audit of regulators electricity sector as example introduction how the regulator ‘regulates’ the...
TRANSCRIPT
Audit of Regulators
electricity sector as example
Introduction
How the regulator ‘regulates’ the sector
Auditing standard for ‘audit of regulator’
Example of ‘performance audit’ of a regulator
Powers under ‘DPC Act’ for audit of regulator
Introduction - Electricity sector in India- Regulators Service to be delivered or commodity; concurrent
1970s and 1980s – farmers, industry
Early 1990s – industry, affluent urban class
Financial situation of Electricity Boards
No further funding- World Bank- Arms Length
1993 Orissa – of all the States, why Orissa the first?
1998 Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Act
Other states – 2003 Electricity Act
Maharashtra – Dabhol (Enron)- transparency , litigation
How a regulator regulates electricity Sector
GENCO -1 GENCO-2 GENCO-3
TRANSCO
DISCO 1 DISCO 2 DISCO 3 DISCO 4
How a regulator regulates electricity Sector
Generation Companies – (long term 15 to 20 years)1 Competitive bidding Unit cost of power (MW- MWh)
2 Cost of setting of specified capacity of plant (1000 MW)
3 Fuel – Security of supply of fuel, cost of fuel
4 Operating costs – operating capacity ambience temp
5 other inputs – manpower, spares; Maintenance Cost
6 Demand variation 7 Cost of borrowing (rate of return)inflation, FE variation etc 8 Service conditions – penalties
Finally agreed uptake of power – fixed and variable payments
How a regulator regulates electricity Sector
Transmission Company – (medium term)1 Natural monopoly – utility already exists- run commercially
2 Bidders for expansion and operation
3 Capital investment for expansion, replacement of assets
4 Cost of borrowing (return on investment)
5 Cost of operation and maintenance
6 Conditions of supply – transmission security - penalties
7 Factor for performance – transmission losses
8 Efficiency gains as a profit incentive to the firm
Agreed payments to the firm – fixed and variable payments
How a regulator regulates electricity Sector
Distribution Companies – (medium term)1 Bidders for expansion and operation (even existing PSU)
2 Capital investment for expansion, replacement of assets
3 Cost of borrowing (return on investment)
4 Cost of operation and maintenance
5Supply Conditions- distribution security- N minus 1 power connections, complaints penalties
6 Factor for performance – distribution losses
7 Efficiency gains as a profit incentive to the firm
Tariff, billing, collection (remit & get paid) – payment to firms
Subsidy of the Government through regulator
Auditing Standard for Audit of Regulator
• INTOSAI Guidelines on Best Practice for the Audit of Economic Regulation is grouped under
• ISSAI 5200-5299 Guidelines on Privatization• Specific Standard for the purpose is ISSAI 5230 • It identifies 4 areas of regulator to be examined
Business of Regulation Supply of Services
Price of Service Developing Competition
ISSAI 5230 Audit of Regulator
They form the Audit Objectives for Audit of a Regulator
1.To what extent the Regulatory Body is equipped for “Business of Regulation”
2.How efficiently it enabled “Supply of Services”
3.How efficient it was in regulating the “Price of Service”
4.How efficient it was in “Developing Competition”
Case Study
Electricity Sector Regulatory Body
Sultanate of Oman
AO 1 to what extent the body is equipped for the Business of Regulation a. Regulatory framework
The context in which the regulator is
operating
Is it autonomous, semi-independent
b.Objectives, functions and power
Its objectives, functions and
powers within the framework
Power given to the body and the legal basis to
exercise those powers, decision making process,
information systems and internal control systems c.Impartiality and integrity
What rules and procedures have been
established to ensure that regulatory
functions are carried out impartially
Both the consumers and the suppliers have
to perceive that body is impartial
d.Technical competence
What steps taken to ensure that if has sufficiently competent staff,
access to expert advice to enable it to carry out its functions with
adequate knowledge of the regulated suppliers and the markets
within which they operate
What is the mix between external consultancy and in-house expertise
e. Information needs
Whether the regulator is able to obtain
sufficient reliable information about suppliers
to enable it to carry out its functions
efficiently and effectively
How does the regulator ensure that
information that flow is accurate (penalty),
how is the data validated. -would lead to
over /underestimation of costsf. Accountability and consultation
What steps the regulator has taken to assist
public and parliament scrutiny of its
decisions and actions including consultative
arrangements with interested parties having
due regard to the need to protect
commercial confidentiality where this can be
shown to be in the public interest
It is accountable to whom? Government,
Parliament or only public? How its
accountability is ensured> who scrutinizes
its decisions? To whom does it report to?
What is the cost benefit of the regulatory
body itself?
AO 2 How efficiently it enabled supply of services
a. Security of supply
Examine the arrangements which the regulator has put in place to ensure that suppliers provide at least the basic statutory services and that the consumers are compensated if failure of supply occur
Within the safety , environmental issues which are absolute, what is the performance of companies to provide the basic (expected) service and what is compensation in case of shortfall
b. Consumer access
Examine how the regulator has sought to secure consumer access to services and whether suppliers are prevented from discriminating unfairly between different groups of consumers
Any instances of lack of access to supply
c. Supplying vulnerable consumers
Examine how the regulator monitors whether suppliers comply with their statutory duties to provide access to vulnerable groups
Low cost scheme for those who cant afford, subsidy or cross subsidy
d. Service standards
What the regulator has done to establish minimum standards of service for customers to monitor the performance of suppliers and to secure improvement when there is shortfall
Service to the prescribed level and quality BenchmarkingIs it a licence condition
e. Dealing with customer complaints
Whether the regulator have set up a well publicized procedures to enable consumers (clients) complaints to be satisfactorily addressed
System of registering and addressing complaintsWhat about complaints from distribution companies against transmission and generation companiesCustomers/companies against distribution companies. Factoring agents
f. Environmental issues
How the regulator is discharging responsibilities it may have for checking that suppliers are meeting any obligations for the protection of the environment
Prior to construction of the plant Decommissioning , Emission standards , Damage to flora and fauna, Health of employees, Health of public
AO 3 How efficient it was in regulating the “Price of Service”
a. Controlling prices
Whether the regulator has implemented (or suggested) a well designed and transparent pricing regime in line with regulatory objectives
How do we know that amounts collected by distribution company’s is the maximum collectable revenue at the given tariffs and permissible distribution losses
b. Linking price to quality
Whether the regulator has sought to ensure that the price consumers are required to pay is matched by the quality of service
What was the promised flow supply and actual flow, what is the voltage, extent of interruption Mechanism to identify unnecessary costs and how to cut them without effecting service quality
c. Encouraging supplier efficiency
Whether regulator sought to encourage suppliers to reduce their costs and improve their efficiency
What measure were implemented to make companies improve operational efficiencyenergy audit (equipment and configuration)To what extent it resulted reduction in per unit cost
d. Suppliers financing costs
In setting the price controls whether the regulator examined the likely cost of suppliers raising capital (debt and equity) having regard to factors such as sources of finance, taxes on profit and interest in suppliers balance sheets
Does the regulator scrutinize the suppliers investment planIf suppliers are enjoying high returns, this may indicate weak competition
e. Investment
Whether the regulator is monitoring supplier investment, suppliers are fulfilling any investment requirements and undertakings and the investment is having the desired beneficial effects on consumers
What is the purpose for which return on investment and depreciation is allowed?Agreed level of investment and expansion, investment is well targeted and effective any penalties for not fulfilling it
AO 4 How efficient it was in “Developing Competition”
a. Reducing
monopoly and
market domination
Whether the regulator has the objective
of promoting competition in order to
reduce the monopoly and market
domination
Creating conditions
conducive to new entrants
Extent to which market was
liberalized
b. Promoting
consumer choice
What the regulator has done to assess
whether consumers have the scope to
change supplier; consumer has the
relevant information to make such
choice and effective arrangements are
there for consumers who want to
change
How can the consumer be
given choice in choosing an
alternative distributor
c. Combating anti-
competitive
practices
Whether the regulator seeks to identify
and deal promptly with alleged anti-
competitive practices
Mechanism to find it and
deal with it
Any instance and final
outcome
DPC ActSec-13 Sec-14 Sec-15
Audit of all expenditure
Audit of bodies, authorities substantially financed
specific purpose Grants loans to a body or authority
Sec- 16Sec-17
Audit of all receipts payable into consolidated fund
Audit of accounts of stores and stock
Sec-18 Sec-19 Sec-20
Authority to inspect any office, to ask for any records
Audit of Companies and Corporations
Audit of body or authority not entrusted under any law
• Section 20 (1) provides for audit of certain
bodies not covered under Section 19 or any
other law to be entrusted to C&AG by the
President/Governor (in consultation with
C&AG). Such audit is conducted within the
terms and conditions agreed upon between
C&AG and the concerned Government.
Chapter 8 Rule 79 of the regulations explains the expression ‘body’ or ‘authority’. It is a person or body exercising power or command vested in it by virtue of the Constitution or any law made by the legislature. The expression body means an aggregate of persons, whether incorporated, unincorporated, and includes institution or organisation set up as an autonomous organisation under a specific statute or as a society registered under Societies Registration Act 1860 or Indian Trusts Act, 1882 or any other statute, voluntary organisation, or non-government organisation, urban or rural local self Government institution, cooperative society or club etc.
• Section 20(2) provides for C&AG to propose
to President/Governor for audit of any such
entity, if C&AG is of opinion that such audit is
necessary in public interest because of
substantial investments in it or advances
made to that made to that body.
• Section 20(3) says such audit shall not be
entrusted to C&AG except where
President/Governor is satisfied that it is
expedient to do in public interest and after
giving a reasonable opportunity to the entity
to make representations on the proposal to
conduct of audit of that entity.
There can be several entities that do not fall under 14, 15 & 19. Section 20 providing for all other types of entities (structures of governance that could not be anticipated, to come up)
Substantial ‘investment or advances made’ would also mean ‘substantial powers’ given to regulator that have financial impact on the customers/citizens/environment/propriety
Arguments of Government, regulators and Planning Commission
Is there a need for performance Audit of Regulators in India?
Planning Commission Documents Regulators are coming up several sectors Roads, Ports, Airports, Railways, Coal, Posts A Ministry of Regulation under with DOPT A number of studies that indicate capture of
electricity regulators by different stakeholders Who would provide assurance to the Legislature
that regulators are doing a good job or not?