assessment work rpt robbie lake prop geophys survey

-s *y Od ci' J:^

J, fe ^f

Rubicon Minerals Corporation

ASSESSMENT WORK REPORT OCTOBER, 1997

ROBBIE LAKE PROPERTYGEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

Burrows and Cabot TownshipsLarder Lake M ining Division

Latitude 47'45'N Longitude 81" 25'W

NTS: 41P/11 and 41P/14

Submitted by: Delta Geoscience Ltd. Jared Strokon, B.Se. Ladislav Zabo, M.Se. Octobers, 1997

41P14SW0015 2.17858 BURROWS 010

Table of Contents

Summary................................................................................................................................. i

I.0 Scope and Purpose............................................................................................................... 12.0 Logistics .............................................................................................................. 13.0 Property Description ............................................................................................................. 14.0 Location and Access .......................................................................................................... 35.0 Previous Work..................................................................................................................... 36.0 Physiography and Vegetation................................................................................... 57.0 Equipment ........................................................................................................... 58.0 Data Presentation.................................................................................................................. 59.0 Survey Procedure... .............................................................................................. 5

9.1 Robbie Lake Grid ................................................................................................ 59.2 Old Cominco Grid ............................................................................................... 6

10.0 Discussion of Data ................. .............................................................................. 610.1 Robbie Lake Grid ............................................................................................... 610.2 Old Cominco Grid ......,........................................................................................ 6

II.0 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 712.0 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 7

TablesTable 1 - Claim Schedule, Robbie Lake Property....................................................................... 1Table 2 - Summary of Previous Exploration, Robbie Lake Property Area................................... 4

References................................................................................................................................... 8Certificates of Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 9,10

Maps and IllustrationsFigure 1 - Location b C laim Map ........................................................................................... 2Figure 2 - Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Plan, Posted Values................................................ in pocketFigure 3 - Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Plan, Contour.................................................. in pocketFigure 4 - Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Section, Posted Values. 6600E............................ in pocketFigure 5 - Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Section, Contour, 6600E..................................... in pocketFigures- Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Section, Posted Values, 6700E............................ in pocketFigure 7 - Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Section, Contour, 6700E..................................... in pocketFigure 8- Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Section, Posted Values, 6800E............................ in pocketFigure 9 - Robbie Lake Grid, Chargeability Section, Contour, 6800E..................................... in pocketFigure 10 - Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Plan, Posted Values................................ in pocketFigure 11 - Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Plan, Contour......................................... in pocketFigure 12 - Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Posted Values, 6600E.................. in pocketFigure 13 - Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Contour, 6600E.......................... in pocketFigure 14- Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Posted Values, 6700E.................. in pocketFigure 15 - Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Contour, 6700E.......................... in pocketFigure 16 - Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Posted Values, 6800E.................. in pocketFigure 17 - Robbie Lake Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Contour, 6800E.......................... in pocketFigure 18 - Old Cominco Grid, Chargeability Plan, Posted Values........................................ in pocketFigure 19-Old Cominco Grid, Chargeability Plan, Contour................................................ in pocketFigure 20 - Old Cominco Grid, Chargeability Section, Posted Values, 1600E.......................... in pocketFigure 21 - Old Cominco Grid, Chargeability Section, Contour, 1600E.................................. in pocketFigure 22 - Old Cominco Grid, Apparent Resistivity Plan, Posted Values............................... in pocketFigure 23 - Old Cominco Grid, Apparent Resistivity Plan, Contour........................................ in pocketFigure 24 - Old Cominco Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Posted Values, 1600E................. in pocketFigure 25 - Old Cominco Grid, Apparent Resistivity Section, Contour, 1600E......................... in pocket

41P14SW0015 2.17858 BURROWS 010C

SUMMARY

Rubicon Minerals Corporation, Suite 888, 1100 Melville Street, Vancouver, V6E 4A6, holds title to 18 unpatented claims (240 units) known as the Robbie Lake property. The property covers 3,840 hectares and is located 80 kilometres south of Timmins in the Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario.

From September 23 to October 4, 1997, Rubicon Minerals Corporation conducted a gradient-array induced polarization survey on three claims within its Robbie Lake property. The work was part of a larger ground geophysical program centred around several clusters of untested airborne EM anomalies identified by the company in an OGS Open File Report. This, in conjunction with previous prospecting work carried out by the company, suggested that geophysical surveys would be an important step in defining the geology and localizing prospective areas.

Based on the work completed for Rubicon by Delta Geophysics, several areas of sulphide potential have been identified.

A program of additional gradient-array IP is recommended. This program should assist in determining the depth extent and spatial continuity of these anomalous zones.

1.0 SCOPE AND PURPOSE

From September 23 to October 4, 1997, Rubicon Minerals Corporation conducted an exploration field program on a portion (five claims) of its Robbie Lake property. A grid was established and geophysical surveys (mag, EM and IP) conducted on the southwest portion of the property. This report describes the results of the IP portion of the geophysical program, presents the data and makes recommendations for follow-up work.

2.0 LOGISTICS

A gradient-array induced polarization survey was completed on the property by a four-person crew, based near Lake Matagami. Access to the survey area was possible by four-wheel drive truck rented from National Tilden, Timmins Airport. This work was conducted by Ladislav Zabo (Geophysical Technician) and Shane Dench (Geophysical Technician) of Delta Geoscience Ltd., 852 Tsawwassen Beach Rd, Delta, BC, V4M 2J3, and assisted by Fred Blake and Robert Comstock (independent contractors). All data generated are presented at a scale of 1:5000 and are attached to this report.

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

The property consists of 18 unpatented mining claims in 240 contiguous units covering a total area of 3,840 hectares. Claim data are summarized in Table 1. A property map is shown in Figure 1.

Seventeen claims are owned 100 07o by Rubicon Minerals Corporation, Suite 888 -1100 Melville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4A6. Rubicon holds title to the remaining claim (16 units) through an option agreement with Fred Blake, PO Box 187, Temagami, Ontario, POH 2HO.

The current report discloses geotechnical (geophysical survey) work conducted on two 16-unit claims (1211544 and 1223331) and one 15-unit claim (1223332) Burrows and Cabot Townships.

Table 1 - Claim Schedule, Robbie Lake Property Rubicon Minerals Corporation

| Townshipi

l Burrows\ Burrows| Burrowsl Burrowsl Burrowsi Burrowsl Burrows/Cabot| Cabot\ Burrows/Cabott Burrows/Cabot

Claim Number(s)

1205977120632312063241211550-121155112115441212112-121211712121261212127-12121281223331-12233321223334

Claim Units

4161618168716213115

Recorded Holder

RubiconRubiconRubiconRubiconRubiconRubiconRubiconRubiconRubiconRubicon

Date of RecordingOct.31/96Nov. 14/95Oct.31/96Oct. 18/95Oct. 18/95Oct.31/96Feb.29/96Feb.29/96Oct. 18/95Oct. 18/95

Expiry Date

Oct.31/98 iNov. 14/97Oct.31/98Oct. "i 8/97Oct. 18/97Oct.31/98Mar. 1/98Mar.1/98Oct. 18/97Oct. 18/97

Total Claims 18 Total Units 240

LEGEND

Rowe ri i ne

Drainage Lake

A/ TownshipBURROWS TP

1000 1000 2000 Meters

Rubicon Minerals CorporationRobbie Lake Property

LOCATION S CLAIM MAP

FIGURE: 1

3.0 LOCATION and ACCESS

The property is located in the Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario, 80 kilometres south of Timmins (Figure'1). The claim area straddles the boundary of Cabot and Burrows Townships, and one contiguous claim is located in the extreme southwest corner of Kemp Township. Geographic co-ordinates of the property centre are approximately latitude 470 45' N and longitude 81 0 25' W.

Timmins is located in northeastern Ontario, approximately 300 kilometres north of Sudbury and 600 kilometres north of Toronto (Figure 1). The Timmins area is serviced by all-weather paved highway and by scheduled airline or bus service from North Bay, Sudbury and Toronto.

The property is accessed via Highway 560, ten kilometers northeast of Shining Tree and thence by a gravel road (the Grassy River Road) for a distance of 36 kilometres north from Highway 560. The property can also be accessed by the Papakameka Road south from Timmins, a d istance of approximately 100 kilometres.

4.0 PREVIOUS WORK

A review of government publications and assessment work filed at the Larder Lake MNDM office shows that the area staked by Rubicon has been under-explored. It has been suggested that this may be due to a combination of limited outcrop and a lack of historical mapping (Rogers, 1995).

On a regional basis, the area had been sporadically mapped from 1899 to 1933 (Carter, 1986).

An area currently within Rubicon claims 1212114 and 1212115 has been explored in the past. During 1957, Paymaster Consolidated Mines Ltd. completed a program of airborne EM and ground mag surveys, mapping and drilling of three holes. A narrow intersection containing up to 3.77 g/t Au was reported (Rogers, 1995). Immediately north of this area, Amax Potash Ltd. conducted ground mag, EM and geochem surveys, mapping and diamond drilling (two holes) from 1971 to 1972. A bedrock Cu/Pb/Zn geochem anomaly was outlined with this work.

An airborne geophysical survey conducted for The Hanna Mining Company in 1975 lead to the staking of 18 unpatented claims in an area of Burrows and Cabot Townships underlain by two EM/mag anomalies, currently covered by Rubicon claims 1212126, 1223331, 1223332 and 1223334. In 1976, Hanna Mining undertook a program of ground geophysics (EM and mag) and mapping, followed by diamond drilling. Three holes were drilled (one abandoned) to test the two EM anomalies, which were concluded to be the result of graphite. However, minor zincblende and chalcopyrite were noted in intermediate tuff immediately north of a graphitic zone in CB-76-1A and two 5 to 6 foot sections of core assayed Q.18% Zn and rj.04% Cu. A 6.5 foot section in CB-76-2 returned .005 oz/t Au and Q.50% Zn (Muhic, 1976).

Based on geophysical and geological surveys completed between 1981 and 1983, Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. drilled five holes in an area located in Rubicon claims 1212115 (two holes), 1212113, 1212117 and 1206323 and reported values of Q.60% Zn\0.61 metres and 0.4907oZn\1.22 metres (B-83-1). This location had previously been surveyed by Prospectors Airways Co. Ltd. in 1962 when ground mag and EM programs were conducted.

During 1991, Cominco Limited conducted ground EM and mag surveys over a 15-claim portion of their property currently within Rubicon claims 1223332 and 1223334. Two conductive anomalies were outlined but apparently not pursued.

In 1995, Rubicon Minerals staked a core set of claims in Burrows and Cabot Townships, followed by further staking in 1996. Initial prospecting located a large angular chalcopyrite-bearing piece of float on claim 1223331 (MacVeigh, 1997). Rubicon subsequently conducted a two-phase program of ground geophysics in 1996 and 1997.

As noted by Rogers (1995), the area hosts numerous untested AEM anomalies, a favourable geological environment and a number of mineral deposits.

A summary of previous work in the Robbie Lake area is presented in Table 2.

Year

Table 2 - Summary of Previous Exploration, Robbie Lake Property Area

1957 Paymaster Consolidated

1962 Prospectors Airways1971 Amax Potash1972 Amax Potash

1975 Hanna Mining Company

1976 Hanna Mining Company1976 Hanna Mining Company1976 Hanna Mining Company

1981-83 Newmont1983-83 Newmont

1991 Cominco1995 Rubicon

1996-97 Rubicon

Work Done Area of Propertyairborne EM, ground mag, mapping, Burrows, Kemp Townshipdiamond drilling (3 holes)ground mag and JEMground magground EM, geochem, mapping,diamond drilling (2 holes)airborne EM and mag

Burrows Township Burrows Township Burrows Township

ground EM and maggeological mappingdiamond drilling, 3 holes (1holeabandoned)ground geophysics, mappingdiamond drilling, 5 holesground EM and magprospectingground EM and mag

Burrows, Cabot, KempTownshipsBurrows, Cabot TownshipsBurrows, Cabot TownshipsBurrows, Cabot Townships

Burrows Township Burrows Township Burrows Township Burrows, Cabot Townships Burrows, Cabot Townships

6.0 PHYSIOGRAPHY and VEGETATION

Most of the area is covered by thick glacial deposits; eskers, kames, and reworked (windblown) glacial deposits which are spotted with glacial carved lakes and potholes. Low outcrop areas ^1 07o) occur in the eastern and northwestern part of claim 1223331, on the north boundary of claim 1211550, and on claims 1212126 and 1206323. Outcrop is more prevalent in the most recently staked eastern part of the prop erty but is still less than 3 0xb.

The entire area was burned by an extensive fire in late 1950. As a result of a major replanting program in the 1960s the area now boasts a healthy growth of redpine, whitepine, jackpine and spruce. The deciduous forest component is poplar and birch. Hazelbrush and aider are the dominant undergrowth.

7.0 EQUIPMENT

* 1 IP-6 BHGM Receiver (Iris Instruments, France)* 1 VIP 4000 BRGM Transmitter (Iris Instruments, France)* 1 Honda 6.5 kW motor generator* 1 NEC Versa 2000 field computer

8.0 DATA PRESENTATION

The chargeability and apparent resistivity data for Robbie Lake and Old Cominco grids are presented in black-and-white posted value and contoured plan format with idealized grid coordinates. Chargeability and apparent resistivity sections for detailed areas are also presented as black-and-white posted value and contour maps.

Contour Intervals: Robbie Lake Grid: Chargeability Plan k Sections - Y2 ms (Figures 2 to 9)Apparent Resistivity Plan - 2000 ohm-m (Figures 10 and 11) Apparent Resistivity Sections - 500 ohm-m (Figures 12 to 17)

Old Cominco Grid: Chargeability Plan Si Section - Vz m s (Figures 18 to 21)Apparent Resistivity Plan - 500 ohm-m (Figures 22 and 23) Apparent Resistivity Section - 100 ohm-m (Figures 24 and 25)

9.0 SURVEY PROCEDURE

9.1 ROBBIE LAKE GRID

The Robbie Lake Grid lines were established on these claims with a bearing of 324 degrees. The lines, going from 4750N to 6000N, are spaced 100 metres apart, and are tied together by a baseline at 5000N. Station spacing is 25 metres.

The primary survey was conducted using a 1650 metre current dipole (AB) with a 50 metre receiver dipole (D). The grid was surveyed in two blocks, overlapping at line 7000E. The current dipole electrodes were set up on lines 6800E and 7200E with block centre stations at 5375N. Detailing was conducted with 1100 metre and 600 metre current clipoles, and block centres at 5300N. A 50 metre receiver dipole was used for the 1100 metre AB and a 25 metre receiver dipole was used for the 600 metre AB.

A total of 16.2 line kilometres was surveyed (includes detailing and overlap).

9.2 OLD COMINCO GRID

The bearing of the Old Cominco Grid lines is 360 degrees, with lines going from 400S to TOON. Line separation was 200 metres, and data was taken at 25 metre intervals along these lines.

The initial survey was conducted using a 1 650 metre current dipole (AB) on line 1600E with a 50 metre receiver dipole (D). The block centre station was 150N. Detailing was conducted with 1100 metre and 600 metre current dipoles, and block centres at 250N. A 50 metre receiver dipole was used for the 1100 metre AB and a 25 metre receiver dipole was used for the 600 metre AB.

A total of 4.2 line kilometres was surveyed (includes detailing).

10.0 DISCUSSION OF THE DATA

A gradient-array induced polarization (IP) survey defines the areas in which mineralization may exist. Chargeability and apparent resistivity are two significant rock properties which can be determined from an IP survey. Chargeability, the rock's ability to hold an electric charge, is measured in miliseconds (ms). This is the average time over which the current within the rock decays to zero. Apparent resistivity is a measure of the rock's ability to pass an electric current through it. This is measured in ohm-metres (ohm-m), a product of the average resistance of the rock mass and its thickness. From a mineral exploration aspect, areas where high chargeability values are associated with low apparent resistivities typically indicate the presence of sulphides.

10.1 ROBBIE LAKE GRID

The variation of chargeabilities over the grid is approximately from O ms to 12 ms, with a general trend of 75 degrees to grid North (Figures 2 and 3). The largest area of high chargeability values is located between 51 SON and 5450N on lines 6600E through 6900E. Other areas of high chargeability are located on the South ends of lines 6900E through 7400E.

Apparent resistivities range from approximately 700 ohm-m to 121000 ohm-m (Figures 10 and 11). High apparent resistivity values dominate the southern part of the grid, not extending beyond the baseline (5000N), possibly outlining the contact between the highly resistive bedrock and the overburden. The values on the remainder of the grid are uniform, with apparent resistivities below 3000 ohm-m.

Sections extending from a depth of 99 metres to 272 metres have been created for lines 6600E through 6800E, centred around 5300N (Figures 4 to 9 and 12 to 17). The chargeability sections suggest a thickening of the target with increasing depth. The apparent resistivity sections show little variation, suggesting uniformly resistive overburden.

10.2 OLD COMINCO GRID

The variation of chargeabilities over the grid is approximately from -2 ms to 26 ms (Figures 18 and 19). Two areas of high chargeability values are centred around 150N on line 1600E and 275S on line 1400E.

Apparent resistivities range from approximately 100 ohm-m to 13600 ohm-m (Figures 22 and 23). High apparent resistivity values dominate the south-eastern part of the grid. Increased apparent resistivities (4000 to 5000 ohm-m) are also present on the north-eastern section of the grid. Low apparent resistivities are present between lines 1400E and 1600E centered at 275S. A second zone of low apparent resistivity extends across the grid centered around 325N

The section extending from a depth of 99 metres to 272 metres has been created for line 1600E with block center at 250N (Figures 20, 21, 24 and 25). The chargeability and apparent resistivity sections indicate a n arrow, almost vertical anomaly centered on 250N.

11.0 CONCLUSIONS

The gradient-array IP survey of Robbie Lake and Old Cominco grids outlined several significant areas of high chargeability and low apparent resistivity, indicating the sulphide potential of this property.

12.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Further investigation of these areas will provide further insight into the depth extent and spatial continuity of the anomalous zones identified in this survey. A continuing program of gradient-array induced polarization is recommended. Recommended work is summarized below.

(1) Increased current dipole length (AB) for the purpose of determining the depth extent of the anomalous zone.

(2) Extension of the Old Cominco Grid to the south-west for detailed investigation of the anomaly identified in the south-west corner.

REFERENCES

Bowen, R.P.1983: A drilling program for assessment work credit on the Newmont claim groups in Burrows and

Kemp Townships, Ontario; Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd., 59p.

Carter, M.W.1987: Geology of the Shining Tree Area, Districts of Sudbury and Timiskaming; Ontario Geological

Survey Report 240, 48p. Accompanied by Map 2510, scale 1:50,000. 1986: Geology of Cabot and Kelvin Townships, District of Sudbury; Ontario Geological Survey Report

249, 52p. Accompanied by Map 2470, scale 1:31,680 (1 inch to V* m ile). 1976: Cabot Township, District of Sudbury; Ontario Div. Mines, Prelim. Map P. 1104, Geol. ser. scale

1:15,840 or 1 inch to V* m ile. Geology 1975.

Lambert, G. and Turcotte, R.1991: Geophysical survey, Property of Cominco Limited, Burro Project, Burrows Township; Val d'Or

Geophysique, 12p.

Lovell, H.L., de Grijs, Jan and Ploeger, F.1977: Burrows Township, District of Sudbury; Ontario Geological Survey, Prelim. Map P. 1218,

Kirkland Lake Data Series, scale 1:15,840 or 1 inch to Vi mile. Data compiled 1973, 1976.

MacVeigh, J.G.1997: Assessment Work Report, October 1995, Robbie Lake Property, Prospecting and Surface

Sampling; Rubicon Minerals Corporation, 20p.

Muhic, J.F.1976: Diamond drilling report on Cabot-Burrows Property, Shining Tree Project; The Hanna Mining

Company, 23p. 1976: Geological report on Cabot-Burrows Property, Shining Tree Project; The Hanna Mining

Company, 5p.

Ontario Geological Survey1990: Airborne electromagnetic and total intensity magnetic survey, Shining Tree area; Ontario

Geological Survey, Map 81410, Scale 1:31,680. 1990: Airborne electromagnetic and total intensity magnetic survey, Shining Tree area; Ontario







Geological Survey, Map 81417, Scale 1:20,000.

Rogers, M.C.1995: A geological and exploration data compilation and a mineral resource assessment of the

Grassy River area; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5930, 44p.

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

l, Ladislav Zabo declare that:

1) l have received a B.Sc. (Mons) Geomorphology from Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia in 1988.

2) l have received a M.Se. degree in Groundwater Hydrology from the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario in 1995.

3) l supervised and conducted the IP survey work described in this report, and also participated in preparation of this report.

4) l have worked in the Geophysics field in Canada, the United States and Mexico since April 1996.

5) l am an employee of Delta Geoscience Ltd., 852 Tsawwassen Beach Road, Delta, B.C., V4M 2J3 since April 1996.

Date:Ladislav Zabo, M. Se.

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

l, Jared Strokon declare that:

1) l have received a B.Se. Geophysics from The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC in 1997.

2) l have been a member of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society since 1995.

3) l have worked on the data processing and presentation for this report.

4) l have worked in the Geophysics field in Canada, the United States and Mexico since May 1997.

5) l am an employee of Delta Geoscience Ltd., 852 Tsawwassen Beach Road, Delta, B.C., V4M 2J3 since May 1997.

Jared S^rDate: O*CT.

10

z00

CD

ZoooCD

ZooCDLD

Zoo00

zooLO

zooCDLO

zo0LDLD

Z0om

z0oLO

zooCMLO

Z0oLO

z00sz0oCD

z0o00

z00

"t

6600E 6800E 70QOE 7200E 7400E1 l 1 1 1

r. N. -

-

-

-

-

.

'

.

-

.

-

-

-

-

^- -

-

-

.

—

-

-

.

— —

-

-

.

— —

-

-

-

-

-

-

.

-

-

-

.

— —

-.

.

-

'

- -

J

^7 \v73.6

3.7

3.3

3.3

3.5

3.6

3.8

3.7

3.9

4.0

3.9

3.8

3.8

4.4

4.3

4.4

4.3

4.0

3.9

4.5

4.4

4.5

4.1

4.2

4.8

7.0

7.8

4.0

4.4

4.8

•9.6

•9.3

4.0

4.0

6.5

4.0

3.8

3.1

3.3

3.5

3.2

4. J

3.8

3.4

3.4

3.0

3.1

3.9

4.2

4.5

3.1

3.1

3.3

3.5

3.2

3.3

3. B

3.7

3.6

3.8

3.7

3.7

3.7

4.1

4.1

4.2

3.6

4.1

4.3

4.2

4.3

4.5

4.6

4.9

4.7

4.6

4.7

7.5

4.6

H0.2

4.8

•9.5

4.0

-7.7

4.5

4.9

4.3

4.B

4.2

4.2

4.6

4.3

4.1

4.4

4.0

3.8

4.1

4.5

4.1

4.7

4.1

3.7

2.0 N^

2.9 NV -

3.2 X -

3.7

3.8

3.6

3.7

4.6

3.5

4.2

3.3

4.4

43.2

4.2

-2.2

-0.9

4.6

4.8

4.0

4.2

4.9

4.4

4.6

4.8

7.4

4.5

4.7

7.9

4.6

4.1

-7.4

4.9

4.3

4.1

4.2

4.9

4.2

4.4

4.3

5.0

4.9

4.0

4.7

4.7

4.9

4.4

4.7

4.1

4.8

4.8

4.1

3.3

3.3

3.4

3.6^v

3.5 N.

3.5 N. -N

3.6

3.7

3.6

4.0

4.5

3.8

3.6

-3.9

4.0

3.7

4.1

4.3 :

4.4

4.1

4.5

4.8

4.2

4.2

4.3

4.5

4.6

4.6

4.4

4.5

4.2

4.2

4.6

4.4

4.6

4.6

4.9

4.0

4.4

4.]

4.5

4.4

4.8

4.3

5.1

4.0

4.0

4.9

3.6

4.0

4.7

3.6 4- 4- -

3.9

2.9

2.9

2.6

2.9

3.2

3.1 \N.

3.2 \N.

3.3 -

3.0

3.0

J.2

3.1

3.0

2.9

1.2

3.3

4.9

4.8

5.1

5.3

5.7

5.7

5.5

5.5

5.4

5.1

4.6

3.9

3,9

3.7

3.4

3.6

3.6

3.6

3.5

3.5

4.1

4.7

4.6

*,4

4.3

4.6

4.9

4.3

4.4

4.6

4.4

4.3

4.9

1.7

2.6

2.9

2.8

2.9

2.9

2.8

2.9

2.9\

3.2 N.v

3.1 N-

3.2

2.7

3.0

3.3

3.0

4.1

5.3

5.9

6.2

6.3

6. B

6.4

5.6

5.0

5.1

4.4

4.0

4.0

4.0

3.8

3.9

4.0

3. B

3.5

3.4

4.0

4.4

4.5

4.7

4.4

4.5

4.9

4.6

4.0

4.1

4.7

4.5

4.3

2.6

2.6

t.e

2.7

2.8

2.8

2.8

2.7

2.9

3.0

i.a3.0

2.1 N.

3.6 N. -\

4.0

4.2

5.0

5.7

5.9

5.7

S.6

5.2

5.0

4.5

1.6

0.0

i.4

t.O

0.3

6.8

*.2

5.3

2.9

3.6

3.9

i.9

•1.5

3.3

3.4

•4.1

4.5

4.9

4.9

4.1

4.5

4.8

4.3

2.4

2.2

2.5

2.5

2.4

2.5

4.1

2.2

1.5

3.9

4.2

4.4

4.7

4.4

4.9

3.4 N.

3.0 N. -

3.8 ^-

4.4

7.0

4.7

5.8

4.2

4.8

4.5

4.5

4.7

4.S

4.5

3.9

4.7

3.2

3.9

4.2

4.3

4.1

4.1

4.3

4.8

4.3

4.7

4.0

2.6

2.6

2.6

2.5

2.9

3.2

2.7

3.0

3.5

3.8

3.4

4.4

3.8

3.5

4.1

4.4

4.6

4.8

5.1

4.6

5.0

5.2

5.5

4.8

4.6

5.0

•5.2

4.3

4.9

4.7

4.8

4.6

4.6

4.6

4.0

4.9

4.0

4.1

4.3

4.1

4.7

4.3

4.3 4- -

4.3

4.2

4.5

4.9 4- -

4.1

3.8

1 l 1 l 16600E 6800E 7000E 726oE 7400E

en— i.00zCDOO0Z

enCD

8 ^ .q W Q 5? 'P1z ®jp i! *C C^ Q^/ *^-^*?fe# ® "^*,aC^ — . ^

en "00O0z

en^*J

ooz

enCD0oz

eneno0z

•*- d

7en \ . 70 /ft/O /V v.

z /yen /fMOOZ

^ Scale 1:5000-- 100 0 100 200

2 (meters)

en00O

^ Figure 2to

^ R UBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONROBBIE LAKE GRID

S TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) g CHARGEABILITY VALUESz —————————————————————————————————————^ Chargeability in ms -J AB = 1650 m, D ^ 50 m , St. Spacing 25 mo BRGM IP-6 Instrumentz October 1997

DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD.

66QOE 6800E 70QOE 7200E 74QOE

o oCD

O O O CD

OOen

o o00

o o r^ in

o oCDin

o o in in

oSm

o oroin

o oCMm

o om

o o o m

o o en

o o00

o o

+

-J-

660OE OE 720 OE 740

eno o

en o o o

en CD O O

enCOo o

en \j o o

en -F* o oz

en OJo o

en ro o o

eno o

en o o o

CDo o

00o o

o

OE

100

Scale 1:5000O 100 200

(meters)

2.17858Figure 3

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONROBBIE LAKE GRID

TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) CHARGEABILITY PLAN MAP

Contour Interval 1/2 msAB ^ 1650 m, D = 50 m, St. Spacing 25 m

BRGM IP-6 InstrumentOctober 1997


2, 17858100

Scale 1:5000O 100 200

48,00 5000 52,00 5400 56,00 5800, (meters)O

O O

O OCN

O Oo

To

L

+

+

+

4800

T t T T+'T T t t T T T t+t Y T ? t

TTTTTtTTTTTtTTTTTTTTTTTT

TTTtTTTTYTtTtt'TVTTT TTTTTTTTTYTT

o o

JS1 o o

-o o

Figure 4

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONROBBIE LAKE GRID - LINE 6600E

TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) CHARGEABILITY VALUES

Chargeability in msMax. Depth 272 m


5000 5200 5400 5600 5800DELTA GEOSCIENCE LTD.

o

o o

ooCM

O O

4800

4800

)000 j 2,0 O 54,00

5000

+

5200 5400

5600

5600

5800 "o

o o

NJ O O

Oo

5800

100

Scale 1:5000O 100 200

(meters)

g.17858Figure 5


TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) CHARGEABILITY SECTION - LINE 6600E

Contour Interval 1/2 msMax. D epth 272 m



Scale 1 :5000O 100 200

48,00 5000 )200o

o o

o

V

o o

5400 5600 5800

r T T+T T T T T T T T+T T T T T -4-

o

YTTTTTTTTTTTTTTtTTTTTTTTT

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTrTTTTTTT

o

IroTOo

l 0 o

Figure 6

4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800



Chargeability in msMax. Depth 272 m



o

o o

ooCM

o o

4800

+

4800

50,00

5000

5200 5400

+

5200 5400

5600

5600

5800 "O

o o

O O

5800

100 200

(meters)

1785Figure 7



Contour Interval 1/2 msMax. D epth 272 m



480Cor

oo

o o

o o

+

5000 5600

.,

T T t+T t T T T t T t+T t T T T

M isj rsi -* -i

TTTTTTTrTTTTrTTTTTTTTTTTT

TTTrTTTTTTrTTTVTtTTTrfTTTTTTTTTTTTT

4800 5000 5200 5400 5600

5800,o

o o

C-J o o

5800

100

Scale 1 :5000O 100

(meters)

.17858Figure 8



Chargeability in msMax. D epth 272 m



o

o o

o oCN

O O

4800

4800

5000 5200 5400 56,00

500C 5200 5400 5600

5800 "o

oo

- oo

o o

5800

17^58100

Scale 1:5000 100 200

(meters)

Figure 9



Contour Interval 1/2 msMax. Depth 272 m



zooCD

ZoooCD

Zo o enin

zoo00m

zoom

z0oCDin

zooinin

z0om

zooin

zooCMm

z0om

zooom

z00en

z0o00

z00r-

6600E 6800E 7000E 7200E .'-K——— 1 —————————————— 1 —————————————— 1 —————————————— 1 ———————————— — '

— *x \ 7 ~* . o

--

---

- ----

—---

- —

---

—----

-.

— —

---

--.--.-

--.---

--

- -

J

^1052. ^ X 7/^

1387. *^7 N^ ^f\^

1509.

1622.

1664.

1681.

2002.

2543.

3464.

4193.

5330.

5885.

4561.

3464.

3272.

4023.

4508.

4605.

4084.

2985.

2474.

2456.

2262.

2094.

2150.

•2112.

•2105.

2066.

•2114.

1806.

-1943.

-2430.

4575.

4771.

•3227.

-4279.

4867.

-5254.

fiU1O041 .

7676.

•8571.

6662.

-4702.

r6927.

7513.

4203.

•8918.

•8941.

4836.

21817.

-46584.

44079.

•21788.

1819.

1838.

1716.

2040.

2389.

Z952.

3224.

3306.

3621.

3649.

3754.

3655.

3642.

3737.

4129.

3977.

4018.

4083.

3255.

3191.

3014.

2717.

2562.

2582.

2569.

2722.

4577.

2044.

-2196.

4619.

-2689.

3046.

3668.

4609.

5696.

6416.

7305.

7841.

8100.

8342.

6816.

7254.

8997.

•11660.

18081.

20239.

38073.

61627.

95134.

22775.

45027. J

2321. N.

2249. -

2597.

2841.

3186.

2988.

3346.

3493.

3152.

3007.

3032.

3053.

4876.

3859.

4211.

3991.

3647.

3523.

3443.

3623.

3293.

3425.

3345.

3265.

Z753.

2941.

2800.

2615.

2458.

2602.

3040.

3651.

4490.

5911.

6692.

7697.

9219.

10062.

11214.

11924.

43400.

15956.

20063.

29357.

47853.

7269*.

69993.

48130.

37493.

23610.

14393.

r2530. —

2683.

2763.

2953. N.

3175. \^-

3320.

3425.

3385.

3729.

3393.

3113.

3882.

3589.

3327.

3331.

3639.

3642.

3454.

3585.

3437.

3296.

3273.

3669.

3870.

3603.

3450.

3293.

2938.

2837.

4994.

3389.

3986.

4445.

4904.

5729.

6755.

7459. -

7717.

7909.

7873.

-16991.

55530.

120841 .

119216.

52394. -

29837.

23715.

22833.

15713.

11754.

16848.

4312. -|~ -|-2866.

3186.

3292.

3535.

3642.

4324. \.

443ft ^^ 4436 N^

4521.

4345.

4404.

4502.

4500.

4393.

4036.

3774.

3480.

3528.

3335.

3097.

1500.

3265.

3950.

4207.

3555.

•3167.

2443.

1816.

•2105.

-2312.

4507.

2834.

3014.

3355.

3952.

-4433.

4614.

4768.

4733.

4799.

TO3.

23226.

35329.

•48132.

•26534.

•38008.

42485.

34839.

32832.

28531.

•24883.

2085.

2493.

4839.

3233.

3324.

3196.

3519.

3805.V

4137. N.

4723. \ -

5202.

S372.

S133.

5422.

5350.

4594.

3496.

3410.

3975.

4811.

-4635.

3564.

2461.

4870.

1893.

-4154.

-4264.

4485.

•3388.

-4016.

•3989.

-4253.

-4780.

•5316.

6179.

-6420.

-6686

-7008.

-6773.

-12917.

44120.

•39970.

-46208.

-36436.

47199.

48497.

43354.

18013.

-16746.

1587.

1898.

2197.

2496.

2999.

3328.

3511.

3339.

3026.

2995.

3353.

4351. \.

5723. N.

9575.

10249.

5989.

3268.

3391.

4673.

4629.

2131.

1918.

2529.

-1500.

•1916.

4158.

•2660.

3144.

4101.

4399.

-4607.

•5462.

4845.

•5365.

5673.

•6119.

6403.

4634.

-7491.

42237.

32405.

-41747.

48135.

-31302.

•33024.

•33073.

•30404.

1319.

1822.

2484.

2771.

2377.

2062.

1923.

2083.

4577.

3323.

5673.

9108.

10338.

12315.

9220.\\.

2743. N. -

2064.

neo.

3838.

3576.

4157.

•1420.

-1376.

4539.

4824.

4160.

4755.

3678.

-4581.

-4828.

-4521.

-4289.

3905.

-4134.

-4476. -

•4119.

-4043.

-4769.

-11522.

41189.

47412.

36394.

2177.

2560.

2904. -

2895.

2553.

2545.

2571. -

3363.

{030.

9108.

4-1161. -

•10255.

8011.

2741.

2032. -

2483.

3339.

3528.

2724. -

1878.

4343.

-1568. -

-1803.

4179.

4748.

-3628. -

-4466.

-4415.

-3710.

3262. -

-3223.

3421.

-3968.

•4304. -

-4323.

-4287.

-4657.

-5515. -

4002.

48914.

49417.

•40036. -4-

45111.

43991.

43212.

-17818. -)-

•19381.

-10559.

i 1 l 1 l6600E 6800E 7000E 7200E 7400E

9

CT)0OOZ

eno , /-^ ff* Q

^~ ^5 B * ^^ ^^ ^^J& een000Oz

en\jooz

enenOOZ

enenooZ v

NS^en N.-^ ^s.o \oZ a

7en \ j /o /X/o /v \z 7 \yen /fNOOOZ

Scale 1:5000-^ 100 0 100 200

g (meters)

enOOOZ

^ Figure 10CD

i RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONROBBIE LAKE GRID

g TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) 8 APPARENT RESISTIVITY VALUESz ———————————————————————————————————————^ Apparent Resistivity in ohm-m -J AB = 1650 m, D = 50 m , St. Spacing 25 mS B RGM IP-6 Instrumentz October 1997


6600E 6800E 70QOE 7200E 7400E

o oCD

O O O CO

O O CD in

O O COin

o o r- in

o o to in

o o ui in

o o

O O

o oCM

o o

o o oLO

o o

o oCO

oo

+

+

+

6600E 68ter 7000E 7200E

CD

Oo

CD Oo o

en to o o

en oo o o

en ^i o o

en CD o o

o o

en M o o

eno o

en o o o

CDoo

COo o

o o

7400E

100

Scale 1:5000 o 100 200

(meters)

Figure 11


TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) APPARENT RESISTIVITY P LAN MAP

Contour Interval 2000 ohm-mAB = 1650 m, D = 50 m, St. Spacing 25 m



o

o o

ooOJ

Oo

48,00 5000

8 g l4-

5200 54,00 J6,00

S S S g

+

-; —; ro

4800 5000 5200 5400

i l

5600

5800

ro o

M O O

Oo

5800

•B JSStjt f~ll V8100

Scale 1:5000O 100 200

(meters)

Figure 12


TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) APPARENT RESISTIVITY VALUES

Apparent Resistivity in ohm-mMax. Depth 272 m



o

oo

o

a o

48,00

4800

5000 5200

|l j.

5000 5200

5400 600

5400 5600

5800

o o

o

5800

e100 200

(meters)

Figure 13


TIMMINS, ONTARIO (CABOT/BURROWS TOWNSHIPS) APPARENT RESISTIVITY SECTION - LINE 6600E

Contour Interval 500 ohm-mMax. Depth 272 m



48,00o

o o

o o

5000 5200

+

8 5

5400

S S S S S 2

S g 8 ft S

K K K gCM 00 N5 —

+

s s

4800 5000 5200 5400

5600

5600

5800

T0o

ro oo

Oo

5800

100Scale 1:5000

O 100 200

(meters)

Figure 14






o4800 50,00 5200 5400 5600 5800

o

v*'

100:5000

100 200

(meters)

O O

O O

o o

4800 5000 5200 5400 5600

To 0

oo

O

5800

Figure 15






o

o o

o oC\l

o o

48,00

+

+

4800

5000 5400 5600

i

s s

S Sa S s y B s

i i l i i l

+ +

l l

5000 5200 5400 5600

5800o

o o

o

o

5800

100Scale 1:5000

O 100

(meters)

Figure 16






o

o o

4800

4800

5000 5200

5000 5200

5600

5400 5600

5800

o o

oo

o

5800

2.17100

Scale 1:5000O 100

(meters)

Figure 17






zg

zo o

z o o m

zo o

zo o

o0 C\J

zo o"~

o

in o o

(fi o0 C\l

COo o ro

GOo0

1400E 1600E 1800E

--

-

-

-

--

r ----

.

- -

- ----

'

-

- :

•4.0

4.3

4.4

9.4

4.1

4.0

4.4

-9.0

9.3

4.6

40.3

11.2

41.6

10.4

10.7

4.4

4.8

4.3

41.3

42.9

43.8

13.7

13. 9

42.1

42.7

12.8

10.8

10.9

41.5

12.4

12.5

12.4

42.6

13.0

13.4

15.4

48.1

17.9

26.2

45.1

20.3

17.0

14.2

10.6

" 1 223332

4.0

4.5

4.0

4.7

4.4

4.4

-7.9

4.1

4.3

4.0

7.9

9.0

41.5

41.7

42.3

4.1

46.4

45.6

-in. i45.0

42.0

H3.2

-0.4

-8.4

4.6

-11.6

4.3

4.1

4.7

7.5

4.4

10.0

?.o ~~-2.6

4.0

-1.7

-0.8

4.0

4.3

3.5

4.2 -

5.2

5.3

-4.9

5.7

B.O

4.9

40.3

4.8

4.0

4.3

4.1

4.4

4.4

•11.7

42.6 -

43.0

H3.1

41.4

4.6

4.B

4.6

4.8

4.8

4.4

4.3

4.0

4.1

4.9

4.0

4.1

4.7

4.9

4.9

4.0

4.3

4.3

6.1

5.9

5.6

5.6

5.9

4.0

6. B

5.2

5. D

4.9

1400E 1600E 1800E

Ooz

en0 0z

en Oo z

o oz

Lsl

o o z

f.hO 0o z

t\ lNo oz

0 Scale 1:5000100 0 100

(meters)

0 O CO

ho0o 00 Figure 18

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONo OLD COMINCO GRID

TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP) CHARGEABILITY VALUES

o Chargeability in ms o AB ^ 1650 m, D = 50 m , St. Spacing 25 m 00 BRGM IP-6 Instrument

October 1997


1600E 1800E

o oLO

o o

oo

o oCN

o o

o

o o

LO OoCN

(fi o o

LO Oo

1223332

o o

en o o

en O O

O O

CM O O

O O

O O

O

O OLO

M O O 00

CMooLO

O O LO

140CE 1600E 1800E

^858

Scale 1:5000100 O 100

mgf^fm——(meters)

Figure 19

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONOLD COMINCO GRID

TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP) CHARGEABILITY PLAN MAP

Contour Interval 1/2 msAB ^ 1650 m, D = 50 m , St. Spacing 25 m



o

oo

i

00 CM

O 0n

i

-300 -200 -100 0 1pO 290 3QO 490 590 690 7QO 800-\- -\- -f- -|- j- | -f- -p -f- .. -. — | — - —— -

-" -* — " M I-O --* — *

-4- 4- 4- 4- 44 r r T+T r t T+T T r T+ 4- 4- 4.

'fTTyt^TtttyVrV^VTTTT'^'f^TT-4 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4-

yii — c^hovjoco^cBCDCo^îiufocriSviCTcQM — ^toôoco(DxjoooiasoDOo*o

tTTTTTTtTTTYTtTtTtTTtt'Tr'TTTTTrTtTTTTTT^ ^ 4- 4- 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

i . . i i . i i i i L i-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

o

ô o

M Oo

l0 0

9 1 785Scale 1:500CW * *50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Figure 20

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONOLD COMINCO GRID - LINE 1 600E

TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP)CHARGEABILITY VALUES

Chargeability in ms Max. D epth 272 rn

BRGM IP-6 Instrument October 1997


8

——'g—F* * l C

-3,00 -2,00 -1,00o

oo

o oCN

Oo

+

+

100 200 300 400 500

-300 -200 -100 O 100 200 300 400 500

600

+

600

800,

o o

M O O

700 800

Scale 1 :500050 O 50 100 150 200 250 300

•l U(meters)

Figure 21


TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP) CHARGEABILITY SECTION - LINE 1 600E

Contour interval 1/2 msMax . Depth 272 'm



1400E 1600E 1800E

zo o^

zo oto

zo oin

zo o^

z0o

zo oIN

z0 0"~

o

CO0 0T —

CO0 0r\i

COo o

COo o

- ---

.

--

----

- ----

--

--

.--

- ----

.-.-

-i--

-

--

'"

-

1918.

1660.

1914.

4358.

4206.

4337.

4685,

4543.

4441.

4133.

1269.

671.

sot.

610.

715.

592.

745.

673.

404.

460.

448.

1012.

1173.

1376.

4524.

-1959.

-2630.

-2742.

2246.

1536.

1278.

1394.

1362.

1170.

670.

757.

636.

483.

107.

49.

420.

502.

*74.

137J.

™- 1223332

-2109.

1988.

4J62.

4721 .

5016.

4984.

4391,

1747.

4651,

1929.

1801.

1660.

4330.

•943.

691.

641.

693.

775.

978.

1206.

1514.

1798.

3753.

2254.

479.

2597.

3369.

3957.

3689.

3389.

3395.

3189.

2624.

1555.

•1176.

878.

474.

906.

1085.

1505.

2885.

4508.

8670.

8971.

1-1449.

5103. -

5799.

4620.

4836.

4910. -

4281.

4933.

4205.

4873. -

1386.

1598.

1689.

4362. -

446.

643.

449.

1600.

-2719.

•4008.

5159. -

5628.

5518.

-5831.

•4773. -

•8225.

10316.

•9742.

-8364. -

•5294.

"4926.

•4833.

5283. —

5583.

6228.

7730. -

6964.

9369.

12423.

43608. -

13559.

10998.

6172.

•6744. -

i1400E 1600E 1800E

-j ^ T, - ' * "'g jCy o ^ -z

O")o oz

Cn0 0Z

o oz

G-JO 0z

\hoo oz

IN lN_ j.0 0 f

V

Q

Scale 1:5000100 0 100^^^•^^^^•^^^^^•••••••••••••q

(meters)

Sen

hooen Figure 22

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONo OLD COMINCO GRID

TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP)APPARENT RESISTIVITY VALUES

o Apparent Resistivity in ohm-m o AB ^ 1650 m, D = 50 m , St. Spacing 25 m00 BRGM IP-6 Instrument

October 1997


400 E 1600E 1800E

o

o o

O OLO'

o o

o o to

o o

o c

o

o o

in ooCM

Ul O O

O O

1223332

o o

o o

en O O

o o

o o

o o

o o

o

oo in

NJo o00

o o00

o o00

140CE 1600E 1800E

OS

Scale 1:5000100 O 100. 'l^l

(meters)

Figure 23


TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP) APPARENT RESITIVITY PLAN MAP

Contour Interval 500 chm-mAB = 1650 m, D ^ 50 m , St. Spacing 25 m



-300o

oo

o otN

Oolro |

-300

-200 -100 10040 200 M 400 600

4- +i i i

4-

-200 -100 l 00 200 300 400 500 700

800,

Jv)"O

O

800

50 250 300

(meters)

Figure 24

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONOLD COMINCO GRID - LINE 1 600E

TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP) APPARENT RESISTIVITY VALUES

Apparent Resistivity in ohm-m AB = 1650 m , D = 50 m , St. Spacing 25

BRGM IP-6 Instrument October 1997

m


-300 -2,00 -100o

o o

o o

o o

200 300 400 500 600

-300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600

"o

o o

JS" Oo

o

700 800

Scale 1:500050 O 50 100 150 200 250 300

-l 'L.(meters)

Figure 25


TIMMINS, ONTARIO (BURROWS TOWNSHIP) APPARENT RESITIVITY SECTION - LINE 1 600E




OntaciP Ministry ofNorthern Development

MinesDeotaratton of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990

Transaction Number (office

ssment Files Research Imaging

Personal information coll Mining Act, the informatk Questions about this cc 933 Ramsey Lake Road,

41P14SW00152.17858 BURROWS

Instructions: - Foi- Please type or print in ink.

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)

900

1(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the k and correspond with the mining land holder, rthern Development and Mines, 6th Floor,

jse form 0240.

. 17858Name

Address X

fi^ft-flOCi ^/f/isui-e . S/'.

\6*c^~, -Zr vieiAL-Name '

Address

CTient Number

Jb/^'YTelephone Number

Fax Number

60 V- 623-333"?Client Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

pi Physical: drilling, stripping, rn Rehabilitation 1—i trenching and associated apsave i—i

r— Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys,1 — 1 assays and work under section 18 (regs) assays

Work Type

Dales Work ^ ,, ,, --, ^ -, T ^. s- ^ Performed From 23, i Cft l? To O6 \ 'O ^7

Day j Month Year Day | Month YearGlobal Positioning System Data (if available) Township/ Area

M or G-Plan Number

Office Use

Commodity

Total S Value of Work Claimed ^ *-S 5V *~NTS Reference

Mining Division ^^^ 'aJt^

Resident Geoloqist^ A

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent

l,) /-

iy. U , do hereby certify that the facts set(Print Name) C/

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to b-fjeirlfmed or witnessed the same during or after its comptetk)n and, to thej?est oTmy knowledge, the annexed report is true.

^igriature ofR Date

^MTelephone Number Fax Number

81/88/1998 14:55 6046233355 RUBICON MINERALS PftGE 88

V5. Work lo be recorded Md distributed. Work can only be assigned lo claims that are contiguous (adjoining) lo ,^ the mining land where work was performed, at the time work wesgjerfojmied. A map showing the contiguous^!* . \ must accompany this form. f-t|Y\eyVo *2^o

Mining CMm Number. Or H work MM don* on other eligible mlnlnB land, ihow hi thla column tlM location number Indicated on me claim map.

•0

•g

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

e9

10

1112

13

14

IS

TB 7887

1234567

1234688

i2itsytf122*55112 1212 f*

I221HZ

121212?

(212128

I2HSSI **

1211550 *

Number at Claim nlta. For other Inlng tend. Hal eciarea.

16 h*

12

2

l(e

16

It,/S"

t2ff1?*3 *

Column ToUla

Valua ol work performed on thla claim or olhar mining land.

*26. 625 "

0

18.882

tl.tn

i I6.ex,e,—

i s. sfi. — .———

W3K

Value ol work applied to this claim.

N/A

124,000

.4.000 ^

t-i&k-i 6. 100 "

i&fc*——

1 1 1 800"f 5.600'

*tl k \W J

* 1 1,200 '

$2 i l $•^2

Value ol work aMlgned lo olhar mining ctalma.

S24.000

0

0

^^a.v\

^ f. t-ttC,—

1 f, SK————

J IS, 2SC*

Bank. Value ol work lo be olelrlbulad ai a future dale.

S2.625

0

J4.892

———

. ——

——

— —

———

——

- ——

———

——

J. (r "e zc. . do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible undersubsection 7 (1) of (he Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment lo contiguous claims or for application to ihe claim where the. wo,rk was done. ^s^~

l In Writing

Instructions tor cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in Ihls declaration may be cut back. Please check ( -- ) In the boxes below lo show howyou wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

D 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as Indicated.

Od 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the dalms listed last, working backwards; or O 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or D 4. Credits are lo be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not Indicated how your credits are lo be deleted, credits will be cui back Irom the Bank first, followed by option number 2 If necessary.

For Office Use Only—^^——-—-————Received sump Deemed Approvad Data

OMifoanat

Data NollDcallon Sem

rotH VMM* of

ippravad tor HaanRng by Mining Racordar (fflfl SiuraT

JflN 08 '98 18:06 604S233355 PflGE.08

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use Only-—-——^——Received Stamp "~~

0241 (02/96)

Deemed Approved Date

Date Approved

Date Notification Sent

Total Value of Credit Approved

Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)

Ontario Ministry of ' Northern Development and Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Transaction Number (office use)

Personal Information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This Information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed lo the Chief Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 6lh Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 685. "

Work Type

^^fr,J-

^sw.o4^t/— j- /- \

f r , xj.r irt. y f L people, lf ( / " s

Units of WorkDepending on the type of work, list (lie number ol hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres ol grid line, number of samples, etc.

/S" d&y^

/J2 jL,*}"

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

C/c/x-r? Ok-cy^t^Ls

1 ^KCC- (uir\J?zJ j hfa *4

' fr/iftfx (C* r* Tew ^ /^ sitSkV^)Transportation Costs -j- L f 1

Iru-tJL t-efi-tejf/l si&ysj

/r'LA.ck. sW, '6t(Z.Ce. f J J^i5 y^*\.)^y t ' .x Food and Lodging Costs i i i j lr~i

/^Jor&l

i^Cxd

Cost Per Unit of work

^ /SVO l fjAy

yD / 7^ f C/SAA/r i 7

i )

^JT(O l ClG.\/If

^ /^40.33/L^t

Total Value oLA^SfiessrnentfW^tk")1 3 "i vf i t \

f * - - - - *tar-- 4 11 Bk~— 'ri.'* 1

Calculations of Filing Discounts: k'- i L K'-f

1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 1000/ GsrOteCa'b'oVe T6tStESSMiWT f ? If work is filed aftpr two years and up to fiv*1 year* aflpr ner'nr nance, "1 cah'&m&.heLGlainifit '

Total Cost

&22SO ~

J^j &Z5 -

X /^ ^/o^'

^Vf6.V^

4/^v.s^^ ?i?2) —

tS *^C^

sS *^ ^ -^ "~

^y/^.vy0?*^^)^^* ^^5

J3S.81

38S6.61tsYzy/.te

Vssessment Work, at 500Xo of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 ~ Total $ value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certification verifying costs:

l, ___J. G-f^-f],L*-,ld Mem (/gvrX- , do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may(please print lull name) CJ

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

the accompanying Declaration of Work form as

lo make this certification.(recorded holder, agent, or state company position with signing authority)

l am authorized

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

January 19, 1998

J. Canfield MacveighRUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONSUITE 888 -1100 MELVILLE STREETVANCOUVER, BCV6E-4A6

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (888)415-9846 Fax: (705) 670-5881

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Submission Number: 2 .17858

StatusW9780.01092 Deemed Approval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the. results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 11773

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .17858

Date Correspondence Sent: January 19, 1998 Assessor:Steve Beneteau

Transaction NumberW9780.01092Section:14 Geophysical IP

First Claim Number1211544

Township(s) l Area(s) BURROWS, CABOT

StatusDeemed Approval

Approval Date

January 15,1998

Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):J. Canfield MacveighRUBICON MINERALS CORPORATIONVANCOUVER, BC

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 11773

22

-i m

OH

Z t

,

Z2JC

/5^$O

>T

II>

—^

< 0

3 33

~

> m

CO

"H3m

o

^Z

Q5

il: 23 > O

m .

H 33

r- '

2 q

"O ':

U'o

m5

ozo

^

2 H

w

m>

c z

5 ^I

^CO

OO

WQ

^

iwm

c5

' "'w

OE

-oi 2

o m

^ c/

51

mLW

'd^H

MA

TT

AG

AM

I TW

P.

10 to o

CD

l— —

l r

s 1=

1

-si

l^^

^^A

—l

*.

Lil

.- -^

O

S

rr-r

1-^

^ l

^

——

l Ax^ t

*w

O) m

(O o o, o (O 3 3

K?

KE

MP

TW

P.

Z

O 8

•o

J*

S -

5 5 :\

CD (b CJl

CDm CO

a "65 o

O) s 9

at o,

u OD

O w

o -

O. (t o

3

:~

*0

JT

co

O O o

5!' l

CO o n

O

3J m

o o

mm

*;

r-

2

Strt

O

co

CO

^

r-

r-

r-e

— z^

O

rnaj

r 12

o *

o d

3 E

S2

^

^s

t/)

X m

Ci

BS

V5

Oo

c o z

-o2

r-

t"

r-

-f

-4 B

O

JH^

rn5

z

z

-Hi-

f71

S

OZ

,-

O

J.

ss

rr-

O

Q

O

D Of)

CO

O m o x o I 5 z C/)

coo

200

THEAPPE/i ISHASFROMANGUAflWISHIING CSULT

NORTI MENT DITIOION TlLAND:

BurrowsTwp.

l

cL

O Oo

(FORMATION THAT ON THIS MAP

JEEN COMPILED VARIOUS SOURCES, CCURACY !S NOT ^NTEED. THOSE G TO STAKE MIN-MMS SHOULD CON- WITH THE MINING

RECOI D1R, MINISTRY OF HERN DEVELOP

MINES. FOR AD- INFORMATION

U.J20I7II i I2QI7IO l

— ——-\-

C120I72I l O ! 1201713

——-j——--4-———————Pi7?"'I53M. 1 |t|20l7!4 2'MV

c '^

(D

ALE STATUS OF THESHOWN HEREON.

Connaught Twp.

b.k.

NOTICE OF FORESTRY ACTIVITYTHIS TOWNSHIP/AREA FALLS WITHIN THESHININGTREE MANAGEMENT UNIT AND

MAY BE SUBJECT TO FORESTRYOPERATIONS. THE MNR UNIT FORESTER FOR THIS 71 rev.

LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINES:TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC. -LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC

UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINES -PARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC -

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY f

UTILITY LINES -

NON-PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESERVATIONS

ORIGINALSHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

* l

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL

PATENT, SURFACE St M INING RIGHTS.._.............. 9

.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY————..........,. ©

.MINING RIGHTS ONLY___ — ——........... O

LEASE, SURFACE St MINING RIGHTS————...—_. H

" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY._—.....—........... H

" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY............—......'....... Q

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ..__.____................. T

ORDER IN COUNCIL ..._. _..........__—...——— OC

RESERVATION ___.....................—— .. ——. 0

CANCELLED ___......—.. ............—..,........... ®

SAND 81 GRAVEL ___....___......-.——— . .—.— ©TRAPLINE CABIN...____._.......^.___ ......_.- ... --.. . . T

SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS

O 1000 2000 4OOO 6000 80OO

O 20OMETRES

10OOl l KMI

2000(2 KM)

TOWNSHIP DATE

CABOTM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

TIMMINS

MINING DIVISION

LARDER LAKELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

SUDBURY

PRO1OFR E'

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Date

ARCHIVED FEB. 21/95

Number

G-960

16

o ea

O

OD O

H^ .T)

AREA CAN BE CONTACTED AT P.O. BOX 129. TELEPHONE

LOW AVENUE, GOGAMA. ONTARIO. POM IWO705-894-2000 CD

iCD CD O

assessment work rpt robbie lake prop geophys survey

Documents