assessment summary - thomas jefferson...thomas jefferson elementary school was built in 1963. a...

THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Formula for Success:

High Performing Education+

High Performing Facilities+

Community Partnerships=

HIGH PERFORMING STUDENTS

Schools as Teaching Tools

HIG

H P

ER

FOR

MA

NC

E F

AC

ILIT

Y A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

DRAFT

INTRODUCTION: 2012 SUSTAINABLE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN The following is the High Performance Facilities Assessment document for the above mentioned school. The document has been prepared in conjunction with the District’s 2012 Sustainable Facilities Master Plan. This document provides detailed school site assessments documenting the status of existing conditions/systems and highlighting the transformation opportunities within the format of the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS) Best Practices, consistent with the District’s Board Policy Initiatives.

The Facilities Assessment document has been organized in the Sustainable Categories of: Leadership, Education & Innovation Sustainable Sites (All associated disciplines) Water Efficiency (Plumbing systems) Energy & Atmosphere (Mechanical systems) Climate Materials & Resources (Architectural systems) Indoor Air Quality (Electrical systems) Within each sustainable category the designated areas, systems, components, etc. have been grouped by similar scopes of work. The summaries of these groupings have been used to categorize project types which are identified in the final cost summary for this school.

The assessment template provides a matrix documenting the:

1. The Date Last Reviewed is included to allow the District and/or Consultant Team to continually review and maintain this as a “living document” as facilities improvements and/or needs come up through the life of the facility. It is expected that this document be used as a productive tool for planning & design, and maintenance & operation tasks.

2. The Repair / Replace Level records the level of repair or replacement required using a scale of 0-4. Level 4 – New Replacement (Assumes 100% replacement) Level 3 - Major Repair (Assumes 50-75% repair) Level 2 – Minor Repair (Assumes 25-50% repair) Level 1 – Patch and Repair (Assumes 0-25% repair) Level 0 – No observed need to replace, repair or patch

3. Category for site and building components are coded as: C- Code / Life Safety / Access M – Maintenance / Operations HP – High Performance / Modernization / Transformation

4. The Relative Urgency of the need to replace, repair or patch each site or building component is rated. 3 – Critical 2 – Urgent, not critical 1 – Moderate, recommended 0 – No observed need

The Project Cost Summary concludes the assessment with an estimated cost of projects within each of the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Best Practices categories. In addition each project will have a classification of costs based upon the categories of Code / Life Safety / Access, Maintenance & Operations and High Performance / Modernization / Transformation.

Page 5Page XX

Page 8Page 9

Page 21Page 22

0Page 31

Page 40

Page 41Page 42

Page 59Page 60

Page 7Page XX

Page 83

Page 84APPENDIX

Thomas Jefferson Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS High Performance Facility Assessment based on Green and Grid Neutral Model School Policy Initiative

per Board Policy BP 3511 and Resolution #2583.

ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

SUSTAINABLE SITES CHPS Summary

COST SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

LEADERSHIP, EDUCATION & INNOVATION

WATER EFFICIENCY

MATERIALS & RESOURCES

PROJECT INFORMATION School Site / Building Summary Documentation Available & DSA Closeout Status

CHPS SUMMARY

CHPS SUMMARY: PAGE X DETAIL ASSESSMENT

CHPS SUMMARY DETAIL ASSESSMENT- PLUMBING SYSTEMS

CHPS SUMMARY

STRATEGIC PLAN OVERLAY

CHPS SUMMARY DETAIL ASSESSMENT- ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

DETAIL ASSESSMENT- MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

CHPS SUMMARY

CHPS SUMMARY DETAIL ASSESSMENT- ARCHITECTURAL

CLIMATE

The hard-surface playground needs a new asphalt overlay and new pavement markings. Poor play field drainage, an antiquated irrigation system, and water pressure issues need to be addressed in order to increase the usable turf area.

Providing outdoor learning areas and a shade structure would encourage outdoor teaching and provide additional assembly and dining areas. The existing turf and tree landscaping could be improved for better aesthetics and water conservation.

Improvements identified in the 2006 Master Plan Capital Improvements Summary, including a lack of site lighting and traffic along Chestnut Hill Drive, have not been fully implemented, and those needs still exist along with the items listed in this report.

Narrative SummaryThomas Jefferson Elementary School was built in 1963. A subsequent modernization and upgrades improved accessibility, and resolved most HVAC issues. Additional site and building improvements are required to remedy outstanding restroom, signage, and door accessibility issues. The kitchen requires renovation to meet Health Department requirements. The brick exterior and painted finishes are in good condition.

There is ample parking for the current population and a segregated drop-off area exists. Falling tree limbs, large pinecones, and damaged paving create a hazard for automobiles and pedestrians in the parking lot.

Campus Entry

Chestnut Hill Drive

Thomas Jefferson Elementary School


SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012

School Mission StatementOur school mascot is the eagle and our motto is Eagles S. O. A. R.” which stands for ―Safe, Offer peace, Always respectful and Responsible.

‘Student Centered Education’

Site Plan of Campus

School Location Legend

TJES-I

Citadel Way

Notre Dame Drive

Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityTurf field is uneven everywhere and patchy in some places.

Sustainable Sites Campus CoreTurf and plantings nearly non-existent due to shading by mature trees.

Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Groundcover planting could enhance entry and pick-up waiting area.



June 2012

Utility (Gas) Efficiency Exterior No seismic loops / rusting gas pipes.

Energy & AtmosphereOld antiquated HVAC equipment.

Materials & Resources ExteriorPortions of roofing need replacing.

Indoor Environmental Quality Classrooms do not have exit signs or egress lighting. Per current code, rooms should have both.


Water Efficiency InteriorSoap system should not be connected to faucet without backflow prevented.

Materials & Resources InteriorMulti-Purpose Room needs upgrading.

TJES-II

High Performance Transformation

Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.

Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.

Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.

Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.

Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.

Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.


TJES-III



June 2012

‘Student Centered Education’

Site Plan- Concept Study

The Charter School program at Thomas Jefferson Elementary School supports a unique learning environment for its students and families. At this time there has been no programmatic requests made to optimize the facilities to support its educational needs.

TJES-IV



June 2012


List Pending Input from School

School Site Facility(s) Needs The following list was provided by the school’s principal which was generated from school site council and community meetings:

CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools

Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”

In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.

SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points

Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1

Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 2 Climate 10 1 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental

Quality 23/25 8

TOTAL 116 17

Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing

0 17 25 116 PointsTJES

Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems

Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems

Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure

Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems

Campus Assessment Summary

Materials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish

Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation

Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost

Cod

e, L

ife S

afet

y &

Acc

ess

Mai

nten

ance

&

Ope

ratio

ns

High

Per

form

ance

Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n

Project Cost Summary Matrix

Schools as Teaching Tools

$1,208,480

$28,210

$ 88,790

$299,780

$90,610

$ 0

$1,715,870

$2,172,170

$11,570

$179,920

$851,110

$31,460

$ 0

$3,246,230

$340,340

$42,250

$16,770

$1,264,900

$346,320

$0

$2,010,580

$3,720,990

$82,030

$285,480

$2,415,790

$468,390

$0

$6,972,680

Sust

aina

ble

Cat

egor

y To

tal

School NameAddressGrade Levels K-6Site Acreage 9.95*Total Building Area- Permanent Structures

23,209 GSF*

# Classrooms 12**

Affiliation Name PhoneDistrict Representative SCUSD Kim Teague 919-643-2464School Principal SCUSD Bernie Evangelista916-325-0910School Executive Director SCUSD Gary Bowman 916-325-0910Plant Manager SCUSDArchitect NTD Jeff Graden 530-888-0999 jgraden@ntdLandscape Architect MIG Berkeley Susan McKay 510-845-7549 mckay@migMechanical Engineer Capital

EngineeringMike Minge 916-851-3500 Mminge@ca

pital-Electrical Engineer The

Engineering Derek West 530-886-8556 Derek@eng

ent.comCost Estimator Cumming

CorporationBrooks Rehkopf 916-779-7149 brehkopf@c

corpusa.com

Provider Account #

2635 Chestnut Hill Drive, Sacramento, CA 95826

Phone

ElectricGas

[email protected]

SewerWater

[email protected]@cacmp.org

CONTACTS

California Montessori Project, Capitol Campus (Thomas Jefferson ES)

* 2006 SCUSD Facilities Master Plan** 2006-07 School Accountability Report Card

SCHOOL ASSESSMENT LOGDATE / DIVISION / DISCIPLINE TASK LAST REVIEWED04/12 NTD ARCHITECTURE 2012 SUSTAINABLE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN


# Classrooms 4**

Student Population 250

Total Building Area- Portable Structures

5,662 GSFOriginal Construction

SCHOOL SITE SUMMARY

1963 OC / 2004 Mod**

E-Mail

UTILITY PROVIDERSContact Name

Internet / Cable

Project Information: Page 4 of 73

DSA APP#02-105490

02-105272

02-1046165031248766

Construction of ball wall

Construction of 6 bldgs, 2 portable classrooms

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Construction of 2 portable classrooms

Alteration to 2 - C.R. Bldg/s , M.P. Bldg, K.G./Admin Bldg's

Alteration to 2 CR/RESTROOM BUILDINGS, MP BUILDING, & ADMIN./K.G. BUILDING

REPORTS

DSA CLOSEOUT STATUSSTATUS

DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE

DRAWING SETS

PREPARED BY:

Certification & Close of File

SPECIFICATIONS





DATE:

Project Information: Page 5 of 73

Eligible Points Actual Points

Sustainable Sites Total 14 3

Water Efficiency Total 9 0

Energy & Atmosphere Total 29 2

Climate Total 10 1

Materials & Resources Total 18 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Total 25 8

Leadership, Education & Innovation Total 13 1

Totals per School 118 16Eligible Points Actual Points

CLIMATE





CHPS SUMMARY

SUSTAINABLE SITES

ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

WATER EFFICIENCY

CHPS Summary: Page 6 of 73

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

SS1.0 Code Compliance P P Intent: To select sites that are safe and healthy environments.SS1.1 Environmentally

Sensitive Land1 1 Intent : Avoid development on environmentally sensitive sites to reduce

impact of the building footprint. SS1.2 Central Location 1 1 Intent: To make the school more accessible to its occupants, and to

promote smart growth.SS1.3 Joint-Use of Facilities 1 1 Intent: Allow for more community and neighborhood integration within the

school facility.SS1.4 Joint-Use of Parks 1 0 Intent: Allow for more community and neighborhood integration within the

school grounds.SS1.5 Reduced Footprint 1 0 Intent: Reduce the extent of land used for development.

SS2.1 Public Transportation 1 0 Intent: Encourage the use of public transportation.SS2.2 Human Powered

Transportation1 0 Intent : Encourage alternative transportation methods to and from school

that increase physical activity, improve health, and reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

SS2.3 Parking Minimization 1 0 Intent : Discourage the use of automobiles for transportation to and from school.

SS3.0 Construction Site Runoff Control

P 0 Intent: Reduce erosion and negative impacts on water and air quality during construction.

SS3.1 Limit Stormwater Runoff

1 0 Intent : Manage stormwater runoff to limit disruption and pollution of natural waterways.

SS3.2 Treat Stormwater Runoff

1 0 Intent : Control and filter stormwater runoff to limit disruption and pollution of natural waterways.

SS4.1 Reduce Heat Islands - Landscaping

1 0 Intent: Optimize landscape design to reduce the heat island effect.

SS4.2 Reduce Heat Islands - Cool Roofs

1 0 Intent : Employ cool or green roofs to reduce the heat island effect.

SS4.3 School Garden 1 0 Intent : To encourage schools to incorporate teaching gardens.

SS5.1 Light Pollution Reduction

1 0 Intent: Reduce development impacts on the nocturnal environment.

Eligible Points 14 3 Actual Points

5. Outdoor Lighting

4. Outdoor Surfaces & Spaces


CHPS SUMMARY: SUSTAINABLE SITES

Credit # / Title

1. Site Selection

2. Transportation

CHPS- Sustainable Sites: Summary

3. Stormwater Management

CHPS Summary: Sustainable Sites: Page 7 of 73

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch

.1 P.O.T./Sidewalks 3/12 3 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.2 Drive/Drop Off (Parent) 3/12 3 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.3 Drive/Drop Off (Bus) 3/12 3 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.4 Signage- Identification 3/12 2 C 2 Signage on MP building missing "R" in "Jefferson"

.5 Signage- Monument 3/12 0 M 0

.6 Fence 3/12 0 M 0

.7 Gates 3/12 2 C 1 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.8 Site Lighting: Type/Condition

3/12 - - - NA

.9 Site Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

3/12 - - - NA

.10 Building Mtd Lighting: Type/Condition

3/12 4 M 4 Some building fixtures were incandescent fixtures with and without lenses. 60% of building mounted lighting should be replaced.

.11 Building Mtd Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

3/12 4 HP 1 Fixtures can be replaced by LED fixtures to improve coverage and efficiency.

1. School Entry/Drop Off


SUSTAINABLE SITES

Scope

Sustainable Sites: Page 8 of 73

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.12 Lighting Controls Condition

3/12 0 M 0 Non-portable fixtures are controlled by time clock and photocell. Portable fixtures are controlled by switches.

.13 Lighting Controls Efficiency

3/12 4 HP 1 Portable fixtures should be controlled or have time clock/photo cell override.

.14 Planting - Trees Condition

03/12 - - - See Parking & Drives for discussion of trees near entry.

.15 Planting - Trees Adequacy

03/12 4 HP 1 Consider planting 1 or 2 small accent trees in rear turf area to add visual interest to entry.

.16 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Condition

03/12 4 M 1 Turf is patchy and bare in some spots.Mulch is non-existent in shrub area.

.17 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Adequacy

03/12 4 HP 1 Recommend replacing turf with drought tolerant shrubs and groundcovers and mulch.


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.18 Irrigation Condition 03/12 4 M 2 Irrigation system is operated using manual valves.Irrigation bodies are not popping up at correct heights causing ponding to occur.

.19 Irrigation Efficiency 03/12 4 HP 1 Irrigation system oversprays onto sidewalk.Center heads are not spraying full pattern.Recommend an irrigation auditor assess the site's irrigation system as required by City Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance section 15.92.210.

.20 Storm Water Drainage 03/12 0 0 L

.21 Site Furnishings 03/12 0 0 L

.22 Other


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.1 P.O.T./Sidewalks 3/12 2 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.2 Drive 3/12 1 M 1

.3 Staff Parking - Condition 3/12 2 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.4 Staff Parking - Adequacy 3/12 0 HP 0

.5 Student Parking - Condition

3/12 N/A

.6 Student Parking - Adequacy

3/12 HP N/A

.7 Signage- Identification 3/12 2 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.8 Fence 3/12 1 M 1



03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA

.16 Planting-Trees for Shade Condition

03/12 1 M 1 Compacted soil. Amend soil with compost and apply mulch under trees. Recommend arborist assessment.

.17 Planting - Trees for Shade Adequacy

03/12 0 HP 0 Adequate quantity of trees around parking area.


03/12 4 M 1 Turf area is patchy partially due to needle drop under trees.


03/12 4 HP 1 Recommend replacing turf with drought tolerant and shade tolerant shrubs and groundcovers and mulch.

2. Parking & Drives


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.20 Irrigation Condition 03/12 4 M 2 Irrigation system is operated using manual valves.System uses older brass heads that are difficult to replace with like equipment.

.21 Irrigation Efficiency 03/12 4 HP 1 Recommend an irrigation auditor assess the site's irrigation system as required by City Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance section 15.92.210.

.22 Storm Water Drainage 03/12 1 C 3 Drains are covered with needle drop from adjacent pine trees.Drain in path of travel. Recommend moving accessible path of travel. Refer to section 2.1 above.

.23 Other


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.1 Drive/Vehicle Access 3/12 1 M 1

.2 Trash/Recycle Area 3/12 0 M 0 No enclosure for dumpsters

.3 Service Yard 3/12 0 M 0

.4 Signage- Identification 3/12 0 M 0

.5 Fence 3/12 0 M 0



03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - - - Site configuration does not allow space for buffer planting to enhance school appearance.

.17 Irrigation Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

.18 Irrigation Efficiency 03/12 - - - N/A

.19 Storm Water Drainage 03/12 0 M 0

.20 Site Furnishings 03/12 - - -

.21 Other

.1 P.O.T./Walks 3/12 1 M 1

.2 Vehicle Access 3/12 0 M 0

.3 Paved School Yard / Courts

3/12 1 M 1

.4 Pool 3/12 N/A


.6 Fence 3/12 0 M 0



03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA

3. Service Access (Fire/Maintenance/Trash Pick Up)

4. Outdoor Activity


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 1 M 1 Building mounted fixtures provided limit coverage for fixture. Fixtures are adequate for egress, but not for events or activities.


03/12 4 HP 2 Fixtures were non-cut-off type fixtures. Fixtures could be replaced by LED full cut-off fixtures to improve efficiency, coverage and comply with code.


03/12 0 M 0 Non-portable fixtures are controlled by time clock and photocell. Portable fixtures are controlled by switches.


03/12 4 HP 1 Portable fixtures should be controlled or have time clock/photo cell override.

.14 Play Equipment-School-age

03/12 4 M 3 Retaining wall is cracked and sagging in areas.Play equipment surfacing is cracked, exposing rusting metal structure.

.15 Play Equipment-Kinder 03/12 0 M 0


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.16 Sports / Fitness Equipments

03/12 3 C 3 Bent basketball hoops. (M)Baseball cage fencing curled and wire jutting out. (C)

.17 Tennis Courts 03/12 - - - N/A

.18 Football Field 03/12 - - - N/A


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.19 Sports Field 03/12 3 M 1 Turf field is uneven everywhere and patchy in some places.

.20 Other Turf Areas 03/12 - - - N/A

.21 Outdoor Gathering / Seating Areas

03/12 4 HP 1 Consider adding outdoor gathering and seating areas.

.22 Outdoor Learning Area 03/12 4 HP 1 Consider adding outdoor learning area.


03/12 1 M 1 Compacted soil. Amend soil with compost and apply mulch under trees. Recommend arborist assessment.


03/12 3 HP 1 Opportunity for additional trees located in field adjacent to asphalt play area for shade.


03/12 N/A


03/12 0 HP 0


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.27 Irrigation - Fields Condition

03/12 3 M 1 Irrigation system installed 15-20 years ago. Uneven distribution(Dry area doughnuts visible). Recommend flushing system and replacing rotors and nozzles at a minimum.

.28 Irrigations - Fields Efficiency

03/12 4 C 1 Recommend an irrigation auditor assess the site's irrigation system as required by City Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance section 15.92.210.

.29 Irrigation - Other 03/12 - - - N/A

.30 Storm Water Drainage 03/12 4 M 1 Ponding occurs against building due to downspouts draining to asphalt play area.

.31 Site Furnishings 03/12 4 HP 1 Add seating areas.

.32 School Garden 03/12 0 HP 0 Edible garden is in progress by parent volunteers.

.33 Other

.1 P.O.T./Walks 3/12 3 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.2 Vehicle Access - Fire/Emergency

3/12 0 M 0

.3 Vehicle Access - Maintenance

3/12 0 M 0


.5 Fence 3/12 0 M 0



03/12 - - - NA


03/12 - - - NA


03/12 1 M 1 Core light is in ok condition. Fixture lenses need to be cleaned


03/12 4 HP 1 Fixtures are a mixture of full cut-off and non-cut off. LED fixtures would reduce wattage and improve coverage.


03/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are controlled by time clock and photo cell.


03/12 0 M 0 Controls are suitable for the space.

.13 Outdoor Gathering Quad 03/12 - - - N/A

5. Campus Core


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.14 Outdoor Learning Area 03/12 0 HP 0 Recommend adding outdoor learning area.

.15 Trees for Building & Courtyard Shading - Condition

03/12 1 M 1 Compacted soil. Amend soil with compost and applying mulch under trees. Recommend arborist assessment.

.16 Trees for Building & Courtyard Shading - Adequacy

03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 4 M 1 Turf and plantings nearly non-existent due to shading of mature trees.


03/12 4 HP 1 Recommend installing drought tolerant and shade tolerant shrubs and groundcovers and mulch.

.19 Irrigation Condition 03/12 4 M 1 Irrigation system is operated using manual valves.Heads are brass along walk and plastic center row.


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.20 Irrigation Efficiency 03/12 4 C 1 Recommend an irrigation auditor assess the site's irrigation system as required by City Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance section 15.92.210.

.21 Storm Water Drainage 03/12 0 0

.22 Site Furnishings 03/12 0 0

.23 Other

.1 Fire Service / Hydrants 03/12 3 C 2 No Hydrants Observed on Site

.2 Irrigation POC (meter & BFU)

03/12 4 C 3 One BFU on site to service entire school. High potential for contamination of building water from irrigation systems.

.3 Irrigation Controls 03/12 4 HP 1 Irrigation controller is outdated and does not offer automatic schedule adjustment based on rain/soil moisture/temperature/ET. Recommend installing new smart controllers with flow sensor/master valve assembly and appropriate schedule adjusting sensors. Convert manual irrigation systems to automatic.

.4 Other

03/12 4 HP 1 Recommend an irrigation auditor assess the site's irrigation system as required by City Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance section 15.92.210.

6. Utilities / Infrastructure


Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints


WE1.0 Create Water Use Budget

P P Intent: To prevent excessive water use for irrigation.

WE1.1 Reduce Potable Water for Use for Non-Recreational Landscaping Area

1-2 0 Intent : Reduce or eliminate potable water use for landscape irrigation.

WE1.2 Reduce Potable Water for Recreational Area Landscaping

1 0 Intent: Reduce or eliminate potable water use for irrigating recreational areas.

WE1.3 Irrigation System Testing and Training

1 0 Intent: Verify that the sites irrigation systems and controls are operating as intended and that effective training has been provided.

WE2.1 Reduce Sewage Conveyance from Toilets and Urinals

2 0 Intent: Reduce wastewater generated and/or the amount of potable water used for sewage conveyance.

WE2.2 Reduce Indoor Potable Water Use

1-2 0 Intent : Reduce the use of indoor potable water.

WE3.1 Water Management System

1 0 Intent: Provide ongoing accountability and optimization of the building and site water performance over time.



3. Water Efficiency

2. Indoor Systems

1. Outdoor Systems


CHPS SUMMARY: WATER EFFICIENCY

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Water Efficiency: Page 20 of 73

Dat

e L

ast

Ass

esse

d

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


1. Domestic Water Service

.1 BFP 03/12 0 M 0 -

.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. Fire Protection.1 BFP 03/12 - - - N/A.2 FDC 03/12 - - - N/A.3 PIV 03/12 - - - N/A.4 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

3. Sanitary Sewer.1 Condition 03/12 - - - Not observable.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

4. Drinking Fountain - Site

.1 Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

.2 Efficiency 03/12 - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems

.1 Sink Condition 03/12 4 C 2 Soap system should not be connected to faucet without backflow preventer

.2 Sink Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 0 -

.3 Lavatories Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

.4 Lavatories Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A

Campus Systems

Building - Administration


WATER EFFICIENCY

Scope

Water Efficiency: Page 21 of 73


.5 Urinals Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

.6 Urinals Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A

.7 Water Closets Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A

.9 Showers Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

.10 Showers Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A

.11 Drinking Fountain Cond 03/12 - - - N/A

.12 Drinking Fountain Effic 03/12 - HP - N/A

.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A

.14 Floor Drains 03/12 0 M 0 -

.15 Gas Distribution 03/12 2 C 3 Gas pipe not anchored to roof

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 03/12 - - - N/A

.17 Condensate Drain 03/12 0 M 0 -

.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/AN/A

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation03/12 - - - N/A

.2 Clay Separation 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

3. Fire Protection Systems

.1 Fire Systems 03/12 - - - N/A

.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 03/12 0 M 0 -.2 Sink Efficiency 03/12 2 HP 1 50% of fixtures are water efficient.3 Lavatories Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.4 Lavatories Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.5 Urinals Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.6 Urinals Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.7 Water Closets Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

Building - Multi-Purpose








.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A


.15 Gas Distribution 03/12 0 M 0 -



.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 03/12 1 M 1 -.2 Sink Efficiency 03/12 3 HP 1 25% of fixtures are water efficient.3 Lavatories Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.4 Lavatories Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.5 Urinals Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.6 Urinals Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.7 Water Closets Condition 03/12 0 M 0 Kindergarten

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 0 100% of kindergarten water closets are water efficient





.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A

.14 Floor Drains 03/12 - - - N/A

Building - Kindergarten Classrooms (2) / Classrooms



.15 Gas Distribution 03/12 3 C 2 No seismic loops / Rusting gas pipes



.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A







.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A





.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

Building - Portable 7a






.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A







.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A





.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 03/12 1 M 1 -.2 Sink Efficiency 03/12 1 HP 1 75% of fixtures are water efficient.3 Lavatories Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.4 Lavatories Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.5 Urinals Condition 03/12 - - - N/A

Building - Portables 7c

Building - Portable 7b



.6 Urinals Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A

.7 Water Closets Condition 03/12 - - - N/A






.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A





.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.2 Sink Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.3 Lavatories Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.4 Lavatories Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.5 Urinals Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.6 Urinals Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.7 Water Closets Condition 03/12 - - - N/A






.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A


.15 Gas Distribution 03/12 - - - N/A


Building - 7d



.17 Condensate Drain 03/12 2 M 1 Air conditioner condensate drain not trapped

.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.2 Sink Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.3 Lavatories Condition 03/12 0 M 0 -.4 Lavatories Efficiency 03/12 2 HP 1 50% of fixtures are water efficient.5 Urinals Condition 03/12 0 M 0 -.6 Urinals Efficiency 03/12 2 HP 1 50% of fixtures are water efficient.7 Water Closets Condition 03/12 0 M 0 -

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 03/12 2 HP 1 50% of fixtures are water efficient





.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A




.17 Condensate Drain 03/12 - - - N/A

.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A-

Building - Student Restrooms






.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.2 Sink Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A.3 Lavatories Condition 03/12 0 M 0 -.4 Lavatories Efficiency 03/12 2 HP 1 50% of fixtures are water efficient.5 Urinals Condition 03/12 0 M 0 -.6 Urinals Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 0 -.7 Water Closets Condition 03/12 0 M 0 -

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 03/12 2 HP 1 50% of fixtures are water efficient





.13 Floor Sinks 03/12 - - - N/A




.17 Condensate Drain 03/12 - - - N/A

.18 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



.2 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

Building - Staff Restrooms


Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints


EE1.0 Minimum Energy Performance

P P Intent: Establish a minimum energy efficiency level.

EE1.1 Superior Energy Performance

1-15 0 Intent : Exceed the minimum energy performance beyond the prerequisite.

EE1.2 Energy Conservation Interlocks

1 0 Intent: Conserve energy loss through building openings with the use of interlocks connected to the HVAC system.

EE1.3 Natural Ventilation 3-4 1 Intent: Maximize natural ventilation (without mechanical cooling systems) by relying on outside air movement through classroom buildings.

EE1.4 Energy Management Systems

1-2 1 Intent: Provide ongoing accountability and optimization of the building energy performance over time.

EE2.1 On-site Renewable Energy

1-5 0 Intent : Encourage on-site energy production with renewable sources.

EE3.0 Fundamental Commissioning

P P Intent: Verify that the building energy systems are designed, installed, calibrated and perform as intended and that effective training has been provided.

EE3.1 Enhanced Commissioning

1-2 0 Intent : Verify that the buildings energy systems are designed, installed, calibrated to perform as intended.


3. Commissioning & Training


2. Alternate Energy Sources

1. Energy Efficiency


CHPS SUMMARY: ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Energy and Atmosphere: Page 29 of 73

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


1. Central Plant.1 Boiler: Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.2 Boiler: Efficiency 03/12 - - - N/A.3 Chiller: Condition 03/12 - - - N/A.4 Chiller: Efficiency 03/12 - - - N/A.5 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

Campus Systems


ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

Scope

Energy and Atmosphere: Page 30 of 73

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 2 M 1 The existing HVAC system consists of a "Reznor" Gas

fired Air Handler coupled to a Roof Mounted "Carrier" Condensing Unit.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 3/12 0 HP 1

.3 Ductwork 3/12 0 M 0 Ductwork is in good condition.

.4 Ventilation 3/12 0 M 0 Outside air is provided thru exterior louvers.

.5 EMS Systems - Condition

03/12 0 M 0 The HVAC systems are currently controlled by "Johnson" Controls which is the new District Standard. The site is integrating to SMUD's SMARTGRID Program. The site installation will be completed by April 2013.

.5 EMS Systems - Efficiency

03/12 - - - N/A

.6 Other 03/12 - - - N/A



3. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 03/12 - - - N/A.2 Fume Hoods 03/12 - - - N/A.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

4. Alternative Energy Systems

.1 Geo-Thermal 03/12 - - - N/A

.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC System consists of "AAON" Gas Fired

Packaged AC-Units. These units are Ground Mounted and where installed in 2008 (4 years old). Note: "AAON" the School District Standard. The MP is a 16 ton and the Kitchen has a 3 Ton Unit.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 1 High Efficiency Units

.3 Ductwork 03/12 1 M 1 Ductwork is in good condition

.4 Ventilation 03/12 0 M 0 Units have full airside economizers

.5 EMS Systems: Cond 03/12 0 M 0 The HVAC systems are currently controlled by "Johnson" Controls which is the new District Standard. The site is integrating to SMUD's SMARTGRID Program. The site installation will be completed by April 2013.

.6 EMS Systems: Effic 03/12 - - - N/A

.7 Other 03/12 - - - N/A


Building - Multi-Purpose




.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 0 M 0 The system consists of Gas Fired Furnaces mounted

inside interior closets -"Carrier" Weathermaker 9200 Ultra Efficient, and "Carrier" Roof Mounted Condensing Units. The units where installed in 2002.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 - HP - N/A

.3 Ductwork 03/12 0 M 0 Ductwork was exposed in the classroom, and is in good condition.

Building - Kindergarten Classrooms (2) / Classrooms


.4 Ventilation 03/12 0 M 0 Full airside economizers have been provided



.7 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

3. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 03/12 - - - N/A.2 Fume Hoods 03/12 - - - N/A.3 Other 03/12 - - N/A



.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 3 C 2 The HVAC System consists of (2) separate systems (1)

corner mounted Gas fired Heating Furnace (original) and a single window mounted cooling units.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 4 HP 1

.3 Ductwork 03/12 4 C 3 Ductwork is inadequate and is sized for heating only

.4 Ventilation 03/12 4 C 3 Code required Outside Air is only provided in the heating mode


03/12 2 M 3 The heating furnace is controlled by a Honeywell Thermostat. The cooling unit has it's own onboard controls. The site will be connected to the District SMUD SMART Grid Program. The installation will be completed by April 2013.


03/12 4 M 3 Existing Equipment has poor Control Strategies.

.6 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 0 M 0 The system consists of Gas Fired Furnaces mounted

inside interior closets -"Carrier" Weathermaker 9200 Ultra Efficient, and "Carrier" Roof Mounted Condensing Units. The units where installed in 2002.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 1 Ultra Efficient Equipment

Building - Portable 7b

Building - Portable 7a


.3 Ductwork 03/12 0 M 0 Ductwork is in good condition

.4 Ventilation 03/12 0 M 0 Full airside economizers have been provided


.6 EMS Systems: Effect 03/12 - - - N/A

.7 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 4 M 3 The oldest of these two portables is served by an old

(+20) "Akla-Servel" Gas Fired Chiller coupled to an indoor Lennox Furnace.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 4 HP 3 Install high efficient equipment

.3 Ductwork 03/12 3 M 3 Ductwork to be replace in it's entirety

.4 Ventilation 03/12 3 M 2 Air economizer to be provided

Building - Portables 7c


.5 EMS Systems: Cond 03/12 0 M 0 The HVAC systems are currently controlled by Programmable Thermostats. The site is integrating to SMUD's SMARTGRID Program. The site installation will be completed by April 2013.

.6 EMS Systems: Effic 03/12 0 HP 0 N/A

.7 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC system consist of "Bard" Wall

Mounted Heat Pumps..2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 1 All Electric Heat Pump.3 Ductwork 03/12 1 M 0 Ductwork is in good condition, cleaning recommended.

.4 Ventilation 03/12 0 M 0 Fixed minimum outside air has been provided.


03/12 0 M 0 The HVAC systems are currently controlled by Programmable Thermostats. The site is integrating to SMUD's SMARTGRID Program. The site installation will be completed by April 2013.


03/12 - - - N/A

.6 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 3 M 2 No heating or cooling provided in 50% of the staff toilets

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 0 N/A

.3 Ductwork 03/12 3 M 1 No Exhaust ducts in 50% of the staff toilets

.4 Ventilation 03/12 1 M 1 ventilation is achieved via operable windows

.5 EMS Systems: Cond 03/12 - - - N/A


.7 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

Building - Portables 7d

Building - Staff Restrooms





.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

2. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 03/12 3 M 2 No heating or cooling provided in 50% of the staff toilets

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 03/12 0 HP 0 N/A

.3 Ductwork 03/12 3 M 1 No Exhaust ducts in 50% of the staff toilets

.4 Ventilation 03/12 1 M 1 ventilation is achieved via operable windows

.5 EMS Systems: Cond 03/12 - - - N/A


.7 Other 03/12 - - - N/A




.2 Solar 03/12 - - - N/A

.3 Other 03/12 - - - N/A

Building - Student Restrooms


Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints


CL1.1 Climate Change Action 1-3 1 Intent: Encourage the use of measures that reduce school contributions to greenhouse gas emissions from school design and construction projects.

CL2.1 Grid Neutral 2 0 Intent : Encourage grid neutral schools to conserve energy, and take advantage of clean, efficient renewable energy solutions.

CL2.2 Zero Net Energy 5 0 Intent : Encourage zero net energy schools to conserve energy, take maximum advantage of clean, efficient renewable energy solutions, and to minimize greenhouse gas emissions from primary energy use associated with buildings, typically space heating and cooling, lighting, water heating, and technology/plug loads, for example.



2. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction

1. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction


CHPS SUMMARY: CLIMATE

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Climate: Page 38 of 73

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints


ME1.0 Storage and Collection of Recyclables

P P Intent: Facilitate the separation and collection of materials for recycling

ME2.0 Minimum Construction Site Waste Management

P n/a Intent: Divert construction and demolition waste from landfills.

ME2.1 Construction Site Waste Management

1-2 n/a Intent : Divert the amount of construction and demolition waste beyond the prerequisite (ME2.0).

ME3.1 Building Reuse - Structure and Shell

1-2 1 Intent: Increase the reuse of existing building structure and shell.

ME3.2 Building Reuse - Interior Non-structural Elements

1 1 Intent : Increase the reuse of interior non-shell elements.

ME4.1 Recycled Content 1-2 0 Intent: Specify and install recycled content products in order to reduce the environmental impacts associated with extraction and processing of virgin materials.

ME4.2 Rapidly Renewable and Organically Grown Materials

1-2 0 Intent : Specify and install materials that replenish themselves faster than traditional extraction demand and are organically grown.

ME4.3 Certified Wood 1 0 Intent : Specify and install sustainably harvested wood.ME4.4 Salvaged Materials 1-2 0 Intent : Specify and install salvaged materials to limit waste and the use of

raw materials.

ME5.1 Environmentally Preferable Products

1-2 0 Intent: Reward the use of sustainable materials by providing a more flexible option.

ME6.1 Environmental Performance Reporting

1-4 0 Intent: Reward the use of materials that have undergone life cycle analysis (LCA) and/or life cycle impact analysis (LCIA) on the environment and human health.


5. Sustainable Materials - Multi Attribute


6. Sustainable Materials - LCIA

4. Sustainable Materials - Single Attribute

1. Recycling

3. Building Reuse

2. Construction Waste Management


CHPS SUMMARY: MATERIALS & RESOURCES

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Materials and Resources: Page 39 of 73

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.1 Signage 03/12 4 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.2 Door Hardware 03/12 4 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

03/12 0 M 0 Existing 9x9 VAT flooring

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

03/12 4 HP 1 Provide New Resilient Flooring

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

03/12 0 M 0

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

03/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

03/12 0 M 0

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

03/12 0 HP 0

A. INTERIOR SPACE EVALUATION1. Administration

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL



Scope

Materials and Resources: Page 40 of 73

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

03/12 3 C 1 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

03/12 4 HP 1 Replace Existing Casework with New

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

03/12 0 M 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

03/12 0 HP 0

.13 Window Shades: Condition

03/12 0 M 0

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

03/12 0 HP 0

.15 Other







2. Kindergarten


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 0 M 0 Plywood Wall Finish


03/12 4 HP 1 Replace Plywood Wall Finish with Gypsum Board


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0




03/12 3 HP 1 Modify Classroom Casework for Accessibility. Replace Workroom Casework with New.


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 0 M 0 Existing Vinyl Blackout Curtains


03/12 4 HP 1 Provide Blackout Roller Shades

.15 Other


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.1 Signage 03/12 4 C 2 Non-compliant.



03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0






03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0




03/12 3 HP 1 Modify Renovated Casework for Accessibility









.15 Other




03/12 0 M 0

4. Multipurpose Room

3. Classrooms


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 0 M 0 Existing Wood Paneling


03/12 3 HP 1 Replace Wood Paneling with Gypsum Board and FRP Wainscot


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 4 HP 1 Provide Suspended Acoustic Tile Ceiling System


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - HP - N/A


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 4 HP 1 Provide Acoustic Wall Panels


03/12 0 M 0 Existing Metal Louver System



.15 Other


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.1 Signage 03/12 4 C 2 Non-compliant



03/12 4 C 2 Non-Compliant. Existing 9x9 VAT flooring


03/12 4 HP 1 Provide Quarry Tile Flooring


03/12 1 M 1


03/12 2 HP 1 Paint Walls


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 2 HP 1 Paint Ceiling


03/12 2 C 2 Casework/Counters Non-Compliant


03/12 3 HP 1 Modify Casework for Accessibility


03/12 0 M 0

5. Kitchen


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - HP -

.15 Other 03/12 3 C 2 Non-compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.1 Signage 03/12 4 C 2 Non-Compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.2 Door Hardware 03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 0 M 0




03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 1 M 1


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - HP - N/A

.15 Lift & Stairs 03/12 2 C 2 Non-Compliant. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

.1 Signage 03/12 4 C 2 Non-compliant






6. Stage

7. Staff Lounge


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 1 M 1




03/12 1 M 1 Existing Glu-On Tiles


03/12 3 HP 1 Replace Acoustic Tiles with Acoustic Plaster






03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re





03/12 2 M 1 50% of Restrooms Renovated. See 2009 Accessibility Survey


03/12 4 HP 1 Renovate Remaining Restrooms and Make Previously Renovated Restrooms Comply with Current Code Requirements






03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0 Paint Ceilings


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - HP - N/A

.11 Other 03/12 4 C 2 50% of Restrooms Renovated. See 2009 Accessibility Survey

8. Restrooms- Staff


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re













03/12 0 M 0 Open to Structure


03/12 4 HP 1 Provide Gypsum Board Ceiling


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - HP - N/A

.11 Other 03/12 4 C 2 50% of Restrooms Renovated. See 2009 Accessibility Survey


.2 Door Hardware 03/12 4 C 2 Non-compliant.


03/12 0 M 0 Existing Exposed Concrete Floors at Utility Rooms


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 1 M 1



10. Utility / Support Spaces

9. Restrooms- Students


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 1 M 1


03/12 2 HP 1 Paint Ceiling


03/12 4 M 1


03/12 4 HP 1 Replace Casework / Shelving


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 - - - N/A


03/12 - HP - N/A

.15 Other












03/12 1 M 1 Existing Glu-On Ceiling Tiles


03/12 4 HP 1 Provide Suspended Acoustic Tile Ceiling System

11. Permanent Modular Building (7a)


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re







03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0





.15 Other




03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 1 M 1


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 1 M 1


03/12 0 HP 0

12. Portables (7b)


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re





03/12 2 HP 1 Modify Casework for Accessibility


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0

.15 Other




03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0






03/12 1 M 1


03/12 0 HP 0

13. Portables (7c)


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re







03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0





.15 Other


.2 Door Hardware 03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 M 0

14. Portable (7d) 4th R Owner By the City


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 1 M 1


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 3 C 2 Non-compliant.


03/12 4 HP 1


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0

.15 Other


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.1 Roof: Condition 03/12 2 M 2 Existing Built-Up Roofing

.2 Roof: Performance 03/12 4 HP 1 Replace Existing Roofing with New Single-Ply Roofing

.3 Skylights 03/12 - - - N/A

.4 Walls / Finishes 03/12 1 M 1

.5 Soffits / Overhangs 03/12 0 M 0

.6 Gutters / Downspouts 03/12 0 M 0

.7 Doors 03/12 1 M 1

.8 Window Systems: Condition

03/12 0 M 0 Existing Metal Sash Single-Pane Window Systems

.9 Window Systems: Performance

03/12 4 HP 1 Provide High-Performance Window Systems

.10 Covered Walks 03/12 0 M 0

.11 Paint Condition 03/12 1 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 03/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

.1 Roof: Condition 03/12 2 M 2

.2 Roof: Performance 03/12 4 HP 1 Replace Existing Roofing with New Single-Ply Roofing

.3 Skylights 03/12 - - - N/A




.7 Doors 03/12 1 M 1

1. Building: B. EXTERIOR FINISH EVALUATION

2. Building 2 (Multi-Purpose):


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



03/12 2 M 2 Existing Metal Sash Single-Pane Window Systems. Broken Glass at Clerestory


03/12 4 HP 1 Replace Clerestory Window Systems with Translucent Panel System

.10 Covered Walks 03/12 0 M 0



.13 Other


.2 Roof: Performance 03/12 4 HP 1 Replace Existing Built-Up Roofing with Single-Ply

.3 Skylights 03/12 - - - N/A



.6 Gutters / Downspouts 03/12 - - - N/A

.7 Doors 03/12 1 M 1


03/12 0 M 0 Existing Metal Sash Single-Pane Window Systems


03/12 4 HP 1 Provide High-Performance Window Systems

.10 Covered Walks 03/12 - - - N/A



3. Building 3 (Permanent Modular - 7a & 7c):


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.13 Other


.2 Roof: Performance 03/12 0 HP 0

.3 Skylights 03/12 - - - N/A




.7 Doors 03/12 1 M 1


03/12 0 M 0


03/12 0 HP 0

.10 Covered Walks 03/12 - - - N/A



.13 Other

Portables (7b & 7d)


Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints


EQ1.1 Daylighting 1-4 1 Intent: Provide high quality daylighting in classrooms to enhance student performance.

EQ1.2 View Windows 1 1 Intent : Provide a visual connection to the outdoors.EQ1.3 Electric Lighting 1 0 Intent: Provide high quality and flexible classroom lighting.

EQ2.0A Minimum HVAC and Construction IEQ

P P Intent : Establish minimum HVAC standards and construction practices for indoor air quality.

EQ2.0B ASHRAE 55 Thermal Comfort Code and Moisture Control

P P Intent: Provide a thermally comfortable environment with moisture controls.

EQ2.0C Minimum Filtration P P Intent : Provide minimum adequate air filtration to ensure good indoor air quality.

EQ2.1 Enhanced Filtration 1-2 1 Intent: Provide adequate air filtration to ensure good air quality.EQ2.2 Low-Emitting Materials 1-4 1 Intent : Provide classrooms with acceptably low indoor air

concentrations of harmful volatile organic chemicals that derive from EQ2.3 Ducted Returns 1 1 Intent: Prevent dust and microbial growth issues associated with

plenum returns.EQ2.4 Thermal Displacement

Ventilation2 1 Intent : Provide effective delivery of ventilation air for improved

occupant comfort, health andEQ2.5 Controllability of

Systems1-4 1 Intent: Enable teachers to have control of the thermal environment

within their classrooms.EQ2.6 Chemical and Pollutant

Source1-2 0 Intent : Prevent building occupants from exposure to potentially

hazardous chemicals.EQ2.7 Mercury Reduction 1 0 Intent: Protect the health of school building occupants, and reduce

disposal costs and liability associated with mercury.

EQ3.0 Minimum Acoustical Performance

P P Intent: Provide classrooms with adequate acoustical environments.

EQ3.1 Improved Acoustical Performance

1 or 3 1 Intent : Provide classrooms with superior acoustical environments.



3. Acoustics

2. Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort

1. Lighting and Daylighting


CHPS SUMMARY: INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 58 of 73

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


1. Electrical Systems.1 Utility Service, Main

Switchboard03/12 0 M 0 300Kva SMUD Transformer severs 2000A Main Switchboard

located outside. Switchboard appears to be adequately sized and has available space.

.2 Other 03/12 4 C 2 Arc Flash labels were missing. Could not determine if coordination study had been performed. All receptacles on campus are not labeled.

2. Technology Systems.1 Utility MPOE/MDF 03/12 0 M 0 Main MDF was located in the toilet building. MDF looked

sufficient for current use.

3. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock/PA Head End 03/12 0 M 0 Clock and speaker system look to be upgraded 10 years ago.

.2 Fire Alarm Control Panel 03/12 0 M 0 System is a Fire lite control panel. Panel looked relatively new and in good condition.

.3 Access, Intrusion, Security Head End

03/12 0 M 0 Security system was relatively new and looked to be in good condition.

1. Electrical Systems.1 Electrical Rooms,

Equipment Location:3/5 - - - NA

.2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 0 M 0 Most of the panel looked to be 10-15 years old.

.3 Receptacles / Branch Circuiting

3/5 0 M 0 Building receptacle quantity looks sufficient.

.4 Other

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 0 M 0 Building has surface mounted 1'x4' fixtures. Fixtures are in

good condition..2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 3/5 0 HP 0 Building lighting levels are sufficient. Fixtures are adequate for

space.3 Controls 3/5 4 HP 3 Building had minimal occupancy sensor..4 Controls:

Efficiency3/5 4 HP 3 Daylighting control and occupancy sensor would reduce the

building's energy usage..5 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 0 M 0 Exit signage was seen. Egress lighting was not located, further

investigation is required.



Scope


Site Utilities & Infrastructure

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 59 of 73

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 3/5 - - - NA.2 Infrastructure (Raceway,

Cabling)3/5 0 M 0 Cabling is Cat 5 in surface mounted raceways.

.3 Workstation / Wireless 3/5 0 M 0 Building has sufficient data connections. Wireless devices were seen.

.4 AV Systems 3/5 - - - NA

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 3/5 0 M 0 Clock/PA is a newer system, installed in the last 10 years.

.2 Fire Alarm (Devices, Appliances)

3/5 0 M 0 Fire alarm has proper coverage in the building. Fire alarm panel is located in basement of building.

.3 Access, Intrusion, Security

3/5 0 M 0 Building has a mixture of door contacts and cameras. System was installed in the last 10 years.


Equipment Location:3/5 4 M 4 Electrical panel is located in Janitors closet. Panel does not

have proper clearance..2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 0 M 0 Panels look in relatively good shape..3 Receptacles / Branch

Circuiting3/5 0 M 0 Receptacle quantity appears to be sufficient.

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 4 M 4 Fixtures were in bad condition. Fixtures should be replaced

with linear fluorescents.

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 3/5 4 HP 4 Fixtures were in bad condition. Fixtures should be replaced with linear fluorescents.

.3 Controls 3/5 0 M 0 Rooms had switch only. Switches were in ok condition.

.4 Controls:Efficiency

3/5 4 HP 2 Controls should be upgraded to occupancy sensors.

.5 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 - - - NA

Building - Toilet Building


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 3/5 0 M 0 Main IDF is located in building and in good shape..2 Infrastructure (Raceway,


.3 Workstation / Wireless 3/5 0 M 0 Building has sufficient data connections.


4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 3/5 - - - NA.2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)3/5 0 M 0 Fire alarm system has proper coverage and is an automatic

system. Main fire alarm panel is located in building.


3/5 - - - NA


Equipment Location:3/5 4 C 4 Main electrical room is located in building.

Room is used for storage and blocking clearance of switchgear.

.2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 4 C 4 Electrical panel does not have proper clearance.


3/5 0 M 0 Building receptacle quantity looks sufficient.

.4 Other 3/5 4 C 4 Equipment under kitchen hood is not on a shunt trip breaker or connected to fire alarm system.

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 0 M 0 Lighting was adequate for space.

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 3/5 0 M 0 Lighting fixtures were acceptable for space

.3 Controls 3/5 4 HP 3 Building had only switches for controls. Occupancy sensors should be added to building.


3/5 4 HP 3 Building had only switches for controls. Occupancy sensors should be added to building.

Building - Multipurpose


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.5 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 0 M 0 Exit signs and egress lighting were seen.

3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 3/5 NA.2 Infrastructure (Raceway,




.5 Other

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 3/5 0 M 0 Standard clock speaker combinations were located..2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)3/5 0 M 0 Fire alarm coverage was per code.


3/8 0 M 0 Building had motion detector and door contacts sufficient for building.



.2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 0 M 0 Electrical Panels looked in good condition with adequate spare breakers.


3/5 0 M 0 Building receptacle locations and quantities seem acceptable. Building has been provided with surface raceway for additional device locations.

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 0 M 0 Building had 3-lamp T8 recessed fixtures.

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 3/5 4 HP 1 To be a CHIPS classroom, new fixtures would need to be provided.

.3 Controls 3/5 4 C 1 Lighting controlled by switches and occupancy sensors.


3/5 4 HP 2 Controls are not per chips standards. Additional switching, occupancy sensors with proper coverage and daylighting is required.

.5 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 4 C 4 No exit signs or egress lighting was seen.





Building - Classroom Building


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



Appliances)3/5 0 M 0 Classroom detectors and horns/strobes appear to be per

current code..3 Access, Intrusion,

Security3/5 0 M 0 Classrooms had a motion detector in all rooms.



.2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 0 M 0 Electrical system looks in good shape.


3/5 0 M 0 Building receptacle locations and quantities seem acceptable.

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 0 M 0 Building had 3-lamp T8 surface mounted fixtures. Fixtures

looked in good condition..2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 3/5 4 HP 3 To meet CHIPS standards, fixtures would need to be replaced.

.3 Controls 3/5 4 C 4 Lighting was controlled by turning breakers off.


3/5 4 HP 2 New switches, occupancy sensors and daylight sensors should be added to building.

.5 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 - - - NA





4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 3/5 0 M 0 Clock and speaker combination observed and are in working

condition.

Building - Portable 7A


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.2 Fire Alarm (Devices, Appliances)

3/5 0 M 0 Building had smoke detectors and horns.


3/5 0 M 0 Motion sensors observed.



.2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 0 M 0 Electrical system look in good shape.


3/5 0 M 0 Building receptacle locations and quantities seem acceptable.

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 0 M 0 Building had 3-lamp recessed fixtures.


.3 Controls 3/5 4 C 2 Lighting controlled by switches only.


3/5 4 HP 2 Controls are not per CHIPS standards. Additional switching, occupancy sensors and daylighting is required.

.5 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 4 C 4 Two door classrooms did not have exit signs or egress lighting. Per current code, rooms should have both.





4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 3/5 0 M 0 Clock and speaker combination observed and in working

condition..2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)3/5 0 M 0 Building had smoke detectors and horns.





.2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 0 M 0 Electrical system has been replaced in the last 10 years.


3/5 0 M 0 Building receptacle locations and quantities seem acceptable. Building has been provide with surface raceway for additional device locations.

Building - Portable 7B

Building - Portable 7C


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re


.4 Other

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 4 M 2 Building had pendent hung fixtures in need of replacement.


.3 Controls 3/5 0 M 0 Lighting controlled by switches only.

.4 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 4 HP 2 Controls are not per CHIPS standards. Additional switching, occupancy sensors and daylighting is required.

.5 Other 3/5 4 C 4 Two door classrooms did not have exit signs or egress lighting. Per current code, rooms should have both.





4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 3/5 0 M 0 Clock and speaker combination observed and in working

condition..2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)3/5 0 M 0 Building had smoke detectors and horns.





.2 Panels and Gear: 3/5 0 M 0 Electrical Panels looked in good condition with adequate spare breakers.

Building - Kindergarten


Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re



3/5 0 M 0 Building receptacle locations and quantities seem acceptable. Building has been provided with surface raceway for additional device locations.

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 3/5 0 M 0 Building had 3-lamp T8 recessed fixtures.


.3 Controls 3/5 4 C 1 Lighting controlled by switches and occupancy sensors.


3/5 4 HP 2 Controls are not per CHIPS standards. Additional switching, occupancy sensors with proper coverage and daylighting is required.

.5 Life Safety / Egress 3/5 4 C 4 No exit signs or egress lighting was seen.






Appliances)3/5 0 M 0 Classroom detectors and horns/strobes appear to be per

current code..3 Access, Intrusion,

Security3/5 0 M 0 Classrooms had a motion detector in all rooms.


Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints


LEI1.1 District Level Commitment

2 1 Intent: Gain access to high performance tools and resources and integrate high performance goals into district planning.

LEI1.2 Integrated Design 2 0 Intent : Reduce or eliminate potable water use for landscape irrigation.

LEI2.0 Educational Display P P Intent: Increase the school community’s knowledge about the basics of high performance design using an educational display to serve as a three-dimensional textbook.

LEI2.1 Demonstration Areas 1 0 Intent: Provide students, teachers and staff with more in-depth knowledge for each aspect of high performance design on their school site, including sustainable sites, water conservation, energy and material efficiency, and indoor environmental quality.

LEI3.1 Innovation 4 0 Intent: Test, understand and implement innovative approaches to improving the health of school occupants and the performance of school facilities.

LE3.2 Design for Adaptability, Durability and Disassembly

4 0 Intent: Reduce building material waste and promote local building material reuse during construction, renovation, repurposing of space, and disassembly. Provide spaces that are adaptable, durable, and flexible. Drive innovation in designing schools to support disassembly and reuse..



CHPS SUMMARY: LEADERSHIP, EDUCATION & INNOVATION

Credit # / Title

2. Schools as Learning Tools

1. Leadership

3. Innovation

CHPS- Leadership, Education & Innovation: Summary

CHPS Summary: Leadership, Education and Innovation: Page 67 of 73



The Charter School program at Thomas Jefferson Elementary School supports a unique learning environment for it’s students and families. At this time there has been no programmatic requests made to optimize the

facilities to support it’s educational needs.

Leadership, Education Innovation: Page 68 of 73

Code & Life Safety

Maintenance & Operations

High Performance Transformation

Total Includes: C, M/O & HP

1. School Entry/Drop Off $245,960 $76,310 $109,460 $431,7302. Parking & Drives $105,690 $81,900 $21,190 $208,7803. Service Access $1,820 $42,770 $2,600 $47,1904. Outdoor Activity $386,880 $1,845,220 $143,650 $2,375,7505. Campus Core $89,050 $125,970 $63,440 $278,4606. Utilities / Infrastructure $379,080 $0 $0 $379,080

SS Total $1,208,480 $2,172,170 $340,340 $3,720,990

1. Site Utilities / Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $02. Plumbing Systems $28,210 $11,570 $42,250 $82,0303. Specialty Systems $0 $0 $0 $04. Fire Protection Systems $0 $0 $0 $0

WE Total $28,210 $11,570 $42,250 $82,030

1. Central Plant $0 $0 $0 $02. HVAC Systems $88,790 $179,920 $16,770 $285,4803. Specialty Systems $0 $0 $0 $04. Alternative Energy $0 $0 $0 $0

EA Total $88,790 $179,920 $16,770 $285,480

1. Signage $27,560 $0 $0 $27,5602. Door Hardware $37,050 $0 $0 $37,0503. Interior Finishes $235,170 $586,690 $931,710 $1,753,5704. Exterior Finishes $0 $264,420 $333,190 $597,610

MR Total $299,780 $851,110 $1,264,900 $2,415,790

1. Electrical Systems $57,720 $8,190 $0 $65,9102. Lighting Systems $32,890 $23,270 $346,320 $402,4803. Technology Systems $0 $0 $0 $04. Low Voltage Systems $0 $0 $0 $0

IEQ Total $90,610 $31,460 $346,320 $468,390

IE Total $0 $0

Code & Life Safety

Maintenance & Operations

High PerformanceTotal per School

Total per Category $1,715,870 $3,246,230 $2,010,580 $6,972,680

1. Career & College Ready Transformation2. Family & Community Engagement3. Organizational Transformation

SUSTAINABLE SITES (SS)

ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE (EA)

WATER EFFICIENCY (WE)


TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (IEQ)

INNOVATION & EDUCATION (IE)

MATERIALS & RESOURCES (MR)

Cost Summary: Page 69 of 73

Thomas Jefferson Elementary SchoolHigh Performance Facility Assessment

Appendix: Page 70 of 73

Appendix: Page 71 of 73

assessment summary - thomas jefferson...thomas jefferson elementary school was built in 1963. a...

Documents