associates md. - a100.gov.bc.caa100.gov.bc.ca/appsdata/acat/documents/r7858/ok169... ·...

q. Golder Associates Md. 220 - 1755 Springfield Road Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada V1Y 5V5 Telephone (250) 860-8424

P.O. Box 307 Keremeos, British Columbia VOX 1NO

Attention: Art and Elsie Friesen

RE: PROOF OF WATER - LOT#I AND LOT#2, PART OF LOT B, SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 52, SIMILKAMEEN DIVISION YALE DISTRICT, PLAN 32785, KEREMEOS, BRlSTlSH COLUMBIA

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Friesen:

Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) is pleased to submit this letter report presenting the results of pumping tests and water quality assessment (proof of water) conducted for two lots near Keremeos, B.C. (Figure 1). The legal description for the properties are Lot#l and Lot#2, part of Lot B, Section 20, Township 52, Similkameen Division Yale District (SDYD) Plan 32785 (Figure 2) (herein referred to as Lot#l and Lot#2). It understood that the lots are being subdivided and a "proof of water" is required by the Regional District of Osoyoos-Similkameen (RDOS) for both domestic groundwater supply wells. Written authorization to proceed with this assessment was provided by Mr. Art Freisen on August 7,2002.

According to Roza Alywin of the RDOS, Bylaw No. 300 (Section 4) is applicable to the site in regards to water supply issues. The requirements for the water wells are as follows:

Each parcel must be 9,000 f t2 (840 m2 or 0.2 acres) in area.

A well must be drilled for each parcel of the proposed subdivision.

All wells must be constructed to prevent surface water from entering the well and shall be provided with a cover made of reinforced concrete or met

50 -yui \ r :

i O\iPil i.\

OFFICES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA, SOUTH AMERICA, EUROPE, ASIA, AUSTRALASIA

W Art and Elsie Friesen I- August 21,2002

- 2 - 022-4 140

All wells must be capable of delivering water at a rate of not less than 3 Imperial gallons per minute (Igpm) (13.6 Wmin).

A water sample must be collected from each well and determined to be potable according to B.C. Drinking Water Quality Standards.

All testing and reports must be certified by a professional hydrologist or groundwater geologist.

1.0 BACKGROUND

The lots are located on the east side of Highway 3A, approximately 3 km northeast of Keremeos, B.C. (Figure 1). The eastern portion of Lot B slopes steeply to the west, with the remaining property sloping gently towards the southwest. Keremeos Creek flows southward through Lot B.

Figure 2 outlines the proposed property subdivision of Lot#l and Lot#2 from Lot B. The area of each lot is approximately 2000 m2. There are two existing wells on Lot#l, a well near the shop on the northern portion of the property (not tested in this investigation) and a second well located near the calf hutches and shop on the southern portion of the property (herein referred to as Well#l). Well#l supplies water for the house on Lot#l and drinking water for the livestock. The well on Lot#2 (herein referred to as Well#2) is located in the northeastern corner of the property and supplies water for the house on this property and some irrigation use.

Both wells are located in a sheltered well house, with an elevated concrete floor surrounding the well and a sealed plastic cover, preventing surface water from entering the wells.

Well#lwas drilled on May 22, 2000 by Cyclone Drilling of Kelowna, B.C. According to the well logs (attached to this report), subsurface conditions at this well consisted of clay with sand, gravel, cobbles and/or boulders to approximately 16 m. This was underlain by sand and gravel to a depth of 21 m and silty clay and sand to a depth of 23 m. The well contains a 15 cm (6-inch) diameter steel casing from ground surface and is screened from 19.2 m to 21.2 m. At the time of the well installation, the depth to water was 14.9 m depth. The recommended pump setting was at a depth of approximately 18.2 m, at an estimated flow rate was 151 Wmin (40 US gpm).

Golder Associates

w Art and Elsie Friesen

3 - ;jr August 2 1, 2002

022-4140

Well#2 was drilled on March 20, 1998 by Field Drilling Contractors Ltd. of Aldergrove, B.C. The well log for Well#2 (attached to this report) indicated silty sand and gravel were found to a depth of 12.2 m, underlain by sand and gravel to a depth of 16.8 m. The 15 cm diameter well was screened from 15.2 m to 16.9 m. According to the well log, the depth to water at the time of the well installation was 7.9 m. The recommended pump setting was at a depth of 14.9 m, at an estimated flow rate of 114 Wmin (30 US gpm).

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 Aquifer Pumping Tests

To assess the well yield, a 2-hour pumping test was completed at each of the wells. The rationale for conducting a 2-hour pumping test (compared to longer duration pumping tests) were:

the well logs indicated that the wells were installed in unconfined, highly permeable materials and not bedrock, and

the Friesens indicated that the wells have been in use for the past 2 to 4 years, providing approximately 30+ gpm of water.

For these reasons, a 2-hour pumping test was conducted, with the option of extending the pump tests for a longer time period if the water levels were not a steady-state (Le., continuing to decrease) at the end of the 2-hour test.

The pumping tests and water sample collection was conducted by D. Atkinson of Golder on August 8, 2002. During the pump test, the following steps were conducted:

1. Static water levels were recorded in the wells prior to pumping.

2. Using the installed pumped, water was pumped out of each well at rate of approximately 19 L/min (4.2 Igpm) by opening a tap. It should be noted that the pump ran intermittently as required to recharge the pressure tank.

3. Water levels were recorded in each well during pumping.

4. Water levels were observed in each well during the well recovery following the completion of the aquifer pumping test.

Golder Associates

c Art and Elsie Friesen IrrS August 2 1,2002

4 - 022-4 140

Discharge from the wells was directed downgradient from the wells into nearby fields. The discharge rates were monitored regularly by measuring the time to fill a graduated pail and adjusted the flow rate as required. It should be noted that water use of the two wells was minimized for 24 hours prior to the pumping test. However, due to the use of the two wells for livestock watering and human consumption, some water use may have occurred prior and/or during the pumping test.

Upon the completion of the 2-hour pumping test, a water sample was collected on August 8, 2002 from each well and submitted to Cantest Analytical Laboratory of Burnaby, B.C for general potability, including fecal and total coliform analysis. The samples were delivered to Cantest by the following day and analyzed within the recommended holding time. The results of the water analyses were compared to the B.C. Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection (MWLAP) Drinking Water (DW) quality standards (from the Contaminated Sites Regulation) and the Canadian Drinking Water Quality (CDWQ) guidelines.

3.0 RESULTS

3.1 Pumping Tests

Well# 1

The static water level in Well#l was observed to be 15.303 m below top of casing (btoc). The water levels during the 2-hour pumping test stayed constant while pumping at 19 L/min, with the water level not decreasing more than 2 cm while the pump was on. In general, the pump was on for a 2 min. interval every 5 min. to 10 min. to recharge the pressure tank. No recovery data was observed since the final water level immediately prior to stopping the pump test was 15.303 m btoc.

The static water level in Well#2 was observed to be 13.625 m btoc. Similar to Well#l, the water levels during the 2-hour pumping test did not decrease more than 5 cm while the pump was on. In general, the pump was on for a 2 min. interval every 5 min. to 10 min. to recharge to pressure tank. No recovery data was observed since the final water level immediately prior to stoppj.ng the pump test was 13.625 m btoc.

Golder Associates

w Art and Elsie Friesen August 2 1,2002

- 5 - 022-4 140

Based on the results of the 2-hour pumping tests, both wells appear to be capable of delivering at least 19 L/min (4.2 Igpm).

3.2 Chemical Analyses of Groundwater

The results of the chemical analyses of groundwater samples from the two wells are presented on the attached Table 1. The applicable MWLAP DW standards and the CDWQ guidelines are included fior reference.

The results indicated that the potability parameters met the MWLAP DW standards and the CDWQ guidelines, with the exception of total iron in Well#l. While the total (unfiltered) iron concentration, 10.53 mgL, in Well#l exceeded MWLAP and CDWQ standard of 0.3 mgL, the dissolved (filtered) iron concentration, 0.24 mg/L, was less than the drinking water standards. It should be noted the MWLAP specifies that the drinking water standards are for “unfiltered samples obtained at the point of consumption”, however the iron standards is based on aesthetic objectives rather than human health objectives. A water treatment system could be considered for Lot#l to reduce the total iron concentrations to meet the aesthetic iron standard.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of the aquifer pumping tests, Well#l and Well#2 are each considered capable of meeting the requirements of RDOS Bylaw No. 300 (Section 4) and delivering a minimum of 3 Igpm (13.6 Wmin), with both wells easily yielding 4.2 Igpm (19 Wmin) during the test. Although Golder was not present during the drilling and installation of the groundwater wells, both wells appeared to be constructed to prevent surface water from entering the well.

The results of chemical analyses of the groundwater indicate that all potability parameters met the BC MWLAP DW Standards and CDWQ guidelines, with the exception of total iron in Well#l. A water treatment system could be considered on Lot#l to reduce the total iron concentrations to meet the aesthetic iron standard.

Golder Associates

w Art and Elsie Friesen " August 21,2002

- 6 - 022-4140

5.0 LIMITATIONS

This letter report was prepared for the exclusive use of Art and Elsie Friesen and their representatives. Any use which a third party makes of this letter report, or any reliance on, or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibilities of such third parties. Golder accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this letter report. The Friesens have the right to submit this letter re:port to the Regional District of Osoyoos-Similkameen (RDOS) for review and comment. The RDOS may rely on the information contained in this letter report solely to carry out such a review and for the purposes of issuing approvals and/or certificates.

The letter report, which specifically includes all tables, figures attachments, and appendices, is based on data and information collected during the investigation conducted by Golder in August 2002. It provides a level of assurance commensurate with the level of study. The letter report is based solely on the site conditions encountered at the time of the field investigation, supplemented by data obtained by Golder Associates Ltd. as described in this letter report.

In evaluating the site, Golder has relied in good faith on information provided by the individuals and agencies noted in this letter report. We accept no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatements or inaccuracies contained in this letter report as a result of omissions, misinterpretations of .fraudulent acts of the persons or agencies interviewed.

This investigation was performed according to current professional standards and practices in the groundwater field.

Golder Associates

'Irrrr Art and Elsie Friesen - 7 -

'O$ August 21,2002 022-4140

6.0 CLOSURE

We trust this report provides you with the information you require at this time. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Yours very truly,

GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.

Darlene Atkinson, M.Sc. Hydrogeologist

W. Scott Orth, M.Sc., P.Geo. Associate, Office Manager

Attachments DA/WSO/jmf N:\ACTIVE\4100\022-4140 FfUESEN - PROOF OF WATERWAL\RPT-0821-PROOF OF WATER.DOC

Golder Associates

August 2002 Table 'Lr 1 - Drinking Water Analytical Results w Well#l and Well#2, Friesen Properties, Keremeos, B.C.

Conventional Parameters Temperature, Field deg. C pH, Laboratory pH units Conductivity, Laboratory uS/cm True Color cu Turbidity NTU Hardness CaCO3 Total Dissolved Solids m g k Total Alkalinity CaC03 mg/L Bicarbonate Alkalinity HC03 mgL Carbonate Alkalinity C03 Hydroxide Alkalinity OH Dissolved Fluoride F

Nitrate and Nitrite N m g k Dissolved Chloride C1 m a

Dissolved Nitrate N m g k Nitrite N m g k Dissolved Sulphate SO4 mg/L Metals Analysis

Total Calcium Ca mgL Total Iron Fe m g 5 Total Magnesium Mg mgL Total Manganese Mn m g n Total Potassium K m g k

m a m a m g L m g h m g 5 m g k

,Dissolved Calcium Ca Dissolved Iron Fe Dissolved Magnesium Mg Dissolved Manganese Mn Dissolved Potassium K Dissolved Silicon Si02 Dissolved Sodium Na mgL Microbiological Analysis Total Coliform (Confirmed) C01./100 mL Fecal Coliform co1./100 mL

11.4 7.84 501 < 5 1.9 213 322 170 208 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.09 6.3 0.93 0.93

< 0.002 76.5

64.2 +'p"<-Y> I".#,**?

16.9 0.003 2.73

:$& &53;A%g

63.4 0.24 13.4

0.002 2.67 17

12.6

< 1 < 1

10.9 7.87 47 8 < 5 0.43 213 316 174 213 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.09 5.2 0.82 0.82

< 0.002 76.5

15 6.5 - 8.5

15 5

500

250

500

64.7 0.26 0.3 15.9

< 0.001 0.05 2.91 62.4 0.22 0.3 14

< 0.001 0.05 2.88 18.3 12.5 200

< 1 < 1

5

1.5

10 10 1

not detected not detected

022-4140

1.5 250 10 10 3.2

0.3 100 0.05

0.3 100 0.05

200

1. CDWQ - Canadian Drinking Water Quality Guidelines, Health Canada (1996). A 0 = Aesthetic Objective MAC = Maximum Acceptable Concentration

Regulation of the Waste Management Act B.C. Reg. 375196 (1996 with 2002 amendments). DW = Drinking Water Standards

2. BC MWLAP DW = British Columbia Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection Contaiminated Sites

3. Bold and shaded values indicates concentration exceeds the CDWQ and/or MWLAJ? Drinking Water Standard.

N:/Active/4100/4140/Lab Resultdwater resulkxls Golder Associates Page 1 of 1

1 :50,000 Figure 1 - Key Plan Proof of Water

Friesen Properties, Keremeos, British Columbia Golder Associates

.,. ,

.. .. ' . :., , . .+ - , ' . .

I

Figure 2 - Site Plan Proof of Water

Friesen Properties, Keremeos, British Columbia Golder Associates

P.0 Ban841 PhOCkr: (304) 857-2268 Fa: (604) 667-2267 __-- -- -... ,.-. -.- .......................... . .........

ALQERGRCIVE, B.C. V4W 2Vl ---*1.. ---.I, .. -.-.. . . .-_,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

WATER WELL RECORD

10

- TO:

00 55

,-.. *.,.,,.".

Pscrtptloc iECTIQI

WELL LOG DEdCWPt ION! j i l t y eand and gravel . t.9. send ~ n d gravel

i 1

, ? u s 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L I N K S AutoFax

Date : August 19, 2002 TO : Golder Associates Ltd. Att'n: M s . Darlene Atkinson From: LINKS Automatic Fax Subject: Analytical results for Group# 30809091

( 0 9 : U O ) P g 1 of 1 6

Vancouver. BC V6J 1J8

Fax: 604 731 2386

Tel. 604 735 7276

1 800 665 8566

CanTesl Ltd.

Professional Anaivtical

A Member of the CANAM Group

Services

CANTEST Group# 30809091 Proj ect Name: Friesen Project Number: 022-4140 Submission Date: August 9 , 2002 Matrix : Water

This is a final report. A signed report and invoice will be sent by courier or mail.

Thank you for considering CANTEST for your analytical needs. Please feel free to contact a Technical Service Representative at (604) 734-7276 (1-800-665-8566) should you have any questions about the LINKS "AutoFax" or any other CANTEST services.

CANTEST & RESEARCH SERVICES GROUP Helping bring new Canadian products to market

NOTE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it 1s addressed and contains information that is confidential. If the reader of this message is not the ktended recipient, or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, your are hereby notified that any disclosure or distribution of this communication Is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communicofion In enor, piease notify us immediately by telephone and return the orlginal to us at the above address by mail without making a copy. Thank you.

AUG-19-2002 09:15 LINKS RutoFax 93% P.O1

gug 1 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L I N K S AutoFax

Q0

CLIENT SAMPLE Well Lot Well Lot I DENT IF1 CAT1 ON: #1 #2

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~

REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.

t

REPORT DATE: August 19,2002

DATE SAMPLED: Aug 9/02

CANTEST ID: 208090300

( 0 9 : O O ) P g 2 of 1 6

w

bjective

Aug 9/02

208090301

pH, Laboratory 7.84 7.87 True Color e 5 < 5 Turbidity 1.9 0.43 Total Dissolved Solids 322 31 6 Total Alkalinity CaC03 170 174 Bicarbonate Alkalinity HC03 208 21 3 Carbonate Alkalinity C03 < 0.5 < 0.5 Hydroxide Alkalinity OH e 0.5 < 0.5 Dissolved Chloride CI 6.3 5.2 Dissolved Sulphate SO4 76.5 76.5

RUG-19-2002 09115

6.5 - 8.5 pH units 15 cu 5 NTU 500 mg/L

mg/L mg/L mgiL mgiL

250 mg/L 500 mg/L

LINKS RutoFax

Total Metals Analysis Iron Fe 0.53 X Manganese Mn 0.003

93%

0.26 1 < 0.001

Page 3

P.02

Aug 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: LINKS AutoFax

crr

CLIENT SAMPLE Neil Lot Nell Lot IDENTlFl CATION: #1 #2

~~

DATE SAMPLED: Aug 9/02 Aug 9/02



208090300 CANTEST ID:

GROUP NUMBER: 30809091

208090301

( 0 9 : 0 2 ) P q 3 of 16

U

Conductivity Hardness CaC03 Dissolved Fluoride F Nitrate and Nitrite N Dissolved Nitrate N Nitrite N Dissolved Sulphate SO4 Total Metals Analysis Calcium Ca Magnes ium Mg Potassium K Microbiological Analysis

Fecal Coliform Total Coliform (Confirmed)

501 213 0.09 0.93 0.82 0.93 0.82 10.0

76.5 76.5

64.2 16.9 2.73 2.91

< 0.002 < 0.002 1 .o

< 1 < 1 < 1 < 1

pS/crn = microsiemens per centimeter C01./100 mL = Colonies per 100 mL c = Less than detection limit

mg/L = milligrams per liter

RI IG-I 9-2L1W A 9 1 16 LINKS FlutoFax 93%

Page 4

P.03

Aug 19, 0 8 : 5 9 PST by: L I N K S AutoFax

'




CLIENT SAMPLE Well Lot Well Lot IDENTI Fl CATION: #I #2

SAMPLE PREPARATION:

DATE SAMPLED: Aug9/02 Aug9/02

CANTEST ID: 208090300 208090301

Calcium Ca 63.4 Iron Fe 0.24 Magnesium Mg 13.4 14.0 Manganese Mn 0.002 < 0.001 Pot as siu m K 2.67 2.88 Silicon Si02 17.0 18.3 0.05 Sodium Na 12.6 12.5 0.05

D I S SO LV E D D I S S 0 LVE D

LIMIT

( 0 9 : O l ) P g 4 of 1 6

VI

Page 5

RUG-19-2002 09:16 LINKS RutoFax 93% P.04

H u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: LINKS AutoFax

(cr

QC Type

pH Calibration Verification

D up1 i cate

Blank Conductivity Calibration Ve

Duplicate

Calibration Verification

Duplicate

Duplicate

D up1 i cate Duplicate Duplicate




QC Result

101.7 0.0 0.5

1 102.7 3.5 3.6

100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

(09:02) Pg 5 of 16

w

%Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D.

u S/c rn %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D.

Batch Quality Control for Conventional Parameters in Water

98 0 0

0 96 0 0

Parameter

Duplicate

Blank Alkalinity Calibration Ver. Duplicate Duplicate

Conductivity

8.1

2.8 94.0 0.2 0.6

rue Color

urbidify

Duplicate

Duplicate

Blank Dionex Certified Standard D up1 i cat e Duplicate Duplicate

otal Dissolved Solids

otal Alkalinity CaC03 r NC

NC

< 0.05 99.0 NC PASS PASS

Bicarbonate Alkalinity HC03

Carbonate Alkalinity C03

Hydroxide Alkalinity OH

Dissolved Fluoride F mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D. II

0 90 0 0 0

Blank Duplicate

D up1 icat e D up1 icat e

Units Lower Upper 1 /Limit /Limit

% Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.

NTU R.P.D.

R.P.D.

mg/L % Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D.

R.P.D. R.P.D.

R.P.D.

75 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 85 0 0

0 0

0

102 3 3

1

5 5

105 10 10 10

I104

0.1 15

18

4 115 9 9

9 9

9

I O ( 9 R.P.D.

0.05 110 10 10 10

(Continued on next page)

RUG-19-2002 09:17 LINKS RutoFax 93%

Page 6

P. 05

A u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L T N K S AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 2 ) Pg 6 o i 1 6

w U

R.P.D.



0 10


mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.

mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.

mg/L %Recovery %Recovery R.P.D.

mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.

Batch Quality Control for Conventional Parameters in Water

0 90 0 0 0

0 90 0 0 0 0

0 86 93 0

0 90 0 0 0 0

'arameter

)issolved Fluoride F

)issolved Chloride

)issolved Nitrate

litrite

lissolved Sulphate

CI

N

N

SO4

QC Type

Duplicate

Blank Dionex Certified Standard Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate

Blank Dionex Certified Standard Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate

Blank Spike Calibration Verification Duplicate

Blank Dionex Certified Standard Duplicate Duplicate D up1 i cate Duplicate

QC Result

=ASS

c 0.2 104.6 1.1 1.6 6.5

< 0.05 98.3 0.0 2.2

UC 'ASS

< 0.002 99.0

UC

< 0.5 102.0 0.0 0.0 0.1

UC

98.0

0.2 110 12 12 12

0.05 110 10 10 10 10

0.002 112 107 12

1 110 10 10 10 10

uS/cm = microsiemens per centimeter CU = color units NTU = nephelometric turbidity units c = Less than detection limit R.P.D. = Relative Percent Difference

mg/L = milligrams per liter

PASS = Duplicate sample results were in the range of one to five times the detection limit. R.P.D. calculation is not applicable in this range. Acceptance criteria is a maximum difference between the duplicates equivalent to the value of the detection limit. NC = Not Calculated. Duplicate sample results were less than the detection limit. Relative Percent Difference calculatioi is not defined for analyte levels of less than detection limit.

RUG-19-2002 09:18

Page 7

D mC

Aug 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L T N K S AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 3 ) Pg 7 of 16

w U

Parameter Du licate Duplicate Spike ICPMS Spik ICPMS Spik z [R.F.D.) Limits (% Recovery, Limits 208090048 208090049 208090327

Magnesium Mg 0.4 20 Manganese Mn 110 69- 131 100 69 - 131




RUG-19-2002 09:18 97%

Page 8

P 07

A u q 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T b y : L T N K S AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 3 ) P q 8 of 1 6

W w

Parameter ICPMS Lab ICPMS Lab Total Blank Total Blank Fortified Fortified (mg/L) Limits Blank (% Blank Limits Recovery)

blanganese Mn 95 82 - 120 < 0.0002 0.001



potassium K


< 0.002 0.05

Batch Quality Control for Total Metals Analysis in Water (QC# 34796)

mg/L = milligrams p e r liter

Page 9

n nn

h u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 PST by: LTfiTKS AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 4 ) Pg 9 of 1 6

w 'PI

Parameter

Aluminum AI Antimony Sb Arsenic As Barium Ba Beryllium Be Boron B Cadmium Cd Calcium Ca Chromium Cr Cobalt co Copper c u I tun Fe Lead Pb Lithium Li Magnesium Mg Manganese Mn Molybdenum Mo Nickel Ni Pot assiu rn K R u bidi urn Rb Selenium Se Silicon Si02 Silver



% Recovery Limits

92 87 - 131 93 86 - 110 96 88 - 108 96 88 - 114 100 91 - 127 100 87 - 129 97 87 - 111 96 91 - 121 92 86 - 124 90 88 - 118 93 90 - 112 88 85 - 182 93 88 - 114 103 85 - 115 100 91 - 121 102 88 - 130 89 85 - 105 95 86 - 112 96 84 - 118 90 50 - 200 105 95 - 115 99 87 - 115

72- 118


Instrument Quality Control for the HP 7500 ICPMS (QC# 86008)

nlr.,

Page 10

n on

Auq 19,. 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L T N K S AutoFax or)

Duplicate Units Result




Evaluation

( 0 9 : 0 4 ) Pg 10 of 1 6

W

Batch Quality Control for Microbiological Analysis in Water (QC# 34718)

Parameter

Fecal Coliform

QC Type

Duplicate Duplicate

Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate

Result

<1 <1

<1 <1 <1

Co1./100 mL = Colonies per 100 mL PASS = Duplicate analysis is within the 95% Confidence Limits. Duplicate analysis is evaluated using criteria included in British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual 1994 Edition, Section E, pages E l 1 to E12. (MPN method), or page E-56 (MF method).

Page 11

Q7.V P 1 m

A u y 1 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: LTNKS A u t o F a x U

Parameter QC Type QC Result

Total Coliform (Confirmed) Blank < 1

Fecal Coliform Blank < 1




( 0 9 : 0 4 ) P y 11 of 1 6

U

07.r

CoI./lOO mL

Page 12

n 1 1 1 1

A u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T b y : L T W K S AutoFax W

QC Type No. Samples

Blank




lQC TY Pe

( 0 9 : 0 5 ) Pg 1 2 of 16

w

No. Samples

Batch Quality Control Frequency Summaty

Blank Duplicate

1 2

Turbidity Analysis (Batch# 34696)

QC Type

No. Samples

Blank

No. Samples

Blank Duplicate

1 4

QC Type No. Samples


Page 13

P 1 3

A u y ? 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L - - ’ ” S AutoFax OJ

QC Type

Batch Size -




No. Samples

54

( 0 9 : 0 5 1 P g 1 3 of 16 ‘c9

QC Type

Batch Size

Batch Quality Control Frequency Summary

Coliform MF Method in Water (Batch# 34718)

Blank Duplicate

No. Samples

7

QCTYpe

Batch Size

Turbidity Analysis (Batch# 34696)

No. Samples

52

QCTYpe

Batch Size

Auto-Titrator Analysis (Batch# 34697)

No. Samples

39

II I NO. Samples L I

Batch Size 1 26


.-._I.

Page 14

D 1 7

Lw's Aug 19, 08:59 P S T by:




Batch Quality Control Frequency Summary

Total Metals Preparation (Batch# 34796)

No. Samples I I

\Batch Size 1 54

Page 15

b-" A u y 1 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by:

CLIENT SAMPLE ID STATUS

Well Lot #1 Unacceptable

Analysis Report

REPORT ON: Analysis of Water Samples

REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd. Suite 220 1755 Springfield Road Kelowna, B.C. V1Y 5v5

Att'n: Ms. Darlene Atkinson

CHAIN OF CUSTODY: PROJECT NAME: Friesen

731 87 SEBC

PROJECT NUMBER: 022-4140

( 0 9 : O L ) P g I S of 1 6

w CANTEST LTD.

Professional Analytical Services

4506 Canada Way Burnaby. B C. V5G 1 K5

FAX: 604 731 2386

TEL: 604 734 7276

1 800 665 8566

NUMBER OF SAMPLES: 2 REPORT DATE: August 19,2002

DATE SUBMITTED: August 9,2002 GROUP NUMBER: 30809091

SAMPLE TYPE: Water

NOTE: Test results contained in this repott refer only to the testing of samples submitted.

Aesthetic Objective Summary:

I / CLIENT SAMPLE ID I HEALTH I HARDNESS L I I I

ell Lot #1 I Acceptable I Hard

(Continued)

CANTEST LTD.

Tim Matsushita Coordinator, Water Laboratory

A Member ofthe w\wvI Group w w testing-labs.com

Page 1 of 15

n ~ r r

w ' A u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 PST b y :

CLIENT SAMPLE ID HEALTH HARDNESS

pe l1 Lot #Z Acceptable Hard L




(09:Ov Py 16 of 16

pH, Laboratory - pH analysis was performed in the laboratory using a pH meter. It must be recognized that the B.C. Ministry of Environment and other regulatory agencies recommend that pH be analyzed immediately upon sample collection. In light of this, pH measurements should be performed in the field.

Conventional Parameters - analyses were performed using procedures based on those described in "British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual For the Analysis of Water, Wastewater, Sediment and Biological Materials" (1994 Edition), Province of British Columbia and "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" 20th Edition, (1998), published by the American Public Health Association.

Metals in Water - analysis was performed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP), Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy (ICP/MS) or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry.

Microbiological Parameters - analyses were performed using procedures based on those described in "8. C. Environmental Laboratoty Manual For the Analysis of Water, Wastewater, Sediment and Biological Materials" (1994 Edition) and "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 20th Edition (1998). Analysis may be performed using either the MPN Method (reported as "Most Probable Number') or the Membrane Filtration (MF) Method (reported as "Colonies or CFU per unit volume"). Method selection is dependent upon factors including turbidity, microbial levels, etc.

TEST RESULTS;

(See following pages)

Page 2

associates md. - a100.gov.bc.caa100.gov.bc.ca/appsdata/acat/documents/r7858/ok169... ·...

Documents