auto motion - home – iav automotive engineering€¦ · · 2015-09-01auto motion topics in this...
TRANSCRIPT
auto motion
Topics in this issue include:
New battery test bench in Chemnitz
New foot for crash-test dummies
20 years of e-vehicle development at IAV
Study on financing a recharging
infrastructure for e-vehicles
IAV Customer Magazine
Testing & Validation
Testing still essentialdespite increasing useof simulation
03/11
automotion | Editorial 3
Dear Reader
IAV’s getting a new face – and automotion a re-
freshingly contemporary layout. In redesigning
our brand appearance, we have given our
client newspaper a new look too. Our aim: to
make coverage presentation even more ap-
pealing while also giving you a more enjoyable
read. But without compromising on the high
quality of content you are accustomed to.
That speaks for itself.
Ever since 2002, automotion has been in-
forming you four times a year on IAV’s activi-
ties and exciting developments in automotive
engineering. A lot has happened in this time –
technology-wise and in our company: Be-
cause of the confidence you have shown in us,
we can now look back on ten years of strong
growth. This has made us one of today’s lead-
ing development partners to the internation-
al automotive industry.
This premium-provider claim naturally goes for
our customer newspaper too: We want to
give you, the reader, a clear thread that guides
you through the topics we cover in every issue.
This is why, from now on, automotion is ap-
pearing in magazine format.
We haven’t changed everything, of course –
what has shown to work well in the past will be
carried on in future too. This includes publica-
tion intervals: We will still be reporting four times
a year on developments that move us and the
automotive industry. And we won’t be chang-
ing our high quality and depth of coverage ei-
ther – this is something our editorial team of
proven experts will make sure of. And in future
too: We’ll be reporting on everything that will
play a part in shaping mass production to-
morrow and beyond.
We wish you some interesting reading.
Michael Schubert
President, CFO
IAV GmbH
Dr. Rüdiger Goyk
President, CHRO
IAV GmbH
Kurt Blumenröder
President, CEO
IAV GmbH
Working with precision: IAV engineers at the engine test bench
New Testing Center in Chemnitz
All set for the end of 2011:
IAV’s new test benches for alternative drives
will be going into service
38
8
18
24
20 Years of E-Vehicle
Development at IAV
automotion interview with Wolfgang Reimann,
Executive Vice President of Electrics / Elec-
tronics and E-Traction, and Jean Wagner-
Douglas, Head of E-Vehicle Projects and Fleet
Operation
New Foot for Crash-Test Dummies
Better protection concepts for the lower
leg reduce injury risk
And who’s going to pay?
Study by IAV subsidiary Consulting4Drive on
financing a recharging infrastructure for
e-vehicles
4 Contents | automotion automotion | Contents 5
Editorial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Topic Focus: Testing & Validation
Interview with Thomas Papenheim:
“Testing Will Be Indispensable in
Future Too” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Taking a Look Inside the Energy
Storage System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
FOCAS Focuses on Oil Consumption . . . 12
Complexity on the Test Bench . . . . . . . . . . 14
No More Collisions in Crash Planning . . . 16
Smart Foot At the Service of Safety . . . . . 18
Infotainment Systems under Test:
Top-Level Investigation Work . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Criticizing Maneuvers in Test Vehicle . . . . 26
Catalyst Aging in the Third Dimension . . 28
Let There Be Light in the Cylinder . . . . . . . 30
Seat Testing:
“The Reference Test Bench Is at IAV” . . . 37
Trends
Dr. Johannes Liebl interviewed
“As if we’d done it ourselves” . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
C4D Study: And Who’s Going to Pay? . . . 24
Projects
Ten Times as Fast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
“A One-Stop Service
Is What We Wanted” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
International Development Work
in the “Project House” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Electric (At)traction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
About IAV
Interview: Concentrated Expertise
in Electromobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
New Laboratory for Sensor and
Actuator Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
News in Brief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
IAV Dates – This is Where to Meet Us . . . 42
16Crash Planning Tool
IAV uses database solution to plan tests more quickly and
coordinate them better
6 Topic Focus: Testing & Validation
Testing will remain indispensable despite more and more simulations – from p. 6
6 Driving Forces | automotion
“Testing will be indis-pensable in future too”
IAV is highly respected
as validation partner –
testing expertise is
being expanded further
still
automotion | Driving Forces 7
Thomas Papenheim is Executive Vice-
President of Vehicle Safety and Exteri-
or Development. In this interview with
automotion, he explains the importance of
testing – in conjunction with simulation and
against the backdrop of new technical devel-
opments, such as lightweight design and elec-
tromobility.
What significance does testing have in
today’s automotive industry?
Testing vehicles and components, of course,
plays a vital part. Despite simulation continu-
ing to gain significance over recent years,
there’s still no way round testing for obtaining
reliable information. This is why it will remain a
key component in the development process
– assuming it continues to move forward.
Has the balance between simulation and
testing shifted?
Not only has the share of simulation increased
over the last 15 years – it’s also become far more
conclusive. This is why we really can replace test-
ing with computer simulations in some areas,
such as in vehicle safety. And it is meanwhile sav-
ing us the need to carry out all sorts of crash
tests. On top of this, manufacturers want to de-
velop new vehicles in ever shorter periods. This
is something that can only be done if we can sim-
ulate as much as possible in the “virtual phase”
of projects while at the same time reaching a high
level of maturity.
Beside this trend toward more and more simu-
lation, the demands placed on motor vehicles
have constantly grown – and these have given
rise to new questions the computer currently has
no answers to. So, although the boundary be-
tween simulation and testing may, in fact, be shift-
ing, new tests are also coming into play for new
functions. So, work isn’t likely to run out on us in
the future either.
Where are simulations still stretched to
their limits today?
Even today, simulations provide a highly con-
clusive basis for configuring structures. In oth-
er domains, like fuel spillage or some of the sim-
ulations in crash testing, they still don’t provide
the necessary accuracy. This is where tremen-
dous importance is still placed on testing, par-
ticularly in terms of validation for satisfying
statutory requirements. Testing will remain in-
dispensable here in future too.
What influence do the high-voltage systems
in hybrid and electric vehicles have on test-
ing and validation?
Besides meeting specific stipulations, vehicles
with alternative drives need to meet the same le-
gal requirements as combustion-engine vehicles
do. At the same time, though, they differ signifi-
cantly in terms of weight and package. This
means we need to broaden the perspective in
our test-case approach. In the event of a colli-
sion, for instance, the risk of fire from an electric
vehicle is far higher, and we need to rule out the
likelihood of this happening as far as possible.
This demands many additional tests – from
component level to the entire vehicle. And it also
means we must constantly match our testing fa-
cilities to new requirements and situations.
Lightweight design with aluminum or CFRP
is a further trend. What effect is this having
on testing?
The bodyshell is a central component in our ve-
hicle-development projects, with lightweight
construction playing a hugely important part in
this context because cars need to become
lighter – also for climate-protection reasons. At
the same time, of course, passive safety still
needs to be guaranteed. But lightweight design
and vehicle safety needn’t necessarily be con-
tradictory. In the past, vehicles have become
heavier and heavier because the demands on
safety have continued to rise, making it neces-
sary to integrate new measures and components,
such as knee bags. When alternative materials are
used to make vehicles lighter again, less energy
needs to be discharged in the event of a collision
which, in turn, reduces strain on the vehicle’s
structure. In testing, we’re confronted with new
materials with behaviors which – unlike steel – are
still largely an unknown quantity for us.
What part can development partners like
IAV play in testing?
To start with, we can take care of specific test cas-
es on the carmaker’s behalf – particularly in re-
lation to integrating alternative drives where we
have a wealth of experience both in the e-drive
segment as well as on the bodyshell integration
side. Both fields of expertise can be intermeshed
very well in testing. This is a service our clients
also ask for, and we are currently working on a
project of this type. Although manufacturers in
many cases also attend to innovative aspects
themselves, they are just as pleased to fall back
on a partner with experience in the new field. IAV
can offer its clients precisely this.
How would you like to take your depart-
ment’s testing competency forward in fu-
ture?
In my department, we work on a broad range of
different projects, from customized solutions to
vehicle integration. For us, testing is a central
component, and we will need to grow to keep
pace with ever tighter statutory requirements and
new trends. We are currently in the process of up-
grading our crash testing facility to meet new de-
mands from e-mobility.
This is a continuous process of improvement. A
challenge we are facing to satisfy the demands
of future projects.
Contact:
Taking a Look Inside the Energy Storage System
8 Driving Forces | automotion automotion | Driving Forces 9
An ultra-modern testing center is being built in Chemnitz with test benches for
batteries, cells, e-motors and transmissions
Storage area
Preparation zone
Cell test bench
Battery-system test bench
E-motor test bench
Control room
Transmission test bench
The end of 2011 is a very special date
for IAV’s battery experts. This is when
a new battery test bench will be going
into service at the Chemnitz operation. This
can be used for conducting detailed meas-
urements on the complex and sensitive en-
ergy-storage systems under a wide range of
ambient conditions. It will also make it easi-
er to calibrate the battery management sys-
tem.
“We are treading new territory with the new test
bench”, says Daniel Tittel, head of IAV’s battery-
system development team. “For our studies,
we have so far used the existing infrastructure
and adapted it to our needs. The new facility
is the first test bench that has been specifically
designed from the very beginning for exam-
ining batteries and operation in the system net-
work.” The significance of electrical energy
storage systems has grown immensely in re-
cent years, a fact that is also reflected in the
increasing number of client projects. The
new test bench complements IAV’s portfolio
which also covers the development of battery
management systems (BMS) and battery pro-
totypes.
On the one hand, investigations will center
around the behavior of batteries themselves
– such as the way they respond to heat and
cold, their power output in relation to tem-
perature and the effects ambient conditions
have on aging. On the other hand, IAV’s experts
also focus their attention on the battery man-
agement system (BMS). In addition to working
correctly, calibration of this control unit also
plays a crucial part in terms of the later per-
formance of electric vehicles – in future, at least
part of this process is to run through auto-
matically.
From the Arctic to the Sahara: energy-storage systems in the climate chamber
The new test bench will allow our engineers to
test two batteries side by side and even han-
dle bulky specimens without a problem – af-
ter all, the high-performance storage sys-
tems for electric vehicles are much bigger and
bulkier than the familiar hybrid batteries. “In fu-
ture, we’ll be able to examine batteries meas-
uring up to 2.9 meters long, 1.4 meters wide
and as much as 1.2 meters high”, Tittel reports.
“Apart from a few oddities, this will provide the
capability of scrutinizing any traction battery
from the passenger-car and light commercial-
vehicle segment.”
What is more, energy storage systems can be
exposed to a wide range of temperatures on
the new test bench – this is particularly im-
portant because their efficiency varies sig-
nificantly if they heat up or cool down by just
a few degrees. “Lithium-ion storage batteries
work best at a temperature of about 30 de-
grees and still achieve a respectable life
span”, Tittel explains. “In the new climate
chamber, we can generate temperatures from
minus 40 to plus 90 degrees Celsius for test-
ing cold starts or examining self-discharge at
high temperatures.”
In the vehicle, sophisticated cooling and heat-
ing makes sure the sensitive storage battery
always works at its “feel good” temperature –
in most cases using air, a mixture of water and
glycol or oil as coolant or heating agent. The
new test bench is equipped for all of these dif-
ferent systems so that Tittel and his col-
leagues can examine virtually every case oc-
curring in practice.
Nothing remains hidden: sensorslook inside every cell
The test-bench sensor system reports exactly
what is going on inside the battery: Sensors
for measuring current, voltage and tempera-
ture deliver an initial picture of the component’s
general state. The engineers are provided
with more detailed information by monitoring
individual cell voltages – up to 130 values af-
ter all. “This allows us, for example, to meas-
ure the internal resistance of single cells”, Tit-
tel explains. “The mark of a good battery is for
the voltages in the cells not to drift very far
apart under steady-state and dynamic load.”
The new test bench will in future provide the
battery experts with two different ways of ob-
taining this information: They can either read
the voltage values from the battery manage-
ment system (BMS) or use their own sensors
to determine them directly in the battery – this
opens up the capability of checking whether
the BMS functions correctly.
Checking the internal resistances is a partic-
ularly exacting test case. As the voltage sen-
sors always measure the voltage drop across
cell and cell contact, isolation of contact re-
sistance from the cell’s internal resistance is
not directly apparent. Both values can only be
separated from each other by comparing a
cell-voltage model with several steady-state
and dynamic battery load tests.
BMS much easier to calibrate
Correct BMS calibration is crucial to battery life
and performance. This means: Part of the 1200
to 1300 parameters must be defined by con-
ducting measurements on the cell as well as
in the system – a lot of work for the develop-
ers. The new test bench is designed to auto-
mate at least part of the calibration process.
“In conjunction with our cell test bench, we will
be able to determine around 200 of these pa-
rameters with the new facility”, Tittel explains.
“To do this, the test bench selects a number
of temperatures and power outputs, with the
BMS defining the correct values all by itself.”
For instance, activation of the cooling system
can be parameterized automatically by simu-
lating various load states and ambient condi-
tions. In a learning mode, relevant BMS func-
tions then automatically set the necessary
cooling parameters for the vehicle that is be-
ing calibrated. A similar process takes place for
calibrating aging models. In the near future,
IAV’s cell test benches will be extended by ad-
ditional channels with a higher output for
conducting studies into isolating the various
influences of aging. This leaves the way clear
for the objective of transferring power from the
individual cell to the battery system.
Contact:
The ultimate in modern measurement technology: the new battery test bench in Chemnitz leaves engineers wanting for nothing.
10 Driving Forces | automotion automotion | Driving Forces 11
DC load unit
Test bench control andmeasurement datarecording system
Conditioning unit
Safety climate chamber
Vehicle electrical system simulation Test specimen 1 Test specimen 2
How much oil does an engine use?
How well does the crankcase
breather work? Questions like these
can be answered using a mass spectrome-
ter. With patent pending, a calibration process
from IAV significantly enhances measuring
accuracy.
The basic idea behind determining oil con-
sumption is: Isolating gaseous molecules
from the flow of exhaust gas and measuring
them in a mass spectrometer that separates
the various constituents using a magnetic
quadrupole. “Whereas this method delivers the
concentration of oil in exhaust gas, we are in-
terested in information on absolute mass
flow”, says Klaus Herrmann from Base-Engine
Testing at IAV. “Using calibration, we can com-
pute mass flows from the ion concentrations
measured.”
The standard calibration method used by
IAV’s mass spectrometer was unable to sat-
isfy the experts’ demands: It heats com-
pressed air to 300 degrees that passes to the
mass spectrometer in the form of a con-
stant volumetric flow. A defined mixture of oil
and solvent is added to it and serves as a ref-
erence for calibration. “Unfortunately, this al-
ways meant interrupting the measurement
campaigns and modifying the engine”, Her-
rmann reports. “Apart from this, calibration
used to take place at constant pressure and
temperature whereas measured values are ex-
tensively governed by engine boundary con-
ditions.”
Close-coupled calibration improvesaccuracy
This is why IAV specialists developed “close-
coupled calibration”. Part of the exhaust-gas
flow is drawn off and throttled to a defined vol-
umetric flow rate. “This eliminates the effect
pressure fluctuations have on the values
measured”, Herrmann says. “The entire path is
heated to 250 degrees, with the calibration
mixture being added directly to the exhaust-
gas flow.” This measure does away with the
complicated process of modifying the engine
so that the system can easily be used for re-
calibrating any operating point. “This saves us
about half the time”, Herrmann reports. “Apart
from this, the new method enhances calibra-
tion accuracy and, with this, the quality of
measurement information.”
Because the method widens the system’s
measurement range to include higher tem-
peratures and pressures, it is not only suitable
for studying naturally aspirated engines but
also modern supercharged spark-ignition and
diesel engines as well as exhaust-gas tur-
bocharger as oil users. Following 18 months
of successfully using the calibration method
which belongs to the FOCAS-1200-System
(Fast Oil Consumption Acquisition System
1200), IAV has applied to have it patented.
Further details:
FOCAS Focuses on Oil ConsumptionIAV develops better method for calibrating a mass spectrometer
CalibrationThrottle
Measuring point
in the exhaust
system
Ex
ha
us
t g
as
Heater
Metering valve
Heizer
Draw-off point with
baffle plates
Blow-by meter
Cartridge for
solvent/oil mixture
Controller Mass spectrometer
automotion | Driving Forces 13
IAV’s experts use a mass spectrometer to determine
an engine’s oil consumption
12 Driving Forces | automotion
Electrification of the powertrain is mak-
ing great strides. But how do you test
systems of this kind? In addition to ex-
isting modern engine test benches adapted
for hybrid drives, two test benches are being
built at the Chemnitz operation that are
equipped specifically for hybrid and electric
drives. As such, IAV is responding to the
growing number of client projects and ex-
panding its capacities in the field of electro-
mobility.
The future is a highly complicated affair: Once
upon a time, cars had a handful of electric
components to support the combustion en-
gine – in future, volts and amps are set to take
center stage. This will have repercussions
for the work of IAV’s test specialists: “In the
past, our job was to develop and study com-
ponents, like starters, alternators as well as
small e-drives for auxiliaries”, reports Mirko
Taubenreuther, head of the E-Traction System
Development department. “Then, it was all
about individual parameters, such as effi-
ciency or maximum power output.” The
straightforward times are over: In testing hy-
brid and electric vehicles, the focus is on the
performance of a complex system made up of
many different components – battery, power
electronics and e-motor must work together
reliably and produce optimum results.
Validating functions in the contextof the overall system
Numerous controllers, for example, make sure
that the flows of energy in a hybrid vehicle are
channeled in the right direction. “Activating the
electric traction system alone involves eval-
uating a stack of information before it can be
enabled. Spread over many levels, these di-
agnostic results must then be processed”,
says Taubenreuther, describing the challenge.
“This is why it is so important to validate
these shared functions for components in the
overall system context.” The overall system is
also influenced by the effect of functions to
protect the user and electric traction system,
also beyond its bounds.
“The new system test benches will allow us to
evaluate this overall system and its response
to operating conditions”, Taubenreuther says.
“For example, we look at how temperature af-
fects the power output, life span and function
of battery and power electronics.” His team can
now examine safety aspects too: What hap-
pens if a fault occurs in the high-voltage sys-
tem? How does the power electronics respond
to shorting? Does the system assume a safe
state in a controlled manner?
Bench testing saves time and money
Questions of this nature relating to function-
al safety can save lives: With a voltage in the
region of 400 V, the system in an electric ve-
hicle must respond immediately if a high-
Legend
D1 Dyno 1
D2 Dyno 2
DA Data acquisition systems
DB HV disconnection box
I1 Sample inverter 1
I2 Sample inverter 2
PS DC power supply (source / sink)
S1 Sample e-machine 1
S2 Sample e-machine 2
TC Test bench control systems
TS1 Torque sensor 1
TS2 Torque sensor 2
DA
I1I2
PS
TC
D2
S2
S1
D1TS2
TS1
DB
14 Driving Forces | automotion
voltage cable becomes detached and elec-
trifies the bodyshell. To begin with, it is nec-
essary to tame the electric drive’s high dy-
namics. In theory, initial calibration could also
be tested in a test vehicle”, Taubenreuther says.
“We prefer to do this on our test bench.” This
also saves a lot of time and money. Analyzing
complex systems in a prototype vehicle would
involve the testers constantly having to
recharge the battery. In the laboratory, electric
energy is constantly available from a battery
simulator.
Although the battery supplies energy all the
time, testing with a real high-voltage energy
storage system of the type used later on in the
actual vehicle is more realistic in specific test
scenarios. This is why IAV colleagues use real-
life batteries for specific measurements: For
this purpose, they connect the test bench for
the e-traction system to the neighboring air-
conditioned battery test rig. This link-up makes
it possible to examine the traction system un-
der virtually all operating conditions on a re-
producible basis. “This takes us extremely
close to reality and gives us reliable results in
all operating states”, says Taubenreuther with
a smile.
The system test bench – extensivecoverage of a broad market
This is also partly attributable to the design of the
two new drive-unit test benches: They can cope
with outputs of up to 150 kilowatts and speeds
of up to 15,000 rpm. “This provides us with a uni-
versal test bench that covers much of the mar-
ket”, Taubenreuther reckons. “Most electric ve-
hicles will come with a power output of between
60 and 120 kilowatts.” And a neighboring trans-
mission and powertrain test bench can also be
used. The automation systems and the electrics
simulation environment are on the cutting edge
of technology as well – simultaneous validation
of drive hardware and software places exacting
demands on both test bench components.
But even the best technology is of no use with-
out qualified staff – this is why IAV has provided
advanced training for the test-bench opera-
tors, prepared them for the complex task
they face and brought in experience from pre-
vious projects. For IAV, these investments in
personnel and technology provide the cor-
nerstone for further expanding the e-traction
business area. Based on existing cell testers
together with the new battery and battery-
pack test benches as well as the ability to test
electro-mechanical drive systems through
to the gear output on new test benches, we
can cover all function tests in the e-traction
segment. “Demand is growing all the time. All
manufacturers are hard at work in this domain
and we are looking forward to new client proj-
ects.”
Contact:
Complexity on the Test BenchIAV is expanding its capacities for testing e-traction systems
Results close to reality
Interlinked with other test facili-
ties, the new system test benches
deliver reliable results that pro-
duce a realistic picture.
automotion | Driving Forces 15
16 Driving Forces | automotion
Crash tests need to be planned care-
fully to get the most out of test ve-
hicles and testing facilities. IAV has
developed a database solution that helps to
generate the testing matrix and makes sure
that the timetable is easy to follow and co-
ordinate within a project and beyond project
boundaries.
Which tests are prescribed for approval in
country A? What does country B demand?
Can tests for approval in both countries be
combined? It is questions like these that
crash experts face when they prepare their
tests. So far, this complex task of planning
crash tests has been done by hand, with test
engineers sometimes using their own terms
to denote crash types. In part, testing is also
planned on a decentralized basis which
means there is no project-spanning access
to deadlines and plans. Planning changes are
difficult to retrace when various persons sit at
their computers are work on documents at lo-
cal level.
IAV database with the wordings of dozens of laws
Working together, Björn Unnerstall and Markus
Rogner have developed a solution to the
problem: Their “crash planning tool” is a data-
base-assisted application that runs on a
central server. “Now, everyone can view all
plans, allowing teams to plan side by side and,
in an ideal situation, even use one and the
same test for different projects”, explains the
IAV expert in crash calibration and sensor sys-
tems. “The system also standardizes the ter-
minology and layout of test plans.” With data
being held at a central point, retracing
changes is not a problem any more either.
The tool makes the engineers’ work a lot eas-
ier: The database contains the latest wordings
of legislation and, using check boxes, testers
can specify what they wish to test and for
which country or region – such as statutory
or client specifications. “The tool then deliv-
ers a list of suggestions”, Unnerstall explains.
“This puts an end to the involved process of
planning by hand, and it is much easier to con-
struct the testing matrix – in other words, op-
timize the way tests are spread over individ-
ual vehicles.”
Fast planning and better utilization of testing capacity
The crash planning tool not only saves a lot
of time but also reduces the risk of bad plan-
ning. A clearly structured timeline shows the
engineers all project milestones and allows
them to plan crash dates accordingly. “We can
get more out of the crash testing facility and
costing is made easier too because behind
every test there’s a budget”, Unnerstall says.
“In future, we also want to include tests with
bodyshells or pedestrian protection tests, for
instance, that take place before the actual
crash. Altogether, this would further com-
plement planning.”
Contact:
No More Collisions in Crash Planning
IAV uses database solution to speed up test planning and improve coordination
automotion | Driving Forces 17
Head and thorax are already well pro-
tected by belt and airbag. IAV engi-
neers have now developed an inno-
vative foot for crash-test dummies that is de-
signed to improve protection of the lower ex-
tremities.
Crash-test dummies save lives: Without using
the high-tech dolls of steel and plastic, the de-
velopers would not be in a position to provide
any precise assessment of the injuries vehi-
cle occupants would sustain in an accident
and of how well safety measures protect
them. As a rule of thumb: The greater the ac-
curacy with which a dummy models the human
body and the more sensors it uses, the more
reliable the information will be that the engi-
neers can get from it. Spectacular crash tests
use cutting-edge measuring equipment, such
as high-resolution high-speed cameras, ac-
celeration pickups and high-performance
computers, for evaluating the data.
New goniometric dummy foot formovement analyses
In recent years, safety experts from IAV have
improved a crucial part of the dummies that are
commonly used: Their new “goniometric foot”
emulates the human ankle in a highly realistic
manner and is capable of making detailed
recordings of the movements occurring in a
collision. “For the first time, it is now possible
to measure the angles in the dummy foot in re-
lation to the lower leg”, explains crash-test ex-
pert Lutz Deneke from the Overall Vehicle –
Safety Development department at Gifhorn.
“Angle information provides the basis for con-
ducting movement analyses and inferring in-
jury mechanisms.” This could help to config-
ure the concepts for protecting vehicle oc-
cupants’ feet and tibiae (shinbones) more ef-
fectively in future.
An important mission: With the introduction of
safety belt and airbag, the head and thorax of
vehicle occupants are nowadays well pro-
tected – this is why accident experts are in-
creasingly turning their attention to the foot be-
cause too many injuries are still occurring in the
lower extremity zone. “Concepts that protect
the lower leg more effectively reduce the risk
of injury and prevent serious injuries occurring
in the event of an accident”, Deneke says.
Sensors record angles in the ankle
Normally, the human foot can only be moved
to a very limited extent in relation to the low-
er leg: The anatomy only permits low levels of
rotation. Exceeding them – in an accident, say
– can result in serious injuries. To date, it has
not been possible to measure these move-
ments in any detail in a crash test – the dum-
mies simply have not had the necessary foot
Smart Foot at the Service of SafetyIAV enhances the dummy foot – with the aim of improving protection
for the lower leg
18 Driving Forces | automotion
sensors. This is why IAV’s experts have been
enhancing the feet of dummies since 2005
and fitting them with additional sensors. The
latest version of the newly developed foot
measures the three angles in the ankle using
magnets and Hall sensors that can record the
movements and send them in the form of a
highly accurate digital signal to the measure-
ment electronics. “The ball-and-socket joint is
equipped with a magnet, and the joint sock-
et has a chip with a Hall sensor”, Deneke ex-
plains. “Movement of the joint alters the mag-
netic field in the Hall sensor, allowing us to ob-
tain angle data.”
New foot version is even more realistic
The foot’s predecessor version did not use a
Hall sensor but a potentiometer. As a result,
this variant weighed about a kilogram – 300
grams more than a natural human foot. “This
isn’t a problem in most cases because the foot
is only rarely hurled through the foot well”,
Deneke says. “Benefiting from the Hall tech-
nology used, our new model only weighs 700
grams, allowing us to obtain measurement
readings that are even more realistic.”
Having already been used in several crash
tests, a patent is now pending for the artificial
body part. “The angle information provides the
basis for precisely analyzing the tibia index
used in the safety test”, says Deneke, de-
scribing the benefit of the new development.
“The resultant insight is the key to developing
concepts for protecting the lower extremities.”
The new dummy foot is easy to use
The aim of development was to extend the
performance spectrum of the “50-percent hy-
brid III foot” by three items of angle informa-
tion. The “50-percent” dummy is a doll that was
developed on the basis of body measure-
ments taken by the US Army and said to be
representative of half the population. The
term “hybrid” relates to the design of the
dummy that is made of steel and plastic.
The new dummy foot can be used without any
major effort: “Comparing the dimensions of the
conventional dummy foot and the new go-
niometric foots shows that the diameter has
been widened from 60 to 94 millimeters”,
Deneke says. “To use the goniometric foot, all
that’s necessary is to adapt the dummy leg
flesh.” The new “body part”, however, has no
effect on the way the dummy’s lower leg and
foot are positioned in the vehicle.
Contact:
automotion | Driving Forces 19
For the first time, it is possible to meas-
ure angles in the dummy foot in relation
to the lower leg, conduct movement
analyses and infer injury mechanisms –
optimizing the development of con-
cepts for protecting vehicle occupants’
feet and tibiae.
Premiere
Top-Level Investigation Work How do you test complex infotainment systems?
With a good measure of expertise and the right tools
Every project is different: IAV’s ex-
perts constantly face new challenges
in testing infotainment systems. In
tracking down defects, they rely on their au-
tomobile expertise and a tried and proven
testing process. They get assistance from the
standard “Quality Center” tool from Hewlett-
Packard that can be matched to the specific
demands of any client.
It is mainly the electronics that are responsi-
ble for the constant stream of complex chal-
lenges IAV’s defect hunters face: New func-
tions in navigation systems, telephone, radio
and internet are increasingly elbowing their way
into the vehicle – and want developing and
testing. It is important here for all components
to interact correctly. For example, when a
traffic announcement comes in while a CD is
playing, the infotainment system needs to
change audio sources straight away. And
while this is going on, the driver might get a
phone call that is put out through the speak-
er. Once phone call and traffic announcement
are over, the system must continue playing the
CD precisely the point it was interrupted at.
Many components are required to work to-
gether – in perfect coordination.
Besides the new functions, the growing num-
ber of vehicle variants is also making the “in-
vestigation work” involved in locating faults a
highly complex affair. This is why version man-
agement is a key task today: “The test envi-
ronments can be completely different from
one vehicle to the next”, says Dirk Mitzlaff, head
of the System Integration department. “Ten to
fifteen versions – for different countries and
models – are no rarity, and all of them must be
tested side by side.”
20 Driving Forces | automotion automotion | Driving Forces 21
Flow diagram of HPQC module
HP Quality Center as IAV test management
Requirements
Structuredproject requirement
Test Plan
Structured test cases
TestLab
Test planning
TestLab
Testing
Defects
Defect management
Validation in the vehicle / test station
Broad expertise and cutting-edge tools
Fortunately, IAV’s experts are masters of their
trade. “In infotainment testing, our automotive
expertise is particularly important for cor-
rectly assessing the complex links and func-
tions of the hardware and software compo-
nents involved”, says Mitzlaff knowingly, who is
a kind of “chief investigator”. “Going it alone is
not our thing: We work as a team within an effi-
cient process that provides us with the capa-
bility of quickly localizing trouble sources.”
This tried and proven testing process guar-
antees the high quality of results and is ex-
tremely flexible: Our experts can match it to the
requirements of each and every client.
“Needless to say, we use modern tools for trou-
bleshooting”, Henkel says. This is where the
Quality Center (QC) from Hewlett-Packard
comes in: QC is a platform that is used on a
broad basis in IAV test projects. The program
helps us “take down evidence” in all phases of
the troubleshooting process – from managing
requirements to documenting faults. “The test
management system’s consistent structure
makes work very easy because data can be in-
terlinked”, Henkel reports. “For instance, you can
instantly see which tests have been done
and what their outcome was – no lead is lost.”
This is precisely what counts: “In cockpit elec-
tronics we are confronted with many thousand
functions which means that a single unit in-
volves working through several thousand test
cases”, Mitzlaff says, doing the math. “There’s
no way of keeping on top of this complexity any
more with simple tables or improvised data-
bases – successful troubleshooting today
demands the use of cutting-edge tools.”
Powerful standard tool can be tailored to individual needs
IAV’s test engineers have been working with the
software for many years now and know the pro-
gram so well that they can adapt it to suit any
specific need. This permits a made-to-mea-
sure approach to any assignment: If clients pre-
fer to use their own solutions for managing re-
quirements or faults, IAV’s test engineers can
program the appropriate interfaces for such
tools – such as for the commonly used DOORS
program.
“These aligned interfaces ensure that data or
intermediate results can be reliably imported
and exported at any stage in the development
process”, Henkel reports. “This permits seam-
less test management – not only for the cock-
pit electronics but also for engine manage-
ment, transmission development and other ve-
hicle functions.” Besides link-ups of this type,
the system also offers an implemented work-
flow – for dealing with faults, say – and assigns
various roles and rights to its users.
No fault is left uncovered
Many factors play a part in hunting down in-
fotainment defects: Outstanding expertise
across the vehicle, process knowledge, client-
related organizational knowledge as well as be-
ing in command of standard tools and being
able to adapt them. This combination of skills
makes sure that defects do not stand a chance
in IAV’s test projects. “This keeps our clear-up
rate at a constantly high level”, Mitzlaff is
pleased to say. “We make sure no defects can
creep into mass production.”
Contact:
22 Driving Forces | automotion
“As If We’d Done it Ourselves”
A man who’s achieved and changed a lot: automotion talks to
ATZ and MTZ publisher Dr. Johannes Liebl
Former BMW manager Dr. Johannes
Liebl worked for BMW until the end of
February where he was responsible as
“Minister for Energy” for the “EfficientDy-
namics” package. The new publisher of ATZ
und MTZ spoke to Wilfried Nietschke and
Steffen Lintz about his career at the Munich-
based premium manufacturer, working with
IAV and the future of the automobile.
Dr. Liebl, what were the highlights in your
many years of working at BMW?
The most prominent highlight as engine de-
veloper was the Valvetronic, and as vehicle de-
veloper, the EfficientDynamics technology I
had been working on during my last years at
the company. I’d been in overall vehicle de-
velopment since 2003 where I was responsi-
ble for “efficiency”. We came to realize we not
only needed to offer sporty cars but efficient
ones too. And we also realized we couldn’t do
so by improving our engines alone. That’s why,
as “Minister for Energy”, it was my job to follow
a strictly systematic approach in tackling he
subject.
How did your colleagues react to the new
“Minister for Energy”?
There was great opposition to introducing the
start-stop system, for instance. Many col-
leagues felt it would be unacceptable to our
customers. We introduced it, all the same – but
without backing from the Board, it would have
been impossible. We took it into mass pro-
duction in March 2007, and the “EfficientDy-
namics” concept has been with us ever since”.
Let us take a glimpse into the future.
How will the electric motor in the power-
train change the combustion engine?
The electrical energy storage systems will de-
termine every aspect of development. If we
had reliable and efficient batteries, we could
make massive changes to the combustion en-
gine. Because when do you need maximum
power output on a journey? In most cases, you
can manage on much less – and if we were to
configure engines for this typical power re-
quirement, they could undergo radical change
– in relation to charge cycle, for example. The
peak power output occasionally demanded
would then come from the electric motor.
On the other hand, the combustion
engine is under discussion as a “range
extender” for electric vehicles. Is there
any particular option you favor for this
function?
I believe a three-cylinder engine provides
certain benefits in respect of charge cycle –
it has the charge cycle of a six-cylinder engine
and sounds good too. But whether we still
need to pack as much technology into the en-
gine as we do today, I can’t say. Generally
speaking, I’m fascinated with keeping things
simple, and a small internal combustion engine
would also have a clear edge over a large one
in relation to friction and heat loss.
Where else do you seen challenges in
electromobility?
Recharging vehicles is still a problem that re-
mains unsolved: In my view, you can’t expect
any motorist in this day and age to fiddle about
and connect a vehicle to the power socket with
a bulky cable – that also gets absolutely filthy
in winter. This is where other solutions need to
be found and, for this reason, I see IAV’s in-
ductive charging system as being a highly in-
teresting idea.
The new propulsion concepts are presenting
developers with immense challenges.
How do you see the future of development-
service providers in this context?
All automobile manufacturers have got so
much on their plates at the moment that it’s im-
possible for them to deal with these challenges
on their own – this means support will always
be needed from outside. This trend is not only
being driven by new drive concepts but also
by the new markets we need to offer separate
derivatives for.
When was your first contact with IAV?
That must have been about 1995. It so hap-
pened that I’d been invited to IAV in Chemnitz
and discovered they didn’t only work for Volk-
swagen. At the time, our calibration engi-
neers were firmly convinced they were the only
ones who could give an engine that typical
BMW character. About a year later, we then
“tested the waters”: IAV calibrated the BMW
316i for Greece and Portugal – where motor-
vehicle tax was defined by engine displace-
ment and we had to develop a special 1.6-liter
engine because our 316 had a slightly larger
swept volume. This was the first time BMW’s
engine people had worked with an outsider.
And after two or three calibration loops, the car
was wonderful to drive – as if we had done it
ourselves.
Contact:
automotion | Trends 23
Ext. requirements management
Requirements
Ext. defect management
Defects
Dr. Johannes Liebl
And who’s going to pay?
The power companies also need to be involved in setting up
a recharging infrastructure for e-vehicles
24 Trends | automotion
Respondents in the C4D study said
they did not want to recharge more
than four to seven times a month at
most. But for a traveling radius of 80
kilometers they would need to
recharge as many as 15 times. This
equates to a full recharge every two
days.
Wishful thinking
automotion | Trends 25
The EU’s MERGE project (web ad-
dress: www.ev-merge.eu) is looking
for ways of bringing the European
power grid into line with the needs of sus-
tainable e-mobility. Integrating renewable en-
ergies and the widespread introduction of
electric vehicles are facing immense chal-
lenges. IAV subsidiary Consulting4Drive
(C4D) has analyzed the market and uncov-
ered a funding shortfall running into the
billions for setting up a recharging infra-
structure.
The German government is planning to get a
million electric vehicles onto German roads by
2020. And other European countries have set
their sights on a widespread introduction of
electric cars over the next few years as well.
At the same time, more renewable energy
sources are to be connected to the power
grid. On behalf of the German Renewable En-
ergy Federation (BEE), the Fraunhofer Institute
for Wind Energy and Energy System Tech-
nology (IWES) has worked out that in 2020 as
much as 47 percent of our electricity will come
from renewable energy sources.
Are e-vehicles any good as mobile
energy storers?
Restructuring the supply of energy in this way
will have huge impacts on the power grids
which is why the EU has launched the “Mobile
Energy Resources in Grids of Electricity”
(MERGE) project. Within two years, 16 partners
from research and industry in nine European
countries will develop a concept for enhanc-
ing the European power grid. Together, they
will demonstrate ways of using a smart grid
to avoid physically restructuring the grid and
the costs this would involve.
This is where MERGE sees electric vehicles as
mobile storage systems capable of cushion-
ing weather-induced fluctuations in alterna-
tive power production – despite the battery
capacity of a million vehicles only being suffi-
cient at most for five percent of electricity pro-
duced by renewable means.
As project partner in MERGE, C4D has based
its study on a clear market focus. This includes
an analysis of the existing supply grid at fill-
ing stations and presents refueling habits as
a basis for comparison with the future
recharging process. In a representative sur-
vey carried out in Germany, Spain and the UK,
the experts also examined how the future tar-
get group felt about the time and comfort as-
pects.
Consumers want in-journey
recharging times of five minutes
For the German market, several aspects play
a key part in making recharging equally as at-
tractive for consumers as today’s refueling
process. With an effective vehicle traveling ra-
dius of 80 kilometers per battery charge, a
recharging station should be available every
2.1 road kilometers. During a journey, charg-
ing should not take more than five minutes –
at home and at work, people accept times of
between 15 minutes and three hours. Even
“fast charging” – a recharging concept that
promises to shorten charging times to about
15 minutes by using high levels of current but
is so far not seen as being ready for the mar-
ket – is felt by consumers to be too slow dur-
ing a journey.
Those interviewed said they did not want to
recharge a car more than four to seven times
a month at most, and running costs should
also be at least 40 percent less than for a com-
bustion-engine vehicle. The number of ac-
cepted monthly recharges differs dramatically
from the charging frequencies currently nec-
essary. For a cruising range of 80 kilometers,
the battery would have to be recharged as
many as 15 times compared with the four to
seven times half of those interviewed said
they were prepared to accept. This equates to
a full recharge every two days.
How can consumers be motivated to take part?
And a further challenge comes from cruising
range: Battery capacity is only sufficient for a
few kilometers – which consumer would be pre-
pared to act as a mobile storage unit and make
part of this energy available to the power grid
(“Vehicle2Grid”), additionally increasing charg-
ing frequency? This is precisely what MERGE
wants to encourage, though.
Low running costs could provide such moti-
vation: In terms of consumption, motorists
only expect costs of € 6.23 to travel a distance
of 100 kilometers in an electric vehicle instead
of € 10.37 for the same distance in a com-
bustion-engine vehicle. Although current fig-
ures proceed from € 6.26 per 100 kilometers
and thus satisfy expectations – this analysis not
only neglects possible future taxes but also fails
to include the investments necessary in
recharging infrastructure.
Constructing the charging points will cost as much as € 8.2 billion
Going on the assumption that the average cost
of a conventional – i.e. slow – charging point will
be € 7,250, the funding shortfall becomes ob-
vious: An investment volume of € 806 million
is needed to provide a density of one station
every 2.1 road kilometers in Germany. An in-
frastructure for accelerated charging at an
average price of € 12,425 per charging point
would cost up to € 1.4 billion.
Today’s filling stations, however, do not just pro-
vide one pump but an average of six. Translating
this service into the provision of charging sta-
tions – with the necessary charging duration
alone speaking in favor of such a consideration
–, the necessary investment would even rise to
€ 4.8 billion for a slow, and to € 8.2 billion for a
fast charging infrastructure. Neither case in-
cludes installation costs and annual servicing.
Who will foot the bill?
But which stakeholder in the system of ener-
gy companies, grid operators, charging-point
providers, vehicle manufacturers and con-
sumers is supposed to pay for this? The Fraun-
hofer Institute predicts that investment costs
will be passed on in the price paid at the
recharging point of 42 eurocents to 13.2 eu-
rocents per kilowatt hour. No later than here will
the question arise as to profitable business
models. The return on investment from indi-
vidual charging points is likely to be low if only
a few vehicles are spread over a dense network
of stations, and if motorists also expect lower
energy costs than they are currently accus-
tomed from their filling stations.
Based on the assumption that a public charg-
ing point is frequented by three vehicles a day
and each vehicle tops up a partially charged
battery with a further 15 kilowatt hours, an elec-
tricity price of 20 eurocents per kilowatt hour
will produce an annual turnover of just € 3,300.
A decision as to which market participant will
pick up the cost of charge losses will also be
needed. The field test conducted by a car mag-
azine revealed that charge losses of up to
30 percent could be expected for a smart elec-
tric drive on account of the need to cool the
battery. From today’s perspective, these costs
would have to be carried by the consumer.
MERGE: Savings through the smart grid
Despite these questions, the MERGE con-
cept could still prove to be an altogether work-
able solution on account of the minimal grid
modifications it involves. A smart grid is to pro-
vide the basis for simulating a uniform European
power grid and reduce the need for physical
changes to the grid. The cost saving for the grid
operator could be used for closing the gap in
the business case.
The MERGE project also makes an important
contribution toward setting technical stan-
dards – in developing a payment system, for ex-
ample. Developing a business model for a
dense network of recharging stations with
competitive energy prices and reducing the
necessary charging time while increasing trav-
eling radius continue to remain key fields of
action.
Contact:
Assessing Maneuvers in the Test Vehicle
Automatic test-drive evaluation avoids costly repeat runs
Test vehicles are precious goods: There
only come in small numbers and in-
volve a lot of work in getting them
ready before each test drive. All the more
tragic if results are shown to be unusable af-
ter a test. IAV has developed an automatic
maneuver assessment tool for testing driv-
er-assist systems that tells test drivers
whether they have kept to the rules imme-
diately after testing.
Driver-assist systems need to provide reliable
recommendations or even make decisions in
complex situations. Before they go into pro-
duction, this is why safety-critical components
are thoroughly tested – with only some of the
measurements being possible in the labora-
tory: “New functions, like adaptive cruise con-
trol or lane departure warning systems, are
based on a network of different systems
which is why they can only be tested in com-
bination”, explains Jan Obermüller, Technical
Consultant in Test Methodology at IAV. “In prac-
tice, this involves our test pilots driving a test
vehicle over thousands of kilometers in road
traffic or on test tracks.”
Test drivers must complete maneuvers as accurately as possi-ble
While test-driving, pilots work through a cat-
alog of scenarios in which driver-assist sys-
tems must demonstrate correct behavior in re-
sponse to any driving situation. “A scenario of
this type, for example, may involve approach-
ing a truck from behind, decelerating in a de-
fined manner and then tailing at a constant dis-
tance”, Obermüller says. “IAV has developed
this test catalog over a period of many years,
and it contains a wide range of critical situa-
tions, such as road works or driving into tun-
nels.”
In test driving, it is important for drivers to fol-
low the prescribed sequence as closely as
26 Elektromobilität | automotion26 Projects | automotion
possible. If they stray from it too far, the test
is not conclusive and must be repeated – but
to date, this is something drivers have only
been able to find out after the test run. “Just
imagine, you get back to the office in the
evening, evaluate your data to discover that
some of the maneuvers need repeating“,
Obermüller says. “In the meantime, the test ve-
hicle may easily not be available any more –
making it extremely complicated to repeat the
run.”
To avoid this, Obermüller has developed a sys-
tem that immediately compares a completed
maneuver with the specifications, telling the
driver in traffic-light form whether everything
has gone as planned. Green denotes “every-
thing OK”, red means “Please repeat”. If the yel-
low symbol shows, testers need to take an-
other close look at target and actual values
and then decide whether to repeat the test.
“Automatic evaluation of the driving maneu-
ver only takes a few seconds and avoids
nasty surprises later on when it comes to an-
alyzing data”, Obermüller is keen to add.
“Straight after testing, we know whether
everything has gone to plan.”
Precision test-drive measurement
Before setting out on a test drive, the test driv-
er opens the test brief that describes the ma-
neuver in writing and may also include a
sketch. Obermüller’s system also provides the
driver with a computer animation of the sce-
nario. “This improves understanding and
avoids driving errors”, he explains. “Now comes
the test. During the maneuver, sensors record
the movements made by the test vehicle
and – if necessary – also by other vehicles.”
Movement measurement is based on ab-
solute coordinates (such as GPS or a reference
system on the test site) and relative coordi-
nates (from radar or laser sensors, for exam-
ple) or a combination of both. Testers can also
use data, such as road speed and accelera-
tion, from the vehicle’s diagnostic system.
Needless to say, no test driver can take the ve-
hicle through the prescribed maneuver with
millimeter accuracy – which is why the auto-
matic evaluation process is designed to tol-
erate faults: To begin with, the system filters un-
avoidable noise out of the data measured and
fills in measurement gaps on the basis of in-
telligent interpolation. This delivers actual
values of good quality.
Are the traffic lights on green?
Target values are resident in the computer and
divided into phases, such as approaching,
slowing down and tailing at constant dis-
tance. “Many typical situations can be con-
figured for these phases using five to ten pa-
rameters”, Obermüller explains. Once the
measured values are in hand, they are com-
pared with the reference target: From the
permissible target scenarios – including giv-
en tolerances – the computer searches for the
maneuver that goes best with the measure-
ment. “By way of result, automatic evaluation
provides a target scenario with the best pos-
sible set of parameters”, Obermüller says.
“Proceeding from set thresholds, it then de-
cides whether the driving maneuver came
close enough to the specifications – with the
traffic-light system showing green, yellow or
red.”
As a result, the engineers know straight away
whether the driven scenario is suitable for test-
ing the driver-assist system. Besides saving
time, the system also comes with another ad-
vantage: It helps inexperienced test pilots to
improve their skills. “Young drivers, in partic-
ular, benefit from the direct feedback evalua-
tion gives them”, Obermüller says.
Contact:
Evaluation
Automatic evaluation immediately
shows the engineers whether the sce-
nario driven is suitable for testing the
driver-assist system.
automotion | Projects 27
Just how well a three-way catalytic con-
verter works over a vehicle’s lifespan de-
pends on many different factors that
need considering in ever-shorter development
phases. IAV applies various methods of as-
sessment for measuring aged catalysts and im-
proving aging techniques.
Automobiles need to be clean – and stay that
way over their useful life. This is the job of the
exhaust-gas aftertreatment system, in the
case of spark-ignition engines, usually a three-
way catalytic converter (TWC) will be used. It
converts nitrogen oxide into nitrogen and wa-
ter, carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide as well
as hydrocarbons into carbon dioxide and wa-
ter. The vehicle’s on-board diagnostic system
(OBD) monitors whether it continues to perform
as it should even after many years and high mi-
leages. If catalyst performance deteriorates too
far, it generates a fault message, and the vehi-
cle is checked through at the garage.
This is theory – in practice, though, diagnosing
catalyst performance properly is not that easy
because there is no way of measuring catalyst
conversion performance directly. This is why the
TWC’s oxygen storage capacity (OSC) is mea-
sured as an indication of its efficiency. An
oxygen sensor upstream of the catalyst and a
second sensor downstream measure the oxy-
gen component in the flow of exhaust gas and
use the difference between the levels they
Catalyst Aging in theThird DimensionIAV examines local aging in catalysts and provides new approaches to realistic
accelerated-aging methods for three-way catalytic converters
measure to determine how much oxygen the
catalyst can store. Just as conversion perfor-
mance, the resultant OSC value falls in relation
to life or stress duration, providing a measure
of the catalyst’s current state. This correlation,
however, is not necessarily linear, making it ne-
cessary to examine the different catalyst
functions on a selective basis. In terms of
configuration, it must also be remembered
that sensors only monitor a small part of the ca-
talyst.
Accurate three-dimensional picture of aging
The diagram on the right shows three catalysts
that have undergone aging in different ways. To
obtain a more accurate analysis, the catalyst
monoliths were cut into slices, with ten samples
being taken from each slice. Oxygen storage
capacity and the light-off temperatures (TLO)
of carbon monoxide, nitric oxide and propene
were determined on IAV’s synthetic-gas test
benches. TLO is the temperature at which
50% of the particular exhaust-gas component
is converted.
“These individual values now provide us with the
basics for obtaining an exact three-dimensio-
nal picture of conversion rate and oxygen sto-
rage capacity”, says Dr. Matthias Schmidt, de-
velopment engineer and specialist in catalyst
chemistry. “An on-road endurance test vehicle
has a conversion or OSC profile differing from
that of a burner-aged catalyst for example”, Dr.
Schmidt states. “We also have indications to
suggest that even the consumer’s general
driving behavior is reflected in the catalyst’s
aging profile.”
The reasons for inhomogeneities occurring in
the catalyst aging profile are many and varied.
“Local temperature maximums in the catalyst
can be just as responsible for uneven catalyst
stress as uneven distribution in the exhaust-gas
flow”, Dr. Schmidt adds.
Optimized accelerated aging as an important tool in configuring exhaust-gas aftertreatment
These findings are essential to develope rea-
listic and reproducible accelerated aging pro-
cesses. Catalysts are exposed to different
gas compositions at high temperatures, pro-
voking deterioration in conversion and oxygen
storage capacity. Realistic, rapidly aged cata-
lysts are required for developing vehicles in the
context of exhaust-gas aftertreatment (EGT)
and on-board diagnostics. During the advan-
ced-development phase, vehicle-aged cata-
lysts are often not available for calibrating and
validating EGT and OBD. This is where use is
then made of rapidly aged catalytic converters.
To avoid iterations in EGT and OBD, and cut de-
velopment costs, these catalysts must, of
course, age in the same way as the catalysts
used later on in consumer vehicles for after-
treating exhaust gas.
“Being familiar with the processes involved in
aging helps us develop a time-saving oven-
aging method that’ll allow us to deliver realistic
and reproducible aging results”, says Dr. Met-
he, head of Exhaust-Gas Aftertreatment Con-
cepts for SI Engines. He continues to explain
that oven-aging is far quicker in producing ca-
talyst damage and, in particular, a damage
profile similar to that resulting from standardi-
zed engine test-bench aging over a period of
a hundred hours.
But IAV’s catalyst specialists are focusing their
attention on optimizing test-bench aging too.
Although the oven is capable of generating
heat-induced catalyst damage in a highly se-
lective way, oven-aging can only reproduce
chemical contamination to a limited extent. “We
are currently taking a dual-track approach:
While improving our oven-aging technique by
introducing additional gases into the catalyst,
we’re also helping our clients to achieve reali-
stic accelerated aging on engine test benches”,
Dr. Schmidt comments.
Costs optimized by even in-vehicleaging
Analyzing the three-dimensional damage pat-
tern in the vehicle can also open a window for
the manufacturer to optimize costs. Highly
uneven catalyst aging resulting, for instance,
from an unfavorable flow of exhaust gas can
produce inhomogeneity that results in an un-
representative assessment of OSC and thus in
an unnecessary garage visit. Using the des-
cribed method of showing the catalyst in 3-D,
IAV is able to identify inhomogeneities of this
kind, make any necessary adjustment to oxy-
gen-sensor positioning, adapt oxygen storage
capacity or, by optimizing layout, reduce the pre-
cious-metal load and thus costs.
Contact:
Manganhaltiger KraftstoffOSC for fresh catalyst
1000
750
500
250
1000
750
500
250
Up
str
ea
mD
ow
ns
tre
am
OSC for burner-aged
catalyst
OSC for test-bench
aged catalyst
Inc
rea
se
Inc
rea
se
OSC
28 Projects | automotion automotion | Projects 29
Advance developers of vehicle en-
gines must be able to look into the fu-
ture – and also inside the cylinder. Us-
ing cutting-edge measurement technology,
IAV’s gasoline-engine experts can do both. In
particular, optical measurement techniques
give them valuable information from inside the
combustion chamber that can help them to
cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.
“We’re working on concepts that’ll reach the de-
velopment department in two to three years at
the earliest before we then see them enter
mass production a further two to three years
down the line”, explains Michael Günther, head
of IAV’s Gasoline Engine Thermodynamics
department. “The strategies we’re examining in-
clude refining engine downsizing with mean
pressures of up to 30 bar, enhanced gas ex-
change and lean-burn concepts.”
IAV believes in lean-burn concepts
Above all, Günther sees further advances be-
ing made in lean-burn engines – these have an
air-fuel ratio (lambda) of greater than one. “This
is the most consistent way to improve the ther-
modynamics of an engine”, the expert says. “It
takes them close to the efficiency of the diesel
while retaining all the advantages of the gaso-
line engine, such as quiet combustion through
to high engine speeds.” Under the “Quality Con-
trolled Gasoline” (QCG) heading, IAV is pulling
all the stops in this domain. Compared to a con-
ventional engine with stratified charge, QCG has
made it possible to achieve fuel savings of be-
tween five and ten percent in the NEDC. Gün-
ther expects even better savings in everyday
driving: 15 to 20 percent driving at moderate
speeds and as much as 30 percent with a foot
pressed on the gas.
Ignition, though, fails to work without further ado
since spark plugs expect a lambda of be-
tween 0.7 and 1.4. At a higher value, the mix-
ture must be rich enough at least in the area
around the spark plug. Yet excessively rich
zones in the range of lambda = 1 – such as for
a classic stratified charge with spark-plug ig-
nition – generate NOx concentrations that are
unacceptably high in exhaust gas. So richness
must be further reduced within the local mix-
ture zone as well – and this can only be done
with an alternative ignition system, like corona
ignition. “We achieve this optimized local mix-
ture zone with several successive short injec-
tions”, says Günther. “We also need to be sure
we find the optimum position for the injector
and corona igniter, select the appropriate type
and also get the spray cone parameters right.”
Testing is the only way we can tell whether this
works in practice – and this is where the mod-
ern optical measurement technique comes into
play: Günther’s department was well-appoint-
ed even before, being able to look into the cylin-
der with Doppler Global Velocimetry (DGV)
Let There Be Lightin the CylinderLaser-induced fluorescence (LIF) provides valuable data –
IAV uses the endoscopic version on the full engine
and the quantitative light sheet method (QLS).
DGV uses the Doppler effect to measure flow
fields on a spatially resolved basis. QLS eval-
uates the raw DGV data further and provides the
capability of simultaneously visualizing spatial
distributions of droplets using scattered light.
This, for example, shows how the fuel’s liquid
phase is distributed in the combustion
chamber.
LIF helps to provide new insight
With laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), tracer
molecules added to the fuel are excited by a
pulsed UV laser, making them fluoresce. “Using
a special tracer pair, we can even obtain separate
recordings of the fuel’s liquid and vaporous
phase”, Günther happily reports. “This method
also allows us to detect the distribution of oxy-
gen, making it possible to measure the distribu-
tion of residual gas in the cylinder.” Temperature
distribution in the combustion chamber can
also be recorded to locate knocking points and
pre-ignition centers for example. The fluores-
cence light even shows the course of the flame
front. Few modifications to the system even
provides the means to ascertain soot distribution
(Laser-Induced Incandescence, LII). “The laser
makes the particles glow and the intensity of heat
that is radiated lets us determine the distribution
of soot”, Günther reports. “These are important
pieces of information because from EURO VI
gasoline engines will also be required to meet ceil-
ings for particulate emissions.”
“With our measuring system, we can now
study the entire mixture-formation process,
from the point at which fresh air flows into the
cylinder right to the distribution of different sub-
stance concentrations and temperature in the
combustion chamber”, Günther says.
IAV as a user of endoscopic LIF
IAV has chosen an endoscopic version of the
LIF technique: The developers do not need a
transparent engine any more to see inside the
cylinder – a conventional full engine with two
bores at an angle of approximately 90 degrees
is now all that is needed. The laser goes into one
orifice, the other holds a camera endoscope for
measuring fluorescence or soot radiation.
“This takes us far closer to reality”, says
Günther with a smile. “With transparent engines
often only having one cylinder, we can exam-
ine complete engines with all of the interactions
that go on between the cylinders.” Thanks to LIF,
LII, DGV and QLS, he can now measure almost
everything that happens inside the engine – and
look that bit further into the future.
Contact:
30 Projects | automotion automotion | Projects 31
Optical measurement techniques
show developers the course of the
mixture-formation process and how
temperature is distributed in the com-
bustion chamber.
Answering growing engine-development
demands in a conflict between system
complexity and development resources,
IAV’s now establishing full-vehicle simulation in
the calibration process. Using an IAV simulation
program, developers can examine concepts and
also work on calibration tasks. Paired with the
engine test bench, full-vehicle simulation allows
our calibration engineers to balance the engine’s
control units in dynamic operation while doing
without any test vehicle whatsoever.
So far, calibration engineers have had to use roller
dynamometers or test tracks if they have want-
ed to include dynamic processes, such as chang-
ing operating modes or catalyst heating, while
cali brating engine control units. But for cost rea-
sons, the manufacturers are providing fewer
and fewer test vehicles, with only very few pro-
totypes of particularly exclusive models ever be-
ing available in the past anyway. With this dearth
not applying to engines – why not put the engine
on a dynamic engine test bench and “fool it into
thinking” it has got the rest of the vehicle too?
Virtual test vehicle on the enginetest bench
The approach taken by the team under Olaf
Kannapin, head of SI-Engine Production Cali -
bration, is this: The electric-load unit on the
engine test bench and the test engine are
controlled by VeLoDyn – IAV’s MATLAB /
Simulink-based software tool capable of
simulating all parts of the powertrain in real
time. This means there is no need to perform
any vehicle measurements on the test bench
for simulating the driving cycle. The proper-
ties of the virtual vehicle – such as exact
transmission behavior – are prescribed by
the calibration engineers using map models
in the form of Excel tables or, if necessary,
by following model-based physical ap-
proaches.
Once the “test vehicle” has been configured,
VeLoDyn gets on with the testing – despite
standard cycles, like NEDC and FTP75, being
resident in the software, customized meas-
urement cycles can be imported too. “This al-
lows us to achieve an extremely high level of
reproducibility and gives us defined bounda -
ry conditions at all times”, Kannapin says. “And
we’re far more efficient in the measurements
we do: Instead of one exhaust emission test
a day, we now manage ten”. As the boundary
conditions are defined, it is also possible now
to integrate advanced testing methods, such
as DOE, into the calibration process and
use them for dynamic applications.
Future technologies
The new approach cuts costs and is extremely
flexible: Our engineers can also use the software
for simulating components that do not even ex-
ist yet – the electronics of a planned hybrid ve-
hicle, for instance, or new vehicle/ transmission
variants. This way, for instance, developers can
generate a calibration concept or measure emis-
sions – even before the first vehicle leaves the
prototyping department.
Diverse applications
Resolutely simulating the entire vehicle on the en-
gine test bench permits a wide range of appli-
cations. In addition to controlling emissions, for
example, it is also possible to calibrate diagnos-
tic functions and examine them for robustness
to different driving behaviors. Application for
the fully monitored generation of limit catalysts
is an option too.
Contact:
Ten Times As Fast
IAV stokes up the speed of calibration using full-vehicle simulation
Wolfsburg, Fallersleben district: It is
in one of Volkswagen’s laboratories
that Andreas Reckewerth and his
team test the Group’s infotainment systems.
There are over a hundred test benches – and
the electronics experts also use them for test-
ing products that will only be going into VW ve-
hicles in a few years to come.
State-of-the-art technology support them in
the work they do: Most tests run through ful-
ly automatically. Computers feed the com-
ponents with data. Robots work the buttons,
simulating the settings made by the later user.
Video cameras film the instruments and
displays that are then evaluated by com-
puter. A lot of work for this goal: Making the
technology work reliably under all circum-
stances, in all countries and in all vehicle vari-
ants.
IAV has been supporting Andreas Reckew-
erth and staff since May: A team headed by
Dirk Mitzlaff is responsible for testing new
software and hardware that will be used in ex-
isting VW vehicles in the course of model im-
provement – from Polo to Touareg. In this au-
tomotion interview, Reckewerth and Mitzlaff
report on the background behind the “Test
Center Infotainment” (TCI) project and the
progress being made.
How did the idea of working together
come about?
Mitzlaff: We started supporting Volkswagen
at the TCI back in 2006. Last year, we also
took over project management and overall
testing in two projects on improving radios
and navigation systems. After working well to-
gether for so long, we wanted to take on more
responsibility in an entire project. As Volk-
swagen develops its new products in house,
we now take care of model improvement.
Reckewerth: With new functions being de-
veloped in ever shorter times, we were
stretched to our limits – after all, VW wants
to become the world’s number one which is
why we’re having to work on more and more
projects at the same time and tend to more
and more models. So we started to look for
a reliable partner who’s on top of the tech-
nology and knows the processes at VW. IAV
qualifies on both counts, and that’s why we
launched this project, which for now is limit-
ed to one year.
How does this cooperation work
in practice?
Mitzlaff: VW provided up with five testing sta-
tions that took us just a few days to set up in
Berlin. We use them for testing infotain-
ment-component communication and the
HMI. So we don’t examine individual com-
ponents, like the instrument panel – the
specialist departments do that – nor do we
have anything to do with integration in the
overall vehicle because that’s left to the
Electronics Test Center. Our job is to carry out
testing at the level in between. In other proj-
ects we develop the specs for new functions
and hand them over to the component sup-
pliers – in other words, our work takes place
at the beginning and end of the process.
Reckewerth: This is precisely the one-stop
service we wanted. Consolidating these ac-
tivities in IAV’s hands will improve efficiency
and reduce process costs. It is, of course, a
new experience for both sides – but we put
our heads together beforehand and worked
out the best possible basis for transferring
activities: defining tasks and responsibilities
as well as interfaces for communication and
contact persons. That’s paid off: To my mind,
cooperation is excellent and has met all our
expectations. The strain has been removed
from us and we’ve been able to make the po-
tential savings we were hoping to.
Do cooperation arrangements like this
exist with other development partners?
Reckewerth: No, we only work with IAV on
this sort of basis. And if we can, we’d like to
carry on until production of this generation
of infotainment systems comes to an end.
That will be in 2015.
What challenges await testing experts in
future?
Reckewerth: We are seeing complexity ex-
plode as a result, for instance, of new driver
assist systems, extended navigation capa-
bilities, new instruments in hybrid and elec-
tric vehicles as well as incorporating new de-
vices, like iPods. All of these functions, and
the way they interact, need testing – used in
VW vehicles from 2012, we’ll need to check
some 19,000 requirements for the Modular
Infotainment System (MIB) alone. There’s no
way we can do this by hand anymore which
is why automatic tests are becoming in-
creasingly important.
Mitzlaff: And this is where experience will
continue to play a huge part. There are some
faults that occur in very specific situations
time and again – pitfalls like these are only fa-
miliar if you’re an old hand in this domain.
Reckewerth: That’s right. IAV has a wealth of
experience here and in developing elec-
tronics generally. It’s because of these skills
that we know they’re the right people to take
full responsibility for testing in model im-
provement.
Contact:
“A One-Stop Service
Is What We Wanted”
IAV tests new infotainment systems fitted in VW vehicles
as part of model improvement
automotion | Projects 33 32 Projects | automotion
Engine test bench now replaces test track:
Leaving IAV’s developers to manage with
fewer prototypes and save no end of time
IAV was involved in working on the new VW Passat for China –
cooperation on three continents
34 Projects | automotion automotion | Projects 35
International Development Work in the „Project House“
The body of the new Passat for the Chi-
nese market was developed by VW
Shanghai on behalf of Volkswagen AG
and acceptance-inspected in Wolfsburg.
Production will take place in China. IAV was
also involved in its development, creating a
special infrastructure for intercontinental
collaboration. A success story: This inter-
national cooperation project ran like clock-
work.
Based on the sister model for the US market,
Volkswagen presented the “New Passat” to
its Chinese customers in April. IAV was part
of the project: The vehicle’s superstructure,
including bumpers, fenders, body styling
parts, doors and flaps, was developed in
Gifhorn. For the doors, IAV was also involved
in generating the documentation VW used
for selecting suppliers.
Mixed German-Chinese teams inGifhorn
The joint project started at the end of 2008.
“Volkswagen saw very good potential in the
IAV for a joint activity with Shanghai Volks -
wagen”, reports Dirk Dohemann who man-
aged IAV’s part of the project. “We’re a
proven partner that has a good knowledge of
the processes involved which is very impor-
tant for the release stages.” But this was no
routine project for IAV’s developers: Its cus-
tomer was Volkswagen in Shanghai, pro-
duction will be taking place in China where-
as data were approved and released by the
engineers in Wolfsburg – so the new Passat
for the North American and Chinese market
was born on three continents.
The German developers and their Chinese
colleagues operate together the “Project
House” at IAV in Gifhorn where they worked
as “Simultaneous Engineering Teams” (SETs)
– on the body-in-white or body styling parts,
for example. “There were two spokespersons
for each SET, one from Shanghai Volkswagen
and one from IAV”, Dohemann says. Com-
pletely screened off from the outside, a ded-
icated computer network was also set up that
the Chinese engineers could use too.”
All parties involved were on boardevery step of the way
Intensive communication was necessary
between the German and Chinese teams as
production demanded more than the usual
coordination: Because although the Passat
for the Chinese market and the US model
were to be as identical in design as possible,
allowances had to be made for local specifics.
“The mentality at the two sites is different”,
Dohemann says. “Plus the fact, there are dif-
fering approaches, for example, in the meth-
ods used for producing and assembling
components.”
Yet the aim was to keep production as iden-
tical as possible on both continents to cut
costs and make sure parts can be inter-
changed if the need arises. This is why every
modification request from China had to be
discussed with the partners in the US and also
approved by them. A feat the developers suc-
cessfully pulled off: At the end of the day, there
were just a handful of market-specific differ-
ences.
Dirk Dohemann draws a positive balance for
the joint activity: “Cooperation was excellent
and we had no problems with differing men-
talities on the German, American and Chinese
sides.
IAV played a large part in optimizinglightweight steel body
Not only was organizing the project a chal-
lenge. So, too, was the vehicle’s engineering
for IAV’s developers. The new car, for instance,
was to be as light as possible, making it
fuel-efficient, and also come with a high-qual-
ity line-up on the safety and ride comfort front
– and all at lowest possible cost. On top of this,
the lightweight steel body was simulated
and optimized for safety with support from
IAV’s computation department. A comparison
of virtual simulation and real-life collision – on
Volkswagen’s testing ground – showed a
very high level of conformity, as did comparing
stiffness and strength computations with
test results.
The project has since been successfully
completed, having gone into production on
both continents. “But we’ll also be staying on
board during the year”, Dohemann says.
“This way, for example, we can be of assis-
tance should further support be necessary
after the start of production.” In the meantime,
the car has also made its debut in public: At
the beginning of January, the US version had
its premiere at the North American Interna-
tional Auto Show in Detroit, presented by CEO
and President of Volkswagen Group of Amer-
ica, Inc., Jonathan Browning. Chinese con-
sumers were able to admire “their” Passat
after it was presented to the press and deal-
ers in April at the Shanghai Motor Show.
Contact:
36 Projects | automotion
Visitors took the joint “Bayern Innova-
tiv” – Innovative Bavaria – booth by
storm at the IAA Motor Show in
Frankfurt: MUTE, a lightweight and inexpen-
sive electric vehicle, proved to be a real
crowd puller. And IAV played a major part in
developing it – together with TUM (Munich
University of Technology) and nine other
partners from the automotive industry.
“There was constant huge interest here on the
last three days”, reports Steffen Lintz, head of
IAV’s Munich operation. “Even on the first
day, visitors not only included radio and TV re-
porters as well as trade journalists but also nu-
merous board members from major car man-
ufacturers.” They had all come to inspect the
booth’s highlight: MUTE. The electric city run-
about has been developed since mid-2010 by
a consortium led by TUM and is packed with
technical innovations – but the completely
roadworthy prototype was still ready in time for
the start of the motor show. Not only did Lintz’
team play a key part in making this possible but
also IAV’s Body Development department: The
design provided the basis for constructing the
frame in Munich. During the project, IAV also
stood by the university in an advisory capac-
ity, contributing expertise from areas like elec-
tromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and high-
voltage electrical system safety.
Benefiting from this professional support,
MUTE was able to reach an astonishing level
of quality and therefore attract huge attention
even alongside the automobile manufacturers’
concept vehicles. “Listen to the way the doors
close or take a look at the gap widths – even
now, MUTE gives the impression of being a ful-
ly-fledged vehicle”, says Project Manager
Martin Whitcombe.
Everyone of distinction came by onthe first day
The experts attending naturally wanted to
get a good look at it for themselves, with nu-
merous top decision-makers from the auto-
mobile industry paying MUTE a visit during the
show. BMW’s majority shareholder Susanne
Klatten came to the booth on the very first day
and spent no less than three quarters of an
hour inspecting the vehicle in every detail – as
joint owner of SGL Carbon, she was particu-
larly interested in the “lightweight” aspect. “Vis-
itors of this caliber show how well MUTE is go-
ing down with the experts”, Lintz is pleased to
report. “And Ms. Klatten wasn’t the only one –
everyone of distinction came to see us on the
first day.”
Funding is to be requested before the end of
2011 from the German Research Ministry for
the next vehicle generation – involving BMW
and Daimler. “And, needless to say, we’re also
extremely keen to be involved in taking MUTE
forward”, Lintz says.
Contact:
Electric (At)traction“MUTE” concept vehicle captivated audience at IAA Motor Show
Head of department Dr. Holger Pastil-
lé is responsible at IAV for interior,
seats and accessories. He explains
why testing seats is a real challenge and
which test benches IAV uses – and develops
itself – to do this with.
Which tests do you put seats through?
One of the most important tests measures the
strain on the seat surface using a buttock mock-
up. But we also examine the seat adjustment
mechanism and the “Easy Entry” seats from
Volkswagen and their suppliers that are de-
signed to make it easier to get into two-door cars.
Everything needs to work properly without wear
throughout the vehicle’s life. To do these tests, we
have numerous test benches, some of which we
have developed ourselves.
A huge effort ...
... that’s meanwhile paying its dividends: Our
test benches are turning out to be really big sell-
ers – we have received inquiries from numerous
interested parties who want to buy them. This
mainly relates to the “Endurance Strength 2”
which is used for testing the durability of a front
seat with the buttock mock-up. We have a unique
selling point here: The test bench is provided with
facilities that allow us to meet all of the conditions
prescribed in the testing specifications. That may
only be a minor detail, but it makes a major dif-
ference – leading clients to say: The reference test
bench is at IAV.
What other highlights do you have in your
laboratory?
We have a test bench, for example, that provides
the capability of determining the compensating
force for a ratchet-type seat adjuster. These
forces are recorded in the endurance test and
evaluated. And all under climatic conditions, of
course: The inside of an automobile can easily
heat up to 80 degrees if it stands in the sun.
This is repeated several thousand times to
measure durability. The test runs day and night
and lasts for about a week. At the end, we can see
from the computer whether the forces from the
test specification have been met. If we identify
wear or sluggishness during the test, we look for
the causes and give the client a recommenda-
tion on how to rectify the problem.
What else do you scrutinize?
Play and stiffness measurements are also another
interesting aspect: When a product is new, every-
thing’s tight and nothing moves about. But over
time, a certain play is inevitable. And we measure
this too: First on a new seat that then undergoes
other tests. At the end, we examine play and stiff-
ness once again. This enables us to draw con-
clusions on how the seat will behave when the car
is ten years old or more. The analyses we perform
generally focus on durability – also because
comfort is so hard to measure objectively. Apart
from this, durability is becoming more and more
important in general: When I started out in the au-
tomotive industry ten years ago, a vehicle was de-
signed to last for ten years. Shortly after that, the
German automobile industry formulated the goal
of making vehicles last far longer. This naturally
stepped up the requirements on seat testing.
Do you have a favorite test bench?
As head of department, I’m particularly proud of
our latest test benches. As these are largely se-
cret, though, I can only give you a few details: In
future, we will be moving more into material test-
ing which will allow us to examine the durability
of seat covers, for example – we have developed
something new. We will also be able to simulate
endurance testing in the laboratory and are cur-
rently in the process of working on a project for
a seat heating test bench. And, finally, we are also
working on a new test bench for endurance
testing seat-height adjustment that comes with
all sorts of interesting features – such as ad-
justable lever speed. But as I said, the details are
secret.
Why does IAV develop these test benches
itself at all?
IAV has been in the business for many years and
our technical consultant with over 15 years of pro-
fessional experience knows exactly what can hap-
pen to a seat. In other words, we know seats in-
side out – we use this incredibly broad knowledge
for our test benches so we can give our clients
the best possible service. And they are well
aware that the seat is one of the main psycho-
logical criteria in buying a car.
A crucial but often underestimated compo-
nent then?
Precisely! That’s something I had to learn at the
beginning as well: For me, seats used to be wire
frames with a bit of foam and a cover over them
– something absolutely unspectacular. Then I
delved deeper into the subject, and today I
know: The seat is one of the most complex
components in the entire vehicle. And that also
means that we need complex tests for it.
Contact:
“The Reference Test Bench Is at IAV”
Seats are more than a wire frame with a cover and need to be meticulously
tested as complex equipment elements
automotion | About IAV 37
For some years now, manufacturers have
increasingly been working on developing
vehicles with electric drives. As a deve-
lopment partner to the automotive industry, IAV
is involved on the cutting edge. Which projects
did IAV start out into electromobility with?
Reimann: From 1990, IAV was initially involved
in developing the Golf CityStromer. The City-
Stromer was engineered on the basis of the se-
cond Golf generation, with the Golf 3 taking over
as the platform from 1993. Unfortunately, the
Golf 3 CityStromer was only built in a small batch
of 120 units and sold primarily to energy sup-
pliers.
What was the reason for its low acceptan-
ce on the automobile market?
Reimann: Back then, just as today, the main pro-
blem with battery-powered electric vehicles was
their limited range on account of the battery’s
low energy density compared with gasoline and
diesel fuels. Extending traveling range means in-
stalling larger batteries, while accepting a si-
gnificant increase in weight and space loss. But
the battery’s energy density can also be im-
proved. A major advance on the energy-density
front came with the advent of the lithium-based
storage battery.
Wagner-Douglas: In 1999 IAV started out with
projects on developing e-vehicles with lithium-
ion batteries, such as for a vehicle with wheel-
hub motor, and for a minivan. Our job involved
designing and positioning new components and
assemblies, like the battery and battery cooling
system, designing and installing the low-volta-
ge and high-voltage wiring harnesses, adapting
the control system software, vehicle calibrati-
on and constructing prototypes. We then saw
a surge in development from 2008: Resulting
from growing discussion about reducing CO2
vehicle emissions and higher oil prices as well
as pressure from governments, the OEMs felt
obliged to do more in driving forward the de-
velopment of e-vehicles. Since then, IAV has
completed several projects for concept and pro-
duction vehicles with electric and hybrid pro-
pulsion.
Are there any particular challenges in de-
veloping electric vehicles?
Reimann: In developing e-vehicles, the manu-
facturers have, on the whole, so far integrated
e-traction components into conventional ve-
hicle architectures – to put it simply, they fit an
e-motor and battery instead of combustion en-
gine and tank. But to exploit the benefits of the
electric drive concept in full, an e-vehicle needs
to be completely re-engineered – starting with
the chassis, the e-motor and the traction bat-
tery and extending right through to the auxilia-
ries, such as motor and battery cooling systems
and passenger-compartment air-conditioning,
as well as the control system software. An in-
tegrated concept should be provided for the
electric vehicle as early as the design stage.
Wagner-Douglas: Over recent years, we have
built up a knowledge base and development po-
tential that allow us to turn this integrated con-
cept into reality. Some 250 development engi-
neers at IAV are currently working on electric and
hybrid projects for various OEMs. Recently, we
set up our third battery laboratory and a test
bench, the only one of its kind, for testing
electric and hybrid drive systems. Today, IAV has
the expertise to develop an all-new electric ve-
hicle – from the concept phase and prototype
to the start of production and field support.
Has IAV also developed any concepts of its
own for electromobility?
Wagner-Douglas: We produced the “Rolling E-
Chassis” concept study in which we can de-
monstrate the technical feasibility and savings
potential for future-proof universal chassis for
various e-vehicle concepts. This e-chassis
provides the basis for exploiting innovative sy-
stem-optimized e-drive concepts, making it
possible to produce a significant number of tho-
roughbred e-vehicles both quickly and cost-ef-
fectively.
On top of this, we have also invested a lot of de-
velopment work in concepts for various e-
drive components. One example being IAV’s Dri-
vePacEV80 electric drive unit, a compact mo-
dule comprising electric motor and two-speed
transmission. Given its modularity and scalability,
the drive unit can be used in various vehicle ca-
tegories from class-A microcar to compact-size
category C of either axle-hybrid, range-exten-
der, battery-powered or fuel-cell type.
Reimann: A further focus is on concepts for the
electromobility infrastructure. Our project on in-
ductive energy transfer aims to improve the
ease, reliability and convenience of supplying
electric cars with power in future. Instead of
using a cable at the recharging point, charging
current is transferred to the battery without ma-
king contact and without plug and cable across
an air gap between the induction surfaces in the
vehicle floor and in the road. This would com-
pletely resolve the cruising-range problem
electric vehicles face because the induction sur-
faces can be integrated in any roadway, and a
vehicle can in principle even be supplied with
power on the fly.
Contact:
Concentrated Expertisein Electromobility
Interview with Wolfgang Reimann and Jean Wagner-Douglas
on 20 years of developing e-drives at IAV
38 About IAV | automotion automotion | About IAV 39
IAV’s Neckarsulm operation moved to
new premises in June. The industrial
building it is using will be extended by
an indoor measurement and work-
shop facility, providing twice as much
space as it had before. Most of the
work done by IAV staff in Neckar-
sulm is for Audi and has to do
with diesel engine development
for the A6 and A8, engine design
and package well as motor racing.
IAV has been active at the
southern German site
since 1997.
Staff at IAV’s Ingolstadt operation
moved into new premises in August
where, from the fourth quarter, they
will have a modern laboratory for sensor and
actuator systems at their fingertips. Bene-
fiting IAV’s southern German clients in par-
ticular, it will continue to expand in the next
few years. In future, though, alternative drives
are likely to take on growing importance at
IAV’s Bavarian site too.
Getting even closer to the client – that is what
IAV’s staff at the Ingolstadt site want to do.
Which is why they moved to a new office build-
ing in the Bavarian town of Gaimersheim in Au-
gust. “The industrial estate there is just a few
minutes’ drive from the technical development
center of our client, Audi. And with the regu-
lar service provided by the shuttle bus, we can
easily be at our contacts there whenever we
need to be”, explains Office Manager Martin
Petermann. “We’re convinced these short
distances will be a real boon to the work we do
together.”
Projects growing all the time
IAV has had a branch office at Ingolstadt for as
long ago as 1998. Back in those days, coop-
eration started with a cockpit development
project, and the mechanical development
experts can also look back on a long history
of working for the premium manufacturer
from Bavaria. “Over the years, this cooperation
has flourished, with the office in Ingolstadt
growing all the time”, recalls Roland Pöppl, Sen-
ior Project Manager at Ingolstadt and Peter-
mann’s predecessor as office manager. Today,
IAV experts are in demand in many different
domains: engine and transmission calibration,
electronics development, cooling and air-
conditioning as well as sensor and actuator
systems.
Following the move, the sensor and actuator
system experts will be the ones to benefit from
the optimized working conditions most: From
the fourth quarter, the new site will have a lab-
oratory providing the capability of measuring
every conceivable component in detail and un-
der a wide range of different ambient condi-
tions. “Initially, the focus will be on all sensors
and actuators to do with the engine – like throt-
tle valves, EGR valves, pumps, turbocharger ac-
tuators, temperature, pressure and position
sensors”, Petermann reports. Thanks to a
universal electronic reader, there is hardly a
component the new laboratory will not be able
to focus on. “We can export and evaluate all
sensors and actuators in the engine”, the
office manager is pleased to report. “Later on,
we want to expand the lab, and also put sen-
sors through their paces from the bodyshell,
chassis and the exhaust system.”
Troubleshooting and avoiding problems in production
In the new laboratory, Petermann’s team will be
able to study sensors and actuators at tem-
peratures as low as minus 40 degrees and as
high as 150 degrees Celsius. It will also be pos-
sible to measure components at a wide range
of different humidity levels. “We have climate
cabinets we can produce all manner of tem-
perature and humidity profiles in” , Petermann
explains. “This also helps us when it comes to
troubleshooting: In the lab, we can simulate
every situation sensors and actuators are
likely to be confronted with in the vehicle
too.”
This not only helps the experts in analyzing
problems – with the tests they perform, we also
set out to avoid later failures. “We help man-
ufacturers and suppliers develop robust com-
ponents”, Petermann says. “For instance, we
get initial samples ready to go into production,
compile requirements specifications and as-
sess the quality of potential suppliers on be-
half of our clients.”
Setting up the new laboratory in Ingolstadt is
no coincidence: IAV has been assisting the
premium manufacturer for years in the field of
sensor and actuator systems. Meanwhile, the
IAV team is highly conversant with the process-
es involved at Audi and can check whether a
part meets the requirements for production.
Analyzing faults, speed is of the essence:
“Our client expects us to show huge flexibili-
ty”, Petermann reports. “If problems occur in
production vehicles, we need to analyze them
within twenty-four hours – another reason why
being in Audi’s direct proximity is so important
for us: Because in a situation like this, there’s
no time for us to start sending a component
to another location”.
Significance of alternative drives isgrowing
In future, Petermann is expecting cooperation
to grow in the field of alternative drives. “The
interest in hybrid and electric vehicles is in-
creasing all the time and it’s in this domain that
IAV can already demonstrate tremendous
expertise. With our detailed knowledge of
technical platforms in the VW Group, we can
provide Audi with optimum support in this field
too.”
Contact:
New Laboratory for Sensor andActuator Systems
IAV expands capacities in Ingolstadt
40 About IAV | automotion
New Premises in Neckarsulm
News in Brief
automotion | About IAV 41
IAV was an exhibitor at the 20th Aachen Col-
loquium “Automobile and Engine Technolo-
gy” from October 10 to 12, 2011. Our booth
displayed IAV innovations in e-mobility / al-
ternative drive systems as well as new de-
velopments on the conventional engine
front. Sponsored and featuring articles by IAV,
the “Combustion-Engine Handbook” was
also presented during the event.
The new IAV show booth concept
Staff
Yukihiko Mihara took over the reins at our sub-
sidiary in Japan on July 1, 2011. The 52-year-
old gathered many years of experience in the
powertrain business at Nissan, Siemens and
Continental before coming to IAV Japan in
2009 as VP Sales & Marketing. He is successor
to Dr. Mirko Knaak who, since 2007, has been
successful in turning IAV Japan into an impor-
tant agent serving our clients in Japan.
IAV at Aachen Colloquium
Munich
42 Messe | automotion
IAV’s Diary – This is Where to Meet Us!
December
06–07-12-2011CTI-Symposium
“Innovative Vehicle Transmissions“
Berlin, Germany
12-08 – 12-09-2011ATZ/MTZ Conference
“Virtual Powertrain Creation”
Unterschleissheim, Germany
January
MTZ 1/2012
°Improving Efficiency in Optimizing Cold-Start and
Cold-Idle Behavior in Automobile Diesel Engines“
February
02-07 – 02-09-2012EMC 2012
Congress with accompanying exhibition
Düsseldorf, Germany
02-14 - 02-15-20129th Braunschweig Symposium
Hybrid and Electric Vehicles
Braunschweig, Gifhorn, Germany
March
03-13 – 03-14-201212th International Stuttgart Symposium
“Automobile and Engine Technology”
Stuttgart, Germany
April
04-24 – 04-25-2012crash.tech 2012
Munich, Germany
04-24 – 04-26-2012SAE World Congress
Detroit, USA
04-24 – 04-26-2012SAE Transmission Symposium China
Beijing , China
04-26 – 04-27-2012Vienna Engine Symposium
Vienna Engine Symposium
ATZ 4/2012
“Efficient Energy Management for Next-Generation
Commercial Vehicles”
MTZ 4/2012
“Diesel Plug-In Hybrid”
Imprint
automotion Magazine for the customers of IAV GmbH,
Ingenieurgesellschaft Auto und Verkehr
Publisher IAV GmbH, Carnotstrasse 1 · 10587 Berlin
Phone +49 30 39978-0
www.iav.com · [email protected]
Responsible for Content Marketing/Communication: Burkhard Heise
Editors-in Chief Volker Schiffmann, Diana Reuter
Editors Kurt Blumenröder, Gerhard Buschmann, Matthias Kratzsch,
Dr. Gerhard Maas, Christian Müller-Bagehl, Wilfried Nietschke,
Wolfgang Reimann, Ralf Richter, Thomas Rölle, Dr. Jörg Roß,
Stefan Schmidt, Michael Schubert, Sven Siewert,
Lutz Stiegler, Carsten von Essen, Prof. Dr. Bernd Wiedemann
Assistants Christian Buck, Holger David
Picture Credits IAV
VW
TUM
Design and Layout ZITRUSBLAU GmbH Werbeagentur · www.zitrusblau.de
3D Visualizations LIGHTSHAPE · www.lightshape.net
Frequency of Publication: Four times a year
All rights reserved.