assessment update report to the university senate 3 october 2006

9
Assessment Update Assessment Update Report to the University Senate Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006 3 October 2006

Upload: adelia-hudson

Post on 16-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

Assessment UpdateAssessment Update

Report to the University SenateReport to the University Senate

3 October 20063 October 2006

Page 2: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

2

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost Why Assess?

TO CERTIFYINDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT

TO IMPROVEPROGRAMS

TO BEACCOUNTABLE

Page 3: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

3

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost

AssessingTo Certify Achievement

Individualized evaluations

Course grades

Constructs like credit-hours and GPA

Aptitude and entrance exams

Direct observations of competency (e.g., swim test)

Page 4: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

4

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost

AssessingTo Improve Programs

Working agreement about program purposes or outcomes

Isolation of a few outcomes for observation

Feedback about “what happens, really” as students work toward those purposes

Adjustments to program in light of assessment evidence

Page 5: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

5

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost SACS Standards

1993 SACS Recommendation

Must begin to assess student learning

2004 SACS Commendation

Praise for AU assessment efforts so far

2013 SACS __________?

Evidence that assessment infuses all key teaching and learning processes

Page 6: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

6

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost

AssessingTo Show Accountability

How well are we doing, institutionally?

COMPARED TO WHAT?

Past emphasis on input variables (e.g., mean ACT)

New models are devoting increasing attention to

Key educational processes Key learning goals

Page 7: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

7

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost Spellings Commission

Postsecondary education institutions should measure and report meaningful student learning outcomes.

Colleges should measure the growth of student learning taking place

Students and the public should have access to aggregate summary data about student learning

Page 8: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

8

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost

The CollegiateLearning Assessment

CLA is a national assessment to measure some essential academic abilities like

Analysis Critical thinking Written communication

Uses performance tasks based on realistic problems

Requires students to read, analyze, assimilate information and write

Page 9: Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006

9

Office of the ProvostOffice of the Provost

The National Surveyof Student Engagement

Data about the impact of college on students in

Acquiring a broad general education Acquiring work-related knowledge and skills Writing clearly and effectively Using computing and information technology Working effectively with others Other outcomes of college

National and peer comparisons possible