atlas fp tracker plans

8
ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS Steve Watts School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester defined design in the FP420 Design Report on the FE-I3 ATLAS Pixel Readout chip. n suitable for 220 but needs roughly double the number of rs. Layout is more difficult and power dissipation is higher. ion level close to beam is very high. Implications for the ut chip. Sensor is good to 1-2 10 16 charged hadrons cm -2 300-600 MRad nce – New Design for the Tracker…… R&D is linked to 3D sensor developments for IBL a

Upload: trey

Post on 05-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS. Steve Watts School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester. Well defined design in the FP420 Design Report Based on the FE-I3 ATLAS Pixel Readout chip. Design suitable for 220 but needs roughly double the number of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS

ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS

Steve WattsSchool of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of Manchester

• Well defined design in the FP420 Design Report Based on the FE-I3 ATLAS Pixel Readout chip.

• Design suitable for 220 but needs roughly double the number of sensors. Layout is more difficult and power dissipation is higher.

• Radiation level close to beam is very high. Implications for the readout chip. Sensor is good to 1-2 1016 charged hadrons cm-2 300-600 MRad

Consequence – New Design for the Tracker…… R&D is linked to 3D sensor developments for IBL and SLHC

Page 2: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS

220 m420 m

Page 3: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS

FE-I3 Lifetime issue 1015 charged particles per cm2 or ~30 MradSOLUTION A 3D sensor safe to 1-2 1016 charged hadrons per cm2

Dose highest in very narrow vertical band.

Move sensors up and down by 1-2 mm to even out the dose

Trick used with CCDs in NA32. Additional specification for mechanical design.Would give a factor 3.

Page 4: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS

• New FE-I4– Pixel size = 250 x 50 µm2

– Pixels = 80 x 336– Technology = 0.13µm– Power = 0.5 W/cm2

• FE-I4 Design Status– Contribution from 5 laboratories.– Main blocks MPW submitted in Spring

2008.– Full FE-I4 Review: 2/3/3009– Submission in Summer 2009

– Expect IBL modules late 2010

7.6mm

8mm active

2.8mm

FE-I3 74%

20.2mm

active16.8mm

~2mm

~200μm

FE-I4 ~89%

Char

tere

d re

ticul

e (2

4 x

32) IBM

retic

ule

~19 mm

FE-I3 - lifetime issueSolution B

Use FE-I4. Factor 5 more radiation tolerant than FE-I3. For IBL projectPlus - better matched to track hit distribution at 220. - Common module design for 220 and 420 - 2 x Fe-I4 each plane

Page 5: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS
Page 6: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS
Page 7: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS

NOTE: IMPROVED Y-Measurement. Consequence for physics ???NOTE2: Assumes hits distribution stable with time…..

Page 8: ATLAS FP  TRACKER PLANS

FE-I3 versus FE-I4

• FE-I3 run had very poor yield. There will be another run in 2010.

• FE-I4 First run will produce chips in summer/Autumn 2010

ASIC designs always take more than one iteration.

FE-I4 3D sensor is larger and thus yields will be lower.

Conclusion

FE-I4 baseline. There will be 3D/FE-I4 detectors developed for IBL.

Mechanics/electronics engineers to look at FE-I4 design.

FE-I4 - common 220/420 mechanics design