aspen-based performance and cost models for process

16
1 Aspen Aspen- Based Performance and Based Performance and Cost Models for Process Simulation Cost Models for Process Simulation and Systems Analysis of Advanced and Systems Analysis of Advanced Power Generation Facilities Power Generation Facilities Edward S. Rubin Departments of Engineering & Public Policy and Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Kickoff Meeting Collaboratory for Process & Dynamic Systems Modeling Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania June 8, 2006 Project Goal Project Goal Utilize existing strengths of current NETL in- house Aspen-based modeling efforts, and the NETL-supported IECM modeling project at Carnegie Mellon, to advance the capabilities and compatibility of both modeling efforts to serve a spectrum of model users and applications

Upload: others

Post on 11-Apr-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

1

AspenAspen--Based Performance and Based Performance and Cost Models for Process Simulation Cost Models for Process Simulation and Systems Analysis of Advanced and Systems Analysis of Advanced

Power Generation FacilitiesPower Generation Facilities

Edward S. RubinDepartments of Engineering & Public Policy and Mechanical Engineering

Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Kickoff MeetingCollaboratory for Process & Dynamic Systems Modeling

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

June 8, 2006

Project GoalProject Goal

• Utilize existing strengths of current NETL in-house Aspen-based modeling efforts, and the NETL-supported IECM modeling project at Carnegie Mellon, to advance the capabilities and compatibility of both modeling efforts to serve a spectrum of model users and applications

Page 2: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

2

The IECMThe IECM

• A desktop computer model developed for DOE/NETL

• Provides preliminary design estimates of performance, emissions, costs and uncertainties:

PC, NGCC and IGCC plantsEmission control systemsCO2 capture and storage options (pre- and post-combustion, oxy-combustion, transport, storage)

• Roughly 1000 users worldwide

IECM Software PackageIECM Software Package(Free at: (Free at: www.iecmwww.iecm--online.comonline.com))

PowerPowerPlantPlant

ModelsModels

GraphicalGraphicalUserUser

InterfaceInterface

Plant andPlant andFuelFuel

DatabasesDatabases

Fuel PropertiesFuel PropertiesHeating ValueHeating ValueCompositionCompositionDelivered CostDelivered Cost

Plant DesignPlant DesignConversion ProcessConversion ProcessEmission ControlsEmission ControlsSolid Waste MgmtSolid Waste MgmtChemical InputsChemical Inputs

Cost FactorsCost FactorsO&M CostsO&M CostsCapital CostsCapital CostsFinancial FactorsFinancial Factors

Plant & ProcessPlant & ProcessPerformancePerformance

-- EfficiencyEfficiency-- Resource useResource use

EnvironmentalEnvironmentalEmissionsEmissions

-- Air, water, landAir, water, land

Plant & ProcessPlant & ProcessCosts Costs -- CapitalCapital

-- O&MO&M-- COECOE

Page 3: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

3

Includes MultiIncludes Multi--Pollutant InteractionsPollutant Interactions

CriteriaAir

Pollutants

PMSO2

NOx

HazardousAir

Pollutants

HgHClH2SO4

CO2

CH4

GreenhouseGas

Emissions

Advanced Power Systems in IECMAdvanced Power Systems in IECM

• PC plant w/wo post-combustion CO2 capture

• PC plant w/wo oxyfuel combustion

• NGCC plant w/wo post-combustion capture

• IGCC plant w/wo pre-combustion capture

Page 4: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

4

Select Plant Type

A Quick Tour of the IECMA Quick Tour of the IECM

PC Plant with CCSPC Plant with CCS

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Page 5: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

5

Oxyfuel Plant with CCSOxyfuel Plant with CCS

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

NGCC Plant with CCSNGCC Plant with CCS

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Page 6: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

6

IGCC Plant with CCSIGCC Plant with CCS

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Specify Fuel Properties

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Page 7: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

7

Set Power Block Parameters

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Specify Gasifier Parameters

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

c

Page 8: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

8

Set Financial Parameters

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Get Results for Overall Plant

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Page 9: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

9

Results for Plant Mass Flows

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Results for Plant Costs

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Page 10: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

10

Results for Specific Components

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Illustrative Probabilistic ResultsIllustrative Probabilistic Results

Cum

ulat

ive

Prob

abili

ty

Total Capital Requirement ($/kW)1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Page 11: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

11

A Related Project: A Related Project: IECM in a Virtual Engineering IECM in a Virtual Engineering

EnvironmentEnvironment

(In collaboration with Iowa State University)(In collaboration with Iowa State University)

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

IGCC Plant Visualization (270 MWnet)

Page 12: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

12

IGCC w/CCS (740 MWnet)

PC Plant – Current Emission Controls

Page 13: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

13

PC Plant w/ CCS(Advanced amine system)

Oxyfuel Combustion Plant

Page 14: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

14

NGCC Plant

NGCC Plant w/ CCS

Page 15: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

15

NGCC-CCS Flyby

The Collaboratory ProjectThe Collaboratory Project

E.S. Rubin, Carnegie Mellon

Page 16: Aspen-Based Performance and Cost Models for Process

16

Project Objectives Project Objectives (1)(1)• For selected power system components, develop

reduced order models that run quickly and efficiently in a variety of widely-used modeling environments (e.g., IECM, Aspen Custom Modeler)

IGCC plants with and without CO2 capture and storage:– Alternative gasifier designs (e.g., GE quench, GE radiant,

Shell, E-Gas, Transport Reactor) – Alternative acid gas removal systems (e.g., amine system,

Selexol, Rectisol)– Alternative gas turbines (e.g., GE Frames 7FA, 7FB, G, H)

• Year 1 focus is on one alternative gasifier; Years 2 and 3 will focus on additional plant components

Project Objectives Project Objectives (2)(2)

• Incorporate and link economic cost models in Aspen-based performance models of advanced gasification-based power systems

Equation-based models for capital cost, operating and maintenance (O&M) cost, and total cost of electricityUtilize current IECM cost modelsEPRI TAG methodology Implement in Aspen Plus as a User Block

• Year 1 focus is on GE Quench gasifier IGCC system