8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

1/9

MARY L

JANIS ZINK SARTUC CI, ET

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

2/9

MARYLJANIS ZINK SARTUC CI, ET

APPELLANTS

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

3/9

Recently, T-Mobile decinecessitating a separate utility eSuperintendent, through the MCagreement granting Com cast a utelecommun ications tower on ea

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

4/9

have an interest that is any differenhundreds of thousands of residentsno facts alleging that they would bAppellants are residents or parentsallegations to support the conclusio

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

5/9

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

6/9

3 .fhis appeal shouldAppellants' claim that they

granting utility easements to Comcor discuss the subject of "easemen

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

7/9

4.ppellants' argumseveral disjointed statements thaAppellants referred to Board Pocharge that the Policy "was violatransmission facilities" and that

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

8/9

review and approv al of Telecomm uniBoard m eetings, Respondent's Exhibi

The actions taken by the Co unapplicable law or policy. The Superinof the reasons for granting the u tility e

8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss

9/9