1

Astro2020ScienceWhitePapersIncreasingtheDiscoverySpaceinAstrophysicsACollationofSixSubmittedWhitePapersIncludedThematicAreas: FormationandEvolutionofCompactObjects

Multi-MessengerAstronomyandAstrophysicsStarsandStellarEvolutionPlanetarySystemsStarandPlanetFormationResolvedStellarPopulationsGalaxyEvolutionCosmologyandFundamentalPhysics

PrincipalAuthor:Name:G.Fabbiano Institution:CenterforAstrophysics|Harvard&Smithsonian(CfA)Email:gfabbiano@cfa.harvard.eduCo-authors:M. Elvis (CfA), A. Accomazzi (CfA), A. Avelino (CfA, Harvard), G. B. Berriman(Caltech/IPAC-NExScI),N.Brickhouse (CfA), S.Bose (CfA),D.Carrera (PennStateUniv.), I. Chilingarian (CfA), F. Civano (CfA), B. Czerny (Center for TheoreticalPhysics,Warsaw; CfA collaborator), R. D’Abrusco (CfA), B. Diemer (Cfa), J. Drake(CfA), R. Emami-Meibody (CfA), J. R. Farah (CfA), G. G. Fazio (CfA), E. Feigelson(PennStateUniv.), F. Fornasini (CfA), JayGallagher (Univ.Wisconsin), J.Grindlay(CfA),L.Hernquist(CfA),D.J.James(CfA),M.Karovska(CfA),V.Kashyap(CfA),D.-W.Kim(CfA),G.M.Lacy(NRAO),J.Lazio(JPL,Caltech),E.Lusso(Univ.ofFlorence,Italy;CfAcollaborator),W.P.Maksym(CfA),R.MartinezGalarza(CfA),J.Mazzarella(Caltech/IPAC), M. Ntampaka (CfA), G. Risaliti (Univ. of Florence, Italy; CfAcollaborator),D.Sanders(Institute forAstronomy,Hawaii),N.Scoville(Caltech), I.Shapiro(CfA),A.Siemiginowska(CfA),A.Smith(STScI),H.Smith(CfA),I.Stephens(CfA),A.Szentgyorgyi(CfA),S.Tacchella(CfA),A.Thakar(JohnsHopkinsUniv.),V.Tolls(CfA),S.Vrtilek(CfA),B.Wilkes(CfA),D.Wilner(CfA),S.P.Willner(CfA),S.J.Wolk(CfA)Zhao,J.-H.(CfA)

2

AbstractWewrite in response to the call from the2020Decadal Survey to submitwhitepapers illustrating themost pressing scientific questions in astrophysics for thecoming decade.We propose exploration as the central question for theDecadalCommittee’sdiscussions.Thehistoryofastronomyshowsthatparadigm-changingdiscoverieswerenotdrivenbywell-formulatedscientificquestions,basedontheknowledgeof thetime.Theywere insteadtheresultof the increase indiscoveryspace fostered by new telescopes and instruments. An additional tool forincreasing the discovery space is provided by the analysis and mining of theincreasingly larger amount of archival data available to astronomers.Revolutionary observing facilities, and the state-of-the-art astronomy archivesneededtosupportthesefacilities,willopenuptheuniversetonewdiscovery.This white paper includes science examples of the power of the discoveryapproach,encompassingalltheareasofastrophysicscoveredbythe2020DecadalSurvey.

TableofContents

1.TheExplorationQuestion page32.ExplorationinCompactObjects page43.ExplorationinStarsandStellarEvolution page64.ExplorationinPlanetarySystemsandPlanetFormation page85.ExplorationinResolvedStellarPopulations page106.ExplorationinGalaxyEvolution page127.ExplorationinCosmology page158.IncreasingtheDiscoverySpace page179.Conclusions page20

3

1. TheExplorationQuestionThere has been a long-standing tension in our discipline between the ‘exploration’approachandthemorephysics-based‘question-driven’approach.1.1-Thequestion-drivenapproachThisapproachseekstoformulatethemostimportantopenquestionsinourdiscipline.Itisbasedonourpresentknowledgeofthefield(boththeoreticalandobservational)andisformulated usually as a way to constrain and/or advance a currently proposedcosmological or astrophysical scenario. ‘Question/hypothesis-driven’ has been thepreferredapproachinthelastfewdecadesandisusedtojustifybothobservingproposalsandproposalsfornewinstrumentsandtelescopes.Mosttalksatconferencesandpapersare framed based on this question and answer approach. This is how we teach ourstudentstoapproachresearch.ThisistheapproachformulatedintheDecadalSurveycallforwhitepapers.Thisapproachaddressesthe‘knownunknowns’:forexample,thewaytobestconstrainthecosmologicalparametersofouruniverse,andlatelythesearchfordarkmatteranddarkenergy,andthedefinitivediscoveryofgravitationalwaves.Thequestion-drivenapproachcontinues tobe fruitful, and itgivesusacertainsenseofcontrolinourprogress,but-byitsownnature-isalsoalimitedandlimitingepistemology.Forexample,itcanbiasourknowledge.Asexpoundedinarecentarticlewithreferencetoextrasolarplanets“thekeyistomakesurethatsciencepolicypermitsdiscoveryforthesakeofdiscoveryandnotforfindingEarth-likeplanets,whichwehaveprejudicedtobeofgreatestinterest(D.J.Stevenson,CalTech,PhysicsToday,Nov.2018)”.Thesameopinioncanbeeasilyshapedtoapplytootherfieldsofastrophysics.The question-driven approach does not address the ‘unknown unknowns’ that by theirnaturecannotbeaddressedaswell-defined‘importantquestions’.1.2-TheexplorationapproachThisapproach,i.e.gainingthecapabilitytofindnewquestions,ratherthansolvingknownones, is the only waywe can address the unknownunknowns. Harwit (1984) calls this‘discoveryspace’.Thenotionthatmostofscienceisundiscoveredandthat‘outofthebook’thinking may be needed for real progress is making fast inroads (e.g., see the book‘Ignorance:HowitDrivesScience’byS.Firestein,2012).Howtobestfosterthediscoveryof unknown unknowns is particularly poignant for astronomy, which throughout itshistoryhasbeenfirstandforemostexploratory.The real big paradigm shifts in astronomy and astrophysics have occurred when newapproacheshavesignificantlyopenedupthediscoveryspace,revealingunforeseenviewsoftheuniverse.Theseapproachesmayhavebeenframedasawaytoaddressimportantquestions of the time, but the real advances were from serendipitous discoveries. Thediscovery spacemayhavebeen increasedbymeansofnew telescopes and instruments(bothhardwareandsoftware),andalsobyunanticipateddatarepurposing.Famousexamplesofdiscoveriesstemmingfromexplorationinclude:• The Galilean Moons of Jupiter, the metal composition of the Sun and stars, the HR

diagram, the expansion of the Universe, large scale structure, hot Jupiters (driven byimprovementsinopticaltelescopesandspectrographs);

4

• Quasars,radiogalaxies, themicrowavebackground,pulsars,superluminalmotion, fastradio bursts (following the invention of radio telescopes, VLBI, and search in thearchivesinthecaseofbursts);

• Black holes and theirmass range, darkmatter, dark energy, super-starburst galaxies(from the availability of new space-based observing windows, X-ray, IR, and highresolutionopticalimagingwithHST,andavailabilityofmulti-wavelengtharchives).

These foundational discoveries for the present understanding of the Universe and itsevolution were not in any way anticipated. Most of them were fostered by the use ofincreasingly larger telescopes andmore sensitive instruments, able to explore differentpartsoftheelectromagneticspectrum.Othersweresurprisingresultsofthedataanalysis.Giventheincreasingavailabilityoflargeandsurveydatasetsinouropenarchives,anewhybrid approach,question-driven exploration, has emerged,where astronomershavemined these data and researched the literature guided by relatively vague questions,finding answers, newquestions, and surprises.A similar approach ismaking inroads inbiology(Elliottetal2016).Inthiswhitepaperwediscussthe‘explorationquestion’,providingexamplesrelevantforthe fieldscoveredby the2020DecadalSurvey.Giventhenatureofexploration, it isnotpossibletogivedefinitequestionsthatneedtobeaddressedinthenearfuture.Rather,weprovideafewexamplesof(1)serendipitousunexpecteddiscoveries(unknownunknowns)and their potential for changing established paradigms; and (2) new research avenuesposedbyaskingverygeneralquestions(knownunknowns).Wedonotmeantoprovideanexhaustive survey of such discoveries, but only to illustrate our case with a fewrepresentativestudies(Sections2-7).InSection8,weaddressourrecommendationsforincreasingthediscoveryspace,andinSection9wegivehigh-levelconclusions.

2.ExplorationinCompactObjects

Although there were a few theoretical predictions beforehand, compact objects areexcellentexemplarsofdiscoveriesmadethroughexploration.Inthespaceofafewyears,neutronstarswere foundbothaspulsars, seenas “scruff” inradiosurveydata (Hewish,Belletal.1968),andasbrightperiodicX-raysources;blackholeswere foundasrapidlyvariable X-ray sources and, later, dynamically with spectroscopy of the secondaries offadedX-raytransients(McClintockandRemillard1986).Gamma-rayburstsdiscoveredatthe same time (Klebesadel et al., 1973) were mysterious for decades but also impliedcompactobjects.Fastradioburstsareamorerecentdiscoveryandmaybeconnectedwithcompactobjects.Inadditiontobeingtotallyunexpecteddiscoveries,compactobjects(includingstellar-massblack holes and neutron stars), required observations at wavelengths other than thewavelength of their discovery (typically X-ray, radio or gamma-ray) before their truenature could be determined. An explanation for radio pulsars was developed withinmonths of their discovery (Gold 1968), for X-ray binaries within years of discovery(Pringle & Rees 1972), and for gamma-ray bursts we are only now, more than half acenturylater,beginningtounderstandtheirnature:

• Radio pulsars provided us with the first (indirect) evidence for the existence ofgravitational waves. Pulsar glitches led to the recognition of solid crusts on neutronstars,andneutronstarsofferwaystotestthenatureofthestrongnuclearforceviatheirequationofstate.

5

• X-ray binaries use themost efficientmeans known of extracting energy frommatter.Their messy phenomenology revealed its hidden order when color-color and color-intensitydiagrams fromarchivaldata showedclearpathsbetweendifferentaccretionstates (Done & Gierlinski 2003), reflecting the balance of disk and jet emission asaccretionrateschange.

• TheknownmassrangeofstellarblackholeswasgreatlyextendedbyLIGOgravitationalwave detections (Abbott et al 2017a). Joint observations of gravitational wave signalGW170817 by the LIGO-Virgo detector network and transient electromagneticcounterparts from multiple telescopes resulted in a triumph for multi-messengerastronomy:discoveryofaninspiralingbinaryneutronstar(Abbottetal.2017b).

• Bright X-ray bursts (discovery paper, Grindlay, Gursky et al 1976) are energeticphenomena typical of accreting neutron stars in binaries, associated withthermonuclearflashesontheNSsurface(seee.g.,reviewLewinetal1995).

• Gamma-raybursts,whicharethemostenergeticphenomenaknowntohumanity,havebeen connected with neutron star mergers, resulting in the first multi-messengerobservationsofgravitationalwaveevents(e.g.,Haggard,etal.,2017).Multi-wavelengthlightcurvescanprovideaphysicalviewofthephenomenon(Kasliwaletal.2017).

• FastRadioBurstsare transientphenomena lastingonlymilliseconds,aresuspectedofbeing compact objects, andmany are being discovered by an instrument designed tolook for redshifted 21cm hydrogen emission (Chime/FRB Collaboration 2019). Thereare dozens of ideas about what theymightbe, but no way to discern between them.FRBsmayprovidenewcosmologicaltests(Jaroszynski,2019).

The archival data available at differentwavelengths provide a resource for exploration,both for identifying new phenomena that may be related to compact objects, findingprecursorobjects,andinvestigatingsystematicsinnewlyidentifiedclasses.Forexample:• A blind search for pulsations of 13 years of XMM observations containing 50 billionphotonsledtothediscoveryofthefirstextragalacticX-raypulsar inaglobularclusterand the first pulsar in the Andromeda galaxy,which is also the second slowest X-raypulsarknown(p=1.2sec,Zolotukhinetal.,2017).Thislongperiodchallengestheoriesofbinary star formation and evolution in clusters, as it must have started accretingrecently,about1Myrago,yetishostedina12Gyr-oldglobularcluster.

• Archival searches for fast radio bursts are ongoing and beginning to produce results(e.g.,Zhangetal.,2019).

• SpectralandtimingpropertiesofpopulationsofX-raysourcesdiscoveredwithChandrain nearby galaxies have been used to compare them with the known behavior ofcompactGalacticbinaries.Color-color-intensitydiagramswereusedtoseparateclassesof X-ray binary (black holes and neutron stars) and to separate jet-producing versusnon-jet-producing XRBs. This is directly akin to color-magnitude, Hertzprung-Russelldiagramsforstars,whichwasalsounanticipated(Vrtilek&Boroson2013).

• Comparison withHubble imaging and photometry have led to extraction of globularcluster binaries; association of binaries with different stellar population age andmetallicity; and even to the realization that both globular clusters and X-ray binariesmaytracemergingaccretioneventsingiantellipticalgalaxies.Thesecomparisonshaveledtoconstraintsonthenatureofthesesourcesandtheirevolution(e.g.,seereviews:Fabbiano2006;2019).

6

Theidentificationoffasttimingeventsatdifferentwavelengthswillalsorequirearchivaldatabases for studying thebaseline state andpast historyof the associatedobject.As acase in point, researchers racing to find an optical counterpart to binary neutron starmerger GW170817 made use of NED to point the Swope telescope and discover anafterglowinlenticulargalaxyNGC4993only11hoursaftertheGWtrigger(Coulteretal.2017); this led to development of a new service1to facilitate follow-up observations ofGWevents. NewcomputationaltechniquespowerfulenoughtoprocessTB/dayratesofhigh-dimensionaldatawith lowlatencywillbe important tomulti-messengerastronomyintheLSSTplusLIGO+,VIRGO,KAGRA,INDIGOera.

3. ExplorationinStarsandStellarEvolutionGiventhenatureofexploration,itisnotpossibletogivedefinitequestionsthatneedtobeaddressed in the near future. Rather, we provide a few examples of (1) serendipitousunexpecteddiscoveries(unknownunknowns)andtheirpotential forchangingestablishedparadigms;and(2)newresearchavenuesposedbyaskingverygeneralquestions(knownunknowns).Wedonotmeantoprovideanexhaustivesurveyofsuchdiscoveries,butonlytoillustrateourcasewithafewrepresentativestudies.3.1UnanticipateddiscoveriesfromHubbleandotherspaceobservatoriesPastthefirstdiscoveryperiodthatdefinedstellarphysicalandchemicalproperties,andspurred the first theoretical work on the stellar engine and stellar evolution, stellarastronomy / astrophysics is an areawhere discovery guided by theoreticalmodels hasbeenpredominantandworkswell.Despitethis, theadventofobservationswithHubble,withitshighangularresolution,hasprovidedunexpecteddiscoveries,forexample(1)thecomplexstellarpopulationsofglobularclusters (Grattonetal.2012;Piottoetal.2015),and (2) themajor role of binary star evolution inmass ejection, e.g., in stellar systemsrangingfromtheproductionofplanetarynebulaetobinarystarmergers(Jones&Boffin2017;Smithetal.2016,Tylenda&Soaker2006).Newgenerations ofmulti-wavelengthdata have led to new insights into stellar physics.The enhanced capabilities provided by space observatories fostered multi-wavelengthstellarresearchleadingtounanticipatedresults,suchas:

• The detection of black hole transients, and routinely finding dusty disks accretingmatterontoprotostars(withanaccretionshockdetectedwithChandrainTWHya),andproducing jets (Burrows et al. 1996,McCaughrean&O’Dell 1996,Kastner et al 2002;Prisinzanoetal.2008).

• Thedetectionofstellaroscillations,especiallyinevolvedredgiantstarsbyCoRoTandKepler,whichopenedapowerfulavenuetoteststellarmodels(Chaplin&Miglio2013),

• The detection of γ-rays fromnovae in outburst,which revealed their ability to act asshock-poweredhigh-energyparticleaccelerators(Ackermannetal.2014).

• ThediscoveryofcoronalactivityinanearbybrowndwarfwithChandra,showingthatthese ultra-cool objects undergo energetic reconnection flares similar to fusion-

1https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/gwf/

7

poweredstarsliketheSun(Rutledgeetal.2000).Theabilitytoconnectavarietyofmulti-wavelengthobservationstosophisticatedmodelsis a key factor behind these advances. Progress thus depends on access to data byresearcherswithawidevarietyofbackgrounds.3.2NewunderstandingfromarchivalstudiesNewresearchavenuesareopenedbythepresenceofthegrowingamountofstellardataavailable in astronomy archives, and by the availability of powerful software tools toexploitthesedata. Inthesetypesofprojectsexplorationcomesfromthecaptureofhighquality data for large samples of objects. Hundreds of thousands of high quality stellarspectrahavebeencollectedbydifferentobservatoriesoverthelastthreedecadesandputinto data archives. Tools to determine stellar atmospheric parameters (effectivetemperature, surface gravity, elemental abundances, rotation) evolved over time andbecamematureonlyafewyearsagothanksinparticulartothedevelopmentinthefieldofstudies of exoplanets. New methods of data exploration are also coming to the fore,especiallybasedonclassificationandclusteringbasedonmachinelearning.Examplesofthisapproachinclude:

• AMBRE,aprojectthatre-processedsome52,000high-resolutionstellarspectracollectedwith4differentinstrumentsattheEuropeanSouthernObservatory(Worleyetal.2012;deLavernyetal.2013). Bycombiningprecisemeasurementsofstellarparametersandradial velocities obtained from spectrawithGaia information on distances and propermotions,archivalstudies intheareaofGalacticastronomyhaveanenormouspotentialin the next decade. Analyzing the archival stellar spectra in a uniform way anddeterminingstellarpropertieswillhelptopindownsomeof theunsolvedquestionsofstellarevolutionandsynthesisofheavyelementsinstellarinteriors.

• Thediscoveryofadiagonalrotationperiodgradientacross themainsequence instarsfromGaiaDataRelease2,matchedwithrotationperiodsfromKepler,whichmaybeduetometallicityeffects(Davenport&Covey2018;Davenport2019).

Avarietyofstellarspectroscopicsurveysareinprogressorplannedforthenextdecade,with a variety of goals. These surveys will provide huge accessible archival databases.Theyinclude:

• APOGEE,aprogramintheSloanDigitalSurveyIVdesignedtostudystellarabundancespatternsintheMilkyWay.

• ULLYSES,therecentlyannouncedprojectfromSTScIthatseekstoproduceafulllibraryof ultraviolet spectra of massive stars in the SMC, to provide a knowledge base formodeling stars at lowmetallicity. This projectwill gain support from a number of PI-programsofoptical spectroscopyofmassive stars in theSMC, suchas those thatwereenabledbythecapabilitiesatESOformoderate-to-highspectralresolutionmulti-objectobservationsoversubstantialfieldsofview.

These studies will further benefit from connections to future multi-messenger surveyssuchasthephotometricstudiesbyWFIRSTandSPHEREx,aswellasnewgenerationsofgravitywaveandneutrinoobservatories.Theresultswillimpactextragalacticastronomybecausenewgenerationsofstellarpopulationmodelscanbecreatedutilizing improvedstellarastrophysicsandusedtoquantitativelyexploretheevolutionofgalaxies.Thetimedomainalsoisanareawhereenhancedcapabilitiesledtonewdiscoveriesandwheremoreprogresswillcome,e.g.,withtheadventofLSST.ExamplesincludetheOGLE

8

gravitational lensing surveys that led to new understanding of the structure of theMagellanic Clouds. Many optical transient surveys have enriched greatly ourunderstanding of supernovae and stellar variability. Key features of these programsinclude systematic approaches to the capture, analysis, and delivery of results to thecommunity.

4. ExplorationinPlanetarySystemsandPlanetFormationGiventhenatureofexploration,itisnotpossibletogivedefinitequestionsthatneedtobeaddressed in the near future. Rather, we provide a few examples of (1) serendipitousunexpecteddiscoveries(unknownunknowns)andtheirpotentialforchangingestablishedparadigms;and(2)newresearchavenuesposedbyaskingverygeneralquestions(knownunknowns).Wedonotmeantoprovideanexhaustivesurveyofsuchdiscoveries,butonlytoillustrateourcasewithafewrepresentativestudies.4.1 PulsarplanetsAleksander Wolszczan (2000) discovered the first exoplanet and the first multipleexoplanetsystem(Konacki&Wolszczan2003)inaplacewherenobodywouldeverhaveexpected to find one: Orbiting a pulsar. This was done with Arecibo, a powerfulinstrumentthatwasclearlynotdesignedforthepurposeoffindingpulsarplanets.4.2 HotJupiters51Pegb,thefirstexoplanetfoundorbitingamainsequencestar,isahotJupiter.Thatisatype of planet that no theorist would have imagined could form. A week after itsdiscovery,itwasconfirmedbylookingatarchivaldatafromtheLickObservatory.Thisisa bit of a mixed discovery --- partly serendipitous, partly question-driven ---. MichaelMayorandDidierQueloz(1995),andotherpeoplewereinfacttryingtofindexoplanets.Butthethingtheyfoundwasnotatallwhattheyexpected.4.3 CompactshortperiodplanetsystemsTheKeplermissionsetouttofindthefrequencyofEarth-likeplanets.Althoughitsortoffailed in that mission because the momentum wheels broke, Kepler was an incrediblysuccessfulmission because it found awhole newpopulation of planets thatwe did notknow even existed. The Galaxy is littered with compact planetary systems with orbitalperiods well inside the orbit of Mercury. This again, is a mix of "question driven" and"explorationdriven"discovery.Keplerwasdesignedtoansweronequestion,butitsgreatestcontributiontothefieldwasinansweringaquestionthatnoonehadasked.4.4 Super-Earthsandmini-NeptunesTheopensearchforplanetarytransitsbytheKeplermissionledtothediscoverythatthemostcommonclassofplanetisonethatdoesnotexistinoursolarsystem–onethathasasizelargerthanEarth,butsmallerthanNeptune(2-10EarthRadii)andtypicallyperiodslongerthanthreedays.Thenatureofthesenovelplanetsisambiguousastheylieneartheboundary between rocky planets and gas giants. These planets may have theiratmospheresstrippedbyhigh-energyparticles fromthehoststar(c.f.Fulton&Petigura2018).

9

4.5 AtmosphericHazeHeated and extended atmospheres have beendetected around severalHot Jupiters andhotNeptunes.Photometryhas suggested theexistenceof inhomogeneousSilicate-basedcloud layers in several hot Neptune systems. Transmission spectroscopy has detectedsodiumandwatervaporintheatmospheresofhotJupiters,as well asunpredictedhazes,madeofsolidparticlesinanatmospherethatwereformedbyphotochemistry. 4.6 HLTauanditsprotoplanetarydiskHL Tau is a very young (105 years) T Tauri star surrounded by an equally youngprotoplanetarydisk.Figure1showsanALMAimageofHLTau.Theseobservationswerescience verification taken by ALMA to test the long interferometric baselines. Nobodyexpectedtoseesuchsubstructureinadiskthatissoyoung. The imageofHLTaushowsthisverydistinctringstructureandnobody'sreallysureofwhatitmeans.RecallthatALMAshowsthelocationofthedustcomponentofthedisk.Sothedustisinrings.Why?Couldtheblackregionsbegapscausedbyplanets?Thatishardtobelievegivenhowyoungthesystemisandhowmanygapsthereare.Maybethedustisbeingaccumulated insidepressurebumps inthegasthatarecausedby...something?Orperhapstherearenopressurebumps...perhapsthegapsarethesignatureofdustbeingconvertedintoplanetesimals...maybe. Inanycase,westilldonotknowwhatthis imagemeans, but we do know that HL Tau is not unique. ALMA has since found similarstructuresinmanyotherprotoplanetarydisks(e.g.,Andrewsetal(2018);vanderMareletal.2019),andthere isnowagreatdealofeffort in trying tounderstandwhat thisallmeans.HLTau is againpartly anexampleofquestion-drivenandexploration-drivendiscovery.ALMAwasintendedtostudyprotoplanetarydisks.Butnobodyhadexpectedsuchyoungprotoplanetarydiskstohavethismanyrings.Thatdiscoverycameasaby-productofthenewcapabilitiesprovidedbyALMA.

Figure1.-ALMA(2015)imageoftheHLTaudisk

10

4.7 ProtoplanetarydiskionizationFor decades, astrophysical models of the Solar Nebula and (later) protoplanetary diskstreated them as cold structures of gas and dust with no external effects other thangravitationalattractionandblackbodyheatingfromtheirhoststar.Butin1991,Balbus&Hawley(ApJ,3000citations)realizedthatonly10-12fractionalionizationofcoldmolecularmaterial is sufficient to initiate the magneto-rotational instability, rapidly building amagneticdynamoand induceMHD turbulence. This solvedsomeproblems (providingasourceofviscosityneededforaccretion,andmitigatingTypeIinwardmigrationofJovianprotoplanets) but raised other problems (inhibiting dust settling needed to initiateplanetesimal growth). Hundreds of theoretical studies relating to planet formation inturbulentdisksemerged,butalsounexpectedinteractionswithobservations.Chandra, NASA’s flagship X-ray observatory, was studying variable X-ray emission inthousandsofpre-mainsequencestars. Theseempirical studiesshowed thathardX-raysfrom protostellar magnetic reconnection flares can penetrate deep into the disks, andprobablydominatetheionizationoftheplanetformingregion.Thus,atelescopedesignedto elucidate superheated disks around black holes is surprisingly addressing theastrophysicsofcoldcircumstellardisksgivingrisetoplanetarysystems.

5.ExplorationinResolvedStellarPopulationsGiventhenatureofexploration,itisnotpossibletogivedefinitequestionsthatneedtobeaddressed in the near future. Rather, we provide a few examples of (1) serendipitousunexpecteddiscoveries(unknownunknowns)andtheirpotential forchangingestablishedparadigms;and(2)newresearchavenuesposedbyaskingverygeneralquestions(knownunknowns).Wedonotmeantoprovideanexhaustivesurveyofsuchdiscoveries,butonlytoillustrateourcasewithafewrepresentativestudies.5.1ThePanchromaticHubbleAndromedaTreasury(PHAT)surveyPHAT(Dalcantonetal.2012)consistsofanimagingsurveyof~1/3ofM31'sstar-formingdisk in six filters, UV to NIR, to study resolved stellar populations in a controlledenvironment, at a given distance and metallicity while also avoiding the difficulties ofobservingstarsthroughtheinclineddiskofourownMilkyWay.PHATresolvedM31intomillions of individual stars, providing excellent constrains on stellar temperatures,bolometric luminosities, and extinction. Unanticipated discoveries from the subsequentexploration of the dataset, and from combining it with other multi-wavelength surveys,include:

• ThediscoveryofweakCNstars,apreviouslyunknowntypeofcarbonstarthatappearstobeassociatedwiththeHe-burningphaseofrelativelymassivestars(Masegianetal.2019).

• The apparent universality of the high-mass (M>1M_sun) Initial Mass Function (IMF)acrossabroadrangeofclustermasses,ages,andsizes(Weizsetal.2013),

• The strong UV bump in the extinction curve in the central region of M31, whichindicatesthatdustdestructionbysupernovaexplosionsarecommoninbulgesofspirals(Dongetal.2014).

11

5.2CharacterizationofthestructureoftheMilkyWayhaloviadataexploration.Unexpected discoveries about the morphology of the Galactic halo stem from theexplorationandminingofseverallargedatasets:

• UsingastrometricdatafromGaia(Lindegrenetal.2018),Prince-Whelanetal.(2018b)found a young, low-massmetal-poor stellar associationwhile searching for groups ofco-movingbluestarsinthefarendoftheGalactichalo.Itsageandlocationsuggestthatthisassociationwas formedwhenthe leadingarmof theMagellanicCloudgasstreamlastencounteredtheM.W.disk.

• With a joint Gaia and Pan-STARRs study, Price-Whelan et al. (2018a) discovered anextensionofGD-1,thelongestknowncoldstreamintheGalactichalo.Theyderivedthepositionoftheprogenitortidallydisruptedglobularclusteranddetectedover-densitiesin thestreamthatmightberelated toperturbationby the long-predicteddark-mattersubhalos.

• UsingDeimosspectra(Keck-II)and thePalomarTransientFacilityDatabase,Cohenetal. (2017) traced over-densities in the outer Galactic halo via the identification ofvariable RR-lyrae stars, whose heliocentric distancewas directly obtained from theirlightcurve.

• While inspecting HST photometry of the cluster NGC 6752 for the presence of whitedwarfs,Bedinetal. (2019)discoveredadwarf spheroidalgalaxynear thegalaxyNGC6744.

5.3ThebonesoftheMilkyWayDetermining the3Dstructureof theMilkyWay fromourpositionveryclose to itsmid-planehasbeenaperpetualchallengeforastronomers.Dataexplorationcanprovideawayaroundthis.Agoodexample is thediscoverythat thepreviously identified filamentary infrareddarkcloud (IRDC) known asNessie is in fact a very long structure that runs along the verycenter of the Scutum-Centaurus spiral arm of our galaxy, and acts as a "spine" thatsupports it. This realization came from re-analyzing archival Spitzer imaging data andcombining itwithkinematicpropertiesderived fromstar-forminggas tracedbyCOandNH3(Goodmanetal.2014).TheunexpecteddiscoveryofthesedensestructuresthatrunalongthespiralarmsoftheMilkyWayand the realization that theSun isoffsetbyabout25pc from theplane thatcontains them, provide a new advantageous perspective for the observer, and opens anewavenueforinvestigationsofthe3DstructureofourGalaxy.5.4MultiplestellarpopulationsinglobularclustersGlobularClustersweretraditionallythoughtassingle,firstgenerationstellarpopulations.Observationalevidenceoverthelastdecadehascompletelychangedthisview.Foragivenglobularcluster,distinctpopulationsenriched inHe,NandNa,anddistinctpopulations

12

depletedinOandC,createcomplexpatternsinthecolor-magnitudediagramthatcannotbeexplainedbyindividualstellarmixingandstellarevolution(Bastian&Lardo,2018).This discovery was highly unexpected. It came about through the exploration of largephotometric datasets fromHST observations, originally intended to characterize stellarevolutionofasinglepopulations.Although several ideas have been put forward in order to explain this ‘multiplepopulations problem’, e.g., several bursts of star formation within the cluster, none ofthesetheoriescanexplainalltheavailableobservationalevidence.Explorationofexistingandupcomingpanchromaticsurveys(Pan-STARRS,Gaia,LSST)arelikelytoboostanewwayofdiscoveriesandpossiblyprovidesomeneededanswers.Researchinthisparticularareamayprovidenewastrophysicalinsightaboutstellarevolutionandstarformationintheearlyuniverse.5.5FuturedataminingoftheHubblearchiveThe great heritage of the Hubble Space Telescope includes multi-color imaging forhundredsofstarclusters in theMilkyWayandMagellanicClouds,collectedbydifferentobservingprograms.Theresultsfromthemanystudiesbasedontheseimagesarehardoreven impossible tocompare,because theywereprocessedusingaheterogeneoussetoftools to perform photometry and then interpreted using a variety of stellar populationmodels(e.g.isochrones).TheHubbleLegacyArchivehasproducedauniformsetofdataproductsfromthesedata,sothatnowthephotometrycanbeextractedhomogeneouslyacrosstheentirecollectionand then analyzed using one or several particular sets of stellar population models.Explorationofthisuniformlargearchivaldatasetmayprovideanswerstoquestionssuchas:Whydid theLargeMagellanicCloudnot formany star clustersbetween9and3Gyrago?What is thebinary star fraction in clusters, and is it affectedby the clustered starformation?Howdidstarclusterswithmultiplestellarpopulationform?

6.ExplorationinGalaxyEvolutionGiventhenatureofexploration,itisnotpossibletogivedefinitequestionsthatneedtobeaddressed in the near future. Rather, we provide a few recent examples of (1)serendipitous unexpected discoveries (unknown unknowns) and their potential forchanging established paradigms; and (2) new research avenues posed by asking verygeneralquestions (knownunknowns), suchas exploring theevolutionof galaxies,whichwas themain driver of the COSMOS survey.We do notmean to provide an exhaustivesurvey of such discoveries, but only to illustrate our case with a few representativestudies.6.1UnanticipateddiscoveriesfromimprovedobservationalcapabilitiesBelowwegivefourexamplesofunanticipatedimportantdiscoveries,stemmingfromtheopeningofnewobservationalwindowsduetotheavailabilityofnewcapabilities.Thefirstthreearewell-knowndiscoveries,whichhaveledtotheacceptedscenarioofjointgalaxy-supermassive black hole evolution. The fourth example is a recent serendipitous

13

discovery thatmaychange thewaywe thinkaboutAGNsand their interactionwith thecoldISM.BlackHolesbecameanobservationalrealitywithmassmeasurementsofaccretingBHX-raybinaries (first,CygX-1,Bolton1972).ThediscoveryofquasarsandAGNs led to thesuccessfulmodelofaccretionontomassiveBHsingalaxynuclei(Pringleetal1973).WithHST dynamicalmeasurements, thewidespread existence of supermassive BH became agenerally accepted fact (Magorrianet al1998), leading toourpresentunderstandingofgalaxy-BHco-evolution.Thehotgasofclustersandgalaxiesisnowakey‘observational’propertyofsimulationsofgalaxyformationandevolution.Ittracestheuniverse’sdarkmatterconcentrationsandisresponsivetostellarandAGNfeedback.However,until~50yrsagonobodyhadthoughtof itsexistence.ObservationswiththefirstX-rayastronomysatellite,Uhuru (Giacconietal.1971)ledtothediscoveryofthehotintra-clustermedium(Kelloggetal.1971;Gurskyet al. 1971). An imagingX-ray telescope, theEinsteinObservatory (Giacconi et al 1979),wasneededtodiscoverhothalosinellipticalgalaxies(previouslybelievedtobedevoidofISM), and hot outflows from active star-forming galaxies and mergers (see review,Fabbiano1989).WiththespectralimagingcapabilityofChandra+ACIS,theinteractionofAGNswith thesehothalos (radio feedback; e.g.Paggi et al2014)and the interactionofthese hot halos with the intra-cluster medium are being mapped, providing a detailedpictureofthedynamicaluniverse.Extremely intense star-formation is a key stage of galaxy evolution. This field of studiesfollowedthediscoveryofextremeobjects(ultraluminousinfraredgalaxies,ULIRGS)withthe infraredmission IRAS (Soiferet al1984).Theirpreponderanceathigh redshiftwasdemonstrated by deep HST observations (Madau et al 1998). ALMA has uncovered apopulationofhigh-z,high-mass,dustystar-forminggalaxies,withstar-formationrates>1000 Msol/yr (Blain et al 2002). These results are the foundation of our presentunderstandingofgalaxymergingevolution.Theextendedhardcontinuum(>3keV)andFeKαemissionofComptonThickAGNs.Thisisaveryrecent,surprisingdiscoveryofX-raysub-arcsecondspectralimaging,onlypossiblewith Chandra (Fabbiano et al 2017, Fig. 2). These extended components question theaccepted model of simply torus-shrouded active nuclei and open a new avenue forexploringtheobservationalintricaciesoftheAGN-galaxyinteraction.

Figure2.–ESO428-G014->2kpc-scalehardcontinuumand~1kpcFeKlineemission(Fabbianoetal2017)

14

6.2NewunderstandingfromarchivalstudiesSeveral astronomical databases and data sets are freely available from astronomyarchives and their community use is vigorous. Frequently these data sets aremined incombinationwithotherdatabasesorcomplementedwithnewobservations.Forexample:

• Thediscoveryofanewclassofsuperluminousspiralgalaxies,asopticallyluminousasfirst-ranked ellipticals in galaxy clusters, was made by mining multiwavelength datasynthesizedwithintheNASA/IPACExtragalacticDatabase(NED)(Ogleetal.2016).

• Workflowsbasedon IVOA2standardsand tools ledChilingarianetal. (2009;2015) toexpand to over 200 the sample of compact elliptical (cE) galaxies, of which only 6examples were known, using archival HST images of nearby galaxy clusters andadditional information from archives and databases, and mining SDSS and GALEXsurveydata.TheseworkssuggestformationbytidalstrippingandcDejectionfromhostclustersandgroupsbythree-bodyencounters.

A few illustrative recent examplesbasedon theCOSMOSmulti-wavelength surveyhaveprobedtheevolutionofgalaxiesandnuclearactivityouttolargeredshift:• AconnectionbetweenAGNactivityandmergingouttoz~3.5:thefractionofCompton

Thick (CT, NH>1024 erg s-1) AGNs in mergers/interacting systems increases withluminosityandredshift(Lanzuisietal.2018).

• Mature quenched bulges, discovered in star-forming galaxies at z~2, by mappingCOSMOSgalaxieswithHSTandVLT/SINFONI(Tacchellaetal.2015).

• Amassive,dustystarburstinagalaxyprotoclusteratz=5.7,serendipitouslydiscoveredin theCOSMOSField (complementedbyALMAandVLA), forming stars at a rateof atleast1500M�yr-1ina~3kpccompactregion(Pavesietal.2018).

• Massiveproto-clustersofgalaxiesatz~5.7andz~4.6,discoveredintheCOSMOSfield,using spectroscopic observations taken from Keck and the Visible Multi-ObjectSpectrograph(VIMOS)Ultra-DeepSurvey(Capaketal.2011;Lemauxetal.2018).

• Over-massive BH (~109Msol) discovered in a 1010Msol star forming galaxy at z~3.3(COSMOS+Keck),providinganexamplewhereBHgrowthmaynotbesymbioticwithgalaxygrowth(Trakhtenbrotetal.2015).

• The nature and luminosity function of galaxies with z~7-9 were explored using theCOSMOS/UltraVISTAdatabasecomplementedwithHST imagingandSpitzer(Stefanonetal.2017;Bowleretal.2017).

2InternationalVirtualObservatoryAlliance;theforumforthedevelopmentoftheinteroperabilitystandardsusedbymajorastronomydatacenters(http://www.ivoa.net)

15

7.ExplorationinCosmologyGiventhenatureofexploration,itisnotpossibletogivedefinitequestionsthatneedtobeaddressed in the near future. Rather, we provide a few recent examples of (1)serendipitous unexpected discoveries (unknown unknowns) and their potential forchanging established paradigms; and (2) new research avenues posed by asking verygeneralquestions(knownunknowns),suchasconstrainingthecosmologicalparameters.Wedonotmeantoprovideanexhaustivesurveyofsuchdiscoveries,butonlytoillustrateourcasewithafewrepresentativestudies.7.1UnanticipateddiscoveriesCosmology is perhaps the best example of a field thatwas stimulated by observationaldiscoveries,interplayingwiththeoreticalmodels,beginningwiththeHubblediagramandtheHubble-Lemaitrelaw.ThecurrentstandardLambdaCDM(ColdDarkMatter)modeloftheobservedUniversecomesfromthediscoveryofdarkmatterhavingseveraltimesthemass density of normal baryonic matter. The subsequent discovery of dark energyrelegatesbaryonicmattertojustbelow5%ofthecontentoftheUniverse.Dark Matter - The discovery of Dark Matter is based on serendipitous results ofobservationalstudies.Thefirst–controversial-directevidencewasgivenbyFritzZwickyin1933onthebasisofthevirialmassestimateintheComaclusterwhiletryingtorefinetheHubble-Lemaitrerelation.Theideadidnotgetabroadacceptanceatthetime:manyastronomersconsideredanalternativeexplanationtothemassproblembyassumingthatgalaxy clusters are transient, non-virialized complexes. Convincing arguments for theneedofthedarkmattercamefromthestudiesoftherotationcurvesinspiralgalaxies,butthisstudywasoriginallyundertakentounderstandthedynamicalpropertiesandmassesof galaxies throughout the Hubble sequence (Rubin et al. 1978). The gravitationalattraction seen is clearly stronger than could be accounted for by the visible baryonicmatter. There are expectations that this non-baryonic matter is in the form of someweakly interactingparticle, but nodirect detection of suchparticles has been achieved,and the arguments for detection of gamma-rays from their decay from astronomicalsourceshavebeenquestioned.DarkenergywasintroducedbyAlbertEinsteinintheformofacosmologicalconstantbutestimates of its role based on the local and high redshift observations only started toappear in1980s(Peebles1988), toexplainobservationalresults: thegrowthrateof thelarge-scale structure seemed to require faster expansionof theUniverse thanpredictedbythegravitational forces.Theconvincingargumentcamefromatotallyindependentlineof study – from Supernovae Ia (Riess et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999). SNIa arestandardizable,andthusrelativelyeasytouseforcosmology.7.2NewUnderstandingfromsurvey/archivalstudies:NewcosmologyprobesInthelastdecadethevaluesofthecosmologicalparametersinthestandardLambdaCDMmodelhavebeendeterminedpreciselybycombining the independentmeasurementsoftheCosmicMicrowaveBackground(CMB),SNIa,andBaryonAcousticOscillations(BAO).Combiningthemethodswasessential,sincethereisconsiderableparameterdegeneracyin any single model. This degeneracy is due to the limited range of redshifts in each

16

method,therelativelylargeerrorsinindividualmeasurements,andthelimitednumberofmeasurements.Recently,tensionisappearingbetweenthenewestmeasurementsandthestandard model. These studies typically use and combine new extensive data bases, oftenobtainedfordifferentpurposes.Examplesinclude:• Riessetal.(2018),combiningHSTphotometryandGaiaDR2parallaxesofCepheidsto

simultaneously constrain the cosmic distance scale and to measure the Gaia DR2parallaxzeropointoffsetappropriateforCepheids.TheyreportatensionbetweenthenewestlocalmeasurementsoftheHubbleconstantandthosebasedontheCMBatclosetothe4sigmalevel.

• Risaliti&Lusso(2019),makinguseofasampleof1,600quasars frompublicarchives(XMM-Newton and SDSS), complemented with new XMM-Newton observations,determined adeviation from theLambdaCDMmodel at the~4 sigma level using theobserved non-linear relation between AGN broad band UV/X-ray flux ratio and UVluminosity.

• Emami et al. (2019), studying the clustering amplitude of a complete sample of 7143clusters in theSloansurvey, report that theobservedcorrelation lengthexceedspureCDM simulation prediction by ~6% for the standard Plank-based parameters. Thisexcessmaybeexplainedbyfreestreamingoflightneutrinos.

These discrepancies suggest the possibility of new physics beyond the standard ΛCDMcosmology. The combination of different, sometimes new, approaches, supported by anincreaseddataqualityandsamplestatistics, isthewayforwardtosolvethedarkmatteranddarkenergyproblems.Inthefuture,weexpectcosmologicalresultsfromarangeofastronomicalmeasurements,makinguseofpubliclyreleasedsurveysandusing tailoredanalysisworkflows,includingweaklensing(e.g.,Mandelbaum2018),stronggravitationallensing events (e.g., Cao et al. 2015), Supernovae II (de Jaeger 2015), Active GalacticNuclei reverberationmapping (AGN;Cackett et al. 2007,Watsonet al. 2011,Haas et al.2011), galaxy clusters through combined X-ray and Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect (e.g.,Bonamenteetal.2006),gamma-raybursts(Schaefer2007),andgravitationalwaveevents(Abbottetal.2017).Whilethemethodstousetheseprobesarestillindevelopment,somepromisingresultsarecoming,pavingthewayforfurtheradvancesinthe2020s

17

8.IncreasingtheDiscoverySpace

8.1ObservingfacilitiesthatexpandboundariesAny new observing facilities/missions for the next decade should significantly improveperformance in some keymetric (e.g., energy range, sensitivity, exposure time, angularresolution, higher dimensional data, rapid response), and be well characterized andcalibrated, so to provide flexibility for new observing avenues. Hubble, Spitzer andChandraprovideexamplesinthediscoveryofDarkEnergy,thedetectionofz=11galaxies,andthenatureofDarkMatter(BulletCluster),respectively.Beyondhardwarecapabilitiesthesediscoveriesrequire:missionlongevity,communitydrivenscience,high-qualitydataproducts in readily accessible, interoperable, archives and a well-supporteduser/observercommunity.

8.2Multi-wavelengthandmulti-messengercapabilities

Many historical examples also demonstrate a strong synergy between differentwavebands and messengers. Having contemporaneous access to the entireelectromagneticspectrumwasvitaltofindingthefirstcounterparttoagravitationalwavesource, for example. This multi-wavelength coverage of the sky that we are currentlyenjoyingneedstobepreserved.

8.3CuratedDataArchivesandPowerfulDataAnalysistools

Thesenewfacilitieswillgenerateincreasingly largerandcomplexmulti-wavelengthandmulti-messengerdatasetsandcatalogs.Thesedatawillneedtobeproperlyreducedandcuratedtofullyenabletheirdiscoverypotential.Archivesmustprovidebotheasyaccesstothesedataand(withthecommunity)themeanstoexploitthem.

Theabovegoalstranslateinto:

(1) Ensure that any operational (old and new) facility/mission explicitly include in theirscopetheproperprocessingofsoftwaresotoproducewelldocumentedandcalibrateddataproducts,aswellasthecapabilityfordatarecalibrationandreprocessing.

(2) Organize these data products inwell-maintained archives, following the InternationalVirtualObservatoryAlliance (IVOA)3standards, so toallowabasic levelofaccessandinteroperability, as well as repurposing. Much of this is already in place in the NASAarchives,andtheyarecollaboratinginextendingandevolvingthesecapabilitiestomeetthedemandsofnewdatatypesandresearchmethodsthroughthe2020s.Dataproductsshouldbereplicableandreproducible,rangingfrombasicobservationdatatohigh-levelaggregateddataandcatalogs.

3Theforumforthedevelopmentoftheinteroperabilitystandardsusedbymajorastronomydatacenters(http://www.ivoa.net)

18

(3) Ensurethatdatacentersengageinthedevelopmentandrefinementofinteroperabilitystandards,viathewell-establishedprocessesoftheIVOA,andworkwithgroupssuchasAstropy4to ensure support for these standards in present in community developed,opensourcesoftware.

(4) Ensurethatnewfacilitiesareadequatelysupported.Newfacilities(Sections3.1,3.2)willdemand a transformation in the way data are analyzed. The early phases of thistransformationarealreadyunderway(e.g.,theuseofPythonasanenvironment,cloudcomputing). But, resources must be made available for full development, which willdemand remote Science Platforms5 and Server-side analytics 6 , implementation ofcomplex fault-tolerant workflows, data mining and machine learning, and advancedvisualization.

(5) Fosterthedevelopmentofnextgenerationinteroperable,user-friendlyvisualinterfaces,data mining tools, the ability to construct and implement analysis workflows easily,bothviavisualizationandscripting,andtheability toworkwithdataboth locallyandremotely(current-generationwell-knowexamplesincludeTOPCAT,DS9andCSCView).

(6) Support interdisciplinary research in astrostatistics and astroinformatics and thetransfer of methods from the statistics, computer science, and machine learningcommunities,fordevelopmentandapplicationofinnovativedataanalysismethodsandalgorithms.

(7) Ensure that facilitiesandarchivesparticipate incurationeffortsand initiatives to linktogetherdatasets,relatedancillarydata(e.g.,atomicandmoleculardatabases),objects,andtheliterature.

Dataareanimportantlegacyofmajorastronomicalfacilities,andproperdatamaintenancewill insure that new sciencewill be produced for the future, even after the first crop ofscientific papers and discoveries have been published. Statistics of data usage from theNASA archives demonstrate that archival data is used for newpublished scientificworkseveraltimes(Fig.3).

4http://www.astropy.org/acknowledging.html5SeeLSSTSciencePlatformDesigndocumenthttps://ldm-542.lsst.io6NASABigDataTaskForce(https://science.nasa.gov/science-committee/subcommittees/big-data-task-force)

19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 190

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% Data Published as Function of Time in Archive

No Publications

1 Pubs 2 Pubs 3 Pubs 4+ Publications

Years

% D

ata

Ava

ila

ble

fo

r P

ub

lica

tio

n

Figure3.–PercentageofChandraexposuretimepublishedversusyearsinthearchive.ThescientificuseofarchivalChandradataisincreasingwithtimeinthepublicarchive.Forexample,19yearsfromlaunch,~75%oftheobservationhavebeenpublishedinmorethan4papers.AsimilartrendisobservedfortheHSTdata.

20

9.ConclusionsWeproposeexploration as the centralquestion for theDecadalCommittee’sdiscussions.Thehistoryof astronomy shows thatparadigm-changingdiscoverieswerenotdrivenbywell-formulated scientific questions, based on the knowledge of the time. They wereinstead the result of the increase in discovery space fostered by new telescopes andinstruments. An additional tool for increasing the discovery space is provided by theanalysis and mining of the increasingly larger amount of archival data available toastronomers. We urge the Decadal Committee to (1) keep multi-wavelength and multi-messenger exploration center stage in their deliberations of new facilities, includingconsideration for flexible and well-calibrated modes of operation that could fosteradaptationforusewithnewdiscoveryspace;and(2)recognizetheimportanceofdataandtheir stewardship, and computational services, as major elements of any new scientificdevelopment for the next decade.Revolutionary observing facilities, and the state-of-the-art astronomy archives needed to support these facilities, will open up theuniversetonewdiscovery.

21

References–Section1.Elliot,K.C.etal.2016,Bioscience,66(10),880.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862324/

Firestein,S.‘Ignorance:HowitDrivesScience’2012,OxfordUniv.Press

Harwit,M.1984,‘CosmicDiscovery:TheSearch,ScopeandHeritageofAstronomy’,TheMIT

Press

References–Section2.Abbott,B.P.etal.2017a,PhysRevLett.,118,1101.

Abbott,B.P.etal.2017b,PhysRevLett.,119,1101.

Chime/FRBCollaboration,2019,Nature,566,230;235.

Coulteretal.2017,Science,358,1556

Done,C.,&Gierlinski,M.,2003,MNRAS,342,1041.

Fabbiano,G.,2006,ARAA,44,325.

Fabbiano,G.,2019,arXiv: 1903.01970

Gold,T.,1968,Nature,218,731.

Grindlay,J.,Gursky,H.etal.1976,ApJL,205,L127.

Haggard,D.,etal.,2017,ApJ,848,L25.

Hewish,A.,Bell,S.J.,etal.,1968,Nature,217,709.

Jaroszynski,M.,2019,MNRAS,4843,1637.

Kasliwal,M.M.,etal.2017,Science,358,1559.

Klebesadel,R.W.,Strong,I.B.,andOlson,R.A.,1973,ApJ,182,L85.

Lewin,W.H.G.etal.1995,in‘X-rayBinaries’,Ed.W.H.G.Lewin,J.vanParadijs,E.P.J.van

denHeuvel,CombridgeUniversityPress,P.175.

McClintock,J.E.,andRemillard,R.A.,1986,ApJ,308,110.

Pringle,J.,andRees,M.J.,1972,A&A,21,1.

Vrtilek,S.D.&Boroson,B.S.2013,MNRAS,428,369.

Zhang,S.-B.etal.,2019,MNRAS

Zolotukhin,etal.,2017,ApJ,839,125.

References–Section3.Ackemann,M.etal.theFermi-LATcollaboration2014,Science345,554.Burrows,C.J.etal.1996,ApJ,473,437.Chaplin,W.J.&Miglio,A.2013,ARA&a,51,353.deLaverny,P.,Recio-Blanco,A.,Worley,C.C.,etal.2013,TheMessenger,153,18.

22

Davenport,J.R.A.&Covey,K.R.2018,ApJ868,151.Davenport,J.R.A.2019,AAS126.2.Gratton,R.G.;Carretta,E.;Bragaglia,A.2012,ARA&A,20,50.Jones,D.,Boffin,H.M.J.,2017,NatureAstronomy,1,117.Kastner,J.H.etal.2002,ApJ,567,434.McCaughrean,M.J.,O’Dell,C.R.1996,AJ,111,1977.Piotto,G.etal.2015,AJ,149,91.Prisinzano,L.etal.2008,ApJ,677,401.Rutledge,R.E.etal.2000,ApJ,538L,141.Tylenda,R.,Soaker,N.2006,A&A,451,223.Remillard,R.A.,McClintock,J.E.2006,ARA&A,44,49.Smith,N.etal.2016,MNRAS,458,950.Worley,C.C.,deLaverny,P.,Recio-Blanco,A.,etal.2012,A&A,542,A48.

.

References–Section4.Andrews,S.M.etal.2018,ApJ,869L,41.Balbus,S.A.&Hawley,J.F.1991ApJ,376,214.Fulton,B.J.&Petigura,E.A.2018,AJ,156,264.Konacki,M.&Wolszczan,A.2003,ApJ,591,L147.Mayor,M.&Queloz,D.1995,Nature,378,355.VanderMarel,N.etal.2019,arXiv190103680V.Wolszczan,A.,2000,etal.ApJ,540L,41.References–Section5.Bastian&Lardo,2018,ARA&A,56,83BBedinetal.2019,MNRAS,484L,54BCohenetal.2017,ApJ,849,150CDalcantonetal.2012.ApJS,200,18DDongetal.2014ApJ,785,136DGoodmanetal.2014,ApJ,797,53GLindegrenetal.2018,A&A,616A,2LPrice-Whelanetal.2018a,ApJ,867,5PPrice-Weelanetal.2018b,AJ,156,18PWeiszetal.2013,ApJ,762,123WReferences–Section6.Bolton,C.T.1972,NPhS,240,124.Bowler,R.A.A.,etal.2017,MNRAS,466,3612.

23

Capak,P.L.,etal.2011,Nature,470,233.Chilingarian,I.etal.2009Science3261379.Chilingarian,I.,Zolotukhin,I.2015,Science,348,418.Cooke,K.C.,etal.2018,ApJ,857,122.Fabbiano,G.etal2017,ApJ,842L,4.Lanzuisi,G.etal2018,MNRAS,480,2578.Lemaux,B.C.,etal.2018,A&A,615A,77.Madau,P.etal.1998,ApJ,498,106.Magorrian,J.,etal.1998,AJ,115,2285.Paggi,A.,etal.2014,ApJ,787,134.Pavesi,R.,etal.2018,ApJ,861,43.Pringle,J.E.,etal.1973A&A,29,179.Stefanon,M.,etal.2017,ApJ,851,43.Soifer,B.T.,etal.1984,ApJ,278L,71.Tacchella,S.etal.2015,Science,348,314.Trakhtenbrot,B.etal.2015,Science,349,168.References-Section7.Abbott,B.P.etal.,2017,PhysicalReviewLetters,118,22110.Bonamente,M.etal.,2006,ApJ,647,25.Bowler,R.A.A.,etal.2017,MNRAS,466,361.Cackett,E.M.etal.2007,MNRAS,380,669.Cao,S.etal.2015,ApJ,806,185.DeJaeger,T.etal.,2015,ApJ,815,121.Emami,R.etal.2019,arXic:1711.05210.Haas,M.etal.,2011,A&A,535,A73.Madelbaum,R.2018,ARA&A,56,393.Riess,A.G.etal.2018,ApJ,861,126.Risaliti,G.,Lusso,E.,2019,Nat.Astr.Tmp.195.Rubin,V.C.etal.1978,apJ,225,L107.Schaefer,B.E.2007,ApJ,660,16.Watson,D.etal.,ApJ,2011,740,L49.Zwicky,F.1933(EnglishtranslationbyH.AndernachinarXiv:1711.01693).