asst rpt 1983 summer prosp€¦ · from baseline and line 20n to line 84n. this mag high assumed to...

42Ae5NE833e 2.6136 CARSCALLEN 010

RECEIVEDUtC 8

MINING SECiiON

ASSESSMENT REPORT ON THE GEORGE MARTIN PROPERTIES

1983 SUMMER PROSPECTING

PROGRAM, CARSCALLEN TOWNSHIP,

TIMMINS, ONTARIO

PORCUPINE; MINING DIVISION

[BE6IIVEDEC-61983V

A.M. P.M.

November, 1983 Rick Sproule

C. von Hessert S Associates Ltd, 49 Wellington Street East Toronto, Ontario M5E 1C9

(416) 863-6796

Maps in Back Pockets:

Drawing 2 Compilation of Geology and Geophysics @ !:4800

Drawing 3 Geology @ 1:2400

Drawing 4 Geochemical Soil Survey @ 1:2400

Drawing 5 Total Field Magnetic Contours, @ 1:2400

Drawing 6 VLF-EM Profiles @ 1:2400

Drawing 7 Filtered VLF-EM Contours @ 1:2400

LEGEND

Granitic rocks

Ultramafic rocks

Felsic Volcanic rocks

Mafic Volcanic rocks

Fault .

Anticline

Syncline

Original f~'\ Jowsey Denton

GEORGE MARTIN PROPERTIES

CARSCALLEN TOWNSHIP District of Cochrane

PROPERTY LOCATIONand

GENERAL GEOLOGYPrepored by: C von Hessert Drown by: R.T. M ond Assoc

October 1983 DWG. NoScale l' 31680

Regional Geology

Rocks underlying the George Martin properties are Precambrian in

age and belong to the Abitibi supergroup of volcanics and

associated granitic intrusives. The geology may be viewed on the

Cote-Eldorado Sheet, Ontario Department of Mines Map P118 or Map

359 and P23 also published by the Ontario Department of Mines Map

P118 or Map 35G andP 23 also published by the Ontario Department

of Mines (Ontario Geological Survey). The scale of these maps

ranges from l inch to 1/4 mile to l inch to l mile. A lack of

detail makes these maps poor guides to local geology. Broadly

speaking, the claims appear to be underlain by acid volcanics,

mafic volcanics, iron formation and greywacke.

Carscallen Township lies at the west end of the Porcupine-Destor

Fault where it eventually disappears. This structural feature is

of considerable economic importance because many of the gold mines

in the Timmins camp lie on, or within, a few kilometers of the

fault and are thought to be genetically related to it.

Late Precambrian diabase dykes striking roughly north-south and

crosscutting both volcanic and granitic intrusives are common in

Carscallen Township and the entire Timmins camp.

Results of the 1983 Exploration Program

The 1983 exploration program was initiated July 7 and was

completed by September 5, 1983. The program consisted of; 1)

establishing a control grid with lines spaced 400' apart,

totalling 17.5 line miles; 2) performing magnetometer and VLF-EM

surveys over the entire grid; 3) preparing a geologic mapping

survey of the southern half of the property; and 4) conducting

soil geochemical survey over a portion of the grid thought best

suited to returning usable data. Throughout this discussion, the

compilation map (Drawing No. 2, in the back pocket) will be used

for ease of reference.

1) Linecutting;

Linecutting began in early July of 1983. The grid has been

constructed with the baseline running north-south, intersected by

orthogonal picket lines every four hundred feet. Stations have

been chained and flagged every one hundred feet.

Because, in some instances, property boundaries are indeterminate

due to clear cut logging operations carried out subsequent to

staking, not all the grid lines may extend to the property

boundaries.

- 2 -

Magnetometer Survey

This survey was conducted using a geometrics total field proton

precession magnetometer. All readings were corrected for diurnal

variations. Readings of the magnetic field wre taken every one

hundred feet except in those areas where the change of field was

abnormally high. In these areas readings were taken every fifty

to twenty-five feet depending on the rate of, change.

The results of this survey are found on both the compilation map

and the contoured magnetometer survey map included with this

report. The plotting of the recorded data reveals three areas of

relatively high magnetic intensity.

The largest area located west of baseline trends north northwest

from baseline and line 20N to line 84N. This mag high assumed to

be the result of underlying iron formation forks just south of

line 48N at approximately 6W. This bifurcation is interpreted as

being a synformal structure created during regional folding.

The second mag feature is located east of the baseline. The mag

high is lenticular and trends in a north-northeast heading. This

feature is not the same intensity as the previously discussed area

and as a result is assumed to be caused by mafic volcanic flows.

The third area to give a high magnetic response is located in the

extreme northeast corner of the grid. This anomaly curves in a

trend heading just west of north; diagonally cutting approximately

six hundred feet of the grid. From reviews of submitted data for

the property adjoining to the north, this anomaly appears to be

the continuation of a north trending diabase dyke.

VLF-EM

This survey was conducted using a Geonics EM-16 radio receiver

tuned to the broadcast field of NAA (17.8 kHz). Data from this

survey is presented on included maps in three forms: 1) as plotted

profiles; 2) as filtered contoured data; and 3) as conductor axis

shown on the compilation map.

Examining the data as presented on the compilation map, Cutler

Mane, two sub-parallel conductor axis are seen to run coincident

with the mag high trend west of the baseline. These conductors

are assumed to be conductive clay layers possibly located along

bedding planes.

The conductor centered at 58+00N 10+00E trending in a northwest

direction is very weak. Due to the weak response and short strike

length (400 ft) the origin of this conductor is highly

speculative. Two of the most likely sources for this response are

- 4 -

a deep lying conductive sulphide or clay zone, or a slight change

in the conductivity of the overburden.

Another conductor striking in a northwest direction is found

trending from line 56+00N at approximately 39+00E to line 94+00N

at 16+00E. The conductor is not continuous over this entire

length due to changes in the shape of the grid caused by property

boundaries. The conductor in this case is believed to be

conductive clay within a fracture or along a lithologic contact.

A feature common to all the conductors discussed to this point is

a break in continuity between lines 56+00N and 60+00N. This break

is interpreted as being the result of faulting. This

interpretation is strengthened by coincident swellings and sharp

bends in the contoured magnetic data. This faulting is thought to

be a series of enechelon strike slip faults caused during regional

folding. These fault zones, in conjunction with favourable

inferred geology and combined geophysical anomalies, would make

prime diamond drill targets.

The last VLF conductor located on the grid is in the northeast

corner. This conductor roughly trends north and parallels the

west edge of a mag high. This magnetic feature is interpreted as

being a diabase dyke. If this interpretation is correct, then

this VLF conductor is probably the edge of this conductive body.

- 5 -

Geological Survey

The geological survey commenced August 5 and was completed August

12, 1983. The survey covered all lines from and including line

16+00N to and including line 52+00N. Since the line spacing is

relatively large, 400 feet, the area between the lines was covered

as best as possible. This was done by following outcrop trends,

checking all areas of either positive or negative relief. During

the course of mapping, six different rock types were identified

{see enclosed geology or compilation maps).

On a small scale the rock exposure is limited and suggests a

general trend of 60O . This heading is quite different from the

implied strike of 135 O found on a regional scale. This change in

attitude is best explained by the presence of the fault system

located during the geophysics surveys.

In general only a small area has any exposed rock. This area

ranges from line 30 to line 48 north and from 10 to 20+00W. The

percentage of rock exposure within this area is less than J.%.

The great majority of the area is covered by a veneer of primarily

sandy overburden. The thickness of this covering is estimated to

range from 0 to 20 feet in thickness. Year-round access to the

property is good. A major log haulage road connecting with

- 6 -

Highway 101 is located approximately one half mile to the west of

the property. From this road a well-maintained secondary haulage

road runs onto the property. This road forks in a couple of

places and because of this supplies vehicle access to the west

side of the property as well as providing a road which runs

sub-parallel to the baseline.

In all a total of 43 samples were sent in for analysis for gold.

None of the returned assay results were singularly impressive;

however, it must be remembered that only a very small amount of

rock was available for sampling. Carbonate alteration and pyritic

iron formation are found in outcrop. Both of these features are

associated with gold mineralization within the Timmins gold camp.

Geochemical Soil Survey

This survey was initiated to assist in locating mineralized zones

on trend with geophysical anomalies and in the vicinity of rock

outcrop. The survey covering lines 28 to 80 north started in

late August and was finished during the first week of September,

1983. Sample sites were at picketed stations located every 100

feet along the grid lines. Where possible, standard B horizon

soil samples at an average depth of one and one half feet were

collected using a hand auger. The collected sample was then

stored and shipped for gold analysis in a marked kraft paper bag.

- 7 -

When the assay results are plotted on the compilation map, the

anomalous samples are seen to trend coincident with the west limb

of the mag high trend. This trend adds strength to the

possibility of finding gold enriched mineralization within the mag

high interpreted iron formation.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Due to the encouraging lithology on the Martin claims, the

presence of gold associated with iron formation on the nearby

Jowsey Denton claims, and the occurrence of low but persistent

gold bearing iron formation and soils on the property, additional

work is warranted.

A program of fill-in linecutting, VLF, magnetic and horizontal

loop EM is recommended. Resulting anomalies of merit should be

tested by overburden and diamond drilling.

November 16, 1983Rick Sproule Geologist

- 8 -

Ministryof Report of WorkSeries (Geophysical, Geological,

Ontano Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act12A05NE0330 2.6136 CARSCALLEN

bwnship or

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

nCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days Ifor each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Geophysical l

- Electromagnetic '

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical i

Days per Claim

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

' Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

j Days per Claim

Airborne Credits l

Note: Special provisions i Electromagnetic credits do not apply

Days per Claim

to Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer

Radiometric

Expenditures (excludes power strippinglType o 1 Work Performed

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date

Ose.Recorded Holder or ApenlflSignature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix Number

l (.s06li

Expend. Days Cr,

-t

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

D

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Expend. Dayi Cr.

\ hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexeohereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name ar.d Postal Addrers of Person Certifying T? fVO

C . Date Certif.ed by (Signature)

Ministry olNaturalResources

Ontari;

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures) V?3

The Mining Act

Instructions: Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on This form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(t)

Z rfTownship o r Ares

Claim Holder(s) Prospector's Licence No.

A clarets

O

Survey Companyf

4 &o /r/?-Date of Survey (from fii to)

/6 BDay l Mo.

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

KiC4A*.e. /' &JAXJ-Z fy C

Day l Mo, l Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

Days perClaim

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

AirbornelCredits

Note: Special provisionscredits do not apply to Ajrborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

i Days per Claim

Days perClaim

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Expenditures (excludes power stripping!Type of Work Performed

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

fNumber

Expend. Days Cr.

Mil

Mining CifiimPrefix Number

REC

Expend. Days Cr.

W

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work anne or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

'eto. having performed the work

|

September 17, 1984 Our File: 2.6136 Your File: 263

Mr. Stephen C. wengle Wangle Associates 106 Adelaide Street West Chambers on Third Floor Toronto. Ontario M5H 1S2

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Geological and Geochemical Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P 649943 et al In the Township of Carscallen

In regard to your Inquiry of September 7, 1984 those deficiencies were corrected and the assessment work credits were approved as of July 10, 1984.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)966-4888

D. Isherwood:mc

cc: George Martin Suite 520736 Granville Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 1H8

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

•IMGLt flSSOCIflTKBARRISTERS and SOLICITORS

TELEPHONE: 364-7201

106 ADELAIDE STREET WEST CHAMBERS ON THIRD FLOOR TORONTO, CANADA M5H 1S2

HARVEY H. WENQLE, Q.C. STEPHEN C. WENQLE

REFER TO; 'Filerj#2J63

September 7th, 1984 -l J

Mr. F. W. Matthews,Ministry of Natural Resources,Room 6610,Whitney Block,Queen's Park,TORONTO, Ontario.M7A 1W3

Dear Sir;Re: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer),

Geological and Geochemical Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P649943 et al in the Township of Carscallen

Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a letter from the Ministry of Natural Resources to George Martin dated March 22nd, 1984 setting out certain deficiencies in the material filed for assessment work credit on the above-noted claims. Would you please advise as to whether the said deficiencies have been complied with.

\3 r ' ' f " j 'i'" r : Your irrmediate attention would be most appreciated. *' v- L ' v '

Yours very truly,

WENGLE ASSOCIATESit! 111 1 i i It L ni's ijj. ocii j \ J j'j

SCW/mc Encl.

'ntario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

March 22, 1984 Our File: 2.6136

Mr. George Martin \ Suite 520 JL 736 Granville Street v Vancouver, B.C. ^ V6Z 1H8

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer), Geological and Geochemical Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P 649943 et al in the Township of Carscallen

Enclosed are the Geological plans, 1n duplicate for the above-mentioned survey and Technical Data Statement Forms. Please have the author of the report complete the Technical Data Statement and colour code the designated geological outcrops and return all maps to this office as soon as possible.

Also, we are endeavouring to compile a list of qualifications of those persons who sign reports of geological, geochemical and geophysical surveys submitted to this Ministry for assessment work credits. It would be appreciated therefore, if you would please furnish a brief resume of your qualifications for our records.

For further information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at (416) 965-6918.

Yours sincerely,

y?

Yundt Director Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone:{416)965-6918

M.E. Anderson:mc

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

July 2 1984

C. VON HESSERT a ASSOCIATES LTD.

SUITE 3O6 - 45 RICHMOND STREET WEST

TORONTO, ONTARIO M5H 1ZZ

(416) 863-6796

Mr. F. W. Mathews Room 6610 Whitney Block Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario

Dear Mr. Mathews

Re: George Martin Assessment Submission Your file 2.6136

Enclosed is information requested in a letter to our client from Mr. S.E. Yundt, dated March 22,1984.

We regret the delay in returning this data to you. However, Mr. Martin has been out of the country and he did not forward the letter to us until late in June.

If there should be any more deficiencies with this assessment submission, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Richard M. Sproule Geologist

lwS

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUc.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Stirvpy^y/r)^ T fr

Township o Claim Hold

Survey Con Author of F Address of Covering D;

Total Miles

SPECIAL

r Area L AA.Z t,dLLl-J\J

er(s) (7&0&6IL

ipany I .* U6jJ J

leport A '''' -

Author &Z 3^6

ites of Survey V*

nf Line Hilt

PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNI Magnetome

nATF.ry^tu

Res. Geol.

//JIATJA)

/6fS6Ar 4 fasexjjtl&s 2.LJ.5/KVK-A^

•46 tfc#*t*0 gc .UL TZ/toAJfdt ~ j /j jU Y r y *1I j f toe z.y (linecuttiiQ! to office) /•O ^Ct/etA/

DAYS- , . . per claim Geophysical

JjA-Electromagnetic " ~., , ,,,.,

— Rnrti"nKtric , ,-n|K*.r

Geological —— iLQ ——————drnrhrrYii™]

j CREDITS (Special provijion crediti do not apply to airborne turveyi)

ter F.Wrrnmagnetir Rarlinmrtrir(enter day* per claim)

*, JtoAi s ifiNATTTRF.. ^̂ /y^f&AMiK

Previous SurveysFile No.

Author bf'Repffrt or Agent

Qualifications

Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

f ^9t?3- (prefix) . (number)

^O jm f t^^j rf TT ^

p itetefP bSofrt-f bZoSt*.

1 Ol AL CLAIMS ———— LJ. ———————

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS -- If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations Station interval.—— Profile scale ___L

370

TZ

Contour interval /OO

.Number of Readings 3 ?O i JLine spacing 7*?^ T *

Instrument B/ Z

Accuracy — Scale constant, Diurnal correction method.

r, - ft.

Base Station check-in interval (hours)- Base Station location and value /*//'

S/teCJJSS/inJ

be* MM f. A f.t., /fa A D

JX.-f UL*v*J. a

HIS zo

swj w

Instrument Coil'

6* Z 'H li

Coil separationAccuracy. Method: 0 Fixed transmitter

HA.D Shoot back O In line D Parallel line

Parameters measured /fl/ f(specify V.L.F. station)

of

O

InstrumentScale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

ZoHH

H•*!N1— 1

rt

5oOiQEIDQ2

^

g

on•H

MK!

Instrument —————————— Method D Time DomainParameters — On time .

- Off timetime.

time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

CD Frequency Domain— Frequency ——^—.

—- Range ________

SELF POTENTIALInstrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method -^——————^—^-^—————————^^^^—.—...——.—-..——-——

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument —-—-Values measured.

Energy windows (levels)-———^—^^——^——^^———————^^^^^^—.-.....——.——Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector——^—-————————-——————————————————^—^-—Overburden ——————————————————^^-——————.——.^^—-..—.—.——.——

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey—————^-^^^———————————Instrument _________________________Accuracy——^——^-——^^——-—-——————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)———— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey)Accuracy_________________

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used—-—-————^————.———————.—————————

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D

p. p. m. Dp. p. b. D

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others ___________________________Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory Analysis No. ___________

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.———.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used ——.

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method- Analytical Method —— Reagents Used—————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General. General.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File X '

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT lFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT !

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. |

Type of Survey(s) Township or Claim Holder(s)

W A FJGGtf

/fa AT/A)

Survey Company. Author of Report Address of Author

/T- /f'

Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cut—

7 RI

Jf.

(linecutting'to

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

So—Radiometric.-Other————Geological.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit, do not apply to airborne turveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic . Radiometric

DATE:

(enter dayi per claim)

SIGNATURE:Author of/Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

JL.1.

(prefix)

f.,"LL. A.

.L

.t I..

(number)

M9.7.X.7...

A&.&.

s

l!

j

B

TOTAL CLAIMS. 1L

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey \Number of Stations.

Station interval ™—Profile scale —-——.

Te*,C

.Number of Readings b.*7 *"

JLine spacing fOo f* ft, c

Contour interval.

U

C

Instrument. 6 Bil A IQtJ

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.

*" *-M f* V' V Kt

Station check-in interval (hours) fe

Base Station location and value p * ft fo6St06 /e*6 HiJIW.A&& e,40/?e, to t A/7 f/JSt,

ELECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument U 6

Coil separation .

Accuracy.

Method:Frequency N H H

Parameters measured

OfiJlCsS C*'™ t /6

CD'Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back L3 In line d Parallel line

Cutfu/i H/t/fJC(specify V.L.F. station)

/AJffASe. i OtKf A f {MASK. (GtuA0AjrTu.iLf J *SK*IA± r

Instrument,

Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

2O

< N1— 1

Di

~

M O DQ ZHH

^fcjt-H

Zx

Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain

Parameters - On time Frequency .. .. .. .... ,...

-Off time ,, Range

— Delay time— Integration time

Powder ————————————————————————————————————————————

Electrode array ———— . ———————————————————————————————————— - ————— - ———————————

Electrode spacing ————— - — - ————————————————————————————————— - —— - — — — ——— — —— — ~—

Tvoe of electrode . , . ... , — ————————————————————————————————————— - — ——

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument_______________________________________ Range.Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.^-^—Values measured .

Energy windows (levels) -————^——-———————.—————.^—^^^-^^..-^———

Height of instrument____________________________Background Count.

Size of detector—————.—-——^^—-—-—^—-—..—————^^^^—^..-^—^—.

Overburden ̂ ^^——^-.—^—^^-..-————-————-.——.-.—.—.^^^..—-—-^-.^—.—(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey,————^-^——-——^——————————

Instrument .^^^^————-.———^^^^——————

Accuracy__________________________

Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)————

Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy-—-—————————...-—.(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used-^-^^—^——^-————————————^—^—.——.——.

Sensor altitude.

Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight———————

Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————

Terrain—————————

Drainage Development————————————

Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent O

p. p. m. Op. p. b. D

Cu, Pb,

Others

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method-

Reagents Used——Field Laboratory Analysis

No. .—————————

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory_ Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used —————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraLGeneral.

Richard M. Sproule 3 53 Lake Street, Grimsby, Ontario.L3M 1Z9

Phone (416) 945-1099

Geologist: Mineral Exploration, with experience in all aspects of exploration for gold, base metals and uranium, in eastern and western Canada.

Employment History:

1983 - present; Contract Geologist Ontario Primarily employed by C. von Hessert S AssociatesLtd.

Responsible for comprehensive, cost effective gold exploration programs for various clients.

Supervised And conducted geological, geophysical and geochemical surveys; claim staking, trenching and diamond drilling.

Prepared reports for exploration companies and government agencies.

1980 - 1983; Asamera Inc. Saskatoon

Geologist in an exploration team exploring a million acre property, with an average annual budget of $5 million, helped to prove ore reserves of the Dawn Lake Uranium Project.

As a project geologist, supervised a base metal exploration program on a 300,000 acre property and a variety of other assignments.

1979; COMINCO Ltd. Toronto

Party chief of a field crew on a regional search for gold, tin, tungsten, molybdenum and uranium in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

1978; Chevron Resources Vancouver

Party chief responsible for a base metal exploration program in Nova Scotia.

May - September 1977; Chevron Resources Vancouver

Part of a field crew on a regional search for base metals.

- 2 -

Employment History (continued)

May - December 1976; Esso Minerals (consultantP.E.Schenk) Halifax

Research assistant on a research program designed to determine the depositional origin of the Gay's River lead zinc ore body.

Education:

BSc. Geology (4yr) Dalhousie University 1979.

Personal:

Born 1949, Canadian Citizen.

REGISTERED

1984006 21 Filet 2.6136

Mr. George Martin t Suite 520736 Granville Street Vancouver, B.C. V62 1H8

Dear Sir:

RE i Geophysical (Electromagnetic S Magnetometer) Geological 6 Geochemical Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P 649943 et al in the Township of Carscallen.

Enclosed is a copy of our letter dated March 22, 1984 requesting additional information for the above-described survey.

Unless you can provide the required data by July 3, 1984, the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the work credits recorded on December 2, 1983..

For further information, please contact Mr. Ray Pichette at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone; (416)965-1380

S. Hursttsc

cci Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

March 22, 1984 Our File: 2.6136

Mr. George Martin Suite 520736 Granvllle Street Vancouver* B.C. V6Z 1H8

Dear Sir:RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer), Geological and Geochemical Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P 649943 et al In the Township of Carscallen

Enclosed are the Geological plans, 1n duplicate for the above-mentioned survey and Technical Data Statement Forms. Please have the author of the report, complete the Technical Data Statement and colour code the designated geological outcrops and return all maps to this office as soon as possible.Also, we are endeavouring to compile a list of qualifications of those persons who sign reports of geological, geochemical and geophysical surveys submitted to this Ministry for assessment work credits. It would be appreciated therefore, If you would please furnish a brief resume of your qualifications for our records.For further Information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at (416) 965-6918.

Yours sincerely.

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918M.E. Anderson:necc: Mining Recorder Ttamlns, Ontario

Ontario

Ministryof Geotechnical Natural Report

Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Comments

l l Approved | ] W ish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

o: Geology - Expenditures

pproved [ ) Wish to see again with corrections

To: Geochemistry

Comments

l l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

l [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

1593 I81S1D)

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalRestttfces

GeotechnicalReportApproval

File

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics Ir.K.&^UComments

[^Approved Q Wish to see again with corrections

\^To: Geology- Expenditures n [j , C . - WTW(

Comments

j l Approved | | Wish to see again with corrections

To: Geochemistry

Comments

Date^/^. -"7

Date Signature

j ] Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

15&3 191 S) D)

Initial Check

Assessed

Approved Reports of Work sent out

Notice of Intent filed

Approval after Notice of Intent sent out

Duplicate sent to Resident Geologist

Duplicate sent to A.F.R.O.

1983 12 14 2.6136

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Geological and Geochemical survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on mining claims P 649943 et al 1n the Township of Carscallen.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours very truly,

E. F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

A. Barr:me

cc: George Martin Suite 520786 Granvllle Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 1H8

cc: C. von Hessert 4 Associates Ltd 49 Wellington Street East Toronto, Ontario M5E 1C9

'W**9î*faajinn i,' ^ f'—K-*—,

COCHRANE

-'- aPORCUINE

MINING DIVISION

- -,t v-'-v*''. J s, :: . '

!^k**wkv* tf/'irrr;*?;^^r;^|^'^;;p#S*q^* ?^ljSgj^*f9sp to5:, ,.j^.,.,A~.*i3Mh;j-****'- i^*f-.*a**j'9c™ v .i^.teri*..

••V^'* j^;'-^ :Hf*^.-;:p"'f': "" "" T"' !*"

4ga*p*'v*ssw ^^/7 !"4it4î^^^

muPbttoWf**^ KS ^ - -'* ,..^-^.,^—,..,'-n.-. r—w-ri-4-''-*-'~ - H ^

,.-' -, ^Hrti^Vr^w.,,^-^!. ,^;y^mW-*- .*,j54

^ 8*9^."*

•pj.-..'^.:, -.j'-,:, a-..,.x., f- \ÎK^r-^r *:a^..^*3*i- .^^F- :;f-F '^^'fcij.?^^"--', i ^'-^rî^r ;' .;- ^-"^•INMke^;***!,;*^.-... ;?"^^r ^r -fca^^^^^^Nf*-^vftî'*t* | ---; 'y^'^^^^^^ ifc-^^^-tivua^^î^-âa^Ll-.,_,^ 'ITXsJ-lffi^KLiSsss?*^^ ^^^1.,...^^,.,^,;.-.'V •v^-V'-.:: •••*y -, l ^. -, .i-::- .-.v; - ; ^ -. .••-,-:; /v:^ ,,;. . :;.:.;- -v .. ; ' . - ,. * -;- ;. -^'t

Denton Twp - M 273;-*

f4AMW*(K^^

Pt,AN 'NOMWi

KV O?' M'- Vi. 'K

^^^

42Aa5NE833a 2.6136 CARSCALLEN 200

so

32 N

LEGEND

94 N

92 N

Probable Diabase Dyke

88 N

68 N

64 N

60 N

b

——^ 56 N

Overburden . . . , . . . . . . .

Diabase . . . . . . . . .

Granite . . . . . . . . . . .

Volcano Clastic . . . . . . . .

Felsic Volcanics . . . . . . .

Iron Formation . . . . . . . .

Intermediate Volcanics . . . .

Assumed Geological Boundaries

d

G

Ve

Fv

If

lv

V.L.F. E , M. Conductor Axis with Designation . . . . . . . .

59,500 gamma Mag. Contour .

Au in Soils - 5-10 PPB

Au in Soils - *ll PPB.

Assumed Fault . . . . . . . . .

Inferred Synform Axis . . . . . .

Outline of Soil Geochem. Survey

O

O 400 800 1200

feet

SCALE l'4800



COMPILATION OF GEOLOGY, GEOPHYSICS AND GEOCHEMISTRY

Prepared by: C. von Hessert

Drawn by - R . T. Marcroft S Assoc.

Date: November 1983

Drawing No.: 2

42A 05NE0330 2 . 6 ,36 CARSCALLEN

210

84 N

80 N

7,6 N

Grani t e Sou l d e r s

52 N

LEGEND200-fe

400 600

QUATERNARY Pleistocene and Recent

Trench. feet

SCALE h 2400Outcrop

PRECAMBRIAN Matachewan

Diabase . .

Geological Boundary (known and inferred ) . . . . . . . . . . .

Algoman

Granite , Quartz Porphyry

Keewatin

Iron Formation. . . . .

Rock Sample No. .

Sample Assay No.

Road . , . . .

, GM2O 3299

-a

Fragmental Lava , Breccia and Pyroclastics . . . . . . .

Intermediate Lava . . . .

If

Ve

lv

Swamp or Muskeg

Tree l i ne

o s

o

CD > Wm



GEOLOGY

Prepared by : C.von Hessert

Drawn by : R.T. Marcroft B Assoc.

Date- November 1983

Drawing No. : 3

42A 05NE*330 2 , 6 ,36 CARSCALLEN

84 N

80 N

76 N

52 N

LEGEND

Gold analysis in PPB

0-5 PPB.........

6 - 10 PPB.........

II - 25 PPB. ........

<26PPB....

O 200 400 600

OOO

feet

SCALE 1-2400

o o

CD

m



GEOCHEMICAL SOIL SURVEY

Prepared by- C.von Hessert

Drawn by ; R.T. Marcroft ft Assoc.

Date- November 1983

Drawing No. : 4

2. e 136 CARSCALLEN 230

v,,

O)

94 N

84 N

80 N

76 N

52 N

LEGEND

Readings above base level of 59,000 gammas

Contour interval .. .... .,.. . . . .100 gammas

100 gamma contour

500 gamma contour

Depression.

200 400 600

o

CD

O)m


CARSCALLEN TOWNSHIP

District of Cochrane

TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC CONTOURS

Prepared by ; C.von Hessert

Drawn by : R.T. Marcroft S Assoc.

^ November 1983

Drawing No.-' 5

42A05NE0338 2.6136 CARSCALLEN

84 N

80 N

76 N —

^ -* * / ^

52 N

LEGEND

Instrument. .. ......,.......... Geonics EM-16

Transmitter ,... , ,.NAA,Cutler,Maine, 17 8kHz

Readings plotted..... . ....... -^

Profiles, l" ^ 4070 , plotted... *. p

Inphase profile .... ., . . ...... -————-———-

Quadrature profile . .., ...... -—— — - — — -

O 200 400 600

feet

SCALE h 2400

o o

mw m

m



VLF EM PROFILES

Prepared by: C.vonHessert

Drawn by ; R.T. Marcroft a Assoc.

Date: November 1983

Drawing No. : 6

42A05NE0330 2.6136 CARSCALLEN 250

asst rpt 1983 summer prosp€¦ · from baseline and line 20n to line 84n. this mag high assumed to...

Documents