTO LRFD 2007

    AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE 2007 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

  • 6/8/2012

    13

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

  • 6/8/2012

    14

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads (Distribution Factors)4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete9. Prestressed Concrete10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel11. Aluminum Design12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    For decks of composite systems

  • 6/8/2012

    15

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design (Mononobe Okabe)

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 21. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure

    Interaction Systems18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction

    System19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads (Railing load provisions)4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings

    15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings

    20. Disc Bearings

    21. Seismic Design

    (Has a lot of new content regarding railings)

  • 6/8/2012

    16

    Where are they now?Where are they now?

    NSCP Vol 2 - 1997 NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    1. General Provisions

    2. General Features of Design

    3. Loads

    4. Foundations

    5. Retaining Walls

    6. Culverts

    7. Substructures

    8. Reinforced Concrete

    9. Prestressed Concrete

    10. Structural Steel

    11. Aluminum Design

    12. Soil-Corrugated Metal Structure Interaction Systems

    13. Timber Structures

    14. Elastomeric Bearings15. TFE Bearing Surface

    16. Steel Tunnel Liner Plates

    17. Soil Reinforced Concrete Structure Interaction Systems

    18. Soil-Thermoplastic Pipe Interaction System

    19. Pot Bearings20. Disc Bearings21. Seismic Design

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 01CHAPTER 01

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    Chapter 01 HighlightsChapter 01 Highlights

    y Description of the different design limit states Service Limit State Fatigue and Fracture Limit State Strength Limit State Extreme Event Limit States

    Chapter 01 HighlightsChapter 01 Highlights

    y Description of the different design limit states Service Limit Statex Restrictions on stress, deformation and crack width

    under regular service conditions.

    Fatigue and Fracture Limit State Strength Limit State Extreme Event Limit States

  • 6/8/2012

    17

    Chapter 01 HighlightsChapter 01 Highlights

    y Description of the different design limit states Service Limit State Fatigue and Fracture Limit Statex Restrictions on stress range as a result of a single

    design truck occurring at the number of expected stress range cycles. This is to prevent crack growth due to repetitive loading

    Strength Limit State Extreme Event Limit States

    Chapter 01 HighlightsChapter 01 Highlights

    y Description of the different design limit states Service Limit State Fatigue and Fracture Limit State Strength Limit Statex Strength and stability are provided to resist force

    combinations that the bridge is expected to experience.

    Extreme Event Limit States

    Chapter 01 HighlightsChapter 01 Highlights

    y Description of the different design limit states Service Limit State Fatigue and Fracture Limit State Strength Limit State Extreme Event Limit Statesx Ensures structural survival of a bridge during the

    following extreme events (Earthquake, floor, ship and vehicle collision)

    FYI: FatigueFYI: Fatigue

    yWhat is fatigue? Slow degradation of materials due to

    repetitive loading and resulting stress reversals. A good example is a paper clip bent back and

    forth till failure

    Bend up

    Bend down

    Repeat to failure!

  • 6/8/2012

    18

    FYI: FatigueFYI: Fatigue

    yWhat is fatigue? Hence, the term stress range is used to

    indicate the extreme stresses (+ or - ) a member goes through. Ex: Higher stress range is experienced, when a

    section undergoes both positive and negative moment!

    -

    +

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 02: GENERAL CHAPTER 02: GENERAL DESIGN FEATURESDESIGN FEATURES

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    Chapter 02Chapter 02

    y Generally, this chapter indicates required clearances and geometric requirements for bridges as specified by AASHTO.y Requirements for Hydrology analysis are

    also indicated.

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 03: LOADS CHAPTER 03: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORSAND LOAD FACTORS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

  • 6/8/2012

    19

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Things to be discussed Loads and Load Combinations The New Design Truck New Seismic Load Provisions Shrinkage, Creep and Temperature

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Load listPERMANENT LOADS TRANSIENT LOADS

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Load Combinations Strength Strength I Normal vehicular use w/o wind Strength II Special vehicle use w/o wind Strength III No vehicle use with wind

    velocity > 90 km/h Strength IV High dead load to live load ratio Strength V Normal vehicular use with wind

    = 90 km/h

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Load Combinations Strength

  • 6/8/2012

    20

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Load Combinations Extreme Event Extreme Event 1 Earthquake combination Extreme Event II Load combination

    considering the extreme effects of the following (vessel colission, extreme flood) with reduced live load.

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Load Combinations Extreme Event

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Load Combinations Service Service I Normal Bridge Operation w/ 90

    kph wind. Used for Reinforced Concrete Crack Control Service II Control of yielding of steel

    structures and slip of slip-critical connections Service III Crack control for prestressed

    concrete superstructures Service IV Crack control for prestressed

    columns/piles

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Load Combinations Service

  • 6/8/2012

    21

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Variable load factors. For certain combinations, variable factors are

    used to ensure that members have adequate strength for all possible conditions.

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Variable load factors.

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Example of Variable Load Factors

    1.25 DC +LL+WA+FR+EQ0.9 DC +LL+WA+FR+EQ

    Ex: Lower gravity loads might result in more conservative column design

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y The New Design Truck

    Subject to Dynamic Load Allowance (or impact factor)

  • 6/8/2012

    22

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y Lane Load = 9.3 kN/m distributed over 3m width

    Not subject to Dynamic Load Allowance (or impact factor)

    9.3 kN/m

    3m

    Bridges Bridges Standard Trucks LRFDStandard Trucks LRFD

    y Note that the new truck used by the latest LRFD code is called the HL 93. Note that the new code prescribes that truck and lane load are concurrenty HL-93 Standard Shown Below

    9.3 kN/m lane load

    Bridges Bridges Standard Trucks LRFDStandard Trucks LRFDy For HL93 a new truck for negative moment is

    also prescribed. The axle loads are 90% of that for the single trucky HL-93 for Negative moment and interior pier

    reactions Shown Below

    4300mm 4300mm15000mm MIN

    31.5 kN 130.5 kN 130.5 kN 31.5 kN 130.5 kN 130.5 kN

    9.3 kN/m lane load

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loadsy To take into account dynamic effects (aka the

    additional force due to vibration), Dynamic Load allowance (DLA) factor is added.y The dynamic factor to be used are shown

    below

    Note that the impact factor is now constant and not variable with the span.

  • 6/8/2012

    23

    Chapter 03 LoadsChapter 03 Loads

    y To apply the DLA, the wheel loads could be multiplied by (1+DLA Factor) prior to analysis

    Before DLA

    After DLA = 33%(Multiply original value by 1.33)

    46550 N 192850 N 192850 N

    Chapter 03 Loads Chapter 03 Loads -- EarthquakeEarthquake

    y In Chapter 3, the basic parameters are specified for EQ load computation. These are Acceleration Coefficient Importance Categories Site Effects Response Modification Factor

    Bridges : Earthquake loadsBridges : Earthquake loads

    y Earthquake Majority of the Philippines is classified as seismic zone 4

    (Acceleration Coefficient = 0.4) Earthquake Inertia forces are caused by lateral and vertical

    movement of the ground AASHTO 2007 adopts spectral maps for the design

    acceleration coefficient As of the moment, spectral maps are still unavailable for the

    Philippines and most of the country will still be using an acceleration coefficient of 0.4 (except for the Palawan area).

    Bridges : Bridges : Earthquake LoadsEarthquake Loadsy Spectral Map from

    NSCP 1997 Vol 2 Bridges

  • 6/8/2012

    24

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake Earthquake can attack in the two principal directions:

    longitudinal and transverse. Codes specify the following load cases for earthquake to

    cover earthquakes which attack in a diagonal direction

    x 100% Long + 30% Transx 30% Long + 100% Trans

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 1) Apply a unit uniform load on the structure. Call this

    po(x)

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 1) Apply a unit uniform load on the structure. Call this

    po(x)

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 2) Compute the corresponding deflections due to unit

    uniform load. Call these deflection vs(x)

  • 6/8/2012

    25

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 3) Compute uniform load per unit length of structure. Call

    it w(x)

    W(x)

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 4)

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 5) Compute the Period of vibration

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 5) Compute the Elastic Seismic Response coefficient.

    A = Acceleration coefficient S = Site coefficient, this is dependent on the soil of the site

  • 6/8/2012

    26

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 5) Site coefficient valuesx S = 1.0 for rock type foundationx S = 1.2 for stiff clay or deep cohesionless soilx S = 1.5 for soft to medium-stiff claysx S = 2.0 or soft clays or silts

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 6) Compute the actual uniform load on the bridge due to

    earthquake

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 6) It should be noted, that the procedure computes the

    elastic response of the structure. To consider the dissipation of the earthquake force due to

    formation of plastic hinges, the forces computed must be divided by R (the response modification factor)

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Earthquake (Procedure using Single Mode) 6) R factors

    Note the different factors given the importance of the bridge

  • 6/8/2012

    27

    Bridges: Earthquake LoadsBridges: Earthquake Loads

    y Multiple column bent

    Bridges: Earthquake LoadsBridges: Earthquake Loads

    y Single Column

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Lateral Loads come from the following Earthquake (Procedure for estimating forces)x 7) Finally, we must check the overstrength requirements so that the

    columns yield first before the cap beam

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Lateral Loads come from the following Earthquake (Procedure for estimating forces)x 7) Why column hinging? (Contrary to buildings)

    As per the Paper Structural rehabilitation with advanced composites by F. Seible

  • 6/8/2012

    28

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Lateral Loads come from the following Earthquake (Procedure for estimating forces)x 7) The plastic hinges must form in the column before the beamx To do this we require that the Mn of the cap beam is greater than 1.3

    x Mn of the column at a joint.x Also in computing Mn of the column, fy = 1.25 x original value of fy to

    account for strain hardeningx Also to prevent the occurrence of shear failure before flexural failure,

    the whole pier system must be designed for a lateral shear force which gives a moment equal to 1.3 Mn of the column (with yield strength 1.25fy)

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Designing a pier for ductility. Moment failure must precede shear failure Plastic hinges in the columns and not the beams

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Designing a pier for ductility Longitudinal Forces. Compute EQ forces in the pier Get the dead load on the columns (Use Combination Get corresponding 1.3 Mn for axial load due to dead load Get Shear force at top (Call it Vo), that would produce a

    moment in the columns equal to 1.3 Mn

    Compare Vo with the EQ forces to get max shear

    Bridges : Earthquake LoadsBridges : Earthquake Loads

    y Designing a pier for ductility Transverse Forces. 1. Compute EQ forces in the pier2. Get the dead load on the columns (Use Combination 3. Get corresponding 1.3 Mn for axial load for each column due to

    dead load4. Get corresponding V that would produce a moment 1.3 Mn for each

    column. Add all these Vs to produce Vo5. Using Vo and the dead loads, compute the new axial loads on the

    structure.6. Recompute the 1.3Mn for each column given the new axial loads.

    Compute the corresponding Vo as per step 57. The recomputed Vo will now be compared with the shear in step 4.

    If not within 10% repeat step 3.

  • 6/8/2012

    29

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey For integral bridges, it is important to

    compute the effect of creep, shrinkage and temperature due to secondary effects induced by the fixed ends.y The next slides will illustrate the effect of

    secondary stresses on the structure

    FYI: Secondary StressesFYI: Secondary Stresses

    y Given a Bar with length L with one side with no restraints.y If hotter, bar will expandy If colder, bar will contracty The additional or subtracted length, could be expressed as D 'T L

    y Please note that under these conditions, no stress is induced on the bar

    FYI: Secondary StressesFYI: Secondary Stresses

    y Given a Bar with length L with restraints at both ends.y If hotter, bar cant expand, because of this what kind of stress is induced? Compression!

    y If colder, bar cant contract, because of this tension stress is induced at each unit element of the bar

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey As shown on the previous slides, due to

    restraint, there are stresses induced due to creep shrinkage and temperature.y For RC bridges, since we are controlling

    tension, the combination with shrinkage and colder temperature will govern the design!

  • 6/8/2012

    30

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey The major induced deformation loads are

    the following

    y The magnitude of these forces were not previously given in the standard specifications for bridges (NSCP Vol2 1997)

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey Uniform Temperature Change (TU) Describes the seasonal change in temperature

    for a bridge. Ex: If a bridge in PH was constructed at a

    temperature of 30o during summer, TU effects would be large during the cold months like December (say 20o temperatures).

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey Temperature Gradient

    (TG) Due to the difference of

    exposure to the elements of the surface and the underside of the bridge, difference in temperature could occur. Common occurrence is

    the surface is hotter than the rest of the depth of the bridge or the surface is colder than the rest of the depth.

    Hotter at top

    Less hot at the bottom

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey Shrinkage (SH) Shrinkage occurs in concrete and is due to

    the loss of moisture. Shrinkage is composed of two partsx Overall Shrinkagex Differential shrinkage for Composite Decks

  • 6/8/2012

    31

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey Shrinkage (SH) Overall shrinkage is the general shrinkage

    being experienced by the section Differential shrinkage occurs due to the

    difference in age of concrete in composite members. In the section below, the deck slab would shrink more because it is newer.

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey Creep (CR) Creep is the additional deformation due to

    sustained loading. Since dead load and internal prestress forces

    are intended to be there forever, they induce siginificant amount of creep effects.

    Chapter 03 Chapter 03 -- Creep, Shrinkage and Creep, Shrinkage and TemperatureTemperaturey Creep (CR) If the ends of a beam are restrained, creep

    due to dead load + prestress may induce positive moments at the ends. SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS

    CHAPTER 04: LOADS CHAPTER 04: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORSAND LOAD FACTORS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

  • 6/8/2012

    32

    Chapter 04Chapter 04

    y This chapter recommends analysis techniques to be used for bridges.y Things to be discussed: Equivalent Strips for Deck Analysis Distribution Factors for Gravity Loads Dynamic Analysis Specifications for EQ Loads

    Chapter 04Chapter 04

    y Equivalent Strips for deck analysis. It is common for deck slabs to primarily span

    in the transverse direction The bridge code specifies the equivalent

    width of this strip

    Moment Diagram

    A A

    Section A-A

    Gir

    der

    Gir

    der

    P

    Eq. W

    idth

    Chapter 04Chapter 04

    y Equivalent Strips for deck analysis. Equivalent widths as per code

    Chapter 04Chapter 04

    y Distribution Factors approximate the amount of shear and moment that would go to each girder

  • 6/8/2012

    33

    Chapter 4Chapter 4

    y Common Steps for Moment and Shear1. Get the moment produced by the axle

    loads of the truck (note that previously, we use wheel loads for the moment)

    2. Multiply the moment by the distribution factor prescribed by the AASHTO code

    Live LoadsLive Loads

    y Some important terms to note:

    Axle Load Wheel Load

    Chapter 04 Chapter 04 Distribution FactorsDistribution Factors

    y Table of Distribution factors for moment in interior concrete girders.

    WhereS = Spacing, mmTs = thickness of slab, mmL = Span, mmNb = number of beamsKg = factor as detailed on the next page

    Limitations

    Interior

    Chapter 04 Chapter 04 Distribution FactorsDistribution Factors

    y Factor Kg

  • 6/8/2012

    34

    Chapter 04 Chapter 04 Distribution FactorsDistribution Factors

    y Table of Distribution factors for Shear in interior concrete girders.

    WhereS = Spacing, mmTs = thickness of slab, mmL = Span, mmNb = number of beamsKg = factor as detailed on the next page

    Interior

    Chapter 04 Chapter 04 Distribution FactorsDistribution Factors

    y For exterior girders, the moment and shear is computed by getting the reaction on the exterior girder when the wheel loads are placed 0.6m from the parapet.

    0.6m

    Chapter 04 Chapter 04 Dynamic AnalysisDynamic Analysisy The latest code requires a different

    refinement of analysis depending on the bridge importance.y Before we proceed the following acronyms

    are used SM Single Mode UL Uniform load elastic method (simplest

    method for EQ loads) MM Multimode Elastic Method (similar to

    response spectrum analysis) TH Time History Method

    Chapter 04 Chapter 04 Dynamic AnalysisDynamic Analysis

    y Requirements as per code for seismic zone 4

    Note that TH = time history is required for critical bridges. However, this would most likely be revised due to the lack of a time history record for the Philippines.

  • 6/8/2012

    35

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 05: CONCRETE CHAPTER 05: CONCRETE STRUCTURESSTRUCTURES

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y Provisions for both reinforced and prestressed concrete are now included in this chapter.y Since equations given for this chapter are

    common for RC design, only the following will be discussed: Provisions for Crack Control Allowable Stresses for Prestressed Beams Cover Requirements for Reinforcement

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y To limit cracking in concrete, the bridge code specifies a minimum amount of spacing which depends on the stress on the steel reinforcement.

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structuresy Note that Class 1 exposure is equivalent to

    limiting the crack width to 0.43mm. The factor Je can be changed accordingly to the desired crack width. (Ex: a Je = 0.5 corresponds to crack width of 0.22mm.)

  • 6/8/2012

    36

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y Recall that there are multiple stages in the design of a prestress concrete girder.These are Transfer Stage Deck is Cast Service Stage

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y Transfer Stage Forces

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y Deck is Cast

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y Service Stage

  • 6/8/2012

    37

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y For each stage the bridge code specifies limits on the stresses on the girder. Limits for Compressive Stress at Transfer

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y For each stage the bridge code specifies limits on the stresses on the girder. Limits for Tensile Stress at transfer

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y For each stage the bridge code specifies limits on the stresses on the girder. Limits for Compressive Stress at Service

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y For each stage the bridge code specifies limits on the stresses on the girder. Limits for Tensile Stress at Service

  • 6/8/2012

    38

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y For concrete cover, the bridge code recommends the following Min cover to main bars > 25mm Cover to ties and stirrups may be 12mm less

    than the ones specified on the table shown on the next slide.

    Chapter 05 Chapter 05 Concrete StructuresConcrete Structures

    y For concrete cover, the bridge code recommends the following.

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 09: DECKS CHAPTER 09: DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMSAND DECK SYSTEMS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y For this chapter, only provisions for concrete deck slabs will be discussed.

  • 6/8/2012

    39

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y Depth > 175mm unless specified by the bridge owneryWhen deck skew does not exceed 25o,

    the transverse reinforcement may be parallel to the skew. Otherwise, it should be perpendicular.

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y Skew less than 25o.

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y Skew > 25o. Transverse reinforcement now perpendicular to longitudinal.

    Skew Angle

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y The reinforcement may be designed empirically as long as the following conditions are satisfied Supporting components are made of steel or

    concrete The deck is fully cast-in-place and water cured The deck has a uniform depth

  • 6/8/2012

    40

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y The reinforcement may be designed empirically as long as the following conditions are satisfied The ratio of effective length to design depth

    does not exceed 18 and is not less than 6.0 Core depth of the slab is not less than

    100mm

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y The reinforcement may be designed empirically as long as the following conditions are satisfied Effective length (s effective) does not exceed

    4100mm

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y The reinforcement may be designed empirically as long as the following conditions are satisfied There is an overhang beyond the external

    girder with a span of 5xSlabThickness. 28 day strength of the deck = 28 MPa Deck is composite with the deck

    components. Minimum 4 layers of reinf.

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y Minimum reinforcement as per empirical requirements 0.570mm2/mm for steel in bottom layer 0.380mm2/mm for steel in top layer

  • 6/8/2012

    41

    Chapter 09: Deck SlabsChapter 09: Deck Slabs

    y Traditional design It is still permitted to design the slabs as

    conventional flexure elements. Distribution reinforcement is recommended

    as follows

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 11: CHAPTER 11: ABUTMENTS, PIERS AND ABUTMENTS, PIERS AND WALLSWALLS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy This chapter provides the provisions for

    earth pressure forces for conventional and MSE-type retaining walls.

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy This chapter also specifies the capacity of

    typical soil nails into soil or concrete.

  • 6/8/2012

    42

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy Typical checks for conventional retaining

    walls are as follows Bearing Resistance Overturning Subsurface Erosion Passive Resistance Sliding

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy Of particular importance in this chapter is

    the appendix regarding Seismic Design of Abutments and Gravity Retaining Structuresy This appendix details the Mononobe Okabe

    method for retaining walls.

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy An illustration of the Mononobe-Okabe

    loads for the active wedge

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy Variables relevant with figure on the

    previous slide

  • 6/8/2012

    43

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy Important things to note from Appendix

    of Chapter 11 For nonyielding abutments, it is recommended

    to multiply the acceleration coefficient by 1.5

    For seismic zone 4 it is recommended to have monolithic/integral abutments to minimize damage

    Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and Chapter 11: Abutments, Piers and WallsWallsy Example of Non-yielding abutments.

    w/ Raked Piles w/ Soil Nails

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 13: CHAPTER 13: RAILINGSRAILINGS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    Chapter 13: RailingsChapter 13: Railings

    y Railings are intended for two things To prevent wayward vehicles from going over

    the bridge and protect adjacent property To protect pedestrians from wayward vehicles

  • 6/8/2012

    44

    Chapter 13: RailingsChapter 13: Railings

    y Railings are intended for the following To prevent wayward vehicles from going over

    the bridge and protect adjacent property To protect pedestrians from wayward vehicles Protection of other vehicles near the

    collission

    Chapter 13: RailingsChapter 13: Railingsy Railings are intended to have different

    levels of protection according to the use of the road. Test Level One (TL-1) Areas w/ low speed

    and low traffic volume TL-2 Collector roads with favorable site

    conditions w/ a small number of heavy vehicles TL-3 Generally acceptable for many high

    speed arterial highways w/ favorable site conditions.

    Chapter 13: RailingsChapter 13: Railingsy Railings are intended to have different

    levels of protection according to the use of the road. TL-4 Generally acceptable for high speed

    highways with a mixture of trucks and heavy vehicles TL-5 Similar to TL-4 but with unfavorable

    site conditions (Ex: A wayward vehicle may collide with valuable property) TL-6 similar to TL-6 but traffic is expected

    to have tanker type trucks

    Chapter 13: RailingsChapter 13: Railings

    y The height of railing has a requirement depending on the TL level.

    TL Height (mm)

    1 685

    2 685

    3 685

    4 810

    5 1070

    6 2290

  • 6/8/2012

    45

    Chapter 13: RailingsChapter 13: Railingsy Design forces prescribed for railings are

    as follows

    SECTION HIGHLIGHTS SECTION HIGHLIGHTS CHAPTER 14: JOINTS CHAPTER 14: JOINTS AND BEARINGSAND BEARINGS

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Vol 2

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y Though integral bridges are recommended by the latest bridge code, expansion joints are still needed for very long bridges

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y Commonly used bearings for expansion joints are Elastomeric Bearing Pads made of rubber.y To add the capacity of Elastomeric

    Bearing Pads, they are often reinforced with steel plates as shown below.

  • 6/8/2012

    46

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Shape Factor Allowable Compressive Stress and Deflection Allowable Shear (Lateral) Deformation Allowable Rotation Stability

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads AASHTO 2007 recommends two methods

    named Method A and Method B. For this presentation only excerpts from

    Method B will be shown.

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Properties recommended for bearing pads are

    shown below.

    Shear Modulus G for each hardness

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Shape Factorx The shape factor is defined as the ratio of the area

    to the side area free to bulge.x Looking at one sample below.

    L

    W

    hriArea

    Side Area Free to Bulge=

    Note that this is done for each layer for reinforced bearing pads

  • 6/8/2012

    47

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Compressive stress (allowable values shown

    below)

    Vs = Service Stress due to total loadVL = Service stress due to live load

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Compressive deflection (Live load)

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Compressive deflection (Dead load)

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Compressive deflection (Strain)

  • 6/8/2012

    48

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Since stress is non-linear for

    reinforced/laminated bearings, the following graphs can also be used to compute strain

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Allowable shear deformation limit

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Allowable Rotation for Combined

    Compression and rotationx Uplift requirements are satisfied if

    n = number of interior layers

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Allowable Rotation for Combined

    Compression and rotationx Bearings subject to shear deformation shall satisfy

  • 6/8/2012

    49

    Chapter 14: Joints and BearingsChapter 14: Joints and Bearings

    y The following limits govern the design of Elastomeric Bearing Pads Stabilityx Bearings are considered stable if

    Where

    Design of Reinforced Concrete Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges as per NSCP 2010 Bridges as per NSCP 2010 VolVol 22THE END! Thank you for listening

    By Alden Paul D. Balili, MSCEDLSU-M