atlam full edited
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
1/13
1
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
BKAL 3063 INTEGRATED CASE STUDY
FIRST SEMESTER 2013/2014 (A131)
LECTURE:
Pn. NORAZA BT MAT UDIN
CASE 7: SAP for ATLAM
EXPIRE: 8 December2013 (Before 10 a.m.)
GROUP A (7)
NAME MATRIC NO
MARISA BT MUSRIL
GOH ING MIN
ELIZABETH ESTONIA ANAK JONIC
195468
205438
207727
NURLIYANA BT ZAINUL ABIDIN
WONG ZI XIN
207788
207877
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
2/13
2
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3
2.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 3
2.1 ISSUES ............................................................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 Implementation of SAP system ................................................................................. 3
2.1.2 Resistance to change .................................................................................................. 4
2.1.3 Conflict between top management ............................................................................. 4
2.1.4 Termination of Mr. Lim ............................................................................................. 5
2.2 ANALYSIS OF FEASIBILITY STUDY ......................................................................... 5
2.2.1 Economic Feasibility ................................................................................................. 5
2.2.2 Operational Feasibility ............................................................................................... 7
2.2.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................................. 7
2.2.4 Schedule Feasibility ................................................................................................... 8
2.2.5 Legal and Contractual feasibility ............................................................................... 9
2.2.6 Political Feasibility .................................................................................................... 9
2.3 SAP vs ACCPAC ............................................................................................................. 9
3.0 RECOMENDATION ......................................................................................................... 10
3.1 Resistance to Change ...................................................................................................... 10
3.2 Conflict Management ..................................................................................................... 11
3.3 Termination of Mr Lim ................................................................................................... 12
4.0 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 13
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
3/13
3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Akademi Teknikal Laut Malaysia (ATLAM) was establish on 15 August 1981. Their
vision was to be a leader in maritime education and training, where their mission was to
facilitate value added learning via a conducive environment and provide excellent services to
its clients. Before privatization on 1 January 1997, ATLAM had been in a very poor state. The
management of ATLAM was a wholly owned organization of MICT Berhad. ATLAM relied
on a customized single-user system where the system cannot produce financial reports.
Therefore, they had been asked to upgrade its accounting system with the PETRA group-wide
SAP (Systems, Applications, and Products) system. Zulkifli Osman, the Finance Manager,
was responsible to manage this project. The new system should be ready by 1 April 2002.
However, there are some issue arises regarding the implementation of new system (SAP
system). Some of the project team members, Lim and Gopal, not agree with SAP
implementation. Lim was having conflict on opinion with Zulkifli when discussing matter of
SAP system in ATLAM. Time also limited to prepare to replace the old system with SAP
system. In addition, change in system/technology will need change in work processes, culture,
and habits. This issues lead Zulkifli took action by terminating Lim from the project team.
Does Zulkifli action reasonable? What should he do regarding this issue/matter?
2.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
2.1 ISSUES
2.1.1 Implementation of SAP system
Based on the case study, ATLAM need to upgrade its accounting system and the
Finance Manager, Mr. Zulkifli Osman decided to implement new accounting system called
SAP. But somehow, he had to reach an agreement with other top management and this
decision had leaded them to some arguments about implementing SAP for the company. First
of all, the argument is about the cost of implementing the SAP system. Compared to
ACCPAC system, the cost of implementing SAP is higher and it might affect the company
financial and non-financial information and their strategic implications in the long-run.
Second argument is the annual license fee as well as the security for the system. For the
internal control and their audit purposes, they need to allocate one ID per user. This can be
related to the security for the system too. In order to access the system, user must have ID to
access it. Therefore, it is going to cost them a lot. In this situation, its impossible for ATLAM
to bear the costs since ATLAMs cash flow as at December 2001 was at a deficit. The third
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
4/13
4
argument is about the time constraint issue. Due to the time constraint, ATLAM need to
implement SAP as soon as possible since the decision to upgrade the accounting system has
been made. In addition, to implement the SAP for the accounting system has brought another
argument which is the department will have an issue on the equipment such as lack of PCs
and space availability for the staff to practical the new system. Hence, all these arguments
need to be solved in order to implement SAP for the accounting system.
2.1.2 Resistance to change
The next major issue in this case is staff resistant to change from the old system to
SAP system. This resistant showed by Mr. Lim, the User Representative, who highlighted
how difficult it was for the staff to adapt and get used to the new system. Lim also showed
aggression and anger towards Mr. Zulkifli in meeting such a sign and symptom of an adverse
reaction to change. In addition, ATLAM is a government agency that had been through a
privatization on 1 January 1997, due to that; the staffs have a very strong character and quite
conservative. Some of the staff had never used computer before, so they are reluctant to learn
new things in the work place, they just want to do their job like they did for the past few years.
Their minds are conservative enough to resist change in work process, culture and habits that
some of the staff might refuse to accept SAP implementation. Another concern is they afraid
they might lose their job based on their ATLAM privatization experience that lead to cut offsome of the positions.
2.1.3 Conflict between top management
We could found out that in the project team, there are some issues regarding to the top
management behavior among them. There been a lot of issues rises in the meetings from Mr.
Lim, the User Representative and followed by Mr. Gopal, the User Project Manager
concerning to the implementation of SAP for the accounting system. The conflict happens
when they are trying to disagree with the other top management decisions for applying SAP
into the system by listing out the consequences of SAP to the company. They brought many
issues on the meetings that include the company capabilities on implementing SAP. All these
meetings bring a lot of tense to all the top management. Thus, in order to implement SAP for
the accounting system, they have to reach an agreement between them and work as a project
team to overcome the problems and issues raised.
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
5/13
5
2.1.4 Termination of Mr. Lim
The climax of all these issues has ended up in the termination of Mr. Lim from the
project team by Mr. Zulkifli. However, a small discussion with Mr. Kamal after the second
meeting has made a great impact on Mr. Zulkifli. He started to question himself on his action
whether it was right to terminate Mr. Lim or not. Well, based on the situation in this case
study, we came to a conclusion that Mr. Lims termination was not the right thing to do. This
is because Mr. Kamal has highlighted that Mr. Lim is very experienced and also raise up lots
of contrast ideas regarding the implementation of SAP system at ATLAM. However, his
comments were based on the benefits of company and concern on his fellow colleagues. He
was trying to defend his stands from end- user perspective and was not aiming to
underestimate SAPs benefits. Mr. Lim was defending his arguments based on cost benefit
analysis as via implementing SAP the company will be spending out more money. In contrast,
during the meetings were held, Mr. Zulkifli saw Mr. Lim as a threat as he wasnt really
supporting Mr. Zulkiflis idea to implement SAP system in their firm as soon as possible due
to the pressure from the higher management. Mr. Zulkifli also thought that Mr. Lim was
trying to influence other colleagues, (Mr. Gopal, for instance) by his ideas.
2.2 ANALYSIS OF FEASIBILITY STUDY
Feasibility study is an evaluation and analysis of the potential of a proposed projectwhich is based on extensive investigation and research to support the process of decision
making. There are some feasibility to assess and considered in a number of area for the SAP
project, like economic feasibility, operational feasibility, technical feasibility, schedules
feasibility, legal and contractual feasibility, and political feasibility.
2.2.1 Economic Feasibility
Economic feasibility refers to the financial viability for ATLAM to implement the SAP
project. For example, ATLAM may use Cost- Benefit analysis to access the economic
feasibility like initial investment, after tax cash flow for Years 1 through 6, payback period,
net present value, and internal rate of return.
i. Initial InvestmentInitial investment or initial outlay refers to the cash outflow at the start of a project or
investment. For example the cash outflow for start the SAP project. The initial outlay for
the project is as below. By included the initial outlay of the project will help us to identify
whether the project is profitable or not.
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
6/13
6
Initial Outlay
Hardware RM2,000,000
Software license RM1,000,000
Training cost RM1,271,550
Customisation cost RM72,840
Total initial outlay RM4,344,390
ii. After- tax cash flowThe following is the cash flow after tax for ATLAM from Year 1 until Year 6.
The calculation below shows that the project was creating more cost saving than the
cost expense each year from Year 1 until Year 6. Besides, even after consider a 25%
tax for each of the years, the total cost saving each still enough to cover the total cost
incurred in the year. From the calculation, we can also sees that net saving after tax is
increasing each year start from Year 1 until Year 6. Although we can make a summary
that invest in SAP create more benefit than cost to ATLAM, but the cash flow
calculation did not consider any of the unquantifiable cost and benefit in the analysis.
iii. Net Present ValueNet present value refers to the total of each year net cash flows discounted to present value
for recognize their time value of money. The calculation for the net present value for the
ATLAMs SAP project cash flow is as below.
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
7/13
7
iv. Payback PeriodPayback period refers to the period of time that ATLAM need to take for the net cash
flow from a project to equal its initial investment to the project.
Based from the calculation in the net present value and the initial outlay, the period of
time need for ATLAMs discounted cash flow to cover its initial outlay are as below.
Payback Period=
2.2.2 Operational Feasibility
Operational feasibility refers to the assessment of how a proposed system solves
business problems or takes advantages of opportunities with the new system. It could assess
whether the new implement SAP system can help ATLAMs operation more effective and
efficient. Based on Lims argument, the new SAP system is very likely to affect the staffs
working process, culture, and habits. Besides, staff resistance to change of their working
culture and habits will expose the project to the risk of failure. So ATLAM need to think of
the ways to handle this issue.
2.2.3 Technical Feasibility
Technical feasibility refers to the ability of the ATLAM to develop and implement the
SAP system. This means ATLAM has capability of technical resources to utilize SAP system.
Before ATLAM implement the project, they need to access the availability of a
knowledgeable and experience project manager to lead the SAP project. Besides, that
ATLAM also need to ensure the information technology team is well knowledge enough to
develop the system. This was to ensure the quality of the developed SAP system and reduce
the risk of system break down or system failure.
Far apart from the assessment of availability of the technical staff to develop the new
system, ATLAM also need to ensure the availability of knowledgeable and experience IT
staff to maintain the SAP system.
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
8/13
8
This analysis should include an assessment of the technical risk on SAP System that is
depending on four primary factors: project size, project structure, ATLAM development
groups experience with similar system, and user groups experience with SAP System
development projects and the application area.
i. Project SizeThis project is reasonably large project for ATLAM, to be said, the larger the size of
the projects, the riskier the project is. This is because the project will impacted on entire
ATLAM organizations. Almost 20 departments in ATLAM will involved, it will give high
stress to project team members which consists of five persons (Sani as Project Manager,
Gopal as User Project Manager, Lim as User Representative, Kamal as Functional Analysts
and Zulkifli as Finance Manager) to finish the project in shorter duration time (second weeks
of February until fourth weeks of March).
ii. Project StructureThe requirements for SAP System project is highly structured and well define have a
lower risk. In fact, under the SAP system, it will provide an applicable system to ATLAM and
to all companies within the PETRA group. Even though there are user representative (Lim)
whose refuse to carry on the implementation of SAP system, it is still under control as the
ATLAM management have highly commitment through the system.
iii. Development group and User groupThe projects have a high risk as the development group and user group has low
familiarity with the application area of SAP System. However, conducting some training will
reduce the risk. Medium risk of technical assessment of SAP project should be considered as
acceptable to ATLAM as refusing to take any risk will cause ATLAM couldnt make the
major breakthroughs in innovative uses of systems.
By using those project risk assessment factors to access the technical risk level of SAP
System, the result drawn that SAP System project has a medium risk.
2.2.4 Schedule Feasibility
In schedule feasibility study, ATLAM is required to assess time frame and project
completion dates. For example, in the conversation in the first meeting on 22 January 2002,the SAP system should be ready for use in 1 April 2002. This means, the project team have
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
9/13
9
less than six month times to develop the project. Besides, the project team also needs to
develop a project task schedule for the project members to identify project tasks sequence and
project task that can be run parallel to avoid delay.
2.2.5 Legal and Contractual feasibility
Legal and contractual feasibility refers to the assessment of legal and contractual
ramifications of the new system. For example, when developing the SAP system, ATLAM
need to assess the possibility of legal actions taken towards ATLAM due to copyright offence.
2.2.6 Political Feasibility
Political feasibility refers to the assessment of key stakeholders opinion in
organization towards the new developed system. For example, ATLAM need to assess the
acceptability of the new SAP system in the staff, as they are the user for the system. Besides,
the project team needs to find the ways to convicts the staffs to not resistance on the new
system. Perhaps the team may explain how implementation of SAP can helps to ease the
system users job and increased the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization.
2.3 SAP vs ACCPAC
Advantages:
SAP ACCPAC
i) Focus on process, not on functions i) Identical user interface
ii) Individual solutions ii) Data processing
iii) Enhance productivity iii) Easy to use and customize
iv) Efficient work environment
v) Real time information
vi) Global integration
Disadvantages:
SAP ACCPAC
i) High cost i) Technical difficulties
ii) Complexity ii) Integration setbacks
iii) Risk of project failure iii) Differences in programs
iv) Inflexibility
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
10/13
10
3.0 RECOMENDATION
3.1 Resistance to Change
There are some of the approaches that ATLAM may take to deal with the resistance to
change. According to Kotter and Schlesinger, there are six approaches that ATLAM may
choose to overcome the staffs resistance to change.
i. ParticipationIn this approach, the aim was to involve employee to participate in the project
by allowing them to input some ideas in decision making process. For example,
ATLAM may involve its end use for the SAP system by allowing them to design the
systems interface. By this ATLAMs staff will be more committed to implement thechange as the interface designed according to their requirements ease them to fit in the
change. But, the shortcoming of this approach is it might take a longer time for
ATLAM to develop the SAP system.
ii. Education and communicationThis approach was relies upon the hopeful belief that communication about the
benefits of change to employee will result in their acceptance of the need to exercise
the change. For example, ATLAM may explain how the implementation of new SAP
system can lighten the staffs workload and improve their efficiency. But this
approach also has the shortcoming of time consuming when the persuasion involved
many staffs.
iii. Power or coercionThis approach was aim to solve the resistance to change faster by using the
power owned by initiator to force the staff to accept the change. For example,
ATLAM may compulsory the staff to implement change of SAP system under the
CEOs order. But this approach comes with a weakness as people might get angry
with the initiators.
iv. Facilitation and supportIn this approach, employees may need to be counselled to help them overcome
their fear and anxieties about the change. So ATLAM may counsel their staff whythey are resistance to accept the change of SAP system. This approach might be the
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
11/13
11
best approach to overcome the resistance to change due to the adjustment issues, but it
was risky as the staff might still resist to change after the larger amount of time and
cost has consume.
v. NegotiationNegotiation refers to the approach to meet the win-win situation between two
parties. ATLAM may use this approach to ask the staff resist to accept SAP system by
bargaining with the company to meet a compromise and agreement between two
parties. But this approach can be time consuming when they cannot reach an
agreement in a meeting.
vi. Manipulation and cooptationThis approach should be the last choice of approach to overcome the resistance
to change when other approach wont work and too costly. Although this approach can
be relatively quick and inexpensive solution to resistance, but can lead to future
problems if the staff found out they have been manipulated.
3.2 Conflict Management
Conflict management is vital to solve the conflict between the project team members.
This is because we cannot avoid conflict in the process of forming a team. Conflict refers tothe process that begin when you perceive that someone has frustrated or is about to frustrate a
major concern of yours.
One of the methods to resolving conflict is by mediate the conflict. In this approach,
the project manager takes a direct interest in the conflict between two parties and seeks to find
a solution to the conflict. The project manager may either employ defusion or confrontation
tactics in negotiating a solution.
In defusion tactics, the project manager is less concern about the source of conflict
than the mutually acceptable solution. Whereas confrontation tactics more concern about
finding the source of conflict. This tactic is more emotional, time intensive, and in the short
term, may actually make the conflict worse as both parties stand firm with their opinion. But
this tactic is more effective in a long run as it seek to determine the causes of conflict so they
can be corrected. Since there are short of time in for ATLAM to solve the conflict between
Mr Lim and Zulkifli, so the project manager is advice to use the defusion tactic to solve the
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
12/13
12
conflict. The project manager may use the phrase such as We are all on the same team here
to demonstrate the desire to defuse the conflict without plumbing its underlying source.
Besides, that Mr Lim is the representative of the user that reflects the systems users
opinion so the team should not easily terminate him.
3.3 Termination of Mr Lim
Mr. Zulkifli should not withdraw Mr. Lim from the SAP project team. Although Mr.
Lim raises many issues during the meetings about the implementation of SAP, however, for
some extent, the issues been raises by Mr. Lim are also helping the project team to have a
better consideration about the implementation of SAP in ATLAM. From the issues raised, the
project team will know better about the problems that may occur while implementing the SAP
system in ATLAM. This will help the project team to have a strategy to avoid the problems to
occur or minimize the impact brought by those problems. This will definitely help in
smoothing the implement process of SAP in ATLAM. Besides, the withdrawal of Mr. Lim
from the project team will also give constrain to the project team in implementing the SAP
system. This is due to there are possibility that the view of Mr. Lim gives influence to the
employee and thus the uncooporation of the employee will harden the implementing process
of SAP in ATLAM.
Besides, since another motive of Mr. Zulkufli to implement the SAP system in
ATLAM is to link the system of ATLAM to its parent companys system, PETRANET to
match the group report structure. Thus, to reduce the capital fund in investing SAP system in
ATLAM, Mr. Zulkifli can discuss with the parent company to subsidise ATLAM in
implementing SAP system. The most strong point to pursue the parent company to subsidise
ATLAM in implementing the SAP system is that after the implementation, the report of
ATLAM will match with the parent companys reportand this will ease the parent company
in preparing consolidated reports. Besides, as the parent company was successfully implement
SAP system, if ATLAM get subsidiary from the parent company, the expenses on hire the
experts to implement SAP can be eliminated as the parent company can provide this resource
to ATLAM. This will also increase the feasibility of the SAP implementation in ATLAM.
-
8/13/2019 ATLAM Full Edited
13/13
13
4.0 CONCLUSION
After we go through the analysis and evaluation on SAP system, we suggest that ATLAM
continue their plan to implement the system. Even though there are some issues andconstraints to implementing SAP system at the beginning, the system would be worthwhile
implementing as it would benefit for ATLAM in the future. Of course in order to gain
something from the system in the future we need to sacrifice or take any risks arises. Based on
the Cost-Benefit analysis to access the economic feasibility, we can see that the net saving
after tax is increasing each year from Year 1 until Year6. The payback period need for
ATLAMs discounted cash flow to cover its initial outlay was 3 years and 6 months.
Therefore, ATLAM needs to continue implement SAP system no matter what. Regarding
time constraint issue, ATLAM can use Gantt chart as a tool to monitor the project activities. It
allows the project team to be able to focus on the project status at any date during the
projects development.There are six approaches that ATLAM may choose to overcome the
staffs resistance to change. They are participation, education and communication,
power/coercion, facilitation and support, negotiation, and manipulation and co-optation.
Finally, Mr Zulkifli should not terminate Mr Lim from the project team just because they
having different opinion. Although Mr Lim raises many issues during the meetings, its was
for the good of the organisation. His ideas should have been taken into consideration as hes
very experienced and knew what he was doing. Therefore, Mr Zulkifli should reconsider his
action of terminating Mr Lim. This is because with Mr Lim presence, he could help in
smoothing the implementation process of SAP system in ATLAM. As conclusion, good
teamwork and information system would bring bright future for ATLAM.