aua guidelines for imaging known or suspected ureteral calculi … · 2017. 9. 19. · aua...

47
AUA Guidelines for Imaging Known or Suspected Ureteral Calculi Michael Ferrandino, MD Assoc Professor of Urology Duke University Medical Center

Upload: others

Post on 28-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • AUA Guidelines for Imaging Known or Suspected Ureteral

    Calculi

    Michael Ferrandino, MD Assoc Professor of Urology

    Duke University Medical Center

  • • Justification for the Guidelines

    • Current Imaging Modalities

    • AUA Guidelines on the Imaging of Ureteral Calculi

    • Novel Imaging Techniques

    Imaging for Urolithiasis

  • Ureteral Calculus Detection

    Clinical Effectiveness Justification

    Clinical management per existing guidelines Consideration of performance characteristics of imaging modality Clinical effectiveness decision-tree diagrams integrate performance characteristics, risks and costs

  • • Evaluated current imaging modalities for: – Diagnostic accuracy for identifying

    ureteral calculi and/or hydronephrosis – Risks to patient- ie radiation exposure – Cost

    • Guidelines set out to balance these factors to come up with decision trees

    Imaging Guidelines Panel Considerations

  • • Computed Tomography (CT)

    • Ultrasound (US)

    • Plain abdominal radiography (KUB)

    • Intravenous pyelograms (IVP)

    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Current Imaging

  • Imaging For Stones Sensitivity and Specificty

    Imaging Technique Sensitivity Specificity

    Non-contrast Computed Tomography 95%-98% 96%-98%

    “Low Dose” CT 97% 95%

    Ultrasound Renal stones Ureteral Stones

    29%-81% 11%-93%

    82%-90%

    87%-100%

    Plain Radiography KUB IVP

    45%-58%

    85.2%

    69%-77%

    90.4%

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging 93%-100% 95%-100%

    Lipkin ME, Preminger GM. Clinical Urolithiasis 2012

  • Radiation Exposure

  • Increasing CT scans

    Brenner DJ and Hall EJ, NEJM 2007

    http://content.nejm.org/content/vol357/issue22/images/large/10f2.jpeg

  • Future Cancers from 2007 CT

    Berrington de Gonzales et al., Arch Int Med, 2009

    Estimated 29,000 Cancers related to CT scans performed in 2007

  • Effective Dose

    3.04 0.31

    3.93

    9.73

    0123456789

    10

    Renal StoneCT

    KUB IVP CT Urogram

    Effe

    ctiv

    e D

    ose

    (mSV

    )

    Imaging Study Neisius A, et al. J Urol 2013

    Renal ultrasound and MRI have no radiation exposure

  • • Meta-analysis of 7 studies evaluating NCCT with dose < 3 mSv (low dose)

    • Compared to standard dose CT (~10-12 mSv) – Pooled sensitiviy 97% (95-98%) – Pooled specificity 95% (92-97%)

    Low Dose CT Meta-analysis

    Nieman et al AJR 2008

  • BMI < 30 BMI > 30 Sensitivity 95% 50%

    Specificity 97% 89%

    Low Dose CT Obesity

    Polettti et al AJR 2007

    • Sensitivity and specificity for detecting ureteral stone affected by BMI:

  • AVERAGE COST – PROF AND TECH

    Imaging Ureteral Stones

    Chart1

    KUB

    KUB/Tomos

    Digital Tomos

    Bilat Sono

    IVP

    Stone CT

    CT Urogram

    Avg

    331

    611

    611

    882

    1130

    4449

    6613

    Sheet1

    Avg

    KUB331

    KUB/Tomos611

    Digital Tomos611

    Bilat Sono882

    IVP1130

    Stone CT4449

    CT Urogram6613

  • Imaging For Stones

    Diagnostic Accuracy

    Time to perform

    exam Radiation Exposure Cost

    NCCT +++ +++ + + Low dose NCCT

    +++ +++ ++ +

    Ultrasound ++ ++ +++ ++

    KUB + +++ ++ +++

    IVP ++ + + ++

    MRI ++ + +++ +

  • Specifically addresses imaging

    Initial presentation Observation / medical expulsive therapy Follow up imaging after treatment

    Clinical Effectiveness

    Decision Tree Diagrams

  • AUA Guidelines Imaging Ureteral Stone

    Initial Presentation Abdominal/Flank Pain

    BMI < 30 kg/m2

    Yes No

    Standard Protocol NCCT Low Dose NCCT

    KUB if stone not visible on CT Scout

  • Follow up after observation ± medical expulsive therapy

    AUA Guidelines Imaging Ureteral Stone

  • Radio-opaque Stone Symptomatic

    Yes No

    Passed Stone Renal Sono/KUB

    Yes No

    Renal Sono/ KUB

    No Imaging

  • Non radio-opaque Stone Symptomatic

    Yes No

    Passed Stone NCCT

    Yes No

    NCCT No Imaging

  • Follow up after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)

    AUA Guidelines Imaging Ureteral Stone

  • Post-SWL Radio-opaque Stone

    Yes No

    Renal Sono

    Yes No

    Imaging if symptoms

    NCCT

    Renal Sono/KUB

    Hydro

  • Follow up after ureteroscopy

    AUA Guidelines Imaging Ureteral Stone

  • Intact Stone Removal

    Symptomatic

    Yes No

    Renal sono CT Abdomen/Pelvis with Contrast

    Yes No

    No Further Imaging

    Hydro

    CT Abdomen/Pelvis with Contrast

  • Post-fragmentation Symptomatic

    Radio-opaque

    Yes No

    Low Dose NCCT Renal Sono/KUB

  • Post-fragmentation Asymptomatic

    Radio-opaque

    Yes No

    Renal Sono Renal Sono/KUB

    Hydro

    Low Dose NCCT

  • • High sensitivity and specificity

    • Minimal or no radiation exposure

    • Low cost

    • Quickly performed

    Imaging For Stones Ideal study would:

  • Digital Tomosynthesis (DT)

    Imaging For Stones New Imaging Techniques

  • • Acquire a series of projections during a single sweep of the X-ray tube over limited angle

    • Software reformats to provide several high resolution “slice” images at different depths

    • Removes overlying structures

    Digital Tomosynthesis

  • Digital Tomosynthesis

    Requires digital flat panel detector and image reconstruction software

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Ureteral Stone

  • Digital Tomosynthesis

    Radiation Exposure

    KUB w/ Tomograms

    Digital Tomosynthesis

    Renal Stone CT

    Effective Dose (mSv) 3.93 0.85 3.04

    Standard KUB dose ranges from 0.3-0.6 mSv

    Neisius A, et al. Urology 2014

  • Digital Tomosynthesis

    Location Dependent Sensitivity

    Mermuys K, et al. AJR 2010

    Kidney Stones Ureteral Stones Digital Radiography 24% 38% Digital Tomosynthesis 66% 29%

    Digital tomosynthesis shows promise for the detection and follow up of renal stones

  • • Non-contrast CT is still the gold standard imaging study for the evaluation of urolithiasis

    • Low-dose protocol NCCT should be first line imaging study in non-obese patients

    Conclusion

  • • Renal sono/KUB still play large role in the imaging of ureteral stone and should be used when clinically indicated

    • Digital tomosynthesis may help improve sensitivity/specificity of KUB with minimal increase in radiation

    Conclusion

    AUA Guidelines for Imaging Known or Suspected Ureteral CalculiSlide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Increasing CT scansFuture Cancers from �2007 CTSlide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Ureteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneUreteral StoneSlide Number 44Slide Number 45Slide Number 46Slide Number 47