assessing savannas with the iucn red list of ecosystems

14
Assessing savannas with the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Dr Lucie Bland The University of Melbourne Savanna Science Network 2016

Upload: others

Post on 03-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Assessing savannas with the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems

Dr Lucie Bland

The University of Melbourne

Savanna Science Network 2016

@LucieMBland The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems

@LucieMBland Implementation

@LucieMBland What is an ecosystem and ecosystem collapse?

• Tansley (1935): biotic assemblage + abiotic environment

+ interactions + physical extent.

• We are working on a global classification.

• Collapse:

- Ecosystems decline in quality and quantity.

- Transformation of identity, loss of defining features and/or

replacement by a novel ecosystem.

- Bounded thresholds in key defining features.

@LucieMBland Risk assessment protocol

@LucieMBland Red Listing savannas

• Open and closed savannas of Venezuela

(Version 1.0).

• Two savannas in El Salvador (Crespin et al. 2015).

• Closed-source assessments in Colombia and Brazil (2015).

• Coolibah Black Box Woodland (Keith et al. 2013).

@LucieMBland Coolibah Black Box woodland

• Classification.

• Distribution.

• Characteristic native biota.

• Abiotic environment.

• Key processes.

• Threats.

• Collapse definition.

Mature Regenerating

@LucieMBland Criteria A & B

• Criterion A: Decline in distribution

- A1: 33-58% decline over 50 years: Endangered (Vulnerable-Endangered).

- A2: Complex trends in future clearing and water availability. Data Deficient.

- A3: Historic decline of 65% (50-70%) Vulnerable.

• Criterion B: Restricted distribution

- EOO: 266,400 km2

- AOO: 1193 grid cells

- Locations: 5+.

- Least Concern.

@LucieMBland Criteria C & D

• Criterion C: Environmental degradation

- C1: Median flow declined by 54-60%. Endangered.

- C2: No future projections. Data Deficient.

- C3: 54-60% decline. Vulnerable.

• Criterion D: Biotic disruption

- Vegetation responses to grazing, changes in structure,

abundance of invasive plants (Phyla canescens).

- Insufficient data available on these processes.

- Data Deficient under criteria D1, D2 and D3.

• Criterion E: Ecosystem Viability Analysis

- Not Evaluated.

@LucieMBland Criterion E

• Ecosystem Viability Analysis:

- Predict variable for which collapse threshold has been defined.

- Incorporate stochasticity in ecosystem processes.

- Predict over the same 50-100 year horizon as other criteria.

- Incorporate future scenarios of ecosystem dynamics.

- Scale 0.1-1,000 km.

Probability of ecosystem collapse:

CR ≥ 50% within 50 years

EN ≥ 20% within 50 years

VU ≥ 10% within 100 years

Edge effects

@LucieMBland Coral reef collapse

@LucieMBland Conclusions

• IUCN Red List of Ecosystems is a scientific and practical risk assessment

protocol.

• Sadly, savannas under-represented on the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems.

• Develop case studies or large scale assessments, in particular including data

on ecosystem function.

• Links with management, land-use planning, ecosystem services, and

species threat status.

[email protected] www.lucieblandresearch.wordpress.com

www.iucnredlistofecosystems.com

Funded by: ARC LP130100435.

Thanks to: Emily Nicholson, Tracey Regan, David Keith, Nick Murray, Jon Paul Rodríguez.

Questions?

@LucieMBland Assessment time frames