astana expo city 2017 - aia professional

American Institute of Architects 2016 Tap Innovation Award

ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017

American Institute of Architects 2016 Tap Innovation Award 2


PositivEnergy Practice MEP Engineering, Parametric Modeling

V3 Companies Civil Engineering

Werner Sobek Structural Engineering

Studio Altieri Structural and MEP Engineering

GEI Consultants Geotechnical Engineering

AON Fire and Life Safety, Security

Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. Wind Engineering

Fortune Consultants Vertical Transportation

Altitude Façade Access Consulting Façade Access

Charcoal Blue Theater Consulting, Acoustics

CASE Building Information Specialist

Sembol Construction Contractor

Planning Partnership Landscape Architecture

IT Engineering Design Manager

Project Team

Energy Hall Rendering

Overall Project Rendering


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Project Narrative

The Astana Expo City 2017 master plan embraces the designated concept of “Future Energy.” International expositions are held every 2-3 years and choose specialized themes that generates the discourse of the architecture, events, and demonstrations of the event. Future Energy is aimed at finding ways to achieve qualitative changes in the energy sector, primarily for the development of alternative sources of energy and transportation.

Finding sustainable energy supplies is a critical and growing global concern. The solution to these concerns ensures economic growth and improved social standards while reducing the burden on the environment.

Currently under construction, Astana Expo City 2017 will embrace the Expo’s focus by becoming the first post Industrial Revolution city, where all energy consumed by the Expo community will be provided from renewable sources; where buildings were designed to be generators of power that will be distributed and stored by a smart-grid system.



Kazakhstan Pavilion Interior Rendering

Covered Mall Interior Rendering

Project Narrative

The ultimate goal for the site was to reduce the overall energy demand by using both passive and active strategies. The design team executed a series of studies focused on minimizing the site’s energy-use while maximizing the energy-harvesting potential and user-comfort levels. The results dictated the most efficient orientation of the site—and each individual building—in order to optimize the strategies that will reduce the overall energy usage of the Expo community.

All opportunities for power generation were investigated and several were incorporated into the building-design guidelines, including high-performance glazing that will maximize solar heat gain in winter while providing shading in summer; energy piles that will reduce energy demand and provide temperature modulation during winter; energy storage capacity that can meet two days of emergency demand; 100% of rainfall from a 100-year storm event managed on site; and 90% of waste generated on site will be diverted from a landfill.

A significant part of the energy consumed by the Expo community will be provided from renewable sources that were determined by site-specific indicators such as weather conditions, cultural context, and land accessibility. The forms of the buildings were design to reduce their energy needs, allowing the buildings to operate as ‘power plants’ that will harness energy from the sun and/or wind while additionally saving significant energy through the combined use of passive strategies.

The resulting site-wide infrastructure concept fully integrates the occupants, buildings, and utilities through the use of a smart-energy grid, a smart recycled-water grid, an integrated waste-management system, and an inter-seasonal underground thermal energy storage system. The grid’s goal is to manage the Expo community’s sustainability goals including peak and total energy-demand reduction, water reduction, and waste-to-landfill reduction.



Split into two phases, the 430 acre project will feature exhibition and cultural pavilions, a residential development, service areas including shopping, socio-cultural, educational and civic facilities, parks, and parking.

Phase I includes the design and construction of the exposition buildings including the central Kazakhstan Sphere, Theme, Corporate, and International Pavilions, as well as hotel, residential, retail, and art and performance spaces. Phase I will be completed by June 2017 to serve the world’s next international exposition.

Phase II will be the construction of a legacy development for the site. The innovative reuse of the Expo site was conceived during the initial design phase. The Expo buildings will be converted into an office and research park, attracting international companies and entrepreneurs. Expo parking and service zones will be transformed into thriving and integrated neighborhoods.

The reuse of the Expo site was an innovative concept conceived during the initial design phase. A major environmental issue with exposition-

type events is that they are used for only an initial run and often remain vacant indefinitely. In researching the fate of previous sites, the design team learned that the approval needed for a legacy development is often difficult and lengthy to obtain from the client perspective due to upfront fundraising.

The design team worked with the client to develop a master plan and architectural design guidelines that would complete most of the post-expo mode components in such a way that a significant amount of public funding would not need to be obtained to fund a functioning post-expo community. The master plan was developed to allow private investment to complete the required tasks such as the residential neighborhood, educational, and office complex.

The team approached the project focusing on the design of a high-performing and integrated post-expo community. While the three month exposition phase was the immediate goal, once concluded the Expo site will transition into a permanent development that serves the needs of a 21st Century community.

Post-Expo Legacy Development

Edge Park

Wind Turbines

Residential

Civic Corridor

Expo Park

Residential

Central PlantNorth PlazaCongress Hall/Conference

Center/ VIP Reception

Grand Park

Offices

Offices

Congress Hotel

Performing Arts CenterKazakhstan Pavilion

Congress OfficeGrand PlazaCovered StreetEast And West EntranceTaxi Stand

Edge Park

School

Residential ParkingResidential

South Plaza

PV Array Buffer Zone

Illustrated Project Site Plan



The post-expo or legacy development will be one of the most sustainably built communities in the world, when completed in 2018. Key areas taken into account for the efficient transformation from expo to post-expo mode include:

• Streets, sidewalks, and landscaping are designed to be functionally integrated without demolition or reconstruction work

• Buffer zones have been planned around the expo residential neighborhoods to create a more intimate and comfortable residential experience with a separation from main roads around the expo city

• Schools are included in the post-expo master plan to serve the diverse needs of future community

• Exhibition buildings will be transformed and integrated into a first-class office complex

• The site will also be pedestrian and bicycle oriented with dedicated walking and bike lanes

• Connections to public transit will be available to link the expo site to the rest of Astana and an additional bus rapid transit route is currently under development

Post-Expo RenderingPost-Expo Interior Rendering

N1.3

N1.4

N1.2

E1.2

E1.1E2

J1

J2

D1.2

D1.1

D1.3

D2

K1

L1.1

B1

B2.4

B2.2

L1.4

L1.5 L1.3

X1

X3

X2

X4

M1.1

M1.3

M1.2

M1.4

M2.1

M2.2

M3

M2.3

P2

P1

P1

S15S14

S16S17

S19S18

S20S21

Q1

C4.4

C4.3

C4.2C4.1 C3.4

C3.3

C3.2

C3.1

C1.1C1.2

C1.3

C2.1

C2.2

C2.3

C1.4

C2.4

C3.6C4.5

C4.6 C3.5

AA1 AA2 AA3 AA4 AA5 AA6

Y1

Y1

W1AA7

AA8

L1.7L1.2

Z1 Z1 Z1Z1

B2.3

AA9

B2.1

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14 T15

L4.1 L5.1

L4.2

L4.3L5.4

L4.4

L6.1

L6.2

L6.3

L7.1 L7.2

L7.3

L7.4

L7.5

L8.1L3.1

L11.1

L8.2

L8.3

L11.2

L8.4L13.1

L9.2

L9.1

L10.1

L5.3L5.5L5.5

L11.3

L12.2

L12.3

L12.4L12.5

L3.2L2.1

L3.3

L3.4

L3.5

L3.6

L3.7

L3.8

L3.9

L3.10

L2.2

L2.3

L2.4

L2.5

L2.6

L2.7

L2.8

L2.9

L2.10L2.11

L2.12

L2.13

L2.14L2.15

L2.16

L2.17

L2.18

L12.1

L5.2

L5.6

Z1 Z1

S1 T1 T2

T3 T4

T5

T6 T7

T8 T9

S2

S4

S9

S11

S5

S8S7

S12S13

S3

S10

S6

SCOPE 103SITE-WIDE ENERGY GENERATION WIND TURBINES/VERTICAL FARM WIND TURBINES PHOTOVOLTAIC ON GRADE

SCOPE 102SITE-WIDE PUBLIC REALM AND EXTERIOR FACILITIES

SCOPE 101SITE-WIDE INFRASTRUCTURE UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TUNNELS

SCOPE 202INTERNATIONAL AND THEMATIC PAVILIONS INTERNATIONAL PAVILIONS THEMATIC PAVILIONS CORPORATE PAVILIONS INT’L & THEMATIC PAVILIONS COMMERCIAL

SCOPE 203CORPORATE AND AGENCY PAVILIONS EBPA PAVILION - ENERGY BEST PRACTICE AREA INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES & NGO PAVILION CORPORATE & AGENCY PAVILIONS COMMERCIAL

SCOPE 204AMPHITHEATER, ART CENTER AND ND STAGE ART CENTER OPEN AUDITORIUM/AMPHITHEATER NATIONAL DAY VENUE STAGE

SCOPE 300ENERGY DISCOVERY CENTER

SCOPE 301EXPO OFFICES AND WAREHOUSE EXPO OFFICES WAREHOUSE

SCOPE 303CONGRESS CENTER AND HOTEL CONGRESS CENTER CONGRESS HOTEL CONGRESS OFFICE

SCOPE 302COVERED STREET RETAIL OFFICE

SCOPE 305EXPO PRECINCT MISC. BUILDINGS PRECINCT COMMERCIAL CIVIC BUILDINGS

APPENDIX 1- SCOPE ELEMENT DIAGRAM - EXPO PHASE

SCOPE 205EXPO SITE MISC. COMPONENTS VISITOR ENTRANCES VIP ENTRANCE SERVICE ENTRANCE MISC. KIOSKS

SCOPE 200EXPO SITE LOWER LEVEL SUB ZERO LEVEL ZERO LEVEL SLAB

ISSUED: 2014.06.05

SCOPE 306TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS BUS TERMINAL TAXI TERMINAL

SCOPE 304 EXPO PRECINCT RESIDENTIAL

RETAIL BELOW RESIDENTIAL

X/Z

AA

A

B

C

D/E

J/K

L

Q

P

M

N

ST

V

W/YSCOPE 201

THE SPHERE AND ASSOCIATED BUILDINGS KAZAKHSTAN AND ASTANA PAVILION SPHERE COMMERIAL ENERGY HALL SPHERE COVERED MALL

N 0

20 100

50 200

N1.3

N1.4

N1.2

E1.2

E1.1E2

J1

J2

D1.2

D1.1

D1.3

D2

K1

L1.1

B1

B2.4

B2.2

L1.4

L1.5 L1.3

X1

X3

X2

X4

M1.1

M1.3

M1.2

M1.4

M2.1

M2.2

M3

M2.3

P2

P1

P1

S15S14

S16S17

S19S18

S20S21

Q1

C4.4

C4.3

C4.2C4.1 C3.4

C3.3

C3.2

C3.1

C1.1C1.2

C1.3

C2.1

C2.2

C2.3

C1.4

C2.4

C3.6C4.5

C4.6 C3.5

AA1 AA2 AA3 AA4 AA5 AA6

Y1

Y1

W1AA7

AA8

L1.7L1.2

Z1 Z1 Z1Z1

B2.3

AA9

B2.1

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14 T15

L4.1 L5.1

L4.2

L4.3L5.4

L4.4

L6.1

L6.2

L6.3

L7.1 L7.2

L7.3

L7.4

L7.5

L8.1L3.1

L11.1

L8.2

L8.3

L11.2

L8.4L13.1

L9.2

L9.1

L10.1

L5.3L5.5L5.5

L11.3

L12.2

L12.3

L12.4L12.5

L3.2L2.1

L3.3

L3.4

L3.5

L3.6

L3.7

L3.8

L3.9

L3.10

L2.2

L2.3

L2.4

L2.5

L2.6

L2.7

L2.8

L2.9

L2.10L2.11

L2.12

L2.13

L2.14L2.15

L2.16

L2.17

L2.18

L12.1

L5.2

L5.6

Z1 Z1

S1 T1 T2

T3 T4

T5

T6 T7

T8 T9

S2

S4

S9

S11

S5

S8S7

S12S13

S3

S10

S6

SCOPE 103SITE-WIDE ENERGY GENERATION WIND TURBINES/VERTICAL FARM WIND TURBINES PHOTOVOLTAIC ON GRADE

SCOPE 102SITE-WIDE PUBLIC REALM AND EXTERIOR FACILITIES

SCOPE 101SITE-WIDE INFRASTRUCTURE UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TUNNELS

SCOPE 202INTERNATIONAL AND THEMATIC PAVILIONS INTERNATIONAL PAVILIONS THEMATIC PAVILIONS CORPORATE PAVILIONS INT’L & THEMATIC PAVILIONS COMMERCIAL

SCOPE 203CORPORATE AND AGENCY PAVILIONS EBPA PAVILION - ENERGY BEST PRACTICE AREA INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES & NGO PAVILION CORPORATE & AGENCY PAVILIONS COMMERCIAL

SCOPE 204AMPHITHEATER, ART CENTER AND ND STAGE ART CENTER OPEN AUDITORIUM/AMPHITHEATER NATIONAL DAY VENUE STAGE

SCOPE 300ENERGY DISCOVERY CENTER

SCOPE 301EXPO OFFICES AND WAREHOUSE EXPO OFFICES WAREHOUSE

SCOPE 303CONGRESS CENTER AND HOTEL CONGRESS CENTER CONGRESS HOTEL CONGRESS OFFICE

SCOPE 302COVERED STREET RETAIL OFFICE

SCOPE 305EXPO PRECINCT MISC. BUILDINGS PRECINCT COMMERCIAL CIVIC BUILDINGS

APPENDIX 1- SCOPE ELEMENT DIAGRAM - EXPO PHASE

SCOPE 205EXPO SITE MISC. COMPONENTS VISITOR ENTRANCES VIP ENTRANCE SERVICE ENTRANCE MISC. KIOSKS

SCOPE 200EXPO SITE LOWER LEVEL SUB ZERO LEVEL ZERO LEVEL SLAB

ISSUED: 2014.06.05

SCOPE 306TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS BUS TERMINAL TAXI TERMINAL

SCOPE 304 EXPO PRECINCT RESIDENTIAL

RETAIL BELOW RESIDENTIAL

X/Z

AA

A

B

C

D/E

J/K

L

Q

P

M

N

ST

V

W/YSCOPE 201

THE SPHERE AND ASSOCIATED BUILDINGS KAZAKHSTAN AND ASTANA PAVILION SPHERE COMMERIAL ENERGY HALL SPHERE COVERED MALL

N 0

20 100

50 200


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Project - Scale

The Expo site will be designed for two different phases: Phase 1 or the “Expo Mode” will attract 60,000-100,000 visitors each day and will include the design and construction of a series of buildings that will act as a covered city, which will include retail, residential and office spaces; as well as the central Kazakhstan Pavilion; Theme, Corporate and International Pavilions; and art and performance spaces. Phase 2, or the “Legacy Mode”, will see the site converted into an office and research park, attracting international companies and entrepreneurs. Expo parking and service zones will be transformed into integrated neighborhoods with an additional 700 residential units, and office, hotel, civic and educational facilities.

Overall Construction Site Photograph

Scope Element Diagram - Expo Phase

TEST PILE PROGRAM - DRIVEN PILES TEST PILE PROGRAM - BORED PILES

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

MEP DESIGN

CONSTRUCTION

2013 2014 201510 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03

SCHEMATIC

SCHEMATICCONCEPT

CONCEPT

CONCEPT

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC

PILING LOWER LEVEL TEST PILE PROGRAM - DRIVEN PILES TEST PILE PROGRAM - BORED PILES

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

MEP DESIGN

CONSTRUCTION

2013 2014 201510 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Project - Schedule

Construction August 2014

Due to a predetermined, fixed date for the opening of the Astana Expo, there was no room for error in the design process. The complex project demanded an aggressive ‘Hyper-track’ approach with an overlapping design and construction process, starting early in the SD Phase. Building Information Modeling (BIM) made it possible to deliver a working, coordinated set of design documents that met the accelerated schedule and promoted a high level of design communication. In many cases design ran parallel to construction.

One of the challenges of the twelve month design and documentation process was the development of a high-performance building envelope that could function equally well in a series of orientations from northeast clockwise to southwest. The targets dictated that we reduce the grid-energy demand by at least 50% against an ASHRAE 90.1 (2010) baseline and generate a significant amount of electricity using building integrated photovoltaic systems that feed back to the local grid.


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Project - Team

The large design team of over 80 architects managed the work of an international team and served as the primary client contact. The extended project team consisted of consultants from 10 different countries, so tight virtual coordination was the key to its success. Web based video conferences were held on a weekly basis to keep the design on track, and Monthly in-person workshops were held in Astana with the client and various consultants.

The design team understood from the onset of the project that their role as architects and planners would go beyond the delivery of a design. As architects and planners we know that we have a responsibility to advance the profession and to work toward a higher standard for urban development and architectural design, but without full client support these goals are often unachievable.

The design team was able to work closely with the client and the governments in Astana and Kazakhstan to develop urban planning and design guidelines that in many instances challenged the established standards, obsolete codes and regulations that are often faced in parts of the world. The team shared prior experiences with the client, heads of state, and other public agencies, insuring that the most up-to-date sustainability guidelines and principles were followed. Through patience and compromise the team was able to successfully procure and implement a plan for a sustainable community that is capable of catalyzing city development in an innovative way.


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Process - Documentation

Rendering February 2014 Revit Model January 2015 Construction Site June 2016

Physical Model 2014Preliminary Sketch 2014

Given the various project constraints, the tight schedule and the scale of the project, the team had to start creating, coordinating and managing documentation quickly. A comprehensive Expo City Revit Model took shape by piecing together the individual building models inside the overall framework model. The inherent connectivity of the Expo City made the scope of work for every single building extend past its property lines, making the data exchange between all models essential in every drawing issued.

A-1 BASEMENT

MASTER PLAN

B-1 KAZAKHSTAN PAVILION

B-2 COVERED MALL

J-2 ART CENTER

N PARCEL

Y-1 TAXI TERMINAL

L-1 ENTRANCES

L-2 KIOSKS

INTERIOIR

SITE GRID COORDINATION

PROJECT SET OUT

EXPO CITY

C-1 CORE

C-1 EXT WALL

C-1 ROOF

C-2 CORE

C-2 EXT WALL

C-2 ROOF

C-3 CORE

C-3 EXT WALL

C-3 ROOF

C-4 EXT WALL

C-4 ROOF

C EXT WALL

B-1 EXT WALL

B-1 STRUCTURE

B-1 CORE

B-2 EXT WALL

C-1 INTERNATIONAL PAVILION



C THEMATIC PAVILIONS

B-2.3 ENERGY HALL

N1.1 CONGRESS OFFICE

N1.2 CONGRESS HOTEL

N1.3 CONGRESSN1.3 EXT WALL

N1.3 INT WALL

N1.2 EXT WALL

N1.1 EXT WALL




The Documentation consisted of 1647 sheets generated within 42 Revit Models over the documentation period of 8 months. The Chicago-based design team worked in the same digital space with a constant feedback from changes in the various building models. The use of BIM allowed the design team to work collectively in the virtual environment, getting real-time feedback on changes-a virtue which was essential for meeting the demands of the scale and speed of the project.

Expo Ciry Revit Model

Expo Ciry Revit Model Heirarchy

3 45

67

8

9

10

11

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

12

20

28

18.5

21.5

29.5

S

R

Q

P

N

M

L

K

J

1AC3.3 AE-2700

1AC3.3 AE-2701

1AC3.3 AE-2702

1AC3.4 AE-2701

1AC3.4 AE-2702

1AC3.4 AE-2700

1AC3.3 AE-2703

7700

8300

8300

8300

8300

8300

8300

80001000

1AC3.3 AE-2701

1AC3.3 AE-2702

1AC3.4 AE-2701

1AC3.4 AE-2702

1AC3.4 AE-2703

68% DN

89% DN

SLOPE DN 65% 74% DN

SLOPE DN 39% 40% DN

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

MTL-07 RIDGELINE

MTL-07 RIDGELINE

MTL-07 RIDGELINE

MTL-07 RIDGELINE

915 X 915 ROOFACCESS HATCH WITHLADDER BELOW






MTL-02INTERLOCKINGFLAT-LOCK ZINCTILES, TYP.




MTL-07 S.S. ROOFEDGE AND GUTTER







1M WIDECONTINUOUSSERVICE WALK, TYP

LVR-07 EXTERIOREXHAUST LOUVER

GL-40 SKYLIGHTGLAZING ABOVESLOPED MTL-01

LVR-07 EXTERIOREXHAUST LOUVER

BIPV-01 BIPVGLASS-AT ROOFABOVE SOLID ROOF



PV-01 PV ARRAY -STANDARD OPAQUEON ROOF MOUNTEDPEDESTALS

GL-33 BIPV GLASSSKYLIGHT ABOVESLOPED MTL-01PAINTED STEELWAFFLE STRUCTURE

MTL-06 STANDINGSEAM METAL PANELROOF

GL-33 BIPV GLASSSKYLIGHT

GL-37 GLASS BRIDGECANOPY

GL-32 BIPV GLASSBRIDGE CANOPY

GL-37 GLASS BRIDGECANOPY

GL-32 BIPV GLASSBRIDGE CANOPY

WP-C3.2

WP-C3.1

WP-C3.4

WP-C3.3

63227

8000

63227

6000

7292

2

6000

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP


ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP

ROOF DRAIN, TYP


ROOF DRAIN, TYPROOF DRAIN, TYP

SLOPE D

N 58%

53% D

N

SLOPE DN 58%

53% DN

68% D

N

86% D

N

SLO

PE D

N 66

%

74%

DN

SLO

PE D

N 40

%

40%

DN

SLOPE DN 58%

53% DN

SLOPE DN 58%

53% DN

25% DN

131% DN

3% D

N

3% DN

3% DN

3% DN

35144 HP

CX AE-5104

1A SIM.

CX AE-5101

1A SIM.

CX AE-5103

1A SIM.

CX AE-5102

1A SIM.

CX AE-5100

1A SIM.

CX AE-5107

1A SIM.

C1.4 AE-5032

1A SIM.

C1.4 AE-5030

2A SIM.

C1.4 AE-5031

2A SIM.

28323 HP

21452 LP

24959 LP

3% D

N

3% DN

3% DN

3% DN

3% DN

3% DN

3% D

N

3% DN

3% DN

SLOPE D

N 58%

43% D

N

SLOPE DN 58%

43% DN

SLOPE DN 58%

43% DN

CX AE-5109

1A

MECCA

PROJECTNORTHTRUE

NORTH

EXPO-2017 - FUTURE ENERGYREPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN, ASTANA

ОПИСАНИЕДАТА№ П.П. ПРОВЕРИЛ

ЭКСПО-2017 - ЭНЕРГИЯ БУДУЩЕГОРЕСПУБЛИКА КАЗАХСТАН, АСТАНА

PROJECT AUTHOR / АВТОР ПРОЕКТА CLIENT / ЗАКАЗЧИКIT ENGINEERING SA

Expo 2017 Construction SiteAstana / Kazakhstan

KAZAKHSTAN 9 Beibitshilik street,Saryarka district

EXPO 2017 - JSCREPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN, ASTANA

ЭКСПО 2017 - ОАОРЕСПУБЛИКА КАЗАХСТАН, АСТАНА

DESIGN PHASE IN COOPERATION WITH / ЭТАП ПРОЕКТИРОВАНИЯ В СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВЕ СARCHITECTS / АРХИТЕКТОРЫ STR. PROJECTS / КОНСТРУКТИВНАЯ ЧАСТЬ ПРОЕКТА MEP PROJECTS / ПРОЕКТ. ИНЖЕНЕРНЫХ СИСТЕМ

ADRIAN SMITH + GORDON GILLArchitecture111 West Monroe Street Suite 2300Chicago Il 60603Tel: 312 920 1888Fax: 312 920 1775

WERNER SOBEK STUTTGART GMBHAlbstraße 14 70597 Stuttgart / GermanyTel: +49.711.76750-0Fax: +49.711.76750-44

POSITIVE ENERGY PRACTICE115 South LaSalle StreetSuite 2800 Chicago, IL 60603Tel: 312.374.9200Fax: 312.269.5867

INFRASTR. PROJECTS / ПРОЕКТ. ИНФРАСТРУКТУРА LANDSCAPE PROJECTS / ПРОЕКТ. ЛАНДШАФТА INTERIOR PROJECTS / ДИЗАЙН ИНТЕРЬЕРА

CONSULTANT / КОНСУЛЬТАНТOTHER COOPERATIONS / ДРУГИЕ ПАРТНЕРЫOTHER COOPERATIONS / ДРУГИЕ ПАРТНЕРЫ

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС

(1270x841)NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONНЕ ДЛЯ СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВА

DRAWING REFERENCE / ЧЕРТЕЖЕЙ ДЛЯ СПРАВОК

PROJECT SITEУЧАСТОК

DISCIPLINEДИСЦИПЛИНЫ

STAGEЭТАП

PARCELУЧАСТОК

LEVELУРОВЕНЬ

SHEET NO.ЛИСТ №.

REV.РЕВ.

DWG NO.ЧЕРТЕЖ №.

ИЗМ КОЛ.УЧ. ЛИСТ №ДОК.ПОДПИСЬ ДАТА

ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ

РАЗРАБОТАЛ

МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ СПЕЦИАЛИЗИРОВАННАЯ ВЫСТАВКА ЭКСПО-2017

СТАДИЯ ЛИСТ ЛИСТОВ

IT ENGINEERING SA9 Beibitshilik streetSaryarka district Astana

АСТ-ЭКС

NOTES/ПРИМЕЧАНИЯ :

APFILE PATH:

IN-PROGRESS ISSUENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

2015.01.30

АСТАНА ЭКСПО НАЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ КОМПАНИЯ

050000, Республика КазахстанАлматы, пр. Абылай хана, 81Tel: +7 727 2588570, +7 727 2588575Fax: +7 727 2588571

А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН

Rev. No. DATE DESCRIPTION CHECKED BY

П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

и дата

Взам

. инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П

PLAN NOTES (ABOVE GRADE - EXPO)

1. FINAL COORDINATION OF PROJECT DESIGN ELEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF IT ENGINEERS, 1. FINALCOORDINATION OF PROJECT DESIGN ELEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF IT ENGINEERS, INCLUDINGINFORMATION PROVIDED BY STRUCTURAL, MEP-FP, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS.a. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL BASE BUILDING STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS AND

CONDITIONS.b. REFER TO MEP-FP DRAWINGS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO BUILDING SYSTEMS.c. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FINAL GRADING, SITE ELEVATIONS & DRAINAGE DETAILS WITHIN THE

PUBLIC REALM.d. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR PAVING PATTERNS, PLANTING ZONES, TREE PLACEMENT AND

OTHER PUBLIC REALM DESIGN ELEMENTS.e. ITE TO COORDINATE ALL REVISIONS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE FIELD CONDITIONS.

2. REFER TO PROJECT MANUAL (SPECIFICATIONS) FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.MANUAL ALSO INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING PROJECT SCHEDULES:a. DOOR SCHEDULES AND OVERHEAD DOOR SCHEDULEb. ROOM FNISH SCHEDULEc. SCHEDULED TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES

3. REFER TO G-SERIES DRAWINGS FOR MASTER PLAN GUIDELINES, INCLUDING PARCEL IDENTIFICATION,PARCEL CONTROLS AND PUBLIC REALM GUIDELINES.

4. REFER TO G-0040 FOR MATERIAL LIST; REFER TO G-0050 FOR ABBREVIATIONS; REFER TO G-0060 FORGENERAL NOTES.

5. REFER TO GS-SERIES DRAWINGS FOR 1:2000 AND 1:1000 SITE PLANS AND SECTIONS. SEE GS-0800 SERIESFOR SITE WIDE GEOMETRY AND WORK POINTS. SEE GS-SERIES ALSO FOR ENLARGED PLANS REALTED TOPUBLIC REALM PLANS.

6. REFER TO L-PARCEL DRAWINGS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING KIOSKS & VISITORENTRANCES.

7.REFER TO 1200 SERIES PLANS (1:200 SCALE PLANS) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, INCLUDING:ROOM NAMES, PARTITION TYPES, DIMENSIONS, STAIR TAGS, DOOR TAGS, AND ELEVATOR TAGS.

8. REFER TO X AE-7000 SERIES FOR PARTITION TYPES AND DETAILS.

9. REFER TO AE-6000 SERIES DRAWING FOR BUILDING INTERIOR DESIGN INFORMATION.

10. +0.0 PROJECT DATUM = (+348.0 LOCAL COORDINATES)*

11. ALL ABOVE GRADE PLANS ARE CUT AT 1200mm A.F.F.

12. ALL DIMENSIONS PROVIDED TO CURVED GEOMETRY ARE ARC LENGTHS TAKEN AT THE FACE OF WALL

Author

Checker

Approver

PARCEL C3 PLAN- ROOF

C3 AE-1003

0 1.5 3 7.5 15 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 300C3 AE-1003

1APARCEL C3 - ROOF PLAN

REFER TO:

- GS-0800 SERIES FOR ROOF GEOMETRY PLANS AND DIMENSIONS

- SHEET C3.5-C3.6 AE-1204 FOR THEMATIC PAVILION ROOF PLAN

1 2014.08.22 ISSUED FOR SCHEMATIC DESIGN2 2014.09.26 ISSUED FOR SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVISED3 2014.10.10 ISSUED FOR SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVISED4 2014.10.24 ISSUED FOR DD IN-PROGRESS5 2014.11.21 ISSUED FOR DD IN-PROGRESS6 2014.12.19 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT7 2015.01.30 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVISED

3a

2a

1a

b

4a

5a

6a

7a

8a

9a

d

d

c

12a

13a

14a

15a

16a

e

e

WP 1

WP 2

WP 3

WP 4

WP 5

WP 6

WP 7

WP 8

R 60000

R 60000

WP C4

WP C3

WP C1

WP C5

WP C2

WP C6

CENTER OF EXPO SITE

AXIS

C4.

6

PRO

JEC

T N

OR

TH

AXIS

C4.

6

146.

25°

LIN

E 0

LINE 1

LIN

E 0

LINE 1

WP C4.5

4500.0

4500.0

1412

28.1

DIST

. FRO

M C

ENTE

R AL

ONG A

XIS

C4.5

2055

42.8

DIS

T. F

RO

M C

ENTE

R A

LON

G P

RO

JEC

T N

OR

TH/S

OU

TH D

IREC

TIO

N

137348.9

DIST. FROM CENTER ALONG PROJECT EAST/WEST DIRECTION

R 1205

00

WP 9WP 10

WP 11

WP 12

WP S1

WP S2

WP S3

WP S4

WP S5

WP S6

WP S7

WP S8

WP SC1

WP SC2

WP SC4

WP SC3

WP SC5

WP SC6

1267.4 956.3

1267.4 956.3

956.32270.0

956.32270.0

2307

.617

33.9

2307

.6

1733

.9

2307

.6

1733

.9

2307

.617

33.9

R 11750

R 11

750

3998.7 2745

.6

2745

.7

3998.7

R 2050

R 2050

R 2050

R 2050

5001.314450.0

R 39000

R 39000

R 10

3805

2325 9625

4345

5931

0

3595

1079

0

2795

1079

0

13665

6475

7060

2365

1024

0

1297

0

8570

1159

5

2405

7100

6395

17455

1024

0

1302

5

8610

1150

0

WP S1

EQ

EQEQ

EQEQEQEQEQ

EQ

EQ

64.10°

10b9b8b7b

6b5b

4b

3b

2b

1b

90.37°

132.31° 10.62°

78.41°

78.41°

10.68°

64.5°

64.5°

J

1400

1400

WP S2

11b

12b

13b

14b

15b

16b

17b

18b

19b

20b

EQ

EQEQ

EQEQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

64.1°

51724 7660 3119

4494

7086

3877

MECCA

PROJECTNORTHTRUE

NORTH















DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.



ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ





АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:


2015.01.30



А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

и дата

Взам

. инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П

PLAN NOTES (GEOMETRY PLANS)

EXPO PHASE:1. SITE ELEVATIONSa. +0.0 PROJECT DATUM = +348.0 (LOCAL COORDINATES)*b. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FINAL GRADING, SITE ELEVATIONS & DRAINAGE DETAILS WITHIN

THE PUBLIC REALM

*TAKEN AS AN AVERAGE VALUE OF SOIL PROFILES AT THE EXPO SITE, FROM KARGANDAGIIZ & K 2013GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, 'EXPO 2017', VOLUME 1

2. SITE COORDINATES (PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY)a. CENTER OF EXPO SITE (N -8946.570, E -446.470) LOCATED PER DIRECTION FROM ITE ENGINEERING

ON 19 MAY, 2014, PER TRANSMITTED FILE ЭКСПО2017_предварительная посадка.dwg. ASTANALOCAL COORDINATE GRID BASED ON TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY, TONOC-EXPO-2017.dwg, PROVIDEDTO AS+GG ON 2013.11.04 BY EXPO NATIONAL COMPANY

Author

Checker

Approver

THEMATIC PAVILION C1.4 - EXTERIOR WALL - ROOF GEOMETRYPLAN

C4.5-C4.6 AE-5002

0 1 2 5 10 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 200C4.5-C4.6 AE-5002

1AEXTERIOR WALL - ROOF GEOMETRY PLAN

1 2014.12.19 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT2 2015.01.30 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVISED



The overall project was broken down into 42 individual Revit models developed by eight teams. Each building was composed of the base building model and the exterior wall model. Each model documents the complex geometric building forms, interior architectural elements, structural framework and MEP systems. This significantly enhanced communication between each design team and the team of international consultants.

C-3 Ext Wall

C-3 Roof

C Ext Wall

C-3 Core

Interior

C-3 MEPFP

C-3 International Pavilion

C-3 ThematicPavilion

MasterplanL-2 Kiosks

C-3 Structure

C-3 International and Thematic Pavilions Revit model and its components C-3 International and Thematic Pavilion Roof Plan Sheet

Thematic Pavilion Roof Geometry Plan Sheet

A-1 Basement

MOLD TYPE M

67.0

40.0

82.0

170.0

1.02.02.03.04.04.05.06.010.028.0

1.01.01.02.03.04.04.05.08.011.0

1.01.01.02.02.03.05.05.012.050.0

1.01.01.01.01.02.02.02.02.03.03.03.04.012.0132.0

MOLD TYPE M

MOLD TYPE L

MOLD TYPE K

123.0

86.0

2002.0

142.0

48.0

38.0

418.0

171.0

143.0

389.0 6.08.09.09.010.012.018.027.032.070.078.0110.0

1.01.05.010.012.014.026.031.043.0

2.02.04.011.016.021.025.044.046.0

1.01.02.02.03.04.04.09.010.011.011.012.030.040.042.061.0175.0

2.02.03.03.05.06.08.09.0

3.03.04.04.010.012.012.0

2.02.04.06.011.012.013.014.018.026.034.0

1.024.053.058.01866.0

4.011.015.018.019.019.0

2.04.05.05.05.06.06.06.07.08.08.09.012.012.014.014.0

MOLD TYPE A

MOLD TYPE B

MOLD TYPE C

MOLD TYPE D

MOLD TYPE E

MOLD TYPE F

MOLD TYPE G

MOLD TYPE H

MOLD TYPE I

MOLD TYPE J

1.55

1.54

1.55

1.55

1.25

0.11

0.14

0.18

0.09

0.16

0.22

0.28

0.07

0.09

0.11

0.11

0.14

0.16

0.16

0.16

0.18

1.69

0.26

1.69

1.69

0.33

1.69

0.40

0.47

1.69

0.54

1.69

1.69

0.62

0.69

1.69

0.76

1.69

0.18

0.83

1.69

0.07

1.13

0.07

1.16

0.07

1.49

0.03

1.41

0.03

1.13

0.08

1.20

0.07

1.18

0.03

1.16

0.07

1.16

0.07

1.49

0.03

1.20

0.07

1.18

0.07

1.20

0.07

1.50

0.07

1.20

0.12

1.18

0.12

1.49

0.12

1.16

0.12

1.49

0.12

1.20

0.12

1.16

0.12

1.18

0.12

1.20

0.12

1.50

0.12

1.20

0.16

1.16

0.16

1.20

0.16

1.48

0.16

1.16

0.16

1.13

0.16

1.49

0.16

1.18

0.16

1.20

0.16

1.50

0.16

1.20

0.21

1.16

0.21

1.50

0.21

1.49

0.21

1.48

0.21

1.20

0.21

1.20

0.21

1.18

0.21

1.45

0.21

1.48

0.21

1.18

0.21

1.20

0.70

0.75

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.75

0.75

0.70

0.75

0.70

0.70

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.50

0.55

0.50

0.55

0.50

0.50

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.50

0.55

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.30

0.35

0.35

0.35

0.30

0.30

0.35

0.35

0.35

0.30

0.30

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.15

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.15

0.15

1.211.231.451.481.231.231.25

1.251.251.251.251.25

1.411.231.49

1.451.481.251.23

1.251.25

1.231.45

1.21

1.481.251.491.231.251.25

1.501.171.171.211.211.23

1.231.491.231.251.23

1.251.501.251.251.251.25

1.17

1.21

1.231.211.25

1.231.251.25

1.21

1.231.211.25

1.231.251.25

1.23

1.211.251.23

1.231.25

1.231.251.251.25

1.231.251.501.251.25

1.21

1.231.23

1.251.251.25

1.17

1.21

1.231.211.251.23

1.171.25

1.211.25

1.211.25

1.231.251.231.25

BODY PANELSMOLD TYPES CUT PANEL TYPES

MOLD OUTLINE

FINAL PANELOUTLINE

FLATZONE

BUBBLE

EDGE PANELSMOLD TYPES CUT PANEL TYPES

B2.3 AE-6605

1C

MOLD

EXTENTS OF MOLD

START OF 3D RELIEF

BUBBLE ZONE

FLAT ZONEALLOWS FORMUTLIPLE PANELSSIZES TO BE CUTFROM ONE MOLD

PANEL

FINISHED PANEL SIZE

CUT FROM FLAT ZONE

EXTENTS OF MOLD1685

800

1300

680














DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.

DWG NO.ЧЕРТЕЖ№.


ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ


МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯСПЕЦИАЛИЗИРОВАННАЯ ВЫСТАВКА ЭКСПО-2017



АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION



А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

идата

Взам

.инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П

Via Colleoni, 54/5636016 Thiene - Italytel. 0445/375300fax 0445/375375

BUILDING ELEVATION/SECTION NOTES

1. FINAL COORDINATION OF PROJECT DESIGN ELEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF IT ENGINEERS, INCLUDINGINFORMATION PROVIDED BY STRUCTURAL, MEP-FP, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS.a. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL BASE BUILDING STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS AND

CONDITIONS.b. REFER TO MEP-FP DRAWINGS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO BUILDING SYSTEMS.

2. REFER TO PROJECT MANUAL (SPECIFICATIONS) FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.

3. REFER TO G-0040 FOR MATERIAL LIST; REFER TO G-0050 FOR ABBREVIATIONS; REFER TO G-0055 FORTYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHT / ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; REFER TO G-0060 FOR GENERAL NOTES ANDEXTERIOR WALL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.

4. REFER TO GS-0800 FOR PARCEL B GEOMETRY. GS-0801 FOR PARCEL C GEOMETRY PLAN.

5. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS FOR ELEVATION MARKERS AND LOCATION OF SECTION CUTS.


7. POST-EXPO PHASE INFORMATION SHOWN IN BOLD. EXISTING EXPO-PHASE CONSTRUCTION TYPICALLYSHOWN AS GREY-TONE.

8. ALL DIMENSIONS PROVIDED TO CURVED GEOMETRY ARE ARC LENGTHS TAKEN AT THE EXTERIOR FACE OFWALLa. SOME DIMENSIONS ARE OBLIQUE TO SECTION CUT AND ARE ODD & VARY.

Author

Checker

Approver

ENERGY HALL - FEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM

B2.3 AE-6605

Sheet:B2.3 AE-66055EFEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM - SOUTH

Sheet:B2.3 AE-66051EFEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM - NORTH


1 : 100B2.3 AE-6605

3FEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM

1 2015.02.27 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVISED

NOTE:

- PANEL SIZES PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY; REFER TO 3D MODEL FOR EXACT GEOMETRY

- PANEL SIZE/ MOLD OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY TO BE CONFIRM WITH MANUFACTURER

- TOTAL PANEL COUNT AS OPTIMIZED : 3939 PANELS WITH 862 DOUBLE SIDED

0 1.5 3 7.5 15 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 30B2.3 AE-6605

1CFEATURE WALL PANEL/ MOLD SIZE OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY

NOTE:


- PANEL SIZE/ MOLD OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY TO BE CONFIRMED WITH MANUFACTURER

MOLD TYPE M

67.0

40.0

82.0

170.0

1.02.02.03.04.04.05.06.010.028.0

1.01.01.02.03.04.04.05.08.011.0

1.01.01.02.02.03.05.05.012.050.0

1.01.01.01.01.02.02.02.02.03.03.03.04.012.0132.0

MOLD TYPE M

MOLD TYPE L

MOLD TYPE K

123.0

86.0

2002.0

142.0

48.0

38.0

418.0

171.0

143.0

389.0 6.08.09.09.010.012.018.027.032.070.078.0110.0

1.01.05.010.012.014.026.031.043.0

2.02.04.011.016.021.025.044.046.0

1.01.02.02.03.04.04.09.010.011.011.012.030.040.042.061.0175.0

2.02.03.03.05.06.08.09.0

3.03.04.04.010.012.012.0

2.02.04.06.011.012.013.014.018.026.034.0

1.024.053.058.01866.0

4.011.015.018.019.019.0

2.04.05.05.05.06.06.06.07.08.08.09.012.012.014.014.0

MOLD TYPE A

MOLD TYPE B

MOLD TYPE C

MOLD TYPE D

MOLD TYPE E

MOLD TYPE F

MOLD TYPE G

MOLD TYPE H

MOLD TYPE I

MOLD TYPE J

1.55

1.54

1.55

1.55

1.25

0.11

0.14

0.18

0.09

0.16

0.22

0.28

0.07

0.09

0.11

0.11

0.14

0.16

0.16

0.16

0.18

1.69

0.26

1.69

1.69

0.33

1.69

0.40

0.47

1.69

0.54

1.69

1.69

0.62

0.69

1.69

0.76

1.69

0.18

0.83

1.69

0.07

1.13

0.07

1.16

0.07

1.49

0.03

1.41

0.03

1.13

0.08

1.20

0.07

1.18

0.03

1.16

0.07

1.16

0.07

1.49

0.03

1.20

0.07

1.18

0.07

1.20

0.07

1.50

0.07

1.20

0.12

1.18

0.12

1.49

0.12

1.16

0.12

1.49

0.12

1.20

0.12

1.16

0.12

1.18

0.12

1.20

0.12

1.50

0.12

1.20

0.16

1.16

0.16

1.20

0.16

1.48

0.16

1.16

0.16

1.13

0.16

1.49

0.16

1.18

0.16

1.20

0.16

1.50

0.16

1.20

0.21

1.16

0.21

1.50

0.21

1.49

0.21

1.48

0.21

1.20

0.21

1.20

0.21

1.18

0.21

1.45

0.21

1.48

0.21

1.18

0.21

1.20

0.70

0.75

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.75

0.75

0.70

0.75

0.70

0.70

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.60

0.50

0.55

0.50

0.55

0.50

0.50

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.50

0.55

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.30

0.35

0.35

0.35

0.30

0.30

0.35

0.35

0.35

0.30

0.30

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.15

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.15

0.15

1.211.231.451.481.231.231.25

1.251.251.251.251.25

1.411.231.49

1.451.481.251.23

1.251.25

1.231.45

1.21

1.481.251.491.231.251.25

1.501.171.171.211.211.23

1.231.491.231.251.23

1.251.501.251.251.251.25

1.17

1.21

1.231.211.25

1.231.251.25

1.21

1.231.211.25

1.231.251.25

1.23

1.211.251.23

1.231.25

1.231.251.251.25

1.231.251.501.251.25

1.21

1.231.23

1.251.251.25

1.17

1.21

1.231.211.251.23

1.171.25

1.211.25

1.211.25

1.231.251.231.25

BODY PANELSMOLD TYPES CUT PANEL TYPES

MOLD OUTLINE

FINAL PANELOUTLINE

FLATZONE

BUBBLE

EDGE PANELSMOLD TYPES CUT PANEL TYPES

B2.3 AE-6605

1C

MOLD

EXTENTS OF MOLD

START OF 3D RELIEF

BUBBLE ZONE

FLAT ZONEALLOWS FORMUTLIPLE PANELSSIZES TO BE CUTFROM ONE MOLD

PANEL

FINISHED PANEL SIZE

CUT FROM FLAT ZONE

EXTENTS OF MOLD1685

800

1300

680














DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.



ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ





АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:




А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

идата

Взам

.инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П


BUILDING ELEVATION/SECTION NOTES

1. FINAL COORDINATION OF PROJECT DESIGN ELEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF IT ENGINEERS, INCLUDINGINFORMATION PROVIDED BY STRUCTURAL, MEP-FP, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS.a. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL BASE BUILDING STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS AND

CONDITIONS.b. REFER TO MEP-FP DRAWINGS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO BUILDING SYSTEMS.

2. REFER TO PROJECT MANUAL (SPECIFICATIONS) FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.

3. REFER TO G-0040 FOR MATERIAL LIST; REFER TO G-0050 FOR ABBREVIATIONS; REFER TO G-0055 FORTYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHT / ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; REFER TO G-0060 FOR GENERAL NOTES ANDEXTERIOR WALL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.

4. REFER TO GS-0800 FOR PARCEL B GEOMETRY. GS-0801 FOR PARCEL C GEOMETRY PLAN.

5. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS FOR ELEVATION MARKERS AND LOCATION OF SECTION CUTS.


7. POST-EXPO PHASE INFORMATION SHOWN IN BOLD. EXISTING EXPO-PHASE CONSTRUCTION TYPICALLYSHOWN AS GREY-TONE.

8. ALL DIMENSIONS PROVIDED TO CURVED GEOMETRY ARE ARC LENGTHS TAKEN AT THE EXTERIOR FACE OFWALLa. SOME DIMENSIONS ARE OBLIQUE TO SECTION CUT AND ARE ODD & VARY.

Author

Checker

Approver

ENERGY HALL - FEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM

B2.3 AE-6605

Sheet:B2.3 AE-66055EFEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM - SOUTH

Sheet:B2.3 AE-66051EFEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM - NORTH


1 : 100B2.3 AE-6605

3FEATURE WALL PANEL TYPES DIAGRAM

1 2015.02.27 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVISED

NOTE:


- PANEL SIZE/ MOLD OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY TO BE CONFIRM WITH MANUFACTURER

- TOTAL PANEL COUNT AS OPTIMIZED : 3939 PANELS WITH 862 DOUBLE SIDED

0 1.5 3 7.5 15 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 30B2.3 AE-6605

1CFEATURE WALL PANEL/ MOLD SIZE OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY

NOTE:


- PANEL SIZE/ MOLD OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY TO BE CONFIRMED WITH MANUFACTURER



Each building has unique challenges in regards to documentation. The design teams created workflows and documentation procedures to illustrate and communicate the design intent through drawings along with 3D models for critical architectural components. Embedded in the documents of these components are the processes and strategies for installation along with the optimization of the component fabrication.


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Process - Coordination

The project team used BIM to explore multiple iterations of a design in virtual space prior to documentation. The iterations were analyzed for design expression, energy impact, and structural integrity, with all team members participating in a coordinated effort. This was particularly important for the sphere, a complex design that required close collaboration with the structural consultant located in Germany.

The Sphere structure was modeled as an idealized design expression- the structural team analyzed and engineered the structural forces of the complex grid shell and proposed further optimizations. The refined members were evaluated in the architectural model which was further coordinated and refined. Finally this process was repeated in a feedback loop that pushed the design of the various consultants to be a fully integrated solution that expresses those systems.

Structural Analysis ModelSite Construction Photographs - January 2016 Structural Analysis Model Design Model



Design ModelConstruction November 2015

One major design element that required close collaboration with the structural team was the configuration of the slab edges. The program area within the sphere is arranged around two atrium spaces and span column-free from the core to the perimeter sphere structure. The continuity of structural elements as well as the allowable slab cantilever tightened the design of the freeform slab edges.



The coordinated BIM models were shared with contractors and fabricators to convey design intent and spatial relationships during construction. Using the design models as a starting point, the fabricators prepared shop drawings with a complete 3D fabrication model which, in-turn, was used by the design team for clash detection and design verification. This constant validation loop required the design model to be responsive to input from the fabricators and structural team.


Congress Hall Study Model

Congress Hall Rendering

Over the course of the Astana Expo City project, design complexity required the teams to find workflows that allowed integration of software such as Rhinoceros, to maintain the high level of design and fast-pace of the project. Interoperability proved to be an invaluable tool allowing teams to quickly move between design and documentation. Using interoperability the teams were able to maintain the design intent with extreme accuracy while generating fully native Revit geometry. These native Revit models were then able to utilize the full suite of robust tools and documentation benefits within Revit. The benefits of interoperability proved essential as they allowed teams to blend an evolving and iterative design with the documentation.

ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Design - Interoperability



Rhino Model Rhino Model with split and panelized surfaces Congress Center Construction 2016

Using a series of scripts in Grasshopper, a plug-in for Rhinoceros, the team generated the design surface geometry of Congress Center. Information gathered in these scripts was used to split surfaces based on area, a process known as “panelization”. These panels were then optimized and flattened within an acceptable range of deviation. Once the panelization in Grasshopper was complete, each of the panel vertices could then be organized and sent to Revit using Hummingbird.

In Revit, Adaptive Components were created to retrieve this information and stretch to these points to form a perfectly accurate, fully parametric and native Revit curtain panel. This methodology and continuous feedback loop was applied to every building within the overall Astana Expo 2017 project.

Grasshopper Scripts Adaptive Component

T/FF LEVEL 3369100.0



VA

RIE

S

1020

VA

RIE

S

3440

VA

RIE

S

1540

VA

RIE

S

1660

VA

RIE

S

790

VA

RIE

S

360

VA

RIE

S

1550

VA

RIE

S

840

VA

RIE

S

1850

VA

RIE

S

880

VA

RIE

S

890

VA

RIE

S

2100

VA

RIE

S

5900

N1.3 AE-5700

4A

N1.3 AE-5700

4C

N1.3 AE-5700

7F

MTL-03B COMPOSITEHONEYCOMB ZINCPANEL



GL-76 TRIPLEGLAZED IGU







GL-32A LAMINATEDGLASS PANEL W/CERAMIC FRITPATTERN TO MATCHMONOCRYSTALLINELITES

GL-32 LAMINATEDGLASS PANEL W/MONOCRYSTALLINEPV CELLS

MTL-05 STAINLESSSTEEL GUTTER


CAVITY SPACE

CAVITY SPACE

CAVITY SPACE

CAVITY SPACE

CAVITY SPACE

INTERIOR CLADDING

VA

RIE

S

8807

6000

8000

VA

RIE

S

2280

7

CONT. LED LIGHTFIXTURE (TYP.)




VA

RIE

S

780

VA

RIE

S

6060

VA

RIE

S

940

VA

RIE

S

1050

VA

RIE

S

830

VA

RIE

S

1210

VA

RIE

S

770

VA

RIE

S

1380

VA

RIE

S

770

VA

RIE

S

2840

VA

RIE

S

5150

N1.3 AE-5700

4A

N1.3 AE-5700

4C











GL-32 LAMINATEDGLASS PANEL W/MONOCRYSTALLINEPV CELLS





CAVITY SPACE

INTERIOR CLADDING

CAVITY SPACE

N1.3 AE-5700

7FSIM

VA

RIE

S

7776

6000

8000

VA

RIE

S

2177

6














DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.



ГАП

ГЛ.КОНСТР.





АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:



А. ТЕРДЖАН

ДЖАЗЫБАЕВ

К. ФИШЕКЧИ


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

и дата

Взам

. инв

. N

A

8 1234567

B

C

D

E

F

G



КОНГРЕСС ЦЕНТР 000 000

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0

П

Author

Checker

Approver

CONGRESS CENTER - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM -TYPE A1

N1.3 AE-5101

0 0.5 1 2.5 5 Scale:Sheet: N1.3 AE-5101

6BWALL TYPE A1 AXON VIEW0 0.5 1 2.5 5 Scale:

Sheet: 1 : 50

N1.3 AE-51011BWALL TYPE A1 PARTIAL SECTION 1

0 0.5 1 2.5 5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50N1.3 AE-5101

4BWALL TYPE A1 PARTIAL SECTION 2

1 2015.02.27 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT2 2015.03.27 ISSUED FOR REVISED CLIENT COMMENTS



Congress Hall Construction Photograph

The use of interoperability tools like Grasshopper and Dynamo (a plug-in for Revit) was essential when developing the complex interior spaces and exterior walls of the project models. Over the course of the project three major categories were used to judge the effectiveness of our Interoperability processes: optimization of the workflow, the accuracy of the translated geometry, and file size to help with the usability of the design model by many team members simultaneously.

Congress Hall Wall Section Drawings


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Design - Optimization of Form

Countless designs were modeled and tested to find an appropriate form that responded to the programmatic requirements but that also optimized the amount of energy generation that could occur. For the design of the sphere these iterations focused on the wind energy that could be harvested from the surface of the sphere. The design team worked closely with wind engineers to design and test multiple overall building forms and eventually the various shape of an inlet on the surface of the building.

Rhino Design Model



Kazakhstan Pavilion Construction Photograph Kazakhstan Pavilion Rendering

The integration of this particular design element is an example of where design, coordination, interoperability and documentation come together. The balance of the design and engineering systems with the analysis, measuring, and performance tracking, was critical to meeting the overall project goals. Many variables needed to be negotiated and integrated in order to provide holistic design solutions across the Astana Expo City 2017 project.

6DB1 AE-5202

1DB1 AE-5202

SST-102 STAINLESSSTEEL FITTING

GL-07 DOUBLE BIPVGLAZING

LVR-02 LOUVERS W/INSUL. BLANK-OFFPANEL WHERENECESSARY

GL-08 DOUBLEVISION GLAZING

SPHERE PRIMARYSTRUCTURE

ACCESS PANEL W/INSUL. BLANK-OFFPANEL

REFER TO PEP DRAWINGS FOR AIR RATES

MTL-05 METALPANEL

B1 T. SPHERE93860

B1 AE-5821

1A





MTL-05 METALPANEL



CL

REFER TO PEP DRAWINGS FOR AIR RATES

B1 LEVEL 8 MEZ80720

ACCESS PANELSMOKE EXHAUST MEP LOUVERS SMOKE EXHAUST

B1 T. SPHERE93860





6500MM DIAMETERWIND TURBINE


0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5202

1ATYPE B-B3 LOUVER PLAN

0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5202

1DTYPE B-B3 LOUVER ELEVATION0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:

Sheet: 1 : 50

B1 AE-52026DTYPE B-B3 LOUVER SECTION

Sheet:Ref:

B1 AE-52026ATYPE B-B3 PARTIAL 3D















DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.



ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ





АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:


2015.01.30



А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

идата

Взам

.инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П

KF

AV

AV

B1

KA PAVILION EXTERIOR WALL - TYPE B - B3

B1 AE-5202

1 2014.09.26 ISSUED FOR DD IN-PROGRESS2 2014.10.24 ISSUED FOR DD IN-PROGRESS3 2014.11.21 ISSUED FOR DD IN-PROGRESS4 2014.12.19 ISSUED FOR DD IN-PROGRESS5 2015.01.30 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

R= 2492

R=

1225

R= 4533

R= 4010

R= 6130



SST-102 STAINLESSSTEEL CAP


GL-10

5EB1 AE-5201A

B1 AE-5820A

1A

REMOVABLEACCESSABLE PANEL

B1 T. SPHERE93860

5EB1 AE-5201A

15805

3500 3500 905

5275

217524402385905

6575

1805

8810

R= 3500

R=4746



GL-10



MTL-05 METALPANEL

CL


B1 T. SPHERE93860

7480

1760

3500905455 3045 905

78958810

1810

11410 11410

22820


SST-102 STAINLESSSTEEL TWO-WAYMULLIONS




GL-10



AIRCRAFT WARNINGBEACON


CL

REQ. FREE VENT AREA: 2.9 SQMPROVIDED LOUVER AREA: 9.2 SQM

B1 AE-5820A

4D

MTL-05 METALPANEL

R=52

90



GL-10

















DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.



ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ





АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:


2015.01.30



А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

идата

Взам

.инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П

KF

AV

AV

B1

KA PAVILION EXTERIOR WALL - TYPE B - B2 - ALTERNATE

B1 AE-5201A

0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A

1ATYPE B-B2 TURBINE DIVIDER PLAN

0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A

1ETYPE B-B2 TURBINE ELEVATION0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:

Sheet: 1 : 50

B1 AE-5201A5ETYPE B-B2 TURBINE DIVIDER SECTION

0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A

1CTYPE B-B2 TURBINE DIVIDER RC PLAN

0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet: B1 AE-5201A

5ATYPE B-B2 PARTIAL 3D

1 2014.12.19 ISSUED FOR DD IN-PROGRESS2 2015.01.30 ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

R= 2492

R=

1225

R= 4533

R= 4010

R= 6130





GL-10

5EB1 AE-5201A

B1 AE-5820A

1A


B1 T. SPHERE93860

5EB1 AE-5201A

15805

3500 3500 905

5275

217524402385905

6575

1805

8810

R= 3500

R=4746



GL-10



MTL-05 METALPANEL

CL


B1 T. SPHERE93860

7480

1760

3500905455 3045 905

78958810

1810

11410 11410

22820






GL-10





CL


B1 AE-5820A

4D

MTL-05 METALPANEL

R=52

90



GL-10

















DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.



ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ





АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:


2015.01.30



А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

идата

Взам

.инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П

KF

AV

AV

B1


B1 AE-5201A

0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A


0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A


Sheet: 1 : 50


0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A


0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet: B1 AE-5201A



R= 2492

R=

1225

R= 4533

R= 4010

R= 6130





GL-10

5EB1 AE-5201A

B1 AE-5820A

1A


B1 T. SPHERE93860

5EB1 AE-5201A

15805

3500 3500 905

5275

217524402385905

6575

1805

8810

R= 3500

R=4746



GL-10



MTL-05 METALPANEL

CL


B1 T. SPHERE93860

7480

1760

3500905455 3045 905

78958810

1810

11410 11410

22820






GL-10





CL


B1 AE-5820A

4D

MTL-05 METALPANEL

R=52

90



GL-10

















DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

APPROVED BY

SIZEФОРМАТ

STATUSСТАТУС





STAGEЭТАП


LEVELУРОВЕНЬ


REV.РЕВ.



ГАП

ПРОВЕРИЛ





АСТ-ЭКС


APFILE PATH:


2015.01.30



А. ТЕРДЖАН

А. ТЕРДЖАН

Ч. АЙДЫН


П

Инв

. N подл.

Подпись

идата

Взам

.инв

. N

9

A

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

B

C

D

E

F

G

DRAWING TITLE

AS+GG SHEET NUMBER

№ 3.06 - 14 - АР

A0+

П

KF

AV

AV

B1


B1 AE-5201A

0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A


0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A


Sheet: 1 : 50


0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet:

1 : 50B1 AE-5201A


0 0.25 0.5 1.25 2.5 Scale:Sheet: B1 AE-5201A





The cable-net surface was modeled through a minimal surface, form finding exercise (using the kangaroo plugin for grasshopper), which was coordinated with the façade and structural consultants for analysis and refinement. This process allowed the design team to alter the end condition of the cable-net and have a reasonable feedback of the resultant geometry in real time so that the size and configurations of the turbines along with the shape of the sphere opening can be tuned / optimized.

Rhino Design Model

Rhino Design Model

Type A55% pv coverAge

293.4 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type B49% pv coverAge

150.6 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type c43% pv coverAge

59.0 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type D36% pv coverAge

60.9 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type e30% pv coverAge

162.7 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type F24% pv coverAge

228.5 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type g18% pv coverAge

107.5 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type H23% pv coverAge

62.9 sqm

pAnel AreA

Type I6% pv coverAge

114.4 sqm

pAnel AreA



After the initial form was chosen, more detailed analysis was conducted using Rhino / Grasshopper to further refine the form and to maximize sun exposure for the solar panels. Many investigations were completed and tested to integrate the BIPV panels while balancing the requirements of other critical building components such as MEP surface area requirements, collision with other architectural elements, maximizing wind swept area for the turbines, and the rationalization the double-curved minimal surface geometry. Using current and customized interoperability tools in Grasshopper and Revit along with custom Revit families, the form was translated between the various software packages without needing to use any heavy and incompatible imported geometry.

Rhino Design Model

Rhino Design ModelRhino Design Model

202.6.2015 Energy Report

building energy

C1.4, C2.4, C3.5, C4.6: Thematic Pavilions

C1.1-1.3, C2.1-2.3, C3.1-3.4, C4.1-4.4:

International Pavilions

J2: Art Center

25% Design Savings

On-SiteRenewable

Energy

19%Energy Efficient Design

Conventional Building Annual Energy Consumption

38% Design Savings

On-SiteRenewable

Energy

29%Energy Efficient Design


Astana Masterplan

Energy Efficient Design


29% Design Savings

On-SiteRenewable

Energy

10%

Energy Efficient Design


22% Design Savings

On-SiteRenewable

Energy

4%


ASTANA EXPO CITY 2017Performance

The master plan was designed to meet the five pillars of a Post-Industrial Revolution, which include shifting to renewable energy, designing and constructing buildings as power plants, decentralized energy storage, implementing smart grids, and usage of non-fossil fuel based transport.

The team also developed a series of Key Performance Indicators that addressed a number of sustainability themes including energy, carbon, water, waste, and biodiversity. They tracked these internally throughout the entire design process, providing progress reports to the client. As a consequence, a significant percentage of the energy consumed by the expo community will be provided from renewable sources, with buildings having been designed as generators of power which will be distributed by a site-wide smart grid.

This project utilized advanced simulation software to inform decisions during the design process. This took place at a number of scales—from testing different orientations and building envelope configurations using advanced CFD Simulation, to studying the elimination of thermal bridges while at the same time bringing external structural elements into the spaces, the design team worked closely with the supply chain to identify and specify appropriate solutions and materials. The mechanical systems were tailored specifically around the building envelope performance, allowing us to offset additional investment in the façade system through minimizing the cost of the mechanical system and consequently the life-cycle costs of the building.

As a result of this approach, the post expo development will be one of the most sustainably built in the world. 100% of the post-expo non-potable water demand will be provided by the on-site water reclamation facility. 28% of the post expo electrical demand will be met from on-site BIPV energy systems. The total post-expo grid energy demand is 47% less than an ASHRAE 90.1 2010 Baseline,

Iterative Analysis Models

Expo Site Radiation Analysis

while the office buildings during post-expo will use 21%-39% less energy than ASHRAE 90.1:2010 Baseline (overall reduction is 38%). We also specified that all insulation (a significant component of the energy performance strategy) was accompanied by third party verified EPDs allowing us to reduce the Global Warming Potential and other environmental impacts of the materials used on the project.

astana expo city 2017 - aia professional

Documents