assignment 5 interoperability slide share

12
INTEROPERABILITY LIS 688-METADATA Group 6: Krishawna Brown, Thomas Kozak, Whit Preston, and Alison Walsh May 1, 2011 Click the above icon for audio narr

Upload: rwpreston135

Post on 16-Aug-2015

362 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  1. 1. InteroperabilityLIS 688-Metadata
    Group 6:
    Krishawna Brown, Thomas Kozak, Whit Preston, and Alison Walsh
    May 1, 2011
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  2. 2. Interoperability-Definition
    National Information Standards Organization (NISO)-
    ...the ability of multiple systems with different hardware and software platforms, data structures, and interfaces to exchange data with minimal loss of content and functionality. (NISO 2004).
    Essentially, function must not be lost.
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  3. 3. Interoperability-Definition (Continued)
    Some definitions emphasize what obstacles an interoperability initiative must overcome: Metadata interoperability is a qualitative property of metadata information objects that enables systems and applications to work with or use these objects across system boundaries (Haslhofer & Klas, 2010, p. 7:14).
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  4. 4. The Importance of Metadata Interoperabilty
    Why important?
    The ultimate goal for such systems is for the components to evolve independently yet be able to call on one another efficiently and conveniently (Paepcke et al., 1998).
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  5. 5. Issues of Interoperability
    Gail Hodge
    In regard to consistency,
    information collected by one organization for a particular purpose can be searched, exchanged, transferred, used, and understood by another organization for a different purpose (Hodge, 2005, p. 39).
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  6. 6. Interoperability Problems
    Several issues must be tackled:
    The machines must be able to communicate.
    The systems must also understand and process objects from another system.
    Finally, on the semantic level, structures must be put in place for correct interpretation of the objects, by humans or by machines.
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  7. 7. Abstraction Levels
    Most Concrete
    Most Abstract
    Technical
    Syntactic
    Semantic
    Pragmatic
    Dynamic
    Conceptual
    Source:(Haslhofer & Klas, 2010)
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  8. 8. Overall Categories of Interoperability
    Uniform standard -> In other words, multiple organizations agree on one standard to use.
    Application profiling/adaptation/modification -> Different modifications starting from one standard.
    Derivation -> Start with complex standard and simplify for different uses.
    Crosswalk/mapping -> Organizations use different standards, use crosswalks to move from one to another.
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  9. 9. Overall Categories of Interoperability (Continued)
    Switching schema -> Hub-like structure: organizations using different schemas all crosswalk to one central schema, then back again.
    Lingua franca -> set of core attributes common to multiple schemas.More difficult interoperability using this method.
    Metadata framework/container -> Essentially a superschema, which contains elements from all the schemas used by participating organizations.
    Source:Chan, Lois Mai. (2005) Metadata interoperability: a study of methodology.Retrieved April 20, 2011 from http://white-clouds.com/iclc/cliej/cl19chan.htm
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  10. 10. Conclusion
    The research: 2 main categories:
    Extremely technical
    Broad
    Each organization must assess what specific obstacles must be overcome while at the same time being able to incorporate:
    usability for the sake of practicality.
    flexibility and adaptability for the sake of creating the next schema.
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  11. 11. References
    Chan, Lois Mai. (2005) Metadata interoperability: a study of methodology.Retrieved April 20, 2011 from http://white-clouds.com/iclc/cliej/cl19chan.htm
    Haslhofer, B. & Klas, W. (2010). A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys, 42(2), 7.1-7.37. doi:10.1145/1667062.1667064
    Hodge, G. (2005). Metadata for electronic information resources: From variety to interoperability. Information Services & Use, 25, 35-45.
    Click the above icon for audio narration.
  12. 12. References (Continued)
    National Information Standards Organization. (2004). Understanding Metadata.Retreived April 20, 2011 from http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf
    Paepcke, A., Chang, C.C., Winograd, T., & Garca-Molina, H. (1998), Interoperability for digital libraries worldwide, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 33-42.
    Click the above icon for audio narration.