asymmetric olefin metathesis

86
Asymmetric Olefin Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis Metathesis October 4 th , 2004

Upload: donat

Post on 13-Jan-2016

168 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis. October 4 th , 2004. First proposed by Chauvin: Herrison, J. L.; Chauvin, Y. Makromol. Chem. 1970 , 141 , 161. and later expanded upon by Katz: Katz, T. J.; McGinnis, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1975 , 97 , 1592. Propaganda...?. Retrosynthesis…. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Asymmetric Olefin Asymmetric Olefin MetathesisMetathesis

October 4th, 2004

Page 2: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Ring Closing Metathesis Reactions : Mechanism

First proposed by Chauvin: Herrison, J. L.; Chauvin, Y. Makromol. Chem. 1970, 141, 161. and later expanded upon by Katz: Katz, T. J.; McGinnis, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1592.

Page 3: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Propaganda...?

Page 4: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Diels-Alder Cycloaddition

Ring-Closing Metathesis

Retrosynthesis…

Page 5: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Ring-Closing Metathesis

No Stereocenters Formed

R1

R2

R1

R2

Diels-Alder Cycloaddition

R1

R3

R2

R4

R7

R8

R6

R5

+

Formation of 4 Contiguous

StereocentersR2

R7

R6R4

R1

R3

R8

R5

Asymmetric Metathesis?

Page 6: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Outline.

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry

2. Typical Reactions of Asymmetric Metathesis.

3. First Asymmetric Metathesis by Grubbs and Fujimura.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity

6. General Conclusions and Future Outlook

Page 7: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

Schrock’s Catalyst.

Page 8: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

Syn:Anti Alkylidenes in Mo-Catalysts.

Syn - isomer is more stable because of an agostic interaction between the C-H bond of the alkylidene and the metal center.

Angle is approx. 180o because of donation of N lone pair into

a d-orbital of Mo.

Page 9: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

The Chemistry of Schrock’s Catalyst: Decomposition.

Catalyst is highly susceptible to intermolecular decomposition pathways.

Page 10: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

The Chemistry of Schrock’s Catalyst: Decomposition.

Bulky imido ligands function to limit intermolecular

decomposition of the catalyst

1. Alkoxide can vary greatly but must be large and bulky enough to

limit intermolecular decomposition.

2. Electron withdrawing alkoxides also influence the alkylidene geometry.

Page 11: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

The Chemistry of Schrock’s Catalyst: Polymerization.Polymerization (22 oC, PhMe) of NBDF6

Polymer with high

cis content (~ 95 %).

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

Page 12: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

The Chemistry of Schrock’s Catalyst: Polymerization.Polymerization (22 oC, PhMe) of NBDF6

Polymer with high

cis content (~ 95 %).

Polymer with high trans

content (~ 99 %).

Polymerization (22 oC, PhMe) of NBDF6

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

Page 13: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

Syn:Anti Alkylidenes in Mo-Catalysts.

Syn - isomer is more stable because of an agostic interaction between the C-H bond of the alkylidene and the metal center.

Electron withdrawing groups strengthen the pseudo-triple

bond between the imido ligand and the metal center.

Page 14: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

Syn:Anti Alkylidenes in Mo-Catalysts.

Syn - isomer is more stable because of an agostic interaction between the C-H bond of the alkylidene and the metal center.

Electron withdrawing groups strengthen the pseudo-triple

bond between the imido ligand and the metal center.

In turn, this hinders rotation about the alkylidene.

Consequently, the anti-isomer is estimated to be 105 times more reactive towards NBDF6 than the syn-isomer.

Page 15: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

The Chemistry of Schrock’s Catalyst: Polymerization.

Polymerization (22 oC, PhMe) of NBDF6

Polymer with high

cis content (~ 95 %).

Polymer with high trans

content (~ 99 %).

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

Electron withdrawing groups (including phenols) slow rotation enough that syn-isomer is the only one available for reaction!

Electron rich groups (alkyls) speed up rotation enough to compete with polymerization, hence the anti is the reacting isomer!

Page 16: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

Alkylidene Geometry is Essential for Asymmetric Induction.

Approach from the re

face

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

Approach from the si

face

Page 17: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

Alkylidene Geometry is Essential for Asymmetric Induction.

Approach from the re

face

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

Approach from the si

face

Approach from the re

face

Let’s imagine that in a chiral environment, attack from the

front face is favoured.

Page 18: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

Alkylidene Geometry is Essential for Asymmetric Induction.

Approach from the re

face

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

Let’s imagine that in a chiral environment, attack from the

front face is favoured.

The result would be a racemic product!

Approach from the si

face

Approach from the si

face

Approach from the re

face

Page 19: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

What’s The Point?

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

‘ Catalysts such as [these] could selectively polymerize or ring-close one enantiomer in a racemic mixture.’

Last line…

Page 20: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

1. Development of Metathesis Catalysts and the Jump to Asymmetry.

What’s The Point?

McConville, D. H.; Wolf, J. R.; Schrock, R.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4413 – 4414.

Grubbs and Fu demonstrate first RCM of nitrogen containing rings using Schrock’s catalyst…

‘ Catalysts such as [these] could selectively polymerize or ring-close one enantiomer in a racemic mixture.’

Last line…

Fu, G. C.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7324-5.

Historically Speaking…

Page 21: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

3. First Asymmetric Metathesis by Grubbs and Fujimura.

Grubbs’ Catalysts.

Grubbs’ 1st Generation Catalyst

Grubbs’ 2nd

Generation Catalyst

Page 22: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

2. Typical Reactions of Asymmetric Metathesis.

A. Kinetic Resolution.

Page 23: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

3. First Asymmetric Metathesis by Grubbs and Fujimura.

Grubbs’ First Attempt...

Fujimura, O.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2499.

2.0 mol %, 0 oC or 20 oC, 20 min., toluene

22 % ee 26 % ee

26 % ee 15 % ee

For di-substituted olefins, no kinetic resolution was observed due to faster ring closing versus

tri-substituted olefins.

Page 24: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

3. First Asymmetric Metathesis by Grubbs and Fujimura.

Grubbs’ First Attempt...

Fujimura, O.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2499.

2.0 mol %, 0 oC or 20 oC, 20 min., toluene

22 % ee 26 % ee

26 % ee 15 % ee

For di-substituted olefins, no kinetic resolution was observed due to faster ring closing versus

tri-substituted olefins.

R

S

Page 25: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

3. First Asymmetric Metathesis by Grubbs and Fujimura.

Proposed Reaction Models.

R - enantiomer favoured for 5-membered rings.

S - enantiomer favoured for 6-membered rings.

Page 26: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Langemann and Furstner demonstrate first macrocyclic RCM using Ru-based catalysts…

Historically Speaking…

3. First Asymmetric Metathesis by Grubbs and Fujimura.

Grubbs’ First Attempt...

2.0 mol %, 0 oC or 20 oC, 20 min., toluene

22 % ee 26 % ee

Langemann, K.; Furstner, A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3942.

Fujimura, O.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2499.

Page 27: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

3. First Asymmetric Metathesis by Grubbs and Fujimura.

Grubbs’ Second Attempt...

Fujimura, O.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 824-832.

Change in ligand structure led to a decrease in the efficiency of the kinetic

resolution.

First example of a desymmetrization of trienes.

Page 28: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

2. Typical Reactions of Asymmetric Metathesis.

C. Desymmetrization of Trienes.

Page 29: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts.

Grubbs-Hoveyda Catalyst

Page 30: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts.

Page 31: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts.

Good selectivity for 5-membered rings. Highly substrate dependent.

Page 32: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts.

Good selectivity for 5-membered rings. Highly substrate dependent.

6-Membered rings are still a problem.

Alexander, J. B.; La, D. S.; Cefalo, D. R.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4041-4042.

Page 33: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Desymmetrization of Trienes.

Some good selectivities but…

…substituted olefins still necessary.

La, D. S.; Alexander, J. B.; Cefalo, D. R.; Graf, D. D.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9720-9721.

Page 34: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Tandem AROM/RCM.

Some good selectivities.

Weatherhead, G. S.; Ford, J. G.; Alexanian, E. J.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1828-1829.

Page 35: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

2. Typical Reactions of Asymmetric Metathesis.

B. AROM/CM (Asymmetric Ring-Opening Metathesis/Cross Metathesis).

Page 36: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

B. AROM/CM (Asymmetric Ring-Opening Metathesis/Cross Metathesis).

2. Typical Reactions of Asymmetric Metathesis.

Page 37: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

La, D. S.; Sattely, E. S.; Ford, J. G.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7767-7778.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: AROM/RCM Towards Cyclopentenes.

Some good selectivities…

Page 38: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

2. Typical Reactions of Asymmetric Metathesis.

B. AROM/CM (Asymmetric Ring-Opening Metathesis/Cross Metathesis).

Page 39: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

La, D. S.; Sattely, E. S.; Ford, J. G.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7767-7778.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: AROM/RCM Towards Cyclopentenes.

Some good selectivities…

...but some unexplained failures as well

...only styrene used as olefin, and…

Page 40: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Mo-Catalysts in AROM/RCM: Olefins Other Than Styrene.

Weatherhead, G. S.; Ford, J. G.; Alexanian, E. J.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1828-1829.

Page 41: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: Cyclic Amines and Medium Rings.

Some good selectivities.

Dolman, S. J.; Sattely, E. S.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6991-6997.

...but unsubstituted olefins still a problem.

Page 42: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Kiely A. F.; Jernelius J. A.; Schrock R. R.; Hoveyda A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2868-9.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: Synthesis of Tertiary Ethers and Medium Rings.

Page 43: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Desymmetrization of Trienes and an Application to Natural Product Synthesis

Burke, S. D.; Mueller, N.; Beaudry, C. M. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1827-1829.

55 – 59 % ee

Page 44: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Imido Ligand Modification.

Weatherhead, G. S.; Houser, J. H.; Ford, J. G.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9553-9559.

Page 45: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Ligand Modification.

Interestingly, the previous developed catalyst still exhibits significantly better selectivity in reactions forming 5-membered rings.

High ee’s observed for forming 6-membered

rings by kinetic resolution and...

… in desymmetrization of trienes.

Zhu, S. S.; Cefalo, D. R.; La, D. S.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Davis, W. M.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8251-8259.

Page 46: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: RCM of Boronates.

Jernelius, J. A.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 7345 – 7351.

Example that compares asymmeric metathesis to the Noyori asymmetric reduction of -ketoesters.

Page 47: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: Desymmetrization of Dienes via Inter-molecular CM.

Jernelius, J. A.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 7345 – 7351.

Page 48: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Cefalo, D. R.; Kiely, A. F.; Wuchrer, M.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Schrock, R.

R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3139-3140.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Ligand Modification.

Page 49: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: Cyclic Secondary Amines.

Dolman, S. J.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4899-4902.  

Important compounds for medicinal chemistry.

Sterically more accessible nitrogen can deactivate catalysts through binding.

NH bonds cleave Mo-O bonds of chiral ligands through protonation.

Page 50: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Mo-Catalysts: Cyclic Secondary Amines.

Dolman, S. J.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4899-4902.  

Authors do not describe WHY these particular catalysts solve the problems

associated with secondary amines?

Puzzling substrate dependence??

Page 51: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Teng, X.; Cefalo, D. R.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10779-10784. For crystal structures of THF adducts see:

Schrock, R. R.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Dolman, S. J.; Miller, S. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Hoveyda, A. H. Organometallics 2002, 21, 409-417.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: The THF Effect?

THF only binds to syn-alkylidenes at reaction temperatures and Et2O is ineffective as an additive.

Less Lewis-acidic catalysts do not exhibit the THF effect, meaning it is unique to these catalysts.

Page 52: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Teng, X.; Cefalo, D. R.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10779-10784. For crystal structures of THF adducts see:

Schrock, R. R.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Dolman, S. J.; Miller, S. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Hoveyda, A. H. Organometallics 2002, 21, 409-417.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: The THF Effect?

Adding 2,5-Dimethyl-THF in place of THF slows the reaction AND lowers the ee of the product!

(10 eq., < 10 % conv. @ 24 h, 27 % ee.)

Hoveyda et al. theorize that bulky 2,5-dimethyl-THF may inhibit substrate bonding but they cannot prove it

and cannot explain the drop in selectivity.

THF only binds to syn-alkylidenes at reaction temperatures and Et2O is ineffective as an additive.

Less Lewis-acidic catalysts do not exhibit the THF effect, meaning it is unique to these catalysts.

Page 53: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Teng, X.; Cefalo, D. R.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10779-10784. For crystal structures of THF adducts see:

Schrock, R. R.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Dolman, S. J.; Miller, S. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Hoveyda, A. H. Organometallics 2002, 21, 409-417.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: The THF Effect?

BE WARNED! Adding THF does not always lead to an increase in enantioselectivity. The THF effect is NOT general and should be screened on a case by case basis.

Page 54: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Tsang, W. C. P.; Jernelius, J. A.; Cortez, G. A.; Weatherhead, G. S.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2591-2596.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Adamantyl-Mo Catalysts.

Catalyst is solvent free and THF does not bind to the catalyst above -60 oC.

No anti-alkylidene signals are observed in the presence of electron donating ligands (eg. THF) that are normally observed (albeit minimumly) for arylimido complexes. Hoveyda and

co-workers claim that the smaller adamantyl unit is farther away from the alkylidene and this causes the Lewis acidity of the metal to decrease.

Identical functional group tolerance as previous catalysts.

In contrast to arylimido catalysts…..

Page 55: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Tsang, W. C. P.; Jernelius, J. A.; Cortez, G. A.; Weatherhead, G. S.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem.

Soc. 2003, 125, 2591-2596.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Adamantyl-Mo Catalysts.

Arylimido catalysts deliver low yields, low selectivities (ee’s and cis/trans ratios) and significant levels of by-products.

Page 56: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Tsang, W. C. P.; Jernelius, J. A.; Cortez, G. A.; Weatherhead, G. S.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem.

Soc. 2003, 125, 2591-2596.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Adamantyl-Mo Catalysts.

Arylimido catalysts deliver low yields, low selectivities (ee’s and cis/trans ratios) and significant levels of by-products.

Arylimido catalysts deliver the meso-15 as the predominant product.

Page 57: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: User Friendly Synthesis.

The Mo precursor is stable to air and moisture and is commercially available from Strem Chemicals. The Postassium salt can be generated in-situ and added to the Mo species.

The resulting THF solution is stable for weeks.

Aeilts, S. L.; Cefalo, D. R.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Houser, J. H.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. Angew. Chem. 2001, 40, 1452-1456.

Page 58: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: User Friendly Synthesis.

‘Original’ catalyst still gives higher selctivities in some cases.

For more information of the alteration of chiral backbone see: (a) Tsang, W. C. P.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Organometallics 2001, 20, 5658-5669. (b) Hultzsch, K. C.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Jernelius, J.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Organometallics 2001, 20, 4705-4712.

Page 59: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Hultzsch, K. C.; Jernelius, J. A.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. Angew. Chem. 2002, 41, 589-593.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: First Polymer Supported Variant.

Page 60: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Hultzsch, K. C.; Jernelius, J. A.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. Angew. Chem. 2002, 41, 589-593.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: First Polymer Supported Variant.

After 3 cycles catalysts showed consistent ee’s, good conversions and less than 5 % of Mo was found contaminating crude product mixtures (compared to greater

than 15 % for free catalyst.

Colour difference for free catalyst reactions (left) and polymer supported variants (right).

Page 61: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Dolman, S. J.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Pezet, F.; Teng, X.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, ASAP.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Polystyrene Supported Variant.

Page 62: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Polystyrene Supported Variant.

Dolman, S. J.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Pezet, F.; Teng, X.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, ASAP.

Page 63: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Dolman, S. J.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Pezet, F.; Teng, X.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, ASAP.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Crossed-Linked Norbornene Derived Polymer Support.

Page 64: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Less 1% of Mo-quantity used remains in crude product.

Dolman, S. J.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Pezet, F.; Teng, X.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, ASAP.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Chiral Biphen-Mo Catalysts: Polystyrene Supported Variant.

Page 65: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Tsang, W. C. P.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Alexander, J. B.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2652-

2666.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Is W-Catalyzed (Asymmetric) Metathesis Possible?

THF does not bind strongly but complex normally isolated as a THF adduct. THF freely disassoiates at rt

in solution.

Syn-alkylidene still favoured.

Good selectivity reported, especially

with 6-membered rings!

In general higher reaction

temp’s are needed.

Page 66: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Tsang, W. C. P.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Alexander, J. B.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2652-

2666.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Is W-Catalyzed (Asymmetric) Metathesis Possible?

1H NMR captured the generation (in the presence of ethylene) of various metallocyclobutanes intermediates. These tungstacyclobutanes are the resting

states of the catalyst.

Initial metallocycle the least stable due to the combined steric repulsion of the -substituents.

The product-W complex is stable up to 90 oC.

Page 67: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Tsang, W. C. P.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Alexander, J. B.; Bonitatebus, P. J., Jr.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2652-

2666.

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Is W-Catalyzed (Asymmetric) Metathesis Possible?

Metathesis is possible, but the higher temperatures needed are to expel

ethylene and restart the catalytic cycle.

1H NMR captured the generation (in the presence of ethylene) of various metallocyclobutanes intermediates. These tungstacyclobutanes are the resting

states of the catalyst.

Initial metallocycle the least stable due to the combined steric repulsion of the -substituents.

The product-W complex is stable up to 90 oC.

Page 68: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

4. Mo- (and W-) based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

General Comments on Mo-Catalysts.

1. Can be quite effective for a number of transformations but it seems best to screen a number of catalysts.

2. Reactions normally carried out in C6H6 at 21 oC or around 50 oC in some rare cases.

3. Several pre-catalysts are available from Strem.

4. Substrate scope and functional group tolerance are similar to those of Schrock’s achiral catalyst.

5. Typically require rigorous exclusion of air and moisture (H2O and O2).

6. Generally good for 5-membered ring formation although some catalysts have been developed for six membered rings. Some new catalysts show potential

for activity that bridges both substrate classes.

7. Ligands influence stereoselectivity as well and alkylidene geometry.

8. The THF effect is variable and should be screened for as well.

Page 69: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

First Ru-based Chiral Catalyst.

Generally poor enantioselectivities.

NaI additive increases

enantioselectivity ?

Seiders, T. J.; Ward, D. W.; Grubbs, R H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3225-3228.

Page 70: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

First Ru-based Chiral Catalyst: Explaining the Stereoselectivity.

Seiders, T. J.; Ward, D. W.; Grubbs, R H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3225-3228.

Page 71: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

First Ru-based Chiral Catalyst.

Historically Speaking…Sanford, M. S.; Love, J. A.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6543-6554.

Grubbs and co-workers elucidate the mechanism of Ru-catalysed olefin metathesis.

Seiders, T. J.; Ward, D. W.; Grubbs, R H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3225-3228.

Page 72: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Costabile, C.; Cavallo, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,126, 9592-9600.  

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Ru-Catalysts: Origin of Stereoselectivity in Kinetic Resolutions.

B is approx. 20 kcal/mol higher in energy than A. C could not be modeled and always coverged to either A or B.

The authors then replaced the Cl ions by I in order to mimic the experimental results reported by Grubbs. The substrate selected was…

Page 73: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Costabile, C.; Cavallo, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,126, 9592-9600.  

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

First Ru-based Chiral Catalyst: Origin of Stereoselectivity in Kinetic Resolutions.

2A-6E-si is preferred (lower in energy) by 6 kcal/mol

NOTE: There is no relationship between olefin enantioface and configuartion of the products because no prochiral center has been

included in the substrate.

Page 74: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Costabile, C.; Cavallo, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,126, 9592-9600.  

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

First Ru-based Chiral Catalyst: Origin of Stereoselectivity in Kinetic Resolutions.

Try placing the Me group in an equatorial position- does this change the preference for the si-face? No! 2A-7E-si-Seq is preferred (lower in energy) by 10 kcal/mol

This makes sense since this catalyst has shown experimentally to favour the S enantiomer in kinetic resolutions.

Page 75: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Costabile, C.; Cavallo, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,126, 9592-9600.  

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

First Ru-based Chiral Catalyst: Origin of Stereoselectivity in Kinetic Resolutions.

Try placing the Me group in an equatorial position- does this change the preference for the si-face? No! 2A-7E-si-Seq is preferred (lower in energy) by 10 kcal/mol

This makes sense since this catalyst has shown experimentally to favour the S enantiomer in kinetic resolutions.

All other transition states modelled that either a) had the Me in an axial position or b) would lead to the S product were on average 25 kcal/mol higher in energy.

Heavier halogens decrease the size of the reaction pocket leading to a more selective metathesis.

Page 76: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Recyclable Chiral Ru Catalysts: AROM/CM in Air.

Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4954-4955.

Page 77: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Recyclable Chiral Ru Catalysts: AROM/CM in Air.

Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Gillingham, D. G.; Garber, S. B.; Kataoka, O.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12502-12508.  

Facile modification of alkylidene units reported however, modification of the N-heterocyclic carbene is much more

cumbersome.

Page 78: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Recyclable Chiral Ru Catalysts: Steric Modification.

Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Gillingham, D. G.; Garber, S. B.; Kataoka, O.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12502-12508.  

Facile modification of alkylidene units reported however, modification of the N-heterocyclic carbene is much more

cumbersome.

Large difference in reactivity observed between 3d and 3.

Page 79: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Recyclable Chiral Ru Catalysts: Steric Modification.

Suffers from the difficulty associated with functionalized NOBIN derivatives (lengthy synthesis).

Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Gillingham, D. G.; Garber, S. B.; Kataoka, O.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12502-12508.  For more examples of the use of these bidentate carbene ligands see: Larsen, A. O.; Leu, W.; Oberhuber, C. N.; Campbell, J. E.; Hoveyda,

A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, ASAP.

Page 80: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

New Catalysts Afford Increased Activity!

Conversion still mediocre, but ee’s range from modest to very good in

some cases

Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Gillingham, D. G.; Garber, S. B.; Kataoka, O.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12502-12508.  

The bigger question is: What is the source of the increased activity between 3 and 3d???

Page 81: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

New Catalysts Afford Increased Activity!

The extra phenyl group pushes the iso-propyl group towards the carbene center. Hoveyda and co-workers have proposed that this is responsible for the increased rates of initiation of

the catalyst and hence the greater reactivity.

Page 82: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

New Catalysts Afford Increased Activity!

Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Gillingham, D. G.; Garber, S. B.; Kataoka, O.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12502-12508.  

Page 83: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

Other Application of Bi-Dentate Heterocyclic Ligands

Larsen, A. O.; Leu, W.; Oberhuber, C. N.; Campbell, J. E.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11130-11131.

Page 84: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

Gillingham, D. G.; Kataoka, O.; Garber, S. B.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12288-12290.

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

New Catalysts With Pendant Iodines

Page 85: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

5. Ru-based Catalysts: Scope and Reactivity.

New Catalysts With Pendant Iodines

These examples are representative. Hoveyda and co-workers increase reaction rates by performing reactions

in the absence of solvent.

Application in the preparation of

pyrans.

Page 86: Asymmetric Olefin Metathesis

6. General Conclusions and Future Outlook.

What Does the Future Hold?

1. Despite the obvious practical drawbacks to Mo versus Ru- at this point in time Mo-catalysts have been further developed. Ru-catalysis will definitely be a target for the future…

2. Need to see more applications of ARCM in (total) synthesis…

3. Need better catalysts- in terms of activity and selectivity and with respect substrate dependence and breadth of reactions…

4. Must find better way of optimizing the ligand structure- particularly for Ru catalysts…

5. Are there new applications and reactions for these catalysts?