ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7....

81
A tale of two networks – network neutrality and other topics Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University Any opinions are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Columbia University or the Federal CommunicaAons Commission.

Upload: others

Post on 14-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

A  tale  of  two  networks  –  network  neutrality  and  other  topics  

Henning  Schulzrinne  Columbia  University  

Any  opinions  are  those  of  the  author  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  Columbia  University  or  the  Federal  CommunicaAons  Commission.  

Page 2: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  typical  Internet  keynote  

•  Unlimited,  symmetric  bandwidth  for  everyone  –  with  LTE,  even  mobile  

•  GeIng  cheaper  every  year  –  with  robust  compeAAon  at  all  layers  

•  Everyone  uses  the  Internet  •  Millions  of  apps  produced  by  thousands  of  companies  •  The  big  jukebox  in  the  sky  •  A  single  Internet  for  all  applicaAons  

–  applicaAon-­‐neutral  •  IPv6  everywhere  (next  year)  

Page 3: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

But…  

•  Not  necessarily  wrong  •  but  not  guaranteed,  either  •  Non-­‐technology  forces  

– compeAAon  and  market  concentraAon  –  limited  financial  resources  – spectrum  shortages  

Page 4: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Internet  2020:  The  pessimists  version  

•  10  Mb/s  typical  Internet  connecAvity  –  good  enough  for  Facebook  –  asymmetric  

•  All  Internet  access  metered  –  mobile  &  landline  –  with  applicaAon-­‐specific  pricing  and  terminaAon  charges  –  price  stagnaAon  at  fixed  bandwidth  

•  Unregulated  monopoly  or  near-­‐monopoly  –  integrated  content  producAon  (L8?)  through  PHY  

•  Video  mostly  through  cable  company,  just  over  IP  •  IPv4  with  mulAple  layers  of  NATs  (“CGN”)  •  VoIP  by  ISP  

Page 5: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Time  of  transiAon  

Page 6: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Time  of  transiAon  

Old   New  

IPv4   IPv6  

circuit-­‐switched  voice   VoIP  

separate  mobile  voice  &  data   LTE  +  LTE-­‐VoIP  

911,  112   NG911,  NG112  

digital  cable  (QAM)   IPTV  

analog  &  digital  radio   Pandora,  Internet  radio,  satellite  radio  

credit  cards,  keys   NFC  

end  system,  peers   client-­‐server  v2  aka  cloud  

all  the  energy  into  transiAon  à  lifle  new  technology  

Page 7: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Household  spending  on  telecom  

U.S. TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE & SATELLITE: THE POVERTY PROBLEM 21

This is an extraordinary outcome. For more than a decade, real growth in the telecommunications category, despite the most audacious innovation in perhaps any category of our economy, was stifled by a combination of flat real incomes and the stagnation in previously debt-funded increases in consumer expenditures. In the early part of the decade, until the recession, rising incomes were enough to offset declines in the percentage of income allocated to the telecom category and keep the TelCos growing. During the recession, when incomes began to recede, the TelCos posted negative organic growth rates (even in nominal terms).

More recently, in 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, during what is likely the steepest part of the adoption curve for smartphones and data plans, organic growth in telecom has been narrowly positive. But even now, it is significantly below GDP growth rates.

Exhibit 17 Telecom Services as a Percentage of Ex-Necessities Personal Disposable Income

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The relative tranquility of a flat top line for real telecom consumption in the last few years belies enormous churn below the surface. Wireless and Internet access services were booming, just as one would expect. But local and long-distance services, which started the decade as by far the sectors' largest sub-categories, precipitously declined (see Exhibit 18).

Even within the wireless sub-category, there has been turmoil. Wireless data is growing rapidly, but wireless voice is now in decline. And lower-end customers are trading down just as quickly as more affluent customers are trading up. The fastest-growing segment of the wireless market in the United States as this Blackbook goes to press is not smartphonesTit is government-subsidized wireless service for the poor.

All this illustrates the conundrum: Telecommunications has not grown as a category V instead, its new services have simply displaced its old ones.

2.8%

2.8% 2.9%

2.8%

2.8%

2.8% 2.8% 2.9% 3.0% 3.1%

3.1% 3.

2% 3.4%

3.4% 3.

6% 3.8% 3.

9%

3.8%

3.8%

3.7% 3.8%

3.8% 3.8%

3.8%

3.8%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Tele

com

Ser

vice

s an

d In

tern

et A

cces

s (%

of

Ex-N

eces

sitie

s Pe

rson

al D

ispo

sabl

e In

com

e)

Note: Necessities include food, housing, transportation, energy and healthcare.

à  new  services  must  displace  old  services  

Page 8: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Wireless  +  Internet  replace  voice  

22 U.S. TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE & SATELLITE: THE POVERTY PROBLEM

Exhibit 18 Individual Telecom Services as a Percentage of Ex-Necessities Personal Disposable Income

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The data from the cable and satellite category is troubling for precisely the opposite reason. It has been growing > arguably, unsustainably so.

From a position 25 years ago where cable and satellite spending accounted for only about half a percent of non-necessities spending, cable and satellite spending has grown almost three times faster than other non-necessities expenditures, swelling to account for 1.4% of all discretionary spending (see Exhibit 19).

This growth has been almost entirely unimpeded by the recession. And bear in mind that this does not include cable-provided Internet access, which, as we saw previously, has also grown dramatically over the past decade. It also excludes cable phone service, which was also included in the previous (telecom) category.

Recall that such growth comes at a time when incomes are falling, savings rates are rising, and necessities are crowding out discretionary purchases. Where, exactly, will the money come from to support continued growth?

To be sure, telecom and pay TV do not exist in a vacuum. Other categories can and will be squeezed out to free up spending on services that are perceived to be higher utility (like wireless), or to preserve access to services like pay TV that are becoming more expensive.

Some of the growth in pay TV spending has already been funded by adjacent categories. Video media rentals, for example, have declined as a percentage of consumer spending for the past 15 years (see Exhibit 20), as have newspaper and periodical subscriptions, which are typically said to have been displaced by "free" services over the Internet, but which also could be argued to have been displaced by spending on alternative forms of information and entertainment.

Up to now, this kind of displacement has freed up headroom for cable and satellite to continue its relentless expansion as a percentage of consumer spending. From the perspective of the operators, and the equity markets, the rising allocation of income to pay TV paints a markedly better picture than the TelCos'.

Wireline

Wireless

Internet

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Indi

vidu

al T

elec

om S

ervi

ces

(% o

fEx

-Nec

essi

ties

Pers

onal

Dis

posa

ble

Inco

me)

Pay TV Pricing Power: A Blessing or a Curse?

Page 9: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

ResidenAal  broadband  penetraAon  (US)  

U.S. TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE & SATELLITE: THE POVERTY PROBLEM 49

Broadband: Connecting the Quintiles

Broadband access is as often characterized as a right as it is a privilege.

Broadband is already taken for granted by the affluent. For the higher-income

quintiles, there is a nearly unquenchable thirst for higher speeds. Cable is

dominating market share, and DSL is rapidly fading to irrelevance.

But the story is very different among the lower-income quintiles: More than

one-third of the country is unconnected, with the primary impediment being

affordability. While the top end of the country's income distribution is upgrading to

higher and higher speeds H and higher and higher prices H the low end stays on

the sidelines. There are other impediments beyond cost, including literacy and PC

ownership, to name two. But higher penetration of broadband among the bottom

two quintiles will eventually require lower prices, potentially including usage-

based pricing plans.

A strong case can be made that broadband penetration will eventually rise to the

ubiquity levels of electricity or running water. In fact, we have argued precisely

that for nearly 10 years in our research on the broadband market.

But it doesn't look like we'll get there any time soon. U.S. broadband

penetration as a whole stands at ~64% of households (as of the end of 2010; see

Exhibit 68). Penetration slowed sharply in the past two years. In 2010, the number

of new broadband subscribers in the United States grew more slowly than any year

in the past decade, on both a percentage and nominal basis (see Exhibit 69).

Exhibit 68 Residential Broadband Penetration Exhibit 69 Residential Broadband Net Adds

Source: Kagan, corporate reports and Bernstein estimates and analysis. Source: Kagan, corporate reports and Bernstein estimates and analysis.

Optimistically, the slowdown is merely a symptom of the severe economic

downturn, and a rebound will ensue with the recovery. To be sure, there are still

good reasons to believe that broadband penetration will expand over time H likely

to more than 70% over the next couple of years (or an incremental ~9.5 million

subscribers) H tracking demographic trends (that is, higher penetration among the

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%20

00

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Res

iden

tial B

road

band

Pen

etra

tion

(%)

1.6

1.8 2.5

3.7

4.5

4.5

2.9

0.4

(0.1

)

(0.7

)

0.2 0.5

1.1

1.8

1.8

1.0

3.3 4.

3 4.9

4.5 4.

4

3.5 6.

8

3.6

2.5

2.5

-10%

10%

30%

50%

70%

90%

110%

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Indu

stry

Gro

wth

Res

iden

tial B

road

band

Net

Add

ition

s (m

illio

n)

DSLFiberCableIndustry Growth

Note: Fiber net adds shown net of DSL losses.

A Tale of Two Broadbands

Broadband Penetration Gains Are Hitting a Wall

Page 10: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

US  broadband  speeds  

FCC  OBI  Report  #4  

Page 11: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

ResidenAal  broadband  

13

Chart 10Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2005-2009

(Shares of selected technologies)

aDSL Cable Modem FTTP All Other Fixed

58.5

39.5

55.9

40.9

54.5

2.6

40.8

56.0

3.9

38.3

56.0

5.1

37.0

57.0

40.5

55.0

41.2

54.6

3.2

39.9

56.0

4.7

37.7

Perc

enta

ge o

f Res

iden

tial F

ixed

Con

nect

ions

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Dec2005

Jun2006

Dec2006

Jun2007

Dec2007

Jun2008

Dec2008

Jun2009

Dec2009

Con

nect

ions

in T

hous

ands

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

Dec 2005 toDec 2006

Dec 2006 toDec 2007

Dec 2007 toDec 2008

Dec 2008 toDec 2009

Chart 11Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2005-2009

(Net adds for selected technologies)

aDSL Cable Modem FTTP

5,398

3,707

12901

5,404

4,223

3,361

2,745

551919 1,035 1,037

U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 27

FCC:  Internet  Access  Services  Status  as  of  December  31,  2009      

Page 12: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

ResidenAal  broadband  technologies  

14

Chart 12Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of December 31, 2009

(Shares of selected technologies for selected speeds, connections in thousands)

aDSL Cable Modem FTTP All Other Fixed

37.0

56.0

5.11.8

34.2

59.5

5.5

19.2

73.3

7.2

15.2

75.0

9.6

70.5

28.7

67.7

32.1

Est

imat

ed P

erce

ntag

e of

Hou

seho

lds

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Over 200 kbps in atleast one direction

At least 768 kbpsdownstream and over200 kbps upstream

At least 3 mbpsdownstream and over200 kbps upstream

At least 3 mbpsdownstream and at least

768 kbps upstream

At least 6 mbpsdownstream and at least

1.5 mbps upstream

At least 10 mbpsdownstream and at least

1.5 mbps upstream

Connections 73,950 67,338 50,123 37,149 11,007 9,806

U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 28

FCC:  Internet  Access  Services  Status  as  of  December  31,  2009      

Page 13: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

ResidenAal  Internet  access  2020  

FTTH  

DOCSIS  3.0  

DSL  

satellite,  LTE  &  modem  

10-­‐15%  (coastal,  high  income)  

60%  (suburbia)  

<  50  Mb/s*  

20  Mb/s  

3  Mb/s  15%  (semi-­‐rural)  

5%  (rural)  

FiOS  build  out  mostly  

done  

*  typical  residenAal  speed  offer  

Page 14: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Network  traffic  

Page 15: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Traffic  distribuAon  

Page 16: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Traffic  forecast  2015  

Exabytes/month   Consumer  (incl.  university,  Internet  cafés)  

Business  &  gov’t.   Total  

Internet   53.3   6.1   59.4  

Managed  IP  (corporate  WAN,  IP  VoD,  IPTV)  

11.8   3.0   14.8  

Mobile  data   4.9   1.3   6.3  

Total   70.0   10.4   80.5  

Page 17: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Monthly  ConsumpAon  

•  top  1%  à    –  49.7%  of  upstream  traffic  –  25%  of  downstream  traffic  

North  America  

Mean   Median   Mean  :  Median  

Upstream   4.5  GB   600  MB   7.33  

Downstream   18.6  GB   6.0  GB   3.06  

Aggregate   23.0  GB   7.0  GB   3.28  

Europe   Mean   Median   Mean  :  Median  

Upstream   8.2  GB   1.2  GB   6.87  

Downstream   31.3  GB   12.7  GB   2.47  

Aggregate   39.6  GB   14.7  GB   2.69  

Page 18: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Video,  video  and  more  video  

Upstream   Downstream   Aggregate  

BitTorrent   52.01   Netlix   29.70%   Netlix   24.71%  

HTTP   8.31%   HTTP   18.36%   BitTorrent   17.23%  

Skype   3.81%   YouTube   11.04%   HTTP   17.18%  

Netlix   3.59%   BitTorrent   10.37%   YouTube   9.85%  

PPStream   2.92%   Flash  Video   4.88%   Flash  Video   3.62%  

MGCP   2.89%   iTunes   3.25%   iTunes   3.01%  

RTP   2.85%   RTMP   2.92%   RTMP   2.46%  

SSL   2.75%   Facebook   1.91%   Facebook   1.86%  

Gnutella   2.12%   SSL   1.43%   SSL   1.68%  

Facebook   2.00%   Hulu   1.09%   Skype   1.29%  

Top  10   83.25%   Top  10   84.95%   Top  10   82.89%  

Page 19: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Average  monthly  usage  

•  Average  monthly  TV  consumpAon  (US):  154  hours  

•  Netlix:  1  GB/hour  (SD)  …  2.3  GB/hour  (HD)  – à  300  GB/month  – more  if  people  in  household  watch  different  content  

monthly  usage   overage  cost  (AT&T  Uverse)  

2010   2012   2015  

>  50  GB   $0   9.4%   14.1%   21.5%  

>  100  GB   $0   5.3%   8.2%   15.3%  

>  200  GB   $10   1.4%   4.4%   8.8%  

>  500  GB   $50   0.4%   0.8%   2.6%  

>  1  TB   $150   0.0%   0.2%   0.7%  

Page 20: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Bandwidth  generaAons  

Page 21: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Industry  structure  

Page 22: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Which  Internet  are  you  connected  to?  

multicast QoS

IPv6 IPv4  PIA  

IPv4  DHCP  

IPv4  NAT  

port  80  +  25  

Page 23: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

2  Internet  futures  

content  and  applicaAons  

fiber  or  copper  loop  (“Homes  with  tails”)  

IP  

Google  

Chatroulef

e  Level  3  

RCN  

content  producAon  (*)  content  distribuAon  

CDN  broadband  access  local  infrastructure  regional  and  naAonal  

backbone    

vs.  

AT&T  Comcast/NBC  (*)  Verizon  

Page 24: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Scenario  1:  max.  compeAAon  

applicaAons  (Netlix,  Pandora,  your  blog)  

OS  (Windows  Server,  Linux,  MacOS)  

data  centers  (Equinix,  Amazon,  …)  

wide  area  network  (Qwest,  Sprint,  VZ,  

TeliaSonera,  NTT,  DTAG,    Level  3,  AT&T)  

web  browser  (Firefox,  IE,  Chrome,  …)  

OS  (Windows,  Android,  MacOS)  

system  platorm  (Intel,  ARM,  …)  

ISP  (compeAng)  

fiber,  radio  (regulated  monopoly)  

conduit  (public)  

content  &  applicaAon  providers   consumers  

Page 25: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Scenario  2:  verAcally  integrated  

classical  Internet  (web)  

interacAve  mulAmedia  (IMS)  

video  (live,  VOD)  

incumbent  operator  (e.g.,  AT&T,  Verizon)  cable  company  (someAmes)  

100  Mb/s  to  consumer  4  Mb/s    

small  operators  +  Google,  FB,  MSN  

Internet  

Page 26: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Network  economics  

•  Monopolies  –  economies  of  scale  (cost  ~  1/size)  –  “exists  when  a  specific  individual  or  an  enterprise  has  sufficient  control  over  a  parAcular  product  or  service  to  determine  significantly  the  terms  on  which  other  individuals  shall  have  access  to  it.”  (Wikipedia)  

•  Natural  monopoly  –  no  moAvaAon  for  second  provider  

•  road,  water,  gas,  electricity  –  Landline  telephone  &  broadband  – Wireless  

•  limited  spectrum  •  high  cost  of  entry  à  spectrum  aucAons  

26  

Page 27: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Why  are  monopolies  bad?  

•  Market  power  •  Pricing  power  

–  perfectly  compeAAve  market:  price  =  marginal  cost  •  Product  differenAaAon  

–  no  available  subsAtute  •  Excess  profits  •  Price  discriminaAon  

–  same  product,  different  prices  –  capture  consumer  surplus  

Page 28: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  monopoly  infrastructures  

•  Technical  structures  that  support  a  society  à  “civil  infrastructure”  –  Large  –  Constructed  over  generaAons  –  Not  o{en  replaced  as  a  whole  system  –  ConAnual  refurbishment  of  components  –  Interdependent  components  with  well-­‐defined  interfaces  –  High  iniAal  cost  

NID  2010  -­‐  Portsmouth,  NH  

water   energy   transportaAon  

Page 29: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

CompeAAon  (US)  

•  if  lucky,  incumbent  LEC  +  cable  company  – DSL:  cheaper,  but  low  speed  

•  mean:  2.5  –  3.5  Mb/s  –  FTTH  (FiOS):  only  3.3M  households  

•  10-­‐15  Mb/s  –  Cable:  >  $50/month,  higher  speeds  

•  8-­‐11  Mb/s  

•  o{en,  high  switching  costs  ($200  early  terminaAon  fee)  –  or  Aed  to  bundles  (TV,  mobile)  

Page 30: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

State  of  compeAAon  (US)  

U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 8

In Figure 3(b), we estimate the percentages of households in census tracts where providers reported

residential fixed-location connections of different speeds or operated a mobile wireless network capable

of sending or receiving data at the indicated speeds.

Figure 3(b)

Percentages of Households Located in Census Tracts Where Providers Report Residential Fixed-Location Connections of Various Speeds or Operate a Mobile Wireless Network

Capable of Delivering Service of Various Speeds as of December 31, 2009

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3+ Providers 58 40 3 2

2 Providers 35 40 22 20

1 Provider 6 17 56 58

0 Providers 1 3 18 21

At least 3 mbps

downstream & over 200

kbps upstream

At least 3 mbps

downstream & 768

kbps upstream

At least 6 mbps

downstream & 1.5

mbps upstream

At least 10 mbps

downstream & 1.5

mbps upstream

Figures may not sum to 100% due to rounding.FCC:  Internet  Access  Services  Status  as  of  December  31,  2009      

Page 31: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

April  2011   31  

Eyeball  ISPs:  2001  vs.  2010  

Comcast20%

AT&T17%

VZ15%

TW12%

Charter4%

Qwest4%

Cablevision4%

Centurylink3%

Windstream2%

Other18%Mediacom

1%

Page 32: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

April  2011   32  

Market  power:  eye  ball  vs.  transit  

Page 33: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Consumer  network  costs  

DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2010)2/FINAL

16

The minimum price for an entry-level broadband plan that includes any required line charges is given in Figure 7. The entry-level price for service ranges from USD 11 (PPP) in Sweden to USD 43 in Spain. It should be noted that the price for Spain is significantly higher than other countries for stand-alone broadband because all offers include a basic telephone service. This can be beneficial for customers wishing to purchase both services but also represents a higher entry-level price for consumers who would otherwise prefer to buy a stand-alone broadband access. The average entry-level (minimum) price for monthly broadband services is USD 22 (PPP).

Broadband subscription prices alone do not provide information about advertised speeds. This information can be captured in measurement of prices per advertised megabit per second. Lower-speed offers tend to have higher prices per advertised megabit. The price ranges per advertised megabit-per-second are provided in Figure 8. It is worth noting that the advertised speeds are not the actual speeds users will likely experience. There can be significant differences between the two.

Figure 8. Price ranges for stand-alone broadband connections per advertised megabit-per-second

October 2009, USD PPP

9.752.96

2.772.36

2.052.00

1.871.48

1.411.351.34

1.191.141.14

1.030.84

0.770.75

0.700.70

0.570.530.52

0.500.42

0.360.35

0.250.20

0.14

MXTR

BENO

IEUS

NZESLUITCA

GRUKDK

DENL

PLIS

ATAU

CZCHSK

HUFI

PTSE

FRKR

JP

94.6476.40

35.6825.28

49.2849.33

13.1556.52

25.086.35

66.9710.72

17.418.79

19.9613.33

183.3434.32

23.44168.33

9.6434.72

18.8812.41

77.0826.64

137.4949.27

4.9025.60

0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00

MexicoTurkey

BelgiumNorwayIreland

United StatesNew Zealand

SpainLuxembourg

ItalyCanadaGreece

United KingdomDenmarkGermany

NetherlandsPolandIcelandAustria

AustraliaCzech Republic

SwitzerlandSlovak Republic

HungaryFinland

PortugalSwedenFranceKoreaJapan

Mean Median

Note: The data reflect a snapshot of stand-alone broadband prices in October 2009 and includes associated line charges. The prices in the chart only include bundled offers when a stand-alone broadband service is not available from the provider. Broadband price data without required line charges is available on the OECD Broadband portal.

Page 34: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Remedies    

•  FuncAonal  separaAon  –  separate  enAAes  for  L2  and  upper  layers  –  e.g.,  “dry  loops”  copper  –  e.g.,  UK  (BT  Wholesale)  

•  MulAple  infrastructures  à  compeAAon  –  e.g.,  DSL,  cable,  wireless  –  but  subsAtutability?  – may  not  prevent  abuse  (e.g.,  Skype  blocking  for  French  mobile  operators)  

•  not  likely  to  protect  small  customer  groups  with  specialized  needs  

 

Page 35: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  future,  version  2:  postal  service  

•  Private  or  semi-­‐private  company  •  Tariffed  service  •  Based  on  weight  and  speed,  not  content  •  (Somewhat)  regulated  

– US  Postal  Rate  Commission  

 

35  

Page 36: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  future,  version  2:  airline  

•  Same  basic  service  (get  human  cargo  from  A  to  B)  •  but  vastly  different  prices  

–  economy  vs.  economy  first  vs.  first  class  –  revenue  management  –  restricAons  

•  flexibility  &  cancellaAon  risk  –  addiAonal  services  

•  Internet  version:  –  pay  extra  for  VPN  (see  iBahn  service)  –  consumer  web  sites  vs.  IMAP  access  –  except  only  1-­‐2  choices  

36  

Page 37: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Network  neutrality  

Page 38: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

What  is  network  neutrality?  

•  “The  principle  advocates  no  restricAons  by  Internet  service  providers  and  governments  on  content,  sites,  platorms,  the  kinds  of  equipment  that  may  be  afached,  and  the  modes  of  communicaAon.”  (Wikipedia)  

•  2005  FCC  statement:  –  “access  the  lawful  Internet  content  of  their  choice.  –  run  applicaAons  and  use  services  of  their  choice,  subject  to  the  needs  of  law  enforcement.  

–  connect  their  choice  of  legal  devices  that  do  not  harm  the  network.  

–  compeAAon  among  network  providers,  applicaAon  and  service  providers,  and  content  providers.”  

•  =  Any  lawful  content,  any  lawful  applicaAon,  any  lawful  device,  any  provider  

38  

Page 39: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Two  views  

Open  Internet  advocates  •  no  prioriAzaAon  •  flat  rates  •  all  networks  

Free  market  advocates  •  no  real  problem  •  allow  any  business  arrangement  •  “it’s  my  network”  •  use  anA-­‐monopoly  laws  if  needed  

Page 40: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Why?  

•  Civic  consideraAons  –  freedom  to  read  (passive)  –  freedom  to  discuss  &  create  (acAve)  

•  Economic  opportunity  –  edge  economy  >>  telecom  economy  

•  Telecom  revenue  (US):  $330B  •  Content,  etc.  not  that  large,  however  

–  Google:  $8.44B  •  others  that  depend  on  ability  to  provide  services  

–  content,  applicaAon,  service  providers  •  Technical  moAvaAon  

–  avoid  network  fragmentaAon  –  reduce  work-­‐around  complexity  

Page 41: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

April  30,  2007   NYC  network  neutrality  hearing  

How  to  be  non-­‐neutral  

deep  packet  inspecAon  (block  Skype)  

block  transport  protocol  (block  ports  insert  RST)  

block  IP  addresses  QoS  discriminaAon  (favor  own  content)  

 

applicaAon  

transport  

network  

Page 42: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Are  these  neutrality  issues?  

•  Redirect  DNS  NXDOMAIN  to  ISP  web  site  •  Content  translaAon  

–  e.g.,  reduce  image  resoluAon  for  cellular  data  •  Blocking  transport  protocols  other  than  UDP  +  TCP    

•  Prohibit  web  servers  •  Reset  DSCP  (ToS  bits)  •  Not  allow  IPv6  •  3GPP:  only  make  non-­‐BE  available  to  carrier  

Page 43: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Some  high-­‐profile  cases  

•  Madison  River  (2005)  – DSL  provider  blocked  SIP  ports  –  fined  $15,000  by  FCC  

•  Comcast  (late  2007)  –  insert  TCP  RST  into  BitTorrent  traffic  –  later  overturned  on  appeal  in  DC  Circuit  Court  

•  RCN  (2009):  P2P  •  Various  mobile  operators  •  Comcast  vs.  Level  3  (2010,  in  dispute)  

–  Level-­‐3  

Page 44: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Network  neutrality  &    freedom  of  speech  

•  Applies  only  to  U.S.  government,  not  private  enAAes  – Example:  soap  box  in  city  park  vs.  mall  – private  vs.  public  universiAes  

•  Freedom  to  speak  +  no  forced  speech  – demise  of  “fairness  doctrine”  (19xx)  

44  

1st  amendment:  Congress  shall  make  no  law  abridging  the  freedom  of  speech      

Page 45: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

New  name,  old  concept:  Common  carrier  

•  Since  1600s:  A  common  carrier  in  common-­‐law  countries  …  is  a  person  or  company  that  transports  goods  or  people  for  any  person  or  company  and  that  is  responsible  for  any  possible  loss  of  the  goods  during  transport.  A  common  carrier  offers  its  services  to  the  general  public  under  license  or  authority  provided  by  a  regulatory  body.  (Wikipedia)  

•  e.g.,  FedEx,  Greyhound,  telecommunicaAons  providers,  Disneyland  

45  

Page 46: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Network  transparency  

•  RFC  1958:  “Architectural  Principles  of  the  Internet”  However,  in  very  general  terms,  the  community  believes  that  the  goal  is  connecAvity,  the  tool  is  the  Internet  Protocol,  and  the  intelligence  is  end  to  end  rather  than  hidden  in  the  network.  

•  RFC  2275:  “Internet  Transparency”  –  NATs,  firewalls,  ALGs,  relays,  proxies,  split  DNS  

•  RFC  3724:  “The  Rise  of  the  Middle  and  the  Future  of  End-­‐to-­‐End:    ReflecAons  on  the  EvoluAon  of  the  Internet  Architecture”  

•  RFC  4924:  “ReflecAons  on  Internet  Transparency”  A  network  that  does  not  filter  or  transform  the  data  that  it  carries  may  be  said  to  be  "transparent"  or  "oblivious"  to  the  content  of  packets.    Networks  that  provide  oblivious  transport  enable  the  deployment  of  new  services  without  requiring  changes  to  the  core.    It  is  this  flexibility  that  is  perhaps  both  the  Internet's  most  essenAal  characterisAc  as  well  as  one  of  the  most  important  contributors  to  its  success.  

Page 47: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Network  transparency  and  neutrality  

neutral  transparent  

QoS  discriminaAon  pay  for  priority   block  protocol  features  

Page 48: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Means,  moAve  and  opportunity  

•  PoliAcal  moAvaAon  –  suppress  undesirable  opinion  

•  e.g.,  union  web  site,  aborAon  SMS  •  Economic  advantage  

–  prevent  compeAAon  in  related  services  •  e.g.,  VoIP  or  over-­‐the-­‐top  VoD  

–  leverage  pricing  power  •  OTT  content  provider  has  to  offer  service  to  everyone  

–  market  segmentaAon  •  consumer  vs.  business  customers  

•  Non-­‐tariff  barriers  –  e.g.,  special  (undocumented)  APIs  

48  

Page 49: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  US  hierarchy  of  laws  

ConsAtuAon   •  Commerce  clause  

Law  •  Telecom  Act  1934  &  1996  

47  CFR  

NarraAve  • reasonable  network  management  

SecAon  8:  To  regulate  Commerce  with  foreign  NaAons,  and  among  the  several  States,  and  with  the  Indian  Tribes  (1787)  

SEC.  706.  ADVANCED  TELECOMMUNICATIONS  INCENTIVES.  (a)  IN  GENERAL-­‐  The  Commission  …  shall  encourage  the  deployment  on  a  reasonable  and  Amely  basis  of  advanced  telecommunicaAons  capability  to  all  Americans  (including,  in  parAcular,  elementary  and  secondary  schools  and  classrooms)  by  uAlizing,  in  a  manner  consistent  with  the  public  interest,  convenience,  and  necessity,  …,  or  other  regulaAng  methods  that  remove  barriers  to  infrastructure  investment.  

Page 50: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Example:  CFR  47  

§  15.5      General  condi[ons  of  opera[on.  (a)  Persons  operaAng  intenAonal  or  unintenAonal  radiators  shall  not  be  deemed  to  have  any  vested  or  recognizable  right  to  conAnued  use  of  any  given  frequency  by  virtue  of  prior  registraAon  or  cerAficaAon  of  equipment,  or,  for  power  line  carrier  systems,  on  the  basis  of  prior  noAficaAon  of  use  pursuant  to  §90.35(g)  of  this  chapter.  (b)  OperaAon  of  an  intenAonal,  unintenAonal,  or  incidental  radiator  is  subject  to  the  condiAons  that  no  harmful  interference  is  caused  and  that  interference  must  be  accepted  that  may  be  caused  by  the  operaAon  of  an  authorized  radio  staAon,  by  another  intenAonal  or  unintenAonal  radiator,  by  industrial,  scienAfic  and  medical  (ISM)  equipment,  or  by  an  incidental  radiator.

   

Page 51: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Telecom  regulaAon  

•  Local,  state  and  federal  –  local:  CATV  franchise  agreements  –  state:  Public  UAlity  Commission  

•  responsible  for  all  uAliAes  –  gas,  water,  electricity,  telephone  –  federal:  FCC,  FTC  (privacy),  DOJ  (monopoly)  

•  Elsewhere:  gov’t  PTT  à  compeAAon  –  vs.  US:  regulated  private  monopolies  

•  Based  on  1934  TelecommunicaAons  Act  •  Amended  in  1996  •  Divides  the  world  into  

–  Title  I:  TelecommunicaAons  Services  –  Title  II:  Broadcast  Services  –  Title  III:  Cable  Services  –  Title  V:  Obscenity  and  Violence  

51  

Page 52: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Process  

NOI  • NoAce  of  Inquiry  

NPRM  • NoAce  of  Proposed  Rule  Making  

R&O  •  Report  &  Order  

comments  &  ex  parte  

Page 53: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Who  is  covered?  

Broadband  Internet  Access  Service  =  A  mass-­‐market  retail  service  by  wire  or  radio  that  provides  the  capability  to  transmit  data  to  and  receive  data  from  all  or  substanAally  all  Internet  endpoints,  including  any  capabiliAes  that  are  incidental  to  and  enable  the  operaAon  of  the  communicaAons  service,  but  excluding  dial-­‐up  Internet  access  service.  This  term  also  encompasses  any  service  that  the  Commission  finds  to  be  providing  a  funcAonal  equivalent  of  the  service  described  in  the  previous  sentence,  or  that  is  used  to  evade  the  protecAons  set  forth  in  this  Part.  

excludes  •  “edge  providers”:  CDNs,  search  engines,  …  

•  dial-­‐up  •  coffee  shops,  bookstores,  airlines  (premise  operators)  

Page 54: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Principles  

Transparency.  Fixed  and  mobile  broadband  providers  must  disclose  the  network  management  pracAces,  performance  characterisAcs,  and  terms  and  condiAons  of  their  broadband  services;  

No  blocking.  Fixed  broadband  providers  may  not  block  lawful  content,  applicaAons,  services,  or  non-­‐harmful  devices;  mobile  broadband  providers  may  not  block  lawful  websites,  or  block  applicaAons  that  compete  with  their  voice  or  video  telephony  services  

No  unreasonable  discrimina[on.  Fixed  broadband  providers  may  not  unreasonably  discriminate  in  transmiIng  lawful  network  traffic.  

54  

Page 55: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

FCC  Open  Internet  order  

55  

Wired   Wireless  

Disclosure   yes   yes  

Non-­‐blocking   every  protocol   “web”,  “VoIP”  

Non-­‐discriminaAon   reasonable  network  management  

“monitor”  

Page 56: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Some  corner  cases  

•  Parental  protecAon  –  user  (paying  subscriber…)  choice  

•  KosherNet  •  Spam  

– would  only  affect  IP-­‐level  blocking  

•  DOS  –  classified  as  unwanted  traffic  

56  

Page 57: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

What  about  congesAon?  

•  Open  Internet  rules  allow  charging  by  – access  rate  –  traffic  volume  

•  Content-­‐neutral  mechanisms  – normal  TCP  – e.g.,  Columbia  University:  “XXX”  

Page 58: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Open  Internet  &  QoS  

•  Principle  of  end  user  control  •  E.g.,  DiffServ  bits  or  signaling  

– RSVP  or  NSIS  – or  out-­‐of-­‐band  (“please  prioriAze  UDP  port  5050”)  

•  Together  with  rate  or  volume  limits  – “Includes  1,000  minutes  of  VoIP  priority”  

•  Technical  difficulAes  – DSCP  bit  re-­‐marking  – Symmetric  treatment  for  incoming  traffic  

Page 59: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Pay  for  Priority  (P4P)  

•  “Dear  Google:  We’ll  mark  your  packets  as  high  priority  for  just  $9.95/GB!  Hurry,  offer  ends  soon!”  

•  May  not  mafer  (much)  in  pracAce  – assumes  QoS  problems  and  local  congesAon  – but  related  to  paid  peering  (later)  

Page 60: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

FCC  challenge  

•  Difficult  to  determine  state  of  openness  – blocking,  content  discriminaAon  

Page 61: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

THE  NEXT  NN  BATTLE  

Peering  –  the  next  network  neutrality  challenge  

61  

Page 62: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

New  network  providers  

NID  2010  -­‐  Portsmouth,  NH  Craig  Labovitz,  “Internet  Traffic  and  Content  ConsolidaAon”,  IETF  March  2010.  

Page 63: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Internet  traffic  flows  today  

63  

backbone  (transit)  content   eyeball  ISP  

CDN  

CDN  

raAo  16:1?  

Page 64: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Internet  money  flows  today  

64  

content   eyeball  ISP  

CDN  backbone  (transit)  

$0  

or  $0  

“bill  &  keep”  

Page 65: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

April  2011   65  

Future  Internet  money  flows?  

65  

content   eyeball  ISP  

CDN  

backbone  (transit)  

$0  Level3  

Google  Netlix  

Tata  

Comcast  

new  

two-­‐sided  market  

Page 66: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  end  of  infinite  

Same  packets,  different  value  

Page 67: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  value  of  bits  

•  Technologist:  A  bit  is  a  bit  is  a  bit  •  Economist:  Some  bits  are  more  valuable  than  other  bits  

67  

Applica[on   Volume   Cost  per  unit   Cost  /  MB  

Voice  (13  kb/s  GSM)   97.5  kB/minute   10c   $1.02  

Mobile  data   5  GB   $40   $0.008  

MMS  (pictures)   <  300  KB,  avg.  50  kB   25c   $5.00  

SMS   160  B   10c   $625  

Page 68: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Service  separaAon  

•  Deep  packet  inspecAon  •  Block  or  charge  for  compeAng  services  

– voice  (Skype,  Fring,  …  vs.  IMS)  – SMS  (WhatsApp)  – video  (payTV:  $77,  NetFlix:  $7.99)  

•  See  KPN  and  other  European  carriers  – à  NL  net  neutrality  law  

Page 69: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Bandwidth  costs  

•  Amazon  EC2  –  $100/TB  in,  $100/TB  out  

•  CDN  (Internet  radio)  –  $600/TB  (2007)  –  $100/TB  (Q1  2009  –  CDNpricing.com)  

•  NetFlix  (7  GB  DVD)  –  postage  $0.70  round-­‐trip  à  $100/TB  

•  FedEx  –  2  lb  disk  –  5  business  days:  $6.55  –  Standard  overnight:  $43.68  –  Barracuda  disk:  $91  -­‐  $116/TB  

69  

Page 70: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Cost  of  broadband  

Access   Price  per  month  

Median  (average)  usage  

$/GB  

DSL  (3  MB/s  +  768  kb/s)   $30   1.7  GB  (9.2  GB)   $17.65  ($3.26)  

AT&T  UVerse   $0.20  beyond  150  GB  

Smartphone   $25   250  MB   $100  

Wireless  data  retail   $40   $10  

Web  hosAng   $1-­‐2  

CDN  pricing  (*)   $0.10  

*  strongly  depends  on  volume:  $0.25  GB/resale,  high  volume  (500  TB/month):  $0.05/GB      

Page 71: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Bandwidth  limits  

Label   Descrip[on   Cap  exceeded   Mo[va[on   Consumer  impact  

Usage  cap   Subscriber  limited  to  monthly  bandwidth  quota  (e.g.,  100  GB/month)    

•  Reduced  speed  

•  email  warning  •  contract  

terminaAon  

•  reduce  impact  of  small  number  of  very  heavy  users  

•  reduce  P2P  usage  

•  depends  on  cap  

•  more  and  more  consumers  

Tiered  service   caps  by  Aer   same   Market  segmentaAon  light  vs.  heavy  users  

less  transparency  

Metered  service   Monthly  base  +  linear  fee  ($/GB)  

metered  bandwidth  billing  

Usage-­‐induced  revenue  ProtecAon  again  compeAng  services  

•  Priced  in  excess  of  cost  

•  bill  shock  

Page 72: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Examples  

!

Page 73: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Spectrum  

Page 74: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Spectrum  

•  100+  years  of  legacy  use  –  is  this  like  land  ownership?  –  why  would  anybody  move?  –  see  FCC  white  spaces  effort  

•  FragmentaAon  –  end  systems  need  mulAple  RF  front  ends  –  o{en  limited  by  chip  design    

•  Receiver  standards  –  dealing  with  OOBE  

U.S. DEPARTMENT O F C O MMERCE

NATIO

NA

L TELEC

OM

M

UN I C ATI O NS & INF O RM ATION

AD

MIN

ISTR

ATIO

N

MOBIL

E (A

ERON

AUTIC

AL TE

LEME

TERI

NG)

S)

5.68

5.73

5.90

5.95

6.2

6.52

5

6.68

56.

765

7.0

7.1

7.3

7.35

8.1

8.19

5

8.81

58.

965

9.04

0

9.4

9.5

9.9

9.99

510

.003

10.0

0510

.110

.15

11.1

7511

.275

11.4

11.6

11.6

5

12.0

512

.10

12.2

3

13.2

13.2

613

.36

13.4

113

.57

13.6

13.8

13.8

714

.014

.25

14.3

5

14.9

9015

.005

15.0

1015

.10

15.6

15.8

16.3

6

17.4

117

.48

17.5

5

17.9

17.9

718

.03

18.0

6818

.168

18.7

818

.919

.02

19.6

819

.80

19.9

9019

.995

20.0

0520

.010

21.0

21.4

521

.85

21.9

2422

.0

22.8

5523

.023

.223

.35

24.8

924

.99

25.0

0525

.01

25.0

725

.21

25.3

325

.55

25.6

726

.126

.175

26.4

826

.95

26.9

627

.23

27.4

127

.54

28.0

29.7

29.8

29.8

929

.91

30.0

UNITEDSTATES

THE RADIO SPECTRUM

NON-GOVERNMENT EXCLUSIVE

GOVERNMENT/ NON-GOVERNMENT SHAREDGOVERNMENT EXCLUSIVE

RADIO SERVICES COLOR LEGEND

ACTIVITY CODE

NOT ALLOCATED RADIONAVIGATION FIXED

MARITIME MOBILEFIXED

MARITIME MOBILE

FIXED

MARITIME MOBILE

Radiolocation RADIONAVIGATION

FIXED

MARITIMEMOBILE

Radiolocation

FIXED

MARITIMEMOBILE FIXED

MARITIMEMOBILE

AERONAUTICALRADIONAVIGATION

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADIO

NAVIG

ATIO

NAe

ronau

tical

Mobil

eMa

ritime

Radio

navig

ation

(Rad

io Be

acon

s)MA

RITIM

ERA

DIONA

VIGAT

ION

(RAD

IO BE

ACON

S)Ae

ronau

tical

Radio

navig

ation

(Rad

io Be

acon

s)

3 9 14 19.9

5

20.0

5

30 30 59 61 70 90 110

130

160

190

200

275

285

300

3 kHz 300 kHz

300 kHz 3 MHz

3 MHz 30 MHz

30 MHz 300 MHz

3 GHz

300 GHz

300 MHz

3 GHz

30 GHz

AeronauticalRadionavigation(Radio Beacons)

MARITIMERADIONAVIGATION(RADIO BEACONS)

Aeron

autic

alMo

bile

Mariti

meRa

diona

vigati

on(R

adio

Beac

ons)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADIO

NAVIG

ATIO

N(R

ADIO

BEAC

ONS)

AERONAUTICALRADIONAVIGATION(RADIO BEACONS)

AeronauticalMobile

Aeron

autica

l Mob

ileRA

DIONA

VIGAT

ION

AER

ONAU

TICAL

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE AeronauticalRadionavigation

MOB

ILE (D

ISTR

ESS

AND

CALL

ING)

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE(S

HIPS

ONL

Y)

MOBI

LE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

(RAD

IO B

EACO

NS)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADIO

NAVIG

ATIO

N(R

ADIO

BEA

CONS

)

BROADCASTING(AM RADIO)

MARI

TIME M

OBILE

(TEL

EPHO

NY)

MARI

TIME M

OBILE

(TEL

EPHO

NY)

MOB

ILE (D

ISTRE

SS AN

D CAL

LING)

MARITIMEMOBILE

LAND MOBILE

MOBILE

FIXED STAN

DARD

FREQ

. AND

TIME

SIGN

AL (2

500k

Hz)

STAN

DARD

FREQ

. AND

TIME

SIGN

ALSp

ace R

esea

rch MARITIMEMOBILE

LAND MOBILE

MOBILE

FIXED

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOBIL

E (R)

STAN

DARD

FREQ

.

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOBIL

E (OR

)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOBIL

E (R)

FIXED

MOBILE**

Radio-location

FIXED

MOBI

LE*

AMATEUR

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXEDMARITIME

MOBILE

MOBI

LE*

MOBI

LE*

MOBI

LEST

ANDA

RD FR

EQ. A

ND TI

ME SI

GNAL

(500

0 KHZ

)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (O

R)

STAN

DARD

FREQ

.Sp

ace R

esea

rch

MOBILE**

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (O

R) FIXE

DMO

BILE

*

BROA

DCAS

TING

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)AE

RONA

UTIC

AL M

OBILE

(OR) FIX

EDMo

bile

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR

FIXED

Mobile

MARIT

IME M

OBILE

MARITIMEMOBILE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)AE

RONA

UTIC

AL M

OBILE

(OR)

FIXE

D

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

STAN

DARD

FREQ

. AND

TIME

SIGN

AL (1

0,000

kHz)

STAN

DARD

FREQ

.Sp

ace R

esea

rchAE

RONA

UTIC

AL M

OBILE

(R)

AMAT

EUR

FIXED

Mobile* AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)AE

RONA

UTIC

AL M

OBILE

(OR)

FIXED

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL M

OBILE

(R)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL M

OBILE

(OR)

RADIO

ASTR

ONOM

YMo

bile*

AMAT

EUR

BROA

DCAS

TING

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR S

ATEL

LITE

Mobil

e*FIX

ED

BROA

DCAS

TING

STAN

DARD

FREQ

. AND

TIME

SIGN

AL (1

5,000

kHz)

STAN

DARD

FREQ

.Sp

ace R

esea

rch

FIXED

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (O

R)

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (O

R)AE

RONA

UTIC

AL M

OBILE

(R)

FIXED

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

STAN

DARD

FREQ

.Sp

ace R

esea

rch

FIXED

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE

Mobil

eFIX

ED

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

Mob

ile*

MOB

ILE**

FIXED

STAN

DARD

FREQ

. AND

TIME

SIGN

AL (2

5,000

kHz)

STAN

DARD

FREQ

.Sp

ace R

esea

rch LA

ND M

OBILE

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE LA

ND M

OBILE

MOB

ILE**

RAD

IO A

STRO

NOMY

BROA

DCAS

TING

MARI

TIME

MOBI

LE LA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

MOB

ILE**

FIXED

MOB

ILE**

MOB

ILE

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

LAND

MOBIL

E

MOB

ILE**

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

MOB

ILE

LAND

MOB

ILE

MOBI

LE

MOBI

LE

FIXED

FIXED

MOBI

LE

MOBI

LE

FIXED

FIXED

LAND

MOBI

LE

LAND

MOBI

LE

LAND

MOBI

LE

LAND

MOB

ILERa

dio A

stron

omy

RADIO

AST

RONO

MYLA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

FIXED

MOBI

LEMOBIL

E

MOBILE

LAND

MOB

ILE

FIXED

LAND

MOBI

LE

FIXED

FIXED

MOBI

LE

MOBIL

E

LANDMOBILE AMATEUR

BROADCASTING(TV CHANNELS 2-4)

FIXED

MOBI

LE

FIXED

MOBI

LE

FIXED

MOBI

LEFIX

EDMO

BILE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RAD

IONA

VIGA

TION

BROADCASTING(TV CHANNELS 5-6)

BROADCASTING(FM RADIO)

AERONAUTICALRADIONAVIGATION

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOBI

LE (R

)AE

RONA

UTIC

AL M

OBILE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOBI

LE (R

)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOBI

LE (R

)AE

RONA

UTIC

AL M

OBILE

(R)

MOBI

LEFI

XED

AMAT

EUR

BROADCASTING(TV CHANNELS 7-13)

MOBILE

FIXED

MOBILE

FIXED

MOBILE SATELLITE

FIXED

MOBILESATELLITE

MOBILE

FIXED

MOBILESATELLITE

MOBILE

FIXED

MOBI

LEAE

RONA

UTIC

AL R

ADIO

NAVIG

ATIO

N

STD.

FREQ

. & TI

ME SI

GNAL

SAT.

(400.1

MHz

)ME

T. SAT.

(S-E)

SPAC

E RES

.(S-

E)Ea

rth Ex

pl.Sa

tellite

(E-S

)

MOBI

LE S

ATEL

LITE

(E-S

)FIX

EDMO

BILE

RADI

OAS

TRON

OMY

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NAm

ateur

LAND

MOB

ILE

MeteorologicalSatellite (S-E)

LAND

MOB

ILEBR

OADC

ASTIN

G(TV

CHAN

NELS

14 - 2

0)

BROADCASTING(TV CHANNELS 21-36)

TV BROADCASTINGRADI

O AS

TRON

OMY

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

N

FIXED

Amate

ur

AERONAUTICALRADIONAVIGATION

MOBI

LE**

FIXED

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADIO

NAVIG

ATION

Radio

locati

on

Radio

locati

onMA

RITIM

ERA

DION

AVIG

ATIO

N

MARI

TIME

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

Radio

locati

on

Radiolocation

Radiolocation

RADIO-LOCATION RADIO-

LOCATION

Amateur

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADIO

NAVIG

ATION

(Grou

nd)

RADIO

-LO

CATIO

NRa

dio-

locatio

n

AERO

. RAD

IO-NA

V.(Gro

und)

FIXED

SAT.

(S-E)

RADIO

-LO

CATIO

NRa

dio-

locatio

n

FIXED

FIXEDSATELLITE

(S-E)

FIXED

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RAD

IONA

VIGAT

ION MO

BILE

FIXED

MOBIL

E

RADI

O AS

TRON

OMY

Space

Resea

rch (P

assive

)AE

RONA

UTIC

AL R

ADIO

NAVIG

ATIO

N

RADI

O-LO

CATIO

NRa

dio-

locati

onRA

DION

AVIG

ATIO

NRa

dioloc

ation

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NRa

dioloc

ation

Radio

locati

on

Radio

locati

onRA

DIOL

OCAT

ION

RADI

O-LO

CATIO

N

MARI

TIME

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

MARI

TIME

RADIO

NAVIG

ATIO

NME

TEOR

OLOG

ICAL

AIDS

Amate

urAm

ateur

FIXED

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

MOBIL

E

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

MOBI

LE

FIXED FIX

ED

FIXED

FIXED

MOBIL

E

FIXED

SPAC

E RES

EARC

H (E-

S)FIX

EDFix

edMO

BILE

SATE

LLITE

(S-E)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(S-E)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(S-E)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(S-E)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(S-E)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

MET.

SATE

LLITE

(S-E)

Mobile

Satell

ite (S-

E)Mo

bileSa

tellite

(S-E)

Mobile

Satell

ite (E-

S)(no

airbo

rne)

Mobile

Satell

ite(E-

S)(no

airborn

e)

Mobile

Satell

ite (S-

E)

Mobile

Satell

ite (E-

S)

MOBIL

ESA

TELL

ITE (E

-S)EA

RTH E

XPL.

SATE

LLITE

(S-E)

EART

H EXP

L.SA

T. (S-E

)

EART

H EXP

L.SA

TELLI

TE (S

-E)

MET.

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

FIXED

SPAC

E RES

EARC

H (S-E

)(de

ep sp

ace on

ly)SP

ACE R

ESEA

RCH (

S-E)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NRa

dioloc

ation

Radio

locati

on

Radio

locati

on

Radio

locati

on

MARI

TIME

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION Me

teorol

ogica

lAid

sRA

DIONA

VIGAT

ION

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NRa

dioloc

ation

RADI

O-LO

CATIO

NRa

dioloc

ation

Radio

locati

onAm

ateur

Amate

urAm

ateur

Satel

liteRA

DIOL

OCAT

ION

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXE

DFIXEDSATELLITE

(S-E)

FIXEDSATELLITE

(S-E)

Mobile **

SPAC

E RES

EARC

H(Pa

ssive)

EART

H EX

PL.

SAT.

(Passi

ve)RA

DIOAS

TRON

OMY

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH (P

assive

)EA

RTH

EXPL

.SA

TELL

ITE (P

assive

)RA

DIO

ASTR

ONOM

Y

BROA

DCAS

TING

SATE

LLITE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL R

ADION

AV.

Space

Rese

arch (

E-S)

SpaceResearch

Land

Mob

ileSa

tellite

(E-S)

Radio

-loc

ation

RADIO

-LO

CATIO

N

RADIO

NAVIG

ATION FI

XED

SATE

LLIT

E (E

-S)

Land

Mob

ileSa

tellite

(E-S

)

Land

Mob

ileSa

tellite

(E-S)

Fixed

Mobil

eFIX

ED SA

T. (E

-S)

Fixed

Mobil

eFIX

ED

Mobil

eFIX

ED

MOBIL

ESp

ace R

esearc

hSp

ace R

esearc

h

Space

Rese

arch

SPAC

E RES

EARC

H(Pa

ssive

)RA

DIO A

STRO

NOMY

EART

H EXP

L. SA

T.(Pa

ssive

)

Radio

locatio

nRA

DIOL

OCAT

ION

Radio

locati

on

FX S

AT (E

-S)

FIXED

SAT

ELLIT

E (E

-S)FI

XED

FIXED

FIXE

DMO

BILE

EART

H EXP

L.SA

T. (Pa

ssive)

MOBI

LE

Earth

Expl.

Satell

ite (Ac

tive)

Stand

ardFre

quen

cy an

dTim

e Sign

alSa

tellite

(E-S)

Earth

Explo

ration

Satell

ite(S-

S)MO

BILE

FIXED

MOBI

LEFI

XED

Earth

Explo

ration

Satell

ite (S-

S)

FIXE

DMO

BILE

FIXE

DSA

T (E

-S)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

MOBIL

E SAT

ELLIT

E (E-S

)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S

)

MOBIL

ESA

TELL

ITE(E

-S)

Stand

ardFre

quen

cy an

dTim

e Sign

alSa

tellite

(S-E)

Stand

. Freq

uency

and T

ime Si

gnal

Satell

ite (S-

E)FIX

EDMO

BILE

RADI

OAS

TRON

OMY

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH(P

assiv

e)EA

RTH

EXPL

ORAT

ION

SAT.

(Passi

ve)

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

INTE

R-SA

TELL

ITE

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NRa

dioloc

ation

SPAC

E RE

..(P

assiv

e)EA

RTH E

XPL.

SAT.

(Passi

ve)FI

XED

MOBI

LE

FIXE

DMO

BILE

FIXE

DMO

BILE

Mobil

eFi

xedFIX

EDSA

TELL

ITE (S

-E)

BROA

D-CA

STIN

GBC

STSA

T.

FIXED

MOBIL

E

FXSA

T(E-

S)MO

BILE

FIXE

D

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATIO

NSA

TELL

ITEFI

XED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

MOBIL

ESA

TELLI

TE (E

-S)

MOBI

LEFI

XED

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH(P

assiv

e)

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATION

SATE

LLITE

(Passi

ve)

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATIO

NSA

T. (Pa

ssive

)SP

ACE

RESE

ARCH

(Pas

sive)

INTER

-SA

TELL

ITERA

DIO-

LOCA

TION

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CHFI

XED

MOBILE

F IXED

MOBILESATELLITE

(E-S)

MOBIL

ESA

TELL

ITERA

DIONA

VIGAT

IONRA

DIO-

NAVIG

ATION

SATE

LLITE

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATION

SATE

LLITE F IXED

SATELLITE(E-S)

MOBIL

EFIX

EDFIX

EDSA

TELL

ITE (E

-S)

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

Amate

urSa

tellite

Amate

urRA

DIO-

LOCA

TION

MOBIL

EFIX

EDMO

BILE

SATE

LLITE

(S-E

)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(S-E

)

MOBIL

EFIX

EDBR

OAD-

CAST

ING

SATE

LLITE

BROA

D-CA

STIN

G

SPACERESEARCH

(Passive)

RADIOASTRONOMY

EARTHEXPLORATION

SATELLITE(Passive)

MOBILE

FIXE

D

MOBIL

EFIX

EDRA

DIO-

LOCA

TION

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S

)

MOBILESATELLITE

RADIO-NAVIGATIONSATELLITE

RADIO-NAVIGATION

Radio-location

EART

H EX

PL.

SATE

LLITE

(Pas

sive)

SPAC

E RES

EARC

H(P

assiv

e)

FIXE

DFI

XED

SATE

LLIT

E(S

-E)

SPACERESEARCH

(Passive)

RADIOASTRONOMY

EARTHEXPLORATION

SATELLITE(Passive)

FIXED

MOBILE

MOBI

LEINT

ER-

SATE

LLITE

RADIO-LOCATION

INTER-SATELLITE

Radio-location

MOBILE

MOBILESATELLITE

RADIO-NAVIGATION

RADIO-NAVIGATIONSATELLITE

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

Amate

urAm

ateur

Satel

liteRA

DIO-

LOCA

TION

MOBIL

EFIX

EDFIX

EDSA

TELL

ITE (S

-E)

MOBIL

EFIX

EDFIX

EDSA

TELL

ITE(S

-E)

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATIO

NSA

TELL

ITE (P

assiv

e)SP

ACE R

ES.

(Pas

sive)

SPAC

E RES

.(P

assiv

e)

RADI

OAS

TRON

OMY

FIXEDSATELLITE

(S-E)

FIXED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

SPAC

E RES

EARC

H(P

assiv

e)RA

DIO

ASTR

ONOM

YEA

RTH

EXPL

ORAT

ION

SATE

LLITE

(Pas

sive)

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATION

SAT. (

Passi

ve)

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH(Pa

ssive)

INTER

-SA

TELL

ITE

INTE

R-SA

TELL

ITE

INTE

R-SA

TELL

ITE

INTE

R-SA

TELL

ITE

MOBILE

MOBILE

MOBIL

EMOBILESATELLITE

RADIO-NAVIGATION

RADIO-NAVIGATIONSATELLITE

FIXEDSATELLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

FIXED

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATION

SAT.

(Passi

ve)

SPAC

E RES

.(Pa

ssive)

SPACERESEARCH

(Passive)

RADIOASTRONOMY

EARTHEXPLORATION

SATELLITE(Passive)

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(S-E

)FIX

EDSA

TELL

ITE(S-

E) FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(S-E

)

EART

H EXP

L.SA

T. (Pa

ssive)

SPAC

E RES

.(Pa

ssive)

Radio

-loc

ation

Radio

-loc

ation

RADI

O-LO

CATIO

NAM

ATEU

RAM

ATEU

R SA

TELL

ITE

Amate

urAm

ateur

Satel

lite

EART

H EXP

LORA

TION

SATE

LLITE

(Pas

sive)

SPAC

E RE

S. (P

assiv

e)

MOBILE

MOBILESATELLITE

RADIO-NAVIGATION

RADIO-NAVIGATIONSATELLITE

MOBILE

MOBILE

FIXED

RADIO-ASTRONOMY

FIXEDSATELLITE

(E-S)

FIXED

3.0

3.02

5

3.15

5

3.23

0

3.4

3.5

4.0

4.06

3

4.43

8

4.65

4.7

4.75

4.85

4.99

55.

003

5.00

55.

060

5.45

MARITIMEMOBILE

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

FIXED

Mobil

eMA

RITIM

E MOB

ILE

STAN

DARD

FREQ

UENC

Y & TI

ME SI

GNAL

(20,0

00 K

HZ)

Spac

e Res

earch

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (O

R)

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

AMAT

EUR

MET. S

AT. (S

-E)MO

B. SA

T. (S-E

)SP

ACE R

ES. (S

-E)SP

ACE O

PN. (S

-E)ME

T. SAT

. (S-E)

Mob.

Sat. (

S-E)

SPAC

E RES

. (S-E)

SPAC

E OPN

. (S-E)

MET. S

AT. (S

-E)MO

B. SA

T. (S-E

)SP

ACE R

ES. (S

-E)SP

ACE O

PN. (S

-E)ME

T. SAT

. (S-E)

Mob.

Sat. (

S-E)

SPAC

E RES

. (S-E)

SPAC

E OPN

. (S-E)

MOBILE

FIXED

FIXED

Land

Mob

ileFIX

EDMO

BILE

LAND

MOB

ILE

LAND

MOB

ILE

MAR

ITIME

MOB

ILE M

ARITI

ME M

OBILE

MAR

ITIME

MOB

ILE MAR

ITIME

MOB

ILE

LAND

MOB

ILE

FIXED

MOBI

LEMO

BILE S

ATELL

ITE (E

-S)

Radio

locati

onRa

dioloc

ation

LAND

MOB

ILEAM

ATEU

R

MOB

ILE SA

TELL

ITE (E

-S) RA

DIONA

VIGAT

ION SA

TELL

ITE

MET.

AIDS

(Radio

sonde

) M

ETEO

ROLO

GICA

L AIDS

(RAD

IOSO

NDE)

SPAC

E RE

SEAR

CH (S

-S)FIX

EDMO

BILE

LAND

MOB

ILEFIX

EDLA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

FIXED

RADI

O AS

TRON

OMY

RADI

O AS

TRON

OMY

METE

OROL

OGIC

ALAI

DS (R

ADIO

SOND

E)

METE

OROL

OGIC

ALAI

DS (R

adios

onde

)ME

TEOR

OLOG

ICAL

SATE

LLITE

(s-E

)

Fixed

FIXED

MET. SAT.(s-E)

FIXE

D

FIXED

AERO

NAUT

ICAL M

OBILE

SATE

LLITE

(R) (s

pace

to Ea

rth)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL R

ADION

AVIGA

TION

RADIO

NAV.

SATE

LLITE

(Spac

e to Ea

rth)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL M

OBILE

SATE

LLITE

(R)

(space

to Ear

th)Mo

bile Sa

tellite

(S- E)

RADIO

DET. S

AT. (E

-S)MO

BILE

SAT(

E-S)

AERO

. RAD

IONAV

IGATIO

NAE

RO. R

ADION

AV.

AERO

. RAD

IONAV

.RA

DIO DE

T. SAT

. (E-S)

RADIO

DET. S

AT. (E

-S)MO

BILE S

AT. (E

-S)MO

BILE S

AT. (E

-S)Mo

bile Sa

t. (S-E

)RA

DIO AS

TRON

OMY

RADI

O AS

TRON

OMY

MOB

ILE S

AT. (

E-S)

FIXED

MOBI

LE

FIXED

FIXE

D(LO

S)MO

BILE

(LOS)

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH(s-

E)(s-s

)

SPAC

EOP

ERAT

ION(s-

E)(s-s

)EA

RTH

EXPLO

RATIO

NSA

T. (s-E

)(s-s)

Amate

ur

MOBI

LEFix

edRA

DIOLO

CATIO

N

AMAT

EUR

RADI

O AS

TRON

.SP

ACE

RESE

ARCH

EART

H E

XPL

SAT

FIXED

SAT

. (S

-E)

FIXED

MOBILE

FIXEDSATELLITE (S-E)

FIXED

MOBIL

EFIX

EDSA

TELL

ITE (E

-S)

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S

)MO

BILE

FIXED

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH (S

-E)(De

ep Sp

ace) AE

RONA

UTICA

L RAD

IONA

VIGAT

ION

EART

HEX

PL. SA

T.(Pa

ssive)

300

325

335

405

415

435

495

505

510

525

535

1605

1615

1705

1800

1900

2000

2065

2107

2170

2173

.521

90.5

2194

2495

2501

2502

2505

2850

3000

RADIO-LOCATION

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

MOBILE

AMAT

EUR

RADIO

LOCA

TION

MOBIL

EFIX

EDMA

RITIM

EMO

BILE

MARI

TIME M

OBILE

(TEL

EPHO

NY)

MARIT

IME

MOBIL

ELA

NDMO

BILE

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

30.0

30.5

6

32.0

33.0

34.0

35.0

36.0

37.0

37.5

38.0

38.2

539

.0

40.0

42.0

43.6

9

46.6

47.0

49.6

50.0

54.0

72.0

73.0

74.6

74.8

75.2

75.4

76.0

88.0

108.

0

117.

975

121.

9375

123.

0875

123.

5875

128.

8125

132.

0125

136.

013

7.0

137.

025

137.

175

137.

825

138.

0

144.

014

6.0

148.

014

9.9

150.

0515

0.8

152.

855

154.

015

6.24

7515

7.03

7515

7.18

7515

7.45

161.

575

161.

625

161.

775

162.

0125

173.

217

3.4

174.

0

216.

0

220.

022

2.0

225.

0

235.

0

300

ISM – 6.78 ± .015 MHz ISM – 13.560 ± .007 MHz ISM – 27.12 ± .163 MHz

ISM – 40.68 ± .02 MHz

ISM – 24.125 ± 0.125 GHz 30 GHz

ISM – 245.0 ± 1GHzISM – 122.5 ± .500 GHzISM – 61.25 ± .250 GHz

300.

0

322.

0

328.

6

335.

4

399.

940

0.05

400.

1540

1.0

402.

0

403.

040

6.0

406.

1

410.

0

420.

0

450.

045

4.0

455.

045

6.0

460.

046

2.537

546

2.737

546

7.537

546

7.737

547

0.0

512.

0

608.

061

4.0

698

746

764

776

794

806

821

824

849

851

866

869

894

896

9019

0190

2

928

929

930

931

932

935

940

941

944

960

1215

1240

1300

1350

1390

1392

1395

2000

2020

2025

2110

2155

2160

2180

2200

2290

2300

2305

2310

2320

2345

2360

2385

2390

2400

2417

2450

2483

.525

0026

5526

9027

00

2900

3000

1400

1427

1429

.5

1430

1432

1435

1525

1530

1535

1544

1545

1549

.5

1558

.515

5916

1016

10.6

1613

.816

26.5

1660

1660

.516

68.4

1670

1675

1700

1710

1755

1850

MARIT

IME MO

BILE S

ATELL

ITE(sp

ace to

Earth)

MOBIL

E SAT

ELLITE

(S-E)

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NRA

DION

AVIG

ATIO

NSA

TELL

ITE (S

-E)

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NAm

ateur

Radio

locati

onAE

RONA

UTIC

ALRA

DION

AVIG

ATIO

N

SPA

CE R

ESEA

RCH

( Pas

sive)

EART

H EX

PL S

AT (P

assiv

e)RA

DIO

AST

RONO

MY

MOBI

LEMO

BILE

**FIX

ED-SA

T

(E-S)

FIXED

FIXED FIX

ED**

LAND M

OBILE

(TLM

)

MOBIL

E SAT

.(Sp

ace to

Earth)

MARIT

IME MO

BILE S

AT.

(Space

to Ea

rth)Mo

bile(Ae

ro. TL

M)

MOBIL

E SA

TELL

ITE (S

-E)

MOBIL

E SAT

ELLITE

(Space

to Ear

th)AE

RONA

UTICA

L MOB

ILE SA

TELLI

TE (R

)(sp

ace to

Earth)

3.0

3.1

3.3

3.5

3.6

3.65

3.7

4.2

4.4

4.5

4.8

4.94

4.99

5.0

5.15

5.25

5.35

5.46

5.47

5.6

5.65

5.83

5.85

5.92

5

6.42

5

6.52

5

6.70

6.87

5

7.02

57.

075

7.12

5

7.19

7.23

57.

257.

307.

45

7.55

7.75

7.90

8.02

5

8.17

5

8.21

5

8.4

8.45

8.5

9.0

9.2

9.3

9.5

10.0

10.4

510

.510

.55

10.6

10.6

8

10.7

11.7

12.2

12.7

12.7

5

13.2

513

.4

13.7

514

.0

14.2

14.4

14.4

714

.514

.7145

15.13

65

15.3

5

15.4

15.4

3

15.6

315

.716

.617

.1

17.2

17.3

17.7

17.8

18.3

18.6

18.8

19.3

19.7

20.1

20.2

21.2

21.4

22.0

22.2

122

.5

22.5

5

23.5

5

23.6

24.0

24.0

5

24.2

524

.45

24.6

5

24.7

5

25.0

5

25.2

525

.527

.0

27.5

29.5

29.9

30.0

ISM – 2450.0 ± 50 MHz

30.0

31.0

31.3

31.8

32.0

32.3

33.0

33.4

36.0

37.0

37.6

38.0

38.6

39.5

40.0

40.5

41.0

42.5

43.5

45.5

46.9

47.0

47.2

48.2

50.2

50.4

51.4

52.6

54.2

555

.78

56.9

57.0

58.2

59.0

59.3

64.0

65.0

66.0

71.0

74.0

75.5

76.0

77.0

77.5

78.0

81.0

84.0

86.0

92.0

95.0

100.

0

102.

0

105.

0

116.

0

119.

98

120.

02

126.

0

134.

0

142.

014

4.0

149.

0

150.

0

151.

0

164.

0

168.

0

170.

0

174.

5

176.

5

182.

0

185.

0

190.

0

200.

0

202.

0

217.

0

231.

0

235.

023

8.0

241.

0

248.

0

250.

0

252.

0

265.

0

275.

0

300.

0

ISM – 5.8 ± .075 GHz

ISM – 915.0 ± 13 MHz

INTER

-SATE

LLITE

RADIO

LOCA

TION

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADIO

NAV.

PLEASE NOTE: THE SPACING ALLOTTED THE SERVICES IN THE SPEC-TRUM SEGMENTS SHOWN IS NOT PROPORTIONAL TO THE ACTUAL AMOUNTOF SPECTRUM OCCUPIED.

AERONAUTICALMOBILE

AERONAUTICALMOBILE SATELLITE

AERONAUTICALRADIONAVIGATION

AMATEUR

AMATEUR SATELLITE

BROADCASTING

BROADCASTINGSATELLITE

EARTH EXPLORATIONSATELLITE

FIXED

FIXED SATELLITE

INTER-SATELLITE

LAND MOBILE

LAND MOBILESATELLITE

MARITIME MOBILE

MARITIME MOBILESATELLITE

MARITIMERADIONAVIGATION

METEOROLOGICALAIDS

METEOROLOGICALSATELLITE

MOBILE

MOBILE SATELLITE

RADIO ASTRONOMY

RADIODETERMINATIONSATELLITE

RADIOLOCATION

RADIOLOCATION SATELLITE

RADIONAVIGATION

RADIONAVIGATIONSATELLITE

SPACE OPERATION

SPACE RESEARCH

STANDARD FREQUENCYAND TIME SIGNAL

STANDARD FREQUENCYAND TIME SIGNAL SATELLITE

RADI

O AS

TRON

OMY

FIXED

MARITIME MOBILE

FIXED

MARITIMEMOBILE Aeronautical

Mobile

STAN

DARD

FREQ

. AND

TIME

SIGN

AL (6

0 kHz

)FIX

EDMo

bile*

STAN

D. FR

EQ. &

TIME

SIG.

MET. A

IDS(Ra

dioson

de)Spa

ce Op

n. (S

-E)MO

BILE.

SAT. (

S-E)

Fixed

Standa

rdFre

q. and

Time S

ignal

Satell

ite (E-

S)

FIXE

D

STAN

DARD

FREQ

. AND

TIME

SIGN

AL (2

0 kHz

)

Amate

ur

MOBI

LE

FIXED

SAT.

(E-S)

Space

Resea

rch

ALLOCATION USAGE DESIGNATIONSERVICE EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION

Primary FIXED Capital LettersSecondary Mobi le 1st Capital with lower case letters

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENational Telecommunications and Information AdministrationOffice of Spectrum Management

October 2003

MOBIL

EBR

OADC

ASTIN

G

TRAVELERS INFORMATION STATIONS (G) AT 1610 kHz

59-64 GHz IS DESIGNATED FORUNLICENSED DEVICES

Fixed

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

RADI

ONAV

IGAT

ION

SPAC

E RES

EARC

H (Pa

ssive

)

* EXCEPT AERO MOBILE (R)

** EXCEPT AERO MOBILE WAVELENGTH

BANDDESIGNATIONS

ACTIVITIES

FREQUENCY

3 x 107m 3 x 106m 3 x 105m 30,000 m 3,000 m 300 m 30 m 3 m 30 cm 3 cm 0.3 cm 0.03 cm 3 x 105Å 3 x 104Å 3 x 103Å 3 x 102Å 3 x 10Å 3Å 3 x 10-1Å 3 x 10-2Å 3 x 10-3Å 3 x 10-4Å 3 x 10-5Å 3 x 10-6Å 3 x 10-7Å

0 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz 10 kHz 100 kHz 1 MHz 10 MHz 100 MHz 1 GHz 10 GHz 100 GHz 1 THz 1013Hz 1014Hz 1015Hz 1016Hz 1017Hz 1018Hz 1019Hz 1020Hz 1021Hz 1022Hz 1023Hz 1024Hz 1025Hz

THE RADIO SPECTRUMMAGNIFIED ABOVE3 kHz 300 GHz

VERY LOW FREQUENCY (VLF)Audible Range AM Broadcast FM Broadcast Radar Sub-Millimeter Visible Ultraviolet Gamma-ray Cosmic-ray

Infra-sonics Sonics Ultra-sonics Microwaves InfraredP L S XC Radar

Bands

LF MF HF VHF UHF SHF EHF INFRARED VISIBLE ULTRAVIOLET X-RAY GAMMA-RAY COSMIC-RAY

X-ray

ALLOCATIONSFREQUENCY

BRO

ADCA

STIN

GFI

XED

MO

BILE

*

BRO

ADCA

STIN

GFI

XED

BRO

ADCA

STIN

G

FIX

ED

Mob

ile

FIX

EDBR

OAD

CAST

ING

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

BROA

DCAS

TING

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

LAND

MOBI

LE

FIXE

D

AERO

NAUT

ICAL

MOB

ILE (R

)

AMAT

EUR

SATE

LLITE

AMAT

EUR MO

BILE

SATE

LLITE

(E-S

)

FIXE

D

Fixe

dMo

bile

Radi

o-lo

catio

nFI

XED

MOBI

LE

LAND

MOB

ILE M

ARITI

ME M

OBILE

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILE

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILE

RAD

ION

AV-S

ATEL

LITE

FIXED

MOBI

LEFIX

ED LA

ND M

OBILE

MET. A

IDS(Ra

dio-

sond

e)SP

ACE O

PN.

(S-E)

Earth

Expl S

at(E-

S)Me

t-Sate

llite (E

-S)ME

T-SAT

. (E

-S)EA

RTH E

XPL

SAT. (

E-S)

Earth

Expl S

at(E-

S)Me

t-Sate

llite (E

-S)EA

RTH E

XPL

SAT. (

E-S)

MET-S

AT.

(E-S)

LAND

MOB

ILELA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILEFIX

ED

FIXED

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILELA

ND M

OBILE FIX

ED LA

ND M

OBILE

LAND

MOB

ILE LA

ND M

OBILE

LAND

MOB

ILE

MOBI

LEFIX

ED

MOBI

LEFIX

ED

BRO

ADCA

STMO

BILE

FIXED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILELA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILE AERO

NAUT

ICAL M

OBILE

AERO

NAUT

ICAL M

OBILE FIX

EDLA

ND M

OBILE

LAND

MOB

ILELA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILEFIX

EDMO

BILE

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

FIXED

FIXED

BRO

ADCA

ST

LAND

MOB

ILELA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

LAND

MOB

ILE

METE

OROL

OGICA

LAID

S

FXSp

ace r

es.

Radio

Ast

E-Ex

pl Sa

tFIX

EDMO

BILE*

*MO

BILE

SATE

LLITE

(S-E

)RA

DIODE

TERM

INATIO

N SAT

. (S-E)

Radio

locatio

nMO

BILE

FIXED

Amate

urRa

dioloc

ation

AMAT

EUR

FIXED

MOBIL

E

B-SA

TFX

MOB

Fixed

Mobil

eRa

dioloc

ation

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

N

MOBIL

E **

Fixed

(TLM

)LA

ND M

OBILE

FIXED

(TLM

)LA

ND M

OBILE

(TLM

)FIX

ED-SA

T

(S-E)

FIXED

(TLM

)MO

BILE

MOBIL

E SAT

.(Sp

ace to

Earth)

Mobil

e **

MOBIL

E**

FIXED

MOBIL

E

MOBI

LE SA

TELL

ITE (E

-S)

SPAC

E OP

.(E-

S)(s-s

)EAR

TH EX

PL.SAT

. (E-S)(

s-s)SP

ACE

RES.

(E-S)(

s-s)

FX.

MOB.

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

Mobil

e

R- LO

C.

BCST

-SAT

ELLIT

EFi

xed

Radio

-loc

ation

B-SA

TR-

LOC.

FXMO

BFix

edMo

bile

Radio

locati

onFIX

EDMO

BILE*

*Am

ateur

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

N

SPAC

E RES

..(S-E

)

MOBIL

EFIX

ED MOBI

LE SA

TELL

ITE (S

-E)

MARI

TIME

MOB

ILE

Mobil

e FIXED

FIXED

BRO

ADCA

STMO

BILE

FIXED

MOBIL

E SAT

ELLIT

E (E-

S)

FIXED

F

IXED

MARI

TIME

MOB

ILE

F

IXED

FIXED

MOBIL

E**

FIXED

MOBIL

E**

FIXED

SAT

(S-E

)AE

RO.

RADI

ONAV

.

FIXED

SATE

LLITE

(E-S)

Amate

ur- sa

t (s-e)

Amate

urMO

BILE

FIXE

D SA

T(E-

S)

FIXE

DFIX

ED S

ATEL

LITE

(S-E)(

E-S)

FIXED

FIXED

SAT

(E-S)

MOBI

LE

Radio

-loc

ation

RADIO

-LO

CATIO

NFI

XE

D S

AT.(E

-S)

Mobil

e**

Fixe

dMo

bile

FX S

AT.(E

-S)L M

Sat(E

-S)

AERO

RAD

IONA

VFI

XED

SAT

(E-S

)AE

RONA

UTICA

L RAD

IONA

VIGAT

ION

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NSp

ace

Res.(

act.)

RADI

OLOC

ATIO

NRa

dioloc

ation

Radio

loc.

RADIO

LOC.

Earth

Exp

l Sat

Spac

e Re

s.Ra

dioloc

ation

BCST

SAT

.

FIXE

DFIX

ED S

ATEL

LITE

(S-E)

FIXE

D SA

TELL

ITE

(S-E

)EA

RTH

EXPL

. SAT

.FX

SAT

(S-E

)SP

ACE

RES.

FIXE

D SA

TELL

ITE

(S-E

)FI

XED

SATE

LLIT

E (S

-E)

FIXE

D SA

TELL

ITE

(S-E

)MO

BILE

SAT.

(S-E)

FX S

AT (S

-E)

MOBI

LE S

ATEL

LITE

(S-E

)FX

SAT

(S-E

)ST

D FR

EQ. &

TIME

MOBIL

E SA

T (S-E

)EA

RTH

EXPL

. SAT

.MO

BILE

FIXE

DSP

ACE

RES. FI

XED

MOBI

LEMO

BILE

**FI

XED

EART

H EX

PL. S

AT.

FIXE

DMO

BILE*

*RA

D.AS

TSP

ACE

RES.

FIXE

DMO

BILE

INTER

-SATE

LLITE

FIXE

D

RADIO

AST

RONO

MYSP

ACE

RES.

(Pas

sive)

AMAT

EUR

AMAT

EUR S

ATEL

LITE

Radio

-loc

ation

Amate

urRA

DIO-

LOCA

TION

Earth

Exp

l.Sa

tellit

e(A

ctive

)

FIXE

D

INTER

-SATE

LLITE

RADIO

NAVIG

ATION

RADIO

LOCA

TION

SA

TELLI

TE (E-

S)INT

ER-SA

TELL

ITE

FIXE

DSA

TELL

ITE

(E-S

)RA

DIONA

VIGAT

ION

FIXE

DSA

TELL

ITE

(E-S

)FI

XED

MOBIL

E SAT

ELLIT

E (E-S

)FI

XED

SATE

LLIT

E (E

-S)

MOBI

LEFI

XED

Earth

Ex

plorat

ionSa

tellite

(S-

S)

std fre

q &

time

e-e-sa

t (s-s

)MO

BILE

FIXE

D e

-e-sa

tMO

BILE

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH (d

eep s

pace

)RA

DION

AVIG

ATIO

NIN

TER-

SAT

SPAC

E RE

S.

FIXE

DMO

BILE

SPAC

E RE

SEAR

CH(sp

ace-

to-Ea

rth)

SPAC

ERE

S.

FIXE

DSA

T. (

S-E)

MOBI

LEFI

XED

FIXE

D-SA

TELL

ITE

MOBIL

EFI

XED

FIXE

DSA

TELL

ITE

MOBI

LESA

T.FI

XED

SAT

MOBI

LESA

T.EA

RTH

EXPL

SAT

(E-S)

Earth

Expl.

Sat (s

- e)

SPAC

E R

ES. (E

-S) FX-S

AT(S

-E)

FIXED

MOBIL

EBR

OAD-

CAST

ING

BCST

SAT.

RADIO

ASTR

ONOM

YFI

XED

MOBI

LE**

FIXE

DSA

TELL

ITE (

E-S)

MOBI

LESA

TELL

ITE (

E-S)

FIXE

DSA

TELL

ITE (

E-S)

MOBI

LERA

DION

AV.

SATE

LLIT

EFI

XED

MOBI

LEMO

B. SA

T(E-S

)RA

DION

AV.S

AT.

MOBI

LESA

T (E

-S).

FIXE

DMO

BILE

FXSA

T(E-

S)

MOBI

LEFI

XED

INTE

R- S

ATEA

RTH

EXPL

-SAT

(Pa

ssive

)SP

ACE

RES.

INTE

R- S

ATSP

ACE

RES.

EART

H-ES

INTE

R- S

ATEA

RTH-

ESSP

ACE

RES.

MOBI

LEFI

XED

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATIO

NSA

T. (Pa

ssive

)SP

ACE

RES

.MO

BILE

FIXE

DIN

TER

- SAT

FIXE

DMO

BILE

INTER

-SA

TRA

DIO-

LOC.

MOBI

LEFI

XED

EART

HEX

PLOR

ATION

SAT. (

Passi

ve)

MOBIL

EFI

XED

INTER

-SA

TELL

ITEFI

XED

MOBI

LE**

MOBI

LE**

INTER

-SA

TELL

ITE

MOBI

LEINT

ER-

SATE

LLITE

RADI

OLOC

.Am

ateur Am

ateur

Sat.

Amate

urRA

DIOL

OC.

AMAT

EUR

SAT

AMAT

EUR

RADI

OLOC

.

SPAC

ERE

SEAR

CH(Pa

ssive)

EART

HEX

PL SA

T.(Pa

ssive)

FIXE

DMO

BILE

INTER

-SA

TELL

ITESP

ACE

RESE

ARCH

(Passi

ve)

EART

HEX

PL SA

T.(Pa

ssive)

Amatu

erFI

XED

MO-

BILE

INTER

-SA

T.SP

ACE

RES.

E A R T

H EX

PL . SA

T

INTER

-SA

TELL

ITE

INTER

-SAT.

INTER

-SAT.

MOBIL

EFIX

ED

FX-S

AT (S

- E)

BCST

- SAT

.B-

SAT.

MOB*

*FX

-SAT

SPAC

E RE

SEAR

CH

SPAC

ERE

S..

This chart is a graphic single-point-in-time portrayal of the Table of Frequency Allocations used by theFCC and NTIA. As such, it does not completely reflect all aspects, i.e., footnotes and recent changesmade to the Table of Frequency Allocations. Therefore, for complete information, users should consult theTable to determine the current status of U.S. allocations.

Page 75: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Spectrum  policies  

•  There’s  no  more  open  space  •  Increase  efficiency  

– modulaAon  –  narrow-­‐banding  –  analog  à  digital  à  packet  –  special  purpose  à  general  purpose  

•  Increase  spaAal  re-­‐use  •  No  good  research  data  on  spectrum  usage  and  possibiliAes  

Page 76: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

US  spectrum  approaches  

•  Narrow-­‐banding  by  January  1,  2013  – 150-­‐512  MHz  band:  25  kHz  à  12.5  kHz  or  befer  

•  White  spaces  in  TV  band  (512  –  692  MHz)  – query  database  for  incumbents  – 10  database  operators  – space  mostly  available  in  rural  areas  

•  IncenAve  aucAons  – only  about  10%  use  over-­‐the-­‐air  TV  – TV  channels  à  data  

Page 77: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Challenges  for  research  

Page 78: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  grand  (real-­‐world)  challenges  

•  GeIng  from  60  to  95%  broadband  usage  &  coverage  –  cost,  societal  issues  

•  Spectrum  challenges  –  availability,  fragmentaAon,  co-­‐existence  

•  Bandwidth  challenges  – QoS  does  not  help  (much)  

•  allows  VoIP  at  90%  vs.  60%  load    –  video  compression  not  quite  maxed  out  

•  MPEG-­‐2  à  H.264  got  us  factor  2  à  H.265  

Page 79: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  grand  (real  world)  challenges  

•  Understanding  privacy  – vague  concepAons  of  harms  &  risks  – see  Google,  Apple,  …  

•  The  role  of  compeAAon  in  a  natural  monopoly  world  

•  How  to  make  research  relevant  – not  obvious  which  results  in  the  last  10  years  have  had  major  impact  on  pracAce  

Page 80: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

The  not-­‐so-­‐grand  challenges  

•  Sensor  networks  •  QoS  •  è  90-­‐10  problems  (=  90%  of  soluAon  with  10%  of  the  effort)  

Page 81: Ataleoftwonetworks–network neutralityandothertopicshgs/papers/2011/2011-internet... · 2011. 7. 28. · 56.0 3.9 38.3 56.0 5.1 37.0 57.0 40.5 55.0 41.2 54.6 3.2 39.9 56.0 4.7 37.7

Conclusion  

•  Time  of  transiAon,  not  innovaAon  •  Industry  moving  from  start-­‐up  to  infrastructure  commodity  

•  Cannot  assume  that  technology  will  force  posiAve  outcomes  

–  interplay  of  economics,  regulaAon,  technology  •  Have  limited  insights  into  alternaAves  

– what  can  we  contribute?