average of discharge from ji-paraná river (1978 to 2001) (agência nacional das Águas – ana)

1
75°0'0"W 75°0'0"W 70°0'0"W 70°0'0"W 65°0'0"W 65°0'0"W 60°0'0"W 60°0'0"W 55°0'0"W 55°0'0"W 50°0'0"W 50°0'0"W 20°0'0"S 20°0'0"S 15°0'0"S 15°0'0"S 10°0'0"S 10°0'0"S 5°0'0"S 5°0'0"S 0°0'0"N 0°0'0"N 5°0'0"N 5°0'0"N Legend Rivers Am azônia Rondônia Basin ofJi-Paraná CO M -1 PB -1 CO M -2 PB -2 JIP -1 JIP-2 JIP -3 JIP -4 JIP -5 63°0'0"W 63°0'0"W 62°0'0"W 62°0'0"W 61°0'0"W 61°0'0"W 60°0'0"W 60°0'0"W 13°0'0"S 13°0'0"S 12°0'0"S 12°0'0"S 11°0'0"S 11°0'0"S 10°0'0"S 10°0'0"S 9°0'0"S 9°0'0"S 8°0'0"S 8°0'0"S 0 40 80 120 160 20 Kilom eters Legend Sites Rivers Basin Ji-Paraná Average of discharge from Ji-Paraná river (1978 to 2001) (Agência Nacional das Águas – ANA) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 J F M A M J J A S O N D M onth Discharge (m 3 .s -1 ) pCO 2 (µatm) J J J F M M A A S O N D atm equilibrium tributaries Ji-Paraná pCO 2 (µatm) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 F M A M J J S N D 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 pC O 2 pH Average COM-1 and PB-1 pH Low water High water 2.7 38,0 24,3 4, 2 pCO 2 (µatm) Average JIP- 2,3 pH High water Low water 177, 5 166, 8 24, 2 240, 5 pCO 2 (µatm) Average JIP-1, 4, 5 High water Low water 156,9 84,1 24,4 185,9 CO 2 * (µM) HCO 3 - (µM) CO 2 * (µM) HCO 3 - (µM) pH 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 F M A M J J S N D 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 pC O 2 pH Machadinho 105,4 29,4 87,1 84,3 pCO 2 (µatm) High water Low water Pimenta Bueno - 2 pCO 2 (µatm) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 F M A M J J S N D 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 pC O 2 pH pH High water 177, 2 154,7 Low water 36,1 219, 7 Base Saturation ( % ) Urupá pH 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 F M A M J J S N D 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 pC O 2 pH 610,8 60,3 High water Low water 215,6 264,3 pCO 2 (µatm) INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE STUDY AREA Fev/00 Mar/01 Abr/02 May/99 Jun/00 Jul/01 Sep/00 Nov/99 Dec/01 The partial pressures of dissolved CO 2 (pCO 2 ) in the Ji-Paraná and its tributaries are a function of respiration and mineral weathering. Although rivers draining eutrofic soils (Rolim, Urupá, Jarú and Pimenta Bueno-2) show the highest DIC concentrations and outgassing (evasion) of CO 2 , pH changes lead to a pronounced seasonality in evasion. The outgassing is higher during the rising water, because the dilution of ground water by rain water, and probably also changes in metabolism, result in lower pH values, thus increasing the partial pressures of dissolved CO 2 (pCO 2 ) and evasion process. In the falling water, groundwater stay longer in contact with the substrate and weathering, which consumes H + and converts carbonic acid into bicarbonate, increases pH and lowers pCO 2 and the evasion process. The rivers draining distrofic soils (Comemoração, Pimenta Bueno-1, Preto e Machadinho) show lower DIC concentrations and lower pH, and the potential evasion of CO 2 is limited by lower pCO 2 . CONCLUSION The influences of total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentrations and pH on potential outgassing from rivers in Rondônia. Maria de Fátima F. L. Rasera 1 ; Alex Vladimir Krusche 1 ; Nei K. Leite 1 ; Jeffrey E. Richey 2 ; Anthony K. Aufdenkampe 3 1 Universidade de São Paulo –CENA. Lab. de Ecologia Isotópica. Piracicaba/SP – Brasil [email protected] 2 School of Oceanography, University of Washington, USA 3 Stroud Water Research Center - USA Recent studies point to the importance of CO 2 outgassing from rivers of the Amazon, suggesting that a significant part of the carbon fixed by forest return to the atmosphere through this pathway. Gas exchange between the atmosphere and waters is a funcion of gaseous gradients across the air-water interface, and the water pCO 2 is strongly determined by the concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and pH, which, in turn, are a funcion of physical, chemical and biological processes. This study focus on the influence of DIC concentrations and the pH on potencial CO 2 outgassing to atmosphere from rivers of the Ji-Paraná basin, Rondônia. METODOLOGY RESULTS River Water Fiel d Laboratory Filtra tion Dissolved Inorganic Carbon - ( DIC ) Calculated Theoretical diffusion model : F = D.(C water - k.P air ) / Z (Broecker, 1974) Where: D = gas- and temperature-specific diffusion coefficient; C water = concentration of gas in the water; k.P air = concentration of gas in equilibrium with the atmosphere Z = thicness of the boundary layer Total Organic Carbon Analyser (Shimadzu, 5000A) Infrared gas analyser, non dispersive Thermodynamic equilibrium equations [CO 2 *] = DIC .(10 pH ) 2 . (10 pH ) 2 + k 1 .(10 pH ) + k 1 .k 2 (Stumm & Morgan, 1996) DIC (µM) pH temperature pH pH meter condutivity Condutivity meter Add Thymol [pCO2] = [CO2*] k0 Acknowledgement s CO 2 evasion (mol CO 2 .m - 2 .d -1 ) AVERAGE HIGH WATER LOW WATER 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 COM 1 COM 2 PB 1 PB 2 JIP 1 R olim U rupá JIP 2 JIP 3 Jaru M achad. JIP 4 JIP 5 P reto * D/Z = K (exchange coeficient) = 1,2 m.d -1 (Richey et al, 2002) SH 37.13 To expand the understanding of changes in pH and DIC concentrations in the Ji-Paraná River Basin and its consequences for the outgassing of CO 2 .

Upload: daktari

Post on 21-Jan-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

24,2. 177,5. 166,8. 240,5. High water. Low water. 60,3. 610,8. AVERAGE. LOW WATER. HIGH WATER. Average COM-1 and PB-1. atm equilibrium. tributaries. Ji-Paraná. CO 2 * ( µM). CO 2 * ( µM). p CO 2 ( µatm). pH. HCO 3 - ( µM). HCO 3 - ( µM). p CO 2 ( µatm). DIC ( µM). N. J. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Average of discharge from Ji-Paraná river (1978 to 2001) (Agência Nacional das Águas – ANA)

75°0'0"W

75°0'0"W

70°0'0"W

70°0'0"W

65°0'0"W

65°0'0"W

60°0'0"W

60°0'0"W

55°0'0"W

55°0'0"W

50°0'0"W

50°0'0"W

20°0'0"S 20°0'0"S

15°0'0"S 15°0'0"S

10°0'0"S 10°0'0"S

5°0'0"S 5°0'0"S

0°0'0"N 0°0'0"N

5°0'0"N 5°0'0"N

Legend

Rivers

Amazônia

Rondônia

Basin of Ji-Paraná

COM-1

PB-1

COM-2

PB-2

JIP-1

JIP-2

JIP-3

JIP-4

JIP-5

63°0'0"W

63°0'0"W

62°0'0"W

62°0'0"W

61°0'0"W

61°0'0"W

60°0'0"W

60°0'0"W

13°0'0"S 13°0'0"S

12°0'0"S 12°0'0"S

11°0'0"S 11°0'0"S

10°0'0"S 10°0'0"S

9°0'0"S 9°0'0"S

8°0'0"S 8°0'0"S

0 40 80 120 16020Kilometers

Legend

Sites

Rivers

Basin Ji-Paraná

­Average of discharge from Ji-Paraná river (1978 to 2001)

(Agência Nacional das Águas – ANA)

0200400

600800

100012001400

160018002000

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Month

Dis

char

ge (

m3.s

-1)

pC

O2

(µat

m)

JJJ F MM AA S O N D

atm equilibrium tributaries Ji-Paraná

pCO

2 (

µat

m)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

F M A M J J S N D4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5pCO2 pH

Average COM-1 and PB-1

pH

Low waterHigh water

2.7

38,0 24,3

4,2

pC

O2 (

µa

tm)

Average JIP-2,3

pH

High water Low water

177,5166,8

24,2

240,5

pCO

2 (

µat

m)

Average JIP-1, 4, 5

High water Low water

156,9

84,124,4

185,9

CO2* (µM)

HCO3-(µM)

CO2* (µM)

HCO3-(µM)

pH

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

F M A M J J S N D

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0pCO2 pH

Machadinho

105,4

29,4 87,184,3

pCO

2 (

µat

m)

High water Low water

Pimenta Bueno -2

pCO

2 (

µat

m)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

F M A M J J S N D

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

pCO2 pH

pHHigh water

177,2154,7

Low water

36,1

219,7

Base Saturation

( % ) Urupá

pH

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

F M A M J J S N D

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0pCO2 pH

610,8

60,3

High water Low water

215,6

264,3

pCO

2 (

µat

m)

INTRODUCTION

OBJECTIVE

STUDY­AREA

Fev/00

Mar/01

Abr/02

May/99

Jun/00

Jul/01

Sep/00

Nov/99

Dec/01

The partial pressures of dissolved CO2 (pCO2) in the Ji-Paraná and its tributaries are a

function of respiration and mineral weathering. Although rivers draining eutrofic soils

(Rolim, Urupá, Jarú and Pimenta Bueno-2) show the highest DIC concentrations and

outgassing (evasion) of CO2, pH changes lead to a pronounced seasonality in evasion.

The outgassing is higher during the rising water, because the dilution of ground water by

rain water, and probably also changes in metabolism, result in lower pH values, thus

increasing the partial pressures of dissolved CO2 (pCO2) and evasion process. In the

falling water, groundwater stay longer in contact with the substrate and weathering, which

consumes H+ and converts carbonic acid into bicarbonate, increases pH and lowers pCO2

and the evasion process.

The rivers draining distrofic soils (Comemoração, Pimenta Bueno-1, Preto e Machadinho)

show lower DIC concentrations and lower pH, and the potential evasion of CO2 is limited

by lower pCO2.

CONCLUSION

The influences of total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentrations and pH on potential outgassing from rivers

in Rondônia.Maria de Fátima F. L. Rasera1; Alex Vladimir Krusche1; Nei K. Leite1; Jeffrey E. Richey2; Anthony K. Aufdenkampe3

1 Universidade de São Paulo –CENA. Lab. de Ecologia Isotópica. Piracicaba/SP – Brasil [email protected] School of Oceanography, University of Washington, USA

3 Stroud Water Research Center - USA

Recent studies point to the importance of CO2 outgassing from rivers of the Amazon,

suggesting that a significant part of the carbon fixed by forest return to the

atmosphere through this pathway. Gas exchange between the atmosphere and

waters is a funcion of gaseous gradients across the air-water interface, and the water

pCO2 is strongly determined by the concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon

(DIC) and pH, which, in turn, are a funcion of physical, chemical and biological

processes. This study focus on the influence of DIC concentrations and the pH on

potencial CO2 outgassing to atmosphere from rivers of the Ji-Paraná basin,

Rondônia.

METODOLOGY

RESULTS

River Water

Field

Laboratory FiltrationDissolved Inorganic

Carbon - ( DIC )

Calculated

Theoretical diffusion model :

F = D.(Cwater - k.Pair) / Z (Broecker, 1974)

Where:

D = gas- and temperature-specific diffusion coefficient;

Cwater = concentration of gas in the water;

k.Pair = concentration of gas in equilibrium with the atmosphere

Z = thicness of the boundary layer

Total Organic Carbon Analyser

(Shimadzu, 5000A)

Infrared gas analyser,

non dispersive

Thermodynamic equilibrium equations

[CO2*] = DIC .(10pH)2 .

(10pH)2+ k1.(10pH) + k1.k2

(Stumm & Morgan, 1996)

DIC

M)

pH

temperature

pH

pH meter

condutivity

Condutivity meterAdd Thymol

[pCO2] = [CO2*] k0

Acknowledgements

CO

2 e

vasi

on

(m

ol

CO

2.m

-2.d

-1)

AVERAGE

HIGH WATER

LOW WATER

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

COM­1 COM­2 PB­1 PB­2 J IP­1 Rolim Urupá J IP­2 J IP­3 J aru Machad. J IP­4 J IP­5 Preto

* D/Z = K (exchange coeficient) = 1,2 m.d-1 (Richey et al, 2002)

SH 37.13

To expand the understanding of changes in pH and DIC concentrations in the Ji-

Paraná River Basin and its consequences for the outgassing of CO2.